2017 Top 100 Prospects

Below is my list of the top-100 prospects in baseball. Each prospect has a brief scouting summary here with links to the full team reports embedded in their names where applicable. Those without links will have them added as I cover the remaining farm systems. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources, as well as from my own observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of my prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.

Note that prospects below are ranked overall and that they also lie within tiers demarcated by their FV grades. I think there’s plenty of room for argument within the tiers, and part of the reason I like FV is because it can illustrate how an on-paper gap that seems large may not actually be. The gap between prospect No. 3 on this list, Amed Rosario, and prospect No. 33, Delvin Perez, is 30 spots but the difference between their talent/risk/proximity profiles is quite large. The gap between Perez and prospect No. 63, Kyle Tucker, is also 30 numerical places but the gap in talent is relatively small. Below the list is a brief rundown of names of 50 FV prospects who didn’t make the 100. This same comparative principle applies to them.   -Eric Longenhagen

70 FV Prospects

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2015 from Cuba
Age 22 Height 6’2 Weight 205 Bat/Throw B/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/60 60/60 40/60 70/70 40/50 70/70

Scouting Summary
The tools are deafening. Moncada is a plus-plus runner with plus-plus arm strength, plus raw power and an advanced idea of the strike zone. He’s going to strike out, and there are some within the industry concerned about how much. That said, I think it’s important to consider that while Moncada was K-ing a lot late last year he was also a 21-year old who had played for just a month and a half above A-ball and, during a large chunk of that time, was learning a new position. The stat-based projection systems, KATOH and otherwise, seem comfortable with it, and so am I. I think he’ll provide rare power and patience while playing a premium position — he’s looked fine at second base in my looks this spring — and, while it might take adjustment at the big-league level, I think he’ll eventually be the best of this crop of minor leaguers.

(Author’s Note: This is the tier in which Shohei Otani would appear, and likely at the very top. I’ve seen him up to 99 and think he has a chance for three plus secondaries and plus command.)

65 FV Prospects

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
2. Andrew Benintendi, OF, Boston Red Sox
Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Arkansas
Age 22 Height 5’10 Weight 170 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
60/70 55/55 45/55 55/55 50/55 50/50

Scouting Summary
Though he’s unlikely to produce home-run totals commensurate with elite corner outfielders, Benintendi is going to be a doubles machine with elite on-base and contact skills. His natural feel for squaring pitches in various parts of the strike zone and generating hard, all-fields contact is sublime, and 40-plus annual doubles is in range. He could play center field, and play it well, if a cataclysmic deluge of injuries tear through Boston’s outfield, but for now he projects as a plus defender in either corner. Even at age 22, Benintendi’s modest stature belies physical projection and the cement on his physical tools is more or less dry, but his polish and proverbial (but also literal) baseball acumen are terrific, and he’s as close to a finished product as any prospect on this list.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Dominican Republic
Age 21 Height 6’2 Weight 170 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/60 50/55 40/50 60/60 55/60 60/60

Scouting Summary
An exceptional athlete who has become more explosive and coordinated as his body has matured, Rosario projects as a plus defender at shortstop. His recent physical maturation has also aided his offensive output, though his raw power (which was on par with all but the game’s best power-hitting prospects at the Futures Game) hasn’t shown up on paper yet. If he starts to get to it in games, and if more raw power comes as Rosario’s frame continues to mature, he’s going to be a monster. I consider him the best bet to top this list next year.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Vanderbilt
Age 23 Height 6’1 Weight 190 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/55 50/50 40/45 60/60 55/60 60/60

Scouting Summary
A polished and underrated defender, Swanson’s contact/power profile is modest in a vacuum but is very favorable at shortstop. His plate discipline vaults his overall value skyward.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2013 from Grayson HS (GA)
Age 22 Height 6’2 Weight 195 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/70 55/60 45/60 60/55 40/50 40/40

Scouting Summary
Meadows’ ability to hit for power without sacrificing his ability to make contact would profile at any position, but his speed and ability to play a viable defensive center field — or to be plus in a corner — make him a potential four-tool star. Pittsburgh’s log jam in the outfield complicates his path to playing time.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Dominican Republlic
Age 22 Height 6’3 Weight 175 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
70/70 45/50 60/60 55/60 40/50

Scouting Summary
Owner of a potentially dominant three-pitch mix headlined by elite starter’s velocity, Reyes’s full-season coming-out party is being delayed by Tommy John. Routine though TJ may be, it still represents risk and missed development time, something with which Reyes is familiar after dealing with shoulder trouble in 2015 and then a marijuana suspension last year. He’s never thrown more than 109 innings in a given year, and the missed reps have cost him curveball and command consistency. When his stuff is on, however, he’s utterly dominant.

60 FV Prospects

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2013 from Venezuela
Age 20 Height 6’1 Weight 175 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/60 55/60 35/55 50/40 40/50 60/60

Scouting Summary
Torres is built like a late-60s Camaro and packs a similar wallop, possessing rare power on contact for a middle infielder. His defensive actions are sexier than they are effective at this point. While I think he’ll eventually be fine at shortstop, scouts are not unanimous in that regard, either because they want to see him tighten up fundamentally or think he’ll lack range at physical maturity. If that happens — or if New York employs a superior defensive shortstop — Torres’s bat still profiles anywhere and he’s a potential star at second or third base, too.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2013 from Dominican Republic
Age 20 Height 6’0 Weight 185 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/70 40/50 30/45 70/60 45/55 70/70

Scouting Summary
One of the few true potential five-tool talents in the minors, Robles has advanced feel for all-fields contact and wreaks havoc on the bases while possessing the speed to play high-end defense in center field. That’s the skill set of a plus regular, and if he ever grows into game power (either with a mechanical adjustment or simply via physical maturity), he’s a potential perennial All-Star.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2013 from Lakewood HS (CA)
Age 22 Height 6’2 Weight 180 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/55 40/45 30/40 50/50 50/60 60/60

Scouting Summary
While Crawford is unlikely to impress with counting stats like homers or stolen bases, his discerning eye for the strike zone, solid contact profile and potential elite defense at shortstop should generate high-end real-world value. Those concerned by his statistical output at Triple-A last year should examine the possibility that Reading’s hitter-friendly haven may have artificially engorged their expectations beyond what’s reasonable. One should also remember that Crawford was just 21. He could be a one- or two-hole hitter and play great defense at a premium position.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2014 from Venezuela
Age 19 Height 6’0 Weight 160 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
60/70 50/70 50/70 40/50

Scouting Summary
Espinoza was the best prospect I saw during instructional league in either Florida or Arizona, sitting 95-97 with movement and flashing two dominant secondary offerings. He’s short but not small, his arm works well, he’s athletic and only turned 19 a few days ago.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2013 from Curacao
Age 20 Height 5’9 Weight 150 Bat/Throw S/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
45/70 40/40 20/30 70/70 50/60 55/55

Scouting Summary
A wholly unique entity and one of minor-league baseball’s most entertaining prospects, Albies epitomizes the concept of “twitch,” and that characteristic pervades his entire style of play. He may lack the in-game pop we’re beginning to see from second basemen in the majors, but his combination of speed and bat-to-ball ability should provide favorable offensive output for second base. He’s a potential plus defender there because he’s taking shortstop range, actions and athleticism with him to the other side of the bag.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2015 from Cuba
Age 21 Height 6’3 Weight 175 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
60/70 50/60 40/50 40/60 40/55

Scouting Summary
I’ve never seen someone generate elite velocity with as much ease and grace as Alvarez, who was untouchable in the AZL last year despite tinkering with his secondaries. He began to harness fastball command in Low-A after his promotion. The premium velocity is complemented by a hard-biting slider that flashes plus. Alvarez’s smooth delivery and athleticism dictate heavy projection on the command and changeup.

Drafted: 4th Round, 2013 from Hamilton HS (AZ)
Age 21 Height 6’4 Weight 213 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/45 60/70 40/60 45/40 60/70 60/60

Scouting Summary
Bellinger’s swing is so explosive and cacophonous that it looks like he’s going to corkscrew himself into Earth’s upper crust as he finishes it. Some worry he might strike out an awful lot in the majors, more than is acceptable for a first baseman. But he’s never had issues with huge K totals in the minors, has good ball/strike recognition, and when he does make contact, he hits bombs. He’s also a 70 defender at first base, capable of playing either outfield corner if he needs to, and I’ve spoken with scouts who think he could pass in center field.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Lake Mary HS (FL)
Age 20 Height 6’0 Weight 180 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/55 55/60 40/55 50/45 40/50 60/60

Scouting Summary
Note how the tool grades compare to those of Gleyber Torrres. Rodgers has a bit less bat control, isn’t quite as flashy a defender and is barbecuing in the low minors for a bit longer, but the physical traits to hit, hit for power and play a viable shortstop are all there. And Rodgers’ track record of hitting at or above his age level dates back to 2013, so I think the profile is relatively stable compared to other position prospects in the lower minors.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2013 from Dominican Republic
Age 20 Height 6’4 Weight 205 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/50 70/80 50/70 45/40 45/50 50/50

Scouting Summary
Jimenez’s body has matured more quickly than I anticipated when I saw him make his stateside debut in the AZL. He’s got 70 raw power right now, flicking lasers over the left-field wall with ease during BP and stumbling into wall-scraping homers he barely squares up in games. I think he’s going to have elite power in his mid-20s and there’s solid feel for contact here, too.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2012 from Coral Springs HS (FL)
Age 23 Height 6’3 Weight 170 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 60/60 50/60 60/60 50/55 60/60

Scouting Summary
Always a volatile prospect because of his penchant for strikeouts and trips to the disabled list, Brinson has made adjustments to his swing as he’s moved up the ladder, a testament to his athleticism and ability to manifest his coaches’ wishes on the field. He has big raw power (into which he’s tapping more readily in games) and speed, and a chance for some 20/20 seasons while playing good defense in center field.

17. Willy Adames, SS, Tampa Bay Rays
Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Dominican Republic
Age 21 Height 0’0 Weight 0 Bat/Throw /
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/55 55/60 40/55 45/40 40/45 60/60

Scouting Summary
The barrel-chested Adames might ordinarily project to move off of shortstop given his build, but it seems to me that Tampa has a rather liberal organizational philosophy about what constitutes a viable defensive shortstop and Adames isn’t going to be any less competent there than aging Asdrubal Cabrera and Yunel Escobar have been in recent years. If Adames does have to move off of shortstop (I have a future 50 on him there), then he’s probably grown into enough power to profile anywhere he moves. He has good feel for contact and a bat path that should produce power and contact. If his body matures in the Goldilocks Zone and, when he’s 25, he’s added power but simultaneously retained the physical agility to stay at shortstop, he’ll be among the growing collection of young Uber Shortstops we all get to watch for the next decade.

18. Francis Martes, RHP, Houston Astros
Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Dominican Republic
Age 21 Height 6’0 Weight 170 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 60/70 45/55 40/55

Scouting Summary
I watched Martes’s fastball get spanked during the Fall League, but it’s clear he’s a special talent with sneaky athleticism for a pitcher with his build. He was 94-98 for me in the AFL, a 70 fastball on pure velo but docked a grade due to a lack of movement. He varies the shape of his power curveball depending on situation/location. Once his command of it is fully realized (something I’m betting on because, again, we’re talking about a good athlete), I think it’s going to be a dominant, plus-plus pitch. The changeup flashes and once Martes’ fastball command improves a bit, I think the changeup will follow shortly after it, as he’ll find himself in changeup-friendly counts more often and should be able to develop that pitch. He conservatively projects as a No. 3 starter, the type of arm most teams run out on Opening Day. If that fastball starts moving, though, and plays at its velo, he could be more than that.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2012 from Harvard Westlake (CA)
Age 22 Height 6’6 Weight 255 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 30/40 60/70 45/50 40/50

Scouting Summary
Giolito’s 2016 was disappointing, but there are several potential explanations for it, ranging from purported mechanical changes to hellish travel (Double-A to MLB to Low-A to Triple-A to MLB, back to Triple-A, back to MLB, back to Triple-A, back to MLB… I think that’s it) to just the simple fact that this is a giant 21-year-old with big stuff that he hasn’t yet harnessed. At his best, Giolito sits mid-90s with a big curveball and improving changeup, which I saw him use quite deftly this spring (though he was just 90-93 that day).

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Louisville
Age 22 Height 5’11 Weight 185 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/60 55/60 30/55 70/70 40/50 40/40

Scouting Summary
Ray is a physical speedster with great bat speed and is far toolsier than your typical college-draftee outfielder. He’s a bit raw in center field and may have to move to left, but should carry the offensive weight required to play there should the move occur — especially if he can adjust his approach to hit for more power than he did in college, as I have him projected to do.

55 FV Prospects

Drafted: 1st Round, 2014 from Mt Pleasant HS (TX)
Age 21 Height 6’3 Weight 195 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
70/70 50/60 45/60 30/45

Scouting Summary
It comes at the expense of effort and violence, but Kopech has one of the planet’s hardest fastballs and flashes a dastardly slider. He also projects for an impact changeup based on his elite arm speed. Some think his command issues will force a move to the bullpen, where he’d be dominant; others see a unique specimen who can handle abnormal physical stress for 100-plus pitches every fifth day and think he’ll at least be an inefficient mid-rotation starter.

22. Rafael Devers, 3B, Boston Red Sox
Signed: July 2nd Period, 2013 from Dominican Republic
Age 20 Height 6’0 Weight 195 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/55 60/70 40/55 40/30 40/50 60/60

Scouting Summary
Devers’ swing mandates that he catch balls out in front of the plate in order to lift them in the air and utilize his considerable raw power, but his hand-eye coordination and bat speed are so good that, even when he’s making sub-optimal contact, it’s hard and to all fields. He’s more agile than he appears over at third and has a decent chance to stay there for a while, but he’s a potential plus-hit, plus-power prospect. That profile holds water at first base, too.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2011 from Dominican Republic
Age 22 Height 5’11 Weight 180 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 50/55 30/40 70/70 55/60 60/60

Scouting Summary
A plus-plus runner who can go get it in center field, Margot has solid contact skills, as well, and could probably hit for more game power if an adjustment were made to his swing. Doing so proactively seems unwise, however, when he’s already a high-probability above-average regular.

24. Vlad, Jr. Guerrero, 3B, Toronto Blue Jays
Signed: July 2nd Period, 2015 from Dominican Republic
Age 18 Height 6’1 Weight 200 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/60 60/70 40/60 40/30 40/45 60/60

Scouting Summary
I’ve spoken with several sources (both with Toronto and without) who think Guerrero will be in the big leagues before he turns 21. He has elite bat speed and power potential with surprising bat control for such a high-effort swing. His approach at the plate is, predictably, epicurean. But embedded deep within his genealogy is an ability to make this approach viable, and when Guerrero is poking at balls just a few inches above the dirt, his strength/bat speed is so good that the ball still jumps off his bat and into the gaps. At this age with this build, he’s likely ticketed for first base or an outfield corner in the future, but nobody seems to care.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Stanford
Age 22 Height 6’3 Weight 195 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
55/60 45/50 55/70 45/55

Scouting Summary
If not for an elbow injury and subsequent surgery that robbed him of his entire junior year, Quantrill could have gone 1-1 in last year’s draft. His fastball sits in the low- to mid-90s, his changeup is already plus. It will be key for Quantrill to find breaking-ball consistency but it need only progress to average for him to be a good No. 3 starter.

