Adam Jones Is Up to Something
Monday afternoon, I participated in an Orioles-centric podcast, where one of the things I was supposed to talk about was Manny Machado. I wrote about Machado a couple of weeks ago, and more specifically, I wrote about him suddenly exercising a lot more patience at the plate. From what we understand about plate-discipline statistics, they find themselves pretty fast. It’s unusual when they move around, so Machado’s change was unusual and worth some attention. He seems to be doing the thing we all want prospects to do, but that they only infrequently pull off.
In advance of the podcast, I thought it would be smart to do a little Orioles research. I know some things about them, but I do not know everything about them, since I’m supposed to keep aware of 30 teams until the passing of the deadline renders a few of them irrelevant. Nobody wants to sound unprepared. I checked in on Machado, to make sure things were still keeping up. I checked in on Steve Pearce, out of offensive and defensive curiosity. And it was while scrolling through pages I noticed something about Adam Jones. Machado, as noted, is showing some weird changes in his plate discipline. Jones is, too, in a different way.
This is nothing new to some of you, but I suppose some of you aren’t all of you. Jones, this year, is still swinging aggressively. He’s still hitting the ball harder than average. He’s still not drawing walks, but he’s still on pace to hit 25 or 30 dingers. Jones, in almost all areas, looks like himself. But all of a sudden, there’s contact. Jones is avoiding whiffs like he hasn’t avoided whiffs.
One way we can look at this: table form. Below, strikeout rates and contact rates, since Jones became a major-league regular:
| Season | K% | Contact% |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 21% | 78% |
| 2009 | 18% | 75% |
| 2010 | 19% | 75% |
| 2011 | 18% | 77% |
| 2012 | 18% | 75% |
| 2013 | 20% | 74% |
| 2014 | 20% | 75% |
| 2015 | 12% | 84% |
You’ll notice the consistency. Only one of the seasons shown is partial. In all the other ones, Jones batted more than 500 times, and his strikeout rate fluctuated between 18 – 21% while his contact rate fluctuated between 74 – 78%. Given that background, the change this year appears dramatic. Especially for a player who’s months away from 30. With Machado, you can at least figure that sometimes it just clicks for a 22-year-old. Jones would be tougher to explain. There’s a big change in one place. Not much has changed in other places.
These are the biggest changes in contact rate between 2014 – 2015:
- Danny Espinosa, +12%
- Ichiro Suzuki, +9%
- Adam Jones, +9%
- Curtis Granderson, +8%
- Yasmani Grandal, +7%
Espinosa has shown something like this contact skill before, in 2011. Ichiro has a long record of hitting the ball. Granderson used to be about an average contact hitter. Grandal is back to where he used to be. This is the weirdest for Jones. This is the most unprecedented for Jones. Nor does it come with an easy explanation. Last season, Jones ranked in baseball’s 59th percentile in in-play rate. This year, he’s in the top 10%. Have I told you it’s weird? It’s weird.
There is something that might be driving you crazy. So far, we’ve been comparing a partial Jones season to full Jones seasons. That isn’t fair! Full Jones seasons give unusual things time to even out. We can fix that. This year, Jones has played 35 games. So let’s look at 35-game rolling contact rates, going all the way back to 2008. This can tell us whether Jones has ever done something like this before in his career.
Neat, but, could be more helpful. Let’s truncate that y-axis. It’s a shady thing to do, but only if you don’t call attention to it. I’m calling attention to it. I’m truncating the y-axis! This is what that looks like:
You see a lot of activity around 75% or so. A few peaks jut above 80%. But this current run? By this measure, at least, it’s a career high for Adam Jones. He’s never before had a 35-game contact rate of 84%. Last year he briefly reached 81%. He got up there as well in the middle of 2012. It’s actually an interesting graph — beyond Jones setting a new high, it seems like there’s been more dramatic volatility the last few years of Jones’ career. I don’t know why that would be. I know that baseball is a game of constant adjustments on both sides, but that seems over-simplified.
What’s been demonstrated is that Jones hasn’t done this. Not specifically this. And if you wanted to go a different way, you can calculate that the odds are very low of a player with Jones’ historical contact rate making as much contact as he has over nearly 300 swings. What that validates, I think, is the idea that this is interesting. But it’s ever so much harder to explain. Ultimately, at this point, we’re talking about 25 swings. The difference between old Jones and this Jones is 25 swings that made contact instead of not making contact. What does that mean, really?
A big part of this job — maybe the biggest part of this job — is finding interesting things in the numbers, and writing them up. Often, we’ll focus on players who seem to be making changes, because players are easy to compare against themselves, and change is interesting. Then you get to talk about why the change might be helpful, and you get to speculate on to what degree the player will improve. But if I’m going to be fully honest with you, I don’t know how much else there is to say on this. I don’t know how much I’m supposed to believe in Adam Jones’ new-found contact skill.
