2023 Positional Power Rankings: Shortstop

Earlier today, Davy Andrews gave an accounting of the league’s third basemen. Now we turn our attention to the shortstops.

So, so deep. That’s true of the Mariana Trench, which extends some 36,000 feet below sea level, and also of the shortstop position in the major leagues. If you think of an average player as one who accrues roughly 2 WAR per 600 plate appearances, 29 teams are above average at shortstop. That’s because everyone puts their best athletes there for as long as they can, which results in an embarrassment of positional riches. You have to delve down to 25th on this list to get to a team whose aggregate projection is less than 3.0 WAR. No other position’s list of three-WARriors extends past 20th.
As a result, there are a lot of solid shortstops who come out of this exercise with strikingly low rankings. Tim Anderson, J.P. Crawford, and Jeremy Peña stand out to me in that category; all three are excellent, and could easily be All-Stars, particularly if compared to a different positional group. But in the crowded world of good shortstops, there are just so many options. The best defenders still play short, but it’s less and less a position where teams are willing to employ poor hitters. The past five years are the best aggregate offensive years for shortstops, as measured by wRC+, since 1947.
The top of this list is peppered with examples of how this has happened. In bygone eras, hitters like Carlos Correa, Corey Seager, and Xander Bogaerts wouldn’t play shortstop. They’d man third base, or perhaps an outfield corner, thanks to their size. The belief that shortstops need to be slight and limber is persistent, but it had already been cracking in previous eras, as Cal Ripken Jr. and Alex Rodriguez can attest. Now that conventional wisdom has been thoroughly discarded. The new question is whether Oneil Cruz can play shortstop at 6-foot-7, not whether Correa can at 6-foot-4. Now that shortstop takes a wider pool of baseball players, and with teams still trying to place their best players there in the minors, it’s no wonder that it’s hogging an increasing share of major league talent.
Spare a thought for the perfectly reasonable shortstops mired at the bottom of this list. They’re great baseball players, far better than you’d think from where they show up here. A league-average hitter who can hack it defensively at shortstop used to be a rare find. Now, it’s just business as usual. That doesn’t make those players any less fun to watch, or any less valuable to their teams relative to the next-best option, but it does emphasize how baseball is changing.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trea Turner | 665 | .292 | .345 | .471 | .353 | 21.0 | 4.0 | -0.1 | 5.7 |
| Edmundo Sosa | 28 | .243 | .297 | .374 | .294 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Bryson Stott | 7 | .247 | .313 | .385 | .308 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .290 | .343 | .466 | .350 | 20.6 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 5.9 |
What a difference a year makes. The Phillies came into the 2022 season with one of the worst shortstop situations in baseball, long on Didi Gregorius and short on hope. They cast Gregorius aside in favor of Stott and Sosa midseason and made the World Series. Their shortstop position was still kind of bad, though, and they needed Stott to cover other holes in the infield, so they went to the superstar market over the winter.
Turner wasn’t the best shortstop in baseball last year, but he wasn’t far off, and he’s coming off of his fifth straight excellent season. The only surprising thing about his 2022 performance was that he eased off on the basepaths, totaling only 27 steals. The new rules should give him a boost there, though: I wouldn’t be shocked to see him swipe 40 or 50 bags this year. The only thing stopping him is that the lineup behind him is homer-heavy, which makes steals slightly less valuable.
Regardless of the shape of his production, Turner looks like a fixture atop the Philadelphia lineup for years to come. When he needs a day off, Stott and Sosa will be able backups. I wouldn’t want them as my first two options, but between Stott’s lefty bat and Sosa’s plus defense, they’re an enviable backup tandem. We don’t think they’ll get many opportunities to show it, because Turner has been quite durable in recent years, but it’s worth remembering in case he misses any time. The Phillies came into last year with a bad first option and unproven backups. Now they’re in the opposite position. Isn’t money great?
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Correa | 560 | .274 | .353 | .466 | .355 | 22.1 | -0.9 | 2.7 | 5.0 |
| Royce Lewis | 77 | .262 | .323 | .439 | .332 | 1.6 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.5 |
| Kyle Farmer | 42 | .246 | .302 | .367 | .295 | -0.3 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Jorge Polanco | 14 | .261 | .336 | .442 | .339 | 0.4 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Nick Gordon | 7 | .255 | .302 | .401 | .306 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .270 | .346 | .455 | .348 | 23.8 | -0.9 | 2.7 | 5.8 |
For the second straight season, it’s hard to believe that the Twins landed Correa in free agency. But they did! And he’s great! A situation that looked dire as Correa landed first in San Francisco and then New York is back to being one of the best in the game. Another season like his last one – nearly 600 plate appearances of excellent offense – would go a long way towards the AL Central crown that dangled tantalizingly close to Minnesota’s grasp last year.
Normally, I’d spend most of this blurb telling you how good Correa is. I feel like that’s been done, though. He’s been one of the best in the business in recent years. If you think his true defensive talent level is closer to his 2021 self, he’s probably the best shortstop around period. If you think he’s more plus than elite, maybe he’s second or third on the list. He has plus power, doesn’t strike out much, and walks at a double-digit clip. It’s the kind of offensive skill set that is both humdrum and inarguably excellent.
Given all the injury noise, though, it’s worth considering the backup situation. Lewis is something of a wild card given how much time he’s missed in recent years. But unlike last year, when Jermaine Palacios was atrocious in spot duty, the Twins added a competent stopgap in Kyle Farmer. That gives them enviable coverage if Correa hits the IL for a brief stint or simply DHs for a few days to rest his legs. Minnesota’s lack of depth cost them dearly last year. This year, they’re hoping to fix that problem while getting more of the Correa goodness they lucked into in January.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Lindor | 672 | .253 | .325 | .435 | .330 | 14.9 | -0.0 | 6.4 | 5.4 |
| Luis Guillorme | 21 | .261 | .346 | .344 | .310 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Danny Mendick | 7 | .229 | .296 | .339 | .283 | -0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .253 | .326 | .432 | .329 | 14.9 | -0.1 | 6.4 | 5.5 |
Boring! We want shortstops who changed teams this winter, and preferably last year too. But Lindor is only boring from a transactional standpoint, because he put together one of the best years of his stellar career in 2022 and looks poised to repeat the trick this year.
Lindor doesn’t have elite power. He doesn’t have elite plate discipline or even elite speed. He’s still an excellent hitter, though, because he does two things well: make contact and put the ball in the air. He might not look like a 20-25 homer guy, but that’s exactly what he is.
That kind of offense would play anywhere on the diamond, but Lindor’s defense makes him special. He’s the kind of shortstop you’d play even if he had a below-average bat thanks to his combination of sure hands, great instincts, and an accurate arm. Statcast rates him as the best shortstop in baseball over the past two years – and the past three years, four years, five years, and so on.
Guillorme, like Lindor, is an excellent defender. Unlike Lindor, he’s a so-so hitter, so he only figures in the picture as a backup. This is the Lindor show – and even though the Mets have added a lot of star power in recent years, he’s still the main attraction in Queens.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wander Franco | 602 | .283 | .342 | .455 | .345 | 21.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 5.1 |
| Taylor Walls | 84 | .209 | .300 | .337 | .285 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Vidal Bruján | 7 | .236 | .300 | .356 | .291 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Charlie Culberson | 7 | .233 | .278 | .356 | .278 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .274 | .336 | .440 | .337 | 20.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 5.5 |
This is the first spot on the list that could raise a few eyebrows, but only because Franco is still building his major league resume. In roughly one season’s worth of plate appearances, he’s been excellent, rarely striking out and hitting for average and doubles power. He’s done that at a precocious age; he turned 22 earlier this month.
There are two knocks on Franco’s track record so far: health and defense. He missed half the season last year and seemed bothered by injury at times even when he was on the field. He was still worth 2.3 WAR in that abbreviated run, but it’s hard to be a superstar without playing a full season. He’s also more average than exceptional defensively, though his bat makes up for that, to the point where the Rays used him as a DH last year when he wasn’t healthy enough to play the field.
Amusingly, Franco might be the shortstop get-off-my-lawn types would most enjoy. He never strikes out and uses the entire field to lace line drive doubles. Just don’t tell them he’s 22 and fun. Also don’t tell them about the options behind him, because woof, Walls does not look like he can hit major league pitching. The more Franco the Rays get in 2023, the better their chances of making the playoffs.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corey Seager | 560 | .276 | .350 | .480 | .357 | 21.9 | -0.2 | -2.0 | 4.6 |
| Marcus Semien | 77 | .259 | .327 | .456 | .340 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Josh H. Smith | 35 | .240 | .333 | .357 | .310 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Ezequiel Duran | 21 | .241 | .286 | .401 | .299 | -0.2 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Davis Wendzel | 7 | .204 | .273 | .335 | .271 | -0.2 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .271 | .344 | .467 | .350 | 23.6 | -0.0 | -1.5 | 5.4 |
Out, damned shift! A precipitous drop in BABIP led to a down year for Seager – as much as you can call a 117 wRC+ and 4.5 WAR a down season. As a lefty who makes a ton of contact, Seager is the exact kind of hitter who this year’s shift restrictions aim to help. Mike Petriello estimated that he might be the hitter who benefits most, in fact. He might not even need the help; after a slow start, he heated up as the season went on, and no amount of shifting could defend his 33 homers.
