2022 ZiPS Projections: Los Angeles Dodgers

After having typically appeared in the hallowed pages of Baseball Think Factory, Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS projections have now been released at FanGraphs for a decade. The exercise continues this offseason. Below are the projections for the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Batters

What can you say about the Dodgers? Most of the lineup from last year is returning, and most of that lineup is very, very good. That a 106-win season can feel slightly disappointing comes down to how the San Francisco Giants played rather than how the Dodgers did. The projected lineup ranges from average to MVP-worthy, with no apparent holes.

Thanks to the trade that brought Trea Turner to LA, the question of what to do at shortstop over the long haul was put off for another year. The Dodgers didn’t really seem to make any kind of a big push to bring back Corey Seager, but that’s a testament to just how awesome Turner is. There are only two shortstops in baseball I’d rather have on a long-term contract: Fernando Tatis Jr., and Wander Franco. Suffice it to say, the Dodgers do not — and will not — have access to either of those two young stars. Even in the worst-case scenario, though, a Turner departure after 2022 would result in the team temporarily having a Chris TaylorGavin Lux middle infield. That’s still likely a roughly average pair, not a major disaster.

There are still a few long-term questions to answer. Justin Turner is in the twilight of his career, and while ZiPS still has him as solidly average, a falloff isn’t impossible at his age. Max Muncy and AJ Pollock are both on the wrong side of 30, and the latter has quite a lengthy injury history. There are also genuine concerns about Cody Bellinger given his last couple of seasons. I have absolutely no idea what kind of player he really is right now; I wouldn’t be surprised by anything between Ken Griffey Jr. and Craig Griffey. In other words, the lineup is great, but it’s not perfect.

The Dodgers are pretty insulated by nasty surprises in 2022, however, which limits the worry about any of these things. Their stable of tertiary players is as deep as that from Arrested Development — I love me some Gene Parmesan and J. Walter Weatherman — and the minors have even more of them, with Andy Pages, Michael Busch, and Miguel Vargas all potential contributors. ZiPS is also quite intrigued by Eddys Leonard, a largely under-the-radar prospect who was terrific in A-ball at age 20.

The lineup will score a lot of runs and has a very high floor.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Pitchers

On paper, the rotation still looks excellent, though not as elite as it did entering last season. I do admit to a certain amount of uneasiness about the depth here, especially relative to that of the lineup. Few people doubt Walker Buehler and Julio Urías, but there are simply a lot of unanswered questions after that. ZiPS probably saw the same thing that the Dodgers saw in Andrew Heaney despite an awful season, but how convinced are we about Tony Gonsolin? Or David Price back in a full-time starting role? Or Dustin May’s healthy return? Trevor Bauer might end up back on the team and be a 4-WAR pitcher, but given the highly distressing allegations against him (and the potential resulting legal consequences), he also might not pitch for the Dodgers (or anyone else) ever again; the criminal justice results are obviously more critical to society, but the Dodgers do have some decisions to make.

Now, maybe the Dodgers will actively pick up starting pitching when the offseason resumes. But right now, I have concerns.

As for the bullpen, I have far fewer issues. The bullpen is varied and deep and will project as one of the best by ZiPS, even with Kenley Jansen likely gone. There’s something for everyone, from the bog-standard elite closer (Blake Treinen) to the hard thrower with upside (Brusdar Graterol) to a couple of solid lefties, and everything in between. If I’m not miscounting, ZiPS has the Dodgers currently employing 14 relievers with a projected ERA+ of 100 or better, with a couple other possibilities in repurposed starting pitchers.

With one start in two years, ZiPS still has love for Cole Hamels.

Ballpark graphic courtesy Eephus League. Depth charts constructed by way of those listed here.

