Archive for March, 2016

Maybe Travis Shaw Is Just Better Than Pablo Sandoval

Perhaps you already thought it inevitable, but now it’s official: Out of the gate, Travis Shaw will be starting for the Red Sox at third base, over Pablo Sandoval. Through the end of his contract, Sandoval is owed more than seventy-five million dollars. Shaw, meanwhile, is owed an amount of money you could actually imagine in your own bank account. This is surprising, because of the commitment the Red Sox made to Sandoval the previous offseason. But this is not surprising, because Sandoval was a disaster. Hanley Ramirez might’ve been a more conspicuous disaster, but Sandoval managed to beat him, ever so slightly, in negative WAR.

There are just a few things that have to be said in response to the news. The first, which is critical, is this is non-binding. I mean, Shaw will start on opening day, but beyond that, no one’s really said anything. It stands to reason Sandoval is going to play; he’s not going to be a full-year pinch-hitter. It is legitimately unusual for a team to rule against its own financial commitments, at least this soon. And then — well, this decision was probably easy. This is the right time to give Shaw his chance. He might just be a better baseball player than Sandoval is, and after back-to-back seasons of misery, the Red Sox are in the business of maximizing wins.

Read the rest of this entry »

Blake Rutherford Shows Tools of a Top-Five Draft Pick

I got my first look at Blake Rutherford (Chaminade College Prep, Calif.) at USA Baseball’s Tournament of Stars showcase last summer. The 18-year-old outfielder, whom evaluators considered a top 10-draft prospect entering the spring, reinforced that status at last weekend’s National High School Invitational at the USA Baseball complex in Cary, NC, perhaps elevating himself given the underwhelming performances of some of his similarly talented peers.

The video below merges Rutherford’s batting practice from Tournament of Stars and his four at-bats from the Chaminade Prep vs. Walton HS (Ga.) contest at NHSI.

Read the rest of this entry »

2015 Starting Pitcher Ball-in-Play Retrospective – AL East

Teams are setting their Opening Day rosters, another page is about to flipped on the wall calendar, heralding the dawn of the regular season. Never mind those pesky Opening Day temperature forecasts of sub-40 degrees in my neck of the woods. Today, we’ll open the second half of our ball-in-play-based analysis of 2015 starting pitcher performance. Most recently, we examined the NL West. We begin our look at the junior circuit with the AL East.

First, some ground rules. To come up with an overall player population roughly equal to one starting rotation per team, the minimum number of batted balls allowed with Statcast readings was set at 243. Pitchers are listed with their 2015 division mates; those who were traded during the season will appear in the division in which they compiled the most innings. Pitchers are listed in “tru” ERA order. For those who have not read my previous articles on the topic, “tru” ERA is the ERA pitchers “should” have compiled based on the actual BIP frequency and authority they allowed relative to the league. Here we go:

Starting Pitcher BIP Profiles – AL East
M.Estrada 88.57 91.95 84.82 6.1% 46.2% 15.5% 32.2% 74 18.1% 7.6% 78 110 75
Pineda 88.14 92.07 86.03 2.7% 27.2% 21.9% 48.2% 103 23.4% 3.1% 109 83 79
Archer 90.10 92.00 89.29 2.6% 31.3% 20.0% 46.1% 112 29.0% 7.6% 81 72 81
Warren 88.06 90.97 85.42 3.2% 28.8% 22.8% 45.2% 87 19.5% 7.3% 82 90 82
Gausman 87.43 91.26 85.45 4.5% 33.6% 17.1% 44.7% 97 21.9% 6.2% 106 102 83
E.Ramirez 89.30 92.38 87.25 4.1% 27.7% 20.4% 47.8% 94 18.9% 6.0% 94 94 87
Tanaka 89.86 93.21 87.21 3.2% 30.6% 19.2% 47.0% 111 22.8% 4.4% 88 99 89
W-Y.Chen 87.61 91.74 86.37 5.5% 33.9% 20.1% 40.5% 100 19.3% 5.2% 83 104 89
Karns 89.20 92.03 87.87 3.4% 33.1% 21.6% 41.9% 104 23.4% 9.0% 92 102 92
Odorizzi 88.82 92.35 85.90 4.3% 36.4% 22.0% 37.3% 106 21.4% 6.6% 84 90 92
Sabathia 87.86 90.45 86.08 3.1% 29.3% 21.7% 45.9% 99 18.9% 6.9% 118 117 93
E.Rodriguez 87.58 91.39 85.74 4.8% 28.6% 23.5% 43.0% 98 18.8% 7.1% 96 98 93
Miley 87.52 92.13 84.23 2.1% 28.3% 20.8% 48.8% 96 17.7% 7.7% 111 95 95
U.Jimenez 88.07 91.63 86.54 3.5% 25.3% 22.1% 49.1% 104 21.2% 8.6% 102 100 95
Dickey 88.08 91.72 85.02 5.1% 32.2% 20.8% 41.9% 93 14.3% 6.9% 98 112 97
Porcello 88.99 92.36 86.53 1.7% 30.8% 21.8% 45.7% 118 20.2% 5.2% 123 103 101
Buehrle 87.23 92.50 83.94 2.8% 29.9% 21.4% 45.9% 97 11.0% 4.0% 95 106 102
Eovaldi 88.28 90.86 86.79 1.8% 24.2% 21.8% 52.2% 107 18.0% 7.3% 105 85 103
J.Kelly 90.01 91.89 89.68 1.7% 27.7% 25.1% 45.6% 108 18.8% 8.4% 120 104 103
M.Gonzalez 89.56 92.76 86.50 3.4% 32.4% 23.9% 40.3% 107 17.5% 8.2% 122 125 106
Tillman 90.33 91.92 90.16 4.8% 30.5% 21.2% 43.5% 102 16.2% 8.6% 124 111 106
Hutchison 88.39 92.36 85.36 4.4% 32.0% 24.0% 39.6% 123 19.4% 6.6% 139 110 111
AVERAGE 88.59 91.91 86.46 3.6% 30.9% 21.3% 44.2% 102 19.5% 6.8% 102 101 93

