Yankees Bolster Bullpen With David Bednar, Jake Bird, and Camilo Doval

As Thursday’s 6 PM deadline approached, the New York Yankees finally made their big bullpen moves, first trading for closer David Bednar from the Pittsburgh Pirates and sending back catcher Rafael Flores, catcher Edgleen Perez, and outfielder Brian Sanchez. Bednar, with a year of arbitration remaining next season, has allowed a 2.37 ERA and a 1.96 FIP while striking out 51 batters and walking only 10 in 38 innings this year.
Also donning (non-purple) pinstripes is Jake Bird, whom the Yankees acquired from the Colorado Rockies in exchange for second baseman Roc Riggio and left-handed starter Ben Shields. Bird, in his fourth year with the Rockies, has a 4.73 ERA for the season, but a much sunnier 3.45 FIP, and he has struck out nearly 11 batters per nine innings, easily the best mark of his career.
But that wasn’t quite enough for the Yankees, and as the clock approached the top of the hour, they picked up Camilo Doval from the San Francisco Giants for three prospects: catcher-third baseman Jesus Rodriguez, right-handed starter Trystan Vrieling, and first baseman Parks Harber.
Seemingly every interesting reliever on a non-contending team was traded this week, so it was only a matter of time until the Yankees jumped in, especially given that the first-place Blue Jays hadn’t been sitting around twiddling their thumbs. The Yankees bullpen hasn’t been an utter disaster, but it’s been one of their weaker units in recent years, with an ERA and FIP both on the wrong side of four. The Steamer/ZiPS depth chart projections were relatively happy with the front three or four members of the bullpen, anchored by Devin Williams, but saw real weakness at the back end.
After a brutal start to the season, Williams temporarily lost the closer job, getting it back after a Luke Weaver hamstring injury. Since returning to closing games, Williams has been generally effective, with a 3.66 ERA and 2.84 FIP while converting 12 of 13 save opportunities. But he’s been rockier over the last week, with a blown save on Wednesday and several less-than-clean escapes. Weaver, one of last year’s key pitchers down the stretch, has struggled since coming back from injury. Against this backdrop, it’s not the least bit surprising to see the Yankees add relief help. None of these new relievers are free agents at the end of the season, so New York is playing the long game here.
Few, if any, relievers have restored their value over the last three months as much as Bednar. After two All-Star appearances in 2022 and 2023, Bednar was so brutal last year that he lost his closing job late in the season to Aroldis Chapman, and an awful opening series against the Marlins this year resulted in a demotion to Triple-A Indianapolis. Since coming back, he’s relied on his usually effective curveball more than ever, and is arguably having the best season of his career. The Pirates are sellers and have about as much actual need for a veteran closer as a cat has for a laptop.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 4 | 3.45 | 59 | 0 | 57.3 | 46 | 22 | 6 | 19 | 69 | 120 | 0.7 |
David Bednar
| Percentile | ERA+ | ERA | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 220 | 1.88 | 2.0 |
| 90% | 190 | 2.18 | 1.7 |
| 80% | 156 | 2.64 | 1.3 |
| 70% | 139 | 2.97 | 1.1 |
| 60% | 130 | 3.17 | 0.9 |
| 50% | 120 | 3.45 | 0.7 |
| 40% | 108 | 3.81 | 0.4 |
| 30% | 100 | 4.14 | 0.2 |
| 20% | 88 | 4.67 | -0.1 |
| 10% | 77 | 5.36 | -0.5 |
| 5% | 63 | 6.58 | -1.0 |
Since the Yankees are getting a full year on top of the stretch drive, the prospects sent to Pittsburgh are good ones. Edgleen Perez was ranked sixth in our updated Yankees prospect rankings before the trade, and while his power has yet to really develop, he has very good plate discipline and can hit his fair share of hard line drives. As a 19-year-old catcher, it would be a bad idea to take his seasonal line too seriously, and the Pirates will no doubt be patient given that he’s likely to stick at the position. Eric Longenhagen notes that Perez remains especially vulnerable to secondary pitches thrown outside.
