Yes, Pennants Can Be Lost in April

Katie Stratman-Imagn Images

When looking at most April stats, especially the basic ones, I spend a lot of time issuing disclaimers about small sample sizes. After all, any player can do just about anything in 25 or 50 or 100 plate appearances. I’m pretty confident that Joey Wiemer is not going to end the season as the NL MVP, and that Hunter Barco won’t finish the season with the worst WAR in major league history. But conversely, when we’re talking about standings, even if bad/good starts shouldn’t necessarily overconcern us about a player’s future, when it comes to teams, playoffs are determined by wins, which are cumulative numbers with razor-sharp margins. It’s not the end of the world if Cal Raleigh, because of his slow start, finishes with 38 homers instead of his projected 41 (ZiPS DC), but it may doom the Mariners if they underperform their projections by three wins.

The season is just a week old, but there are already sizable impacts in playoff probabilities around the league. To demonstrate this, I ran ZiPS overnight to get the updated playoff odds, so I could compare them to the preseason projections. Six teams have seen their playoff odds change by at least five percentage points. Here’s the full table, as things stand on Friday morning.

ZiPS Playoff Projections – Entering April 3, 2026
Team W L Pct Div% WC% Playoff% Preseason Playoff% Difference
New York Yankees 89 73 .549 26.3% 43.3% 69.5% 61.5% 8.1%
Milwaukee Brewers 88 74 .543 42.8% 21.3% 64.1% 56.8% 7.3%
Houston Astros 85 77 .525 31.7% 23.0% 54.7% 48.2% 6.5%
Miami Marlins 79 83 .488 8.2% 20.2% 28.3% 22.6% 5.7%
Atlanta Braves 85 77 .525 21.5% 29.6% 51.1% 46.5% 4.6%
Texas Rangers 82 80 .506 18.6% 19.7% 38.3% 34.2% 4.1%
Toronto Blue Jays 90 72 .556 32.5% 41.2% 73.7% 69.9% 3.8%
Cleveland Guardians 79 83 .488 16.7% 11.3% 28.0% 25.2% 2.8%
St. Louis Cardinals 77 85 .475 5.6% 11.1% 16.8% 14.5% 2.2%
Kansas City Royals 82 80 .506 30.3% 14.3% 44.6% 43.4% 1.1%
Los Angeles Dodgers 97 65 .599 76.9% 17.2% 94.1% 93.1% 1.0%
Baltimore Orioles 88 74 .543 22.6% 40.5% 63.1% 63.0% 0.1%
Washington Nationals 64 98 .395 0.1% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 0.0%
Colorado Rockies 60 102 .370 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%
Los Angeles Angels 67 95 .414 0.6% 1.4% 2.0% 2.2% -0.2%
Cincinnati Reds 77 85 .475 5.3% 10.4% 15.7% 16.5% -0.8%
Pittsburgh Pirates 79 83 .488 10.5% 15.5% 26.0% 27.1% -1.1%
Philadelphia Phillies 90 72 .556 40.9% 29.7% 70.6% 71.8% -1.2%
Tampa Bay Rays 73 89 .451 0.8% 8.4% 9.1% 11.0% -1.8%
Chicago Cubs 86 76 .531 35.8% 22.5% 58.2% 60.1% -1.9%
Chicago White Sox 71 91 .438 2.2% 2.2% 4.3% 6.6% -2.3%
Minnesota Twins 76 86 .469 9.7% 8.4% 18.0% 20.7% -2.7%
Seattle Mariners 88 74 .543 45.9% 21.3% 67.2% 70.1% -2.9%
Arizona Diamondbacks 81 81 .500 6.5% 27.0% 33.5% 36.7% -3.2%
San Francisco Giants 83 79 .512 9.6% 32.4% 42.0% 45.5% -3.5%
New York Mets 88 74 .543 29.3% 32.9% 62.2% 65.7% -3.5%
Detroit Tigers 84 78 .519 41.3% 13.1% 54.4% 58.1% -3.7%
Athletics 72 90 .444 3.1% 6.1% 9.2% 13.3% -4.1%
San Diego Padres 82 80 .506 7.1% 29.3% 36.4% 41.9% -5.5%
Boston Red Sox 88 74 .543 17.9% 46.0% 63.9% 72.7% -8.9%