Drafted: 5th Round, 2011 from Hart HS (CA)
Age 23 Height 6’7 Weight 195 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 55/60 40/45 40/45

Scouting Summary
While I’ve been apprehensive about Glasnow’s ability to remain a starter, it’s clearly correct to continue developing him as if it were a foregone conclusion. He has a few late-bloomer traits. He’s an ectomorphic 6-foot-8 with a mid-90s fastball, and it’s perfectly reasonable that he still has trouble throwing strikes. He also has great curveball feel. Huge, athletic, hard-throwing righties with good breaking balls are universally loved by scouts, no matter their control, but Glasnow has been that, and only that, for nearly half a decade now. He remains one of the higher-upside arms in the minors but needs to find a better changeup and command in the next year or two before he’s relegated to the bullpen. If he does he’s a front-end arm.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from La Costa Canyon HS (CA)
Age 19 Height 6’2 Weight 185 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/70 40/50 20/40 60/55 40/55 50/55

Scouting Summary
Scouts see Moniak’s slight frame and wonder if he’ll ever grow into more than 40 game power, but if he hits as well as he’s expected to, it isn’t going to matter. Moniak’s swing is loose and effortless, his feel for moving the bat head around the zone is advanced. He’s a potential plus-plus hitter who runs well enough to play center field, and his instincts for the position make him a potential above-average defender there.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Dominican Republic
Age 23 Height 6’0 Weight 185 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
70/70 55/60 40/50 45/50

Scouting Summary
Lopez’s elite arm acceleration produces a plus-plus fastball and plus breaking ball. He’s athletic and has shown improved pitchability this spring. Some scouts think he ends up in the bullpen due to size/command. I think the changeup and command will grow enough that he’ll be an above-average big-league starter.

29. Jason Groome, LHP, Boston Red Sox
Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Barnegat HS (NJ)
Age 18 Height 6’5 Weight 200 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
55/60 55/70 40/50 40/55

Scouting Summary
Some teams removed Groome from their 2016 draft board because of off-field issues. Just on talent he was arguably the best prospect in the 2016 draft. He’s a big, athletic lefty with a low to mid-90s fastball, plus a curveball and projectable changeup and command. Boston will have to surround him with the proper infrastructure for him to succeed, but he has top-of-the-rotation potential.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Tennessee
Age 22 Height 6’1 Weight 205 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 55/60 40/55 55/50 40/50 55/55

Scouting Summary
Senzel entered his junior spring as a dark-horse candidate to go 1-1 if he could show more consistent defense at third and/or prototypical corner-infield power. The former came and he went No. 2. He was arguably the draft’s most advanced bat and is the odds-on favorite to be the first hitter from the class to debut in the majors. Though Senzel doesn’t have the lofty ceiling typically associated with a draft’s No. 2 pick, he’s very likely to hit for high average, yank out 18-plus homers annually and even provide some value on the bases, as he runs well enough that some amateur scouts were intrigued by the idea of trying him at second base.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from St. Thomas Aquinas HS (KS)
Age 19 Height 6’4 Weight 195 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
70/70 50/70 40/55 30/50

Scouting Summary
The violence in Pint’s delivery and the control issues it propagates had some scouts worried, pre-draft, that he might end up a reliever. He’s an exceptional athlete (also an excellent high-school basketball player) with terrific makeup and, ho hum, was touching 100 during instructional league and flashing a 70 breaking ball. There’s some changeup feel, too. Pint has issues holding his velocity deep into games and with throwing strikes, but if both are remedied he’s a front-end arm.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2009 from Colombia
Age 24 Height 6’2 Weight 185 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 70/70 40/50 50/50 50/55 70/70

Scouting Summary
Arguably the most physically gifted catching prospect of this century, Alfaro has plus-plus raw power, elite arm strength and rare straight-line speed for a catcher. His issues with strikeouts and inconsistent defensive fundamentals had long hindered his on-field output, but the latter issue has largely been solved. He’s likely an above-average everyday catcher despite a K-filled future with low OBPs.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Int’l Baseball (PR)
Age 18 Height 6’3 Weight 170 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/55 40/50 20/40 70/70 45/60 60/60

Scouting Summary
A positive PED test tanked Perez’s draft stock just ahead of selection day, and he fell to the back of the first round, but all the physical characteristics of stardom are here. Perez easily runs and throws well enough for shortstop and has very promising defensive footwork and athleticism. He also has plus bat speed, though his feel to hit is raw.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2013 from Loganville HS (GA)
Age 22 Height 5’11 Weight 185 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 60/60 50/60 50/50 45/50 60/60

Scouting Summary
Elite bat speed has long been the calling card for Frazier, who has hit and hit for power all the way up the minor-league ladder and whose batted-ball profile should play favorably in Yankee Stadium.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2014 from Venezuela
Age 19 Height 6’0 Weight 180 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/60 55/60 30/55 60/55 45/55 55/55

Scouting Summary
Acuna has the straight-line speed to stick in center field for a while and should eventually have the hit/power combination worthy of a corner spot should he one day need to move. He was the best outfield prospect I saw during my Florida tour last fall. (I didn’t see Robles.)

36. Brent Honeywell, RHP, Tampa Bay Rays
Drafted: 2nd Round, 2014 from Walters St CC
Age 22 Height 6’2 Weight 180 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Splitter Cutter Command
60/60 40/40 55/60 60/60 40/45 45/55

Scouting Summary
Honeywell’s deep, unique collection of pitches is bolstered by artistic sequencing, and he essentially never has to pitch off of his fastball (though he could if he wanted to, I’ve seen it up to 98) because he always has new looks to show hitters. The best of these is a cutter and changeup. The screwball is more than a gimmick and can miss bats. Like chocolate cake, though, its best in moderation — not only because it arguably adds to the violence inherent in Honeywell’s delivery (the only thing keeping him from the 60 FV tier) but because it seemed to me that good Fall League hitters were able to recognize it after seeing it multiple times in the same at-bat.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Dominican Republic
Age 21 Height 5’10 Weight 175 Bat/Throw S/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/70 50/55 30/45 50/40 40/50 70/70

Scouting Summary
Though his approach is aggressive and can result in some ugly swings, Mejia is as twitchy a catching prospect I’ve ever seen, with terrific bat speed, bat control and explosive lower-half usage from both sides of the plate. Defensively he’s unkempt with manic, overactive movements behind the plate and stabby receiving, but that should be ironed out with reps, and I’m not moving a 70 arm out from behind the plate unless I really need to.

38. Kyle Lewis, OF, Seattle Mariners
Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Mercer
Age 21 Height 6’4 Weight 205 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/45 60/70 40/60 45/40 45/55 60/60

Scouting Summary
Lewis tore his ACL late last year and, if he weren’t already likely to move to right field, he is now. The good news is he has more than enough power to profile there — and potentially hit in the middle of a good lineup, provided he makes enough contact to get to the power. Scouts and analysts alike were mixed about his ability to do this pre-draft, the former citing the excessive mechanical noise in Lewis’s hands and struggles versus well-located breaking balls, the latter skeptical of his college numbers due to weak competition. Those willing to bet on the bat speed (including myself) think he’ll be fine.

Drafted: 13th Round, 2011 from Westchester HS (CA)
Age 23 Height 6’4 Weight 205 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
70/70 55/55 50/50 40/45 50/55

Scouting Summary
One of 2016’s more prominent pop-up prospects, Gsellman had long been a fastball/fastball-command pitcher with little else to offer. Then he caught Sliders Disease, which seems to be an epidemic among upper-level Mets arms. Now, Gsellman has the wine of an above-average slider to pair with humming mid-90s cheddar. That slider has also made his decent curveball a more interesting and effective change-of-pace pitch. I think he’s a low-risk, mid-rotation starter.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Chaminade Prep (CA)
Age 20 Height 6’3 Weight 195 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/60 55/60 40/55 50/45 40/50 45/45

Scouting Summary
Rutherford’s fall on draft day was not due to talent but due to the gravitational pull of signability issues created by pool-rich teams picking in the 30s and 40s. Though old for his high-school class, Rutherford has always hit against his elite peers and often with power. He’s not a center fielder for me, but rather an advanced prep bat with enough offensive prowess to profile in left field and hit in the middle of the order.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from San Clemente HS (CA)
Age 19 Height 6’1 Weight 175 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
50/55 55/60 40/55 45/60

Scouting Summary
I thought Allard merited consideration near the top of the 2015 draft before a stress reaction in his back ended his senior year. He was nails on the summer-showcase circuit, flashing mid-90s velocity, a plus curveball and some changeup feel, all wrapped in an athletic, repeatable delivery. He has, more or less, tracked as exactly that guy, making 11 starts in full -ason ball at age 18 last year and largely having success.

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2014 from Sahuaro HS (AZ)
Age 21 Height 6’0 Weight 200 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/60 50/60 40/50 50/40 40/50 60/60

Scouting Summary
Verdugo’s body has rapidly matured since draft day but nobody denies his ability to hit, which he has done all the way into the upper minors after just one full pro season out of high school. It’s a corner-only body now and scouts are mixed about how much power Verdugo’s going to have in games, as his approach to hitting doesn’t prioritize it. In aggregate, he should be fine.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from UCLA
Age 23 Height 6’4 Weight 200 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 55/60 45/50 55/60 45/50

Scouting Summary
He looked terrific in the Fall League after missing much of the year due to injury, sitting 93-plus with his fastball during most of his starts in Arizona while showing a unique and effective repertoire of secondaries led by a plus slider.

44. Jose DeLeon, RHP, Tampa Bay Rays
Drafted: 24th Round, 2013 from Southern
Age 24 Height 6’2 Weight 190 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
55/55 50/50 55/60 50/60

Scouting Summary
Yet another fastball/changeup/command arm in Tampa, DeLeon’s ceiling is capped by a lack of an impact breaking ball and potentially by a fastball some view as flat and relatively easy to hit in the air. Unless the issue becomes Miltonesque, he’ll be a fine mid-rotation starter.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2014 from San Francisco
Age 24 Height 6’5 Weight 205 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 55/60 40/50 60/55 45/55 60/60

Scouting Summary
Zimmer gallivants from gap to gap using long, efficient strides and is a good defensive fit in center field. He has rare power for the position, the booming thwack of his contact only rivaled in the AFL by Eloy Jimenez and Franklin Barreto. The strikeout issues are real, mostly due to swing length, and it wouldn’t surprise me if Zimmer had career-long issues with contact, at least against lefties. But I’ll live with it if it means getting the glove and pop into the lineup every day.

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2014 from Xavier HS (IA)
Age 21 Height 6’3 Weight 195 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 55/60 45/50 50/60

Scouting Summary
Keller throws hard, has an impact curveball and throws a high volume of strikes. There’s some disagreement about his changeup projection, something he may not end up needing very much if his curveball command keeps improving. There are concerns about his injury history, which largely kept him off the field until last year. If he’s healthy for another year and the cambio starts improving, he’ll rocket up this list.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2014 from East Carolina
Age 24 Height 6’5 Weight 225 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
55/60 45/55 55/60 45/50 40/45

Scouting Summary
Early results in MLB have been discouraging for Hoffman, who was babying his curveball into the zone when I saw him late last year. But his the breaking-ball combo and velocity (he has been up to 98 this spring) are vicious when they’re on, and I’m cautiously optimistic that Hoffman eventually finds his way toward the top of Colorado’s rotation, probably by riding his slider as his put-away pitch rather than the curveball. I see the latter as more of a nasty way for him to get ahead in counts the second and third time through the order.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2016 from Venezuela
Age 17 Height 6’2 Weight 190 Bat/Throw S/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/60 55/60 20/55 50/40 40/55 60/60

Scouting Summary
Though Maitan is likely to move to third base as his body matures (a process that appeared to have begun already when I saw him in the fall), he might hit for average and power from both sides of the plate. He’s the youngest player on this list, having just turned 17 a few weeks ago.

49. Leodys Taveras, CF, Texas Rangers
Signed: July 2nd Period, 2015 from Dominican Republic
Age 18 Height 6’1 Weight 170 Bat/Throw S/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/60 40/50 20/45 60/60 45/60 60/60

Scouting Summary
His right-handed swing needs significant polish but, from the left side, Taveras has the most advanced bat I’ve seen from a prospect in the AZL in the (admittedly brief) period of time I’ve lived in Arizona. He’s a plus runner with great instincts in center field and has a chance to produce impact value with his bat and glove, all while playing in the middle of the diamond.

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2011 from Jesuit HS (TX)
Age 24 Height 6’2 Weight 235 Bat/Throw B/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
55/60 55/55 50/55 40/30 30/40 55/55

Scouting Summary
Bell’s well-rounded combination of on-base ability, bat-to-ball skills and in-game power is strong enough to profile at any position, including first base. He’s a bad defender and hasn’t made the strides many hoped he would during the year and a half he’s taken reps there. Purely on offensive value, he projects as an above-average regular. If he ever becomes a competent defender at first or somehow moves back to the outfield, he’ll be more than that. I’m not sure either of those is going to happen.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Cincinnati
Age 22 Height 6’0 Weight 205 Bat/Throw S/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/55 55/55 40/50 55/55 40/45 55/55

Scouting Summary
There’s some dissent among scouts about Happ’s ability to play second base, but modern infield positioning should help allow for it. Though he sometimes fails to get the bat head out into the zone in time to pull the ball with authority, Happ has enough bat speed to do damage the other way. A .270 hitter with 18-plus homers profiles just about anywhere, and that’s where I believe Happ is headed.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2011 from Venezuela
Age 22 Height 6’1 Weight 184 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
55/60 55/60 40/50 50/60

Scouting Summary
Marquez made his major-league debut last year at age 21, the age of many college draftees. His delivery is relatively effortless, producing a running mid-90s fastball and plus-flashing two-plane curveball. The delivery is indicative of future changeup and command projection.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2013 from Dominican Republlic
Age 21 Height 6’4 Weight 170 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
70/70 50/60 45/60 30/45

Scouting Summary
Lanky and projectable, Alcantara has a chance for three plus pitches but carries significant reliever risk because his present command is quite raw.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Shenendowa HS (NY)
Age 19 Height 6’3 Weight 170 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
55/60 50/60 40/50 35/50

Scouting Summary
The platonic ideal of a power prep righty, Anderson has a tailing mid-90s fastball, precocious curveball feel and enough athleticism to generate optimism about his chances of developing good control. He’s also a relatively fresh, northeastern arm who never needed a changeup in high school but showed some feel for it during showcases.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Royal Palm Beach HS (FL)
Age 19 Height 6’5 Weight 165 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
55/60 55/60 45/60 45/60

Scouting Summary
Scouts are unsure about McKenzie’s physical projection because a lot of them have never seen a pitcher quite this skinny. I’m in, though, and it’s encouraging that McKenzie has been able to hold his velocity deep into games and throughout a 15-start season at his size. He has mature curveball feel and strike-throwing ability, and the natural deception in his delivery allows for some extra changeup projection.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Sheldon HS (CA)
Age 19 Height 6’6 Weight 185 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
60/70 50/60 40/50 30/50

Scouting Summary
A big, hard-throwing righty with a potential plus curveball, Manning’s command projection exists in abstraction, as does that of his changeup. But Manning, who was committed to Loyola Marymount to play baseball and basketball, is exactly the type of athlete who merits an optimistic forecast for both.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2014 from Sanger HS (TX)
Age 21 Height 6’3 Weight 230 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 60/60 45/50 50/55 45/55

Scouting Summary
At age 21, Ortiz’s four-pitch mix is quite advanced. While he lacks the physical projection of the pitching prospects surrounding him on this list, he’s a solid bet to become a mid-rotation starter, provided he can stay healthy and keep his body in check.

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2014 from Springfield HS (MA)
Age 21 Height 5’10 Weight 185 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/40 60/60 30/60 50/50 40/50 55/55

Scouting Summary
An overwhelming majority of second-base prospects are of the hit-before-power variety, while Diaz is the polar opposite. Despite his strikeout issues, he’s likely to get to his power in games because of his uppercut swing. His ball/strike recognition has been good throughout his career, so there’s some on-base ability here as well. Jonathan Schoop was a 2.5 WAR player last year hitting for power without patience. Diaz should be able to do both.