Whereas Perez’s fate requires some projection and speculation, Rafael Flores is probably nearly the player he’s destined to become. He has followed up a 152 wRC+ at two levels last year with a 146 wRC+ and 15 homers in 87 games for Double-A Somerset this year. ZiPS throws out names like Phil Nevin and A.J. Hinch as offensive comps, among others. Defense, on the other hand, is a different story. He’s not a complete liability behind the plate, but defense is far from his forte. Eric has described Flores to me as a “viable, but flawed, big league fit,” who teams will run on a lot due to a strong, but inaccurate arm that hasn’t made progress. This means he might end up catching in Pittsburgh, but likely as part of a tandem, not someone you send out there 120 times a year.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .233 | .303 | .404 | 446 | 52 | 104 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 65 | 42 | 151 | 4 | 97 | 1.3 |
| 2027 | .235 | .307 | .407 | 442 | 53 | 104 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 66 | 43 | 145 | 3 | 99 | 1.5 |
| 2028 | .234 | .306 | .408 | 436 | 52 | 102 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 66 | 43 | 140 | 3 | 99 | 1.5 |
| 2029 | .233 | .308 | .410 | 424 | 51 | 99 | 21 | 0 | 18 | 64 | 43 | 134 | 3 | 100 | 1.5 |
| 2030 | .230 | .305 | .403 | 409 | 49 | 94 | 20 | 0 | 17 | 61 | 42 | 127 | 2 | 98 | 1.3 |
| 2031 | .229 | .306 | .402 | 388 | 46 | 89 | 19 | 0 | 16 | 56 | 40 | 120 | 2 | 98 | 1.2 |
Brian Sanchez hasn’t gotten a lot of attention from scouts, but he’s yet to hit a wall offensively and has solid enough speed and a frame that suggests that there could at least be some power/speed upside. He’s improved his contact rate in each of his three minor league seasons, going from 57% to 68% to 77%, and he does get on base. The Florida State League is a long way from the NL Central, though, and he’s been slow to advance through the minors. Even so, Sanchez is worth watching the next few years.
As was the case with Bednar — and also Doval, whom we’ll get to in a moment — Bird struggled last season after a strong 2023, and also like the other two, he’s rebounded in the current campaign. Earlier in the season, Bird was looking a lot like he might end up as the token Rockies All-Star, sitting at a 1.41 ERA in mid-June. He’s had a rough time of it since, allowing 22 earned runs over his last 15 innings, an absolutely abysmal run. While nothing can completely absolve such a performance, opponents have touched Bird up for a ridiculous .448 BABIP during that stretch; no professional pitcher’s actual skill level is that bad. The Yankees probably won’t throw him into high-leverage situations right away — and considering they now have no fewer than four closers, they don’t need to use him there — but there’s nothing so obviously broken about Bird that he shouldn’t be counted as crucial middle-inning depth. And given Bird’s early success, the Yankees have a lot of potential upside here, even more so when you consider their track record of improving relief pitchers after bringing them over from other organizations. It wouldn’t at all be surprising if New York’s pitching gurus have some notes for Bird, who isn’t eligible to reach free agency until after the 2028 season.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3 | 2 | 3.96 | 59 | 0 | 75.0 | 64 | 33 | 7 | 30 | 78 | 104 | 0.4 |
| 2027 | 3 | 2 | 3.95 | 56 | 0 | 70.7 | 60 | 31 | 6 | 28 | 72 | 105 | 0.3 |
| 2028 | 2 | 3 | 4.05 | 52 | 0 | 66.7 | 58 | 30 | 6 | 27 | 67 | 102 | 0.2 |
Jake Bird
| Percentile | ERA+ | ERA | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 157 | 2.63 | 1.7 |
| 90% | 138 | 2.99 | 1.3 |
| 80% | 126 | 3.29 | 1.0 |
| 70% | 116 | 3.55 | 0.7 |
| 60% | 110 | 3.76 | 0.5 |
| 50% | 104 | 3.96 | 0.4 |
