Adam Jones Is Up to Something

Monday afternoon, I participated in an Orioles-centric podcast, where one of the things I was supposed to talk about was Manny Machado. I wrote about Machado a couple of weeks ago, and more specifically, I wrote about him suddenly exercising a lot more patience at the plate. From what we understand about plate-discipline statistics, they find themselves pretty fast. It’s unusual when they move around, so Machado’s change was unusual and worth some attention. He seems to be doing the thing we all want prospects to do, but that they only infrequently pull off.

In advance of the podcast, I thought it would be smart to do a little Orioles research. I know some things about them, but I do not know everything about them, since I’m supposed to keep aware of 30 teams until the passing of the deadline renders a few of them irrelevant. Nobody wants to sound unprepared. I checked in on Machado, to make sure things were still keeping up. I checked in on Steve Pearce, out of offensive and defensive curiosity. And it was while scrolling through pages I noticed something about Adam Jones. Machado, as noted, is showing some weird changes in his plate discipline. Jones is, too, in a different way.

This is nothing new to some of you, but I suppose some of you aren’t all of you. Jones, this year, is still swinging aggressively. He’s still hitting the ball harder than average. He’s still not drawing walks, but he’s still on pace to hit 25 or 30 dingers. Jones, in almost all areas, looks like himself. But all of a sudden, there’s contact. Jones is avoiding whiffs like he hasn’t avoided whiffs.

One way we can look at this: table form. Below, strikeout rates and contact rates, since Jones became a major-league regular:

Season K% Contact%
2008 21% 78%
2009 18% 75%
2010 19% 75%
2011 18% 77%
2012 18% 75%
2013 20% 74%
2014 20% 75%
2015 12% 84%

You’ll notice the consistency. Only one of the seasons shown is partial. In all the other ones, Jones batted more than 500 times, and his strikeout rate fluctuated between 18 – 21% while his contact rate fluctuated between 74 – 78%. Given that background, the change this year appears dramatic. Especially for a player who’s months away from 30. With Machado, you can at least figure that sometimes it just clicks for a 22-year-old. Jones would be tougher to explain. There’s a big change in one place. Not much has changed in other places.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

These are the biggest changes in contact rate between 2014 – 2015:

Espinosa has shown something like this contact skill before, in 2011. Ichiro has a long record of hitting the ball. Granderson used to be about an average contact hitter. Grandal is back to where he used to be. This is the weirdest for Jones. This is the most unprecedented for Jones. Nor does it come with an easy explanation. Last season, Jones ranked in baseball’s 59th percentile in in-play rate. This year, he’s in the top 10%. Have I told you it’s weird? It’s weird.

There is something that might be driving you crazy. So far, we’ve been comparing a partial Jones season to full Jones seasons. That isn’t fair! Full Jones seasons give unusual things time to even out. We can fix that. This year, Jones has played 35 games. So let’s look at 35-game rolling contact rates, going all the way back to 2008. This can tell us whether Jones has ever done something like this before in his career.

adam-jones-rolling-contact-rate

Neat, but, could be more helpful. Let’s truncate that y-axis. It’s a shady thing to do, but only if you don’t call attention to it. I’m calling attention to it. I’m truncating the y-axis! This is what that looks like:

adam-jones-rolling-contact-rate-2

You see a lot of activity around 75% or so. A few peaks jut above 80%. But this current run? By this measure, at least, it’s a career high for Adam Jones. He’s never before had a 35-game contact rate of 84%. Last year he briefly reached 81%. He got up there as well in the middle of 2012. It’s actually an interesting graph — beyond Jones setting a new high, it seems like there’s been more dramatic volatility the last few years of Jones’ career. I don’t know why that would be. I know that baseball is a game of constant adjustments on both sides, but that seems over-simplified.

What’s been demonstrated is that Jones hasn’t done this. Not specifically this. And if you wanted to go a different way, you can calculate that the odds are very low of a player with Jones’ historical contact rate making as much contact as he has over nearly 300 swings. What that validates, I think, is the idea that this is interesting. But it’s ever so much harder to explain. Ultimately, at this point, we’re talking about 25 swings. The difference between old Jones and this Jones is 25 swings that made contact instead of not making contact. What does that mean, really?

