A Contact Wizard Is Here to Help the Red Sox and Their Outfield

Gather ‘round the fireplace, dear FanGraphs readers, because today I want to tell you a story. Ye be warned: It’s not for the faint of heart, and it’s probably more appropriate for Halloween night. But a little bit of spookiness never hurt the Christmas spirit — just ask Tim Burton. Here is the outfield depth chart for the Red Sox before they signed Masataka Yoshida:

Scary, huh? Enrique Hernández and Alex Verdugo are good — it’s the individuals behind them that create the horror. Jarren Duran here is like butter scraped over too much bread (which, from the butter’s perspective, has to be a pretty gruesome experience). Then there’s Hoy Park and Wilyer Abreu, who shouldn’t be getting big slices of the outfield pie on a supposedly contending team. Rob Refsnyder did put up a 146 wRC+ out of nowhere this season (in 57 games), but, c’mon. Yoshida’s arrival doesn’t alleviate the Red Sox’s shallow depth. But he is something they desperately needed: a fixture in left field.
The deal, as reported by Jeff Passan, is for five years and $90 million, with a posting fee of $15.4 million bringing the total to $105.4 million. Since the posting fee is a lump sum excluded from payroll calculations, the AAV of Yoshida’s contract is $18 million. It’s a million more than Seiya Suzuki’s contract just a year prior, and a comparison between the two outfielders is unavoidable.
In most aspects, Suzuki comes out on top. Looking at their NPB resumes, Suzuki’s career high in ISO is .322; for Yoshida, it’s .232. Suzuki has multiple seasons of double-digit stolen bases; Yoshida has zero. Suzuki is a competent corner outfielder; Yoshida has largely been relegated to left field. Suzuki’s big-league debut came in his age-27 season, whereas Yoshida will already be 29 when he first dons a Red Sox uniform. And as Kiley McDaniel documented for ESPN, scouts’ and executives’ evaluations of the deal aren’t very flattering, to say the least. It’s not that Yoshida is a bad player, but the Red Sox blew every projected offer out of the water, even if one accounts for just how bonkers the free agent market has been.
But the goal here isn’t to save money, nor is it to beat another Japanese outfielder who signed last year in terms of contract value. The Red Sox had a gaping hole in left, and their zeal netted them a perfect fit. So let’s talk about what Yoshida brings to the table. Depending on which baseball database you consult – Delta Graphs or NPB Stats – Yoshida had either the second- or third-highest WAR among all NPB position players. The slashline behind it is beautiful: .335/.447/.561, a culmination of 508 masterful plate appearances. As you might have guessed based on those numbers, his strength lies in a tremendous feel for contact and a zen-like approach at the plate. In 2022, Yoshida had the second-lowest strikeout rate among qualified NPB batters. He also had the second-highest walk rate among them. “Never whiffin’, always walkin’” – that’s Yoshida’s motto.
It’s no wonder then that former teammate Adam Jones dubbed Yoshida a “Japanese Juan Soto.” Plate discipline transcends borders, and a player who seldom chased outside the zone in Japan will likely do the same in the States. Plus, Yoshida’s bat-to-ball skills should be good enough to mitigate the inevitable uptick in swings and misses. The successes of Yoshi Tsutsugo and Shogo Akiyama were contingent on quick adjustments to the majors, but Yoshida is a complete hitter as is. In other words, the chances of him totally flopping seem miniscule.
That said, his ceiling will be contingent on his results on balls put in play – and that’s significantly harder to project. Right off the bat, there’s no publicly available batted ball data for Japanese pro ball other than rudimentary fly ball or line drive rates. The absence of exit velocity makes it difficult to determine whether Yoshida’s hits came via his bat speed, or a knack for finding holes in the infield. Not that the latter isn’t valuable, but it’s a less reliable option for two reasons: Defense is better optimized in the majors, and Yoshida will naturally have a harder time making contact. Ichiro is so ingrained in baseball culture, we sometimes forget he’s the exception, not the rule.