The Rangers theoretically might want to give Seager rest at shortstop, given that he’s dealt with injury issues throughout his career and is more slugger than gloveman. Just one problem: their only credible backup shortstop is Semien, who is also their starting second baseman. If he were a backup, he’d be the best in the league by a mile, but again, he’s busy locking down another position for Texas. That means they’re quite reliant on Seager staying healthy and mobile. He did it last year, but if you’re looking for risks to our forecast, that strikes me as a large one.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xander Bogaerts | 630 | .268 | .346 | .428 | .339 | 16.5 | 0.6 | -2.0 | 4.5 |
| Ha-Seong Kim | 42 | .244 | .315 | .391 | .311 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Fernando Tatis Jr. | 21 | .274 | .355 | .569 | .391 | 1.4 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 0.2 |
| Jake Cronenworth | 7 | .252 | .337 | .411 | .328 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .266 | .344 | .430 | .338 | 18.2 | 0.7 | -1.6 | 5.1 |
The Padres were seventh on this list last year with a completely different shortstop. Tatis an outfielder now, though, and the new guy in town is picking up the slack. Bogaerts is the fourth-best of the four marquee shortstops to hit free agency in the past two years, but that’s like saying “Blank Space” is the fourth best song on Taylor Swift’s 1989. It’s true but not meaningful – “Blank Space” is great, and so is Bogaerts, regardless of the context you put him in.
Bogaerts’s greatest skill is hard to pin down, which makes him hard to evaluate. He’s pretty good at everything without being great at anything, though his top-end power is right on the solid/great border. He’s been almost exactly 30% better than league average offensively in each of the past five years, the 20th-best hitter in baseball, but he’s never hit even 35 homers. Some of that is Fenway Park’s interaction with fly balls, but some of it is just who he is.
A career year defensively in 2022 catapulted Bogaerts to his best single-year WAR mark, but he’s probably a below-average defender at shortstop. Kim, his primary backup, is stellar defensively, and might move Bogaerts to DH at times this year when the team wants their best defense on the field. That defensive shuffle might get harder over the years, but for 2023, Bogaerts is a middle-of-the-order bat who can handle shortstop.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bo Bichette | 658 | .280 | .328 | .472 | .346 | 20.6 | 0.6 | -7.2 | 4.4 |
| Santiago Espinal | 28 | .269 | .326 | .382 | .312 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Addison Barger | 14 | .243 | .297 | .417 | .309 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .279 | .327 | .468 | .344 | 20.7 | 0.6 | -7.0 | 4.6 |
Bichette spent most of last season looking awful. He’s always been tremendously aggressive at the plate, but it seemed to backfire on him. He struck out too much, walked sparingly, and put the ball on the ground too often. He came into September with a 106 wRC+ – and then hit a scalding .406/.444/.662 for the last month of the season and finished with a normal-looking Bichette year.
How do we evaluate that? By saying hey, baseball players sure are streaky, and penciling him in for another year of frustrating Jays fans with an approach that makes you scream “I could do better” while performing like one of the best hitters in baseball. That’s who he is at this point – but that’s a very valuable person to be, and we’re past the point of saying “I don’t know if this is sustainable.” He’s sustaining it, isn’t he?
I’m less enthused by Bichette’s defense, which is somewhere between bad and cover-your-eyes depending on who you listen to. That might necessitate a move to second or third later in his career, but for now, the Jays will take the over-aggressive approach and iffy defense and like it. When you hit like Bichette, the other stuff just matters less.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willy Adames | 623 | .248 | .318 | .454 | .334 | 11.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 4.2 |
| Luis Urías | 42 | .242 | .332 | .413 | .328 | 0.6 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Brice Turang | 28 | .236 | .307 | .341 | .288 | -0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Owen Miller | 7 | .236 | .294 | .354 | .286 | -0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .247 | .318 | .446 | .331 | 10.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 4.5 |
Adames’ career has been a series of ebbs and flows. Sometimes he’s a defensive wizard, sometimes a power hitter, but rarely both at once. In 2022, he clobbered 30 homers and played the best defense of his career, which vaulted him to a career-best season despite worrying strikeout numbers. In 2023, we think he’ll regress towards his career norms across the board – worse defense, better offense, and yes, still worrying strikeout numbers, the one constant throughout his career.
That mix of skills still works out to an All Star-level player, and that’s exactly what the Brewers are hoping for from Adames this season. The cupboard is bare behind him; Urías is miscast defensively here and also busy starting at third base, while Turang will spend plenty of time at second and hasn’t yet made his major league debut. It’s Adames or nothing, but if the last two years are any indication, that’ll work out just fine for Milwaukee.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dansby Swanson | 665 | .254 | .317 | .426 | .324 | 7.0 | 1.4 | 3.4 | 4.3 |
| Nico Hoerner | 21 | .276 | .330 | .397 | .317 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Christopher Morel | 14 | .231 | .297 | .413 | .310 | -0.0 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .254 | .317 | .425 | .323 | 7.1 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 4.5 |
The Cubs made their triumphant return to free agency spending this year by signing Swanson, who immediately projects as their best player. Don’t let his scrappy demeanor fool you; he’s a grip-it-and-rip-it hitter who will try to lift and pull everything he sees, producing strikeouts and extra base hits by the bucketful. It’s a skill set that feels more at home on a corner outfielder in my mental model of baseball players, but that doesn’t make it any less valuable in a sweet-fielding shortstop.
That’s Swanson’s best skill: he could be an average hitter and still deliver star-level value with his defense. It’s a good thing, too, because he’s been an average hitter over the course of his career. We think he’ll be somewhat better than that this year, but only somewhat; the glove is the attraction here.
That’s a tough break for Hoerner, an excellent defender himself who moved to second base when the team signed Swanson, but that gives the Cubs enviable redundancy if either misses time. Maybe the rest of the squad isn’t ready to compete, but when it comes to defensive depth at shortstop, the Cubs are the best in the business.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Edman | 574 | .263 | .318 | .398 | .313 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 3.6 |
| Paul DeJong | 98 | .211 | .287 | .385 | .296 | -0.8 | -0.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Brendan Donovan | 21 | .260 | .356 | .364 | .324 | 0.3 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.1 |
| Taylor Motter | 7 | .211 | .298 | .379 | .298 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .255 | .314 | .395 | .311 | 2.7 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Three generations of Devil Magic under one projection — how heartwarming! DeJong was an out-of-nowhere star shortstop until he turned into a pumpkin, by which time Edman had risen to the majors as an improbably competent hitter with phenomenal defense at second base. Now Edman has claimed shortstop, while Donovan appeared out of nowhere to lay claim to second base last year, again thanks to improbable competence offensively. They can’t keep getting away with it, can they?
Clearly, we think they can. Edman has phenomenal range and excellent bat control, which leads to an empty-average style statline that nevertheless sees him on base fairly often thanks to how rarely he strikes out. That plays just fine given his defense, and we forecast him to be a great defender yet again. DeJong is probably on his last chance with the team – he couldn’t hit a lick in 2022, and hasn’t been above average offensively since 2019 – but he’s a useful backup for now. With a pitch-to-contact team and a huge stadium, defense is the order of the day for St. Louis, and Edman is the perfect shortstop for their groundball-inhaling infield – at least until top prospect Masyn Winn arrives and pushes him back to second.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oneil Cruz | 525 | .246 | .314 | .452 | .332 | 8.3 | 0.4 | -2.2 | 3.1 |
| Ji Hwan Bae | 105 | .255 | .321 | .374 | .307 | -0.4 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 0.4 |
| Rodolfo Castro | 35 | .227 | .290 | .396 | .300 | -0.3 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Liover Peguero | 28 | .238 | .280 | .346 | .275 | -0.8 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Chris Owings | 7 | .204 | .274 | .330 | .269 | -0.2 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .246 | .312 | .432 | .323 | 6.5 | 0.5 | -2.4 | 3.7 |
If you like your shortstops improbably tall and powerful, Cruz is your guy. He’s 6-foot-7 and a threat to Giancarlo Stanton as the man with the most raw power in baseball. Does he strike out too much? Indubitably. Can he handle shortstop long-term? That remains to be seen. But he’s going to be incredibly fun to watch while trying to make it all work, because he looks like no one else who has played the position before, ever.
I’m a Cruz believer, and 2022 is a good example of why: He struck out 35% of the time, posted a reasonable BABIP, and still produced an above-average batting line thanks to tremendous power production. He even reined in his strikeouts in the second half of the year. It’s always going to be a struggle to make contact with his huge levers and long swing, but when he does, hoo boy. Similarly, I don’t know how his agility will hold up to the rigors of playing major league shortstop, but when he uncorks a throw from deep in the hole, you can almost hear the first baseman praying, so prodigious is his arm strength.
