After Years of Struggle in San Diego, Eric Hosmer Is Suddenly Red Hot

It would be an understatement to say that Eric Hosmer’s contract with the Padres has generally not worked out. Over the first four years of his eight-year, $144 million deal, the former Royal netted -0.1 WAR in over 2,000 plate appearances, making him one of the majors’ least valuable players to receive substantial playing time in that span. He’s been red-hot in the season’s first few weeks, however, and while he won’t sustain his current .382/.447/.579 clip, the question is whether he can still help a team that was close to unloading him just a month ago.
Hosmer signed with the Padres in February 2018 (right around the time this scribe joined the FanGraphs fold and shortly after noted Hosmer skeptic Dave Cameron — who included the first basemen among his free agent landmines — joined the Padres’ research and development department). In his first four seasons in San Diego, he produced WARs of -0.5, -0.9, 0.7, and 0.6, with the high coming in his 38-game 2020 season, during which he missed time due to a stomach ailment and a fractured left finger but hit .287/.333/.517 (128 wRC+) in 156 PA.
In the context of the first 11 seasons of Hosmer’s career, it would not be unreasonable to call that season a small-sample fluke. From 2011-21, he had nearly 200 38-game stretches across which he slugged .500 or better even if we limit those stretches to the same season and count overlapping ones. Yet he has never slugged .500 or better over a 162-game season, nor has he posted an isolated power of .200 or better. He maxed out on both of those in 2017, when he hit .318/.385/.498 with a .179 ISO while matching his career high in homers (25), a performance that led to the Padres backing up the Brinks truck.
Having called the 2020 season a fluke, it’s worth noting that Hosmer’s batted ball stats from that stretch did support that gaudy slash line; his .282 xBA and .517 xSLG were pretty spot-on with his actual numbers. The reason is that he was hitting the ball in the air with far greater consistency than ever; his 46.2% groundball rate represented a career low, and his 34.2% fly ball rate a career high, both more than eight points removed from his career rates (54.4% and 25.6%, respectively). Likewise, his 1.35 groundball-to-fly ball ratio was a career low, and just the fourth time in his career that he was below 2.0. He’s not only never come close those marks over a full season, he’s never done so over a rolling 38-game stretch outside of that campaign, save for the very start of his major league career, before he reached a 38-game sample. I had to split his rolling graph into two segments so as not to overload our graph-maker; note the convergence of the red and yellow lines in the bottom graph, showing his more recent seasons:


Whatever Hosmer did in 2020 didn’t carry over to last year, when he hit .269/.337/.395 (102 wRC+) while producing a 55.2% groundball rate and 25.8% fly ball rate. The Padres, who clearly needed an upgrade to Hosmer, explored trading him to the Cubs and Rangers, but couldn’t find a match. While they ended up missing the postseason after reaching it for the first time in 14 years during the shortened season, their weak production from first base was just one of several reasons. They continued to search for an upgrade during this offseason, eying Freddie Freeman and Matt Olson, and when both of those players quickly found new homes after the lockout ended, they landed Luke Voit in a deal with the Yankees, then explored trading Hosmer to the Mets as part of a package that would have also sent away Chris Paddack and Emilio Pagán in exchange for Dominic Smith. That deal reportedly would have required the Padres to eat over $30 million of the $59 million remaining on Hosmer’s contract, but the Mets ultimately balked at taking on even $24 million given their Competitive Balance Tax situation.
So Hosmer kept his job, and so far that’s been a very good thing for a team that’s gone 15-8 to start the season and currently shares the NL West lead with the Dodgers (14-7), with the Giants (14-8) just half a game behind. Hosmer leads the majors in batting average, ranks second in the NL in on-base percentage and wRC+ (200), is tied for third in the league in WAR (1.3) and is sixth in slugging percentage.
Even given that it’s early in the season, you probably don’t need me to tell you that Hosmer won’t maintain that kind of production, but our legal department continues to insist upon such boilerplate. That said, it’s worth dissecting his current performance to appreciate what he’s doing differently, if anything.