Drafted: 19th Round, 2012 from Old Mill HS (MD)
Age 23 Height 6’3 Weight 160 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
60/60 55/60 50/60 40/45

Scouting Summary
I give Hader a good shot to start because he’s shown glimpses of the command that will be necessary for him to do so and has had success up through Triple-A as a starter. His slider’s effectiveness waxes and wanes, as he sometimes fails to get on top of the ball and drive it down, something that happens more frequently when he tries to locate it to his arm side. But his funky arm slot gives him significant margin for error against left-handed hitters, and I think he’ll develop a changeup that will allow him to deal with righties.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Florence HS (AL)
Age 19 Height 6’3 Weight 190 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
50/50 55/60 40/55 45/60

Scouting Summary
Garrett sits in the low 90s with an above average curveball and mature command for a high-school arm. The changeup should come, and potentially very quickly. If it does, I think Garrett will be the fastest moving prep arm from the 2016 draft. He lacks the physical projection many of the other teenage pitchers on this list possess, but many of the ingredients necessary for success are already in place.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2013 from Fresno St
Age 25 Height 6’7 Weight 255 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 70/70 55/70 50/45 50/55 60/60

Scouting Summary
Judge has shown an ability to make adjustments and deal with his lever length multiple times at various levels of baseball. He’ll probably be playing chess with opposing pitchers throughout his career. He has tremendous power, most of which should translate to games, and enough athleticism and arm strength to be a defensive asset in right field, as well.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2012 from Harvard Westlake (CA)
Age 23 Height 6’4 Weight 170 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 60/60 50/55 45/50

Scouting Summary
Fried’s early pro career was slowed by Tommy John, but if you buy that his late-season performance in 2016 is indicative of the pitcher he’s going to be moving forward, then he’s probably too low on this list. He was mid- to upper 90s and flashing a 70 curveball late in the year, with a changeup that was plus on movement but easy to ID out of his hand.

63. Kyle Tucker, OF, Houston Astros
Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Plant HS (FL)
Age 20 Height 6’4 Weight 190 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/70 45/55 30/50 45/40 40/50 55/55

Scouting Summary
One of the sweetest swings in prospectdom belongs to Tucker, who is likely to grow into more game power as his frame fills out with age. How much he adds will dictate what kind of offensive force he’s going to be. It should play nicely in right field, where he’s likely to end up as the physical maturation begins.

64. Yohander Mendez, LHP, Texas Rangers
Signed: July 2nd Period, 2011 from Venezuela
Age 22 Height 6’5 Weight 200 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
55/60 45/50 50/50 55/60 45/55

Scouting Summary
Athletic and loose, Mendez’s mid-90s fastball and complementary plus changeup are an excellent foundation on which to build. If either breaking ball takes a step forward (the slider is most likely at this point), he’ll be a good mid-rotation arm. Some scouts are concerned about how often he works up in the zone with his fastball, and there are durability questions to answer here, as well.

Drafted: 22nd Round, 2011 from Henderson Int’l (NV)
Age 25 Height 6’5 Weight 210 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
55/60 45/50 40/45 45/55 45/60

Scouting Summary
While Garrett lacks monster stuff, he’s on the precipice of the big leagues and has been remarkably healthy throughout his career. His arm has very few miles on it, as Garrett, a former college basketball player, only began pitching full time in 2014. That, along with his athleticism, affords him late-blooming pitch quality and command projection.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2014 from Olympia HS (FL)
Age 21 Height 6’2 Weight 175 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/55 40/45 20/40 50/50 40/50 55/55

Scouting Summary
Gordon’s actions at shortstop were not as polished in the Fall League as I’d hoped to see, but he clearly has the physical ability to play a solid shortstop while being competent, but not impactfiul, with the bat.

67. Franklin Barreto, SS, Oakland Athletics
Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Venezuela
Age 21 Height 5’9 Weight 174 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 55/55 40/45 60/60 40/45 60/60

Scouting Summary
Barreto has the straight-line speed and arm strength to play anywhere on the diamond, but his actions on the infield are poor and I have him speculatively projected to center field. His bat will play there comfortably, as his plus bat speed produces lots of hard contact. He could run into 12-15 homers, too.

68. A.J. Puk, LHP, Oakland Athletics
Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Florida
Age 22 Height 6’7 Weight 230 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 60/60 40/45 40/45 40/50

Scouting Summary
Puk has a potentially dominant two-pitch combination, but much of his profile is very much in flux for a college arm. Scouts questioned his delivery and physical conditioning at Florida, where he had some back issues. His changeup and command are both raw, although he’s also adding a curveball this year. If it’s effective and Puk is able to command it, he may never need the change. He showed up in good shape this spring and has been able to get out over his front side more regularly, which should help him keep his fastball down this year.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2013 from Hernando HS (FL)
Age 22 Height 5’11 Weight 185 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/70 40/40 30/40 40/40 45/50 60/60

Scouting Summary
Arroyo’s numbers at Double-A last year were mediocre, but he was just 21 and playing half of his games in an extreme pitcher-friendly park at Richmond, where his OPS was more than .200 lower than it was on the road. I still believe in his bat and future defense at third enough to consider him a potential above-average, everyday player who is relatively close to the majors.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Brazil
Age 20 Height 0’0 Weight 0 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
60/60 55/60 40/45 45/55

Scouting Summary
Jettisoned from Seattle as part of their winter purge of players with off-field issues, Gohara is one of the more talented left-handed pitching prospects in baseball, with a mid- to upper-90s fastball and late-breaking plus slider. He’s also flashed command of the fastball, especially to his glove side, and keeps his slider down consistently. He’ll be, at worst, an inning-eating ground-ball machine if he can keep his body in check.

71. Jharel Cotton, RHP, Oakland Athletics
Drafted: 20th Round, 2012 from East Carolina
Age 25 Height 5’11 Weight 195 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Cutter Command
55/55 50/50 70/70 55/55 45/50

Scouting Summary
Cotton is athletic, throws hard, has a plus-plus changeup and above-average cutter. He has had rashes of command issues in the past, and his full-body delivery makes it unlikely that Cotton will ever have surgical command, but Oakland’s staff seemed to remedy his strike-throwing issues after his acquisition from Los Angeles last year.

Drafted: 21st Round, 2012 from Neosho CC (KS)
Age 25 Height 6’4 Weight 180 Bat/Throw R/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 60/70 45/50 50/60

Scouting Summary
I’m on Strahm as a starter not just because I think his changeup will progress to average as he continues to make up for lost development time due to injury, but also because he has excellent command of a vicious curveball that he regularly works inside to right-handed hitters. He’ll also run his fastball up to 96.

50 FV Prospects

Drafted: 1st Round, 2013 from J Serra (CA)
Age 22 Height 6’0 Weight 185 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 55/55 40/50 20/20 50/60 55/55

Scouting Summary
While he’s not likely to produce the lofty home-run totals frequently associated with first base, Smith’s ability to reach base, hit for average and collect a high volume of doubles should still be viable there. Though his lateral range is limited, Smith’s soft hands and strong arm should help make him a defensive asset at first, as well.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Vanderbilt
Age 22 Height 6’2 Weight 175 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Cutter Command
60/60 55/60 40/50 50/60 40/50

Scouting Summary
If Buehler can sustain what we saw in limited looks last summer (upper 90s, touching 100, plus curveball, plus slider/cutter), he’ll be one of baseball’s best pitching prospects by midseason. He was coming off of Tommy John last year and only deployed in abbreviated outings, so we have no idea if he can do this over the course of an entire season or even if he can maintain that sort of stuff deep into starts.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2013 from Miss St.
Age 25 Height 6’1 Weight 220 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 70/70 45/60 50/40 50/50 60/60

Scouting Summary
I, too, am concerned about Renfroe’s combination of natural swing and miss and aggressive approach at the plate, but I think he gets to enough of his huge raw power that he’ll be an average everyday player at maturity. He could make an impact in cavernous Petco with his arm, as well.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2016 from Cuba
Age 18 Height 5’11 Weight 165 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
60/60 50/55 50/60 40/55

Scouting Summary
Morejon was up to 96 last fall during instructional league and not only showing an impact slider but mature usage of it, too. He lacks much physical projection but already throws hard and could move quickly.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Boston College
Age 21 Height 6’2 Weight 170 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
55/55 55/60 45/45 40/50 40/50

Scouting Summary
Dunn’s move from Boston College’s bullpen and into their rotation allowed him not only to show scouts that he could maintain his stuff deep into games, but it allowed him shine light on a four-pitch mix that was hidden underneath a bushel in his closer role. He’s athletic and has a strong lower half, but some are concerned about his size.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2015 from Dominican Republic
Age 18 Height 6’3 Weight 185 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/50 50/60 30/50 45/40 45/60 60/70

Scouting Summary
Tatis looked good during extended spring training (before he was traded) and then continued to improve throughout the summer, showing impressive infield actions, arm strength and burgeoning raw power. He’s likely to move off of short and over to third, but he could be a black hole there while hitting a bunch of homers.

79. Anthony Alford, OF, Toronto Blue Jays
Drafted: 3rd Round, 2012 from Petal HS (MS)
Age 22 Height 6’1 Weight 215 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/40 60/60 40/50 70/70 45/55 40/40

Scouting Summary
Alford has plus raw power, is a plus-plus runner and still has lots of baseball skill projection remaining because he spent 2012-2014 playing college football. He dealt with injuries in 2016, which limited his reps, but Alford looked fine in the AFL. I think the game power will start to show up, though I anticipate strikeouts to remain an issue. If Alford can continue to walk the way he has early in his pro career, the offensive profile will be fine for center field.

Drafted: 11th Round, 2014 from Mississippi St.
Age 24 Height 6’2 Weight 225 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
60/60 55/55 45/50 50/50

Scouting Summary
Woodruff broke out in 2016 by throwing his heavy sinker for strikes with consistency and locating his above-average slider to his glove side. He’s a physically mature 24-year-old and there likely isn’t much more coming in the way of stuff, but there’s already a solid fourth-starter profile here.

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2012 from Westview HS (OR)
Age 22 Height 6’2 Weight 200 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 50/50 35/40 20/20 55/60 60/60

Scouting Summary
A rock-solid defensive catcher with limited but inoffensive offensive ability, Kelly is a low-risk everyday catcher, one of few in the minors. If there’s more to the bat (which I suppose is possible since he’s spent the last several years focusing on his defensive conversion), it’s likely in what is already a favorable contact profile rather than what I think will be limited game power.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2015 from Venezuela
Age 18 Height 5’11 Weight 161 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/60 40/50 20/45 55/50 45/55 60/60

Scouting Summary
Advanced in all facets, Gimenez spent 2016 dominating the DSL. None of his tools have especially remarkable projection, but you could say the same for many of the shortstops at or near the top of this list who are simply much closer to actualizing their ceilings than Gimenez is. There’s a chance for a plus bat and enough range and athleticism to stay at short, but there’s extreme risk here because of Gimenez’s proximity to the majors.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Arizona
Age 23 Height 6’1 Weight 180 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 40/40 30/40 60/60 45/50 55/55

Scouting Summary
Varied opinions about Newman’s overall projection surround his defense. If a given scout thinks Newman fits defensively at shortstop, then it’s difficult to deny the likelihood that he becomes at least an average everyday player. If the scout finds Newman’s defense there to be subpar and prefers him at either second or third base, then suddenly the offensive bar Newman needs to clear to profile as an everyday player becomes ambitiously high. I think he’s fine at short and will hit.

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2016 from Menlo
Age 22 Height 6’3 Weight 200 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/55 55/60 30/50 50/40 45/60 70/70

Scouting Summary
A first-round talent who fell due to off-field concerns, Erceg has terrific feel to hit and future plus raw power coupled with good defensive actions and a cannon arm. His approach to hitting is more double-oriented than it is geared for home runs at present.

85. Chance Sisco, C, Baltimore Orioles
Drafted: 2nd Round, 2013 from Santiago HS (CA)
Age 22 Height 6’2 Weight 193 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/55 50/50 40/45 30/30 45/50 40/40

Scouting Summary
Sisco passes behind the plate despite fringe arm strength because he’s made himself into a solid receiver and game-caller. He tracks pitches like a hawk and has a quiet, comfortable swing and good bat control. There’s some room on the frame for more power as he enters his mid-20s, but it may rob him of his mobility behind the plate.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Vanderbilt
Age 24 Height 6’4 Weight 200 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Cutter Command
55/60 50/50 50/55 50/50 40/45

Scouting Summary
Beede’s coffer of four average-or-better pitches, led by a resurgent fastball, should allow him to attain mid-rotation starter status even if he doesn’t improve upon his fringey command.

Drafted: 18th Round, 2013 from West Laurens HS (GA)
Age 22 Height 6’0 Weight 185 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 50/50 35/40 60/60 50/55 45/45

Scouting Summary
Fowler runs well enough to play a good defensive center field and has the bat speed and hand-eye to generate a lot of strong contact. Despite an aggressive approach that limits his ability to reach base a bit, I think he’s a likely average everyday player.

Drafted: 10th Round, 2012 from San Jacinto
Age 23 Height 6’3 Weight 175 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command
55/55 55/55 45/50 40/50

Scouting Summary
Banda has been up to 96 this spring and has two viable offspeed weapons in his curveball and changeup. The changeup’s projection receives mixed reviews depending on the scout with whom you talk. Some (who are smitten with Banda’s arm speed) think it might one day miss bats, while others (who don’t like the length of his arm action) do not.

Drafted: 4th Round, 2015 from Yavapai JC (AZ)
Age 22 Height 5’9 Weight 177 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/55 60/60 40/50 30/30 40/45 45/45

Scouting Summary
A man without a position, Calhoun’s blend of hit and power is still enough for him to profile as a DH but obviously his overall value takes a significant hit because hitting is all he can do. The Dodgers are hoping he’s passable at second base, but I can’t find a scout who thinks he will be. Those who saw him play all over the place as an amateur don’t think it works in the outfield, either.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2010 from Dominican Republic
Age 23 Height 6’2 Weight 160 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 45/50 30/40 60/60 40/50 55/55

Scouting Summary
Scouts are enamored with but conflicted by Tapia’s eccentric mannerisms, which are highly entertaining to watch but not necessarily effective — and arguably detrimental to what is otherwise an excellent feel for contact. I think he’s going to hit and provide value on the bases.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2011 from Dominican Republic
Age 22 Height 6’0 Weight 188 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/50 45/50 30/40 80/80 40/50 55/55

Scouting Summary
Though somewhat polarizing, Mateo is undeniably gifted. He’s an 80 runner with the physical tools to stick at shortstop, and he has more power than has shown up in games because his strideless approach to hitting doesn’t allow for it. If he stays at shortstop or moves to center field, the bat will play. At second base, I’m not so sure.

92. Jahmai Jones, CF, Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
Drafted: 2nd Round, 2015 from Wesleyan School (GA)
Age 19 Height 5’11 Weight 210 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/60 40/50 30/45 60/60 45/55 45/45

Scouting Summary
Jones is short back to the baseball and rockets head-hunting contact back up the middle at opposing pitchers. He’s a plus runner and great athlete with high-end makeup who should stay in center field and hustle his way to 20 annual doubles while hitting .280 or so.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Bishop Carroll HS (Calgary, AB)
Age 19 Height 6’4 Weight 195 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
55/55 50/55 40/45 40/55

Scouting Summary
Though he doesn’t project to miss as many bats as most of the other arms on this list, Soroka is a big-bodied sinker/slider horse with high-end makeup and advanced pitchability for a Canadian prep product with just one full pros season under his belt.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2016 from Miami
Age 22 Height 6’3 Weight 220 Bat/Throw L/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 60/60 40/60 30/20 40/45 50/50

Scouting Summary
I’m not sold Collins sticks behind the plate. If he does, though, this ranking will be too low. He has big raw power and grandfatherly patience but also some swing-and-miss issues that might undo his profile if forced to move to first base or DH. I’m betting the power and OBP will still be enough for everyday duty if he does have to move and, should a transition occur, it would probably get Collins to the big leagues more quickly.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2015 from Dominican Republic
Age 18 Height 6’1 Weight 185 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/55 55/60 40/55 45/40 40/50 50/50

Scouting Summary
Plate discipline is difficult to scout in Latin America, where showcase environments and workouts are far more common than game reps. It turns out Soto has an advanced idea at the plate and enough raw power to make opposing pitchers pay when they make a mistake. He’s on the low end of the defensive spectrum as a likely right fielder, but there’s enough bat here to make that work.