Batters – Standard
Player B Age PO PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS
Trea Turner R 29 SS 639 588 101 177 32 4 28 84 43 113 32 6
Mookie Betts R 29 RF 601 515 107 147 31 3 27 75 73 90 17 5
Will Smith R 27 C 484 410 70 105 21 2 27 87 56 108 3 0
Max Muncy L 31 1B 539 450 85 111 21 2 32 99 79 129 3 1
Cody Bellinger L 26 CF 507 444 74 109 22 3 25 84 58 120 11 2
Justin Turner R 37 3B 530 466 70 123 19 0 19 73 47 87 3 0
Miguel Vargas R 22 3B 577 530 67 139 26 2 19 69 33 108 8 1
Gavin Lux L 24 SS 529 474 71 115 21 6 16 70 51 123 6 2
Chris Taylor R 31 CF 532 469 75 117 27 4 18 73 52 151 10 2
AJ Pollock R 34 LF 405 370 51 99 21 1 19 67 25 84 6 1
Luke Raley L 27 RF 387 348 48 82 12 2 18 56 21 112 6 1
Andy Pages R 21 CF 534 478 68 108 19 1 27 96 40 157 4 2
Sheldon Neuse R 27 2B 509 471 58 116 21 2 16 61 31 146 5 1
Zach McKinstry L 27 2B 402 366 45 86 17 3 14 55 29 101 5 5
Eddys Leonard R 21 SS 502 464 58 107 18 2 20 64 31 136 5 2
Brandon Lewis R 23 3B 452 420 48 91 14 1 24 74 25 142 2 1
Rangel Ravelo R 30 1B 319 287 39 74 14 1 10 43 25 57 0 1
Austin Barnes R 32 C 268 234 33 49 10 0 7 28 26 67 3 1
Andy Burns R 31 3B 347 310 39 70 12 1 11 38 32 82 7 3
Michael Busch L 24 2B 492 436 61 97 21 1 18 60 42 144 1 2
Tomás Telis B 31 1B 415 395 51 110 13 1 9 44 16 54 3 1
Elliot Soto R 32 SS 330 301 38 71 12 3 4 26 24 75 4 2
Tony Wolters L 30 C 316 278 35 61 10 1 4 32 26 69 1 2
Carson Taylor B 23 C 361 329 49 80 13 0 11 44 25 75 1 0
Matt Beaty L 29 LF 324 293 42 75 16 1 8 50 22 55 3 1
Jacob Amaya R 23 SS 509 465 58 100 19 2 12 52 35 114 4 1
Ryan Noda L 26 1B 467 404 55 80 17 1 19 66 50 162 4 1
Steven Souza Jr. R 33 RF 242 215 24 45 9 2 9 30 22 77 3 1
Tim Federowicz R 34 C 177 162 15 33 7 0 5 16 11 51 0 0
Clayton Daniel R 27 2B 229 210 25 48 8 1 3 19 16 42 1 2
Jason Martin L 26 LF 387 354 44 81 15 3 13 53 28 96 6 5
Justin Yurchak L 25 1B 385 346 50 87 15 1 9 41 29 87 1 1
James Outman L 25 CF 494 452 47 90 14 3 17 48 35 157 11 4
Kekai Rios R 25 C 148 135 15 26 5 0 3 12 10 44 1 0
Carlos Asuaje L 30 2B 281 253 33 58 10 2 4 26 22 48 3 1
Edwin Ríos L 28 1B 403 364 50 78 18 2 21 60 29 149 1 2
Hunter Feduccia L 25 C 319 288 37 64 12 1 8 34 26 76 1 1
Drew Avans L 26 LF 335 302 39 67 11 2 8 32 28 93 15 4
Andrew Toles R 30 LF 149 141 16 33 7 1 3 16 6 34 2 2
Albert Pujols R 42 1B 324 301 29 71 9 0 13 55 16 50 2 0
Leonel Valera R 22 SS 461 430 48 83 13 2 16 54 24 161 11 3
Omar Estévez R 24 2B 418 377 45 77 17 1 9 40 31 118 0 1
Kody Hoese R 24 3B 299 277 34 57 10 1 6 27 15 71 2 1
Aldrich De Jongh L 23 LF 232 219 23 44 8 1 7 22 11 75 3 1
Jeren Kendall L 26 CF 336 306 33 49 8 3 12 37 26 148 12 6
Devin Mann R 25 1B 439 391 51 84 18 1 13 51 33 119 3 3
Hamlet Marte R 28 C 210 192 19 34 6 1 5 19 14 78 1 1
Deacon Liput L 26 2B 370 345 33 64 9 2 11 36 21 137 7 3

Batters – Advanced
Player BA OBP SLG OPS+ ISO BABIP RC/27 Def WAR No. 1 Comp
Trea Turner .301 .352 .512 129 .211 .333 7.4 -1 5.5 Barry Larkin
Mookie Betts .285 .378 .515 138 .229 .302 7.5 9 5.3 Bob Elliott
