Xander Bogaerts Is a Very Weird Good Player
When Xander Bogaerts was climbing the prospect rankings back in 2013, he was billed as an offense-first shortstop, a guy who would probably end up growing out of the position early in his career, but would have the power to become a top flight third baseman. In summarizing their write-up as the Red Sox top prospect after the 2013 season, Baseball America wrote that Bogaerts should develop into “a likely peak of 25-plus homers a year in the middle of the lineup.” In other write-ups, they noted his “plus plus raw power”, and the questions about his value were almost always tied to his defensive abilities.
Bogaerts, now 24, is coming off back to back +4 WAR seasons, and as a 24-year-old, he’s established himself as one of the best young players in baseball. But he’s also turned himself into something like the complete opposite of what he was billed to be as a prospect.
Bogaerts, right now, has a 113 wRC+, the same mark he put up last year. But instead of building off his 21 home run season, Bogaerts has instead gotten to that mark by turning himself into the east coast version of Joe Panik.
In his first 96 plate appearances of the year, Bogaerts has racked up 29 hits, but 26 of them have been singles. He has two doubles and a triple, but has yet to hit a ball out of the park, and so while he’s hitting .330, he’s slugging just .375. And even that might be overstate his 2017 power levels.
Bogaerts has 78 balls tracked by Statcast this year. Of the 133 players with 70+ tracked batted balls this year, Bogaerts ranks 127th in average exit velocity on balls in the air. Here are the six players who rank below him: Dee Gordon, Jorge Polanco, Erick Aybar, Jarrod Dyson, Billy Hamilton, Jose Peraza. Bogaerts is hitting the ball with the kind of authority that makes you something like an offensive zero. And even though he’s making more contact, it’s really hard to produce at a high level with this kind of contact.
MLB rolled out an expected wOBA calculation as part of their recent Baseball Savant update, so you can search for an xWOBA leaderboard from their site now. They take the expected outcomes on balls in play from the Statcast data (and add in actual walks, hit by pitches, and strikeouts) in order to give an idea of what a player’s performance would look like if their outcomes had matched the probabilities based on their exit velocity and launch angle.
191 players have 75+ ABs this year. By MLB’s xwOBA, Bogaerts ranks 180th, with an expected .257 wOBA. Gordon and Dyson are right behind him at 182nd/183rd, while Polanco’s not far ahead, at 173rd, and then Aybar/Hamilton are at 166th/167th. Peraza, with a .280 expected wOBA, has the best mark of the seven lowest air-ball exit velocity guys, ranking 160th of the 191 players by xwOBA.
As a group, these seven are actually hitting .250/.306/.320 this year, with a .279 woBA/71 wRC+. That’s with Boagerts and his 113 wRC+ included. If you don’t hit the ball hard in the air, you don’t produce offensively. Bogaerts is currently getting good results out of a bad process. He’s hitting too many ground balls — his 59% GB% is a career high — to go along with his weak air ball contact, and his long history of hitting too many infield flies has carried over as well, adding some automatic outs to the ledger. This is not the batted ball profile of a guy who should have an above average batting line.
Even during his strong 2016 season, there were some reasons for concern. As Tony Blengino noted in his write-up on AL shortstops this winter:
Like many Red Sox regulars, Xander Bogaerts is helped greatly by Fenway Park. While his average fly-ball exit speed of 90 mph is quite solid, he hit a heaping helping of 85-95 mph flies that are outs in most parks. A bunch of those are wall-scrapers or better in Boston. His Unadjusted Fly Ball Contact Score of 124 is marked down significantly to 90 for context. In a development that has nothing to do with Fenway Park, Bogaerts hit .316 AVG-.337 SLG on grounders (172 Unadjusted Contact Score), though his grounder authority supported only a 118 mark. I’m also a bit concerned about his very high pop-up rate vis a vis his ordinary fly-ball rate. Love the youth, love the low K rate, but at this stage Bogaerts doesn’t quite belong in a Correa/Lindor discussion.