It’s unquestionably interesting. It addresses a weakness. Conveniently and curiously, this year the Orioles have a new hitting coach in Scott Coolbaugh. Yet, Jones is 29, and almost 30, and he’s been a good hitter for a while. He’s no less aggressive a swinger than he used to be, so it’s not like there’s a clear improvement with his eye. And I can’t find video evidence of a different swing. Internet searches don’t pull anything up. There’s nothing closely linking Jones and Coolbaugh in a way that would explain a drive for more contact. Everything is practically the same, except for one thing. It’s an important thing, but an awful weird one to just happen.
Which isn’t to say it can’t happen. It can, and maybe it is. But the best explanation I could think of is Jones simply focusing more. And having more of a plan, every time he goes up to hit, and every time he looks for a pitch. Then he might become better at making contact, because he has a better idea of how he’s going to be pitched. It wouldn’t explain why the other plate-discipline numbers haven’t really budged, but this is what I have. Greater swing consistency. Which would make it sort of the hitter equivalent of a pitcher just improving his command. That’s the toughest thing to observe and prove, but it happens for guys, as they ascend to higher levels of performance.
Adam Jones has been up to something. I wish that I could say more. Adam Jones with more contact at the plate would be even more of a star center fielder. Maybe he’d join the game’s elite. I’d sure like to know if he’s getting there. I just don’t have a choice but to wait to find out. Which, I guess, is how it is always.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.


Jones has been intentionally coy about the adjustments he’s been making after working with Coolbaugh, but he has said some things about “hunting fastballs” and ignoring breaking balls early in the count. I am sure that 1) this is easier said than done and 2) whether he is actually doing this could be evaluated by looking at the pitch-by-pitch stats, so I don’t know how much to make of it either. He did rip a first-pitch breaking ball for a 2-run double in the 8th inning on Sunday, so obviously it’s not an absolute. In all, I think that Coolbaugh has helped several Oriole hitters have a better plan when they go up to the plate, understanding patterns in the way pitchers attack them, etc. Maybe it’s sunk in a bit, although the offense has been poor lately.
Wild guesses here: vision correction? unpublicized therapeutic use exemption for Adderall? more practice dedicated to hitting balls outside of the strike zone harder? (since he’s not laying off of them any better – might as well learn to hit them hard more consistently, ala Vlad)
Sounds dumb but: did anyone check if Jones had anything done with his literal eyes over the offseason (contact lens prescription, LASIK etc)?
His swing looks more or less the same to me but maybe he’s actually seeing the ball better leading to higher contact rate.
I remember during an Orioles home broadcast very early in the season, Jones was asked about the changes he’s made at the plate this season that helped lead to his hot start. He said something generic about an adjustment that Coolbaugh had recommended. The broadcast team pushed him for more, but, he refused to say anything else, calling it a secret amongst the two of them. I’m paraphrasing a little bit here, but that interview always struck me as being odd because I’d never seen Jonesy clam up and refuse to answer a pretty simple question like that. I would love to be a fly on the wall during a meeting between Jones and Coolbaugh.
I saw the same. And it seemed odd at
the time cause Jonesy did not smile either . Dead serious
I wonder if its because most of the “big” pitchers are gone from the AL East either due to trades, FA or DL.
Price, Lester, Lackey, Moore, Cobb, Tanaka, Hellickson, etc.
And on a related note, any time you get to feast on the Jays’ and BoSox decrepit pitching is probably good for the ol’ batting line.
And a quick check does indeed show a slash line of 414/452/621 against Boston and 375/459/750 against Toronto. Getting to tee off on AAA-esque pitching staffs does a good hitter good.
Good point. There is hardly a good pitcher in the east right now.
*Chris Archer glares*
You forgot to mention the 4th best pitcher in the AL by FIP… the majestic Odor of St Pete.
That might be an explanation if most other hitters in the AL East were also experiencing the same kind of spike in contact rate. Are they?
That’s a fair point. I was mainly just taking an opportunity to say, man, those teams’ rotations are just gobs and gobs of suck. It’s like eight ounces of suck in a 6-ounce container and some is spilling over the edges, as the container simply cannot contain all of the suck.
Hellickson?1
Moore too. Bit of a reach
As we talked last night on the show, Coolbaugh was projected as being very aggressive based on his time as a hitting coach with the Texas Rangers. The difference in plate approaches from numerous players including Machado, Schoop (prior to injury), and Caleb Joseph has certainly shown early on in the season. Even making something of Jimmy Paredes could be attributed to Coolbaugh or the Orioles magic to turn nothing into something.
However, the plate discipline wouldn’t attribute to contact rate directly unless Jones is working more counts to his advantage and sitting on off-speed pitches.
Re: working counts…in lieu of a laborious pitch-by-pitch analysis, how hard would it be to just look for a trend in pitches faced per at-bat?
Pitches and PA are both listed on his player page. I did some quick and dirty calculations: 3.3 this year, ~3.6 most other years. However if he’s making more contact and swinging just as often this makes perfect sense since more PA’s would end with contact rather than continue with a swing and miss now.
maybe the more interesting story is how much volatility there has been in recent years. in addition to setting a career high, he’s also set a career low. what is the volatility like in the late 20’s and early 30’s for players like Jones?
