Why Starting Edinson Volquez Isn’t A Bad Idea
The marathon regular season is over, and the middle-distance sprint that is the playoffs is about to begin. The Pirates will host the Giants on Wednesday in the NL Wild Card game, and now that the dust has settled, it appears that righty Edinson Volquez is the Bucs’ choice to take on Giants’ ace southpaw Madison Bumgarner. Many have pointed to Volquez’ relatively lofty 4.15 FIP as a rationale to bypass him in favor of other options – my gut is that the Pirates have chosen the right guy.
Volquez, now 31, has had quite the whirlwind career. He was considered a gem of the Rangers’ minor league system for quite awhile – he, John Danks and Thomas Diamond were at point expected to cure the longstanding starting pitching ills of the Texas organization. He struggled at the major league level with the Rangers for small parts of three seasons, posting a 3-11 record, and was then dispatched to Cincinnati following the 2007 season in a rather interesting trade that netted the Rangers Josh Hamilton. In the short-term, this deal benefited both teams immensely, as Volquez had a breakout season in his first campaign with the Reds, going 17-6, 3.21, and making the NL All Star team.
That was as good as it got in Cincinnati. He never again qualified for an ERA title as a Red, enduring three injury-plagued seasons before finishing 2011 just strong enough that the Padres accepted him as a main cog – along with prospects Yonder Alonso, Brad Boxberger and Yasmani Grandal – in the blockbuster Mat Latos deal. His tenure in San Diego was rather unpleasant – he led the NL in walks in 2012 and in earned runs allowed in a 2013 season split between the Padres and Dodgers. There was no trade involved this time – he was actually released by the Padres in late August.
His raw 2013 numbers were pretty grisly – a 5.71 ERA overall, and an awful 6.01 mark as a Padre. Sure, his 4.24 FIP was a lot more palatable, but this guy got released, and by a subpar ballclub at that. Enter the Pittsburgh Pirates in the offseason, signing Volquez to a one-year, $5M deal, and inserting him into the starting rotation. What did they see that no one else had? Was Volquez as bad as he appeared in 2013? Is he good as his glittering 2014 3.04 ERA?
Let’s take a look at Volquez’ outcome frequency and relative production by BIP type data compared to MLB average for 2013 and 2014, both before and after adjustment for context. First, the frequency info:
| FREQ – 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Volquez | % | REL | PCT |
| K | 18.3% | 96 | 36 |
| BB | 9.9% | 130 | 97 |
| POP | 5.5% | 70 | 15 |
| FLY | 26.4% | 93 | 41 |
| LD | 23.9% | 112 | 85 |
| GB | 44.2% | 104 | 52 |
| FREQ – 2014 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Volquez | % | REL | PCT |
| K | 17.3% | 85 | 17 |
| BB | 8.8% | 116 | 84 |
| POP | 5.8% | 75 | 23 |
| FLY | 26.8% | 96 | 51 |
| LD | 18.6% | 90 | 7 |
| GB | 48.8% | 112 | 90 |
Volquez begins from a very difficult starting point – he’s a relatively low K (K rate percentile ranks of 36 and 17 in 2013 and 2014, respectively), high BB (97 and 84) guy. That’s a pretty tough road to success – such a pitcher must manage batted ball contact extremely well to have a chance. There are two other very significant changes in Volquez’ frequency profile from 2013 to 2014. First, and less importantly for the long haul, his liner rate has cratered this season, from a percentile rank of 85 in 2013 to 7 in 2014. Such rates fluctuate much more than other BIP type rates, and Volquez’ have been all over the board throughout his career.
On the other hand, his grounder rate has spiked significantly from a 52 percentile rank in 2013 to 90 in 2014. His 2013 mark was a career low – for Volquez to have any chance to excel, he must keep the ball on the ground a very high percentage of the time.