96. Sean Reid-Foley, RHP, Toronto Blue Jays
Drafted: 2nd Round, 2014 from Sandalwood HS (FL)
Age 21 Height 6’3 Weight 215 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command
60/60 50/50 50/55 40/45 45/50

Scouting Summary
Foley has improved his arm action to the point where scouts who had seem him earlier and considered him a reliever are more receptive to the idea of him starting. It appears as though his command improvements are more than a small-sample mirage. He mixes in two solid breaking balls that play up due to his consistent ability to locate them down and to his arm side. The changeup needs to develop. With a new and improved arm action, it’s more likely to.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2014 from Tullahoma HS (TN)
Age 21 Height 5’10 Weight 196 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command
55/55 50/55 45/50 40/50

Scouting Summary
Sheffield’s command backed up on him last year as he began working with a slider instead of a curveball during games. The slide piece is promising but raw, which can pretty much be said for his entire repertoire including a low-90s fastball that needs to be kept down in the zone to be effective.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Vanderbilt
Age 23 Height 6’0 Weight 195 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Cutter Command
55/60 50/55 55/60 50/55 35/45

Scouting Summary
We’re now almost two years removed from Carson Fulmer’s junior year at Vanderbilt — when he was one of the more polarizing draft prospects of the decade — and nothing has been solved. His velo backed up a bit in 2016, sitting more around 93 than up at 96, but he began working with a promising cutter, and his curveball and changeup were still effective. Unless we see a grade’s worth of progression on the control, Fulmer likely winds up in the bullpen where he’d likely be dominant.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Concordia Lutheran (TX)
Age 20 Height 6’1 Weight 210 Bat/Throw R/R
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/55 45/50 30/45 50/40 45/60 60/60

Scouting Summary
Terrific defense and feel for contact lead the way for Hayes, who’s unlikely to ever develop impact game power.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2012 from Olympia HS (FL)
Age 23 Height 6’3 Weight 200 Bat/Throw L/L
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
55/70 40/40 30/40 40/30 40/45 45/45

Scouting Summary
A future plus-plus hitter, Winker has always lacked the power typical of big league left fielders, but the issue was especially alarming in 2016, likely because of a nagging wrist issue. He lacks an impact tool aside from the bat but I think he’ll hit enough to play every day, even in left field.

Other Prospects in Consideration

RHPs
Jacob Nix, RHP, San Diego Padres
Zack Burdi, RHP, Chicago White Sox
Oscar de la Cruz, RHP, Chicago Cubs
Marcos Diplan, RHP, Milwaukee Brewers
Luke Weaver, RHP, St. Louis Cardinals
Jack Flaherty, RHP, St. Louis Cardinals
Dakota Hudson, RHP, St. Louis Cardinals
Erick Fedde, RHP, Washington Nationals
Forrest Whitley, RHP, Houston Astros
David Paulino, RHP, Houston Astros
Franklin Perez, RHP, Houston Astros (Perez was my last cut among pitchers)
Ariel Jurado, RHP, Texas Rangers
Grant Holmes, RHP, Oakland Athletics

LHPs
Kyle Freeland, LHP, Colorado Rockies
Stephen Gonsalves, LHP, Minnesota Twins
Tyler Jay, LHP, Minnesota Twins
Joey Wentz, LHP, Atlanta Braves
Sean Newcomb, LHP, Atlanta Braves
Cole Ragans, LHP, Texas Rangers

INF
Hunter Dozier, 3B, Kansas City Royals
Shed Long, 2B, Cincinnati Reds
Jeimer Candelario, 3B, Chicago Cubs
Matt Chapman, 3B, Oakland Athletics

OF
Bryan Reynolds, OF, San Francisco Giants
Greg Allen, OF, Cleveland Indians
Alex Kirilloff, OF, Minnesota Twins
Christin Stewart, OF, Detroit Tigers
Aristides Aquino, OF, Cincinnati Reds
Christian Pache, OF, Atlanta Braves (Pache was my last cut among bats)
Tyler O’Neill, OF, Seattle Mariners
Ramon Laureano, OF, Houston Astros
Jesus Sanchez, OF, Tampa Bay Rays

The Full Top 100

2017 Top 100 Prospects
Rank Name Team Position Age FV
1 Yoan Moncada CWS INF 21 70
2 Andrew Benintendi BOS OF 22 65
3 Amed Rosario NYM SS 21 65
4 Dansby Swanson ATL SS 23 65
5 Austin Meadows PIT OF 21 65
6 Alex Reyes StL RHP 22 65
7 Gleyber Torres NYY SS 20 60
8 Victor Robles WAS CF 19 60
9 J.P. Crawford PHI SS 22 60
10 Anderson Espinoza SD RHP 18 60
11 Ozzie Albies ATL 2B 20 60
12 Yadier Alvarez LA RHP 20 60
13 Cody Bellinger LA 1B 21 60
14 Brendan Rodgers COL SS 20 60
15 Eloy Jimenez CHC OF 20 60
16 Lewis Brinson MIL CF 22 60
17 Willy Adames TB SS 21 60
18 Francis Martes HOU RHP 21 60
19 Lucas Giolito CWS RHP 22 60
20 Corey Ray MIL OF 22 60
21 Michael Kopech CWS RHP 20 55
22 Rafael Devers BOS 3B 20 55
23 Manny Margot SD CF 22 55
24 Vladimir Guerrero TOR 3B 17 55
25 Cal Quantril SD RHP 21 55
Rank Name Team Position Age FV
26 Tyler Glasnow PIT RHP 23 55
27 Mickey Moniak PHI OF 18 55
28 Reynaldo Lopez CWS RHP 22 55
29 Jason Groome BOS LHP 18 55
30 Nick Senzel CIN 3B 21 55
31 Riley Pint COL RHP 19 55
32 Jorge Alfaro PHI C 23 55
33 Delvin Perez StL SS 18 55
34 Clint Frazier NYY OF 22 55
35 Ronald Acuna ATL CF 19 55
36 Brent Honeywell TB RHP 21 55
37 Francisco Mejia CLE C 21 55
38 Kyle Lewis SEA OF 21 55
39 Robert Gsellman NYM RHP 23 55
40 Blake Rutherford NYY OF 19 55
41 Kolby Allard ATL LHP 19 55
42 Alex Verdugo LA CF 20 55
43 James Kaprielian NYY RHP 23 55
44 Jose DeLeon TB RHP 24 55
45 Brad Zimmer CLE CF 23 55
46 Mitch Keller PIT RHP 20 55
47 Jeff Hoffman COL RHP 23 55
48 Kevin Maitan ATL 3B 17 55
49 Leodys Taveras TEX CF 18 55
50 Josh Bell PIT 1B 24 55
Rank Name Team Position Age FV
51 Ian Happ CHC 2B 22 55
52 German Marquez COL RHP 21 55
53 Sandy Alcantara StL RHP 21 55
54 Ian Anderson ATL RHP 18 55
55 Triston McKenzie CLE RHP 19 55
56 Matt Manning DET RHP 18 55
57 Luis Ortiz MIL RHP 21 55
58 Isan Diaz MIL 2B 20 55
59 Josh Hader MIL LHP 22 55
60 Braxton Garrett MIA LHP 19 55
61 Aaron Judge NYY RF 24 55
62 Max Fried ATL LHP 23 55
63 Kyle Tucker HOU OF 20 55
64 Yohander Mendez TEX LHP 22 55
65 Amir Garrett CIN LHP 24 55
66 Nick Gordon MIN SS 21 55
67 Franklin Barreto OAK SS 21 55
68 A.J. Puk OAK LHP 21 55
69 Christian Arroyo SF 3B 21 55
70 Luiz Gohara ATL LHP 20 55
71 Jharel Cotton OAK RHP 25 55
72 Matt Strahm KC LHP 25 55
73 Dom Smith NYM 1B 21 50
74 Walker Buehler LA RHP 22 50
75 Hunter Renfroe SD OF 24 50
Rank Name Team Position Age FV
76 Adrian Morejon SD LHP 18 50
77 Justin Dunn NYM RHP 21 50
78 Fernando Tatis, Jr. SD 3B 17 50
79 Anthony Alford TOR OF 22 50
80 Brandon Woodruff MIL RHP 23 50
81 Carson Kelly StL C 22 50
82 Andres Gimenez NYM SS 18 50
83 Kevin Newman PIT SS 23 50
84 Lucas Erceg MIL 3B 21 50
85 Chance Sisco BAL C 22 50
86 Tyler Beede SF RHP 23 50
87 Dustin Fowler NYY CF 22 50
88 Anthony Banda ARI LHP 23 50
89 Willie Calhoun LA 2B 22 50
90 Raimel Tapia COL CF 22 50
91 Jorge Mateo NYY SS 21 50
92 Jahmai Jones LAA CF 19 50
93 Mike Soroka ATL RHP 19 50
94 Zack Collins CWS C 21 50
95 Juan Soto WAS OF 18 50
96 Sean Reid-Foley TOR RHP 21 50
97 Justus Sheffield NYY LHP 20 50
98 Carson Fulmer CWS RHP 22 50
99 Ke’Bryan Hayes PIT 3B 19 50
100 Jesse Winker CIN OF 23 50





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

257 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
dougo
9 years ago

Excellent work as always! I’m liking the decision to slot Espinoza so high, as I’ve personally been much higher on him than the consensus which seems to have him in the 20-25 range. I’m also glad to see Jesus Sanchez get a little shout out. Looking forward to your thoughts on him.

lukeMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  dougo

Espinoza is one of my faves too. Though I’m curious as to the Vlad, Jr. analysis when the more common read is that he is NOT a free swinger like his father. He had a 35/33 K/BB in the Appalachian league. So I’m not sure I am buying him at 55. Yes, he will end up slow and maybe stuck without a position but at 17 he is beloved by KATOH already and I think will rocket up this list by end of this year. Maybe we are a bit scared to hype the famous name and be wrong.

Brians Sticky Sock
9 years ago
Reply to  luke

Vlad Sr averaged 56 walks, 74 strikeouts a year in his career, his reputation as a free swinger is overstated. Obviously, some of those walks were intentional, but he’s not a guy who would only take 10 walks a year with a 310 OBA.

YKnotDisco
9 years ago

I would describe Vlad Sr as a free swinger; 45.1% O-Swing% (1st in the pitch/fx era), 78.5% Z-Swing% (1st), 58.4% Swing% (2nd, by .2%) and a 39.8% Zone% (1st, why throw him a strike?). All of this is from a 2900 PA sample. I don’t see his reputation as overstated.

kldub4life
9 years ago
Reply to  YKnotDisco

Vlad had once in a generation bat to ball skills which made his free swinging nature almost a non issue lol.

realitypolice
9 years ago

The low K rate is a testament to the absolutely ungodly ability he had to put the bat on the ball no matter where it was. The walk rate is a testament to how absolutely stupid you’d have to be to throw more than a few pitches per at-bat anywhere near the strike zone. But he most definitely was a free swinger.

screehanMember since 2016
9 years ago

Just curious since you mentioned Otani, would Shintaro Fujinami place on your top 100 at this point?

Towel
9 years ago

Aaron Judge in the 60s and Matt Chapman not on the list.

Both 40 hit tools
Both 70 power
Chapman maybe best defending 3b in baseball WITH best IF arm in the minor leagues.

Mkay.

JasonPenniniMember since 2025
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

Looking at the list above only Aaron Judge and Eloy Jimenez have 70 potential future game power. You are high on Matt Chapman’s power IMHO. Not trying to be cantankerous or flippant, but what are you basing your 70 power grade on?

MLB.COM, FG (Farnsworth’s 2016 List), and BA rated his power in the 55-60 range.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  JasonPennini

You can call it a 60 if you want, but I have a hard time believing who has put up the numbers he has in the pitcher parks he has played in.

Chapman’s younger and has put up better power numbers than Judge at every stop in the minors.

So if Judge is a 70 power hitter now, then what is that based on if not the actual numbers?

MLB pipeline bumped his power from a 50 to a 60 this last season. They also had judge at 60.

JasonPenniniMember since 2025
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

You are basing too much on the numbers. These lists are about projection and whether tools will play at the MLB level. The statistics are only a piece of the puzzle. How power is generated and whether (or not) that projects to success at the MLB level is what scouts/talent evaluators care about

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  JasonPennini

If I was basing too much on the numbers I would say that Chapman has MORE power than Judge because that’s what they show.

As it stands I’d say they have the same power. Since pipeline both has them at 60 then I’ll say he’s a 60. If Eric wants to give Judge a 70 then that’s fine, then Chapman’s a 70.

JasonPenniniMember since 2025
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

*Places hands over ears*

La, la, la. Lalala!

mattMember since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  JasonPennini

Judge ISO per year in minors
2014 (22): 178
2015 (23): 193
2016 (24): 219
Chapman’s ISO per year in minors
2014 (21): 155
2015 (22): 316 in admittingly very homer friendly circumstances but still more impressive than anything Judge has done
2016 (23): 282 while this includes a short PCL stint, he had 277 ISO in more nuetral texas league

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

Midland park is neither HR friendly nor pitcher neutral. In the past the Texas league was close to the PCL in hitter friendliness but the new parks are bigger and in particular Midland suppresses LHH power, and by proxy, all fields power like Chapmans.

And Nashville has one of the largest home road splits in minor league baseball. In the 2 years it’s been open it’s been basically Las Vegas but for pitchers instead of hitters.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

A) Judge has put up much better numbers, in parks that are far more pitcher-friendly (it’s not close, regardless of how willfully you try to misinterpret our MiLB park factor data).
B) It’s based off his raw power, which, by definition, doesn’t show up in the numbers.

Towel
9 years ago

To misquote the greatest GM in baseball Brad Pitt: “if he’s a better power hitter, then why can’t he hit for more power?”

Towel
9 years ago

Numbers to back up this pitcher friendly league stuff? And since WRC+ is league adjusted how much does that even matter.

You’re cherry picking BA without looking at total offensive output and I guess I don’t understand that.

And you’re talking about Judges AAA numbers without pointing out he was repeating the level because he hit 224/308/373 with a 28.5% k rate the first time around.

CliffH
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

I don’t believe WRC+ is adjusted for MiLB park factors

jtmorgan
9 years ago
Reply to  CliffH

It isn’t. It’s league adjusted, but not park adjusted.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  JasonPennini

There is a big difference is risk between them, Chapman K’d 30% in AA, while Judge was 24% in AAA. While both have poor hit tools, Chapman’s is really in the danger zone for bust.

Towel
9 years ago

I’d say the biggest difference between them is that Chapman is a 70 glove with a 75 arm.

And it was 29.2% not 30.

(Worth noting that after a really rough start Chapman settled in the second half and K’d at… 24% the rest of the way.)

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

…and if you blatantly cherry-pick Judge’s numbers to only look at his final 42 games in AAA, he had a 21.7 K% (with a 212 wRC+ in the most pitcher-friendly park in the International League).

Towel
9 years ago

And Chapman Slugged .709 against LHP last year! Cherry picking is fun! And hedid it with Gold Glove defense.