Most of the column headers are self-explanatory, including average BIP speed (overall and by BIP type), BIP type frequency, K and BB rates, and traditional ERA-, FIP-, and “tru” ERA-. Each pitchers’ Adjusted Contact Score (ADJ C) is also listed. Again, for those of you who have not read my articles on the topic, Unadjusted Contact Score is derived by removing Ks and BBs from opposing hitters’ batting lines, assigning run values to all other events, and comparing them to a league average of 100. Adjusted Contact Score applies league-average production to each pitchers’ individual actual BIP type and velocity mix, and compares it to league average of 100.

Read the rest of this entry »

KATOH Projects: St. Louis Cardinals Prospects

Previous editions: ArizonaBaltimore / Boston / Chicago AL / Chicago NL / Cincinnati  / Cleveland / Colorado / Detroit / Houston / Kansas City / Los Angeles (AL) / Los Angeles (NL)Miami / Milwaukee / Minnesota / New York (AL) / New York (NL) / Philadelphia / Pittsburgh / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle.

Earlier today, lead prospect analyst Dan Farnsworth published his excellently in-depth prospect list for the St. Louis Cardinals. In this companion piece, I look at that same St. Louis farm system through the lens of my recently refined KATOH projection system. The Cardinals have the 15th-best farm system in baseball according to KATOH, and rank second best in terms of pitching.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Most Important Players of 2016

Mike Trout is the best player in baseball, and losing Trout would cost the Angels more wins than the loss of any other player would cost any other franchise. But even with Mike Trout, we’re only projecting the Angels for 80 wins this year, and unless some of his teammates step up, the Angels might not be a factor in the postseason race this year. So, while no one is as singularly valuable as Trout is, there are some players whose performances might end up swinging a division race one way or another, especially because we don’t really know what they’re going to be.Today, let’s look at a few players with a wide range of potential outcomes who could play a critical role in determining whether their team ends up in the postseason this year.

Read the rest of this entry »

Eno Sarris Baseball Chat — 3/31/16

Eno Sarris: love this love you be here soon

Alex in Austin: Better season Corbin or Shelby?

Eno Sarris: Corbin for floor.

Bork: #TrollVotto has started early. How excited are you for it during the regular season? Will he bust out the tripod during an actual game?

Eno Sarris: If anyone would ever call his shot, it would be him, and he’d be pointing to left center grass.

James: Jimmy Rollins has looked great so far in spring. Is it that far-fetched to think he could go 20/20 this season? Last season was awful and he still went 12/13.

Read the rest of this entry »

Let’s Find Some MLB Comps for Tyler White

Tyler White has already accomplished a hell of a lot for a baseball player, no less a baseball player who wasn’t drafted until the 33rd round. He earned six minor-league promotions in just three years. He hit .311/.422/.489 across those six stops — a surefire way to quickly climb the organizational ladder. He was invited to the Houston Astros’ big-league camp, where he hit .348/.446/.543, and at the end of it all, he was handed the Opening Day job as the team’s first baseman, and why wouldn’t he?

It was somewhat of a surprise, given White having never played in the majors, and the Astros’ status as a contender, and Jon Singleton having been the favorite throughout the winter, but White outplayed Singleton, and frankly, White’s outplayed Singleton every step of the way.

