Brandon Belt Rightly Resists the Revolution

On Wednesday night, Brandon Belt came to the plate six times. He drew four walks, struck out once, and put one ball in play, a single in the 11th that drove in a run. Of course, the combination of all those walks and the relative lack of homers sometimes leads to spurious criticisms not unlike those leveled at Joey Votto. While most understand that Votto is a great hitter and many understand that what Belt does is good, Belt’s reputation likely suffers more than Votto’s for a few reasons.

  1. He’s not as good as Joey Votto.
  2. He hits relatively few homers for a first baseman.

As to that first point, there’s no shame in failing to rival Joey Votto. As to the second, it really is hard to overstate the effects of Belt’s home park. Despite what Barry Bonds might have led everyone to believe, it’s incredibly difficult to hit homers in San Francisco. Despite what Barry Bonds might have led everyone to believe, it’s even more incredibly difficult for lefties to homer there.

Brandon Belt isn’t without power. He has posted ISOs well above league average throughout his career. Since the beginning of 2015, his .226 ISO on the road is 23rd best in baseball among the 160 players who’ve recorded at least 500 away plate appearances. He’s within 10 points of Joey Votto; he’s right behind Josh Donaldson, Brian Dozier, and Daniel Murphy; and he’s just ahead of Miguel Cabrera and Jose Bautista. In 580 away plate appearances since the beginning of 2015 — roughly a season’s worth of playing time- – Belt has 28 home runs, having hit them at a greater rate than Kris Bryant and Paul Goldschmidt. His numbers are good in high-leverage and low-leverage situations. He’s good with runners on and the bases empty. He’s consistent, too, as the chart showing his 100-game rolling ISO shows.

He’s also never hit more than 18 homers in a season and doesn’t seem likely to do so this year. In addition, look at Belt’s ISO compared to first basemen as a whole the last few seasons.

Brandon Belt vs. Other First Basemen
Year Belt ISO 1B ISO
2013 .193 .176
2014 .206 .170
2015 .197 .192
2016 .199 .194
2017 .210 .208
Note: 2014 was a partial season for Belt

Belt’s power figures have remained roughly the same, even as the league around him has boosted its power. Belt’s overall offensive line has remained just as good relative to the rest of the league, however, thanks to an increase in walks. There has been much theorizing about the increase in offense over the last few years. One of the more prominent theories concerns the effects of ever higher launch angles, as hitters try to boost their power numbers by hitting the ball in the air more often.

Would that work for Belt? Probably not, actually. Not because he would lose something else as a hitter, but because it wouldn’t necessarily help him in San Francisco. Belt actually did hit more fly balls last season; his power numbers barely moved, though. As a lefty hitter hitting in a park that suppresses power — particularly for left-handed hitters — it’s not really clear that maximizing launch angle would provide Belt with much benefit.

It’s tough to show exactly how much worse it is for lefties to hit in San Francisco than in other parks, but it is probably best to start with park factor. The graph below shows the park factor for home runs by left-handed hitters. The higher the number, the easier it is to hit them out of the ballpark.

San Francisco is last by quite a bit. It’s a good park for triples, but those don’t really happen often enough to make a huge difference. And it’s still in the bottom third for doubles.

Going beyond park factor, we can see just how this problem plays out using Statcast. Baseball Savant now carries xwOBA as part of the available metrics. xwOBA utilizes exit velocity and launch angle to determine what the wOBA on any given play likely would have been. We can isolate by left-handed hitters and venue to get a better sense of what happens when lefties hit the ball in each park.

For this search, we will look at Barrels — that is, batted balls with the sort of launch angle and exit velocity that typically produces a batting average of at least .500 and slugging percentage of at least 1.500. Since the beginning of 2015, every park has seen around 200 barreled balls from left-handed batters. The average wOBA on these balls is 1.411 and the expected wOBA on these balls is 71 points lower, so across the league, lefties generally exceed their expected wOBA when they barrel a ball. The graph below shows the difference between expected wOBA and actual wOBA since 2015, with a higher number meaning batted balls are underperforming what we might expect.

