2018 MLB Mock Draft v 1.0

With the event itself still over a month and a half away, it’s still too early to say with any type of certainty which clubs will select which players in June’s draft. That said, we’ve become familiar enough with industry consensus and player buzz in recent weeks to take a stab at projecting the first 10 picks.

As mentioned yesterday in our updated draft rankings, signability is everything in a hard-capped draft, and most prospects haven’t even met with their advisors yet to set a number, though there have been indications in many cases.

The depth of the class is found in high-school talent in the 20-50 overall range. With the top of the draft unsettled — and with a couple teams featuring lots of extra picks and pool money (draft order) — there will likely be a pick or two among the top 15 signed for well below slot to set up some overslot bonuses at later picks. With the specific dope on every pick getting spottier around the 10th pick, we cut things off there, but there’s plenty of buzz on that 20-50 range as clubs line up contingency options should the board blow up for their first pick.

1. Detroit Tigers – Casey Mize, RHP, Auburn

All of our intel suggests that Mize will be the pick here, provided he doesn’t get hurt and his medical comes back fine. It’s not a 100% slam dunk, but that scenario seems well over 50% likely. In the event things go sideways with Mize, Wisconsin prep CF Jarred Kelenic is the second option and would be signable for a lower bonus, but the weather and competition he’s facing this spring has made him tougher to scout than some other similarly ranked prospects. Wichita State 3B Alec Bohm is another player who has been mentioned here, but he seems like a longshot at this point.

2. San Francisco Giants – Alec Bohm, 3B, Wichita State

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

This pick is a mystery to the industry, and it appears to be in part because the Giants have bigger problems than the draft right now. The club moved their chips into the middle of the table for the 2018 season but have just a 7-10 start to show for it and all three of Madison Bumgarner, Mark Melancon, and Jeff Samardzija on the DL. The Giants are casting a wide net, taking a long look at Arizona prep 3B Nolan Gorman, Florida prep RHP Carter Stewart, and Georgia Tech C Joey Bart, along with the players projected to go in this area. We’re told they will not take Oregon State 2B Nick Madrigal, but the expectation is they will go for a college player given what the organizational direction is at this point. Bohm makes the most sense given all these factors.

3. Philadelphia Phillies – Nick Madrigal, 2B, Oregon State

Multiple heavy hitters in the Phillies org have gone to see Bohm, Madrigal, and South Alabama CF Travis Swaggerty, according to sources, and this pick likely comes down to one of those players. Our best intel is that they club ranks those three as follows: Bohm, Madrigal, Swaggerty. Not every source agrees about that, though, and it’s unlikely the Phillies have made a call on it yet. Due to their spring-training home, the Phillies had GM Matt Klentak and multiple high-level scouts in to see South Florida LHP Shane McClanahan and Stetson RHP Logan Gilbert in March, but they don’t appear to be real options here.

4. Chicago White Sox – Travis Swaggerty, CF, South Alabama

The White Sox are also on all three of the top college bats (Bohm, Madrigal, Swaggerty), and it sounds like they’ll take the one who gets to them here. We’re also not sure how Chicago stacks up those bats, but there’s some belief that they have Madrigal tops amongst the three. McClanahan has been mentioned as an option here, but he’s faded the last few weeks.

5. Cincinnati Reds – Jarred Kelenic, CF, Waukesha West HS (WI)

The Reds appear to want one of the three aforementioned college hitters, and the buzz is they prefer Madrigal of the group, but it looks like all three will be gone for this pick. As for the Plan B, there’s some thought Cincinnati could go upside prep righty again with Stewart. After the club took Hunter Greene last year, though, we think they go in another direction. There’s some buzz Florida RHP Brady Singer is an option here for a below-slot bonus as a quick mover, but at this juncture and in this scenario, it looks like the decision will come down to Kelenic or Bart. Kelenic hasn’t been scouted much this spring due to a late start, a brief illness, and some inclement weather, but he’s a hot name whom some scouts think could break into the top four, possibly sliding one of the college bats back to this pick.