Let’s now take a look at the production by BIP type allowed by Volquez, both before and after adjustment for context:
| PROD – 2013 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volquez | AVG | OBP | SLG | REL PRD | ADJ PRD | ACT ERA | CALC ERA | TRU ERA |
| FLY | 0.396 | 0.964 | 178 | 88 | ||||
| LD | 0.595 | 0.833 | 87 | 102 | ||||
| GB | 0.253 | 0.275 | 114 | 80 | ||||
| ALL BIP | 0.347 | 0.553 | 118 | 90 | ||||
| ALL PA | 0.276 | 0.348 | 0.440 | 121 | 97 | 5.71 | 4.69 | 3.76 |
| PROD – 2014 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volquez | AVG | OBP | SLG | REL PRD | ADJ PRD | ACT ERA | CALC ERA | TRU ERA |
| FLY | 0.230 | 0.581 | 65 | 89 | ||||
| LD | 0.670 | 0.854 | 99 | 103 | ||||
| GB | 0.185 | 0.207 | 60 | 87 | ||||
| ALL BIP | 0.280 | 0.427 | 74 | 90 | ||||
| ALL PA | 0.226 | 0.295 | 0.344 | 84 | 99 | 3.04 | 3.16 | 3.72 |
The actual production allowed on each BIP type is indicated in the AVG and SLG columns, and is converted to run values and compared to MLB average in the REL PRD column. That figure is then adjusted for context, such as home park, team defense, luck, etc., in the ADJ PRD column. In the three right-most columns, his actual ERA, calculated component ERA based on actual production allowed, and “tru” ERA, which is adjusted for context, are all presented. For the purposes of this exercise, SH and SF are included as outs and HBP are excluded from the OBP calculation.
Lots of interesting stuff here. Let’s start at the end on this one. Volquez’ “tru” ERA is almost exactly the same in 2013 (3.76) and 2014 (3.72). Kudos to the Pirates for buying low on a MLB average starting pitcher coming off of an apparently terrible season.
Just take a look at the production allowed by Volquez on fly balls in 2013 – .396 AVG-.964 SLG, for 178 REL PRD before adjustment for context. A closer look reveals that he yielded an awful lot of cheap homers, many of them at home in a season in which the Padres brought in their outfield fences by a significant margin. After adjustment for context, Volquez’ 2013 ADJ PRD on fly balls plunged down to 88. There’s more……even though Volquez allowed above average production on grounders in 2013 (.253 AVG-.275 SLG, 114 REL PRD), after adjustment for context, his grounder ADJ PRD plunged to 80, the very lowest among NL ERA qualifiers. Basically, he allowed the weakest grounders of any NL starter. The disconnect between his actual production allowed on all BIP (118 REL PRD) and his 90 ADJ PRD after adjustment for context was by far the largest among NL ERA qualifiers. Volquez was way better than his 2013 ERA of 5.71, and was even better than his 2013 FIP of 4.24.
So that is what the Pirates were buying low on in the free agent market. They brought him to a bigger ballpark, with a superior team defense, and watched context work its wonders with virtually the same exact pitcher in 2014. He has allowed relatively meager actual fly ball production (.230 AVG-.581 SLG, 65 REL PRD), but after adjustment for context, his 2014 89 ADJ PRD figure basically matches 2013’s 88. As we saw in the frequency table, Volquez is inducing many more grounders in 2014, and he’s allowed a modest .185 AVG-.207 SLG (60 REL PRD) on them. Even though they’ve been hit a bit harder (87 ADJ PRD after adjustment for context) in 2014, this is still a net plus. On all BIP, Volquez’ ADJ PRD of 90 is unchanged since 2013, though there is a dramatic difference between the actual production allowed in 2013 (118 REL PRD) and 2014 (74). No, Volquez is not nearly as good as his 3.04 ERA, but isn’t nearly as mediocre as his 4.15 FIP, either. He is a quality contact manager, pitching in a big ballpark, with a good defense behind him. A very wise investment of $5M, in other words.