| 40% | 97 | 4.24 | 0.1 |
| 30% | 90 | 4.59 | -0.2 |
| 20% | 83 | 4.97 | -0.5 |
| 10% | 74 | 5.58 | -0.8 |
| 5% | 68 | 6.05 | -1.2 |
Roc Riggio hasn’t really been a favorite of scouts or on other prospect lists, though Eric currently evaluates him as a 45 FV, which is real prospect territory. All Riggio has done is hit this season, and ZiPS already thinks he’s good enough to be a role player in the majors. Here’s what Eric said about Riggio in his updated report following the trade:
Riggio became famous when he committed to UCLA ridiculously early (he was in eighth grade). He didn’t end up a Bruin and instead matriculated to Oklahoma State, where he hit very well for two years as he embraced a sort of grinder/heel persona. He ended up slashing .316/.438/.601 in two seasons for the Cowboys, then .221/.349/.397 with 11 home runs and 27 steals at High-A Hudson Valley in his first full season. He hit his way to Double-A Somerset in 2025 and was slashing a robust .264/.370/.567 at the time he was traded for Jake Bird. Lefty-hitting infielders with this kind of bat speed are uncommon, and the Yankees made changes to Riggio’s swing (he has a much bigger leg kick now) that have made it more athletic and seem to have positively impacted his plate coverage. He’s been more dangerous than vulnerable against pitches out away from him this year, and had a 55% hard hit rate around he midway point of the summer. Riggio is no slouch as a defender, either, even though he is likely limited to second base. His surface stats are a caricature of his true talent because the hitting environments at Hudson Valley and Somerset are favorable, but this is still an “arrow up” prospect who is starting to look like a potential everyday second baseman.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .219 | .307 | .405 | 375 | 56 | 82 | 20 | 4 | 14 | 56 | 41 | 103 | 8 | 88 | 0.6 |
| 2027 | .224 | .312 | .412 | 393 | 60 | 88 | 21 | 4 | 15 | 60 | 43 | 104 | 8 | 91 | 0.8 |
| 2028 | .228 | .315 | .422 | 403 | 62 | 92 | 22 | 4 | 16 | 63 | 44 | 103 | 8 | 95 | 1.0 |
| 2029 | .230 | .319 | .417 | 391 | 61 | 90 | 22 | 3 | 15 | 62 | 44 | 98 | 8 | 95 | 1.0 |
| 2030 | .232 | .321 | .421 | 380 | 60 | 88 | 21 | 3 | 15 | 60 | 43 | 94 | 7 | 96 | 1.1 |
| 2031 | .235 | .323 | .423 | 362 | 57 | 85 | 20 | 3 | 14 | 56 | 41 | 89 | 6 | 97 | 1.0 |
Drafted in 2024 but already 26 years old, Ben Shields is an older prospect, but he’s had success since joining the professional ranks, striking out 179 batters in 141 2/3 innings. It’s worth noting he missed a good chunk of this season due to a hip injury, but he’s been good when he has been on the mound. He only has two pitches — a lively fastball and a slider, which he has trouble throwing for strikes — and he’ll need to develop a third to stick as a starter moving forward. Still, he does have the makings of a good lefty out of the bullpen.
Like Bednar, Doval was an All-Star in 2023 who is pitching well again after a dreadful performance last season. The former Giants fireballer is not quite back to where he was two years ago, as he’s still walking a few too many batters and his strikeout rate has dropped, but simplifying his arsenal — he’s mostly jettisoned the sinker at this point and is almost exclusively slider/cutter — has shored up his command a bit. No matter how good, a closer with a knack for allowing ball fours is a good source of baseball-induced anxiety.
It would have been almost unthinkable for San Francisco to be sellers a month ago, but losing 13 of 16 games heading into the deadline clarified the team’s situation in a bad way. The Giants also traded sidearmer Tyler Rogers to the Mets, but they still have Randy Rodríguez and Ryan Walker at the top of the pen, and they picked up José Buttó in the Rogers deal.