Will Smith .256 .355 .515 131 .259 .284 6.7 2 4.3 Darrell Porter
Max Muncy .247 .367 .516 135 .269 .273 6.8 1 3.6 Mike Epstein
Cody Bellinger .245 .333 .477 115 .232 .281 5.9 2 3.1 Gary Geiger
Justin Turner .264 .343 .427 107 .163 .289 5.5 -3 2.3 Mike Lowell
Miguel Vargas .262 .309 .426 96 .164 .298 4.9 3 2.2 Willy Aybar
Gavin Lux .243 .318 .414 95 .171 .296 4.7 -1 2.0 Rance Mulliniks
Chris Taylor .249 .330 .439 105 .190 .330 5.3 -6 1.9 Claudell Washington
AJ Pollock .268 .321 .484 113 .216 .300 5.8 0 1.7 Glenallen Hill
Luke Raley .236 .306 .437 97 .201 .294 4.8 7 1.6 Bubba Carpenter
Andy Pages .226 .299 .439 96 .213 .276 4.6 -4 1.4 Matt Holliday
Sheldon Neuse .246 .294 .401 85 .155 .324 4.3 1 1.2 Juan Melo
Zach McKinstry .235 .297 .413 89 .178 .287 4.2 0 0.9 Boi Rodriguez
Eddys Leonard .231 .287 .407 85 .177 .282 4.1 -5 0.8 Tommy Whiteman
Brandon Lewis .217 .266 .426 83 .210 .264 3.9 2 0.8 Jose Valdez
Rangel Ravelo .258 .326 .418 99 .160 .291 4.9 1 0.7 Ruben Amaro
Austin Barnes .209 .301 .342 73 .132 .263 3.6 3 0.7 Erik Pappas
Andy Burns .226 .301 .377 82 .152 .272 4.0 0 0.6 Steve Lombardozzi
Michael Busch .222 .301 .399 87 .177 .288 4.1 -6 0.5 Dave Baker
Tomás Telis .278 .309 .385 86 .106 .304 4.5 4 0.5 Aaron Miles
Elliot Soto .236 .298 .336 71 .100 .302 3.5 1 0.5 Tony Taylor
Tony Wolters .219 .299 .306 64 .086 .278 3.1 3 0.4 Doug Newstrom
Carson Taylor .243 .296 .383 82 .140 .284 4.1 -5 0.4 Eric Christopherson
Matt Beaty .256 .327 .399 95 .143 .291 4.8 -5 0.2 Derrick May
Jacob Amaya .215 .271 .342 64 .127 .260 3.2 2 0.2 Trevor Plouffe
Ryan Noda .198 .295 .386 82 .188 .274 3.9 2 0.2 Chris Weinke
Steven Souza Jr. .209 .290 .395 83 .186 .279 4.0 1 0.1 Jeff Guiel
Tim Federowicz .204 .257 .340 59 .136 .264 3.0 2 0.1 George Mitterwald
Clayton Daniel .229 .285 .319 63 .090 .273 3.0 3 0.1 Erik Laseke
Jason Martin .229 .286 .398 82 .169 .278 3.9 2 0.1 Phil Dauphin
Justin Yurchak .251 .310 .379 85 .127 .312 4.2 -1 0.0 Francisco Melendez
James Outman .199 .265 .356 66 .157 .263 3.3 1 0.0 Choo Freeman
Kekai Rios .193 .252 .296 48 .104 .261 2.6 2 -0.1 J.C. Boscan
Carlos Asuaje .229 .296 .332 70 .103 .269 3.5 -2 -0.1 Kelvin Chapman
Edwin Ríos .214 .280 .448 92 .234 .294 4.2 -5 -0.2 Oreste Marrero
Hunter Feduccia .222 .287 .354 72 .132 .275 3.5 -6 -0.2 Scott Hatteberg
Drew Avans .222 .290 .351 72 .129 .294 3.8 -1 -0.2 Mark Budzinski
Andrew Toles .234 .268 .362 68 .128 .288 3.3 0 -0.3 Shawn Garrett
Albert Pujols .236 .281 .395 80 .159 .244 4.0 -2 -0.4 Harmon Killebrew
Leonel Valera .193 .243 .344 56 .151 .265 2.9 -2 -0.6 J.J. Furmaniak
Omar Estévez .204 .265 .326 59 .122 .272 2.9 -1 -0.7 John Hattig
Kody Hoese .206 .249 .314 51 .108 .255 2.7 0 -0.7 Mark Farris
Aldrich De Jongh .201 .241 .342 55 .142 .270 2.8 0 -0.8 Brian Martin
Jeren Kendall .160 .229 .324 47 .163 .253 2.4 1 -0.9 Stephen Chapman
Devin Mann .215 .284 .366 74 .151 .274 3.5 -4 -0.9 Cliff Brumbaugh
Hamlet Marte .177 .234 .297 42 .120 .266 2.2 -5 -1.1 Francisco Morales
Deacon Liput .186 .236 .319 48 .133 .269 2.5 -2 -1.2 Matt Guiliano

