ZiPS Time Warp: Albert Pujols
As you read this, Albert Pujols is still trying to hit his 660th home run, tying him for fifth all-time with Willie Mays. This round-tripper will very likely be 40-year-old Albert’s last big career milestone. He could still catch Alex Rodriguez, next in the home run gauntlet at 696, or even get the roughly 200 RBIs needed to catch Hank Aaron’s all-time record, but at his age and advanced state of decline, these will likely need a minimum of two more full-time seasons. So why does a player like this find his way into a ZiPS Time Warp? The cruelty of time ensures that most Hall of Famers surpass milestones when they’re well into their declining years, but in the case of Albert Pujols, we have that rare all-time great who was a shadow of himself for half of his career.
The greatness of 2000s Pujols hardly needs to be restated, so we won’t dwell on it too long. Through the first decade of his career, he hit .331/.426/.624 with 408 home runs, 1230 RBIs, and a sterling 70.6 WAR. Through age 30, that comes out to sixth all-time in homers, eighth in RBIs, and eighth in WAR (Mike Trout has pushed him back to ninth in the last number). The first time he ended a season as a major leaguer and didn’t tally an MVP vote was in 2013, the 13th season of his career. That’s short of the 15-year streak of Barry Bonds, but he didn’t get his first MVP tally until age 25.
Unlike many of these all-time greats, Albert emerged in the majors fully formed with little need for adjustment. As impressive as a .329/.403/.610, 37 HR, 7.2 WAR debut was for a 21-year-old, it’s stunning how he managed having only played three games above A-ball. Even Trout, our gold standard for phenomitude, only hit .220/.281/.390 in his first 40-game cameo; after his 40th game in the majors, Pujols had a 1.150 OPS. It was this quick burst into the majors at such a young age, along with his steep decline, that fueled the rampant speculation that Pujols, originally born in the Dominican Republic before later moving to New York and then Missouri, was a few years older than his birth certificate claimed. While the actual truth of this story remains a mystery, no evidence has ever been presented that is robust enough for me to dignify with even a hyperlink.
The Cardinals knew early on what they had in Pujols and they made sure to not let him get to free agency quickly, avoiding arbitration after his third season in the majors by signing him to a seven-year, $100 million extension with a $16 million team option for an eighth season. That turned out be a windfall from the team’s point of view, with Pujols earning that money in performance terms long before the contract expired.
Pujols landed the monster deal upon hitting free agency, signing with the Los Angeles Angels for 10 years and $240 million after the 2011 season. There was a bit of a warning sign in 2011 when Pujols slumped to a .299/.366/.541, 37-homer line, something that most players would be happy to call a career year but a significant step down from his first decade in the majors. Like most, I thought the back half of the contract would be a poor one, at least from the point of view of the Angels given that the deal started in his age-32 season, a red flag for any free agent. What I wasn’t prepared for — and I think few were — was the magnitude and velocity of the decline. Pujols wasn’t a plodding one-dimensional slugger; he was a complete hitter, one who comfortably hit for extremely high batting averages and rarely struck out, at least by modern standards. I certainly didn’t expect him to age like Adam Dunn or Ryan Howard or Mo Vaughn. The last is especially stinging because the 1.9 WAR that Vaughn put up in each of his seasons in Anaheim bested Pujols’ results in all but two of his years with the Angels.