With Doval added, along with Bednar and Bird, the Yankees built nearly half of a top-notch bullpen in just three hours. In rest-of-season projections, ZiPS had the Yankees bullpen ranked 17th in the league overall on Thursday morning. These three trades bumped them all the way up to third! As an added bonus, Doval is under club control for two more seasons after this one.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5 | 4 | 3.58 | 66 | 0 | 65.3 | 50 | 26 | 5 | 31 | 74 | 115 | 0.7 |
| 2027 | 5 | 4 | 3.50 | 65 | 0 | 64.3 | 49 | 25 | 5 | 29 | 72 | 118 | 0.7 |
Camilo Doval
| Percentile | ERA+ | ERA | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 185 | 2.23 | 2.1 |
| 90% | 162 | 2.54 | 1.7 |
| 80% | 139 | 2.96 | 1.3 |
| 70% | 128 | 3.23 | 1.0 |
| 60% | 121 | 3.40 | 0.8 |
| 50% | 115 | 3.58 | 0.7 |
| 40% | 108 | 3.83 | 0.4 |
| 30% | 98 | 4.20 | 0.1 |
| 20% | 91 | 4.53 | -0.2 |
| 10% | 77 | 5.38 | -0.8 |
| 5% | 68 | 6.04 | -1.2 |
The big question with Jesus Rodriguez is where he’ll end up actually playing. He’s a catcher by trade, but it doesn’t look like he’s going to do enough with the glove to be a full-timer there. The problem is, he’s not going to displace Matt Chapman at third, leaving his most likely path to the majors in San Francisco as a backup or emergency catcher who plays the other four corners as well.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .261 | .327 | .368 | 437 | 56 | 114 | 18 | 4 | 7 | 47 | 39 | 83 | 11 | 98 | 1.3 |
| 2027 | .260 | .325 | .367 | 447 | 57 | 116 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 49 | 40 | 82 | 11 | 97 | 1.3 |
| 2028 | .258 | .325 | .365 | 449 | 57 | 116 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 49 | 41 | 80 | 11 | 96 | 1.3 |
| 2029 | .259 | .328 | .367 | 417 | 54 | 108 | 18 | 3 | 7 | 46 | 39 | 73 | 9 | 98 | 1.3 |
| 2030 | .257 | .326 | .365 | 381 | 48 | 98 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 42 | 36 | 66 | 8 | 96 | 1.2 |
| 2031 | .261 | .331 | .377 | 337 | 43 | 88 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 32 | 59 | 7 | 101 | 1.2 |
Trystan Vrieling looks like he may stick as a starter; he has solid command but rather underwhelming stuff. While he hasn’t been beat up in Double-A this year, he’s also allowed a contact rate over 80%, which isn’t what you want to see from a pitching prospect. If a command guy can’t punch out a bunch of Double-A hitters with his secondary pitches, he’s certainly not going to be able to do so in the majors. Still, the Giants can certainly use the depth. ZiPS gives Vrieling a good chance to be a usable fifth starter type but without much upside.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5 | 7 | 4.56 | 20 | 18 | 94.7 | 101 | 48 | 11 | 32 | 67 | 86 | 0.7 |
| 2027 | 6 | 6 | 4.32 | 20 | 18 | 98.0 | 102 | 47 | 10 | 31 | 69 | 91 | 0.9 |
| 2028 | 6 | 6 | 4.22 | 20 | 18 | 100.3 | 103 | 47 | 10 | 31 | 72 | 94 | 1.1 |
| 2029 | 6 | 6 | 4.10 | 20 | 18 | 101.0 | 102 | 46 | 9 | 31 | 72 | 96 | 1.2 |
| 2030 | 6 | 6 | 4.10 | 20 | 18 | 101.0 | 102 | 46 | 9 | 31 | 72 | 96 | 1.2 |
| 2031 | 6 | 6 | 4.15 | 20 | 18 | 99.7 | 101 | 46 | 9 | 31 | 70 | 95 | 1.2 |
Parks Harber certainly has the appearance of a classic grip-it-and-rip-it power hitter, and he played football in high school, but his power really isn’t where it needs to be to put him on the prospect map. As an undrafted free agent, he’s been promoted conservatively, and his 156 wRC+ this year in High-A has to be taken with a huge pile of salt given that he turns 24 before the end of the season. He’s worth a follow as he advances through the system, but he probably has a steeper uphill climb to pop up on San Francisco’s roster someday than either Rodriguez or Vrieling.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Impressive work by NYY. When Jake Bird is your 8th RP and in danger of being booted off the team when Leiter and Cruz return from injury your bullpen is deep.
Boone has said he’s keeping Williams in the closer role. We’ll see.
Since this looks like it’ll be the last article of the day, kudos to all the writers here today summing up each move. It was a fantastic day of baseball and you guys killed it.
I’m stunned the Yankees were able to improve the bullpen this significantly without touching their top 2 hitters (Jones/Lombard) or 3 SPs (Schlittler, Lagrange, ERC). Props to Cashman for navigating this deadline so effectively.
If this was the best the Yankees could do for Bednar, they should have just kept him. Surprising no one, BC looks to have made another turd of a trade.
Lol I thought you meant Cashman. You can’t use initials when these two teams trade
D’oh my bad. Clearly botched the team name and shouldn’t use initials.