Pitchers – Standard
Player T Age W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO FIP
Walker Buehler R 27 12 6 3.23 32 32 189.3 153 68 23 46 205 3.42
Julio Urías L 25 13 7 3.29 32 29 167.0 143 61 20 37 172 3.45
Trevor Bauer R 31 10 6 3.37 22 22 136.0 106 51 18 46 164 3.68
Clayton Kershaw L 34 11 6 3.38 23 23 130.3 111 49 20 27 146 3.60
Cole Hamels L 38 8 6 4.22 27 27 140.7 137 66 24 52 137 4.75
Andrew Heaney L 31 9 7 4.22 27 22 128.0 121 60 24 33 145 4.27
Blake Treinen R 34 7 3 3.14 64 0 63.0 50 22 5 23 72 3.12
David Price L 36 5 4 4.00 29 14 83.3 81 37 13 25 81 4.31
Dustin May R 24 4 3 4.03 16 14 73.7 71 33 10 21 68 4.08
Danny Duffy L 33 6 5 4.32 18 17 91.7 84 44 16 33 99 4.47
Kenley Jansen R 34 5 3 3.28 63 0 60.3 45 22 9 21 83 3.56
Caleb Ferguson L 25 4 2 3.68 58 4 66.0 53 27 9 29 89 3.85
Aaron Wilkerson R 33 6 5 4.55 21 17 91.0 91 46 16 28 85 4.65
Mitch White R 27 5 4 4.38 30 15 88.3 84 43 14 30 87 4.43
Tommy Kahnle R 32 3 2 3.58 64 0 55.3 43 22 9 20 79 3.63
Bobby Miller R 23 2 2 4.11 18 15 57.0 57 26 7 16 47 4.13
Brusdar Graterol R 23 5 2 3.31 53 0 51.7 47 19 4 15 47 3.59
Tony Gonsolin R 28 4 3 4.56 20 18 75.0 68 38 14 33 79 4.90
Andre Jackson R 26 5 5 4.81 25 21 101.0 98 54 15 49 94 4.85
Justin Bruihl L 25 3 2 3.66 44 3 51.7 47 21 6 16 50 3.86
Joe Kelly R 34 2 1 3.27 50 1 44.0 36 16 3 20 51 3.32
Victor González L 26 3 2 4.13 33 7 56.7 55 26 7 22 50 4.40
Clayton Beeter R 23 4 3 4.39 31 30 53.3 50 26 8 22 55 4.47
Ryan Pepiot R 24 7 7 4.92 27 23 100.7 98 55 19 43 101 5.06
Landon Knack R 24 5 4 4.57 17 12 61.0 60 31 9 24 56 4.59
Jimmy Nelson R 33 3 2 3.95 24 4 43.3 34 19 5 25 56 4.10
Darien Núñez L 29 4 3 3.86 34 2 49.0 40 21 7 22 64 3.89
Daniel Hudson R 35 5 3 3.93 54 0 52.7 44 23 8 20 64 3.98
Yefry Ramírez R 28 5 5 5.10 27 20 107.7 108 61 18 49 99 5.07
Alex Vesia L 26 3 2 4.04 46 0 49.0 38 22 8 25 67 4.28
Nick Robertson R 23 3 2 4.23 39 1 55.3 56 26 7 17 46 4.25
Evan Phillips R 27 3 2 4.24 38 1 51.0 46 24 8 24 61 4.47
Phil Bickford R 26 4 3 4.11 54 0 50.3 43 23 8 19 56 4.33
Andrew Vasquez L 28 2 2 4.17 40 0 49.7 42 23 7 28 63 4.35
Justin Hagenman R 25 6 5 4.50 38 2 64.0 65 32 10 20 55 4.57
Nick Tropeano R 31 3 3 5.07 21 11 65.7 68 37 12 27 58 5.16
John Rooney L 25 3 4 5.20 13 11 55.3 56 32 10 29 48 5.58
Guillermo Zuniga R 23 5 4 4.46 28 1 40.3 38 20 6 18 42 4.52
Austin Drury L 24 4 4 4.76 33 3 68.0 70 36 10 27 54 4.83
Neftalí Feliz R 34 3 3 4.50 38 1 40.0 37 20 7 17 46 4.58
Scott Alexander L 32 2 1 4.34 35 0 29.0 29 14 4 12 23 4.73
Marshall Kasowski R 27 2 2 4.67 25 2 27.0 24 14 4 18 30 4.99
Zach McAllister R 34 1 1 4.57 19 1 21.7 22 11 3 6 19 4.20
Aaron Ochsenbein R 26 3 2 4.64 37 1 52.3 52 27 9 20 50 4.82
Garrett Cleavinger L 28 3 3 4.63 33 1 35.0 29 18 5 23 42 4.78
Shane Greene R 33 1 1 4.58 43 0 39.3 37 20 7 14 39 4.81
Jimmie Sherfy R 30 3 2 4.58 36 0 37.3 34 19 6 16 41 4.52
Kevin Quackenbush R 33 4 3 4.60 46 0 45.0 44 23 8 16 47 4.60
Jon Duplantier R 27 2 3 5.55 17 12 48.7 50 30 10 28 46 5.93
Andrew Schwaab R 29 4 3 4.70 43 0 59.3 57 31 8 30 56 4.71
Mike Kickham L 33 2 3 5.46 23 9 57.7 63 35 13 23 48 5.80
Parker Curry R 28 5 5 5.44 27 12 91.0 100 55 21 26 76 5.53
Nate Jones R 36 1 1 5.12 21 0 19.3 20 11 4 9 20 5.51
Yadier Álvarez R 26 1 1 5.87 13 7 30.7 29 20 6 23 33 5.92
Cameron Gibbens R 26 3 3 4.87 37 0 48.0 45 26 8 27 51 5.10
Bobby Wahl R 30 1 1 5.32 26 0 23.7 23 14 4 13 25 5.04
Max Gamboa R 26 4 5 5.49 28 7 59.0 55 36 9 45 64 5.49
Gus Varland R 25 2 3 6.12 14 13 32.3 37 22 7 14 20 6.24
Yaisel Sierra R 31 0 0 5.59 21 0 19.3 21 12 4 8 15 5.71
Michael Grove R 25 2 3 5.76 23 21 75.0 79 48 16 37 70 5.73
Austin Bibens-Dirkx R 37 6 7 5.71 20 14 88.3 104 56 20 24 61 5.73
Mark Washington R 26 3 3 5.17 34 1 54.0 55 31 9 27 46 5.31
James Pazos L 31 3 3 5.22 50 1 50.0 50 29 10 24 48 5.42
Edward Cuello R 23 1 1 5.65 24 2 36.7 41 23 7 14 25 5.61
Logan Salow L 27 2 2 5.17 40 0 47.0 43 27 7 32 49 5.20
Carson Fulmer R 28 3 4 5.32 52 4 69.3 68 41 13 39 71 5.52
Ryan Moseley R 27 4 4 5.22 43 1 60.3 63 35 8 35 45 5.35
Jordan Martinson L 25 3 3 5.71 28 1 41.0 45 26 8 21 31 5.96
Cyrillo Watson R 24 3 3 5.59 37 1 46.7 49 29 8 26 38 5.58
Zack Plunkett R 26 2 3 5.52 30 0 44.0 46 27 8 22 37 5.57
Beau Burrows R 25 5 6 5.97 27 12 75.3 84 50 18 35 65 6.07
Melvin Jimenez R 22 3 4 6.04 37 0 50.7 55 34 12 25 44 6.18