Also, until Yoshida begins playing for the Red Sox, there will be things we simply won’t know. The biggest concern about players from Asian leagues is whether they can handle high velocity, which is prevalent throughout the majors. To give you an example, Jung Ho Kang and Ha-Seong Kim had similar KBO careers before joining the Pirates and Padres, respectively. Both were one of the top offensive shortstops in Korea, and both were asked the same question: “Can he hit a proper fastball?” Kang, in his rookie season, recorded a .509 wOBAcon against fastballs 95 mph or above. Kim excelled as well, putting up a .422 wOBAcon. In fact, his disappointing debut stemmed from an inability to square up non-fastballs. You can (and should) expect NPB and KBO hitters to experience a decline in their numbers. But expecting them to have issues with specific pitch types is not only misleading, but often entirely inaccurate.
Whether Yoshida will crush fastballs or whiff through them is anyone’s guess. One last thing I’ll add about his offensive potential is that he accumulated gaudy numbers in a pitcher-friendly environment. Yoshida played for the Orix Buffaloes, whose home park has the second-lowest run scoring factor and the fourth-lowest home run factor, per the five-year regressions from NPB Stats. The Buffaloes belonged to the Pacific League, which has a higher level of pitching talent than its counterpart, the Central League. Yoshida was a good hitter in spite of where he played, not because of it.
Maybe that’s part of why ZiPS’ outlook on Yoshida is rosy. Here’s what the projection system sees him averaging for the next five years:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | + | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | .305 | .372 | .489 | 505 | 70 | 154 | 29 | 2 | 20 | 76 | 51 | 62 | 3 | 131 | 0 | 2.8 |
| 2024 | .298 | .367 | .474 | 496 | 68 | 148 | 28 | 1 | 19 | 73 | 51 | 61 | 3 | 125 | 0 | 2.4 |
| 2025 | .292 | .361 | .456 | 480 | 64 | 140 | 26 | 1 | 17 | 68 | 49 | 59 | 3 | 119 | 0 | 1.9 |
| 2026 | .288 | .359 | .452 | 458 | 60 | 132 | 25 | 1 | 16 | 63 | 47 | 57 | 2 | 118 | -1 | 1.7 |
| 2027 | .283 | .351 | .439 | 428 | 54 | 121 | 23 | 1 | 14 | 56 | 43 | 54 | 2 | 112 | -1 | 1.3 |
And here are the percentile projections for 2023:
| Percentile | 2B | HR | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 40 | 31 | .357 | .430 | .595 | 174 | 5.8 |
| 90% | 38 | 29 | .344 | .410 | .571 | 160 | 4.7 |
| 80% | 35 | 25 | .332 | .397 | .537 | 148 | 3.9 |
| 70% | 32 | 23 | .322 | .388 | .516 | 141 | 3.5 |
| 60% | 30 | 22 | .313 | .379 | .500 | 135 | 3.1 |
| 50% | 29 | 20 | .305 | .372 | .489 | 131 | 2.8 |
| 40% | 27 | 19 | .298 | .362 | .476 | 125 | 2.4 |
| 30% | 26 | 17 | .288 | .354 | .463 | 120 | 2.0 |
| 20% | 24 | 16 | .277 | .343 | .447 | 111 | 1.4 |
| 10% | 22 | 13 | .261 | .327 | .423 | 101 | 0.7 |
| 5% | 20 | 12 | .252 | .318 | .398 | 95 | 0.2 |
From ZiPS’ point of view, the difference between Suzuki and Yoshida is minimal. Initially, it saw Suzuki putting up 11 WAR across five years, a total that isn’t far off from the 10.1 WAR assigned to Yoshida. A sharper decline shows up in Yoshida’s projection, though, reflecting his elder status. ZiPS is also surprisingly optimistic about Yoshida’s glove, which I didn’t anticipate – his defensive shortcomings are what made many skeptical of the left fielder, but even a neutral amount of defensive runs saved would be a boon to the Red Sox.