Cruz isn’t the only attraction here; we’re projecting Bae to snag some time when he’s not playing second base. He’s the anti-Cruz, contact over power, but he’s fast and versatile. Pittsburgh probably needs Cruz to excel to build their next great core, but Bae is a nice consolation prize and might help the big league club just as much this year.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bobby Witt Jr. | 609 | .263 | .311 | .456 | .330 | 8.7 | 2.5 | -5.2 | 3.4 |
| Nicky Lopez | 63 | .259 | .318 | .336 | .292 | -1.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| Maikel Garcia | 21 | .251 | .306 | .353 | .291 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Johan Camargo | 7 | .253 | .314 | .381 | .306 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .262 | .311 | .442 | .325 | 7.3 | 2.7 | -4.5 | 3.7 |
Witt came into last year with a pile of prospect hype, and he’s coming into this year with far less fanfare. But while he wasn’t J-Rodian, he put up a solid season while switching positions midway through the year. His game is a delightful blend of speed and power, but when you describe someone that way, the oft-unsaid part is: yeah, but can he hit? Witt doesn’t run disastrous strikeout rates or anything, but he’s voracious at the plate, swinging so often and so indiscriminately that he often put tough pitches into play instead of cookies.
His major league struggles (he was a league average hitter, so “struggle” is relative) are normal for someone who was simply too talented to be challenged in the minor leagues. The hope for Witt is that he’ll smooth out the edges in year two as the game slows down for him. That same general hurriedness carried over into his defense, where he made a ton of errors en route to a rough showing. A little patience, a little defensive improvement, and we might be talking about Witt earlier on this list in a year.
Also, hey, Nicky Lopez, he’s fun! He’ll mostly play second, but he has the defensive chops to slide over when Witt gets a breather. His production looks nothing like Witt’s, but as teams adjust to the shiftless new world, a slick defensive backup feels like a luxury.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrique Hernández | 392 | .246 | .318 | .406 | .317 | 0.6 | -0.0 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
| Adalberto Mondesi | 280 | .240 | .282 | .401 | .296 | -4.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 |
| Christian Arroyo | 14 | .265 | .315 | .421 | .320 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Yu Chang | 7 | .233 | .298 | .388 | .301 | -0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Bobby Dalbec | 7 | .221 | .292 | .422 | .310 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .243 | .303 | .404 | .309 | -3.8 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 3.6 |
Boy, this would look better with Trevor Story. Hernández pulled off a neat trick by turning into an excellent defensive center fielder in his first two seasons in Boston, but he’ll have to do it again at another up-the-middle position this year in the wake of Story’s potentially season-ending surgery. He’ll also need to get right offensively; a severe power outage led to a miserable 75 wRC+. It seems to be more pitch selection and consistency related than a loss of ability to drive the ball, which explains why our projections expect a return to normalcy, but that’ll be something to keep an eye on as the Sox try to cobble together a solid shortstop out of two part-timers.
Mondesi is that second part-timer. While Hernández will split his time between short and center, Mondesi will split his between short and the injured list if history is any guide. He’ll miss the start of the season rehabbing the ACL he tore last year, and even when he’s back in action, he’ll be a mystery box: he’s hardly played in the last two years, so projecting his output is wildly speculative. He’s always been a brilliant defender, but his offense has never quite come together. Boston is hoping he’ll fulfill the promise he showed early in his career. Even if he doesn’t, though, 280 plate appearances of competent defense would do quite nicely.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amed Rosario | 616 | .276 | .312 | .406 | .312 | 2.3 | 1.4 | -1.3 | 3.0 |
| Andrés Giménez | 49 | .266 | .334 | .423 | .330 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Gabriel Arias | 21 | .239 | .299 | .379 | .298 | -0.2 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.1 |
| Tyler Freeman | 14 | .267 | .328 | .362 | .308 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .274 | .313 | .405 | .313 | 3.0 | 1.5 | -0.8 | 3.5 |
I’d call this ranking Rosario slander if we weren’t projecting him for a clean three wins above replacement. Shortstop is just deep right now. A slow starter in New York, Rosario has turned into a consistent contributor in the shadow of Lake Erie, with enough power to punish mistakes and enough bat control to avoid the strikeout problems that sometime plague free swingers. He’s also improved on defense; he’s still below average to my eyes, but not by much. The result of average offense and near-average defense at a tough position is an above-average player, which lines up neatly with our projection.
The Guardians have reportedly been shopping Rosario around to shortstop-needy teams of late. That’s partially because he’ll be a free agent after this year, but also partially because Giménez showed off superstar upside last year and is the team’s long-term plan at the position. We’re only projecting him for occasional duty here – he’s busy manning second base – but I think there’s a good chance Cleveland finds a taker for Rosario and pivots to Giménez full-time. (That would rocket them up the rankings, for whatever that’s worth.)
Behind Giménez’s cameo brilliance, we’re penciling two exciting youngsters in for the rest of the action. Arias and Freeman are just two of a wave of interesting middle infield prospects in the pipeline for Cleveland, with a legion behind them. Suffice it to say that depth isn’t a problem for the Guardians.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J.P. Crawford | 609 | .253 | .336 | .360 | .311 | 5.2 | -0.7 | -1.2 | 3.1 |
| Dylan Moore | 70 | .212 | .317 | .369 | .306 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Sam Haggerty | 14 | .225 | .297 | .344 | .283 | -0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Mason McCoy | 7 | .204 | .261 | .317 | .256 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .248 | .333 | .360 | .310 | 5.0 | -0.4 | -1.1 | 3.5 |
Welcome to the world of high expectations, Mariners fans. Crawford has been steady in Seattle, particularly if you take last year’s poor defensive numbers with a grain of salt. He’s part of the veteran core of this Mariners team, but there was still popular consensus around signing a top-tier shortstop and moving on from Crawford only a year into his recent contract extension.
I don’t really get it, because Crawford is the kind of solid building block that teams love to accumulate around their stars. His offensive game is low-wattage but high-competence. Not everyone has light-tower power, and Crawford understands his own limitations there, opting instead to work walks and spray flares to all fields. It’s a capped offensive profile, but he makes the most of it. Singles and walks might not get you on video game covers, but they get you on base for the boppers to send you home happy.
Whether sticking with Crawford pays off will likely come down to his defense. His numbers took a sharp dip in 2022, but he’d previously looked like a 60 defender, and defensive metrics are notoriously noisy. A return to form there would go a long way towards shoring up the Mariners roster around Julio Rodríguez. We’re allocating most of the rest of their playing time to Moore and Haggerty, but they’re more utilitymen than everyday starters, so Seattle is counting on Crawford to come through again.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Anderson | 602 | .289 | .322 | .428 | .326 | 8.3 | 2.5 | -6.0 | 3.2 |
| Lenyn Sosa | 49 | .247 | .288 | .381 | .292 | -0.6 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Elvis Andrus | 28 | .245 | .296 | .362 | .290 | -0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Leury Garcia | 14 | .251 | .294 | .344 | .282 | -0.3 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Romy Gonzalez | 7 | .220 | .274 | .373 | .283 | -0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .283 | .318 | .420 | .321 | 6.9 | 2.5 | -5.9 | 3.5 |
Now this is disrespect. Anderson has been one of the best shortstops in baseball when healthy, and he played for the US in the World Baseball classic in front of a ton of the guys ahead of him on this list. Anderson’s game is so singular that projection systems have consistently expected him to hit for a lower average, but his .352 career BABIP built on hard line drives sprayed to all fields keeps confounding the regression demons.
Maybe one day it will all come crashing down, but at this point I think Anderson is more likely to keep hitting for average while the rest of his game declines. His defense is workmanlike but on the decline, his 95th-percentile exit velocity trend is terrifying, and there’s only so far BABIP can go if you walk at a 4% clip and don’t hit for power. I still think Anderson will beat this projection, but it increasingly seems like when the decline comes, it will be in everything except the one thing that looks the least sustainable.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Crawford | 525 | .247 | .321 | .393 | .312 | 1.4 | -0.9 | -0.1 | 2.5 |
| Thairo Estrada | 154 | .262 | .321 | .411 | .321 | 1.5 | 0.2 | -0.6 | 0.8 |
| Brett Wisely | 14 | .239 | .304 | .366 | .296 | -0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Isan Díaz | 7 | .222 | .305 | .378 | .300 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .250 | .320 | .397 | .314 | 2.8 | -0.7 | -0.8 | 3.4 |
We’re more than halfway through, so it’s time for a quick story. At the first Giants game I attended after moving to San Francisco, I met a Brandon Crawford superfan, clad head to toe in Crawford paraphernalia and pulling out all the stops to cheer him on every time he stepped to the plate, made a defensive play, or looked over towards our deep right field seats. That’s the kind of career Crawford has forged in the Bay, a steady presence across years of thrilling Giants teams.
The point of that story? I’m not sure it matters much to Giants fans whether we’re a few spots high or a few spots low on Crawford this year. He’s a franchise icon, and 2023 will either add to his legend if he’s good or not matter at all if he’s bad. Our projections have him edging over into good territory, but only by a hair; at least some power rebound seems likely after a disastrous 2022 output, and he continues to excel on defense. Those are the high points, but there are danger signs too. His OBP plummeted, and not in a particularly fluky way, and he’s already dealing with a knee injury that required a cortisone shot.