In terms of steepness, Pujols has suffered one of the worst declines of any Hall of Fame hitter — we can safely assume that he is going to Cooperstown unless he turns out to be the inventor of steroids by use of a time machine — which has made his race through the milestones have the character more of a weary trudge than a last hurrah. His 6.2 WAR from age-32 on is in the bottom-tier of Hall of Fame hitters, and it’s even worse than it looks with half the players below him not even getting 1,000 plate appearances. His even steeper dropoff from age 35 on highlights the dreariness of his later career.
| Name | G | PA | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Klein | 196 | 525 | -1.6 |
| Jim Bottomley | 312 | 1146 | -1.2 |
| Larry Doby | 39 | 124 | -1.0 |
| Willie Keeler | 316 | 1288 | -0.8 |
| King Kelly | 20 | 73 | -0.5 |
| Roberto Alomar | 196 | 788 | -0.4 |
| Lloyd Waner | 235 | 592 | -0.4 |
| George Kelly | 64 | 226 | -0.3 |
| Bill Mazeroski | 34 | 72 | -0.3 |
| Albert Pujols | 731 | 3093 | -0.2 |
| Joe Tinker | 7 | 12 | -0.1 |
| Ray Schalk | 7 | 3 | 0.0 |
| Jim Rice | 191 | 770 | 0.0 |
| Hughie Jennings | 4 | 9 | 0.0 |
Thirteen Hall of Fame hitters played replacement-level ball or worse starting at age 35. Pujols stands out for the amount of ineffective baseball we’ve seen from him, with the rest of the players on the list retiring either voluntarily or non-voluntarily when it was clear they could no longer contribute in the majors. With guaranteed money and no apparent motivation on either side for a buyout that would lead to a graceful retirement, this has led to an unfortunate secondary result in which we’ve seen Pujols at his worst longer than any other great hitter.
Rather than imagining a Hall of Famer who spent the last decade of his career as a Quadruple-A slugger, let’s take the ZiPS Time Machine back to a happier period, when Albert was Albert. Let’s go back to just after the 2010 season, his last great year. He hit .324/.414/.596, led the league in home runs, RBIs (weirdly the only time he did this), and until hitting .293 in September, had a realistic shot at the Triple Crown before Miguel Cabrera got his. Sure, any projection from this point will feature a lot of decline, but hopefully a gentler one that would see Pujols hit some of these career milestones at least closer to his customary awesomeness.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | .329 | .403 | .610 | 590 | 112 | 194 | 47 | 4 | 37 | 130 | 69 | 93 | 157 | 7.2 |
| 2002 | .314 | .394 | .561 | 590 | 118 | 185 | 40 | 2 | 34 | 127 | 72 | 69 | 151 | 5.4 |
| 2003 | .359 | .439 | .667 | 591 | 137 | 212 | 51 | 1 | 43 | 124 | 79 | 65 | 187 | 9.5 |
| 2004 | .331 | .415 | .657 | 592 | 133 | 196 | 51 | 2 | 46 | 123 | 84 | 52 | 173 | 7.8 |
| 2005 | .330 | .430 | .609 | 591 | 129 | 195 | 38 | 2 | 41 | 117 | 97 | 65 | 168 | 7.7 |
| 2006 | .331 | .431 | .671 | 535 | 119 | 177 | 33 | 1 | 49 | 137 | 92 | 50 | 178 | 8.1 |
| 2007 | .327 | .429 | .568 | 565 | 99 | 185 | 38 | 1 | 32 | 103 | 99 | 58 | 157 | 7.7 |
| 2008 | .357 | .462 | .653 | 524 | 100 | 187 | 44 | 0 | 37 | 116 | 104 | 54 | 192 | 8.7 |
| 2009 | .327 | .443 | .658 | 568 | 124 | 186 | 45 | 1 | 47 | 135 | 115 | 64 | 189 | 8.4 |
| 2010 | .312 | .414 | .596 | 587 | 115 | 183 | 39 | 1 | 42 | 118 | 103 | 76 | 173 | 6.8 |
| 2011 | .306 | .415 | .584 | 563 | 108 | 172 | 32 | 1 | 41 | 122 | 104 | 72 | 180 | 8.1 |