A big part of this job — maybe the biggest part of this job — is finding interesting things in the numbers, and writing them up. Often, we’ll focus on players who seem to be making changes, because players are easy to compare against themselves, and change is interesting. Then you get to talk about why the change might be helpful, and you get to speculate on to what degree the player will improve. But if I’m going to be fully honest with you, I don’t know how much else there is to say on this. I don’t know how much I’m supposed to believe in Adam Jones’ new-found contact skill.

It’s unquestionably interesting. It addresses a weakness. Conveniently and curiously, this year the Orioles have a new hitting coach in Scott Coolbaugh. Yet, Jones is 29, and almost 30, and he’s been a good hitter for a while. He’s no less aggressive a swinger than he used to be, so it’s not like there’s a clear improvement with his eye. And I can’t find video evidence of a different swing. Internet searches don’t pull anything up. There’s nothing closely linking Jones and Coolbaugh in a way that would explain a drive for more contact. Everything is practically the same, except for one thing. It’s an important thing, but an awful weird one to just happen.

Which isn’t to say it can’t happen. It can, and maybe it is. But the best explanation I could think of is Jones simply focusing more. And having more of a plan, every time he goes up to hit, and every time he looks for a pitch. Then he might become better at making contact, because he has a better idea of how he’s going to be pitched. It wouldn’t explain why the other plate-discipline numbers haven’t really budged, but this is what I have. Greater swing consistency. Which would make it sort of the hitter equivalent of a pitcher just improving his command. That’s the toughest thing to observe and prove, but it happens for guys, as they ascend to higher levels of performance.

Adam Jones has been up to something. I wish that I could say more. Adam Jones with more contact at the plate would be even more of a star center fielder. Maybe he’d join the game’s elite. I’d sure like to know if he’s getting there. I just don’t have a choice but to wait to find out. Which, I guess, is how it is always.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Orsulakfan
11 years ago

Jones has been intentionally coy about the adjustments he’s been making after working with Coolbaugh, but he has said some things about “hunting fastballs” and ignoring breaking balls early in the count. I am sure that 1) this is easier said than done and 2) whether he is actually doing this could be evaluated by looking at the pitch-by-pitch stats, so I don’t know how much to make of it either. He did rip a first-pitch breaking ball for a 2-run double in the 8th inning on Sunday, so obviously it’s not an absolute. In all, I think that Coolbaugh has helped several Oriole hitters have a better plan when they go up to the plate, understanding patterns in the way pitchers attack them, etc. Maybe it’s sunk in a bit, although the offense has been poor lately.

Statistics don't lie
11 years ago

Wild guesses here: vision correction? unpublicized therapeutic use exemption for Adderall? more practice dedicated to hitting balls outside of the strike zone harder? (since he’s not laying off of them any better – might as well learn to hit them hard more consistently, ala Vlad)

mtsw
11 years ago

Sounds dumb but: did anyone check if Jones had anything done with his literal eyes over the offseason (contact lens prescription, LASIK etc)?

His swing looks more or less the same to me but maybe he’s actually seeing the ball better leading to higher contact rate.

Tank
11 years ago

I remember during an Orioles home broadcast very early in the season, Jones was asked about the changes he’s made at the plate this season that helped lead to his hot start. He said something generic about an adjustment that Coolbaugh had recommended. The broadcast team pushed him for more, but, he refused to say anything else, calling it a secret amongst the two of them. I’m paraphrasing a little bit here, but that interview always struck me as being odd because I’d never seen Jonesy clam up and refuse to answer a pretty simple question like that. I would love to be a fly on the wall during a meeting between Jones and Coolbaugh.

Jim Garman
11 years ago
Reply to  Tank

I saw the same. And it seemed odd at
the time cause Jonesy did not smile either . Dead serious

CS Yankee
11 years ago

I wonder if its because most of the “big” pitchers are gone from the AL East either due to trades, FA or DL.

Price, Lester, Lackey, Moore, Cobb, Tanaka, Hellickson, etc.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  CS Yankee

And on a related note, any time you get to feast on the Jays’ and BoSox decrepit pitching is probably good for the ol’ batting line.