Quick Question – couldn’t find the answer through the glossary link on the top – it counts as “contact” when a batter hits a foul ball, right?
Well, I guess I should have refreshed one more time…
Yes, it does.
Just out of curiousity and because I can’t find it: How do foul balls factor into contact% ?
His current run doesn’t really seem all that unusual wen you look at previous runs. Slightly different, but mostly the same as points in time before… seems to me this is just Adam Jones in a small sample size.
I agree, this pattern is repeating, the contact rate graph shows it. This iteration is more extreme then the previous, but that also looks like the start of a pattern.
In my opinion (and i watch Jones play quite a bit) he is learning how to maximize the hot streak and minimize the slump. This is someting Jones has been doing for several years and it continues to pay dividends.
What throws chaos in the numbers is the amount of time he played through injuries which really put him in some slumps. He stays healthy this year and I predict its his best.
Jeff, any idea what those graphs would look like for Z-contact and O-contact, rather than overall Contact%?
Prediction: Adam Jones will be the next player suspended for PED use.
Dammit, Bavasi…
Truncating the Y axis is standard practice in a lot of professional research, so you shouldn’t feel the need to apologize for it. It makes the chart much clearer by eliminating tons of white space, and I would say it’s actually more misleading to imply 0% is minimum for Adam Jone’s contact %. Practically speaking the minimum is more like 60%, so the second chart was both clearer and more truthful.
Also excellent article as always.
Just pre-empting some grousing and hand-wringing, no doubt.
Not sure you could figure it out this way. But could it have to do with the particular pitchers he’s faced in this run?
Definitely interesting, and thought-provoking. My guess is that it is noise, and that when you check at the end of the year, Adam Jones contact and K rate will be in line with his other years.
Jeff: try to remember to revisit this at the end of the year, and let us know whether he reverted to his old self. I know that my memory is not good enough for me to look back at Jones in October.
Jeff Sullivan, you say it’s shady, and yet you truncate that Y-axis anyways. You rebel, you.
Does Harang live math?
If math tastes like flaming hot Cheetos.
Why don’t k% and contact% add up to 100%? What’s the third option?
K% is per plate appearance, contact% is per pitch swung at. Totally different things that should not be summed.
Both his o-contact and his z-contact are up and the increase in each represents about a 4.5% increase in his total of 9% increase in contact% this year vs 2014. There’s always sample size to worry about, but for established guys I tend to think of increases in z-contact more likely to be skill or approach change than increases in o-contact. I have zero numbers to back that up, but it’s always made sense to me and has seemed to pan out. So unless he’s swinging at less pitches outside of the strike zone, I would bet on that o-contact increase just being luck or a hot streak. At least some of the increase in z-contact may be skill or better approach. Scott Coolbaugh is a baddass, so there’s that.
Looking at his plate discipline, he’s swinging at higher % of pitches outside of the zone and lower % of pitches in the zone, so it’s not like his batting eye has improved.
I think there’s a decent chance he holds on to some of the improved contact in the zone, and the contact outside of the zone normalizes closer to his career.
There’s something to be said for players who finally have a child. Just an idea that floats around the scouting industry.
“Jones is avoiding whiffs like he hasn’t avoided whiffs.”
Does that actually make any sense?
Makes just as much sense as the lyrics of that song from Flahsdance: “She’s a maniac, maniac on the floor. And she’s dancing like she’s never danced before.”
But maybe I should feel good. Most people that have seen me dance say that I dance like I’ve never danced before.
I’ve seen this before. The oscillations are just due to sunspots and the solar variation.
I’m tempted to cry “small sample size!”, which is perhaps the last refuge of the analytical scoundrel. But let’s assume for the moment that Jones has made an adjustment. If so, it’s a big one.
Jones in 2015 is 57th in contact % (83.5%).
Jones from 2013 to 2015 is 133rd in contact % (75.0).
If I had to shove in a big stack, I’d say that Jones has made adjustments based on how he’s been pitched. In the perpetual sine curve of hitter vs. pitcher, Jones has caught the big wave. Before the Hawaii Five-O theme fades, Jones will be whiffing at something approximating his career rate. If the Orioles are lucky, they’ll already be wearing rings by then.
Jeff, if you had truncated the y-axis to 82%, Jones’ contact rate would be off the chart!!
If you had the Orioles-centric podcast last year when Jones had achieved 81%, would you have written the same article, or is the climb to this year’s high necessary? The ascents are similar and, since last year started at a lower point than this year, the amount of change is similar from low to high.
Or, if the timing had been last year (or the year prior; can’t tell) when Jones was at an all-time low near 66%, would the opposite article have been written?
Timing is everything!
not just more contact; more good and less weak contact. some relevant rate stats:
(LD% / GB% / FB%)
2014 — 17.5% / 47.0% / 35.5%
2015 — 21.6% / 41.5% / 33.9%
(soft% / med% / hard%)
2014 — 20.7% / 46.3% / 33.0%
2015 — 11.8% / 56.3% / 31.9%