| 2012 | .299 | .397 | .572 | 558 | 113 | 167 | 33 | 1 | 39 | 128 | 89 | 78 | 172 | 7.9 |
| 2013 | .301 | .400 | .559 | 551 | 104 | 166 | 32 | 1 | 36 | 118 | 89 | 74 | 169 | 7.2 |
| 2014 | .294 | .388 | .516 | 541 | 102 | 159 | 31 | 1 | 29 | 115 | 82 | 74 | 159 | 6.8 |
| 2015 | .287 | .385 | .535 | 533 | 90 | 153 | 28 | 1 | 34 | 100 | 83 | 75 | 157 | 6.6 |
| 2016 | .285 | .379 | .539 | 527 | 92 | 150 | 27 | 1 | 35 | 102 | 79 | 73 | 151 | 5.7 |
| 2017 | .282 | .370 | .541 | 521 | 88 | 147 | 25 | 1 | 36 | 98 | 72 | 68 | 144 | 4.7 |
| 2018 | .260 | .351 | .482 | 515 | 80 | 134 | 22 | 1 | 30 | 89 | 70 | 64 | 129 | 3.9 |
| 2019 | .262 | .346 | .484 | 512 | 81 | 134 | 22 | 1 | 30 | 88 | 64 | 63 | 119 | 2.9 |
| 2020 | .248 | .323 | .423 | 508 | 69 | 126 | 18 | 1 | 23 | 75 | 54 | 54 | 101 | 1.5 |
| 2021 | .240 | .308 | .389 | 504 | 62 | 121 | 16 | 1 | 19 | 67 | 47 | 49 | 88 | 0.3 |
| 2022 | .233 | .294 | .359 | 460 | 53 | 107 | 13 | 0 | 15 | 55 | 38 | 42 | 77 | -0.6 |
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | OPS+ | WAR |
| ZiPS RoC | .276 | .366 | .502 | 6293 | 1042 | 1736 | 299 | 11 | 367 | 1157 | 871 | 786 | 140 | 55.0 |
| Actual | .262 | .318 | .459 | 5051 | 652 | 1324 | 241 | 1 | 251 | 861 | 413 | 652 | 114 | 10.3 |
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | OPS+ | WAR |
| ZiPS Career | .302 | .395 | .560 | 12026 | 2228 | 3636 | 725 | 26 | 775 | 2387 | 1785 | 1432 | 155 | 132.3 |
| Actual | .299 | .378 | .547 | 10784 | 1838 | 3224 | 667 | 16 | 659 | 2091 | 1327 | 1298 | 146 | 87.6 |
With a projection-point of 2010 and knowledge of the home run boost in recent years, ZiPS now has Pujols finishing his career with 775 home runs, enough to make him the all-time leader over Barry Bonds. ZiPS has an algorithm projecting whether a veteran retires based on performance, milestones, and contract, and would normally have projected him to retire after 2021, but with 760 homers through that season, it figured he’d come back to at least get the final three. The projected Pujols also grabbed the all-time RBI title from Aaron, and while the batting average was still expected to steadily decline in his 30s, he stayed just above the .300 barrier. Also, 132.3 career WAR is enough to rank seventh among hitters, giving a potent case for the honor of being the best first baseman in major league history.
Unfortunately, history did not let us have this version of Albert Pujols. He will still go to Cooperstown as one of the best players of this generation and hopefully, by the time he steps up to the podium on a muggy July day, the memories of him at his pitcher-terrorizing best will have replaced the more recent images of his struggles as an Angel.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Pujols really did look like he could be the next Hank Aaron. In fact, the ZiPS projection would have him beat Aaron’s all-time record for total bases with 6,738, in addition to the all-time HR mark.
Here’s hoping a current teammate of Albert’s can make a run for 763…
I’ve been thinking about this, and I just don’t see it. He’s at about 300 now, and he’d have to hit 39 home runs a year for the next 12 years to do it. It seems unlikely. But he seems like he’d be a better bet than most other players, since it’s hard to find players that debut early enough and hit 40 home runs a year consistently enough to make it.