To Tony’s point, Bogaerts’ career splits show the way that he’s benefiting from Fenway Park, as he’s running a .136 ISO/.364 BABIP at home and a .106 ISO/.313 BABIP on the road. Drop the power and take the air out of his BABIP, and he goes from a .357 wOBA/117 wRC+ guy at Fenway to a .298 wOBA/87 wRC+ when the team isn’t playing in Boston.
Now, it’s never as simple as just looking at a player’s home/road stats and determining that his road numbers are what he really is, with the difference being the park factor. Bogaerts knows he’s playing in a park with a wall that rewards short flies to left, so it’s very likely that he, like every other right-handed hitter in Boston, has worked on his game to take advantage of the Green Monster. If Bogaerts played in a different park, perhaps he’d do things differently, and his results would change as well.
While playing in Boston, making a lot of contact and hitting a bunch of balls off the Green Monster isn’t a bad plan; this is basically how Dustin Pedroia came to be one of the league’s best players for the last 10 years.
But this is a very different player than the one Bogaerts looked like as a minor leaguer, and while he’s cut his strikeout rate down to Pedroia-esque levels so far this year, he’s still not making Pedroia-esque contact, and he probably can’t keep his K% at 10% with an 86% contact rate. If the strikeouts go up, Bogaerts is going to need to hit for power to offset them again.
And clearly, he should be able to. He averaged 92.5 mph on his balls in the air last year, roughly at league average, so having Dee Gordon’s batted ball authority isn’t the norm for him. He had 56 extra base hits last year. This is a kid who ran ISOs over .200 in the minors as a teenager, which is quite rare indeed. Scouts weren’t making up the idea that he had power.
But we’re now 2,113 plate appearances into Bogaerts career, and he has an ISO of .122. Instead of becoming Carlos Correa, justifying his existence at shortstop with thundering rockets off the bat, he’s become a solid enough defensive shortstop who hits like a guy who plays shortstop.
And yet, for all the issues we’ve just discussed, the reality is that Bogaerts has put up +9.7 WAR since the start of the 2015 season, ranking third among shortstops over the last couple of years. He’s a 24 year old middle infielder with a career wRC+ of 102, plus adds a bunch of value on the bases. And there’s still reason to think that there’s some power in there somewhere, even if he’s not tapping into it right now. Add even average power to the rest of his game and he’s a terrific overall player.
Bogaerts probably won’t keep slapping the ball like he has in the first month of the season, and perhaps his experiment in making more contact will lead to a better balance of batted-ball authority along with a reduced strikeout rate. But while Bogearts remains a good player, he’s a very different good player than I ever expected him to become, and it remains a bit confusing to see a guy who was hyped as a slugger spend a month hitting like Dee Gordon.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
He’s basically Jason Heyward, Shortstop
Jason Heyward’s 110 career wRC+ would rank 4th among active shortstops and 2nd among shortstops who have played at least two full seasons.
In other words – yes please
Timing is way off. Often late and hitting high opposite-field choppers over the first-baseman’s head. Appears, like Heyward, to be very anxious in the box
did not see much to discount the “product of fenway” hypothesis. pretty mediocre fielder too (-20 DRS, -0.6 UZR career). not much more than an average player at the end of the day, is he?
so much of his apparent value is tied up in the least dependable areas….babip, non-SB baserunning, positional adjustments….and so much of that seems either statistically unsustainable (babip) or physically unsustainable (i.e. athleticism/mobility has likely peaked already).
He’s sustained a > .350 BABIP since the beginning of 2015. I’m all about viewing BABIP (for pitchers and hitters) with significant suspicion, but at this point, I think it’s safe to say this is just who he is. The Green Monster has a lot to do with that, obviously.
He’s getting quite lucky this year, with a very limited authority and high grounder rate that screams for regression BABIP regression, but his prior years have demonstrated that this is an actual skill. A remarkably weird one, but still a skill.