6. New York Mets – Matthew Liberatore, LHP, Mountain Ridge HS (AZ)

The Mets appear to be leaning college here and have been tied to Ole Miss LHP Ryan Rolison and Bart, who could move quick and help solve their big-league catching situation. Liberatore is the only prep player whom scouts think the Mets would entertain, and he’ll go quickly if the Mets don’t take him here. Liberatore has a huge matchup tonight against Gorman, another projected first-round pick, that should have one of the largest group of scouts of the year on hand.

7. San Diego Padres – Carter Stewart, RHP, Eau Gallie HS (FL)

The Padres, like all of the teams picking outside the top four, would like to get one of the college bats mentioned above, but that seems unlikely at this point. In true Padres fashion, we’ve heard them tied to a number of high-school players, with GM A.J. Preller seeing Stewart, Tennessee prep LHP Ryan Weathers (son of David Weathers), and Georgia prep RHP Ethan Hankins last week. The buzz is that the Padres really want Stewart at this pick but would also take Liberatore. If things blow up, Weathers may be their cut-rate option to save money and allocate it to other high-ceiling players at later picks. We have a list of player the Padres are believed to covet at later picks listed below. Just this morning, we heard Stewart was 86-94 mph last night and didn’t have feel for his breaking ball, with heat from the Phillies, Padres and Giants in the house, so his next few starts are worth monitoring more than usual to see how he bounces back.

8. Atlanta Braves – Kumar Rocker, RHP, North Oconee HS (GA)

Many are curious to see what sorts of players the Braves draft this year with a new general manager in place, but most of what we’ve heard is more of the same, with Atlanta focusing on high-ceiling prep players, mostly arms. Kelenic, Liberatore, and Rocker all fit here and have been scouted by Braves decision-makers in the past week. It’s worth noting that there are rumors Rocker would demand an overslot bonus, even at this pick, but he’d be expected to sign if taken this high. GM Alex Anthopoulos, like Klentak, was also seen around Florida during March observing local top prospects (college arms McClanahan, Gilbert, Singer, and Jackson Kowar, along with prep arms Stewart and RHP Mason Denaburg) with other team execs and advisors like Bobby Cox and Tom Glavine. That said, he hasn’t been spotted at an amateur game since leaving spring training, and all of those games were within two hours of Disney.

9. Oakland Athletics – Joey Bart, C, Georgia Tech

The A’s are believed to be leaning college here but also tend to look for value, taking the best available up top over a specific tendency. In this case, Bart was in play at picks No. 2, 5, and 6, and his floor appears to be the Pirates at the next pick, if Oakland were to pass. Bart also fits the timetable of the club Oakland is building as a potential quick mover at a premium position. In this scenario, Bart makes it to No. 9, but you could shuffle the players projected to picks Nos. 5 through 9 in a couple different ways that jive with what we’re hearing. One scout with whom we spoke yesterday said he doesn’t think Bart gets out of the top five.

10. Pittsburgh Pirates – Ryan Rolison, LHP, Ole Miss

The Pirates tend to emphasize size, velocity and mechanical markers on pitchers along with exit velocity for hitters. We’re told they would take Bart if he got to this pick while Oregon State RF Trevor Larnach and Kelenic also fit their type on the hitter side at this pick. McClanahan, Rolison, Rocker and California prep RHP Cole Winn fit their type on the pitching side. Rolison has three above average pitches from the left side and needs some slight mechanical tweaks, but he could be far better than 10th best in this class. Rolison, and college players in general fit better with the time table the Pirates set with their recent trades, but we wouldn’t expect them to force a college pick here. McClanahan, Winn and Larnach would all appear to be options here as well but you can probably tell why we cut this off at ten picks since the specific dope starts getting spottier around this juncture.

