2020 SABR Analytics Awards: Voting Now Open!

Here’s your chance to vote for the 2020 SABR Analytics Conference Research Award winners.

The SABR Analytics Conference Research Awards will recognize baseball researchers who have completed the best work of original analysis or commentary during the preceding calendar year. Nominations were solicited by representatives from SABR, Baseball Prospectus, FanGraphs, The Hardball Times, and Beyond the Box Score.

To read any of the finalists, click on the link below. Scroll down to cast your vote.

Contemporary Baseball Analysis

Contemporary Baseball Commentary

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Historical Baseball Analysis/Commentary

Voting will be open through 11:59 p.m. MST on Monday, February 10, 2020. Details and criteria for each category can be found here. Only one work per author was considered as a finalist.

 

 

Create your own user feedback survey

Mobile or Safari users, click here to access the survey

 

Results will be announced and presented at the ninth annual SABR Analytics Conference, March 13-15, 2020, at the Renaissance Phoenix Downtown in Phoenix, Arizona. Learn more or register for the conference at SABR.org/analytics.





Meg is the editor-in-chief of FanGraphs and the co-host of Effectively Wild. Prior to joining FanGraphs, her work appeared at Baseball Prospectus, Lookout Landing, and Just A Bit Outside. You can follow her on Bluesky @megrowler.fangraphs.com.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Distortive Effects of Advertising
6 years ago

Help me out with the morality here. Is it okay to vote if I haven’t read all the articles?

Kyle Sharamitaro
6 years ago

You don’t have to vote until February 10.

tung_twista
6 years ago

That was one of the things bothering me. I want to vote, but I don’t want to have to read 15 articles before doing so.
But then, this is a sports where people voted Harold Baines into the HoF and a couple of writers left Verlander off a Cy Young ballot in 2016.
So vote.
Vote in good conscience knowing that whatever your vote is, it is far from the worst one.

Kyle Sharamitaro
6 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Of course you won’t b the WORST voter, but that’s quite the low standard to have for oneself.

I mean, It’s only 15 pieces. And I would hope you would, at the very least, peruse each of them. Check out the opening and closing paragraphs, look at the graphs and charts, etc. There’s a reason these got picked, so give each piece a couple minutes. There’s no downside.

Master Live 013Member since 2023
6 years ago

I may be misremembering but I thought a requisite for the nomination was that the article were available (freely) to the public. The one regarding “How Many Hits Did Ty Cobb” have is behind a paywall. That’s disappointing.

Dr. DaveMember since 2016
6 years ago

I missed the “Psychology of walks vs. singles” article the first time around. Reading it, I feel like I’m living in Bizarro World. I remember so clearly arguing endlessly (and futilely) against exactly the opposite prejudice, for most of my baseball life. Singles were active and manly and could lead to errors or miscues, be part of a hit-and-run, etc. Walks were passive and unmanly and clogged the bases. A .300 batting average (and .320 OBP) was greatly to be preferred over a .270 batting average (and .350 OBP). Besides, instead of taking all those pitches, players should be trying to do something to help the team. Leaving it to the next guy is cowardly and lazy.

What’s next? An article on how errors really are worse than simply failing to make a play?

Dewey24
6 years ago

“I got a fever, and there’s only one cure: More Melchior.”