A Lot Will Depend on Sandy Leon

Sandy Leon was one of the more remarkable stories last season. As Jeff chronicled back in August, Leon took over for the Sox when they really needed a hero. He was that hero, at least for a brief time. He was nothing if not fresh — although that was mostly the result of not having played much at the major-league level previously. Now, he might be one of the most important members of the 2017 Red Sox team.

There are a couple of reasons Leon has become so important. The first and most important is that he has one of the highest (if not the highest) betas on his probable outcomes this season. Is Leon the guy who ran a 158 wRC+ from June to August, or the guy who ran a 44 wRC+ in September (and a 53 wRC+ over the first 107 plate appearances of his career, from 2012 to 2014)? The consensus seems to be something in between, but toward the lower end of that range. ZiPS has him pegged for a 78 wRC+; Steamer, a 74 wRC+ mark. Our depth charts split the difference at 76. The FANS projections are usually wildly optimistic, and that can be useful for players who have odd or small samples or some other manner of extenuating circumstance that might throw off those mean old algorithms. But even the FANS aren’t that optimistic: they have Leon down for just an 80 wRC+.

On the other hand, Leon told Evan Drellich of the Boston Herald recently that when he was signed as a professional, he was signed “because I could hit.” He said that defense was the thing on which he needed to work the most. It’s probably fair to say that, when he was signed, he needed to work on everything. Neither Baseball America nor John Sickels placed Leon among their top-10 Nationals prospect for 2008 — Sickels didn’t have him in his top 20. (Leon signed in 2007, but after both had compiled their Washington lists.) The same was true for the 2009 lists, and by that time, Derek Norris and Adrian Nieto were popping up on the Nats’ lists, so we can’t say that Leon was even the most highly rated catcher in the system.

Still, 2016 wasn’t the first year that Leon was good with the lumber. In 2012, he hit well across four different destinations.

Sandy Leon, 2012 Statistics
Level G PA H AVG OBP SLG wOBA
A- 5 18 5 0.333 0.444 0.467 0.431
AA 40 149 42 0.311 0.358 0.422 0.353
AAA 19 64 18 0.346 0.469 0.558 0.455
MLB 12 36 8 0.267 0.389 0.333 0.334
Total 76 267 73 0.315 0.395 0.444 0.370

Just as in 2016, the sample size wasn’t huge, but it was encouraging. At least at the time. It didn’t hold, of course, and that’s how he came to be a member of the Red Sox organization, where has hit decently in his two stints in Triple-A (101 wRC+ in 2015, 87 in 2016). Now that he’s done it again, we’re left to muse on the possibility of Leon hitting well in consecutive seasons, which is something he has not yet to do in his professional career. (The 2015 season doesn’t really count toward that end. While he hit well enough with Pawtucket, he ran just a 13 wRC+ in 128 PA for Boston. Again, this is why we were all surprised last season.)

If Leon were to hit well again, it would be a pretty big boon for Boston. Even with just a 76 wRC+ and .293 wOBA forecasted in our depth charts, Leon grades out as being worth 1.3 WAR in roughly half a season of playing time. This puts the Red Sox catching corps in the middle of the pack. If he hits like he did last June-August, the Sox could creep toward or into the top 10 overall. Eliminating one of the team’s three offensive question marks/black holes (first and third base being the other two) would go a long way to stabilizing things. It would allow manager John Farrell to use his 13th position-player roster spot however he chose or needed to.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

This is a key element, because the Sox don’t have a lot of wiggle room on the bench. Since they probably are going to be platooning at third base with Pablo Sandoval and Brock Holt, their true bench spots are basically just fourth outfielder (Chris Young) and utility infielder (Marco Hernandez or Josh Rutledge). If Leon doesn’t hit, how long will be it be before the team has to call up Blake Swihart to act as a third catcher and bench bat? And if they need to do that, then they’ll really be walking the tightrope — any injury to an infielder would leave the team perilously thin. That thinness might force the team to expose Leon or Christian Vazquez to waivers, as both are out of options. Or instead of moving on to Swihart, they could just live with subpar offense from Leon and Vazquez. If Mitch Moreland and Pablo Sandoval are also hitting poorly, though, that will be harder to swallow.

In other words, there’s no easy answer for Boston if Sandy Leon doesn’t hit well. And chances are, he won’t. But given the flashes of brilliance he’s shown in the past, there’s a modicum of a reason to hope he can turn opposing pitchers out once again. But if that hope fades and reality sets in, it will likely mark the beginning of a less-than-ideal chain reaction in Boston.





Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
jrubyMember since 2026
9 years ago

so much depends
upon

Sandy
Leon

glazed with boston
dew

beside the green
monster.