If the Bucs had their choice, Francisco Liriano or perhaps Gerrit Cole would be taking the mound on Wednesday, but they pitched this weekend in the club’s unsuccessful pursuit of the NL Central crown. The fact that Volquez is next in the queue is one reason, but only a small one, that he should get the nod. He was the only starter who took the ball every fifth day – all season – for the Pirates. Only two of their starters, Volquez and Liriano, qualified for the ERA title, and the latter only did so by 1/3 of an inning, with 30 1/3 fewer innings pitched than Volquez. He has been their constant, the guy who has gotten them to this point, and with no clearly superior alternative qualitatively, he should be the guy ahead of Jeff Locke and Vance Worley, who both of course will be rested and ready in the event the starter falters early.
Then there’s the quality of his recent performances. Since allowing 8 earned runs in 2 1/3 innings on June 18, Volquez has posted a 1.85 ERA. Yes, it’s ERA, but whether or not that’s adjusted for any sort of context, that’s one really impressive number. He has allowed more than three earned runs in exactly one of his 17 starts over that span. Any way you slice it, the odds are extremely high that he will keep the Pirates in the game on Wednesday – and given the way the Pirates’ pitching staff is constructed, without a hammer ace – that is really all they can ask.
In the big picture, the Giants may be a slight favorite on Wednesday, as Madison Bumgarner is a better alternative than any of the Pirates’ starters. Though the Pirates didn’t get here on starting pitcher star power, they did get here in large part due to a well-conceived overall run prevention strategy. They play in a big yard, with quality defenders dotting the field. They made a key midseason adjustment, sacrificing the power potential of Pedro Alvarez for the better all-around game of Josh Harrison. The entire staff’s performance has surged since that move, and it’s not by accident. The Pirates are playing on Wednesday because of the contributions of many, and Edinson Volquez is one of the many unheralded contributors who deserve their just due.
Nice article. Watching Eddie pitch, he can be frustrating with the spotty command, but there are also a lot of times when he looks pretty unhittable. Not that the batters can’t make contact, but that they can’t make good contact. Squibbers abound!
He’s also got what I think is a pretty good mentality for a high pressure game. He’s always loose and looks like he’s enjoying himself. His teammates seem to like him and pick him up. I think that helps him make good pitches to get out of a jam after he loses his control for a batter or two.
Dusty Baker thought the same thing.
1-2/3 IP, 4 runs, 4 hits, 2 walks later..maybe not so much.
And that is, of course, one of the options. But Eddie’s on a roll right now, and sometimes a manager has to trust the hot hand, advanced metrics aside.
I agree. I just can’t pass up a chance to get a shot in at Dusty. The entire reason Volquez pitched game 1 of the 2010 NLDS, as far as I could gather, is that he is Dominican, and as such is used to high pressure situations. Which is basically the same reason Cueto pitched the coin flip game last year. To more or less the same result.
I will be authoring the next piece in this series, “Why Riding a Motorcycle Through the Flaming Wreckage of an Exploding Train Pulling Tank Cars of Gasoline Isn’t a Bad Idea.”
And Pirates fans will probably be wishing they were with me in the burning wreckage after Edinson walks his fourth or fifth batter…
Volquez has made 31 starts this season. Frequency of number of starts versus number of walks issued: |
0 walks, 1 start
1 walk, 7 starts
2 ” , 12 ”
3 ” , 6 ”
4 ” , 3 ”
5 ” , 2 ”
His walk rate ranks 74th highest among the 88 qualified starters, so they’re certainly still an issue and something to be wary of, but his command is much better than it’s been.
You sound like the salty Reds fan that I work with, by the way.
SF has 4 LHB (5 if you count Bum’s probable 2 PAs), 3 RHB, and Panda who is significantly worse against LHP. Starting Locke (LHP) instead is basically flipping the platoon in 6 PAs in 2 trips through the order, and 7-8 if he stays out to face the top 1-2 hitters again to finish an inning. There’s not really any way that Volquez is an overall better pitcher by enough to counteract that.