And a quick check does indeed show a slash line of 414/452/621 against Boston and 375/459/750 against Toronto. Getting to tee off on AAA-esque pitching staffs does a good hitter good.

Swfcdan
11 years ago
Reply to  CS Yankee

Good point. There is hardly a good pitcher in the east right now.

*Chris Archer glares*

Andrew A
11 years ago
Reply to  Swfcdan

You forgot to mention the 4th best pitcher in the AL by FIP… the majestic Odor of St Pete.

Nathaniel Dawson
11 years ago
Reply to  CS Yankee

That might be an explanation if most other hitters in the AL East were also experiencing the same kind of spike in contact rate. Are they?

Jason B
11 years ago

That’s a fair point. I was mainly just taking an opportunity to say, man, those teams’ rotations are just gobs and gobs of suck. It’s like eight ounces of suck in a 6-ounce container and some is spilling over the edges, as the container simply cannot contain all of the suck.

Srsly?
11 years ago
Reply to  CS Yankee

Hellickson?1

Dan
11 years ago
Reply to  Srsly?

Moore too. Bit of a reach

Bird's Eye View
11 years ago

As we talked last night on the show, Coolbaugh was projected as being very aggressive based on his time as a hitting coach with the Texas Rangers. The difference in plate approaches from numerous players including Machado, Schoop (prior to injury), and Caleb Joseph has certainly shown early on in the season. Even making something of Jimmy Paredes could be attributed to Coolbaugh or the Orioles magic to turn nothing into something.

However, the plate discipline wouldn’t attribute to contact rate directly unless Jones is working more counts to his advantage and sitting on off-speed pitches.

Gelatinous Cube
11 years ago

Re: working counts…in lieu of a laborious pitch-by-pitch analysis, how hard would it be to just look for a trend in pitches faced per at-bat?

scotman144Member since 2016
11 years ago

Pitches and PA are both listed on his player page. I did some quick and dirty calculations: 3.3 this year, ~3.6 most other years. However if he’s making more contact and swinging just as often this makes perfect sense since more PA’s would end with contact rather than continue with a swing and miss now.

majordanby
11 years ago

maybe the more interesting story is how much volatility there has been in recent years. in addition to setting a career high, he’s also set a career low. what is the volatility like in the late 20’s and early 30’s for players like Jones?

Paul
11 years ago

Quick Question – couldn’t find the answer through the glossary link on the top – it counts as “contact” when a batter hits a foul ball, right?

Schuxu
11 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Well, I guess I should have refreshed one more time…

Captain Tenneal
11 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Yes, it does.

Schuxu
11 years ago

Just out of curiousity and because I can’t find it: How do foul balls factor into contact% ?

Squirrel
11 years ago

His current run doesn’t really seem all that unusual wen you look at previous runs. Slightly different, but mostly the same as points in time before… seems to me this is just Adam Jones in a small sample size.

srock
11 years ago
Reply to  Squirrel

I agree, this pattern is repeating, the contact rate graph shows it. This iteration is more extreme then the previous, but that also looks like the start of a pattern.

In my opinion (and i watch Jones play quite a bit) he is learning how to maximize the hot streak and minimize the slump. This is someting Jones has been doing for several years and it continues to pay dividends.

What throws chaos in the numbers is the amount of time he played through injuries which really put him in some slumps. He stays healthy this year and I predict its his best.

Captain Tenneal
11 years ago

Jeff, any idea what those graphs would look like for Z-contact and O-contact, rather than overall Contact%?

IP3LEE
11 years ago

Prediction: Adam Jones will be the next player suspended for PED use.

300ZXNA
11 years ago

Dammit, Bavasi…

Pedro the Sealion
11 years ago

Truncating the Y axis is standard practice in a lot of professional research, so you shouldn’t feel the need to apologize for it. It makes the chart much clearer by eliminating tons of white space, and I would say it’s actually more misleading to imply 0% is minimum for Adam Jone’s contact %. Practically speaking the minimum is more like 60%, so the second chart was both clearer and more truthful.

Also excellent article as always.