And frankly, you’ve been harping on the same theme (Bogaerts is overrated and about to come crashing to earth) for almost four years. I agree that the warning bells you’re sounding are, in principle, reasonable. But at some point, you have to accept that your predictions just aren’t coming true.
hmm.
Bogaerts has been an average to slightly above average bat so far. That’s not better than I’ve ever predicted. It is a good deal less than most others (you?) have predicted. If anyone needs to accept their predictions aren’t true, I don’t see how it would be me.
He has put up better fielding and baserunning numbers than I expected, I’ll grant you that. We can debate the reliability and sustainability of those numbers and performance, of course.
As for BABIP, it’s not nearly as consistent as you make it seem, even using your artificial cutoff for recency and sustainability. I could make up my own artificial cutoff and note that in his last 600pa, he’s posted a .318babip to give him a 103wrc+. Suddenly your “sustainable .350babip guy” claim doesn’t look so strong.
Yikes this argument again? Cherry picking meaningless data points for babip is useless.
Your trying to claim that over his last 600 pa bogaerts has been roughly average, but in reality his wRC+ per month since last year has been:
111, 172, 119, 120, 56, 99 111
So in reality, he’s been a well above average hitter with one horrendous month (56 wRC+).
Right now, what your doing is not include his 172 wRC month in your sample while including his 52 wRC month to make a false claim based on gals narratives
wait, what, how am I the one that gets accused of cherry picking data in this convo?
Because one person can refer to the last three years of data after he broke out which is getting to be a long, solid sample size while you picked an arbitrary, smaller number that left out the strongest part of his last season. That’s why you’re the one cherry picking
actually he cherry picked 2.1yrs of data to come up with his .350+ babip number, a number which isn’t supported by either his career numbers or his last season’s worth of plate appearances.
credit where credit is due damaso has been more than fair towards mookie in the comments section over the years…
with xbox i understand everyones concern about the babip. it is a bit perplexing. but i mean dude is at 2100+ pa and has a career 340 babip and thats including his disastrous 2014 season and hes clearly become a remarkably better hitter since then. perhaps hes just a legit career 350 babip guy?
This argument is so tired. The arbitrary BABIP thresholds only appear they they suit Damaso’s desired narrative.
Cae in point:
Last year he criticized Cameron for thinking Betts (who would go on to post a 7+ WAR) season was a good all-star choice, advocating instead for Michael Saunders. Saunders at the time was sporting a BABIP 80 points above his career (.377 for the first half of 2016, under .300 for his career, on his way to a 1.4 WAR season), but we weren’t hearing about BABIP then.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/picking-the-2016-american-league-all-stars/
There’s nothing arbitrary about it.
Babip is crucial to looking forward and projecting how a player will do going forward. But a player doesn’t get docked points for his current performance for it.
Saunders and Bogaerts both deserved to go to the all-star game last year, regardless of their babip – but we knew that both were headed for regression going forward, thanks to what we know of babip, and they did just that.
Betts’ wRC+ rose by 19 points in the second half.
Damaso’s revising his prior bad takes. He said Betts should have been dropped from Cameron’s hypothetical ballot (see the link above):
“it’s not saunders who you want to boot out for beltran.
it’s mookie.”
what does mookie’s 2nd half wrc+ have to do with the all star game?
Betts’ performance from the point where Damaso argued he wasn’t a worthy all-star actually improved. It wasn’t “headed for regression” as claimed.
This is giving me ‘Starlin Castro the Cub’ flashbacks. A SS who produced a high avg at a very young age in MLB who may never grow into more.
Then again, his ages 22 and 23 seasons are very similar to that of Derek Jeter.
Good point. He’s almost Jeter (at that age) right now. If Bogaerts can keep 10-15 homers per year without the rest of his game regressing, he’s a lighter hitting, better defensive Jeter. Similar BB/K rates at that age, similar BABIPs, similar speed. It’s easy to forget that Jeter was a good/very good Shortstop for a long time, but was rarely a great one in any individual year. Jeter had only 4 seasons above 5.2 WAR. A 4-5 win season is a very good one, but not really elite. 18 players did better than 5.2 WAR last year.