In the smaller parks in Milwaukee and Cincinnati, the thin air of Colorado, and the notoriously short right field of Yankee Stadium, lefty hitters outperform their expected wOBA. Detroit is an average park for left-handers hitting homers, but is considerably more difficult for doubles. Kansas City is a hard park in which to homer, and the club’s defense might play a role there, as well. San Francisco is one of just three parks where barreled balls produce considerably worse results for lefties compared to the rest of baseball. The disparity is there for Giants hitters and their opponents.

To provide another perspective on the data above — and remove defense from the equation entirely — we can take all of the barreled balls by park and look at the percentage of those batted balls that go for homers. League average is 55% for left-handed batters.

It’s hard for lefties to hit homers in San Francisco. When a hitter barrels a ball in Yankee Stadium or Dodger Stadium, it goes out of the park two out of every three times. When it happens in San Francisco, it’s a homer roughly half as often. This is true both for the Giants and their opponents. Brandon Belt doesn’t hit a lot of homers because San Francisco doesn’t let him. It doesn’t allow any lefty — Barry Bonds excluded — to hit a lot of homers.

Brandon Belt is a good hitter with power. His walks have allowed him to keep pace with the rest of the league offensively, as increasing his power numbers would likely be a fool’s errand. Brandon Belt doesn’t hit for a high average or hit a lot of homers. He’s not fast on the bases. He doesn’t need to do any of that, however, to be very good. He walks a lot and he hits for power, even if the ball doesn’t leave the yard. That’s all he needs to do to be one of the top-25 hitters in baseball.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JDX
6 years ago

I’d like to see Belt, Votto, and Yelich on a Rockies team… one of those guys would have a .500 BABIP for a season, I bet!

Joe
6 years ago
Reply to  JDX

Remember Belt plays 10 games in Coors a year, and over 153 total career plate attempts, his BAIP is .402

Votto in Coors (106 PA): BIAP of .435
Yelich in Coors (59 PA): BAIP of .364

Here is the top-10 list for career BAIP of guys with more than 100 PA in Coors Field:
1. David Dahl (.422 in 120 PA)
2. John Mabry (.422 in 152 PA)
3. Sean Burroughs (.421 in 117 PA)
4. Freddy Sanchez (.416 in 130 PA)
5. Rafel Ynoa (.415 in 117 PA)
6. J.T. Snow (.414 in 224 PA)
7. J.D. Drew (.410 in 108 PA)
8. Derek Bell (.410 in 109 PA)
9. Gabe Kapler (.409 in 148 PA)
10. Michael Tucker (.409 in 144 PA)

Of course BAIP does not stabalize until 820 balls put in play [http://www.fangraphs.com/library/principles/sample-size/], so all of the above “leaders” are likely due to some SSS luck factor. If you narrow down the leader-board to guys with more than 820 balls in play you only get Rockies players since the most careers aren’t long enough to get that many hits in an away ballpark.

1. Garrett Atkins (.341 in 1513 PA)
2. Troy Tulowitzki (.340 in 2249 PA)
3. Nefi Perez (.333 in 1619 PA)
4. Vinny Castilla (.330 in 2100 PA)
5. Clint Barmes (.304 in 1165 PA)
6. Nolan Arenado (.303 in 1246 PA)

Joe
6 years ago
Reply to  Joe

Actually, this is very interesting all of a sudden to me…

The Rockies don’t even make the list for the highest BAIP at home since Coors Field opened. In front of them are:
1. Florida (.304)
2. Yankees (.303)
3. Detroit (.303)
4. Pittsburgh (.302)
5. Angels (.301)

Dominikk85member
6 years ago
Reply to  JDX

Wouldn’t coors help s flyball hitter more?

Joe
6 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Yes, and no. Coors field is really such a hitters park because of how big the outfield is. It is the largest square footage of ground to cover for outfielders by quite a bit actually…Coors is nearly one-third of an acre bigger than Fenway!

sadtrombonemember
6 years ago
Reply to  Joe

Coors Field is a real blast. Lots of triples. I love triples. Give me more ballparks with triples, please.

pg_780
6 years ago
Reply to  Joe

But wouldn’t shorter distance fences make it even MORE of a hitters park? Coors helps fly ball hitters immensely fwiw