According to the PPG, the Bucs asking price (according to multiple different FOs) was a minimum of a top five prospect on Tuesday. And the price rose to them asking for a top 75 prospect in baseball. And according to Cherington, they liked this return better.
Now…this type of information is revealed post deadline if other teams missed out on a player, so I’d usually take it with a grain of salt. But Cheringtons comments basically verify it. And if they chose this return, it’s typically foolish of him.
Given Rodriguez and Flores’ defensive concerns, the player id be most excited about is Riggio. Power from 2B is rare and if he can play palatable defensive I think he’s a reasonable starter for a non-contender. Would be curious to see if Colorado sends him to AAA.
Every single team’s front office that just gave the Yankees excellent controllable relievers for their spare parts deserves to be fired.
You know how fans will go online and propose homer type trades where they say “what if we traded all of these extra parts that don’t fit for your team’s player that we really want?” And everyone else’s fans laugh at them? The Yankees made all of those trades.
Just an absolutely ludicrous outcome. Why did the Rockies, Pirates, and Giants agree to this? I know the answer to at least the first two is “they are bad at this” but I still don’t get it. Maybe because understand would drive me mad, like viewing one of the Lovecraftian Great Old Ones?
For the Rockies, it’s because Riggio is legit pretty good. He’s the best player they gave up.
For the Pirates, it’s probably because they trust the Yankees’ catcher factory far more than anything they could do.
And for the Giants, Buster Posey probably saw they had a catcher batting over .300 and said “Sold!”
MLB The Show would have been embarrassed by the Pirates return. While I get that teams value players differently, there’s nothing about Edgleen that says this guy is verging on a breakout. And Flores could be yet another AAAA bat.
It’s better than it looks at first glance, which is an incredibly low bar but I think I might have underestimated Flores when it was first announced. It’s still not a great returns, but I think he’s more like a 45 or maybe a 45+ than a 40+.
Flores is probably better than an FV40+. The power-over-hit catcher is a type, and I think we mostly don’t like them because they’re also often bad defenders (e.g., Langeliers, Perez, Hunter Goodman) but if he was like Danny Jansen but not hurt all the time? I think that’s kind of what we’re looking at as a good but reasonable outcome. That guy gives you 3 wins over about 450 PAs. That’s like a 50? You’re right, he could very well be not that, but I think he’s got a reasonable chance to be it.
The rest is just filler. I don’t believe in teenage catchers unless they are absolutely killing it in full season ball, and Perez is not doing that. He’s probably a 35+, and I can’t imagine Brian Sanchez is higher than that either.
Before the trade, I had said that the Pirates really should walk out of there with one FV50 prospect and an FV40+ or two FV45+ prospects, plus maybe a lottery ticket. For example, I think Alex Freeland would have been fair; so would Edwin Arroyo and Cam Collier.
Using that standard, they clearly fall short and it’s definitely not a good trade, but it’s not quite as awful as I thought. I think you could make an argument for Flores as a 45+, but it’s a stretch. If they had gotten Riggio in addition to what they got, two 45s isn’t that bad. But they didn’t.
It makes me wonder what the other offers were. The Mariners have Harry Ford totally blocked and were buying relievers. The Red Sox were buying relievers and The Password is totally blocked, he and Connelly Early would have been fair. The Tigers needed relievers so badly, I think Thayron Liranzo could have been on the table. Liranzo and Ford are better prospects than Flores and of the same type…
I mean the Blue Jays traded Alan Roden and Kendry Rojas, both of whom have a real claim for FV50, for Louis Varland.
I would also add that Yankees catchers consistently show up as better defenders than their scouting reports suggest – some sort of framing devil magic!
Liranzo probably would have been on the table. Or maybe a combo of Troy Melton and Max Anderson!
I kind of wonder if he stuck to his demands and other contenders headed elsewhere. He also takes for-freaking-ever to make a decision and seems by nature so indecisive about major moves, this move is also still in character.
Honestly, his record is comically bad in trades and it will get worse with this. EL was very diplomatic in his chat today (paraphrasing: hard to call for someone’s job who is so underfunded), and I’m sorry…but that excuse doesn’t cut the mustard. There’s a bunch of teams who are more competitive and also underfunded: Milwaukee, Cleveland, Tampa. Some of those are more funded because…they’re better at development to begin with!
The difference is that in those places the scouting and analytics departments are very well funded. It’s one thing to be cheap on player payroll, and another to be cheap on both player payroll and the people whose job it is to find those overlooked guys.