Pitchers – Advanced
Player K/9 BB/9 HR/9 BB% K% BABIP ERA+ ERA- WAR No. 1 Comp
Walker Buehler 9.7 2.2 1.1 6.0% 26.9% .270 133 75 4.6 Dave Stieb
Julio Urías 9.3 2.0 1.1 5.5% 25.4% .279 131 76 3.9 Mark Mulder
Trevor Bauer 10.9 3.0 1.2 8.2% 29.3% .272 127 79 3.1 Roger Clemens
Clayton Kershaw 10.1 1.9 1.4 5.2% 27.9% .277 127 79 3.0 Andy Pettitte
Cole Hamels 8.8 3.3 1.5 8.5% 22.5% .291 102 98 1.9 Al Leiter
Andrew Heaney 10.2 2.3 1.7 6.2% 27.1% .296 102 98 1.7 Sterling Hitchcock
Blake Treinen 10.3 3.3 0.7 8.8% 27.7% .285 137 73 1.2 Roberto Hernandez
David Price 8.7 2.7 1.4 7.1% 22.9% .294 108 93 1.2 Craig Lefferts
Dustin May 8.3 2.6 1.2 6.8% 21.9% .292 107 94 1.2 Paul Dean
Danny Duffy 9.7 3.2 1.6 8.5% 25.4% .286 100 100 1.1 Ted Lilly
Kenley Jansen 12.4 3.1 1.3 8.5% 33.6% .275 131 76 1.1 Troy Percival
Caleb Ferguson 12.1 4.0 1.2 10.3% 31.6% .295 117 86 1.0 Randy Myers
Aaron Wilkerson 8.4 2.8 1.6 7.2% 21.8% .292 95 106 0.9 Travis Smith
Mitch White 8.9 3.1 1.4 8.0% 23.1% .289 98 102 0.9 Scott Bankhead
Tommy Kahnle 12.8 3.3 1.5 8.8% 34.6% .288 120 83 0.9 Skip Lockwood
Bobby Miller 7.4 2.5 1.1 6.6% 19.3% .294 105 95 0.9 John Hope
Brusdar Graterol 8.2 2.6 0.7 6.8% 21.5% .293 130 77 0.8 Cla Meredith
Tony Gonsolin 9.5 4.0 1.7 10.2% 24.5% .277 94 106 0.7 Tony Armas
Andre Jackson 8.4 4.4 1.3 10.9% 21.0% .291 89 112 0.7 J.D. Durbin
Justin Bruihl 8.7 2.8 1.0 7.4% 23.0% .289 118 85 0.7 Steve Howe
Joe Kelly 10.4 4.1 0.6 10.6% 27.1% .297 131 76 0.7 Jeff Nelson
Victor González 7.9 3.5 1.1 8.9% 20.2% .293 104 96 0.6 Ed Olwine
Clayton Beeter 9.3 3.7 1.4 9.5% 23.8% .294 98 102 0.6 Tim Leary
Ryan Pepiot 9.0 3.8 1.7 9.8% 22.9% .289 87 114 0.6 Jimmy Journell
Landon Knack 8.3 3.5 1.3 9.0% 21.1% .293 94 106 0.6 Tom Mastny
Jimmy Nelson 11.6 5.2 1.0 13.2% 29.5% .290 109 92 0.5 Tim Stoddard
Darien Núñez 11.8 4.0 1.3 10.6% 30.8% .292 111 90 0.5 Will Ohman
Daniel Hudson 10.9 3.4 1.4 9.0% 29.0% .283 109 91 0.4 Jose DeLeon
Yefry Ramírez 8.3 4.1 1.5 10.2% 20.7% .294 84 119 0.4 Freddie Toliver
Alex Vesia 12.3 4.6 1.5 11.9% 31.9% .280 106 94 0.3 Neal Cotts
Nick Robertson 7.5 2.8 1.1 7.1% 19.3% .297 102 98 0.3 Brian Barber
Evan Phillips 10.8 4.2 1.4 10.7% 27.2% .299 102 99 0.3 Tom Henke
Phil Bickford 10.0 3.4 1.4 8.9% 26.3% .276 105 96 0.3 Todd Jones
Andrew Vasquez 11.4 5.1 1.3 12.8% 28.8% .297 103 97 0.2 Brian Fuentes
Justin Hagenman 7.7 2.8 1.4 7.3% 20.0% .294 96 105 0.2 Jerry Spradlin
Nick Tropeano 7.9 3.7 1.6 9.3% 20.0% .295 85 118 0.2 Neil Allen
John Rooney 7.8 4.7 1.6 11.6% 19.1% .288 83 121 0.2 Jeff Tabaka
Guillermo Zuniga 9.4 4.0 1.3 10.2% 23.9% .296 96 104 0.1 Kirk Bullinger
Austin Drury 7.1 3.6 1.3 9.0% 18.1% .293 90 111 0.1 Tanyon Sturtze
Neftalí Feliz 10.4 3.8 1.6 9.8% 26.6% .297 96 105 0.1 Ricky Bottalico
Scott Alexander 7.1 3.7 1.2 9.4% 18.1% .287 99 101 0.1 Don Hood
Marshall Kasowski 10.0 6.0 1.3 14.8% 24.6% .290 92 109 0.1 Scott Gentile
Zach McAllister 7.9 2.5 1.2 6.5% 20.7% .302 94 106 0.1 Eric Gunderson
Aaron Ochsenbein 8.6 3.4 1.5 8.8% 21.9% .295 93 108 0.0 Derek Hasselhoff
Garrett Cleavinger 10.8 5.9 1.3 14.6% 26.8% .282 93 108 0.0 Ron Villone
Shane Greene 8.9 3.2 1.6 8.3% 23.1% .283 94 106 0.0 Matt Karchner
Jimmie Sherfy 9.9 3.9 1.4 9.9% 25.3% .289 94 107 0.0 Tyler Yates
Kevin Quackenbush 9.4 3.2 1.6 8.2% 24.2% .298 93 107 0.0 Tyler Walker
Jon Duplantier 8.5 5.2 1.8 12.4% 20.4% .292 77 129 -0.1 Dennis Sarfate
Andrew Schwaab 8.5 4.6 1.2 11.4% 21.2% .293 91 109 -0.1 Roy Smith
Mike Kickham 7.5 3.6 2.0 8.9% 18.6% .292 79 127 -0.1 Jason Jacome
Parker Curry 7.5 2.6 2.1 6.5% 19.1% .294 79 127 -0.1 Ryan Hawblitzel
Nate Jones 9.3 4.2 1.9 10.2% 22.7% .302 84 119 -0.1 Mike Fetters
Yadier Álvarez 9.7 6.8 1.8 16.1% 23.1% .288 73 137 -0.2 Jose Diaz
Cameron Gibbens 9.6 5.1 1.5 12.5% 23.6% .291 88 113 -0.2 Santiago Ramirez
Bobby Wahl 9.5 4.9 1.5 12.3% 23.6% .302 81 124 -0.2 Dwight Bernard
Max Gamboa 9.8 6.9 1.4 16.2% 23.1% .297 78 128 -0.2 Leslie Brea
Gus Varland 5.6 3.9 1.9 9.5% 13.6% .288 70 142 -0.2 Bobby Munoz
Yaisel Sierra 7.0 3.7 1.9 9.2% 17.2% .288 77 130 -0.2 Junior Walsh
Michael Grove 8.4 4.4 1.9 10.9% 20.6% .296 75 134 -0.2 Frank Wills
Austin Bibens-Dirkx 6.2 2.4 2.0 6.1% 15.6% .299 75 133 -0.3 Dennis Springer
Mark Washington 7.7 4.5 1.5 11.1% 18.9% .291 83 120 -0.3 Sean Green
James Pazos 8.6 4.3 1.8 10.8% 21.5% .288 82 121 -0.3 Matt Perisho
Edward Cuello 6.1 3.4 1.7 8.5% 15.2% .293 76 131 -0.3 Jim Adamczak
Logan Salow 9.4 6.1 1.3 14.9% 22.8% .288 83 120 -0.3 Thomas Hart
Carson Fulmer 9.2 5.1 1.7 12.3% 22.5% .294 81 124 -0.3 Courtney Duncan
Ryan Moseley 6.7 5.2 1.2 12.6% 16.2% .296 82 121 -0.4 Jake Robbins
Jordan Martinson 6.8 4.6 1.8 11.1% 16.4% .294 75 133 -0.5 Ramon Tatis
Cyrillo Watson 7.3 5.0 1.5 12.1% 17.8% .293 77 130 -0.5 Mark Zamarripa
Zack Plunkett 7.6 4.5 1.6 11.0% 18.5% .292 78 128 -0.5 Kevin Cameron
Beau Burrows 7.8 4.2 2.2 10.2% 19.0% .297 72 139 -0.5 Eddie Bonine
Melvin Jimenez 7.8 4.4 2.1 10.8% 19.0% .293 71 140 -0.9 Tracy Thorpe