This feels like Crawford’s last hurrah with the team, as his contract expires at year’s end. Estrada will slide over from second to spell him, and likely take over the position full-time next year if he continues his recent form. But however 2023 goes, I’m going to forever associate Crawford with that superfan. I hope she gets at least one more thing to cheer about before all is said and done.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jorge Mateo | 385 | .230 | .275 | .376 | .284 | -7.0 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.4 |
| Gunnar Henderson | 245 | .254 | .345 | .438 | .343 | 6.9 | 0.1 | -1.2 | 1.7 |
| Joey Ortiz | 49 | .242 | .298 | .369 | .293 | -0.6 | -0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Jordan Westburg | 14 | .233 | .307 | .387 | .306 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.1 |
| Ramón Urías | 7 | .250 | .319 | .409 | .319 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .239 | .303 | .397 | .306 | -0.6 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 3.4 |
This playing time projection is the numerical equivalent of throwing your hands up in the air. Henderson looks bound for stardom, be it at third or shortstop, but Mateo is still holding on to the position for now after a solid defensive year established him as the everyday starter. His offensive numbers are downright ugly – that .284 projected wOBA is the second-lowest for anyone in this article with 100 or more PAs – but you can get away with that kind of bat at shortstop if your glove is transcendent.
In 2022, Mateo’s was, but he’d never flashed that level of defense before, so Orioles talent evaluators will have their work cut out for them early in the year. Henderson will likely start the season at third base, but if Mateo’s defense looks shaky, the team should make the switch sooner rather than later. Those offensive numbers next to Henderson’s name are no joke — think Corey Seager, if you’re looking for a parallel as an offense-first lefty shortstop. 2023 is just the start of Baltimore’s plan for contention, but what they do at shortstop will have ramifications for both this year and the future.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Peña | 616 | .247 | .296 | .414 | .309 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Mauricio Dubón | 49 | .255 | .303 | .381 | .299 | -0.3 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| David Hensley | 28 | .240 | .319 | .363 | .303 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.3 | 0.1 |
| Dixon Machado | 7 | .238 | .310 | .334 | .289 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .247 | .298 | .409 | .308 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 3.3 |
I was shocked to see Peña here when I started working up this list, but the competition is fierce at shortstop. The 24th and 11th spots on these rankings are separated by a slender 0.7 WAR, which means you could realistically shuffle that whole mess around without changing the projections much at all. When everyone is this similar, the differences come down to nitpicking, and Peña has a few nits to pick. He’s a young defensive wizard, but his on-base skills leave something to be desired, which is exactly the weakness we’re projecting him for. His aggressive approach and middling contact numbers mean he’ll strike out an average amount but rarely walk, which puts a lot of pressure on the power to make the whole package work.
Be that as it may, the reason the Astros rank 19th and not 14th (or something like that) is more about the guys behind Peña than any shortcoming on his part. A 3-WAR projection is nothing to sneeze at, after all. The backups behind him, on the other hand, are pretty close to replacement level, and Dubón’s offense cratered to a scary extent last year. Houston was confident enough in Peña to plug him right into the lineup when Carlos Correa departed, but now they’re betting on his health as well, because depth looks like a clear weakness here.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miguel Rojas | 448 | .256 | .307 | .371 | .298 | -3.8 | -0.4 | 3.9 | 2.1 |
| Chris Taylor | 210 | .230 | .313 | .389 | .309 | 0.0 | 0.4 | -0.0 | 1.0 |
| Yonny Hernandez | 42 | .223 | .321 | .285 | .279 | -1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .247 | .310 | .371 | .300 | -4.7 | 0.2 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Trust the Dodgers to punt shortstop, sit out the enticing free agency market, make some milquetoast trade, and project right in the middle of a pack of teams trying to fix their shortstop situation anyway. It’s a very Dodgers approach, and their projection above highlights two things: they have some exciting multi-position players, and they’re good at identifying trade targets they’ll be able to use.
Rojas is nobody’s idea of a star. He’s a defense-first, zero-true-outcomes type, which means that a down year of BABIP can turn his overall line from desultory to atrocious (see: 2022). At 34, his sterling defense might be trending the wrong way; at the very least, it would be a good idea to give him frequent rest to keep his legs fresh.
Luckily, that’s exactly how the Dodgers are built. Taylor can handle shortstop at least passably well when he’s not busy traipsing around the outfield or other infield positions or what have you. He missed time with injury last year and hit below his established level when he was on the field, two facts that might be related. Shuffle the two of them through shortstop, give Taylor plenty of time elsewhere, and you can probably get both to 500 plate appearances with ample rest opportunities. That works out to a solid projection, even if Dodgers fans will understandably grumble about how much better the team would look with a star in that spot.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Báez | 609 | .244 | .288 | .419 | .306 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.9 |
| Nick Maton | 49 | .225 | .306 | .358 | .295 | -0.4 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Zack Short | 28 | .199 | .300 | .324 | .281 | -0.5 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Ryan Kreidler | 14 | .218 | .295 | .346 | .286 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .241 | .290 | .410 | .304 | -0.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 3.2 |
See, the Tigers signed a free agent shortstop to compete with the big boys, and they have the same projection as the Dodgers. To be fair, that’s because the free agent shortstop they picked happened to turn into a pumpkin last year, but hey, that’s how life works out sometimes. Báez was the worst version of himself in 2022, flipping back and forth between more and less aggressive at the plate repeatedly. That somehow ended up with him swinging more at balls and less at strikes, and while his strikeout rate fell, so too did his power. Overall, it was a reminder of how thin the line is between just enough aggression and far too much.
Of course, part of the magic of the Báez experience is that he can go from unplayable to outstanding in a heartbeat. That wild swing at a curveball a foot off the outside corner is miserable until it turns into a double. The swing-at-everything mentality is maddening until it starts turning into tattooed fastballs. Staple that to solid defense, and you get a player who ranges between frustratingly average and near-star-level. Even in his miserable 2022, Báez ended up producing a 2-WAR season. The Tigers are hoping for much more to get back into contention, but they’ll need at least a decent rebound just to be competitive.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Volpe | 336 | .232 | .311 | .395 | .311 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.7 |
| Oswald Peraza | 217 | .243 | .300 | .384 | .301 | -0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Isiah Kiner-Falefa | 126 | .258 | .309 | .345 | .289 | -1.7 | 0.3 | -0.9 | 0.3 |
| Oswaldo Cabrera | 21 | .231 | .290 | .398 | .300 | -0.1 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .240 | .307 | .382 | .304 | -1.5 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 3.1 |
Death, taxes, and me writing about Kiner-Falefa. This year, he’s the third wheel in a prospect-fronted time share, so I’ll only mention him to say that he’s a really nice third option at short, the kind of utility infielder you’d feel comfortable with anywhere he needs to play. The highlight of this unit, though, is Volpe, the all-everything prospect who is in the process of forcing his way to the majors by cutting through minor league pitchers like hot butter. It’s reasonable to wonder whether he’ll have to move off shortstop long-term, and also whether his aggressive swing will lead to a bundle of strikeouts, but if neither of those things happen, he’s going to be a star.
Peraza doesn’t have quite the same minor league pedigree, but he’s certainly no slouch in that department either. He managed nearly as many minor league homers as Volpe despite fewer plate appearances and a tougher assignment, and excelled in a cup of major league coffee to boot. He also looks like a better bet to stick at shortstop. His lack of true top-end power makes it harder to envision him turning into a perennial All-Star, but that’s praise via faint damnation. If that’s the worst I can say about him, that’s a pretty good sign. The close split of playing time represents how unsure we are of who the Bombers will turn to, but both of these options look excellent to me.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joey Wendle | 308 | .264 | .312 | .390 | .307 | -0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.4 |
| José Iglesias | 259 | .283 | .318 | .391 | .311 | 0.6 | -0.4 | -0.5 | 1.2 |
| Jon Berti | 70 | .235 | .321 | .341 | .298 | -0.6 | 0.7 | -0.2 | 0.3 |
| Jacob Amaya | 35 | .223 | .301 | .339 | .286 | -0.6 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Jordan Groshans | 21 | .254 | .324 | .345 | .299 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Jean Segura | 7 | .273 | .330 | .390 | .317 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .266 | .315 | .382 | .306 | -0.9 | 0.3 | -0.6 | 3.1 |
We’re handing out 3-WAR projections to everybody this year, I guess. This situation could charitably be described as a mishmash. It’s basically everyone on the team bus who raised their hand when the coach asked who could play shortstop. I’m not saying it won’t work, but for a team that has a spectacular pitching staff and needs just a bit of help from the offense to get over the hump, this feels like not enough of a plan.
Wendle might be able to hack it at shortstop. He hasn’t played there much, but he’s acquitted himself well when he has. It’s probably not ideal for your shortstop to be switching to the position full-time for the first time in his professional career at age 33, but Wendle has consistently surpassed my expectations throughout his time in the big leagues, so maybe this will just be another notch in his belt.