Jason B
11 years ago

Just pre-empting some grousing and hand-wringing, no doubt.

Danny Middaugh
11 years ago

Not sure you could figure it out this way. But could it have to do with the particular pitchers he’s faced in this run?

Scott Marcus
11 years ago

Definitely interesting, and thought-provoking. My guess is that it is noise, and that when you check at the end of the year, Adam Jones contact and K rate will be in line with his other years.

Jeff: try to remember to revisit this at the end of the year, and let us know whether he reverted to his old self. I know that my memory is not good enough for me to look back at Jones in October.

Live Math or Die
11 years ago

Jeff Sullivan, you say it’s shady, and yet you truncate that Y-axis anyways. You rebel, you.

Kris Bryant's Eyes
11 years ago

Does Harang live math?

Jason B
11 years ago

If math tastes like flaming hot Cheetos.

Max
11 years ago

Why don’t k% and contact% add up to 100%? What’s the third option?

Captain Tenneal
11 years ago
Reply to  Max

K% is per plate appearance, contact% is per pitch swung at. Totally different things that should not be summed.

JR Ewing
11 years ago

Both his o-contact and his z-contact are up and the increase in each represents about a 4.5% increase in his total of 9% increase in contact% this year vs 2014. There’s always sample size to worry about, but for established guys I tend to think of increases in z-contact more likely to be skill or approach change than increases in o-contact. I have zero numbers to back that up, but it’s always made sense to me and has seemed to pan out. So unless he’s swinging at less pitches outside of the strike zone, I would bet on that o-contact increase just being luck or a hot streak. At least some of the increase in z-contact may be skill or better approach. Scott Coolbaugh is a baddass, so there’s that.
Looking at his plate discipline, he’s swinging at higher % of pitches outside of the zone and lower % of pitches in the zone, so it’s not like his batting eye has improved.

I think there’s a decent chance he holds on to some of the improved contact in the zone, and the contact outside of the zone normalizes closer to his career.

Ronald D
11 years ago

There’s something to be said for players who finally have a child. Just an idea that floats around the scouting industry.

Swfcdan
11 years ago

“Jones is avoiding whiffs like he hasn’t avoided whiffs.”

Does that actually make any sense?

Nathaniel Dawson
11 years ago
Reply to  Swfcdan

Makes just as much sense as the lyrics of that song from Flahsdance: “She’s a maniac, maniac on the floor. And she’s dancing like she’s never danced before.”

But maybe I should feel good. Most people that have seen me dance say that I dance like I’ve never danced before.

hbar
11 years ago

I’ve seen this before. The oscillations are just due to sunspots and the solar variation.

1908Member since 2016
11 years ago

I’m tempted to cry “small sample size!”, which is perhaps the last refuge of the analytical scoundrel. But let’s assume for the moment that Jones has made an adjustment. If so, it’s a big one.

Jones in 2015 is 57th in contact % (83.5%).

Jones from 2013 to 2015 is 133rd in contact % (75.0).

If I had to shove in a big stack, I’d say that Jones has made adjustments based on how he’s been pitched. In the perpetual sine curve of hitter vs. pitcher, Jones has caught the big wave. Before the Hawaii Five-O theme fades, Jones will be whiffing at something approximating his career rate. If the Orioles are lucky, they’ll already be wearing rings by then.

PackBob
11 years ago

Jeff, if you had truncated the y-axis to 82%, Jones’ contact rate would be off the chart!!

If you had the Orioles-centric podcast last year when Jones had achieved 81%, would you have written the same article, or is the climb to this year’s high necessary? The ascents are similar and, since last year started at a lower point than this year, the amount of change is similar from low to high.

Or, if the timing had been last year (or the year prior; can’t tell) when Jones was at an all-time low near 66%, would the opposite article have been written?

Timing is everything!

peopletocakeratio
11 years ago

not just more contact; more good and less weak contact. some relevant rate stats:

(LD% / GB% / FB%)
2014 — 17.5% / 47.0% / 35.5%
2015 — 21.6% / 41.5% / 33.9%

(soft% / med% / hard%)
2014 — 20.7% / 46.3% / 33.0%
2015 — 11.8% / 56.3% / 31.9%