Oops, Bum actually bats R. Point still stands though.
Point does not still stand, because it never stood, period. The point may stand if arguing Liriano vs. Volquez, but Jeff Locke walks way too many guys to be in a postseason rotation, let alone starting a must win game.
Locke has a lower BB% in 2014 and career than Volquez.
Re: Locke v. Volquez BB%
Locke’s 1st half BB% was 2.8% vs. 10.3% in the 2nd half – his seasonal line doesn’t quite tell the whole tale of how he pitched, unless you expect him to magically revert back to his 1st half anomaly.
MadBum hits righty. And the Giants have a 104 OPS+ against lefties v. a 99 OPS+ v. righties. So I don’t think this is as strong a consideration as you suggest.
I count five lefty hitters and Pablo: Panik, Ishikawa, Crawford, Belt, Blanco. RH is Pence and Posey. Unless Bochy gets unconventional.
Exactly right. Bochy’s line-up holds zero mystery:
Blanco
Panik
Posey
Sandoval
Pence
Belt
Ishikawa
Crawford
Bumgarner
Only Posey, Pence & Bumgarner are RH hitters. Sandoval has a significant LH advantage; he’s been pathetic on the right side this season. Belt is off two consecutive DLs, but been swinging very well; indeed, the MAIN reason for the misleading R/L split is Belt’s being unavailable, with Morse going to IB in his stead. The only one of the LH hitters with any sort of equanimity with LH pitching is Crawford; all the rest of the left side hitters have a platoon advantage against RH pitching. And finally, the teams that have played the Giants the most this season, the ones in their own division, where they have decent LH pitching, have been adjusting their rotations to ensure they’ve gone with LH pitching as much as possible. In recent weeks, this has helped Sandoval in particular, and hurt Pence in particular (Posey’s been hot regardless), but since regaining Belt, I expect the Giants are more than content to deal with the disadvantage to Pence.
Jeff Locke is terrible. I’m assuming you haven’t watched many Bucs games this season, but he is literally a non-option to start this game.
Locke has been good at times, but his best pitch is a changeup and he’s not particularly effective against lefties.
.309 wOBA vs. lefties for his career / .322 against righties.
This year those marks are .238 and .342
All of this makes sense until you watch me play baseball. It doesn’t matter what side of the plate you stand on when I miss the strike zone as consistently as I do. Hurdle would deserve to be fired if he started Locke.
Blanco, Panik and Crawford all have higher OPS vs. lefties this year than righties (in the case of Panik and Crawford, by quite a lot actually). Even Belt has a higher BA and OBP vs. lefties and if Bochy was concerned about losing his power vs. lefties he could counter by moving Posey to 1B and catching Susac who is OPS’ing over 1.000 against southpaws (though granted, in a very small sample size). Not to mention that Posey crushes lefties.
Altogether, hard to see much of a platoon advantage for the Pirates to start any lefty, let alone Locke.
Panik’s the sort of hitter who really will never have a meaningful preference of opposing pitcher: a very short load with a push out toward the ball, he’s pretty much Pete Runnels redux. Blanco had an awful first half and only recovered when he started emulating Pagan by either laying off outside pitches or trying to push them to left field, and since he’s got little power, that approach has left something of a misleading impression about his preference. Belt wasn’t hitting anywhere near as well as he has lately, when opposing teams were still sending lots of RH pitchers against the Giants; but lately, when he’s been hitting well, they’ve faced quite a bit more LH pitching; so, it’s more a function of Belt’s form at the time. Crawford you’re certainly right on, as it’s not just this year.
Regardless, what makes this entire discussion weird to me is that, while it’s stately plainly, it fails to emphasize the biggest reason for going with Volquez: his turn up in the rotation. The only other realistic options for such a game that aren’t on the DL for the Pirates are Liriano and Cole, with the latter having pitched Sunday, the former having pitched Saturday, and neither with any positive history of throwing well on short rest. If they could, I expect the Pirates would choose Cole, considering he had one of the more dominant wins over the Giants this season; but even then, it’s not like it’d be a clear choice.