There’s no question that Iglesias can play short, so he’s a possible plan B if Wendle turns out to be better suited for second or if Luis Arraez isn’t quite up to second and the whole infield has to shift around. Berti fits into the puzzle somewhere too, when he’s not busy backing up every other position on the diamond and stealing bases as easily as most humans breathe. At the end of the day, someone will stand there, but I’ll be surprised if they manage a line over a 100 wRC+ or provide excellent defense, so this feels mostly like filler to me, which is not where you want to be if you’re the Marlins.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ezequiel Tovar | 560 | .275 | .320 | .437 | .329 | -1.9 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 2.7 |
| Alan Trejo | 98 | .251 | .288 | .426 | .309 | -1.9 | -0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Harold Castro | 35 | .290 | .321 | .402 | .315 | -0.5 | -0.1 | -0.3 | 0.1 |
| Cole Tucker | 7 | .227 | .289 | .342 | .280 | -0.3 | -0.0 | -0.1 | -0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .272 | .315 | .433 | .325 | -4.6 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 3.0 |
Ah, we’ve reached the prospect crush section of the rankings. Tovar had never played above A-ball before last year, but then he torched Double-A and took advantage of injury-related turmoil on the big league club to rocket all the way up to Denver. He’s a slasher rather than a bopper offensively, and the less said about his plate discipline the better, but he’s displayed a tremendous feel to hit throughout the minors. That kind of offensive profile is a snug fit for Coors Field’s spacious outfield; opposing outfielders are sure to get tired of chasing down his unending string of flares and burners.
That’s all well and good, but defense is Tovar’s true calling card. He combines tremendous range with savant-like instincts and generally makes shortstop look easier than it is. That’s the kind of skill set that will give Tovar plenty of rope even if he’s struggling at the plate. And look, let’s not mince words — he might struggle at the plate. Tovar chased far too much in the minors, and major league pitchers all have plus sliders compared to what he saw in Double-A. Luckily for Tovar, Colorado doesn’t have the kind of so-so veterans they’ve often blocked prospects with, so I think he’ll have ample opportunity to prove he can stay afloat.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Fletcher | 280 | .270 | .312 | .351 | .293 | -3.9 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| Luis Rengifo | 196 | .256 | .305 | .407 | .310 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.9 |
| Gio Urshela | 140 | .272 | .321 | .425 | .324 | 1.5 | -0.4 | -0.5 | 0.7 |
| Andrew Velazquez | 49 | .211 | .267 | .338 | .267 | -1.7 | 0.2 | -0.0 | 0.1 |
| Livan Soto | 21 | .232 | .296 | .321 | .276 | -0.6 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Brandon Drury | 14 | .244 | .298 | .426 | .315 | 0.1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .261 | .308 | .381 | .302 | -4.4 | -0.2 | -0.0 | 2.6 |
I consider myself a Fletcher fanboy. I always wondered what would happen if someone with a swing that looks like it’s geared for fast-pitch softball reached the major leagues, and he appears to have the answer: no strikeouts, no walks, and no power, resulting in a fairly uninspiring batting line. When he’s doing at least a little damage or hitting for average, his defense makes the whole profile work. When he’s not – well, that’s where Rengifo and Urshela come in.
The reason those guys are in a time share with Fletcher rather than simply taking the job from him is that they’re both a bit light on glove to play shortstop. Rengifo is close to positionless, below average but playable across the infield. That’s not a normal résumé for a shortstop, but he’s a league-average bat, and the Angels might need offense badly enough to risk a few extra outs on defense. It’s not an ideal situation, but it’s nice to have options: if either Fletcher or Rengifo’s greatest weakness proves debilitating, the other can step in.
That leaves out Urshela, who is mostly on the team for Anthony Rendon insurance but might also be better than both Fletcher and Rengifo. It’s far from a certainty that he can handle shortstop (defensive systems can’t even agree on whether he’s a good third baseman), but he has more pop in his bat than either of them. If Rendon plays every day and Urshela keeps hitting, something will have to give to get his bat in the lineup. Shortstop feels like the easiest place for that. But things rarely go according to plan, so let’s pencil in that option as a solid maybe.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orlando Arcia | 392 | .244 | .307 | .393 | .307 | -2.3 | -0.2 | -0.2 | 1.5 |
| Vaughn Grissom | 224 | .262 | .327 | .387 | .315 | 0.1 | 0.2 | -1.6 | 0.9 |
| Braden Shewmake | 63 | .233 | .278 | .362 | .281 | -1.7 | -0.0 | -0.2 | 0.1 |
| Ehire Adrianza | 21 | .235 | .309 | .342 | .291 | -0.4 | -0.0 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .248 | .311 | .387 | .307 | -4.3 | 0.0 | -2.1 | 2.6 |
I truly don’t know what to make of the Braves’ chaotic mix. Grissom came into spring as the obvious fit for the job. The team was confident enough in his ability to play short that they didn’t recruit any help in free agency and instead dispatched Ron Washington to work with him on defense. Then he caught some surprising competition from all-glove minor leaguer Shewmake, and suddenly the job was a competition between those two.
Clearly, no one won that competition, because they were both optioned to Triple-A, leaving Arcia as the starting shortstop. The team clearly trusts him – he took over Grissom’s spot at second base in the playoffs last year – but he hasn’t been an everyday starter since 2019, and he was ghastly that year. Our projections believe he’ll be a league-average hitter, but his career line stands at .243/.295/.369, so there’s certainly risk to the downside here.
Most likely, one of Grissom or Shewmake will end up with the job, because they’re the two players that Atlanta placed in a competition for it. But then why not keep one of them up now? I can’t quite put my finger on it, but something seems amiss here.
Let this be a cautionary tale: if you let your All-Star shortstop leave and choose not to replace him in free agency, try to have a prospect in mind. Otherwise, you might end up shuffling between three options you’re unhappy with. The Braves have some very high highs on their roster, but this position feels like it could be quite problematic if one of the two youngsters doesn’t seize the job.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Allen | 490 | .231 | .289 | .327 | .275 | -9.9 | -0.2 | 4.7 | 1.6 |
| Aledmys Díaz | 133 | .245 | .301 | .390 | .302 | 0.2 | -0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Kevin Smith | 70 | .210 | .267 | .358 | .273 | -1.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Tyler Wade | 7 | .229 | .302 | .323 | .280 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .231 | .290 | .342 | .280 | -11.2 | -0.5 | 5.1 | 2.4 |
If Allen were a league-average hitter, he’d be a star. He’s a sensational defender, combining surprising arm strength with enviable instincts and range. I could watch him field all day and be happy about it. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for his offense. He showed flashes of lift-and-pull dynamism in the minors, but his recent track record mostly involves getting the bat knocked out of his hands by pitchers who see a 5-foot-8 batter and attack.
You can imagine Allen improving his offensive output, not to superstar levels perhaps, but to acceptable no. 6 hitter heights. If he managed it, his batting line would look a lot like that of Díaz, who is competing for the starting shortstop job but seems ticketed for a super-utility role at the moment. He started games at six different positions (not counting DH) for Houston last year, and Oakland’s patchwork roster will give him ample opportunity to repeat the feat this year.
The ideal outcome for Oakland is that Allen improves to a near-average hitter, freeing up Díaz to appear more or less everywhere else. The second-best outcome is that Díaz has a monster offensive season that makes up for his so-so defense. The third-best outcome? That’s Smith, I guess, but he looks like a better fit at third, and his transition to hitting major league pitching hasn’t exactly gone well. It’s not quite Allen-or-bust, but that’s an acceptable shorthand way of thinking about it.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJ Abrams | 560 | .261 | .302 | .384 | .301 | -5.6 | 0.5 | -0.2 | 2.1 |
| Ildemaro Vargas | 77 | .250 | .293 | .370 | .290 | -1.4 | -0.0 | -0.2 | 0.2 |
| Jeter Downs | 21 | .198 | .271 | .353 | .276 | -0.6 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Luis García | 21 | .263 | .300 | .421 | .311 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.2 | 0.1 |
| Carter Kieboom | 21 | .229 | .324 | .362 | .306 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .257 | .301 | .382 | .299 | -7.8 | 0.4 | -0.8 | 2.4 |
Credit to the Nationals where it’s due: they aren’t wasting time giving their fans a look at the players they got back in the Juan Soto trade. Abrams is only 22 and has barely 100 minor league games under his belt, so you could imagine the team stashing him in the minors this year. But he’s pretty clearly their best option at shortstop, and rather than find some excuse not to play him, they’re letting him develop at the major league level. Ideally, that development will involve moderating his aggressive approach at the plate, which boiled down to “swing at anything that moves” last year to his detriment.
If the Nationals get what they’re hoping for out of Abrams, he’ll be a joy to watch. He’ll probably never hit 30 homers in a season, but he has an all-fields line drive approach that complements his impressive speed. He seems to me like a beneficiary of a shift ban, too: lefties who can’t hit the ball over the wall naturally have more of their value tied up in grounders. He also has work to do on the defensive end, but again, he barely played 100 games in the minors and he’s only 22. Some improvement is a given; how much he improves is yet to be seen.