Defense sets the floor and the bat sets the ceiling, thy have the same hit tool. Same power. But Chapman is maybe the best 3b glove in baseball. Judge is a COF with 1b one lower body injury and/or a couple years away.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

…huh?

I’m just applying the exact same standard to Judge as the one you’ve repeatedly tried to use to massage Chapman’s shitty contact numbers…and they still aren’t close.

Also, the idea that Judge is destined for 1B is entirely afactual, directly contradicting literally every scouting report on him, along with his Davenport numbers. He’s an excellent athlete, which is why so many scouts are optimistic on his hit tool.

It’s one thing to be a massive homer, but don’t be intellectually dishonest about it.

Towel
9 years ago

How many 6’7 outfielders have you heard of?

I’m not being dishonest I’m using historical norms. Just like you’re using with K rates and batting average.

He looks like a perfectly average outfielder now at 25 years old but yeah, I’m definitely not the first person to mention thst he’s bound for 1b.

Yankees fan?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

Giancarlo Stanton is the only guy with Judge’s build and athleticism in the past 10 years.

And who else has mentioned he’s bound for 1B, your father?

Support your arguments with evidence, or don’t make them.

BryzMember since 2019
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

If you’re going to argue that “29.2%” is “not 30%” then you’re just being flippant on purpose.

mattMember since 2023
9 years ago

Judge K’d 28.5% of time in his first partial AAA season, if the scouting reports on Chapman’s defense are right I’d say Judge has more risk. I’m a padres fan so I’m impartial

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

And then he adjusted and dropped that K% by 5 points this season, while significantly increasing his power output.

Hopefully Chapman does the same this year. If he does, I could see an argument to place him as a 60 FV.

Towel
9 years ago
Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

Wow, that is just a terrible article. Hey 3 out of 5 months he didn’t K as much! You would think that when neutral observers are arguing your homerism you may want to take a small step back.

Also, what Judge did in 2015 is irrelevant this is the current ranking and very few guys K at 30% in AA and make it as MLB hitters. Guys like Pedro Alvarez and Miguel Sano who K a ton in MLB kept it below 25% in AA.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

My favorite part is that he doesn’t seem to understand that AVG affects OBP and SLG.

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

LOL Athletics Nation is so bad, to think they used to be on the forefront of SBN blogs now it’s just an echo chamber of idiocy. I was looking at it a couple months ago and they were all posting as if Lowrie wasn’t the everyday 2B – they were acting like he was traded or released already, just because he played hurt and therefore poorly last year. Of course he’s fine now so they’re all backpeddling – the level of intelligence of the average poster there is so low – its weird, A’s fans are usually fairly well-knowledged about their team, but damn, the way they talk about “defensive stud” Joey Wendle – just, LOL. Homerfest 2017.

mattMember since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  JasonPennini

I like Eric a lot and he has a lot more credentials than me. But I think putting a future 70 on Aaron Judge’s game power is incredibly optimistic, too many moving parts in that swing, and doesn’t have the minor league production

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

Judge has also spent his career in the most pitcher friendly parks in the most pitcher-friendly leagues in organized baseball.

I do think Judge’s 120 wRC+ upside will either be as a .240 guy who hits 30 bombs or a .260 guy who hits 20-25.

JediHoyer
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

Chapman has no feel to hit, the feel to hit is very important to getting to the power in games imo.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

Yeah, someone with Chapman’s power having such a low BABIP in the minors is hugely concerning.

Everyone’s BABIP drops a ton when they hit the majors (Trout’s has dropped nearly 40 points, and he’s a guy who improved offensively in the majors).

People also usually see a jump in K%.

Chapman doesn’t have anything to give on either front, and O.Co isn’t the Cal League as far as HRs go.

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago

Great call, Chapman’s defense kind of means he can get away with being a .650-.700 OPS regular at 3B, which will be fine if the A’s are getting primo offense from SS & 2B, which they likely will out of whatever combo of Barreto, Shrock and Semien they end up using, but your point about how bad he is at getting bat on ball is really concerning.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

I swear, everyone sees that power and goes bananas and forgets that he has to make contact. If he does make contact he’s going to be great but there are so many reasons to think he won’t.

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Regardless, his defense at 3B means he will be a regular for a while, until his bat completely dies at the big league level, which luckily for him, means 20-25 homers and a .300 OBP is all he needs to do to prove himself. Obviously youd like to see 40+ homer power and a .350-.400 OBP, but Chapman might not be that guy.

Meanwhile Barreto just hit .500 in regular time in ST, if you want to talk about contact, he’s the one. If Barreto, who’s built like a running back already, can get on board the Turner/Donaldson/Martinez train, he’d be an MVP candidate right off the bat.

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

I think Judge is the next Sam Horn, don’t @ me.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

I would be ecstatic if Judge hit like Sam Horn (.240/.328/.468 with 34 HR/650 PA), while playing his customary strong RF defense.

And my main concern with Chapman is how hard it will be to manage a .300 OBP, considering his problems with both frequency and quality of contact.

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago

Judge isn’t a strong defender though, don’t know where you’re getting that from. He doesn’t have the athleticism for OF imo, too big a guy, not a great runner.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

If I’d never seen him play, looked at the numbers we have available, or read a scouting report on him, I might be inclined to agree with you!

Unfortunately, literally every source other than anonymous commenters on the internet who provide no supporting evidence for their claims pretty unanimously agrees that Judge is a very capable defender and an exceptional athlete for his size.

He got multiple D1 offers to play TE.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

Towel’s getting downvoted like crazy for this but I agree. Chapman is a potential gold glover at third, has the same contact issues, and only a little less power. So while may have a little less power but I think that the relative safety of the defense at a higher-value position gives him a better likely outcome than Judge. Of course we’re talking the difference between someone the author gave a 55 and a 50, so it’s not like there’s a huge difference there, but…I think that there’s a lot of hope being pinned on Judge making very, very necessary adjustments to make him an above-average offensive force. And I’m not sure why we’d expect Judge to make them and Chapman not to.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s because:

A) Judge doesn’t have the same contact issues (he had a 13.3 BB% and a 23.3 K% through his first 18 games of AAA to Chapman’s 10.0 and 25.7 respectively…and then there’s the 70 point gap in BABIP, which is a great proxy for hard contact in the minors).

B) Judge has actually shown the ability to make those adjustments. After flailing at AAA in 2015, he put up a lower K% at AAA this year than he’s had at any level since Low-A, while improving his BABIP by 30 points.

If Chapman does show the ability to adjust, and improves his contact (in both frequency and quality) this year, then he should be ranked higher in the summer update than Judge is here (maybe a 60). Until that happens, though, I think he’s appropriately ranked in the 75-132 range.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

We’ve been over this before so I don’t think we need to rehash every disagreement. But I don’t think that “the first 18 games” of anything is a good thing to go on especially when the differences in BB% and K% are that small.
But really, I’m down on Judge because I think he’s going to have a 40 hit tool. And it is just really hard to be an offensive force with a 40 hit tool, even if you smoke it when you do hit it.
That said, it does seem like the hype train on Judge is starting to slow down among prospect writers. Sickels puts Judge at #10 in the Yankees organization (which seems a bit low even to me), Eric put him at #61 here, Baseball America put him at #90. But we still have KLaw putting him at #44 at MLB.com at #22. So it’s not like there’s a big consensus on him, at least not anymore.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That should read “from his professional debut through his first 18 games of AAA at age 23,” haha. My bad on the SoC sentence structure.

My point is that if you think Judge profiles as a 40 hit guy, then Chapman, who has never shown anything resembling either Judge’s ability to hit for average or the ability to make swing adjustments and cut down on Ks, can’t possibly profile as more than a 30 hit guy…and that just isn’t MLB-caliber offense for anyone other than an elite defender at five positions.

BipMember since 2016
9 years ago

since this thread is still going, y’all should check out the question I asked in Eric’s chat about this

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m down on Judge because his defense is really bad.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

Based on…

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago

His bad defense and too big body?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

If every reputable scouting report and Davenport’s numbers didn’t directly contradict that opinion, you’d have a much stronger case.

Unfortunately, they do. So, you don’t.

kldub4life
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I wonder how him being a Yankee plays into the optimism ???

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago
Reply to  kldub4life

Exactly. A long, long time. Remember how riled up NYY media got over Dean Anna being good for literally 2 weeks?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  kldub4life

I think that’s part of it…but the fact that he demonstrated the ability to make adjustments after having contact problems in his first AAA stint also gives evaluators confidence that he’ll be able to adjust going forward.

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
9 years ago

First name that popped into my head when reading Cody Bellinger’s write up…Kris Bryant.

BipMember since 2016
9 years ago

Bellinger may have that kind of power if he develops. However, Bryant’s swing looks like he’s swatting flies, and doesn’t particularly care if he hits them (even though he does hit them). Bellinger’s swing looks like whatever the Tasmanian Devil is always doing.

jrubyMember since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  Bip

Chasing rabbits?

BryzMember since 2019
9 years ago
Reply to  jruby

No, that’s Elmer Fudd.

AlexTheGreat
9 years ago

Rowdy Tellez not even in consideration, eh?

jbizzy
9 years ago
Reply to  AlexTheGreat

Unfortunately not. Not enough power for a plodding 1B type.

Philbert
9 years ago
Reply to  jbizzy

Yeah, Rowdy Tellez’s problem is the lack of power.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  AlexTheGreat

weird, given he’s probably the best 1B prospect in baseball.

jgaztambideMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  AlexTheGreat

Compare his stats side by side with Bellinger last year in the same league at the same age. I think people are sleeping on Rowdy big time

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  jgaztambide

He’s like Bellinger in a lot of ways, including the weird swing. But Bellinger’s a stud. His power is crazy and his defense is likely to be very good (even at 1st). If Tellez makes the right adjustments he’s an above-average 1st baseman. If Bellinger makes the right adjustments he’s an all-star. I like Rowdy too, but not quite that much.

jgaztambideMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I prefer Bellinger too, I just don’t think the difference between them is as large as the rankings would make them seem. I certainly give credit to Bellinger for the better defensive value (and likely better baserunning too), but comparing the bats side by side, I don’t think Rowdy has anything to apologize for (and I’ll take the lower K% too, thank you!)

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  jgaztambide

Bellinger’s athleticism gives him better feel to hit which (along with his full extra grade of power) means that scouts trust him to make adjustments to the MLB better than a guy who can barely play 1B.

Dirkdiggles
9 years ago

Crazy how no matter how many times its repeated people will not listen.

These lists are not about stats. You can’t just say, insert your favorite players stats, were better than, insert highly ranked players stats, how come he’s not higher rated. Because league, age, athletic ability, pedigree, fluidity, mechanics it could be a million things

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  Dirkdiggles

but what if (relevant) stats continually beat out the predictions of interweb scouting gurus?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

…and the predictions of interweb scouting gurus also continually beat out relevant stats.

Everyone who talks about prospects regularly can point to 10 guys they were right on, despite what “X” said, but there will also be 10 prospects that “X” was right on, despite what they said.

Damaso
9 years ago

tbh I’d like to see a list of players that were ranked much higher than their relevant contextualized stats would seem to indicate, and see how well they’ve turned out. Offhand I don’t think the list would look great but I could be wrong.

Meanwhile, the examples of off the radar guys like, say, Betts, really reinforce the idea that scouting the statline is really valuable.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Of course, Betts is a guy who lost his eligibility (and was in the majors by the time Midseason lists came out in July) the same season he got out of A-ball and quelled fears about his physicality.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Well, batwise, there’s no reason to think Bellinger is better. Any advantage comes solely from his purported defensive ability (though the expectation that he moves from milb 1B to a tougher defensive position in MLB seems to be a stretch).

They’re 4 months apart in age and have played at the same level.

2016 AA

Cody: 465pa, 12.7bb%, 20.2k%, .287babip, .263avg, .221iso, 142wrc+
Rowdy: 514pa, 12.3bb%, 17.9k%, .324babip, .297avg, .233babip, 152wrc+

2015 A+

Cody: 544pa, 9.6bb%, 27.6k%, .314babip, .264avg, .274iso, 130wrc+
Rowdy: 148pa, 9.5bb%, 18.9k%, .293babip, .275avg, .198iso, 143wrc+

Both display similar patience and power, but Rowdy with much better contact skills.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Meanwhile, Bellinger is far more athletic, has a better swing and bat speed, and has more raw power.

If they have the same production, and scouts think Bellinger has room to grow while Tellez is essentially a finished product, then Bellinger is a better prospect.

…and then there’s the fact that Bellinger’s a 70 1B while Tellez is a 40.

Tellez has to be nearly 20 runs better offensively to produce the same value.

Damaso
9 years ago

well his “better swing and more raw power” has so far been more strikeouts and similar power. and Tellez has also received 70 grades for his raw power from scouts.

And why would anyone think Tellez is a finished product, when he’s been young for every level and improving every year?

I have no problem with people valuing Bellinger’s defense and saying it makes him a better prospect than Rowdy. But Bellinger at #13 and Rowdy not even top-150? please.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

And that’s because he’s less polished than Tellez, haha.

Like I said below, ARL is a proxy, not a catch-all, when it comes to projectability.

Bellinger’s superior athleticism, bat speed and feel to hit means that scouts are more confident that he’ll be able to make the necessary adjustments to succeed in the MLB than Tellez…and since they already have similar results, that means he’s a much better prospect.

I think Rowdy’s an interesting guy to keep an eye on, but I also think there are very real reasons to prefer Bellinger offensively.

BernandezMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

I like Rowdy, too, but if all we need to do to compare prospects is look at their stats, what do we need prospect lists for?

I think a big part of the difference in ranking does in fact lie in their defense. Bellinger is a sure-fire 1B who scouts think could comfortably play OF if needed. Tellez is fringy at 1B and might be more of a DH type. If he’s a DH, he’s of no use to half the teams in the league, and his offensive floor has to be that much higher as a result.

Bellinger shot up prospect lists this year compared to his ranking last year because he dropped his strikeout rate by 7% while moving up a level. Consider that Fangraphs only had Bellinger ranked #8 on the Dodgers list last year.

If this were a fantasy top 100 list, I agree Rowdy should absolutely be on there. For a real baseball list, I’m not sure he has the resume yet.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  Bernandez

yeah a little more improvement and he can get his K rate down to rowdy’s level. then he’ll shoot up even higher.

DoubleZee
9 years ago

Surprised that Tyler O’Neill didn’t make the list. How many times has a 21 year old southern league MVP not made the top 100? Over concerned about his contact ability and fielding, perhaps? What am I missing?

ShauncoreMember since 2019
9 years ago
Reply to  DoubleZee

Southern League MVPs (regardless of age I’ll admit):

2000 Joe Crede
2001 Josh Phelps
2002 Aaron Miles
2003 Corey Hart
2004 Richard Lewis
2005 Delmon Young
2006 Joey Votto
2007 Evan Longoria
2008 Gaby Sánchez
2009 Desmond Jennings
2010 Dave Sappelt
2011 Paul Goldschmidt
2012 Hunter Morris
2013 Marcus Semien
2014 Jake Lamb
2015 Max Kepler
2016 Tyler O’Neill

Some great names but also some not great names. It’s a nice superlative but the overall profile matters too, and O’Neill has struck out 25-30%+ at a few stops

DoubleZee
9 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Thanks for the list. Out of curiosity, is there anyway to quickly find the age of each winner?

tmeasterMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  DoubleZee

2000 Joe Crede 22
2001 Josh Phelps 22
2002 Aaron Miles 23
2003 Corey Hart 21
2004 Richard Lewis 24
2005 Delmon Young 19
2006 Joey Votto 22
2007 Evan Longoria 21
2008 Gaby Sánchez 24
2009 Desmond Jennings 22
2010 Dave Sappelt 23
2011 Paul Goldschmidt 23
2012 Hunter Morris 23
2013 Marcus Semien 22
2014 Jake Lamb 23
2015 Max Kepler 22
2016 Tyler O’Neill 21

Inge15Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  DoubleZee

From 2015 to 2016, O’Neill cut his K rate and raised his walk rate–leading to a 24 point wRC+ increase–while making the biggest jump in the minors and being the 6th youngest player in the Southern League.