So a 25-year-old rookie is now the starting first baseman on a team many consider to be the best in the American League, and expectations, naturally, are high. It doesn’t take much more than a quick perusal of #AstrosTwitter to see the hype surrounding White. Many feel he’s the long-term answer at first base for a team who gave 47 starts to Luis Valbuena and Marwin Gonzalez there in the midst of a playoff run last season. Some are calling for Rookie of the Year. Someone I spoke with recently loosely compared him to Paul Goldschmidt, if not only as late-round first basemen who were slept on during their ascent through the minor leagues, despite doing nothing but crushing every level at which they played.

And it’s true — White has been slept on. Even this year, a year after putting up a .467 on-base percentage and 178 wRC+ at Triple-A, he didn’t make a single top-100 prospect list. Not at MLB, not at ESPN, not at Baseball America, not at BaseballProspectus. Our own Dan Farnsworth was higher on White than any other prospect evaluator this offseason, and even Farnsworth’s bullishness pegged White as the sixth-best prospect in the system.

Mostly, it has to do with the position. White came up as a third baseman, but has since been moved to first and may even be better suited as a designated hitter. He offers little in the way of speed, and without any value coming from the field or the bases, the bat’s got to be elite for him to have value as a prospect. His career minor-league wRC+ is 157, which sure hints at an elite bat — for reference, Goldschmidt’s was 163 — but what makes White such a compelling case, beyond the production defying his late-round draft status, is his offensive profile.

See, White’s overall production in the minors has mirrored that of a slugging first baseman, but the way he goes about that production has not. More specifically: for a first baseman, he doesn’t have much in the way of power. Instead, he derives his offensive value from a remarkable ability to control the strike zone; in the minors, he’s walked 174 times and struck out 164 times. Yes, that’s more walks than strikeouts across more than 1,200 plate appearances.

White is intriguing due in part not only to his career trajectory, but also his profile. Both seem nearly unprecedented, and so in cases like these, when we begin treading into unfamiliar territory, it only makes sense to gain context by means of historical perspective.

Read the rest of this entry »

Evaluating the 2016 Prospects: St. Louis Cardinals

Blue Jays
Red Sox
White Sox

The Cardinals certainly have tons of mid-level depth. If history continues to repeat itself, that means at least two above-average position players and a high-upside pitcher or two will pop up from the low minors this year, replenishing the lack of “impact” players at the high levels. They continue to target hitters with upside in the hit-tool department, trusting them to develop power or complement it with defensive or base-running value. On the pitching side, it’s like a broken record for a lot of the newer pitchers in the low levels: (Pitcher Name) came in throwing in the high-80s, and now comfortably sits in the low- to mid-90s with more physical projection left to realize.

No one will be excited by the prospects coming up through this system, but you’d be mistaken if you underestimate the player development model they have created in recent years. I had trouble putting a lot of the prospects I like in this system into the 50+ group for various reasons, but the Cardinals have one of the highest numbers of players just outside that line that could step forward this year with the right adjustments.

There are a number of players whom I rank lower than most in this organization, but in all honesty, there’s so much clustering in the middle of the list that it’s just semantics arguing over most of them. Feel free, anyway. Darren Seferina is my top pick for the Cardinals’ patented out-of-nowhere starting position player, with excellent hitting ability and base-running potential to go with potential above-average defense at second base. If you listen carefully, you’ll hear the boo birds gathering forces in the darkest corners of the internet as you read this.

Read the rest of this entry »

Making Too Much of Too Little Jason Heyward

For an awfully consistent hitter, Jason Heyward is considered an awfully frustrating hitter. Over the last four years, he hasn’t had a wRC+ under 110 or over 121, but there’s so clearly the potential for so much more than that too few people have come away satisfied. And it’s easy to identify the problem: Observers wish that Heyward would hit for more power. He clearly can — the man stands 6’5. He clobbered 27 homers when he was 22. He’s hit 24 homers the last two years combined. It doesn’t matter that Heyward has still been productive; he looks like he should be a beast of a hitter, so it’s odd to see him hit singles and doubles.

Let’s focus on Heyward and power for a minute, then. Forget about everything else. Throw caution to the wind, even. What follows is going to lean upon some spring-training data. One spring of spring-training data. The headline raises the red flag right off the bat — I’m probably making too much of too little. But just looking at how Heyward has hit the ball, there are early signs that he’s concentrating on pop. As can always be said when writing about a small sample: What we have here is something to monitor.

Read the rest of this entry »

Effectively Wild Episode 852: 2016 Season Preview Series: Chicago Cubs

Ben and Sam preview the Cubs’ season with authors Mark Armour and Dan Levitt, and Jeff talks to Mountain Goats frontman/Cubs fan John Darnielle (at 21:40).