I used to think the Pirates are in a very similar position to the Athletics, where both teams have some good people in the front office who didn’t have the sorts of investment in their work to take full advantage of it. If you took a look at the A’s front office page a few years ago their analytics department was like 5 people, and the Giants at the time had something like 17. This might be true for the Pirates, but this deadline is making me think maybe they are bad at their jobs.
Cherington made a big point of talking about how much they spent in R&D in the last offseason. And he’s continually talked up their analytics department. They’re just bad at evaluation and development. He’s worse than Dave Littlefield.
The Yankees have completely figured out the system. Nobody cares if you don’t develop impact talent because if you pump out a million pitchers and catchers, you will always have ammo at the trade deadline.
Flores was an UDFA, and Perez was signed for $50K out of Venezuela. And they’ve probably already found five more of these guys to trade next year!
And yes, I am going to gloat about how every comment I saw, here and otherwise, said the Yankees couldn’t possibly get an impact player without Lombard/Jones/Schlittler, but they got three great relievers without even needing to trade Ben Hess.
While the Yankees did well, saying they got 3 great relievers is a bit much.
I think Benard fits that description. Though we’ve also seen the bad of Benard just last year.
But Bird has a career 4.14 FIP and has been worse in his career outside of Coors Field (4.58 vs 3.78 FIP). And while Dan did his best to spin Bird’s recent struggles, he also has a very high FIP of late. So it’s not all about BABIP. Overall, I’d classify Bird as average to below-average.
Then there’s Doval. SF fans don’t seem upset about losing him at all. He seems like the type that could easily falter in the bright lights of NY. He’s also pitched poorly throughout his career on the road (2.08 home FIP vs 4.52 road). So a lot of his success appears to be tied to Oracle Park. I’d still classify him as above average but there’s also a lot of risk with him.
Thanks for the downvotes. And right now I’m laughing at every single one of you. BTW, I love how not one of the cowards who gave me a downvote could dispute a single thing I said. And while it was only one game that was pretty embarrassing for y’all.
Good point. I was always annoyed with how many catchers were on top prospect lists, but this goes to show how valuable catching prospects are.
Jake Bird will also be the first true test of the Yankees newfound tolerance towards facial hair…..
Maybe I’m letting Pittsburgh’s overall poor deadline get to me, but I am very underwhelmed by the return for Bednar. He’s been great for 4 out of the last 5 years and has another year of control. And the one year he was bad he was hurt coming out of training camp and possibly tipping pitches (if you believe Trevor May.)
I am disappointed the Pirates couldn’t get a single top 100 prospect in return, especially when you compare it to some of the other reliever deals this deadline.
Which reliever returned a top 100 prospect other than Mason Miller?
This is a bit of beauty being in the eye of the beholder, but I would make the argument that Kohl Drake, Kendry Rojas, Khal Stephen (recently upgraded to FV50 by Eric) are all FV50. Alan Roden was an FV50 as well.
But those are all pitchers, and I think the Pirates might have gotten boxed in a bit by preconceived notions about what they needed.
Drake and Stephen didn’t come back for relievers, though you could argue that Bednar should’ve been at least as valuable as Kelly or Bieber, especially given Bieber’s contract situation.
…sorry but we don’t make nearly enough Bieber puns. Bieber is a monster but he’s in recovery and the Guardians decided not to hold on to him but one bad day could be a heartbreaker for the Jays who need to pray that Bieber’s season doesn’t turn out all bad or he’ll stay and they’ll be singing “Stuck with U.” Honest, the reason we don’t make enough Bieber puns is that his songs have totally forgettable titles. Leo Morgenstern did “Bieber Decides To Stay” when he signed his new contract and had to spend the whole first paragraph explaining the Justin Bieber joke.
Anyway it is disappointing that the Pirates couldn’t pull a 45 with all the relievers they had. Feels like they overplayed their hand and wound up settling, and maybe should’ve been able to get something out of e.g. Detroit.
Oh yeah, I misread that–I didn’t see maguro specified “relievers.”
I do think the need for bats was a big part of it. Every time a team got connected to a Pirate available for trade, I’d go to their prospect list here. If the Pirates were specifically looking for a batter with a projected arrival in 2026, which they need if they hope to contend with Skenes, there weren’t that many in the teams’ top 10. Holding Keller and with Chandler arriving, it really would not move them forward to bring in more pitching. Restricting the return to near-MLB-ready bats would have limited the potential return, but personally, I feel like that was the move to try.