Other Notes

We have Rocker going eighth and Pittsburgh showing interest in him with the 10th pick. Toronto (12) is another distinct possibility as they’ve been showing a lot of interest in recent weeks. The Blue Jays are also rumored to be on Florida prep CF Connor Scott — as is Texas (15) among others clubs in the Nos. 10-20 range.

Seattle (14) and Washington (27) are both believed to be looking for quick-moving college types, with the Nationals tied to Stanford RHP Tristan Beck and Kentucky’s 6-foot-11 RHP Sean Hjelle. Seattle was on Denaburg before his injury, but his stock is a question mark until things clear up on that front.

We mentioned Singer representing a backup option for Cincinnati (5), and he’s being mentioned as a quick-moving option in the Nos. 9-15 range, especially if he can finish strong. Singer matches up with Mize next weekend, and Kiley will be there.

Houston (28) has been tied mostly to high-school players, many with good TrackMan profiles. Cleveland (29) and the Dodgers (30) seem to be looking at similar pools of players, too. Houston and Cleveland have been associated most often with Pennsylvania prep CF Mike Siani, while Illinois prep CF Alek Thomas is a target of the Dodgers and Indians. The Dodgers are believed to be on Georgia prep C Anthony Seigler, who fits their mold of athletic multi-positional catchers (Austin Barnes, Kyle Farmer, Will Smith, Connor Wong).

The Dodgers, Royals (18, 33, 34, 40), and Rays (31, 32) are on Georgia prep CF Parker Meadows (brother of Pirates LF Austin Meadows) whom we compared to Indians CF Bradley Zimmer yesterday in the top 55.

With all their extra picks, the Royals can be creative and bet on upside prep players. Along with Meadows, they are linked to Georgia prep RHP Cole Wilcox (the Reds at pick No. 47 are heavily on Wilcox, as well), who should be a tough sign. Kansas City is also among the teams taking long looks at North Carolina multi-sport prep star CF Jordyn Adams, the others including Minnesota (20, 59), San Diego (38), and Texas (15, 55). Adams’ signability is unclear right now, but the number will likely be well into the seven figures.

Along with Adams, the Padres are tied to New York prep RHP Lineras Torres, Jr. and New Jersey prep RF Nick Decker, along with later picks/underslot options Tennessee prep RF Ryder Green and Georgia prep RF Lawrence Butler.

The Marlins (53) are the team showing the most interest in Florida prep SS Blaze Alexander.





38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
tb.25
8 years ago

Quite a few pitchers high in the first round here. Do orgs not necessarily believe in the Cubs’ philosophy of going for bats (assuming lesser volatility and higher chance of success), or are the pitchers that much better than the bats on the top end of this draft?

Edit: Clearly each team has its own philosophy. Just was wondering if they too used similar stats as the Cubs did to decide to go for hitters early.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

You need to be able to afford pitching. The cubs approach is great but pitching is more expensive than hitting. Small market teams do need to take the risk because the alternative is to pay 200m to a 30 yo ace or buy a crap pitcher and hope works.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

Keep in mind, the argument that going for athletic college bats doesn’t mean that they are always the better pick. It just means that they’ve been undervalued. All else equal, you should go for the college bats first.

Worth noting that 3 of the top 4 players on Kiley and Eric’s board are college bats this year, but picks #5-#7 are pitchers, which is why you see them talking about a lot of them in the back half of the Top 10.

https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/updated-2018-mlb-draft-rankings/

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

I think the allure of a TOR arm for free is just too tantalizing. As much of a long-shot as it may be… Hitting can be addressed in many ways, but SP is really impossible to patch together. That being said, the Cubs do it right by targeting college bats.

craiglambert50
8 years ago

It’s really good to hear the Mariners aren’t limiting themselves to college players with their first pick, based on their interest in Denaburg. I feel like they would go for Singer or Gilbert at 14, and possibly Larnach I guess. Do you see those players as their most likely picks?