So Fernando Tatis Jr got started young enough and he seems like he has 40-homer a year power but are we willing to bet he will do that consistently enough or healthy enough? Cody Bellinger too. Gallo seems like a good bet to hit 40 a year but he got started a bit later.
Crazy fun factoid on how hard it would be to even chase the all-time HR mark:
Nelson Cruz has hit 359 home runs from his age-30 season until right now (his age-40 season). Add this to Trout’s current total and Trout would be standing at 659 career homers as a 40-year old.
Which is exactly where Albert Pujols is right now. 🙂
Cruz is a different breed
As long as we are playing what if, why not project out Barry Bonds’ age 43 and 44 seasons where he undoubtedly would have been a productive DH if not for collusion.
Let’s also back him up to before his steroids and project out a traditional career.
I, for one, would like to see both projections…
Good idea honestly. Still would be one of the goat players, but he just took it to a new level.
I know people like to throw the c-word around but I honestly dont think it takes collusion for teams to not want to sign a 43 year old lightning rod embroiled in one of the biggest scandals in sports, who has a very long history of being a difficult player and can only really benefit a few teams.
I mean, if we are accepting that he would mostly be a DH at that point, what is the actual market for him? A handful of AL teams that figure to be contenders?
Concur that it doesn’t take collusion. Without the steroids scandals, he was a horrible clubhouse presence. Add that in and he’s quite likely the biggest one in history.
I can imagine each team’s PR group was just hoping and wishing that they wouldn’t be the ones who’d have to deal with all of that
What’s crazy is according to the projections his 240 million dollar contract would actually be a massive underpay for the value of his services. He’s maybe the biggest reason that if I were running a team I simply would never offer the 10-13 year deals guys like Gerrit Cole, Manny Machado and Bryce Harper got. Albert Pujols was, simply put, a much more valuable player than any of those guys and he wound up becoming a franchise killing weight the Angels can’t rid themselves of.
Now that isn’t to say that Pujols is exactly the same as those other three because he was older than them when he hit free agency by a number of years. Rather, when essentially the most reliable projection system the public has available can miss so wildly on what most everyone assumed was a sure thing, it says to me our ability to predict the value of these contracts is too low to be worth the massive risk profile that giving a player such a large percentage of your payroll entails. I admit though, I would go broke giving Mike Trout the deal he got simply because he’s the GOAT, and if he magically becomes Chris Davis it just is what it is. But he’s basically the only guy.
At the time that is – the contract looked a *lot* worse, ZiPS was seriously alarmed by his 2011 season.
I was not a fan of the signing, but what I did not do at the time was go back and look at the difference between the 2012-2021 projections after the 2011 season. ZiPS was definitely seeing something there beyond aging and I didn’t have an inkling just how deep that drop was.
Would be hard to timewarp him assuming different starting ages?
Not saying he actually is older; just looking for a comparo aging curve.
(It has been shown around here that Young phenoms that explode fully formed don’t follow normal aging curves, so it might be interesting to see a curve fit of his first 15(?) years with a normal curve.
There are other players who dropped really fast once they hit decline, but as pointed out, none were given as much playing time to “showcase” their decline.
Before this, the saddest exit of an all-star I ever saw was Willie Mays trying to play the OF his last season. Until now. The angels shouldn’t have allowed it to get this far.
I have always looked at these things, and while it is not something we can actually compute, I think how old someone looks matters. Yelich for example was in the majors when he looked 12 years old. Soto looks old now. I would bet every dollar I have that Soto is going to age poorly as well, if for no reason besides how old he looks. With that said, I think Soto is probably already the best hitter alive, so if he declines like Pujols but peaks like Bonds I doubt anyone cares much. He is 21 years old, so me saying he will age poorly means 8 years down the line. Age is a variable and it isn’t like someone has solved for age. People age differently. Some people have beards in 6th grade and are done growing (me) and some people can’t grow facial hair till they are 30. Obviously you cannot make projections based off of how old someone looks, but I do think it is a factor. People that look older are probably more mature/older.