This ranking requires some explanation.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Inge15

It’s probably because a 26% K-rate still isn’t good, haha. Or it may have been driven by people pitching around him, rather than a genuine improvement by O’Neill (like Nick Williams’ was in 2015).

Or maybe Eric just hates O’Neill’s swing, and thinks 2016 was a fluke.

It’s his list, after all.

evo34Member since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  Inge15

“This ranking requires some explanation.”

This whole list requires a lot of explanation. I don’t think we have to worry about Longenhagen being picked off by an MLB team any time soon.

jrubyMember since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  evo34

You a douche. Now I hope that these 100 prospects finish in this exact order in career WAR just to make you look even worse.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  DoubleZee

I love Tyler O’Neill, and unless I’m missing something he improved a lot in 2016 (higher level, fewer K’s, more walks, same crazy # of homers). He’s only 21 and he’s at AA. There’s some risk but I think that the combination of the ability to make adjustments, age/level combination, and the fact that he’s raked everywhere makes him a really good prospect.

mike sixelMember since 2016
9 years ago

I hope someone with more time than me builds a table or 4 about when/where these players were acquired (round and year drafted or signed….).

Would also love some kind of article on players under, I don’t know, 25 on the MLB roster plus the minors, to show strength of the systems that included young, under control, players.

Brock244
9 years ago

Benintemdi > Moncada seems to be the consensus among the industry, interesting that you think Moncada is a 70 fv

To me I think 70 FV is certainly pushing it for Moncada. The swing and miss is a huge concern, and there have been statically very few players with that swing rate in minors who have been good players. I just can’t put him on the same tier Correra and Seager where given the k issues and defensive questions. If he doesn’t improve k rate I think best case is something like a springer/upton type player, which is obviously valuable but not quite potentially hall of fame good like Correa. Obviously he’s great prospects (top 5 for sure) but I certainly disagree with the 70. I think of there’s any prospect who you could argue being a 70 FV it would be Benintendi with the potential 70/60 bat and above avg defense/base running and ability to play up middle

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Brock244

Moncada has the highest upside of any hitter in baseball. I think Eric likes guys like that. But I’m with you, I think there’s a lot more risk here. I’m more comfortable betting the under on a lot of these guys who have struggled with contact, even one with Hall-of-Fame potential if he gets it solved.
(Of course, he’s probably still a big leaguer if he has contact issues.)

redsoxu571
9 years ago
Reply to  Brock244

Here’s the ultra-basic, qualitative outlook for each:
Benintendi- ultra high floor, plenty high ceiling
Moncada- plenty high floor, ultra high ceiling

How you distinguish between the two basically comes down to how much you prioritize upside versus “safety”. Most lists seem to be “playing the odds” and going on a probability basis, and I think in that case you take Benintendi. But it’s fair to weight upside more, and if you do this can easily be the result.

You’re right about the risks involved with Moncada’s strikeouts, but I think you have it backwards; if he doesn’t improve his k-rate, he would LIKELY be ticketed to a Springer/Upton type result. It doesn’t make sense to say what the “best case” would be if someone’s biggest flaw is never addressed, and Moncada’s reasonable “best case” is a player who impresses skills-wise on a Mike Trout level (even though he likely would never achieve the polish Trout also brings to the table).

I also think people are acting far too certain about the odds of Moncada overcoming the K issue. He has a unique development profile with gaps that weren’t really his fault, so we can’t get as good a read on his chances of fixing the issues. We should just sit back, enjoy the ride, and see what we end up with.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

To be fair, the whole point here is to try and figure out what this guy will be. I’d rather make a prediction and be wrong than sit it out. I do agree that he’s probably still a legitimate big leaguer if he can’t fix the strikeouts, get more lift, and dramatically improve his defense. But his floor is probably more Drew Stubbs than George Springer, which is still a pretty high floor.

Jonathan Sher
9 years ago

On the profile page of Andrew Benintendi, one of your fellow FG writers wrote, “As shown by his early big league experience, the 22-year-old outfielder has some work to do against southpaws as the left-handed hitter batted just .179 (vs .338 against right-handers), albeit in limited at-bats. For 2017, Benintendi could find himself in a platoon with lefty-masher Chris Young which will diminish some of his fantasy value in the coming year.”

Are you at all comfortable with this assessment? The sample size was 28 at-bats against left handers. Benintendi in the minors last year hit lefthanders BETTER than he did righthanders, with an OPS of 1.069 in A+ and 900 in AA; in 2015, he hit lefthanders not as well but solidly, with a .782 OPS in A-ball and .827 OPS in short-season A ball.

Are scouts at all concerned Benintendi will struggle against lefthanders? Is anyone in Boston really considering platooning him (because I see no evidence of that)? Are you comfortable with profiles of key prospects on FG that may be starkly different than your own?

redsoxu571
9 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan Sher

I’d say it’s just as likely that Bradley is involved in a platoon than Benintendi is (you still want at least a couple of LHHs in your lineup vs LHP, and Benintendi has hinted that he can handle i). Benintendi can also play CF, so it would be easy enough to give JBJ days off against some tough LHPs, put Young in LF, and Benintendi in CF.

Keep in mind that Young could also be ticketed for DH duties against LHPs. Moreland won’t start against LHP, so Ramirez likely would play 1B, Young DH, and then Benintendi and JBJ might both still start.

Expect the manager to allow both a chance to show how they are handling LHP earlier in the season before settling more on the guy who is doing a better job.

D.K. WillardsonMember since 2020
9 years ago

On Moncada, there are significant mechanical issues that are driving his high K rate. These issues require a much earlier than average point of no return in the swing. Just a first approximation, but looks to be 2 clicks or .03 sec on a .16 sec base so almost 20% disadvantage relative to average. Most players have a “natural” K rate that doesn’t change much regardless of mechanics. Major swing transformations like J.D. Martinez who’s K rate didn’t really change much support this. Moncada appears to be an exception who has identifiable K-contributing mechanics. His path from the left is decent, but without a major overhaul, he simply won’t have enough time against MLB pitching to make late/effective decisions. The swing from the right is such that I will be surprised if he doesn’t completely abandon it altogether. His potential is undeniable and he is one of the few players I’ve seen with significant K upside (or maybe that’s K downside?). Whether he’s able to find and fix it is another story.

Dooduh
9 years ago

Excellent list. Prob the best one I’ve seen so far.

A few notes:
Rosario at 3 and a 65FV but w/o any single component a 65FV implies a sum greater than the parts player..?

You really think Christian Arroyo has a 70FV bat?

No Hansen or Szapucki on the list or considered??

And finally again, not quibbling with Dom Smith at 73 but his listed weight of 185 is a joke. He’s a lot closer to 285 than 185.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
9 years ago

I love you.

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
9 years ago

The name that really jumps out at me is Delvin Perez at 33. You have him ahead of older, more established luminaries such as Honeywell, Zimmer, Bell and Hader. This, even after coming off a drug bust which has knocked such guys as Dee Gordon from the perch of trust among baseball enthusiasts. Very surprising.

What differentiates Perez from Barreto (#67) at the similar position? Is it only because you think Barreto doesn’t stick to shortstop? Barreto has proven he can hit and get about 15 homers or so as well. Is Perez going to be better than that by such a large margin to halve his ranking at #33? I’m skeptical.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  LightenUpFG

More than that, what’s the difference between Adames at 17, Perez at 33, and Barreto at 67?

BipMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

They are three different people with different brains/bodies.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  Bip

But their tools are so similar, (with Barreto having the best hit tool of the bunch) that it’s worth wondering why the discrepancy.

CC AFCMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

I mean, you’re talking two 55s and a 60. I don’t think it’s accurate to say Eric’s grading them with a big discrepancy.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Right. So why is the 60 hit tool guy so much lower than the other two when the rest of the tools are the same? That’s the discrepancy.

I can see Perez in the 30s. Kid is 18 and tons of projection.

But why is Adames at 17 and Barreto in the low 60s when all the tools are the same except the hit tool, in which Barretos is higher?

CC AFCMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

He also has Adames at a full grade higher game power than Barreto.

I also don’t want to put words in Eric’s mouth, but I think the fielding grades are relative to position. That is, I don’t think he’s grading Bellinger’s 70 field as relative to the entire league, i.e. that Bellinger would provide elite fielding value. That would be next to (maybe entirely) impossible for a 1B to pull off. I think it’s just saying Bellinger would be a 70 at 1B. If that’s right, then he says he has Barreto projected at CF, so a 45 fielding CF would be less valuable than a 45 SS.

In any event, it still only results in the difference between 55 and 60 overall. So I still think it’s not a big difference.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Pretty sure he’s got Barreto as a 45 field at SS and no grade on his CF. He just thinks he may end up there.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

I was averaging their raw and game and I think a 45 to 50 is equal in difference to a 55-60 hit tool.

And when you’re talking about middljng plus power, I think most people would bet on the guy with the better hit tool.

Just curious as to why Eric went the other way so hard.

slamcactusMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

Look at the writeups. Eric thinks Adames may stick at SS while he doesn’t think Barreto even stays in the infield. That’s a huge difference. If Barreto makes a conversion to the OF his defense becomes a huge wild card, even if he’s slotted in at CF.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  slamcactus

No he thinks that Tampa Bay has a different organizational philosophy about what they think constitutes a SS.

The difference between a 50 and 45 defending SS seems smaller than the difference between a 55 hit and 40 run, and 60 hit and 60 run, doesn’t it?

So again, why the huge discrepancy?

dougo
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

I think you’re putting way too much weight into FV grades. They’re general predictive scores, not rock solid analyses. Learn to appreciate contexts.

BipMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

What my comment meant to illustrate is that a grand total of 50 spots on a ranking list that theoretically considers thousands of minor-leaguers is not that much. Even tools grades are quite blunt when considering the fact that, again, these are three entirely different people. If Eric said that the difference between the three was entirely makeup, would that satisfy you? Maybe Adames calls his mother every day and Perez eats a little too much ice cream and Barreto struggles with his body image. Do you see my point?

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  Bip

I would totally be okay with that, Barreto is said to be extremely coachable, and gets rave reviews for his approachability by scouts and people who work on the farm. I’d like to know how much better Adames and the recently caught for taking PEDS Perez are.

slamcactusMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  LightenUpFG

I’m guessing the comment about Barreto’s poor infield actions plays into that. The gap between 33 and 67 seems big but he gives both Perez and Barreto a 55 FV tag, so we’re talking about small differences between two guys who are roughly in the same tier. Makes sense if you view Perez as someone with a good chance to stick at SS and Barreto as a guy without a current defensive home.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  slamcactus

More talking about the difference between 17 and 67. Barreto better hit better run. Same field now, maybe Adames becomes a 50 field to Barretos 45.

I’m okay with the rankings. I’d just like to know why the huge difference.

slamcactusMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

They don’t have the “same field.” Adames is a 45 now as a SS, potentially future 50, Barreto’s a 45 as a guy who’s speculatively penciled in as a CF who Eric doesn’t think has a home in the infield. That’s a big difference. I obviously can’t speak for Eric, but I suspect if he put a tool grade on Barreto purely as a SS without taking into account a potential move to the OF, that grade would be lower than 45.

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
9 years ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Thanks slamcactus. I guess that has to be the reason to roll with if Eric isn’t replying. I suppose I was more interested in why Perez is so highly regarded aside from being considered a “star” with minimal evidence at this point. He doesn’t read like a star to me when compared to some others below him on the list.

Forrest Gumption
9 years ago
Reply to  slamcactus

It’s funny that Barreto has played his entire pro career at SS (excluding fall ball) but almost all prospect rankers say “he has no defensive home”.

evo34Member since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  LightenUpFG

#33 is when I stopped reading the list. Delvin Perez is not a legitimate top 50 prospect.

tipsymcstaggersMember since 2016
9 years ago

Outstanding work, Eric, this is excellent!

mattMember since 2023
9 years ago

IMO Judge shouldn’t be on the list. 2016 was the first time Judge has ISO’d over 200 in a minor league season. His calling card is his raw power, but what evidence is there that it will truly play at 30+ HR’s power at any time in majors? The walk rate may make him a ok regular, but to me he has a good chance of being a platoon OF. But I’m not here to say I’m anywhere near as qualified as Eric

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

It’s important to remember how insanely pitcher-friendly Trenton and SWB are, relative to extremely pitcher-friendly leagues.

He’s also increased his power output in each season, and was on a 30 HR pace in AAA.

Towel
9 years ago

His SECOND stint in AAA mind you

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

Yes. Aaron Judge did spend the second half of 2015 in AAA, after needing just 63 games to master AA.

I guess if he was an elite prospect like Matt Chapman, he’d have needed to stay in AA through August of his age-23 season!

Towel
9 years ago

That I find it weird you’re completely willing to dismiss Judges first couple hundred PAs at AAA but for some reason completely unwilling to dismiss Chapman’s at AA

clance
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

I actually would be much more willing to dismiss the AAA PAs as well. I’ve often heard that the first time batters start to see good breaking pitches from pitchers is AA and if you struggle there it suggests you’re have trouble with breaking pitches which can be hugely exposed. At AAA you start to see better command so needing to adjust there could mean a player is being too passive or aggressive or just isn’t super used to dealing with pitches on the edge of the zone which requires a small mental adjustment instead of a big development that allows a player to better deal with breaking pitches. I don’t know how much this applies to these two specifically but I believe that in general this principal will hold.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  clance

Yeah this is extremely anecdotal and I’m not sure I buy it.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

K.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

I’m not “unwilling to dismiss Chapman’s at AA.”

I just understand that if you’re looking at Chapman’s final 42 AA games, the appropriate comparison is Judge’s final 42 AAA games, not his entire body of work at the level.

I genuinely don’t understand why you’re struggling with this…

Joe Joe
9 years ago

I’m surprised Eric had Martes highest rated Astros prospect as he seemed to be higher on Tucker in chats. Tucker greatly increased his ISO and BB% while reducing his Ks. Will be interesting to see if power spike in last half of year (partly Lancaster aided) is legit. The changes in BB% and K% make me think pitchers think power spike is legit.

mattMember since 2023
9 years ago

As a padres fan this list looks good to me 🙂

johndw28
9 years ago

I can’t take any top 100 list without Luke Weaver on it seriously.

MajorDanby
9 years ago
Reply to  johndw28

or dylan cozens. however, im sure if eric had a “stats-only” list, cozens would be on it, and probably number one.

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  MajorDanby

Where did he rate in the KATOH stats only page?

johansantana17Member since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  Towel

26th overall

Towel
9 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

Not bad!

Lunch AngleMember since 2016
9 years ago

Brent Honeywell’s screwball didn’t get a specific grade. Is that because it’s a unique pitch, nothing really to compare it to?

HarryLives
9 years ago
Reply to  Lunch Angle

It’s at least a 60 grade pitch. Also, since Honeywell doesn’t throw a splitter (well not yet, anyway, but there’s still time), I’m guessing that the pitch grade on it is Eric’s grade for the screwball.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
9 years ago

Thanks for the list!

Question for anyone who gets the reference: What does it mean to talk about Deleon’s flat fastball issue becoming Miltonesque? Can’t think of a pitcher named Milton to whom that would apply… or any pitcher named Milton, really.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
9 years ago

Eric is a literature fan and John Milton is a famous author/poet from the 1600’s (he wrote Paradise Lost). Is that reaching?

JediHoyer
9 years ago

Eric Milton.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
9 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

Thanks!