The reason that Abrams is getting this chance is also the reason that we have a bunch of dart throws below him on the list. I like all these guys, but not as starting shortstops for good teams. Only García fits that description, even if you’re being generous, and he’s starting at second. The Nats won’t be good this year, but they’ll be a lot less bad (and more exciting for the future) if Abrams delivers.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Ahmed | 420 | .237 | .294 | .373 | .292 | -7.3 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 1.4 |
| Geraldo Perdomo | 196 | .224 | .313 | .319 | .285 | -4.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| Josh Rojas | 84 | .249 | .332 | .384 | .316 | 0.2 | 0.3 | -0.0 | 0.4 |
| Total | 700 | .235 | .304 | .360 | .293 | -11.6 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 2.3 |
There’s no shame in being 29th on this list, because shortstop is stacked this year. Ahmed is an unheralded defensive wizard and a link to Arizona’s past, but he can still pick it. He’s a bad hitter – like, a really bad hitter – but he’s also one of the best shortstop defenders of the past decade, regardless of which advanced defensive metric (or eye test) you’re partial to. If you’ve ever wanted to answer the question of how poorly a shortstop could hit while still being valuable, his career is a good data point. His 75 wRC+ is ghastly and he’s racked up 2.5 WAR per 600 plate appearances anyway.
Perdomo was supposed to supplant Ahmed at shortstop, but the timing hasn’t worked out. He was thrust into the job last year due to injury, and posted an absolutely gruesome 58 wRC+ with average defense. Scouts think he’ll improve defensively, and mean reversion nearly guarantees he’ll improve offensively, but make no mistake: there’s distinct bust risk here. That’s how you end up penciling in Rojas, whose best defensive position might be DH, as another backup. The Diamondbacks want to compete this year, and they can’t have another 2022 Perdomo offensive performance if they’re going to do so.
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Newman | 441 | .268 | .311 | .371 | .299 | -7.8 | 0.3 | -2.1 | 1.0 |
| Jose Barrero | 154 | .211 | .265 | .344 | .269 | -6.4 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Elly De La Cruz | 70 | .248 | .290 | .426 | .308 | -0.7 | 0.1 | -0.4 | 0.2 |
| Chad Pinder | 35 | .226 | .270 | .379 | .283 | -1.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .251 | .296 | .371 | .293 | -16.0 | 0.5 | -2.6 | 1.4 |
Okay, there’s at least a little shame in finishing 30th on this list. That’s what you get for starting somebody who couldn’t hack it on the Pirates, though. Newman is the platonic ideal of the last infielder on the bench. Is he a good fielder? He’s alright for a shortstop. Is he a good hitter? No. Can he play the middle infield competently when your starters are having a day off, and maybe sub in defensively for a bat-first option? Indubitably. That’s not the role he has here, though, and his career suggests he’s ill-suited for the one he does.
Cincinnati hopes that he’ll merely be a stopgap. Barrero looked like he might seize the job for good after tearing up Triple-A in 2021, but he had a historically futile offensive season in the bigs last year, and his minor league performance wasn’t much better. That’s poured cold water on his projections, though I’d give him plenty of chances to redeem himself if I were the Reds. The young guard is nipping at his heels, too: De La Cruz is our no. 6 overall prospect, while Noelvi Marte and Edwin Arroyo, the two players the team got back in the Luis Castillo trade, give them an enviable minor league shortstop pipeline. The future is bright here. The present? Not so much.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Despite the Angels claims of solving the “depth” issue, their new additions to the infield didn’t really add any premiere talent. So no matter who’s playing the results should be about the same.
Lol, did you miss the 600 combined plate appearances from Velazquez and Duffy last year? The Angels were 29th in SS wRC+ and 30th in 3B wRC+.
LOL. Then why did they invite Velasquez to Spring Training? Phillips is this year’s Duffy. Rendon has the mobility of a guy who had a hip procedure.
So maybe this year they end up 20th and 25th at those spots instead?
Not really something to get super excited about. Pretty much anyway you slice it, the angels infield has a 75+% chance of being terrible again
I don’t think anybody is claiming they’ll have a top tier infield, but they actually have decent depth for once.
If you need any more proof than this statement:, “If you think of an average player as one who accrues roughly 2 WAR per 600 plate appearances, 29 teams are above average at shortstop. That’s because everyone puts their best athletes there for as long as they can, which results in an embarrassment of positional riches.” that the positional adjustments are wrong and need to be recalculated. I don’t know how to help you *gestures in the general direction of sabermetricians everywhere*
I disagree with this. Imagine a world with 30 good players and 240 (all the other positions combined) bad players. If you put all those 30 at one position, that position should have more WAR than all the others. If you’re adjusting all the positions to force them to be equal, you’re going to get that world wrong.
I agree with Ben. While I think positional adjustments may need to be revisited, there is a lot of value to be gained/lost at SS. Having better defenders there, especially those that can hit, is going to lead to having a lot of above average players at one position. Pena is essentially an average hitter (below average OBP, above average power) regardless of position, but Astros still being 19th, despite having one of the better fielders in the game, is proof that there is a disporportionate amount of talent at SS.
That’s a fair counter point but a fair number of these players belong in the second group. You’re not going to convince me that Orlando Arcia, Nick Ahmed, or David Fletcher are “good” players just because a team sticks them at short stop when they are much closer to replacement level. Arcia for example has accrued 0.55 war/162 in 4 full seasons of playing time. That’s a replacement level player with a 1.5 war projection of which about half of that is from the positional adjustment alone. The adjustments are almost a decade and a half old at this point and don’t take into account the adjustments teams have made playing larger better hitting players at SS.
All of this is ignoring the fact that there are many more good players in the upper minors than there were even 10 years ago. The replacement level bar is much higher now as well.
Adjustments playing larger, better hitting players there? That’s been happening way longer than you’re implying. Ripken, A-Rod, Nomar, Miguel Tejada…the days of teams only playing slapdick guys there ended in the 80s
As someone who started watching MLB in the 90s I very much disagree with this. For the most part teams very much played the “all glove no offense” guys at shortstop. Yeah there are exceptions, and obviously your A-Rod Nomar Jeter types are stars, but back the number of SS back then who could hit above league average were few and far in between.
Just arbitrarily looked up year 2000 qualified SS list. By wRC+ only 7 shortstops were above average. 7th best hitter that year was Ricky Gutiérrez with 104 wRC+. In 2022 15 SS hit above average. And the 7th best last year was Dansby Swanson with 116 wRC+.
The position has absolutely changed greatly since the analytics movement.
I would say it changed at least partly because A-Rod and Nomar got front offices to say “hey, maybe we can have it all!” But maybe that was analytics too.
In any case, I strongly agree with your point about shortstops in the 90s. There is a reason why Omar Vizquel was seen as the platonic ideal of a shortstop. Guys like Greg Gagne and Royce Clayton were the good versions of this archetype. The bad ones were guys like Gary diSarcina, Ozzie Guillen…and those were the good ones.
Yeah man, I was there. The John Smoltz’s of that era couldn’t stop talking about how the game was changing because teams were letting those guys play SS now
There are a lot of guys currently playing the position who would be 3Bs, 2Bs or OFs 20 years ago. Maybe the shift ban will start to push some of them in that direction soon.
I don’t see why the adjustments should take into account playing better players at SS. Playing better players at SS should cause there to be more value at SS than previously.
On Arcia, he has a good projection because the projection seems to value his batting in 2022 a lot more than 2019. If he hits like his career averages, he’s going to produce a lot like his 0.55 WAR/162, but that has nothing to do with positional adjustment.
Personally, I suspect the positional adjustment for 2B has been too high relative to SS, and 3B’s positional adjustment has been too low relative to SS. Shortstops (at least the most of them) tend to provide a lot of value while at SS, or the Padre way…all over the place. CF is another place that provides a lot of value such that below average hitters can be 2-WAR players (assuming 1000 WAR leaguewide).
On replacement level in general, I suspect it should rise over time. That said, the easily acquired players (e.g., Rule 5, DFAs) that can be used as replacements has not gotten much better in the past 6-7 years as the great teams have gotten better at controlling talent such that they have huge stockpiles of players in the minors that are better than replacement players. I suspect in a few years assuming baseball trends towards parity again, actual replacement players (e.g., DFA and Rule 5 players and not 0 WAR players) will have WAR rise over 0 by a bigger margin if WAR continues to be set at 1000.
I agree with your premise…but these FGDC projections are deeply funky.
Projecting Oneil Cruz as a better defensive SS than Tim Anderson is absurd.
Prima Facie.
This hits one of the major problems I have with WAR. It exemplifies the fact that WAR is a measure of individual performance and ignores the far more important fact that this is a team game. The way I see it each player should be measured against only the other players at the same position. Simply said, if a SS is the 25th best SS, even if he has a 3WAR, he is hurting his team relative to those teams who have a better SS. Each position should be evaluated separately from each other. All positions should be added or subtracted from the median, #16 in this case, and the cumulative total from these comparisons used to measure a teams strength. For example Paul Goldschmidt is the #2 1st baseman and the #16 is Rowdy Tellez, That is quite a gap but the #2 SS is Carlos Correa and the #16 SS is Tim Anderson. There is a much, much smaller gap in value. If everybody has a good or better SS then there is not a lot of value there but if there are only a few highly valued 1st basemen then there is a lot more value in having a top 5 1st baseman than a great SS but WAR devalues the position so much that it gives a distorted picture of team strength .