What’s really interesting are those percentile projections. Yoshida’s 95th percentile 2023 season is ridiculous. A .357 batting average? Thirty-one home runs? It’s a season that would be enshrined in baseball lore. But that lofty high comes with a miserable low: In the worst-case scenario, ZiPS sees Yoshida slashing .252/.318/.398. If you thought the variance is higher than usual, you’d be right. As we explored earlier, there’s so much to consider and so much we don’t know when it comes to translating numbers from foreign leagues. The variety of outcomes generated by ZiPS is reflective of that hassle. A predictable set of outcomes (like flipping a coin) produces a narrow distribution; an unpredictable set of outcomes (like Yoshida’s MLB career) produces a wide distribution, ranging from a 95 OPS+ to a 174 OPS+.
Even so, the uncertainty doesn’t change who Yoshida is. Based on everything available on him, he looks like the next Andrew Benintendi: a contact-oriented hitter with doubles power, an excellent feel for the strike zone, and acceptable defense in left field. On a purely dollars-per-WAR basis, $105 million isn’t a bargain; a total of around $90 million, including the posting fee, would have been more appropriate. But look, $15 million isn’t going to run the Red Sox into the ground, nor should it prevent them from making upgrades. On the more important construct-the-best-roster-possible basis, Boston’s decision to sign Yoshida is justified. The risk involved in signing a player from a foreign league doesn’t change the fact that the Red Sox have a dilapidated outfield. Rebuilding it is now an easier task with Yoshida secured in left. When one player can provide that kind of impact, you bring him onto your team.
Justin is an undergraduate student at Washington University in St. Louis studying statistics and writing.
Benintendi (the 2023 version) is a decent enough comp, and maybe he is also in line for this type of contract. If the Red Sox brass truly believes they can contend with this current group, it’s not a bad pickup for this season. But if they have to rebuild, this might not the easiest contract to offload.
Rebuilding reams don’t HAVE TO run bargain basement payrolls. It just doesn’t make a lot of financial sense to spend money on a team that isn’t going to win. The BoSox bring in plenty of revenue, however, and if they carry a couple of heavy contracts through a rebuilding phase it isn’t going to prevent their ability to spend more when it’s time to contend again.
I wonder how much Yoshida will DH over the course of this contract, if it is determined he’s a below average left-fielder… Perhaps that is why the execs Kiley McDaniel reported about view this as such an overpay, in spite of what ZIPs projects?
Aren’t pitchers’ parks generally pitchers’ parks because of their large outfields which decrease home runs, but would in theory benefit more of a singles/gap hitter like Yoshida?
Guess what I’m asking is if it’s a possibility that Masataka’s home stadium in Japan actually benefitted his triple slash despite its low run scoring factor?
I’m thinking Mike Greenwell would be a pretty good comp.
I think the Red Sox are banking on variance. There’s a chance he’s way above or way below the projection because he hasn’t played stateside. If he is, then the Red Sox win; and if he isn’t, well, then the contract isn’t big enough to cripple the franchise.
This isn’t how I would have drawn it up, because in reality he does look a lot like Benintendi and I would never spend this much money on him. But in this mad, mad free agency period, it doesn’t look quite as absurd.
They could’ve just paid Xander 7M a year more and got the actual 4-5 win player. I mean Chris Martin is costing them like 9M a year. They couldn’t have just ponied up the extra 7M/yr to keep their star player? Like sure there’s some variance but his poor defense and baserunning drop his ceiling considerably.
The difference is that the Red Sox think the idea of giving out an 11 year contract is madness. Which it is in this case. But I think your broader point still holds—it doesn’t make much sense to hold the line on Bogaerts so firmly if you’re gonna do stuff like this. And I’m pretty sure if they had approached him with $200M before the Padres got involved it would have played out differently.
All indications are Xander wanted to stay in Boston and it wouldn’t have taken an 11-year contract, which was designed to lower the AAV. Problem is the Red Sox really didn’t seem to want him to stay. One report had their last contract offer was for 6/162. If true, they weren’t serious.