MHanny17
8 years ago

If the Mariners got Singer at #14, I would be absolutely thrilled

mrmariner1
8 years ago
Reply to  MHanny17

I’d be happy with Singer, McClanahan, Bart, Rolison, or Scott (probably in that order) at 14. I feel like one or two of them will be available. I have doubts about Larnach, since he is a fringe corner defender with power. Those guys aren’t too hard to find. On the other hand, I guess that could have been said about Conforto.

beckdawg
8 years ago

Would a team like the cubs(picks 24, 62, 77, and 78) be in a good position with the depth being as mentioned 20-50 for HS preps? Just sort of thinking they might catch a guy who falls with an overslot deal thanks to the additional slot money.

OddBall Herrera
8 years ago

Hey cool, has anyone of Indian (India Indian) descent ever been selected in a meaningful round of the draft? I know there were the two cricketers who went through the Pirates system, but they were international signings.

This seems like a first.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
8 years ago

On the top 55 from yesterday, you guys included age (in the wonderful year.day format instead of just year).

Is there a range for a high schooler where it starts to become “he’s old for his class”? Typically it’s 19, but wondering if guys like Jarred Kelenic (18.9), Xavier Edwards (18.8), and Mason Denaburg (18.8) would be considered old too?

BufordMember since 2016
8 years ago

With 1B Belt under contract through 2021 and 3B Longoria under control through 2022 at least, why would Bohm (a 3B or 1B) make significantly more sense than CF Travis Swaggerty ?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Buford

Probably because the Giants want to win again in 2022.

BufordMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Swaggerty can crack their lineup before 2022 because CF is currently a bigger hole than corner infielder thus making them better sooner.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  Buford

Drafting for present need is a fool’s errand in MLB

BufordMember since 2016
8 years ago

Not if you rate two players equally talented, then you can choose the one that fills a need.

mrmariner1
8 years ago
Reply to  Buford

True, if you think they are equally talented then go with Swaggerty, or whoever will sign for less. I feel like if SF prefers Bohm, then they will pick him unless Swaggerty signs for less and they can spend more later. Also, the Giants are going to be rebuilding soon, considering they are the 4th best team in the division (soon to be 5th with the up and coming Padres) and they seriously have no farm system. I’d be shocked if they don’t trade at least one of Belt/Longo before 2020.

cperd
8 years ago

The last few College OF the White Sox took in the first round turned out great! (not)

Anthony Princeton
8 years ago
Reply to  cperd

True, but it is a very small sample size and none in the top 10. I don’t even think any of the player development personnel are still there.

2009 Jared MItchell (1-23) LSU
2003 Brian Anderson (1-15) Arizona
2000 Joe Borchard (1-12) Stanford

MikeSMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  cperd

Don’t limit yourself to outfielders. Try to figure out who was the last position player drafted by the White Sox who had a 10 WAR career. That’s just five years of being an average big league starter. Last time I tried to do that, I couldn’t come up with anybody more recent than Aaron Rowand in 1998, although it is hard to track all the player movement so I may have missed one.

snood
8 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

BRef has Marcus Semien (2011 r6) over 8 WAR, so he could get there soon. Before that, Chris Young (2001 r16). https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?team_ID=CHW&year_ID=2001&draft_type=junreg&query_type=franch_year
ugly, ugly list of hitters though.

Dan B
8 years ago
Reply to  snood

Aaron Rowand wasn’t drafted in 1998… Oh wow. I am old.

DDMember since 2020
8 years ago

Madrigal is an interesting player, and I’d love the Phillies to take him. Watching him on video reminds me of a looser, less quick-twitch version of Scott Kingery.

Dooduh
8 years ago

McClanahan has dropped out of the top ten?? Hmmm.

Dooduh
8 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

I really don’t think the conservative Mets FO picks a prep arm. Not at 6. They picked McClanahan before. If he’s there, he’s prob their guy.

mrmariner1
8 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

He hasn’t pitched well lately, and he comes with more injury concerns than most college pitchers.