HarryLives
9 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

Eric Milton had nearly 1.5 standard deviations more rise than average on his four-seamer. I sure hope DeLeon’s four-seamer is that “flat”.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago

Good list. I like that these rankings feel like your own and are unapologetic. Well done!

Jack B
9 years ago

Jake Bauers not even in contention? KATOH absolutely loves him and nearly every other prospect ranking I’ve seen has him in the top 100.

slamcactusMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  Jack B

The gap between back-end top-100 list and outside of the top ~130 or so is small, and 1Bs with plus hit/fringe power are typically among the most divisive prospects, as are 1Bs with plus power/contact issues (another guy not here who’s on a lot of lists near the back is Bobby Bradley). I think we can chalk this one up to Eric being a bit lower on that prospect type than other evaluators (or, stated another way, that he has a higher bar than others for ranking 1B prospects vs prospects who can contribute some value with the glove – there are only 3 present-day 1Bs on the list).

shaq_diesel
9 years ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Bauers hasn’t been a 1B for over a year.

mattMember since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

No reputable source thinks he can play the OF respectably. If he’s a -10 DRS COF the batting line he has to put up to have value is huge

HarryLives
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

If the Rays own player development team, which spends more time evaluating Bauers in a week than every “reputable” prospect publication combined does in a year, isn’t a reputable source, then I agree with you. If Clay Davenport’s defensive metrics for minor leaguers, which had Bauers at +10 runs in the OF last year, aren’t a reputable source, then I agree with you. Hell, if you can show me where BA, Eric, BP, K-Law, MLB Pipeline, John Sickels, and the other “reputable” sources *all* say that Bauers can’t play the corner OF respectably, I’ll agree with you.

Eric doesn’t think Bauers can play any position but 1B, and he doesn’t think Bauers has any outstanding offensive tools aside from plate discipline. I’d argue that if there’s a class of hitters that most often outperform the power and hit tool projections of scouts, it’s the guys that have shown outstanding BB and K rates at the upper levels of the minors at a young age. ZiPS and Steamer already project Bauers as a league-average bat despite 2017 being his age-21 season and Bauers not yet playing above AA. KATOH loves him. He’s looked great at the plate in Spring Training and has hit two tape-measure shots (not bad for a guy with fringy power), including a 450-foot blast off a lefty on Sunday.

To be at minus 10 runs in an OF corner (the number you used), he would have to be one of the two or three worst defensive OFers in baseball. Mark Trumbo has averaged -10 UZR/150 over the past three years, so you’re basically saying he’ll be as bad a corner OFer as Mark Trumbo. That’s a hell of a statement to make for someone who I’m guessing has never even seen Bauers play the corner OF.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  HarryLives

Like Daric Barton!

Or James Loney!

Or Casey Kotchman!

Or Gaby Sanchez!

Also…Mark Trumbo’s defense is pretty much exactly what we should expect from a 1B with 35 speed trying to play LF, and it’s why Eric doesn’t think he sticks there.

The guys with Bauers’ profile who surprise everyone do it by combining their 105-115 wRC+ with good defense and baserunning, on the high end of the defensive spectrum.

It doesn’t really work if you’re limited to 1B, with Carter/Trumbo-esque OF defense.

HarryLives
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

Baseball America gave him a 50-speed grade and thinks he’ll be fine in the corner OF. You’re living in weird world if they’re not a reputable source.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  HarryLives

I was using Kiley’s grade from his FG page.

MLB.com gave him a 45.

shaq_diesel
9 years ago

Kiley hasn’t worked here for a year and a half. If you are reading 2 year old scouting reports and going on the internet to argue with informed commenters, let me know how this Turner fella the Nats picked up will do. I hear this Correa guy the Astros have is a pretty good prospect.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

“MLB.com gave him a 45”

I guess he’s gotten faster over the last two years!

Anyway, Bauers is either ranked in the 50-70 ragne or off people’s lists, based on whether they think he can stick in LF.

No one thinks his bat profiles at first.

vaakintolaMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  slamcactus

or down on his ability to transition to the OF

mattMember since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  Jack B

Honestly to me Bauers is overrated on most lists. He looks like Yonder Alonso x2 for me, a second division starter (or worse)

shaq_diesel
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

He is nothing like Alonso. Alonso was a 26 year old 1B in AAA. Bauers was a 19 year old RF in AA. Does Moncada remind you of Steven Souza?

mattMember since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

Bauers is 1B only or a terrible COF defender that hasn’t ISO’d 150+ in any minor league season. His major league output is likely to be similar to Alonso’s

vaakintolaMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

he reminds me more of eric hosmer than alonso. still not good, but at least an arguable regular.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  vaakintola

Hosmer is a better athlete, hit for far more power in the minors, and was an above average hitter in the MLB by his age-21 season.

It’s not really a fair standard to hold Bauers to.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

He’s not Yonder Alonso (who had extremely similar minor league numbers), matt!!!!

Obviously, he’s Daric Barton without the power.

HarryLives
9 years ago

Yonder Alonso was in his age-24 season before he had 200 AA plate appearances under his belt. Jake Bauers had 200 AA plate appearances as a young 20-year-old. There’s an ocean of difference. If you’re going to scout the stat line, the least you could do is get your head around the significance of a player’s age relative to level of the minors.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  HarryLives

Exactly. Daric Barton without the power.

HarryLives
9 years ago

If we’re just going to throw out minor-league statistical comps as if they really mean something, Derrek Lee, Adrian Gonzalez, Prince Fielder, and Justin Morneau were all among Bauers’ top KATOH statistical comps, and that was before he put up the best offensive year of his career as a 21-year-old in AA. Hell, let’s throw Freddie Freeman in there why we’re at it. There are definite statistical similarities, and there were similar questions about Freeman’s power. Listing these names is about as compelling an argument for Jake Bauers being a future All-Star as listing Daric Barton and Yonder Alonso is for Bauers being a second-division regular, which is to say not a very compelling argument at all.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  HarryLives

I mean…Freeman hit more bombs as an 18 year old in full season ball than Bauers has hit at any level…and when he was 2016 Bauers’ age, he put up a .200 ISO in the International League (and once more hit more bombs than Bauers has managed at any level).

Fielder never had an ISO below .200 in the minors.

Lee hit 34 bombs in AA as 20 year old.

HarryLives
9 years ago

The KATOH algorithm, which is a hell of a lot better than you or me at comparing players based on meaningful minor-league stats, came up with the those comps, aside from Freeman. Take it up with Chris Mitchell.

If only those professionals (1) actually agreed on their assessments of players or (2) were right as often as they were wrong. You act like Eric’s opinion of Bauers’ defense and bat is held by all scouts. It isn’t.

Bauers has hit for more power as his minor-league career has progressed. Some guys, especially those that face advanced competition at a young age, hit for more power in the majors than they did in the minors. Like Freddie Freeman. With a ..150-180 ISO and competent defense in a corner, Bauers is a 2-3 win player. I think he’ll hit a lot of doubles, 15-20 HRs, and play an average to slightly below-average RF. I’m not a professional scout, but I’d wager my opinion of Bauers is a lot more informed than the snap judgment you made of him after reading a couple of scouting reports and looking at the stats of two players that reminded you of him.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  HarryLives

If only we had people whose job it was to differentiate between players with similar surface-level stats, and could tell us what kind of production to expect from Bauers!

At the end of the day, it’s Eric’s list. And he doesn’t like Bauers as much as you do, or MLB.com/BA do, because, like Law and BP, he thinks he’s limited to 1B.

I’m…sorry, I guess?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  HarryLives

If only we had people whose job it was to differentiate between players with similar surface-level stats, and could tell us what kind of production to expect from Bauers!

HarryLives
9 years ago
Reply to  matt

You have about as much original insight into Jake Bauers ability to play the corner OF as I have into how you take your coffee.

Jake Bauers had an ISO of .148 as a young 21-year-old in AA in 2016. He had an ISO of .150 (whoops!) as a 20-year-old between high A and AA in 2015. For a guy who knows nothing about Bauers, you sure do have a lot to say about him.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  HarryLives

…I’m glad you agree that he doesn’t have nearly enough power to profile at 1B!

His position on these lists is entirely determined by whether or not the writer believes he can play a passable LF.

If they don’t think he can hack it, they don’t have him in the top 100…because the one thing everyone is certain of is that he doesn’t have the bat for 1B.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

WHERE’S [insert prospect here]?!!! THIS LIST SUCKS, AND YOUR TEH BIASED!

Rico BrognaMember since 2025
9 years ago

Yeah, and why doesn’t your list match other lists? Aren’t all evaluators supposed to have the same exact opinion on each player?

johansantana17Member since 2026
9 years ago

The Red Sox have recently traded away prospects #1, #10, #21, and #23.

And they still have prospects #2, #22, and #29. And Chris Sale, Drew Pomeranz, and Craig Kimbrel.

Richard Nixon
9 years ago

Great job, Eric. Thanks.

One question: I saw you mention a couple times that a player’s bat may play at SS or CF but not 2B. Is the bar for a second baseman’s bat really higher than SS or CF?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Richard Nixon

SS and CF require some pretty rare physical traits and ability to put it all together. I think shifting has downgraded 2B a bit. But I don’t know that it’s *that* much higher…how many players do we think will play a legit 2nd base?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Richard Nixon

In 2016, 2Bs averaged a 101 wRC+.
SSs averaged 92.
CFs averaged 96.

jjezioraMember since 2022
9 years ago

I understand why Reid-Foley is where he is, but is he someone who could fly above a lot of the pitchers slotted above him pretty quickly if he shows maintenance of the command improvements? I mean if he can carve up AA like he destroyed A+ last year, should he not be more worthy than 5-6 of the RH starters above him on the list? Just curious, because I was wondering how long he would need to show improved command or whether there are other concerns that keep him where he is.

Rational FanMember since 2025
9 years ago

In re: to Zach Burdi.

Is someone like Burdi not listed because being a reliever only really effects ones floor and ceiling equally? The assumption being that many of these failed starters that are top prospect may be able to assume a similar elite reliever role? The reason I ask is because Fulmer gets listed with a floor being an elite reliever but I don’t think Fulmer could ever be as dominant out of the pen as Burdi, but the fact that Fulmer may be a serviceable starter gives him the leg up in the projections?

tmeasterMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

Burdi is listed in the “Other Prospects in Consideration” section.

Rational FanMember since 2025
9 years ago
Reply to  tmeaster

Yeah, I mean the reason why he doesn’t view him as a top 100 prospect. I think consensus is that Burdi is the best relief prospect in the minors by a good bit so just found it interesting that with the increased value of relievers in the big league game now that he wouldn’t make the list.

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc Pederson
9 years ago

I should probably preface my question, Eric, by saying that Sandy Alcantara is about 15-20 spots better than I’d have placed him. (I see him ~70th.)
But given the grades he and Michael Kopech received above, I’m curious why their rankings are more than 30 slots apart. (Rather amazingly, every one of their present & future grades were literally identical across the board.)
If anything, when two pitchers grade out the same, I would expect the one with the better history of durability to get the edge. At any rate, thanks for all the hard work, Sir.

Joe Joe
9 years ago

30 slots has very little value change at that spot in list as they are both in FV 55 tier. Longenhagen probably has a slight reason to list one higher than the other, but they essentially have same value.

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc Pederson
9 years ago
Reply to  Joe Joe

Thanks for responding, but with all due respect I’m not completely comfortable with that answer.
There is a meaningful difference between rating someone #21 and #53, regardless of the FV cutoffs, which are unavoidably somewhat arbitrary.
Or let me put it like this: Corey Ray is ranked 20th with a 60 FV, Kopech is ranked 21st with a 55, and Matt Strahm is ranked 72nd with a 55. I don’t believe Eric would say that Kopech is closer in value to Strahm than Kopech is to Corey Ray. See what I mean?
The ordinal rankings don’t have much meaning once we’re into the 150-200 range, that much is true. But inside a top 60, thirty slots means a great deal.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

Jesus, haha.

From the introduction to this article:

“Part of the reason I like FV is because it can illustrate how an on-paper gap that seems large may not actually be. The gap between prospect No. 3 on this list, Amed Rosario, and prospect No. 33, Delvin Perez, is 30 spots but the difference between their talent/risk/proximity profiles is quite large. The gap between Perez and prospect No. 63, Kyle Tucker, is also 30 numerical places but the gap in talent is relatively small. Below the list is a brief rundown of names of 50 FV prospects who didn’t make the 100. This same comparative principle applies to them.”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

I think a lot of what Eric likes in a prospect is having some combination of 3 things: a really, really high ceiling; playing SS or CF at a high level; and/or a sense that the guy can make adjustments.
Eric seems to be really confident that some players can make adjustments. I get why he says that about Lewis Brinson who has done a great job of tweaking his swing, but I don’t get why he thinks that about Corey Ray.
On defense, I get that someone like Dansby Swanson is going to get a high grade because he’s basically already a 3-win guy, but how much better is he going to get? Eric thinks he’s almost reached his ceiling already. Maybe it’s just not as fun to grade players who are likely 3-win players already, but is a guaranteed vintage-Alexei Ramirez or Erick Aybar a FV 65? Maybe that is.
Meanwhile, I wonder if we’re undervaluing the defensive requirements at 3B. It’s been a long time since we just stuck the slowpoke with a big arm at third. To me, anyone who can play 3B passably with the likely offensive profile of Rafael Devers is a star, and we might all be punishing guys like Maitan and Senzel for being 3rd basemen instead of 2nd/SS (but those guys are a looong way from the majors).
I also think that sometimes we all get carried away with the really high ceilings. Moncada and Judge are the ones I’m most worried about, because contact problems are pretty sticky.
I don’t have answers to any of these questions, but I wonder about whether the scouting consensus is wrong in these areas.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If a guy is a guaranteed 4-Win player, he’s (by the definition Eric lays out in the intro) a 65 FV guy.

Here’s the range that Eric expects Swanson to be in offensively

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=ss&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2016&month=0&season1=2007&ind=1&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=48293&players=0

With +5 SS defense, it’s a very good profile.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

Fair enough. I guess it’s always weird ranking guys who juuuust barely have rookie eligibility compared to the ones mashing A+. Most people are confident that Benintendi and Swanson are going to be above-average major leaguers, but we’re ranking them on the same list as Robles and Eloy Jimenez.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Of course, that’s what make it fun!

Robles and Jimenez could be 7 WAR guys, but they could also be 1 WAR guys. Swanson and Benintendi could be 3 WAR guys or 5 WAR guys.

The way different people value those outcomes is super interesting, and says a lot about them.

B_Agate
9 years ago

You have Luiz Gohara’s height and weight listed as zero.

Jim HMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  B_Agate

Best shape of his life.

LHPSU
9 years ago
Reply to  Jim H

100% walk rate

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  Jim H

#springTraining

Fanthead
9 years ago

There is much to process here and I’m still processing. But so far, Longenhagen’s list is thoughtful and a sheer treat to engage. So thanks, writer, for that. My second point is that I like how Longenhagen’s summaries often explain, doubt, or question, etc., the stats and grades. Despite the ceaseless use and refinement of numbers and measurements, prospecting is not pure science and we sometimes forget that both the observed and the observer are so thoroughly human that they sometimes can be impossible to predict.

Daniel
9 years ago

In all seriousness, what do the 20 clubs that passed on Delvin Perez have to say now? Do they defend the decision on brand/moral grounds? Do they admit they screwed the pooch? The Padres took Eric Lauer (!) over Perez.

evo34Member since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  Daniel

They’re saying, “Thank God we passed on that PED-using slap hitter whom only one random writer thinks is any good.”

Damaso
9 years ago

at what point do we expect devers to actually hit well enough to justify his continually high rankings?

Chill
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

How does June of last year sound?