To put this into context, just after last year’s trade deadline, only four teams saw their ZiPS playoff probabilities move at least five percentage points. The number was eight teams in 2024, three in 2023, and six in 2022. In other words, a week of games is about as impactful as a trade deadline.

Expectations for teams, by and large, haven’t changed. Not a single team saw its rest-of-season roster strength change by more than .007 of winning percentage, or 1.1 wins per 162-game season. It’s just what is baked into the cake. Those wins and losses have already been accumulated, and even a being of divine providence would have trouble changing them at this point.

ZiPS has been running standings projections since 2005, so I have a couple decades of data to pull from. To get a more empirical, less projection-y look at how easy it is to lose a playoff spot in April, I took all 83 teams with a median outcome of 90 or more wins going into the season. I didn’t include 2020, for obvious reasons. Just to head off one particular vein of argument, yes, 83 teams is a good number fewer than the 161 teams that actually won at least 90 games during the seasons in question. But that’s as it should be. We don’t expect all 30 teams to hit exactly their 50th-percentile median projections in a given season, but for three teams on average to hit their 90th-percentile projection, six to hit their 80th, and so on. If your median projections don’t have less variance than the actual results, you’ve likely done something terribly wrong with your model!

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Anyway, I took the 90-win projected teams and looked at their worst performances in April. A full 26 of those teams finished the month with a losing record. And for most of those teams, it wasn’t just getting one of their fated bad runs over and done with early, an idea I usually deride as “Baseball Calvinism.” From a preseason average projected win total of 92.5 wins, they had an average finish of 85.2 wins, with slightly less than a third of them (8 of 26) finishing with at least 90 wins.

Worst April Performance, ZiPS-Projected 90-Win Teams
Year Team Preseason Win Proj. April Winning Pct Final Wins
2008 New York Yankees 95 .483 89
2013 Washington Nationals 94 .481 86
2010 Boston Red Sox 93 .478 89
2012 Philadelphia Phillies 90 .478 81
2009 Chicago Cubs 95 .476 83
2021 New York Mets 91 .476 77
2008 Detroit Tigers 91 .464 74
2021 New York Yankees 95 .462 92
2021 Atlanta Braves 91 .462 88
2022 Atlanta Braves 90 .455 101
2015 Washington Nationals 91 .435 83
2019 Boston Red Sox 94 .433 84
2019 Washington Nationals 93 .429 93
2018 Los Angeles Dodgers 95 .429 92
2009 New York Mets 91 .429 70
2011 Boston Red Sox 93 .423 90
2005 New York Yankees 91 .417 95
2005 Philadelphia Phillies 98 .417 88
2007 New York Yankees 95 .391 94
2009 Tampa Bay Rays 90 .391 84
2006 Minnesota Twins 90 .375 96
2021 Minnesota Twins 91 .375 73
2013 Toronto Blue Jays 94 .370 74
2012 Los Angeles Angels 90 .348 89
2013 Los Angeles Angels 93 .346 78
2023 St. Louis Cardinals 91 .345 71

Three of the 26 teams did manage to come back and beat their preseason win projection. Props to the 2006 Twins, who got off to a 9-15 start but still beat their preseason projection by nine wins.

What would the cost be of a bad April this year? To simulate bad Aprils, I ran the rest of this season 30 more times, each time making the team in question win four fewer games for the rest of April than projected, distributing the extra wins randomly in each simulation to the teams that it plays over the next four weeks. I then compared the change in each team’s playoff percentage, both to today’s projection and to its preseason playoff percentage. I’m also going to assume that the underperforming teams don’t actually see their team strength get any worse over those four weeks in order to isolate just how big a deal actual results are, with no change in expectation.