I would agree that Volquez is the best option to start but only because Hurdle wasted Cole on Sunday. Hindsight now but that’s the decision most people are really questioning, not Volquez vs. Locke. And a rested Cole vs. Volquez should be about as clear a choice as Bochy deciding between Bumgarner and Peavy. A pitcher who is hot in the 2nd half because his ERA is outperforming his peripherals is not someone you take over your young horse who truly does have ace stuff. Not unless you’re looking to get burned.
1 game so anything can happen but Hurdle did put the Pirates at a disadvantage by not holding Cole back. Now he just has to hope his team picks him up on it like the Royals bailed out Yost last night.
So, you (with many others, I presume) are saying that: IF the Pirates’ choice* for game 162 were not Cole (whose turn it was in the rotation; so, a September roster expansion call-up, or someone out-of-order and under-rested … such as Volquez);
AND the Pittsburghers were to have gone on to lose with that objectively inferior choice;
AND THEN the Cards later Sunday were to have gone on to lose their 162nd …
there’d have been no second guessing?
See, I don’t buy that. I grant there are those who view the game thru a fangraph closely and their numbers are legion and all that rot; but at the confluence of the media Rivers Mainstream and Social, the trickle of rationals is overwhelmed by a thunderous roar from the combined ignorant, the unthinking, reactionaries, herd middlers, contrarians, constitutional irascibles, mixed media arts & metaphysics types, and assorted nuts, who in no time can produce in no time mighty cascades of spittle & bovine excrement that render saber technology as feckless as a tercio confronted close-massed cannonade from Sheffield metalworks.
[*name of a great Afro-pop double album, that, by the incomparable Orchestra Baobab of Dakar)
It’s a bad idea.
Thanks for the great article/info. I am 60+ years a Pirate fan and had high hopes for this year. I was pretty skeptical of EV signing and had visions of him turning out to be Jonathan Sanchez 2.
But for the last stretch he has been awesome – and fun to watch. Like all Pirate starters he gives up way to many walks for my liking – but has managed to keep those runners from scoring.
My only quibble with you post is that I really think the Pirates are a below average defensive team. Walker is a corner infielder being asked to play second base – and has not done it very well the last couple of years. Nobody at first base has been even average and while it Mccutcheon plays way too deep and has a below average arm. Getting Pedro off of third has helped – but I am not sold on Harrison’s range at 3rd – good arm and great reactions – but seems like some balls get by him that a good 3rd baseman would get to.
I don’t see below average.
The outfield is at least average, I think. McCutchen might be a bit below average, and you’re right that his arm is pretty bad, but he’s not a dreadful CFer. Marte is great in LF and Snider is solid, as are the other options (Polanco, Lambo, Tabata).
I think the infield is at least average too. Harrison to me looks like an elite defensive third basemen with great range. Mercer is very consistent, maybe a tick above average. Walker’s range isn’t good, but I don’t see him as being a disaster out there. And while Ike is a pretty bad defender, Gaby looks solid to me at first.
And of course Martin and Stewart are beasts.
Interestingly, DRS and UZR don’t show much consensus on this team. DRS loves Marte, Mercer and Harrison’s 3B work. UZR is less enthusiastic.
It’s difficult to judge the Pirates’ individual defensive players because, as far as I know, UZR ignores shifts. Which means we might plausibly think that the Pirates’ decent team defense is nonetheless masking some subpar individual defensive performances.
Andrew McCutchen (-13.7 UZR/150 in CF, largely driven by his horrific arm), Pedro Alvarez (-10.0 UZR/150 at 3B), Neil Walker (-8.4 UZR/150 at 2B) and Ike Davis (-8.1 UZR/150 at 1B) were all various flavors of bad, and they made up four of the seven highest player-position innings played combos on the roster.