Dooduh
8 years ago
Reply to  mrmariner1

He’s 6th in their ranking they put out just yesterday.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
8 years ago

Shouldn’t the phillies go for a potential ace pitcher? They are already loaded with hitters, especially in the IF but also the OF.

Franco could be replaced and a catcher would. Help but they really need another good starter.

Sure draft should be BPA but if you go college you want quick moving players.

So far the klentak group hasn’t looked good drafting, both high pickes in moniak and haseley struggled their first year.

MikeSMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

In a sport that takes years to develop a player, where players change positions fairly regularly, and where you can often find multiple places to play a guy out of position, it almost never makes sense to pursue any strategy except “best player available.”

mrmariner1
8 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

“Sure draft should be BPA” You seem to be suggesting otherwise. If they have a need at catcher now, you don’t address it in the draft. You do it in free agency or trade, because why wait 3 years for an unproven talent?

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago

I really enjoy coming back to these projections in six months as it always ends up looking crazy. Not saying its not good work, because it is, but more that I enjoy seeing how different things turn out just a few months later. Thanks for doing this!

channelclemente
8 years ago

Rocker is getting a lot of interest in San Francisco.

Daniel
8 years ago

I don’t mind the Giants taking the best prep arm in this spot. They know how to develop those high-ceiling pitchers.

Daniel
8 years ago

Who are 2-3 prep hitters “with good TrackMan profiles” for Houston? (Presumably Siani, based on the post…who are some others?)

obsessivegiantscompulsive
8 years ago

Love mocks! However, judging the Giants by expectations is going to get people left standing in the dust. I’ve rarely seen anyone guess who the Giants would pick, other than Arroyo being mentioned as a player to keep an eye on, here on Fangraphs. By expectations, the Giants should have been drafting college pitchers in recent years, but they picked up Arroyo and Ramos, Jones and Gonzalez. They zip when the industry zags. But you have to pick somebody in a mock, so I get it.

My guess is that the Giants will pick up a pitcher. They tend to alternate, and since they got high school hitters last season, I would guess pitcher, and probably college, though if they love a HS like they did Bumgarner, then they’ll go that way.

obsessivegiantscompulsive
8 years ago

Reading the comments here just convinces me even more that people don’t get the Giants. Since Sabean took over in 1997, for true first round picks, out of 23 picks: 15 pitchers, 4 OF, 2 SS, 1 C, and 1 3B. So that’s why no 2B. Also, last 3B was in 1998, which was viewed as a huge mistake, and they have not tried since, and so I don’t see them getting a 3B either.

Giants have selected pitchers 15 of 23 times, overall in the first round, 4 out of 5 times with Top 10 picks (Posey being the other pick). Though only 4 out of 9 times since John Barr joined. Given that the Giants expertise is in finding pitching talent, and they have mostly selected pitching, I would be surprised if they don’t select a pitcher.

But when it’s the 2nd pick overall, I agree, Giants need to select BPA, no matter position. But there is no clear top picks, not like other seasons, so the clear #2 to you all probably don’t mess with what the Giants see. Again, since they have greater expertise with pitching, I would be surprised if they don’t select pitching. Not that I’m saying they will select a pitcher, just that I would not be surprised.

Basically, anybody who thinks they know what the Giants are going to select, don’t really get the Giants. They think their own way. Every mock I’ve seen in the past dozen or so seasons I’ve been following the live draft, has missed on who the Giants would select.

sgp2204
8 years ago

Wouldn’t be upset about drafting Swaggerty, but I’m REALLY hoping Bohm falls to the Sox at 4. Madrigal is number 2 on my list, so if the top 3 picks play out like this, I wouldn’t be too thrilled.

That being said, I wouldn’t be all that surprised to see them draft Bart at #4. They’re system is pretty weak at catcher, and their “top” guy, Collins, doesn’t have a strong defensive profile behind the plate and appears to have forgotten how to swing a baseball bat after getting drafted.