Jeter’s magnificence was in sustained offensive success over a really long period (17 years) but not necessarily elite for more than a few seasons here and there (1998,1999, 2006, 2009).
Jeter’s career was quite solid, and Bogaerts could match it for the prime of his career with less offense if he keeps the defense about averag,e where it is now. I doubt he lasts 17 years of success, though.
Jeter is Larkin with an extra 5 seasons and far worse defense.
It’s hard to say any member of the Hall of Fame is underrated but it is amazing how people forget about him. I just looked him up to see if my memory was at all correct, and he really was an incredibly consistent, pretty much always placing between 10th and 20th in WAR for about 10 years. I think it’s because he never had a signature year and he was playing around the same time as Cal Ripken and Ozzie Smith but he was probably more consistent than Jeter (who nearly everyone thinks is a first ballot HoFamer).
Could this have anything to do with it? At least in April?
“I mean in April it’s not easy to hit home runs,” Bogaerts said. “You’re playing in Boston. I know the wall is right there but it’s pretty hard to hit in the cold in general. We’ll hit some home runs, especially when it starts warming up. Looking forward to a lot of home runs from a lot of guys.”
He continues:
“I mean the cold is good and bad for me,” he said. “The good part is that it helps me do a little bit less. My effort level goes down because it’s kind of cold. But when it warms up I start swinging a bit bigger. You feel stronger because of the sun and whatever. The cold is good because I just try to do more contact, don’t want to get jammed or off the end for my hands to feel pretty bad.”
Interesting at least…thoughts?
For what it’s worth he only hit 1 April HR last year. Could this be more of a 4-6 week intentional change in approach till the weather gets warmer? That’s what I was getting at.
It is pretty tough. Signed Eric Thames.
I’m not defending his comments, just saying that this seems to offer an explanation for why he’s essentially been a slap hitter. Will he hit for more power later in the summer? Who knows. But at least this doesn’t seem to be a permanent change in approach if his comments are to be believed.
The Red Sox booth has mentioned Xander’s approach several times so far this season. They say he gets pitched away a lot and does a great job on contact with two strikes. His 2 strike line this year is .310/.326/.381 – in 2016, it was a far more mortal .230/.288/.372
I seldom miss a pitch during Red Sox games and his approach has become exactly the same as the banjo hitters mentioned in the article. He is never opening up and making no effort to pull or even hit with power to the opposite field. Just tap the ball to the right side. It is not a pretty thing to watch.
You can’t really blame him. The team is still built upon the OBP mold of the former GM and coaching ranks of their system.
Lot of players who could’ve built their prospect resume offor of hitting flyballs (Cecchini ) never did, and the ones who made the most of it with taking pitches (Benentendi , Betts , Bogaerts) were primed into the lineup inmediately.
In-betweens like Shaw and Bradley had to reorganize their swing before getting a starting gig, so it may be more of what he was taught to do coming into the majors. So it maybe a situation where he will grow into his power, but it will take much longer as he is honed into hitting the way that has made him successful for already 8?? Pro years at this point.
He’s also a smart hitter. He’s very situational. And his launch angles are low so I don’t believe he’s ever going to lift the ball just to cheat over the green monster for homeruns. Combined with pitcher’s staYing outside, he’s playing to the best advantage he’s given. As more need for batting in runs will be needed if they don’t inprove, I can see him adjusting to it, albeit slower than most expected power hitters.
Cecchini tried hitting more flyballs, and it wrecked him. He’s the poster child for not tinkering with your swing too much.
His first at bat tonight: he gets three curves in a row and falls behind with two strikes. He gets one down and away that was a borderline strike at best, almost one hands a soft liner (and the word ‘liner’ overstates the exit velocity) into shallow center. It was impressive plate coverage, but this particular Sox team really needs more doubles power than it needs maximizing contact/minimizing Ks.