Players are listed with their most recent teams wherever possible. This includes players who are unsigned, players who will miss 2022 due to injury, and players who were released in 2021. So yes, if you see Joe Schmoe, who quit baseball back in August to form a big band orchestra that only plays nu-metal versions of baroque cantatas, he’s still listed here intentionally. ZiPS is assuming a league with an ERA of 4.36, similar to the post-June substance-enforcement environment.

Both hitters and pitchers are ranked by projected zWAR, which is to say, WAR values as calculated by me, Dan Szymborski, whose surname is spelled with a z. WAR values might differ slightly from those that appear in the full release of ZiPS. Finally, I will advise anyone against — and might karate chop anyone guilty of — merely adding up WAR totals on a depth chart to produce projected team WAR. ZiPS is assuming that the designated hitter will continue in force in 2022.

ZiPS is agnostic about future playing time by design. For more information about ZiPS, please refer to this article, or get angry at Dan on Twitter.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

55 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
4 years ago

It’s hard to imagine not penciling in 3 WAR from Kershaw once the lockout ends. Then we find out what happens with the Freeman, inevitable As fire sale, Muncy’s prognosis; regardless, I’m curious to see how the Dodgers and Giants plan for ’22 and beyond (and whether I continue to camp in the cold, harsh terrain on Gavin Lux Hill–talk me down, please!)

jamesdakrnMember since 2020
4 years ago

I’m still on Lux Island and I’m holding onto it w diamond hands.

He’s shown flashes of his potential last tear towards the end, but for all intents and purposes 2022 is a very important season for him in terms of his future w the Dodgers

Brian ReinhartMember since 2016
4 years ago

Ahhhhhhh! Gene!! You got me again!!

Cave Dameron
4 years ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

Isn’t Dan the best?

joe_schlabotnik
4 years ago

dan’s write up didn’t mention mookie. the team is so deep that sometimes i forget hes on the team!

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago

The Trevor Bauer/Roger Clemens comp sadly works both on & off the field.

David Klein
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Not at all, Clemens is a steroid guy while Bauer has been accused of sexual assault so a very bad comp.

shortstoppin_Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Clemens has been accused of a few more things…

David Klein
4 years ago
Reply to  shortstoppin_

You are right totally forgot about his alleged affair with a then 15 year old country star.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

This is the first time in a while this team looks mortal. They’re still probably the best team in MLB by the projections, but with the Astros losing Correa and the Dodgers losing Seager (and potentially Kershaw and Bauer) I don’t think there are any true superteams left. There are probably about 6-8 teams that all look like they’re excellent without any single one being an overwhelming favorite.

This rotation would look radically different with a healthy Kershaw in it. Going into the season with Gonsolin / Heaney as the 3rd / 4th starter is a little iffy, but moving everyone back one gives you a top notch rotation. Of course, since we don’t know if Kershaw is healthy, or if he’ll be back, that could happen. Or not.

The other thing that’s interesting is that for years the Dodgers have been trying to find right-handed batters to complement Bellinger and Seager (and later Muncy). But now Seager is gone and Bellinger has been a bit of a mess physically. So now they’ve got a lineup loaded with dangerous right handed batters including Betts, both Turners, and Will Smith. It’s not really a weakness, because they’ve got a ton of decent left-handed types if they want to platoon and Bellinger might hit again, plus Muncy. But it is interesting how this changed.