ZiPS Playoff Projections – Bad Aprils
Team 4/3 Playoff% Preseason Playoff% Bad April Playoff% Diff from 4/3 Diff from Preseason
Milwaukee Brewers 64.1% 56.8% 39.4% -24.7% -17.4%
Houston Astros 54.7% 48.2% 32.2% -22.5% -16.0%
New York Yankees 69.5% 61.5% 47.6% -21.9% -13.9%
Atlanta Braves 51.1% 46.5% 30.9% -20.2% -15.6%
Texas Rangers 38.3% 34.2% 18.8% -19.5% -15.4%
Miami Marlins 28.3% 22.6% 10.0% -18.3% -12.6%
Kansas City Royals 44.6% 43.4% 27.8% -16.8% -15.6%
Chicago Cubs 58.2% 60.1% 41.9% -16.3% -18.2%
Toronto Blue Jays 73.7% 69.9% 57.4% -16.3% -12.5%
Cleveland Guardians 28.0% 25.2% 12.3% -15.7% -12.9%
San Francisco Giants 42.0% 45.5% 27.6% -14.4% -17.9%
Baltimore Orioles 63.1% 63.0% 49.0% -14.1% -14.0%
Pittsburgh Pirates 26.0% 27.1% 12.0% -14.0% -15.1%
Arizona Diamondbacks 33.5% 36.7% 19.6% -13.9% -17.1%
San Diego Padres 36.4% 41.9% 23.7% -12.7% -18.2%
Philadelphia Phillies 70.6% 71.8% 58.1% -12.5% -13.7%
Seattle Mariners 67.2% 70.1% 54.7% -12.5% -15.4%
St. Louis Cardinals 16.8% 14.5% 4.5% -12.3% -10.0%
New York Mets 62.2% 65.7% 50.1% -12.1% -15.6%
Detroit Tigers 54.4% 58.1% 42.6% -11.8% -15.5%
Cincinnati Reds 15.7% 16.5% 5.4% -10.3% -11.1%
Minnesota Twins 18.0% 20.7% 8.6% -9.4% -12.1%
Los Angeles Dodgers 94.1% 93.1% 86.2% -7.9% -6.9%
Boston Red Sox 63.9% 72.7% 57.4% -6.5% -15.3%
Tampa Bay Rays 9.1% 11.0% 3.3% -5.8% -7.7%
Athletics 9.2% 13.3% 4.2% -5.0% -9.1%
Chicago White Sox 4.3% 6.6% 1.4% -2.9% -5.2%
Los Angeles Angels 2.0% 2.2% 0.2% -1.8% -2.0%
Washington Nationals 1.0% 1.0% 0.1% -0.9% -0.9%
Colorado Rockies 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% -0.1%

With a bad April, every team in baseball except for the Dodgers becomes just about a coin flip or worse to make the playoffs. For teams like the Yankees and Cubs, both considered likely to make the playoffs coming into the season, it’s a serious drop-off, but relatively a flesh wound, as they have plenty of “outs” remaining to draw. For teams like the Cardinals, Reds, or Twins, a bad April is essentially an evisceration, with a strong majority of their playoff scenarios disappearing into thin air.

What does this all mean? If you’re a playoff contender, and you underperform in April, you should consider your record very seriously, even if your opinion of your team’s quality is completely unchanged. That means that adding wins is necessary now; don’t take a wait-and-see-where-we-stand-two-weeks-before-the-deadline approach. It can be hard to add wins this early in the season, but teams with bad starts really should be considering trying to catch lightning in a bottle with their minor leaguers — not just with their top prospects, but also the guys who are tearing it up in Triple-A. And if the opportunity to make a big trade does arise, struggling teams should take it. April really is the cruelest month.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cave Dameron
21 minutes ago

You know what can’t be lost in April? Dan and his coolness. Thank you!