Except for the second half of last year, Bogaerts has been an opposite-field singles hitter since the beginning of 2015, and he’s racked up .300+ batting averages doing it. In the second half of 2016, you could see he sold out for power, trying to pull everything. Yeah, he got the HRs, but his average cratered, with lots of 6-3s and 5-3s.
The bigger problem for me with Bogaerts is the way he swings down at the ball. His bat just doesn’t stay in the zone long enough. For the life of me I can’t understand why he gets pitched outside consistently, where he can chop the ball to the right side, and not inside, where his swing plane ties him up completely. He just doesn’t have the quick wrists of a Mookie Betts to clean that pitch out and drive it to the left side of the diamond.
His swing planes bad, but he’s very smart to get ahead of the ball better, and has a good eye to keep away from inside off-plate pitches.
He creates a lot of IFFB but when he pulls it he does heavy damage . I think teams are okay with keepin the ball away from him to minimize damage , as he’s a much better hitter than people think. But has that almost Joe Mauer mentality that he never unleashes to give a pitcher a timing advantage.
Maybe he should try the Axe Bat.
The high BABIP is sustainable as long as he continues to lob outside pitches through the 3-4 hole. That is a strategy, not an accident. He reassembled his game after his disastrous second half in ’14 and he goes back to this style now and again until he feels he is back on his game.
Agreed. This seems like a conscious change in approach after his terrible 2014. Xander doesn’t over swing. He’s content pushing the ball the other way. He’s always struck me as a cerebral hitter. It’ll be interesting to see if he changes his approach later this season and going forward, given that Papi’s retirement leaves the Sox lineup starved for power. He may never be the superstar that was once envisioned but he remains a quality ballplayer.
Interestingly enough, a former prospects writer for Fangraphs, Dan Farnsworth, accurately forecast Bogaerts’ power struggles two years ago by focusing in his swing mechanics: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/correa-bogaerts-and-the-development-of-power/
Commentator Damaso has also written about this issue in the past along with a provocative hypothesis that Xander modified his swing and approach in response to his early struggles as a rookie, and those changes may have risen his floor as a hitter but at the expense of a lower ceiling.
Taken together, their insights might lead one to question some of the conventional wisdom from scouts and big league clubs about hitting prospects. As we all know, Dave Cameron compiles annually a list of the 50 top trade value-players, those who were rookie eligible make up a tiny share of those lists, and Dave relied upon input from front offices for those rankings. In 2013, only three rookie-eligible hitters made the list: Bogaerts (29) Buxton (28) and Profar (26).
I’m giving you an upvote but based on his relatively steady production at shortstop minus his rookie year while on his rookie deal bogaerts was probably not too far off of that spot in trade value. Now that I think about that it would be interesting to look at trade value articles from 3+ years ago and look and see how accurate they were and if there are any trends in the mistakes made.
Dave, love the article. It got me thinking, that since I’ve seen a ton of both Bogaerts and Ichiro Suzuki, would you see any comparisons there? I remember, when I was part of the unwashed masses in my 20s, I would occasionally get frustrated by Ichiro’s seeming resistance to employing the power that he would display in batting practice, but grew to learn and appreciate just what he did do. High contact rate, low K%, below average ISO, but producing studly WAR numbers (whether fWAR or bWAR). Is that too thin of a parallel in your mind? Not saying I think they’re the same players, but seeing some similar patterns. Thanks again!
He’s 3rd in WAR among SS only if you disqualify Corey Seager for not accumulating a full season of AB’s in 2015. Seager is ahead of him despite the lower playing time.
Red Sox are averaging 0.64 HR/game this season, compared to 1.28 HR/G last year. It’s not all Ortiz’s departure; Pedroia’s power is down this year, as is Mookie’s and Jackie Bradley’s. Maybe Bogaerts’s power outage is part of a team-wide problem, or a change in approach? Maybe someone moved the Green Monster back 20 feet during the offseason?
Sandoval was hurt. Red Sox have seen a better dose of pitchers in April than last year. Pedroia is aging. Bradley was hurt for a little bit. They aren’t a team that mashes greatly, even last year good pitchers did shut them down.