Make WAR Not LoveMember since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Is this a sign that teams are exploiting the inefficiencies that were created when too many teams were trying to tank or rebuild, while the more competitive teams were all trying to be super teams? It feels like more teams are aiming for 86 to 90 wins than in the past. Either that or maybe baseball is becoming a more efficient market place and it’s getting harder for teams to be that much better than everyone else.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

IMO, I think it means that the Astros and Dodgers and Yankees (and slightly earlier super teams like the Red Sox and Cubs, and aspirational super teams like the Padres) are bumping up against an owner unwillingness to keep the teams they assembled together. It was wild that there were so many super-teams assembled in such a short period of time, and the players all got expensive at roughly the same time. Teams are willing to exceed the luxury tax for a season or two at a time, but most are not willing to do so indefinitely*. Lots of teams hit the same points in the same cycle around the same time.

*Dodgers and Mets may be an exception to this, but maybe not

Make WAR Not LoveMember since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The aging curve is also getting steeper. It might not be as good to keep all the same players, especially if teams are less willing to spend. Teams are increasingly falling in love with player development to keep costs low too. Plus, there’s more flexibility with players that can just be cut and are underpaid anyway. Some changes in the CBA could fix a lot of that.

mikejuntMember
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Dodgers have clearly been willing to spend to keep it together but they’ve also been so good and deep that it’s not really realistic to retain every single player. In particular, trading for and extending Betts right away took a chunk.

Teams can spend more money than they do but keeping the Dodgers band together would probably cost like 500 or 600m per season, even if they could spend that much profitably it would be so out of alignment with the rest of teams that the league would end up changing the rules.

You’ve also seen guys leave specifically because they wanted situations that offered the potential to play every day. Joc Pederson said that directly, and it’s also why Kenta Maeda requested a trade, and part of why Enrique Hernandez left.

hypg10
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I could swear I’ve seen you say this for the last 3 seasons. Dodgers are pretty loaded as is. They are a lock to add one more starter and could potentially add another bat. If there is any superteam left, it’s the Dodgers. Wouldn’t bet under 100 wins for this team

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  hypg10

I just checked. I said that before 2019, which was the year that Bellinger went nova and Ryu managed to turn in a full season. So, yeah, I was wrong about that. Didn’t say in 2020 or 2021, which would make sense, since trading for Mookie Betts and then signing Trevor Bauer definitely would put them back on the superteam map.

They do have a weapon a lot of other teams don’t have that will help them once the lockout is up and at the deadline–they can take on a lot of salary. So it’s quite possible the projection will be better before the season starts, mostly if they get another 3-win starter. And it’s possible they’ll outperform their record if the get the green light to address holes. In terms of the projection? I sincerely doubt the team analyzed here would be projected for 100 wins.

jamesdakrnMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

One key difference that merits the “Dodgers look mortal” take for 2021 is also the state pf the farm. Some interesting guys but not what it was in 2019 with the meteoric rise of Lux at the time and Dustin May, Smith, Verdugo, and with Gray/Downs also rising rapidly then.

Right now the Dodgers farm has some interesting pieces like Busch, Pages, Vargas, Cartaya, Miller and Pepiot but not many of these guys are mlb ready or have the ceiling of the prospects in 2019

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  jamesdakrn

I think that’s a slightly different issue. But the loss of May really stings. If May was healthy, I’d be thinking twice about saying the Dodgers look mortal.

jamesdakrnMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I mean basically all of those guys in 2019 contributed to the MLB team, especially Smith, Verdugo, Gonsolin and May

Smith 130 wRC+ and 1.6 fWAR in 54 games

Verdugo 112 wRC+ and 2.1 fWAR in 106 games

Lux 86 WRC+ and 0.2 FWAR so forgettable here relatively speaking

Beaty also had a 101 wRC+ and 0.9 fWAR in 99 games

Rios .277/.393/.617 and 0.4 fWAR in only 28 games

May 3.63 ERA/2.90 FIP and 1.0 fWAR in 34.2 IP

Gonsolin 2.93 ERA/3.86 FIP and 0.7 fWAR in 40 IP

They got 7.0 fWAR out of these guys, filling in the gaps when they had injuries from the regulars, and did really well

Not sure if you can expect Vargas, Busch, Cartaya, Miller and Pepiot to step in in 2022 and produce like that if they have injuries

We already saw some of the problems in the depth on the batters’ side last season – McKinstry, neuse, Peters et al were just horrid when the Dodgers had a slew of injuries early on and couldn’t fill the gaps.

In 2019 the Dodger rookies had something like 5 fWAR together

In 2021 the Dodger rookie hitters had like 0.3 fWAR if you only count the ones w/ positive numbers

jamesdakrnMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  jamesdakrn

Also: Jesus christ looking back at the rookies in 2019, the Dodgers 2016 Draft class was REALLY effin good

1st round Lux
1st round comp pick Smith
2nd round Mitch White
3rd round May
9th round Gonsolin

If Lux actually lives up to that potential this is one of hte best draft classes in recent memory

Mean Mr. Mustard
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m not convinced that the Dodgers situation is quite the same as the Astros. Losing Seager is a blow to the lineup, but they have a replacement and can allocate dollars elsewhere (pitching, shoring up), whereas the Astros have to either allocate dollars there or decide it’s going to be a deficit position. I see them taking the former path, given the options available this year versus the next several.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

The big loss is the rotation. The Dodgers went into last season with a rotation of Buehler, Bauer, Kershaw, Urias, and May, with Gonsolin and Price hanging out as depth. And this year Gonsolin and Price aren’t depth anymore.

The only reason to be down on the Dodgers lineup compared to last year is if Bellinger is broken. Otherwise it’s basically the same cast.

mattMember since 2023
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Well rhere are other reasons to be worried that dodgers lineup will regress some. Sure maybe JT continues to age like a robot, or he can regress both are very much still in play. And there is reason to worry about Muncy’s injury/taylor and/or pollock regressing.