Looking at how they passed on Betts and Xander, is there any chance they’ll pay Devers?
I doubt it. The Red Sox think he will have to move to 1B soon, and they are allergic to super long contracts. I do think there are some questions about his long-term position. But teams will be signing him for his age 27 season. If he performs, he’s in line for a 10+ year, $230M+ deal.
The main question is if they will try to trade him first. I could see the Phillies or Cubs or Rangers trying to trade for him now, and then try to extend him. But the return probably won’t be better than the Mookie Betts deal, even without throwing in David Price’s contract.
That’s pretty much how I looked at it.
~15-18 aav would get you a Haniger/Benintendi in free agency, fine 2 win players.
They decided instead to roll the dice for Yoshida. Worst case, yeah it’s an expensive 1-2 win player. But if he’s a 130 wRC+ bat, that’s a nicer investment than the Benintendi types
But Haniger or Benintendi wouldn’t have been 5 years into their mid 30s.
Haniger is already 32, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Benny got a 4 year deal
That’s an interesting point. I wonder how the ZiPS percentiles for Benintendi look (loved that addition to this piece).
I would guess his 20th percentile projection is something like 1.6 and his 80th is something like 3. Or something else super boring.
A tertiary benefit of this signing is that Yoshida has been teammates with pitcher Yamamoto for the past few years. Yamamoto is a better prospect than Senga and there’s a good chance he’s posted next season.
Despite their efforts, Boston has struggled luring Japanese players over the past decade due to location, but this may give the Red Sox an edge.
That’s never really played out, meaning Japanese players picking a U.S. team because there’s another Japanese player there already that they know. It usually comes down to money. Also, what happens if Yoshida has a mediocre or worse year for the Red Sox and isn’t happy playing in Boston? It could work just the opposite.
This will likely come down to money. Yamamoto is considered the real deal; a pitcher who could be the #1 in a MLB rotation from day one. Not including Ohtani, who is a special case, Yamamoto will be the most heralded Japanese pitcher since Tanaka. Bidding for Yamamoto will require a 30MM+ AAV. Tanaka had a $22MM AAV a decade back, so Yamamoto bidding probably starts at around 7/240. Will the Red Sox go there?
There’s more that goes into every contract than just money. If you want to get a player who isn’t attracted to your team/ location and want to win with money, you need to blow everyone else away. Turner just turned down a reported extra 40mil to go to the Phillies.
And to your first point: it has been proven, time and again, that Japanese players are more likely to play in west coast cities and/or on teams with other Japanese players (Red Sox and Yankees being the best examples).
You should try using your hands and mouth, because the hot air coming out the other end doesn’t seem to be working for you.
Wow those are beautiful projections. If Yoshida is a 130 wRC+ bat (or, hey, even 120) that’s a nice get.
It’s interesting how there seems to be very different opinions on him though. Eric had him as a 40 FV and the McDaniel piece wasn’t kind, but the projections + salary look more like a 55 FV with perhaps a chance for more
Maybe from a defensive perspective, FV takes a hit. It doesn’t seem like he should be that low.
It’s interesting to compare Yoshida to Suzuki
From a tools perspective Suzuki pretty clearly has him beat. More power, speed, better defender, etc. Yoshida however makes up for it with a 2:1 k/b ratio to Suzukis 1:1
Looking at projections they were about similar, with a slight edge to Yoshida
Suzukis ZIPS from a year ago: 124 OPS+ 2.6 WAR
Yoshida: 131 wRC+ with a 2.8 WAR
What’s interesting though is the perception. Lots of hot takes on Yoshida being an overpay. Maybe a bias towards his size + lack of any elite physical tool?
Also his age and contract into his decline years
Yeah, it’s mainly the physical tools. Suzuki is bigger, has a stronger arm and is faster – so it’s no surprise the scouts liked him much more.
He proved to be solid, but unspectacular, in his first season. Interestingly, his defense on graded out around average, lower than expected given his tools.
Word on the defensive numbers for Yoshida is that he’s actually solid defensively despite the lack of tools.