Think they need to be a little more agressive, but this lineup doesn’t really have anyone that you would give that task to. Just need a few weeks to figure out.
FWIW, Bogaerts usually starts off the season cold.
This would align with his numbers last season as he hit only 1 hr in April then hit 3-5 in each of the next 5 month.
Bogaerts grew up in Aruba and played ball in Curacao. Adjusting to April in Boston would not be easy, and I say that as someone who has frequented Aruba and met someone who played ball there with Bogaerts. He apparently is really bothered by the sting of the bat in cold weather, something he has spoken about.
Haters gonna hate. The bottom line is that he has somehow amassed almost 10 WAR in the past 2+ years. Whatever his approach is, it’s helping his team win. It’s also odd that some choose to predict a crushing regression given that much of his offensive value is based on his adjustments to the way he’s being pitched (viz. he chased a lot of sliders down and away early on and now he has better command of the outside half of the plate, getting a lot of hits to RF). Making adjustments is how good players stay good. If pitching him in was the answer, big league scouts and coaches would be instructing their pitchers to do exactly that. Based on his track record of adjusting, maybe they figure the safer risk is giving up the base-hit to RF, rather than the XBH to LF. One final thought: he wears #2 (and indulges in jump-throws to first from the hole) as an homage to his hero, Derek Jeter, a guy who made a long living off of hitting outside pitches to RF. I’m sure it’s heresy to compare anyone to Jeter but Bogaerts’s WAR figures (also in spite of lackluster D) are pretty comparable to Jeter’s at the same age.
Bogaerts career thus far have very much been that of adjustments. Awful rookie season (2014). He then tried trading power for contact and improving defense/baserunning then all of a sudden you have a 4.5 WAR player in 2015. Then he decided to add power and walks to his game in 2016 and the end result was another 4.5 WAR season, but in a more sustainable way.
Early in 2017 it looks like he has been hitting like 2015, but with more walks and less k’s. However with that said he also started 2016 with little power as well then went on a power surge.
That’s why it’s so hard to try to project bogaerts. His career has been one full of adjustments. The good news is he’s been an all star caliber player while making these adjustments
Yeah I suppose the dream is he finds an approach that works and refines it and maybe he could end up on that correa lindor level. Maybe not super likely but you can never have too many great players
Part of the problem for Bogaerts is that while his overall production has been good, it has lagged a much less heralded prospect in Mookie Betts and other young rivals at shortstop like Lindor and Correa. Bogaerts is being measured against those players and expectations based on his minor league numbers, and so there is a tendency to focus on where he has fallen short.
Bogaerts was horrible when he first played in Portland Maine. Fenway is tough for power in April. Ask mookie and Pedroia this year. He also had a terrible flue and has a bad thumb. Bogaerts has two swings, his RC line drive aproach and his pull power approach.
He was the worst hitter in baseball in his first full season shortly after a pull power surge. Went a few months with a 400 OPS. I think he learned to pick his spots for power, similar to Jeter. And when a cold wind is blowing in he doesn’t bother with his power swing. He is having a decent season so far doing just that. Its a lot better then a 400 OPS.
I sure hope that’s what it is. I don’t know that much about the coaching here and I haven’t seen Bogaerts play lately, so I am trying to stay out of this. But if you are running an ISO of .045 something is really wrong. That’s like Juan Pierre/Brendan Ryan territory. It’s mind-boggling that he can run an above-average offensive line producing almost no power like that.
There is obviously strong evidence and support of the ‘flyball revolution’ and there are quite a few examples of players who have been quite successful. Bogaerts, perhaps is one player who took things too far in the second half of last season in his flyball approach. He has shown incredible success hitting for a high average when he hits groundballs to all fields. He may be better off with this approach until he learns how to become a better power hitter. Can read more about my take here: http://www.fangraphs.com/community/the-2017-red-sox-season-ends-and-starts-with-bogaerts/