On a side note, Pujols probably is older. Octavio Dotel said he was in the same age group (he is 46) and Pujols slipped up and said it was 28 years ago when he was 13 (3 years ago). He met his wife at a bar when he was in high school. Why was he in a bar? That was the strictest time for IDing in this country ever, as well. He somehow magically managed to move to the USA at exactly the right age that he can still play HS baseball and not be forced to get his GED. He put up basically the best numbers for anyone ever in HS, and then again in Juco and still wasn’t drafted till the 402nd pick because scouts didn’t believe his age. Are we to believe that 401 picks passed on far and away the best hitter in the country without some knowledge we aren’t privy to? No chance in hell. Guy had 55 intentional walks his senior year of HS. He only had 32 at bats. 55 intentional walks. Then he hits .465 in college with 22 home runs (wood bat) in 31 games. The Cardinals basically said they knew he was older when choosing not to resign him. They also moved him through the system in less than one year. Why would they do that? I’d put the low end on him being 43, high end on him being 46. Just go back and read quotes about him from high school, how he was “more like a teacher than a student. ” Quotes in his year book with quotations around his age. Best “17 year old” baseball player ever, etc. Cmon.
This is interesting. Being a Dodger fan, I’ve been thinking something similar with Mookie. Not that Mookie looks older than his listed age, I don’t think he does. But that he’s got one of the worst hairlines for a 27 year old that I’ve ever seen. Does balding so early have any correlation to peaking/declining early? I think it’s similiar in concept to the idea of maturing/aging early compared to “average”. I just didn’t know how to even articulate it, and it sounded stupid when I said it out loud. Is it crazy to think that if you pay someone for that long, you don’t want them to look like they’re aging earlier than they should? I don’t know, I’m sure it doesn’t help that the last person to stand out to me for balding so much was Kirk Gibso, who certainly did not age well.
Michael Chiklis, 28.

counterpoint: Lebron was balding at age 12
I came to say…tell that to Lebron lol.
I knew a 22 year old with classic pattern baldness.
Then again, he was awful at sports. 😉
Look no further than his former teammate Dustin Pedroia for bad hairlines on young players. I just found him in a Bleacher Report article on the 20 worst hairlines in sports from 2010, when he was 26.
Hay, I think this is known as the “Greg Oden Principle”.
Just neighing.
I actually refer to it as the Greg Oden principle as well.
So Pujols was 24 and still in high school? That’s just silly. No one has ever produced any documented evidence that Pujols was born before 1980.
I don’t know what stats ZiPS uses for its’ projections but there were warning signs even a couple years prior to the contract. His chase rate had started creeping up as early as 2008 but really spiked in 2010 and again in 2011. It spiked again that 1st season with the Angels and has never gone back down When a guy has to get that bat going a little earlier and starts chasing out of the zone, that is a bad sign.
that seems like short sightedness on your part and you hit the reason on the head, age. The Angels literally (and predictably) bought all of Pujols’ decline years, whereas those other contracts you mentioned are spread out over prime-peak-decline years.
You missed the point of what I was saying. I said that his age did differentiate him from those others guys, but the catch is the projections which foretasted greatness for Pujols for another 8-10 years after the 2010 season already have his age baked into the equation. Therefore, when the error bars of the best projection systems can potentially be so large on a player and the investment so catastrophically terrible, I would use extreme caution when pursuing such players.
I didn’t miss your point at all, I don’t think anyone expected Pujols to decline the way he has but I also don’t know of anyone that though he would be valuable at 40 much less putting up a 1.5 was season at age 40 like the time warp would have you think. My point is simply that comparing Pujols to Machado or Harper is comparing apples to bowling balls.
Having watched most of Albert’s Angel career I can’t say I ever saw the competitive drive that he seemed to have with St. Louis. It didn’t help that he never did seem to come into spring training in good shape.