(to paraphrase William Carlos Williams)

Baller McCheeseMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  jruby

I have drafted
the catcher
that is on
the BoSox

and which
you were probably
saving
for a later round

Forgive me
I read Fangraphs
so sweet
and so cold

Damaso
9 years ago

If you’re depending that much on Sandy Leon, there’s some serious issues on the roster.

kbn
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

It’s more like so many *outcomes* depend on Leon. Once the Red Sox FO realizes that Leon just got insanely lucky last year, they’ll have to move on. If Vazquez is hitting at that point (unlikely, but you never know), then they’ll just flip them in the depth charts. Otherwise, Leon will get tossed on wavers and Swihart will be back up. I don’t see the Red Sox really carrying three catchers for any appreciable length of time. Holt’s versatility certainly helps with that sort of thing, but it’s not ideal for a team that fancies itself the class of the AL.

The headline is basically a bit misleading. In no way is the season or even the lineup depending on Leon repeating his torrid 2016 summer, it’s just that there are a series of roster changes that will arise when he doesn’t.

Sooted72
9 years ago
Reply to  kbn

yeah really not much at all will depend on sandy leon. he’ll get the first crack at being the everyday catcher which he certainly earned by hitting so well last year. if the magic is gone theyll shitcan him and go with swiihart and/or vazquez.

Mahoney
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Damaso, not sure why you got downvoted for stating the logical upshot of Paul’s concluding sentence.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 years ago

I do not see any platoon at 3rd base for the Sox. Sandoval is a woeful right-handed hitter so there is little to be gained by a platoon. Holt may be hard pressed to see as much playing time as he has in the past which is good for the Sox.

TommyfastballMember since 2016
9 years ago

3 catchers not an option. (Silly to suggest.)

Holt and Sandoval have same strong side. Plus, even if they DID platoon, the other guy is still on the bench.

How many starting catchers does Swihart project better than?

Sox are fine.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Tommyfastball

Depth Charts has Swihart at wRC+ 82. But since he’s had a couple of stints in the majors and run just a little below league average, I’d probably go with that as the likely backup plan. So if Sandy Leon regresses to a slightly below-average hitter, they could replace him with Swihart with the possibility that he’ll get better in the future. That’s not too bad a tradeoff, with the caveat that the guy simply can’t stay healthy.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

Well, it’s pretty obvious that he’s a streaky guy, with his previous BABIP-fueled run going nuts. Still, it’s not clear he’s going to hit any worse than Sandoval who was just. awful. the last time he played. But maybe there’s not as much riding on him because we think Holt will be a better backup? But then that knocks out the utility depth guy. And Hanley/Moreland/Young will cover 1B/DH, and there’s some health issues with Hanley and maybe the others too, plus none of those guys aren’t exactly models of consistency either from year to year at this point in their careers. It sounds like there’s a lot of weird places where lack of depth could hurt the Sox, not just at catcher.

kbn
9 years ago

I honestly think that a lot more is riding on Sandoval than Leon. Even in the worst (well, most likely) case where Leon hits like his old 44 wRC+ self, Swihart is good enough to be the everyday catcher, he just didn’t have the trust of the coaching (and maybe pitching) staff last year. If Sandoval is bad though, it generates a black hole at 3rd base potentially even worse than last year’s, and there’s absolutely no depth with which to fix it. And so while Leon has an easy answer (albeit one which exposes depth to waivers), Sandoval has NO answer.

Honestly, I think that the Red Sox season probably hinges on two things: Sandoval’s play, and the health of the rotation. If the rotation is healthy and Sandoval plays well, it’s hard to see the Sox NOT breezing into the ALDS, even assuming significant regression from everyone else. But if the rotation gets hurt, there is zero depth (as a resident of Colorado, I lost all faith in Kendrick before April 2014 was over), and if Sandoval sucks, the Red Sox are stuck with him.

Fireball Fred
9 years ago
Reply to  kbn

kbn is right. Leon is basically a defensive depth guy who has earned a shot, but the Sox have alternatives. Sandoval is a huge risk with no plausible backup if he fails – Holt’s a short-term fill-in only, and Devers isn’t ready. I’m a bit surprised Swihart hasn’t worked out at 3B this spring.

BenZobrist4MVP
9 years ago

One of the most fascinating things to me about Sandy Leon is his leverage splits. In 2016, he had a -37 wRC+ in 34 high leverage plate appearances, a 134 wRC+ in 95 medium leverage PAs, and a 148 wRC+ in 154 low leverage PAs. I do wonder how much that is random (especially with the relatively small sample sizes) and how much is a true “clutch” factor.