Yoshida is such a huge gamble, because is he isn’t at least a solid hitter, he’s a total bust.
(And as mentioned elsewhere, the 2 year age difference is big)
Slash lines look awesome, WAR looks comparatively pedestrian. 305/372/489 just feels like it should be better than 2.8 WAR.
Benintendi had 2.8 WAR in 2022 with a 122 wRC+ with slightly better defense so it’s not that ridiculous. I agree it seems low but the 500 PA might be one reason.
Someone is going to be very wrong about this guy. A 35+ FV vs. a 131 OPS is a huge disparity.
Is the age playing a role in terms of the FV?
The timing and the shockingly high contract make me wonder if this was an attempt to compensate for the Bogaerts departure
Seems like $162m for Nimmo would have been a better deal than $105m for Yoshida, but Bloom might have been banking on upside variance.
Nimmo is a nice player but?????? $162M for 8 years seems like a tiny wee bit of an overpay. I just hope Yoshida isn’t the ghost of Rusney Castillo.
It seems to be the years that keep scaring off Bloom. Story @ 6 is the longest he’s given out.
When somebody can show me that there is a way to properly measure defense for a left fielder who plays 1/2 of his games in the tiny little playpen that LF in Fenway is then I will worry about his defense. If he hits he will be fine and at this time there is a gaping hole at DH as well.
Yeah, almost every left fielder at Fenway grades out horribly due to the wall.
But it does help to have a good arm for throwing out runners at 2nd.
I have noticed that playing on the warning track limits your ability to show much range going back on fly balls.
In regards to how Kang and Kim were able to handle increased velocity FBs… I feel like it makes some sense that they had trouble with non-FBs. It seems relatively natural to “gear up” for 98, versus 93 4 seamers, but relatively harder to simultaneously then “gear down” for any breaking ball.
Of course your right. In today’s game the hitters, all hitters and not just the players from Japan and Korea, are sitting ducks for off-speed pitches and breaking stuff. Spencer Torkelson is a good case study. What made everyone think he could hit major league pitching? In 2021 he hit .312 in A, .263 in AA then an anemic .238 in AAA. Off of those numbers the fact that he couldn’t hit his weight seems very logical. Until the game accepts the fact that the velocity at which today’s pitchers are throwing the high hard one is increasing every year the amount of contact will continue to lessen. The feeble attempts being made to try to restore balance are not going to help increase contact rates. Paraphrasing Joey Votto, he said that when he first game up each AB was a chess game and now every AB is a war and that is in a very short period of time when compared to the history of baseball.
Maybe it’s recency bias, but to me “Verdugo is good” is a stretch. Can he even play RF competently?
Maybe he has a peak year coming, which would make sense. But, as sadtrombone says, this feels like the Red Sox trying to bank on variance. Threading the needle down the middle and seeing what happens. Not the worst thing in the world–I mean, it’s what the Rays do. Maybe the Sox build a juggernaut by combining the Rays’ approach with extra spending in the right places. But to me the jury is still way, way out on that one.
I would tend to agree on Verdugo as well. He has not panned out the way many other of us thought he would. He has to either run about a 350 OBP or play plus defense in Fenway’s tough right field, or he’s a 4th OF. I suppose there are worse problems for a team to have, but league average bats with standard corner outfield defense are the sorts of players contending teams have as depth options.
Just a couple of years ago Verdugo was playing competent CF in LA.
The problem is that he came in overweight this year and lost some speed. So it’s an easy fix in theory, I’m just not sure Verdugo will put the time in to fix it.
I hope the dude hits the 95% projections & 110% in games against the Yankees… but I still don’t think I’ll be giving John Henry any more of my own $$$ nor do I think the BoSox’s outfield can cook up anything like the “win, dance, repeat” routine of Benny, JBJ & Betts.
The profile of a contact-heavy lefty plays better in Boston than maybe anywhere else; he should be able to flick oppo fly balls off the Monster with regularity if that bat control is for real.