And not to turn the discussion towards steroids but it’s shocking to me that Nelson Cruz is nearly the same age as Pujols. I’m also reminded of a photo of David Ortiz during his retirement tour standing with Pujols. If I didn’t know any better and you asked me which guy was retiring I would’ve pointed to Pujols without delay.
Is he the same age tho?
I suspect baseball execs know all of this and still do it because they make two assumptions, or perhaps estimates. One is that a marquee signing will keep the fan base interested and coming to the park for at least a few years, which adds revenues that offset some of the expenditures. A second is that they inoculate the contract against the top-end salary inflation rate. So I think they all know that on one level, giving 10 or more years to anyone over 25 virtually guarantees at least a few seriously under-performing years at the end. There are as yet no reliable metrics to predict an individual player’s decline slope; it’s especially difficult at the superstar end because the sample size is by definition small.
I suspect almost all of them would rather sign someone for 6 and $250M than 10 and $325. But “almost all” isn’t enough; it just takes one or two desperate franchises with owners with more money than acumen to create the precedent, and once set it’s difficult to retrench.
All that said, the Pujols deal was quite obviously bad at the time it was made. Who knew better than the Cardinals, who had a major incentive to keep him because of his status with fans and his presence in the community. The Angels were dumb but they were also unlucky. He should have had some big years until at least age 35.
I’d open the vault for Trout too although if the Angels were fully committed to winning they would have dangled him for half a dozen great prospects and a couple of 2 WAR players, for the unfortunate reason that they can’t seem to win with him. Of course that would be the equivalent of trading Gretzky to the Kings, only that was done for purely financial reasons. I wouldn’t expect the Angels’ brass to be that brave. I would not bet against a steep decline for Trout because of his body type. He’s big and will probably get bigger. He doesn’t seem driven like a Michael Jordan, which may make the prospect of keeping in great shape a little less appealing when he’s 33 and the team can’t win 81 games.
Yeah, I think he is 2-3 years older which would explain most everything about his decline. Who knows, maybe not but it’s a more elegant explanation
Would it really? I don’t think it would. Players don’t usually go from 6-8 WAR seasons to mediocre at best in two seasons, no matter their age. There is some evidence of a steeper aging curve as you get into your mid-30s and then late 30s, but it is not a cliff. If Pujols were two years older than he is listed at, you could expect way less than the 55 WAR stated in the article, but still much better than what he did.
So Pujols was 21 years old and still in high school?
Big fan of these retrospectives. They got me thinking about players, specifically pitchers, before the difference between ERA and FIP became more widely understood. When I look at the final seasons of John Smoltz (6.35 ERA versus 3.87 FIP) and Roy Oswalt (8.63 ERA vs 3.08 FIP), I wonder if they didn’t still have some gas left in the tank.
I get that it is widely known, but is it correct?
Reminds me a lot of Griffey Junior, who also found a cliff and dove off, bouncing a few times on the way down. Griffey couldn’t stay in the lineup with his injuries, while Pujols reported feet injuries let him play, but increasingly at a shadow of himself. A shame Pujols never quite figured out how to be merely good, instead of great or mediocre/bad. His dueling match with 100 bbWAR has been entertaining though! Sheesh, that’s a big difference between the two on Pujols. The metrics here hate, hate, hate his defense.
Bbwar also says Minor was the best pitcher in the MLB last year
No it doesn’t. Bwar says his collective contributions as a pitcher were most valuable not that he was the best pitcher, i mean clearly that’s not the case.
One of the great mercies is that Albert Pujols’ contract will finally end soon, he will retire to his nice personal services contract (albeit only after he finds no one is interested in signing him), he can stop being the slowest human in major league baseball and reminding all of the fans how far he has fallen, and we can all stop reading stories about why THIS is the year that Albert Pujols will reclaim the old magic.
I would pay to see Albert and Wilson Ramos leg it around the bases.