Having the same core doesn’t mean they will repeat last year. You can count on mookie/trea/smith but i would quite easily take Houston’s lineup over them. It’ll still be a good to very good lineup but there are still real questions.

WARonEverything
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

yes, but what is the status of Muncy? that would make a difference for sure.

travis0548Member since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

they looked pretty mortal when the Braves kicked their asses in the NLCS

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  travis0548

Even if we wanted to put meaning into a 6 game sample size, the Dodgers outscored the Braves 27-26 in the NLCS

ChrisMember since 2020
4 years ago

LA will be just fine. Even as is, the offense is obviously potent. I think the Dodgers like having openings in the starting rotation — early and mid-season — so that they can provide some starts to Gonsolin, Heaney, Price (and later, May) as well as to the prospects like Jackson, Pepiot, Miller, etc., to see what they’ve got and/or develop as trade chips.

I also have zero doubt that Friedman will be able to address any holes as the trade deadline approaches, and he’ll still have a relatively deep farm system from which to pull off trades. The team has endless money, and Friedman has managed to convince other GMs to part with the likes of Betts, Scherzer, T. Turner, Darvish, Machado, etc., so he should have LA in good shape as the playoffs approach.

TheGrandslamwichMember since 2020
4 years ago

We may need to consult Bob Loblaw’s Law Blog on how the lockout affects the Dodgers.

jwalkn37
4 years ago

Rance “The Razor” Mulliniks!

Dmjn53
4 years ago

For lack of a better term, the Dodgers are inevitable

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago

Gosh I hated that the Nats traded Turner. but, maybe, just maybe we can sign him again in a year? I’m doubting it cause LAD has unlimited money. But,I refuse to give up hope.

Greg
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Also, Trae might not want to play for a 65 win team.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Greg

that’s not assured. If Corbin returns to be Corbin and Strassburg give us 30 starts, and some youngster makes a big step forward, we are a plus .500 team.

David Klein
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

I’ll believe Stras makes thirty starts again when I see it as besides for Merill Kelly who has come off of tos surgery and done much? Corbin may be cooked I am pretty confident they’re a last place team.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

You are probably right, but it’s still a non zero chance.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Plus FA is not quite over.

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

A whole lot of “ifs” there my friend, and none of them are particularly realistic. Good luck with that

pking2021
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

That’s just not realistic though

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  pking2021

I must say that minor league deal with Makial Franco does not fill me with more hope.

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

I mean he is on record saying he only wants to play on the East Coast, but then again Scherzer was on record saying he only wanted to play on the west coast, and we see how that turned out.

Mean Mr. Mustard
4 years ago

It’s really weird…my memories of Barry Larkin are injuries. Talented but *always* hurt.

I lost touch with baseball in the mid-90’s, reconnected in the early aughts, lost touch again in the mid-aughts, reconnected with the goings-on if not the games and he somehow had a Hall of Fame career. Those years when I wasn’t looking must have been injury-free and transcendent. Even OotP agrees; he keeps putting up 9 and 10 win seasons. Through about ’91, I never would have thought.

Anyway, all of that is to say that the Dodgers ought to feel pretty encouraged about their shortstop situation this year.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

He never really had one of those crazy 8 or 9 win seasons like Cal Ripken did, or Robin Yount did in ’82. But in his early years he was a fantastic defender and a good hitter, and in his middle career he was an average defender and a very good hitter. He never really hit for power except for a couple of years, but he was great at getting on base.

Mean Mr. Mustard
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

For sure; it was all the stuff we know now that never really showed up on his baseball cards. It’s just that when I think of him, I picture about 120-130 games a year. Memory is funny.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago

Not surprisingly, I think you can make the best “comps” pitching staff with the Dodgers of all the teams we’ve seen or will see: a rotation of Clemens, Pettitte, Stieb, Mulder, and Leiter backed with Ted Lilly and Sterling Hitchcock in long relief/starting depth, and a bullpen full of firemen: Troy Percival, Tom Henke, Randy Myers, Todd Jones, Roberto Hernandez, Jeff Nelson, etc.

You’ve got one of the three best starters ever, a borderline HOFer, and three “HOVG” starters in your rotation plus five 300-save guys or about 2,000 saves in total.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

Kershaw has to be disappointed that he comps to Andy Pettitte instead of Clayton Kershaw

edges64Member since 2021
4 years ago

Andy Pages scares me as a Giants fan

maximus74Member since 2025
4 years ago

a Matt Holliday comp on Andy Pages is interesting

treebeardedMember since 2019
4 years ago

There’s not another player in major league history who is a closer comp to Mookie Betts than Bob Elliot?

gettwobrute79Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  treebearded

I was gonna say that too. Bob Elliott was a very good player, but he was odd in that while he was good in his 20’s, he broke through to a higher level in his 30’s, winning an mvp. However, he never had seasons that close to Betts.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Love, love, love getting really in the weeds on ZiPS like this. Thanks Dan.

TMcDMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  treebearded

I, too, was surprised that Mookie’s #1 Comp was half of a legendary comedy team. Didn’t know Chris Elliot’s dad was also a ballplayer!

connjc
4 years ago

It would be an awesome story if Andrew Toles overcame his mental issues to return to baseball. However, I wouldn’t put him in these projections (even in spite of your big band orchestra caveat) considering his last game was 2018.

catmanwayne
4 years ago

Kershaw projected as the fourth best starter on the team (assuming Bauer’s legal problems clear up miraculously overnight, and Clayton stays in LA), just speaks to the quality and depth the Dodgers have in their rotation.