CJ Abrams just posted a 71 wRC+ and a .266 xwoba with a 2% walk rate. If that gets a 2 WAR projection, then I’d probably get a 2 WAR projection for standing at SS and doing nothing.
There is something so very off about these projections and positional adjustments. I can’t take the WAR amounts seriously.
I’ll take the under on your 71 wrc+
I never said I had to hit well. Clearly Abrams demonstrated that hitting is optional if you just want a 2 WAR projection.
But I think I’d get a higher walk rate by sheer chance if I just stood there holding the bat. It’s hard to have a sub 2% walk rate.
Your issue is with the batting projections, not the WAR positional adjustments. If he runs a .301 wOBA, he will most likely be a 2 win player. I don’t think that’s unreasonable.
I think the issue is more with WAR overrating defense and baserunning in general. Someone who hits as poorly as Abrams shouldn’t be considered a league average player unless he’s one of the top defenders (and not just among shortstops) in the game, the kind of guys who will win at least a handful of Gloves Gloves and maybe a Platinum Glove or more in their careers.
Your WAR projection would be so low the computer wouldn’t be able to calculate it.
CJ is 22. He should improve on both sides of the ball for until he is 25 on average.
Don’t know about the math, but there is a definite Lake Wobegon vibe for these posts. Cannot comment on accuracy, but I have to say from a narrative perspective every team basically having an average or above average player at almost every position is not so great.
It’s Wins Above Replacement, not Wins Above Average.
Teams have to be pretty poorly run to have as their regular starter a veteran, getting paid veteran money, when they could get as good or better from a random Quad-A guy.
It used to happen a lot more often. Part of the sabermetric revolution is that it doesn’t really. Does that mean that you’d rather see WAA now?
*cough* Rockies catcher *cough*
Although, that’s just further proof of how poorly the Rockies are run.
CJ is 22. He should improve on both sides of the ball every year until he is 24 or 25 on average.
No, the problem is that these projections are just too high. On this one, and all the other ones. Something is up–the top 20-25 teams all feature an “average” or better situation, and the ones at the top are further away from the mean than the ones at the bottom.
I’m not sure why this is and I’d like to know. But the projections are just way too optimistic about everyone. I think we’ve figured out that part of it is that this isn’t “normed” in the same way as the actual performance. It’s also possible that whatever data is getting fed into ZiPS and Steamer is sufficiently different from the data is was trained on and it’s just giving us weird output as a result.
One problem seems to me to be on the defense side where the default seems to be near “0” when the player doesn’t have much of a track record. Also the number doesn’t seem to vary much when the player appears at more than one position. I’m not sure how scouting reports fit into defensive projections but maybe they should be given more weight.
3 WAR is the new 2 WAR!
Here’s another thought: Maybe there’s something weird going on with changes for the offensive environment. If someone regularly hit 30 homers and the home run rate goes down by 25%, do the projections know about the change in the offensive environment? And how is that adjusted for WAR? If only one of those two things gets addressed this could get pretty weird.
Not sure if you saw my latest reply to you on this over on the Second Base page (this is a slightly edited version and I think fits with what Ivan_Grushenko is saying):
———-
As I look at this, I wonder if this issue is that basically no one is projected to produce negative WAR. Just looking at Cleveland, there are only two players (both pitchers) who are projected for negative WAR (with both of them at -0.1).
But in reality. lots of players produce negative WAR. Again, looking at Cleveland, they had 12 position players last year who produced negative WAR (total of -4.6). And they had another 8 pitchers produce negative WAR (-2.8).
Some of those players were expected to be good (Franmil Reyes), some were fringe players (Ernie Clements), and some weren’t expected to play last year but were forced into action (Kirk McCarty).
Still, this doesn’t explain why the overall projection is roughly correct for pitchers while it’s 40% too high for hitters. This should effect both of them so I’m still a bit confused.
Projections are the 50th percentile outcome. The negative WAR results tend to come from lower percentile outcomes.
If a player’s 50th percentile is negative? They probably aren’t in the big leagues.
Right. In general, it wouldn’t make sense to project someone on a MLB roster (particularly at the beginning of the season) to have negative WAR. If a guy is expected to be below replacement level, teams will look for someone to “replace” them.
But obviously things happen. Guys have bad seasons, guys play who weren’t expected to play, or sometimes they have limited playing time which leads to high variability in outcome.
Still, I’m stuck on the fact that all of the “overprojection” is on the hitting side and none of it is on the pitching side.
As I pointed out in the catcher article, last year there was 569.8 hitting WAR and 430 pitching WAR. Depth Charts is projecting 808.7 hitting WAR and 421.1 pitching WAR for 2023. So the pitching WAR is in line with what you would expect. But the hitting WAR is 41.9% higher than last year.
…but in what world is 3.0 WAR the “50th Percentile Outcome” for Amed Rosario, haha?
He’s a 27 year old whose career high WAR is 2.4
Besides, that goes both ways. Most of the players who wind up having monster seasons of 7+ WAR aren’t projected as doing so before the season starts. You have to have a nearly Pujolsian level of superstar consistency for the projections to actually buy into it.
I suspect the projections are high because they are median projections. The problem with median projections is that guys get hurt way more than guys hit their ceilings. I think projections are tuned to be right on a player basis as often as possible with projections being way off on players with injuries that severely affect playing time and/or performance.
Projections do not seem to be tuned such that the league wide WAR is 1000. Right now, league-wide WAR appears to be about 23% high (i.e., 1230 WAR projected). The 23% seems a little high, but expect injuries will takle care of about 2/3s of the reason they are high.
The Astros projected dropped significantly at 2B with Altuve’s injury. Ditto for Mets at RP (edit, please don’t take this an attack towards the WBC…it is just that the attacks on the WBC make these the 1st two injuries that come to mind). The better players just aren’t going to play as much as projected, but it is matter of who the baseball gods frown upon this year regarding injuries.
Yeah, this is right. In the comments on every single one of these position-specific posts someone tries to argue about the positional adjustments. The positional adjustments aren’t the problem, the projections are. It’s not actually hard to commensurate the shortstops and the left fielders, it’s hard to tell who’s actually good when you’re rating 15 of the starters at every position as a near-All Star-level talent.
I mean, I do think that the positional adjustments need to get looked at again, because it does seem like the 1B/DH adjustments are pretty brutal and we’re not giving nearly as much credit to CF defense in comparison to 2B/3B/SS. And because they are a little on the arbitrary side. But the point of positional adjustments is correct and our understanding of value is far, far more accurate with them than without.
I certainly think the positional adjustments should be re-computed every year on a rolling 10-year average basis or something approximately like that. It’s a weird artifact of these systems still being relatively new that they have fixed values like these hard-coded in, when they should be treated more like a pension treats its cost-of-living adjustment, and reevaluated annually. But this kind of modest tinkering is very rarely what the commenters seem to want.
Not to mention that the DH penalty has been proven to exist, haha!
B-Ref bases their position adjustment on real team $/WAR payments.
A lot of the defensive projections are genuinely silly.
Oneil Cruz put up -8 Fld in his first 80 games at SS.
This year, they project him to put up -2 in 130 or so games.
ezequiel tovar is projected for 2.7 WAR. last year kyle schwarber hit 46 home runs and posted a 128 wrc+, good for 2.6 WAR. Who would you rather have on your team?
Schwarber at SS would be fun to see, and maybe the Phils would have tried it if Trea had signed elsewhere.
I would take the guy who actually gave me 2.6 fWAR rather than the promise of someone who projected for 2.7 fWAR.
Especially since something is up with the projections right now, but even then…I mean, it’s like asking Astros fans if they would trade last year’s championship for a projection of winning it all this year. Of course not!
Not “Blank Space” catching strays on FanGraphs!
I assume the top 3 are Style, Wildest Dreams, and…I Know Places?
I thought about this a long time! I have Wildest Dreams, How You Get The Girl, and Clean as my top 3. Honestly, the entire album is incredible though. There’s no wrong ranking (except Welcome to New York).
I have NEVER understood why Welcome to New York exists, other than to be played incessantly on TaxiTV for a few months in 2015.
Aside from that, yes, 100% bangers and the best pop album for the millennial generation.
Hmm. I’ve always been partial to Lorde’s Pure Heroine.
Not a *bad* choice, but I’ll argue that she’s actually Gen Z and that Olivia Rodrigo holds the title belt there.
Whereas Fangraphs is a baseball website; and
Whereas Lorde wrote a song titled “Royals” which is on the album “Pure Heroine”; and
Whereas “Royals” was written by Lorde after being inspired by a 1976 photo of George Brett in a Royals uniform signing baseballs; and
Whereas Olivia Rodrigo has never written a baseball related song;
Now, therefore, be it resolved: that Lorde’s Pure Heroine gets the title belt.
Speak Now>>>1989.
Max Martin and Shellback scrubbed out everything interesting about her sound.