This year, Albert Pujols has a Sprint Speed of 21.9 feet per second. The next lowest one (minimum 25 attempts) are Miguel Cabrera and Justin Smoak at an even 23. Wilson Ramos is fifth from the bottom at 23.4.
Guys who were slow before they got old and hurt, man, they’re really slow now. In contrast, the guys who have been DH’ing forever and stayed relatively healthy like Cruz and Encarnacion actually aren’t that bad in terms of running.
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t there a Fangraphs article from a bit ago that showed his aging curve and it matched up with players two or three years older than him (like, his decline at Age 35 was typical for someone at 38, or something)?
I think this is it — https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/39462/rubbing-mud-aging-angel/ — not sure if links to other sites are allowed, but it wasn’t FG.
Dan, would be curious what the ZiPS projections for 2012-> are for Pujols if we consider 2011 and/or that he’s two years older than reported.
Thanks.
That one sort of answers my curiosity: his performance mirrors that of a “normal” all-star two years older. Which is roughly what I saw comparing him to Aaron.
There are other explanations possible–he might have an undisclosed degenerative condition–but this one matches.
There is no reason to believe he is the age he says he is. I’d bet my left nut he is older than his listed age. We need an article about how well he hit in his age 46 year imo
Well, the Angels giving that contract to a 33-34 year old is one reason, no?
They wanted a superstar in tbe worst way and got him.
In the worst way.
The biggest irony is they already had the kind of player they wanted.
Hindsight is 20-20 but if they had realized it, they could have used tbat money synchronize tbeir competitive window with his arrival. Sort of like San Diego and Tatis, Atlanta and Acuña. Forthat matter, Cleveland has done a decent enough job of surrounding Lindor with an adequate supporting cast on a budget.
Here’s Pujols’ fWAR output, by year:
Age 21: 7.2
Age 22: 5.4
Age 23: 9.5
Age 24: 7.8
Age 25: 7.7
Age 26: 8.1
Age 27: 7.7
Age 28: 8.7
Age 29: 8.4
Age 30: 6.8
Age 31: 3.9
Age 32: 3.3
Age 33: 0.5
Age 34: 2.7
Age 35: 1.6
Age 36: 0.8
Age 37: -2
Age 38: -0.2
Age 39: -0.4
Age 40: -0.1
In the article Adam S listed below, Pujols does seem to incriminate himself with the quote of, “Dotel was 2 or three years older than me at the time [of my first home run]”. Dotel is listed at 46 years-old right now. Let’s say Pujols is actually 43 right now. Here’s what his aging curve would look like if he was 24 when he debuted (not 21, as claimed):
Age 24: 7.2
Age 25: 5.4
Age 26: 9.5
Age 27: 7.8
Age 28: 7.7
Age 29: 8.1
Age 30: 7.7
Age 31: 8.7
Age 32: 8.4
Age 33: 6.8
Age 34: 3.9
Age 35: 3.3
Age 36: 0.5
Age 37: 2.7
Age 38: 1.6
Age 39: 0.8
Age 40: -2
Age 41: -0.2
Age 42: -0.4
Age 43: -0.1
Really makes you wonder…
It’s interesting if you go back and read scouting reports on him from when he was drafted. Scouts mention old player skills and didn’t expect him to age well. In fact a lot of the descriptions read like good descriptions of him during his Angels career. I wonder how scouts would’ve evaluated him if they were told he was two years older.
The age thing could really explain a lot of the strange aspects of Albert’s career.
To be fair, he could have just misremembered how old Dotel is. Hell, I’ve forgotten how old I am sometimes and I’m younger than Pujols.
Sure that’s possible but its an odd statement to make just to get wrong, he spoke with such…surety .
What about Edgardo Alfonzo after the 2000 season?
Does Pujols’s steep decline have any implications for projections on Mike Trout?
I hope the next article I read about Pujols is the last.
Angels should let Albert pitch so he can be the first player ever with 600 homeruns, 3,000 hits, and a pitching appearance