2012 Roy Oswalt Projections: The Wizard of DL?

It sounds as if Roy Oswalt should sign sometime this very Thursday. Since you are reading this in the future — which, to you, will feel like the present, but trust me: it’s the future — you may already know of Oswalt’s new team. Don’t gloat.

Instead, let us turn our languid eyes to Oswalt’s future, more specifically, his 2012 projections.

Maybe it is because he has pitched 150 innings in every season since the beginning of the Bush administration — or maybe it is because he played such a prominent role in a successful Houston Astros that seems now so distant from reality — but Roy Oswalt somehow feels ancient. Despite that, he is only a year and change older than Mark Buehrle and a year and one day older than Cliff Lee.

So Oswalt, first of all, is really not old — especially for a pitcher. At the same time, though, he is not necessarily healthy. He hit the DL twice last year and his back problems and his full history of injuries leaves great cause for concern.

Still, the Wizard of Os also ranks among some the best active pitchers. Regard:



With only 69 pitchers over the last 6 years putting up at least 900 innings — or an average of at least 150 innings per year — Oswalt’s 1415 IP appears frankly quite durable and impressive. He had collected 30 starts or more over his last 7 seasons before 2011, and despite his back problems, he still finished the season pretty strong, sporting a 3.44 FIP and 2.5 WAR through just 139 IP.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

If we were to number Oswalt’s areas of concern, I imagine we would start like this:

1) His injury risk. For as much as he has been durable during his career, the seriousness of his recent injuries and his age both make injuries the Big Concern. In 2011, he had the second-lowest IP total of his career, but was still largely effective when he was pitching. At this point, 200+ IP is not impossible, but the winning team would be better off hoping for / paying for 150 to 175 innings, or 24 to 27 starts.

2) His career-worst xFIP. As we can see in the chart above, Oswalt has typically under-played his FIP — and the same is true for his xFIP and SIERA. However, for the first time in his career, his xFIP- stepped across to the bad side of league average (hitting 103 xFIP-). His HR/FB ratio dropped to a career low 6.3% in 2011, well beneath his 8.8% career rate. If all his other peripherals hold constant, but his HR/FB ratio normalizes, that could result in a considerable dulling of his value.

3) His decreasing slider effectiveness. Oswalt has a few mediocre pitches, but three really dominant pitches: His fastball, his sinker, and his slider. Across the charts, his velocities were down in 2011, but the most concerning change was the decreased effectiveness of his slider. It went from ranging between 0.50 and 1.00 wSL/C to hitting -0.25 last season (via Pitch F/x). If Oswalt loses control over his second-best pitch, he might become more suited to relief duty than starting.

Worth noting: Oswalt has a FIP approximately equal to 3.85 when going through a lineup for the third time. In 2011, his FIP was ~4.30 — whether that stems from pitch selection or exhaustion or random fluctuation, I do not know.

Here is what the projection systems — and a 3-year weighted average (5-4-3) — suggest Oswalt is capable of:

The projections, as suggested above, range from about 150 to 175, which means the winning team will need somewhere from 3 to 8 extra starts from a sixth starter. In a hotly contested division with a team lacking pitching depth, that could be a huge hurdle.

On the high end Rotochamps foresees a return to the glory days for Oswalt — 175 IP and 3.35 FIP — while Dave Cameron’s system of choice, ZiPS, predicts another injury-plagued, yet effective season with 153 IP and a 3.49 FIP.

Altogether, with the projections averaging 167 IP, a 3.43 FIP, and a 3.57 ERA, the winner of the Oswalt derby should be getting a February steal, at least 2 to 3 cheap WAR — but only the future (your future, and my present future) will tell. When it becomes the present, that is.





24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PCR
14 years ago

Witty article and quality analysis – thanks Bradley

channelclemente
14 years ago

Fun read. Really liked the ‘ranked bar graph’.

KJ
14 years ago

What do you think the odds are that he will actually sign before the season starts rather than pull a Clemens and just sign and come in later?

atit
14 years ago

why are guys like CC Sabathia and Roy Halladay not on this graph??

Jon
14 years ago
Reply to  atit

good question

halladay is 2nd behind timmy with a 3.06 FIP and 2.85 era throwing 1556 innings

CC is 4th behind carpenter with a 3.25 FIP and 3.22 era throwing 1588 innings

which is almost 50% more than anyone else in the top 5

jim
14 years ago
Reply to  atit

my first thought as well

Blez
14 years ago

And Matt Cain surely?

Nice piece… but this dataset must have different criteria…

Spike
14 years ago

where does the Oswalt soap opera stop?

Still say the Jays are the best baseball fit, of course that assumes he drops the diva act and will go to a team that actually wants him… of course I’m also assuming that the Jays would step up to the plate.

Robbie G.
14 years ago
Reply to  Spike

What is the deal with the Blue Jays’ relatively uneventful offseason?

Spike
14 years ago
Reply to  Robbie G.

no clue, but as long as the Sabre-community keeps applauding AA, I guess it’s copacetic.

Blez
14 years ago

Ah… there a lot more bars than data labels clearly!

And chance we can see the full list?

Cheers

gonfalon
14 years ago
Reply to  Blez

+1

that data would be much better represented as a table

Cory
14 years ago

Great article and graphs.

Nik
14 years ago
Reply to  Cory

except it seems like half of the pitchers are missing in the first one.

John
14 years ago
Reply to  Nik

Dude, that’s a horrible excuse.

jim
14 years ago
Reply to  Nik

almost as bad as “i thought fedex was closed”

Spike
14 years ago

Supposedly the soap opera will continue as Oswalt is expected to announce that he will sit out the beg of the year and be available as a hired gun during the season. Yawn.

geo
14 years ago
Reply to  Spike

Yeah, I’m wondering why the article when he says he’s sitting out until a contender has an injury?

Jon
14 years ago

The graph is a little missleading it makes it look like Roy is the 6th best pitcher whos thrown 900ip since 2005

but hes actually the 11th

Tim Lincecum
Roy Halladay
Chris Carpenter
CC Sabathia
Jake Peavy
Brandon Webb
Zack Greinke
Felix Hernandez
Johan Santana
Cliff Lee
Roy Oswalt

Jon
14 years ago

I understand I just figured you would have used to top 35 guys and not just a random sample of 35 guys