I am neither a Taylor Swift fan nor a Taylor Swift hater, but I did find it validating when I discovered everyone else hears “something something Starbucks lovers” in that song too. Did no one listen to that before it was sent out? Or did they decide that what the song really needed to get over the top was a “hold me closer Tony Danza” situation?
Okay I re-listened to the whole album while writing today and Out of the Woods is incredible too.
Edit: And all you had to do was stay too!
All you had to do was stay might be the best song on the album.
I used to work at a restaurant whose playlist had a lot of Taylor Swift and if you just go by popularity I would say Wildest Dreams, Style, and Shake it off along with Blank Space to be the Big-4 of the album.
Gotta admit that album’s big 4 should be up there even historically speaking.
The depth is even more when one considers that the Padres have SS at several other positions
“Hey if all the shortstops project for like 2.5 WAR or better, then let’s just put them uuuurvrywhere!”
This is what happens when your GM doesn’t understand the Erick Aybar Zone.
Indeed not only “Bogaerts is the fourth-best of the four marquee shortstops to hit free agency in the past two years,”
but Bogaerts is the fourth-best of the four marquee shortstops on the Padres.
He’s more like #3 out of 5, ahead of Cronenworth and Kim but behind Machado and Tatis Jr. But defensively…IDK man, I don’t really trust him to keep doing what he did last year even if Machado and Kim will help him a lot.
I’m interested to see if CF keeps Tatis healthy.
CJ Abrams being worth 2.1 War this year is pretty good. More than i was hoping. That gives me more hope he become a star in his mid to late 20s.
This is actually pretty good evidence that the projections are too high.
I know his defensive metrics weren’t great last season, but I think has the ability to be an elite defensive shortstop who can hit about league average. I don’t know if that happens this year given his lack of professional experience, but I feel better about him than swing at everything Luis Garcia.
The Reds being last at SS and 1B is rough.
Elly will save them at SS
fingers crossed Franco has a healthy season. Would love to see him walk more this year
Man oh man, if Rosario, Hernandez, Witt, and Cruz are all 3 win players…that would be something, but I don’t think it’s likely. And Bichette and Franco get pretty optimistic projections too. And Abrams. I get some of these guys are going to meet these projections but something is off because I sincerely doubt these can be all defended as average projections…
Another bit of evidence that something is off with the projections this year.
I’m genuinely confused by this. Isn’t this logical? Shouldn’t the position where a player can contribute the most value be the position which has the most number of players above average?
Rosario’s 27 years old.
He’s played in 4 full major league seasons.
His career high is 2.4 WAR.
His career high WAR/650 is 2.65 WAR
If your projection system thinks his median outcome is 3.0 WAR in 630 PA, you need to check your projection system.
This is it. These projections are too high.
I know that it probably wouldn’t pull the Reds out of the basement, but the local writers I trust the most (C Trent at The Athletic especially) assume Barrero will begin the season as the starter, not Newman.
If Lindor has been better than Turner the last couple of years I need to stop watching MLB cause I AM CLUELESS..
So annoyed about how the Braves botched this position. Essentially they threw a silent tantrum about being unable to execute their preferred strategy of doing a below-market extension or sign a veteran on a very short deal and so allowed four great options who were available for nothing but money pass them by. Now they’re stuck with a no-upside journeyman and two prospects who are probable busts. Argh!
don’t worry they’ll be fine.
Yes, overall they’ll probably be fine, but it was a completely avoidable error.
I understand why AA did this. For the Braves, Dansby wasn’t worth the money he was asking for.
The internal options the Braves had were thought to be sufficient, and they probably are good enough, with everyone else they have signed. Last year did reveal the lack of depth the Braves lack in middle infielders, and that has caused them to make a variety of moves which help shore up that depth, but don’t really provide a long term solution.
Ehire Adrianza showed up to camp with an NRI and won the backup infielder’s job. He won Orlando Arcia’s job. Arcia is under contract, Grissom and Shewmake both have options, so Arcia gets the shortstop job because the Braves don’t eat money on contracts unless they absolutely have to.
That said, the season is long, guys will get injured, and odds are that Grissom is up to stay later this year, probably in June, which will have absolutely nothing to do with service time manipulation. Probably.
I find it funny when the Dodgers get players who were non-prospects to become valuable players out of nowhere, they get credited for great player development. When the Cardinals do it, it’s Devil Magic. The media narratives around the Cardinals gets tiresome.
The “joke” about so-called Devil Magic has been going on for 15 years. Best get used to it. At this point it’s obviously not going away — which is great news, because it’s so funny and so insightful at the same time.
So we’re 5 positions into the series now, and the number of teams at or above the “average” 2.0-WAR projection at each position are:
28 c, 21 1b, 28 2b, 28 3b, 29 ss
if you want to slide the cutoff to 2.3 to adjust 2.0WAR/600 for groups getting up to 700 PA, the number of above-average projections are still:
28 c, 17 1b, 24 2b, 25 3b, 29 ss
are we getting the worst outfields in the history of baseball to balance this out or is something just miscalibrated?
It’s not so much a miscalibration as a conscious playing time decision. These guys won’t all be healthy all year. That’s going to lower every single group’s WAR. Worse players pick up the slack, and so on. We don’t hard-force the league into exactly 1000 WAR in preseason projections, so if our playing time projections overweight stars relative to how often they’ll actually play (and they always always do), there will be more WAR to go around in these power rankings exercises than actually exists.
Doesn’t that imply that your playing time estimates (collectively) are above the median outcome? If you have 10 players and know in advance that 9 will have 600 PA and 1 will have 0 PA due to injury, isn’t it prudent / accurate to project each for 540 PA?
Eh, I think it really comes down to what you want to use these projections for. They’re mostly for seeing what each team will look like at full strength, which they do an excellent job capturing. They also feed well into playoff odds, because it’s not a big deal if we’re a little over on everyone. You can see that ZiPS playing time projections are lower than Depth Charts ones. I’m not convinced that either is “right” per se. They’re just out to do different things.
My main issue with the projections is that the Fld projections seem to have exactly zero relationship to the players’ historical Fld performances.
Over his career, Lindor has put up 13 Fld/150.
The FG projections cut that in half, while Oneil Cruz’s career -15 Fld/150 is expected to improve by a factor of 5.
Cruz should get better. He is very young. Lindor should get a tiny bit worse because of his age. Makes sense to me.
The issue isn’t necessarily the direction.
It’s the magnitude that fails the smell test.
I’m not entirely sure how Fangraphs does their replacement calculations, but Baseball Reference puts their full-season replacement adjustment at ~26 runs, meaning that a player with 162 games and an average WAR production (Wins Above Average of 0.0) would come out to roughly 2.6 bWAR. I don’t know if they scale everything to 1000 bWAR total, but figuring an offensive component of 9 players totaling 23.4 bWAR, that leaves 9.9 bWAR for pitching staffs, which seems a little low (perhaps off by a couple of wins). Maybe this is part of why there is a disconnect here.
As for whether the outfield is bad comparatively, last year’s Wins Above Average By Position chart on B-R has the shortstop position league-wide at a full win above average, higher than any other spot. The outfield was not particularly good, with CF at +0.4, RF at -0.1, & LF at -0.5 (DH is also at -0.5).
It is interesting that the primarily offensive-minded positions, 1B, LF, RF, & DH, are all considered to be below average and the defensive-minded positions except for catcher (2B, 3B, SS, CF) are all above; Fangraphs adds the framing component for backstops, which is considered a plus across the league and pulls the position into the black. Maybe there is some validity to reassessing the positional adjustments in WAR calculations.
At least in regard to your first point, BRef and FanGraphs agreed upon a unified replacement level a decade ago.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/unifying-replacement-level/
Anderson is probably the best bet to exceed his projection if he is healthy. I get that the model will never believe Anderson’s BABIP is sustainable, even if he maintains it till he is 40, and that it doesn’t like his low walk rate, but his WAR/600 for his career is 3.5 and he is 29 years old, not 35. Heck, even when his BABIP was a career low .289 in 2018, he still put up 2.5 WAR in 606 PA.
I think I’d take Pena (he looked like a different guy in the playoffs), but Anderson is a perfectly cromulent choice.
Also, the Fld component is clearly banjaxed.
J.P. Crawford started 2022 hot, and then didn’t hit at all for something like the last 4 months of the season, while playing mediocre defense. I agree that he’ll almost definitely be fine, but it is why the Ms faithful were willing to move on–or rather move him to 2b–this offseason. (Additionally, SS is where the best Free Agents were available this offseason.)
I was surprised that Trevor Story was mentioned as the Red Sox SS if he didn’t have surgery. The truth is, he had to have surgery!! It is very difficult to accurately evaluate a player without seeing him play, and play a lot. Story played a tremendous 2nd base for the Red Sox last year, when he was not injured, but it didn’t require a trained eye to see how difficult it was for him to throw. He got the job done, range and hands were super, but he struggled to make strong throws on DP opportunities and, in general, never showed any arm strength. Story will never be the every day SS for the Red Sox and all the eggs are in Marcelo Mayer’s basket right now which is is not news to anyone.
Wander Franco=THe most overrated player in MLB. Has done nothing. Won’t get more than 3 war