Dollar Sign on the Scout
I’m stating nothing new when I say that the popularity of Michael Lewis’s Moneyball did much to introduce its readers to the splendors of quantitative analysis in baseball. Nor is it inaccurate to say that Lewis — whose capacity for narrative is more or less unrivaled — characterized the sport’s older guard of talent evaluators (read: scouts) less as invaluable members of baseball’s front offices and more as mouth-breathing luddites.
For a number of reasons — most of them having to do with common sense — this image of scouts has disappeared almost entirely. Scouts are very clearly essential to the health of a baseball organization, and, generally speaking, it’s those teams that seek to use the best possible information — both visual and quantitative analysis — that experience the most success.
Still, even as the sabermetric community has acknowledged the importance of scouts and the act of scouting, there’s been no attempt (so far as I know) to measure the actual worth of individual scouts to their respective organizations.
This represents an attempt to do just that — to put a dollar sign on the scout, as it were.