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  Chill

Yeah, I think we’d be looking for more than one great month.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Dude was 19 in high A and he had an above-average batting line for the year, with a much better 2nd than 1st half. If he stalls out and stops getting promoted, then worry. He’s like Robles, where the combination of an above-average batting line and being really young for his level tends to predict good things.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“Above average” overall line, with unimpressive BB/K numbers, for an all bat prospect, even a year or two young for his level, does not justify a perennial Top-25 ranking, especially for someone who hasn’t played above A ball.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

I mean…he looks pretty damn close to Gary Sanchez with better contact.

Damaso
9 years ago

Sanchez was a borderline top-50 prospect at the same age, despite displaying more patience, and much more power, and playing catcher.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

…while also striking out far more often, and having makeup/effort issues that called into question his ability to stay at catcher, haha.

Sooted72
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

idk if i speak for everyone here or not, but personally i missed damaso’s ‘all red sox prospects are drastically and continually overrated’ shtick. it had been far too long! dont ever change bud!

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Sooted72

He sure has a ton of egg on his face for thinking Henry Owens was overrated!!!

He always fixates on one or two Sox guys that he thinks are overrated. In the last “generation” of prospects, it was Owens and Swihart.

Now it’s Devers.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

Actually, you’re pretty safe in saying ALL top prospects are overrated. You win way more than you lose if you just assume they’re all going to bust. But that’s not very sporting (or fun, for that matter).

Damaso
9 years ago

Devers and Espinoza i do believe are guys who would not rank nearly as high if it weren’t for the red sox association, that’s true. Very nice raw talents but guys this far away with these mediocre performances simply don’t get top-20 hype normally.

oh and moncada too – no way a guy with his contact and defense question marks can be the #1 prospect in baseball, imho.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Eh, most of these guys have Benintendi #1. Eric just prefers Moncada’s sexy upside…and it’s his list, haha!

He stole 45 bags with a .214 ISO and a 14.5 BB% as a 21 year old, and Eric believes in the 2B defense.

A better version of Kipnis isn’t out of reach.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  Sooted72

hey i always loved mook. xander was a great prospect too. love benintendi now. margot I thought was underrated too.

but i’m not gonna apologize for laughing at swihart being called a top 10 prospect, or devers/espinoza being gifted top 20 status with mediocre single A performance, or the absurd optimism on the pitching crew of rodriguez owens johnson rinaudo barnes workman. or the cecchinis and middlebrookses.

so many guys just handed top 50 status based on so little.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

As an AL East fan, my love for Betts, Bogaerts and Benintendi is a constant torture.

The only Sox player I’ve ever liked as much as that trio is Yooooooooooooooouk.

Brians Sticky Sock
9 years ago
Reply to  Sooted72

Actually, I wished I listened to him regarding Swihart… looks like another wasted year coming up. Even if he turns into something, that’s a roster space being used with no return for several years. Kind of a high cost.

bragam2018
9 years ago

Is Albert Almora still considered a prospect?

Brians Sticky Sock
9 years ago
Reply to  bragam2018

He’s had ~110 PA. And he’s only been up for a month & a half or so. Yes. He is still a prospect.

whonichol
9 years ago

“Some teams removed Groome from their 2016 draft board because of off-field issues”

I kind of doubt this is true. Sure, he slid down teams’ draft boards, but I haven’t seen it reported anywhere that he fell completely off of teams’ boards entirely. And judging from what has been leaked about what those issues actually were, I doubt any team was completely unwilling to draft him no matter what…

fawkesmulder
9 years ago
Damaso
9 years ago

Rowdy Tellez is 1.5yrs older than Rafael Devers, and has played one level up from him each year.

2016

Tellez (AA): 514pa, 12.3bb%, 17.9k%, .324babip, .297avg, .233iso, 152wrc+
Devers (A+): 546pa, 7.3bb%, 17.2k%, .328babip, .282avg, .161iso, 113wrc+

2015

Tellez (A+): 148pa, 9.5bb%, 18.9k%, .293babip, .275avg, .198iso, 143wrc+
Devers (A): 508pa, 4.7bb%, 16.5k%, .326babip, .288avg, .156iso, 118wrc+

yeah yeah, I know, don’t scout the statline.

but come on now.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

The homer surge at AA is park-related (really short right field) and he’s a pull-power guy. He’s a 1st baseman instead of a 3rd baseman (even if both him and Devers are probably going to have to move down a notch at some point). And scouts do not like his swing at all, and they think he’s too stiff to make adjustments. But he keeps moving up the ladder and not getting exposed. I think he’s a notch below Dom Smith as a prospect, in the same tier as Ronald Guzman.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

well, they’re both all-bat prospects, without much expected defensively. And Dom Smith doesn’t do anything with the bat beter than Rowdy, and has far less power.

as for the AA park, that’s just a guess – Rowdy has always been an elite raw power prospect, and his game power has increased steadily each year.

and yeah, I get they don’t love his swing, but if there was a real issue there I’m sure we would have seen some indication of it in his statline, especially in his K rate.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Devers is a bat-first prospect at third base, which is way more valuable that a bat-first at first. The AA park is only 306 feet to right field (compared to 336 for Dunedin). And players with holes in their swing get exploited all the time as they go up the ladder.
Re: Dom Smith–he is just a different prospect, with a much higher floor (but lower ceiling) because of his hit tool and defense. Pretty much everyone thinks he’s a big league regular, while Tellez is more boom or bust.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

eh. they’re all likely 1B. Rowdy actually is probably underrated glovewise but we’ll see.

These guys aren’t getting hyped on defensive value, and Rowdy’s bat has just been far better, topline and underlying, even though he’s barely tapped into his natural raw power yet.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Per Eric, scouts also don’t like that Rowdy gets to his power by sitting dead red on fastballs thrown with MiLB command, and are worried that breaking balls will eat him alive.

Devers’ swing is sexy (along with his being just generally more athletic than Tellez, which is part of why they believe in his ability to make adjustments and improve).

Stats matter, but they’re useless in the low minors without context.

Damaso
9 years ago

well, thank god I’m using contextualized stats and contextualizing them further, then.

And yeah, Eric says he’s worried about breaking balls beating him, Law says he’s worried about fastballs beating him, and yet Rowdy has yet to show even a hint of any of the swing and miss issues one would expect to see….and this is a kid at AA already, not a some kid still in single A. AA pitching is a big jump – arguably the biggest jump in the minors. And yet no swing and miss issues yet.

TBH, the rowdy hot takes are largely coming from the 2015 AFL – and from early in those games. That was where most of the in-person internet scouting of him took place, and he struck out 9 times in his first 21 at bats. Of course he was only 20, made a quick adjustment, and only struck out 11 times in his remaining 61ab. But as they say you never get a 2nd chance to make a 1st impression, and they haven’t had much (any?) in person scouting of him since.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

But you’re not contextualizing those stats in terms of his mechanics or approach (or the short porch in NH, for a dead-pull guy).

If he’s sitting dead red on poorly commanded fastballs, we should worry about both fastballs and breaking balls beating him, haha. Especially for a guy with athleticism questions and without exceptional batspeed.

AA is the biggest stuff jump, but the command jump comes in AAA. I want to see how he does against junkballers, because his only value comes from his bat. He needs to put up a 120 wRC+ to be a viable big league starter.

Damaso
9 years ago

well you can’t contextualize stats in terms of mechanics or approach. You can only look for indicators – specifically at BB, K, and contact numbers – and there’s been precisely zero red flags statistically in those departments. Just saying “his mechanics are bad” doesn’t contextualize the stats. And the thing is, most guys with “bad mechanics” you can see it in the statsline with their K rates.

As for the park issue, that’s just a theory without much backing. The fact is Rowdy has put up by far the best ISO on his team in each of the last 2 years. Last year he had an iso over 200 on the road. His elite raw power has been his carrying tool since draft day. Power really isn’t a question mark here. A guy like Bellinger actually has multiple teammates every year putting up similar ISO numbers. While a guy like Devers has been far down the ISO list on his teams. Rowdy is the only one that is clearly out slugging his teammates at each level (despite being the youngest).

also, he’s simply not a dead pull guy whatsoever – he is an all fields contact hitter which is precisely why his numbers are so great. The fact that he has elite raw power that has only recently started turning into game power just makes the package all the more impressive.

And then there’s the kicker – as a guy young for each level he has shown a dramatic in-season improvement every year, and a near flawless straightline progression at that. Last year was more of the same – he struggled badly to start in AA as a just-turned 21yr old, and had only a 67wrc+ in his first 27gms, before adjusting and just demolishing the level with a 178wrc+ over his last 97gms. He’s seen similar in season progression each season.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Hey, maybe everyone’s wrong on him!

Given similar production, though, I’ll always take the athlete.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

A pretty big difference is that Devers is a bat-first prospect, while Rowdy is a true all-bat guy.

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Oh look Damaso thinks a red sox player is over rated and a blue jays player is under rated. In other news, the sky is blue.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  victorvran

and I’m still wondering why Swihart was ranked so much higher than Pompey.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

I never really got the Swihart love…but it’s not like Pompey’s any good, either.

Give me the guy with more power and the tools to be a decent defensive catcher, if all else is fairly equal.

Damaso
9 years ago

and what if I told you that Pompey was the one with more power, and the more realistic ability to be a good defender at a premium defensive position?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Then I’d look at their career stats, and see that Pompey doesn’t have more power.

I’d also remember that there’s a 10 run difference in value between C and CF, so if they’re even close, Swihart’s far more valuable defensively.

Damaso
9 years ago

ISO

Pompey .163mlb, .079aaa, .187aa, .152a+, .131a
Swihart .115mlb, .073aaa, .187aa, .130a+, .133a

And Pompey can actually plays his position well.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Why don’t you include the PA, haha?

ISO doesn’t stabilize till you hit 550 PA, so let’s not pretend that Pompey’s MLB number means anything.

Sooted72
9 years ago

CLS-

did somebody tell you that if you added a ‘haha’ to every post that youd come across more likeable or something???

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Sooted72

…no?

I just find it fundamentally less obnoxious to write out “haha” than to type “lol,” when I’m trying to indicate amusement in this text-based medium, and I distrust anyone who believes otherwise.

It’s hard to overemphasize how little I give a shit about strangers on the internet finding me “likable.”

Now, did you have a point? Or are you just trying to score internet points with catty remarks of such low caliber that a 12 year old girl would roll her eyes?

victorvran
9 years ago

please, that is what a 12 year old would revel in. *smiley face*

I often disagree with you, CLS, but yeah, you comment here enough to where no one who frequents the comment sections would be under the assumption that you care about the opinion of others.

And again, that isn’t really a negative thing-you often do a good job of explaining why you think how you do, even if I don’t agree with your analysis, I can’t say you don’t try in many cases. Though I have come away with the impression you are a yankees fan from what seems like impartial responses.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  victorvran

Hah, guilty on all counts.

Sooted72
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

omg espn please do a damaso tor/bos prospects 30 for 30…

piano music… [narrator voice guy] what if i told you all red sox prospects were overrated and all blue jays prospects were underrated…

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Damaso, a lot of times you seem to just come off as a BJ homer and rs hater (I’m a fan of an NL Central team so unbiased), but I must give you credit for your continued push for it. And this isn’t at all sarcastic. You have a clear bias, but I don’t normally mind reading your posts.

You use facts and normally somewhat grounded analysis. Though you do sometimes let bias give way to honest sample sizes or fair comparison windows. I mentioned you saying “rs overrated bj underrated” because you always do, I do not however, consider you to be a troll.

I know you, and no one else here care about my particular opinion, but I commend you for being a homer-ish poster who does not make me cringe.

You come off more tactful than Jonforthegiants.

Jack Cecil
9 years ago

Did anyone else notice how many different uniforms Winker is wearing in his video?

weekapaug09
9 years ago

I know it’s easier to be calm when nine of your guys are on the list but I’d like to congratulate my fellow Braves fans for their absence in the comments. It’s refreshing.

I scrolled through expecting someone to be mad at something but nope, just silence. Props.

wildginge
9 years ago

Terrible list. The prospects from my favourite team are all ranked way too low, while certain Yankees/Cubs/RedSox guys are too high. The writers at a different site rate my guy as high as 76 but you have him in the 90s. Just terrible.

Please consider reranking them to my satisfaction.

Wolvendael
9 years ago

Thanks for all the work. Verdugo seems to be a bit of a polarizing prospect – most acknowledge the skill set, but seem to overlook his performance:age a bit IMO. In that regard, he’s been pretty elite. He’s always had excellent bat to ball skills, that has resulted in a >.300 batting average in something like 8/14 months of pro ball – all while being 2-3 years younger than the comp. 2 of those down months were in 2015, when he was making swing changes (that he abandoned) – and 3 of those “down” months were still around .280 this year. So all in all, he’s hit over .280 in something like 11/14 months of pro ball, all while being one of the youngest at each level. His swing has become more power-oriented, as he now generates a lot of lift. He hit 13 HR in the TL at age 20, which makes him one of the handful of guys since 2010 to hit double digit HR at that age in the TL (Bellinger, Mazara, Trout, Profar, Singleton, and Domingo Santana). But he did it with the lowest K% – 13%. Finally, that arm is insane. Led the league in 2015 in assists as a 19 year old, and topped out at 97 in high school. It’s a true 70 arm. Overall, I’d have him as a top 25, 65/65/50/50/70-type guy who can hit high in the order and give you innings in CF, but has the arm/range to play well above average in RF.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Wolvendael

His numbers:age:level combo has been awesome. He keeps getting dinged for amorphous “makeup” issues and because he developed physically early meaning the scouts don’t project him for more power. I think if you want to make him a borderline 55/60 guy that probably means you value right field defense more, or value the ability to play shortstop or rookie-ball fireballers less (both of which Eric seems to value very highly).

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, we do have to remember that ARL is really an approximation for projection and baseball experience — if a 19 year old built like a brick shithouse who has been on the showcase circuit since he was 9 puts up the same production as a lanky 22 year old (with the frame to add muscle) who played 3 sports in HS, give me the 22 year old, ARL be damned.

Wolvendael
9 years ago

+1 for “brick shithouse”

burts_beadsMember since 2025
9 years ago

It’s funny that Reyes still gets listed at 175, the dude is huge.

MetsoxMember since 2016
9 years ago

Amazing how much ink gets spilled on Rowdy Tellez…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Metsox

It’s actually more amazing that there aren’t more “why isn’t my team’s prospect on the list” questions. I was half expecting there to be a storm of questions about Brandon Nimmo, or Mauricio Dubon, or Bobby Bradley, or…who am I kidding, I don’t know who else local fanbases are irrationally excited about these days.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I remember a couple of years ago, when some Mets diehard tried to get into an internet blowout with me on here because I laughed at the idea that the Indians would trade Lindor for Nimmo straight up.

I think it was the same time that people tried to shit on me for arguing that Brian McCann was worth $16m a year more than Chris Stewart.

Oh, FanGraphs.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  Metsox

There’s literally no other prospect being completely ignored by top 100 lists that is putting up the elite performance (considering all of topline and underlying numbers, and age and level) that Rowdy is.

The lack of ink being spilled on Rowdy is more amazing, tbh.

Spudchukar
9 years ago

Little rough on the Cards’ prospects. Austin Gomber, Eliezer Alvarez, Harrison Bader, and Magneuris Sierra ought to get some consideration.

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  Spudchukar

Why?

Graves
9 years ago
Reply to  victorvran

Because they are on his favorite team! Duh

kldub4life
9 years ago

If Mitch Keller is healthy where do you see him potentially jumping to next year on this list?

merlin401
9 years ago

Is there a reason that 65 grades skills are not ever an option? 65 FV is used, but in the individual skill breakdowns its either 60 or 70 with no in between.

brianknolly
9 years ago

Great work, but when will the AL west prospects be complete? Mariners fans need ours!