Not that I really expect it all to work out, of course. They’re still the Pirates.
If they wanted to trade from a surplus to net an impact bat, they should have put Chandler on the table.
Haven’t seen a good challenge trade in a while. Chandler for Basallo, who says no?
(Probably the Pirates but I think it could be great for everyone)
Hard to not feel that way looking at the return. Maybe Flores becomes the next Agustin Ramirez but he seems more likely to be a AAAA bat with poor defense. Really really poor return. Maybe time will prove us wrong, but as we sit here right now, it does not look good for the Pirates.
This was an awful deadline for the Pirates on two levels, maybe three:
1) on a tactical level, it looks like they did not get significant talent back. This is not really a surprise given how poor Cherington’s front office has been at talent evaluation, but it is disappointing nonetheless. It isn’t usually a bad idea to trade a reliever at the deadline and Bednar might implode again before next deadline, but the return is underwhelming for sure.
2) On a strategic level, the Pirates not only got worse for this year (fine they weren’t going anywhere anyway), but also got worse for next year, and didn’t appreciably improve their chances for ‘27 or ‘28 either. They have Skenes cheap for a limited time and they are absolutely squandering it. And in the meantime they kept three guys who could have value as useful depth, and therefore could have fetched something back, but instead get to clog up the roster for the rest of the year. It’s just an egregious misuse of resources.
3) The above is based on the concept that the goal of a baseball team is to maximize either present or future wins. This deadline provides evidence that the Pirates FO is not trying to do either. For fans of the team, that is incredibly disheartening, if not outright infuriating.
If I am being completely honest, I think the entire front office should be fired.
I have never thought that Cherington was so bad that he should be fired, despite a lot of very questionable decisions and a complete inability to develop hitters. They have found some real gems, especially on the pitching side, and he inherited an organization that was super low on talent across the board.
But somehow IKF is still on the team, as are Tommy Pham, Andrew Heaney, and Dennis Santana. They clearly took a lower return on Bednar because they wanted position players, probably a much lower return, and in doing so acquired an adequate catching prospect. But the last two catchers of the future are still there, plus Joey Bart, despite the Padres calling up everyone and offering craziness for a catcher (Preller got it with Freddy Fermin).
Maybe there are literally not enough people in the front office to take phone calls from interested parties but the inaction at the deadline is bad enough without the Bednar deal. This cannot be the best deal they received.
I gave Cherington the benefit of the doubt for years, but he lost me this winter, and he didn’t save himself this deadline. And drafting Cervantes in rd 2 and not signing him… I just don’t see any semblance of a plan, of a vision, or of any indication that they know what they’re doing. Again, presuming that they are trying to put a competitive team on the field, which feels really questionable.
Maybe there weren’t great offers for Heaney or IKF, but it sure doesn’t look like they were being terribly picky about their returns.
Also, not that I feel too bad for these guys, but for those three vets, it has to suck. You likely know the situation when you sign with the Bucs: play ok, get traded to a team who is in it. And yet you’re stuck here because BC couldn’t get his thumb out of his ass to dial the phone.
They should be and Cherington should been shown the door with Shelton. Coming off a somewhat positive vibes season with Skenes and Jones, they did nearly nothing this offseason outside of trading for a platoon 1B with a broken wrist. And when the season got off to a bad start and their lack of depth was exposed (because they’re so bad at development), Shelton was given his walking papers. In an interview post Shelton firing, Nutting said he didn’t want to fire Cherington because he didn’t want to give up on 2025 and start over. Give up? The season was toast by Mother’s Day.
Was the talent super low on talent? He had three guys from the last regime he signed long term who weren’t without talent. He had Cruz, who the entire industry believed couldn’t play SS, but Cherington knew better. He had Marte/Musgrove/Bell/Taillon who he…turned into Bednar and Endy Rodriguez, whose elbow has fallen off and sucked at the MLB level when he’s been healthy.
He takes forever to make decisions, and I think it’s paralysis by analysis. Lucking into Skenes, and having some decent development successes on the mound with Jones and Keller as well as some promising bats in KG and Florentino shouldn’t save his sorry ass. Unfortunately (but unsurprisingly) Nutting chose wrong between BC and Matt Arnold (the other finalist).