Outside of Russell Martin and Josh Harrison, none of the team’s primary players were significant plus defenders. Metrics are split on Jordy Mercer, as UZR thinks he’s just average but DRS believes he’s elite. Starling Marte was above-average in LF, but subpar in center.
Role players didn’t help much, either. Snider’s performance was uneven–excellent in LF and terrible in right. Both Chris Stewart and Clint Barmes were plus defenders, but Jose Tabata and Gregory Polanco were dreadful in RF. Gaby Sanchez was better than Ike Davis, but that’s damning with faint praise.
| Which means we might plausibly think that the Pirates’ decent team defense is nonetheless masking some subpar individual defensive performances.
Maybe… Seems just as plausible to me that extreme shifting means good defenders are getting poor marks.
Except UZR doesn’t penalize defenders for shifts, which means that the Pirates’ infielders defensive figures are probably smaller sample size than we’d like, but there’s no reason to believe they’re systematically inaccurate.
Put another way, shifts are a great way to make up for not having a huge amount of individually talented infield defenders.
Pirates fans were the worst last year. Looked like a bunch of drunken Steelers fans who found tickets in the parking lot while they were tailgating. I’m glad Hurdle is doing his share.
Seriously, Mccutcheon?^^^
Get over it – it’s the internet and auto type is everywhere – I hate grammar/spelling Nazis – there are many more important things to worry about.
Like Libertarianism!
Sorry, but as a Jays fan I would find it unacceptable for anyone to identify themselves as also being a fan of my team and then type something up about Jose Batista.
It’s actually pretty inexcusible to not be able to spell the last name of the brightest MLB star your city has seen in decades, but yeah, go right on ahead and blame the evil internet or whatever for you being a moron.
I still don’t understand how volquez is bigger than vance worley. One pablo sandoval long ball after 2 walks will put an end to his night
The article refers to Volquez’s groundball rate this season as “significantly” higher than last season, yet it’s only a difference of about 4%. I’d say something like 10% would be considered significant. And he actually had a higher groundball rate in all three seasons prior to last year.
The description of him as a “quality contact manager” makes it seem like he’s some kind of finesse pitcher with exceptional command. He has never been that type of pitcher, and that is why he has struggled. He isn’t throwing more strikes this season. He has good stuff, which is the reason why he can induce weak contact.
The main reason why he’s had success this year is because he’s been much better in the stretch. He has a .242 BABIP with runners on base this season. That compares to a BABIP of .278 with nobody on.
Tony,
I find your articles very interesting (this one particularly so, as I’m a Pirates fan), but I do have a question on the calculations for adjusted production. You mention that adjusted production strips out team defense, luck, and home park-related biases, but it seems as though the biggest value-add of this analysis is figuring out exactly how adjusted production corrects for these factors.
Is adjusted production simply based on exit speed/angle for batted balls? This is fascinating stuff, especially given the unsatisfactory nature of existing pitching metrics, but the inner geek in me, while I’m hopeful that adjusted production and TRU ERA can correct some of the flaws we see in FIP, needs a bit more detail on how the sausage is made. 🙂
Cheers,
Joshua
I predict 4+ IP, 3 H, 5 BB, 3 K, and 4 ER before the call to the bullpen mercifully comes…
Nice prediction
I nailed the ERA, which is most important to me, because I’m a traditionalist. Got the hits and walks reversed, though. Guess I must have been looking at my crystal ball in the mirror for that part of the prediction…
lol Fangraphs. You might as well have mentioned his impressive win rate while you were at it
ESPN.com would probably be embarrassed to run this article in 2014
Did you even read the article? I don’t think starting Volquez in the WC game was ideal, but Tony’s point was essentially that Volquez’s contact management abilities mean that he’s a league-average SP, rather than the bum that his FIP would indicate.
It’s not necessarily a great idea to start an average pitcher in the biggest game of the year, but it also probably didn’t matter, given Bumgardner’s brilliance.
Comparing the level of analysis to pitcher wins is absurd.