As you may have gathered from the graphs above, Hosmer is hitting the ball on the ground a whole lot. His 59.4% groundball rate is five points above his career mark, and just one point off his career high, set in 2018, while his 18.8% fly ball rate is a career low, about seven points below his career mark and nearly a full point below his previous low, also set in 2018. That 3.17 groundball-to-fly ball ratio has been surpassed just 20 times by qualified hitters since 2002, as far back as our batted ball splits go:
| Player | Team | Season | PA | GB/FB | GB% | FB% | BABIP | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Revere | MIN | 2012 | 553 | 4.61 | 66.9% | 14.5% | .325 | 86 |
| Ben Revere | PHI | 2014 | 626 | 4.51 | 64.7% | 14.3% | .330 | 93 |
| Christian Yelich | MIA | 2015 | 525 | 4.16 | 62.5% | 15.0% | .370 | 120 |
| Luis Castillo | FLA | 2005 | 524 | 4.13 | 62.8% | 15.2% | .317 | 112 |
| Raimel Tapia | COL | 2021 | 533 | 4.10 | 67.4% | 16.4% | .306 | 76 |
| Derek Jeter | NYY | 2012 | 740 | 3.94 | 62.5% | 15.9% | .347 | 117 |
| Luis Castillo | FLA | 2004 | 649 | 3.80 | 65.2% | 17.2% | .325 | 98 |
| Luis Castillo | FLA | 2002 | 668 | 3.69 | 63.6% | 17.2% | .346 | 99 |
| Ichiro Suzuki | SEA | 2004 | 762 | 3.65 | 63.1% | 17.3% | .399 | 131 |
| Nori Aoki | KCR | 2014 | 549 | 3.63 | 61.9% | 17.1% | .314 | 102 |
| Luis Castillo | MIN/NYM | 2007 | 615 | 3.63 | 66.7% | 18.4% | .325 | 96 |
| Jon Jay | KCR/ARI | 2018 | 586 | 3.59 | 59.3% | 16.5% | .319 | 86 |
| Derek Jeter | NYY | 2010 | 739 | 3.56 | 65.4% | 18.4% | .307 | 93 |
| Skip Schumaker | STL | 2009 | 586 | 3.49 | 61.0% | 17.5% | .341 | 107 |
| Christian Yelich | MIA | 2014 | 660 | 3.42 | 61.0% | 17.8% | .356 | 118 |
| Derek Jeter | NYY | 2011 | 607 | 3.36 | 62.4% | 18.6% | .336 | 104 |
| Juan Pierre | COL | 2002 | 640 | 3.33 | 62.0% | 18.6% | .314 | 64 |
| Wilson Ramos | NYM | 2019 | 524 | 3.26 | 62.4% | 19.2% | .310 | 106 |
| Derek Jeter | NYY | 2006 | 715 | 3.25 | 59.4% | 18.3% | .391 | 138 |
| Dee Strange-Gordon | MIA | 2015 | 653 | 3.19 | 59.8% | 18.7% | .383 | 116 |
| Eric Hosmer | SDP | 2022 | 85 | 3.17 | 59.4% | 18.8% | .426 | 200 |
For the sake of clarity I have omitted four other qualifiers from this young season with even higher GB/FB ratios, namely Randy Arozarena, Garrett Cooper, Nathaniel Lowe, and Sheldon Neuse — a tip-off that such rates are so extreme that they’re rarely maintained. As you can see some players maintain ratios even more extreme than Hosmer, with higher groundball rates and/or lower fly ball rates, and some of those players even manage to be more productive than league average, but nine of the 20 who carried ratios higher than 3.17 over a 162-game season had a wRC+ below 100, and all of them save for the two members of the 3,000 hit club, Jeter and Suzuki, had a 120 wRC+ or lower. Hosmer’s not going to keep up with a 200 wRC+ — shocking, I know — but the combination of his actual stats and his Depth Charts rest-of-season ones still yields a .285/.348/.443 line, a significant improvement from his preseason forecast .262/.324/.410, eyeballing somewhere in the 130-140 range wRC+-wise under the current neo-deadball era conditions. That will play.
Hosmer’s slash line is driven by a .426 BABIP, which is in a virtual tie with teammate Manny Machado for the major’s fourth-highest. He’s got a .368 BABIP on grounders, well above baseball’s .224 mark and his own .245 career mark. Again, he’s not likely to maintain that, particularly given his 24th-percentile sprint speed.
Statcast-wise, Hosmer’s 87.1 mph average exit velocity is more than three ticks below last year’s average, placing him only in the 25th percentile, while his 6.3% barrel rate is in the 39th percentile; his 44.4% hard-hit rate is good for the 68th percentile. The contrast between those last two placements makes sense, as hard-hit rate includes all balls with exit velocities of 95 mph or more, many of which are routine groundouts with minimal (or even negative) launch angles, while barrel rate includes only balls with the launch angle/exit velo combos that produce an xBA of at least .500 and an xSLG of at least 1.500.
If there’s any surprise regarding Hosmer’s Statcast expected numbers, it’s not that he’s far ahead of them — the leaderboards are full of such hitters — it’s that his .310 xBA and .470 xSLG are still more than respectable even given his groundball-heavy ways. It’s not as though he’s tapping into the new market inefficiency by hitting the ball on the ground so often; major league hitters are batting .231 and slugging .252 on groundballs this year, numbers that are respectively eight and nine points below last year’s marks, and 15 and 16 points below those from 2015-21 combined.
So how is it that Hosmer is so productive given the extent to which he’s wearing out the dirt and the grass? For one thing, he’s pulling the ball more than ever; his 45.3% clip is over 11 points above his career mark and, seven points above his career high, set in 2011. He’s pulling the ball in the air more than ever as well, via fly balls and line drives, and good things tend to happen when you do that:
| Year | BBE | Pull% | Pull Air BBE | Pull Air% | Pull Air SLG | Air TB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 495 | 36.8% | 55 | 11.1% | 1.291 | 25.8% |
| 2016 | 477 | 36.1% | 31 | 6.5% | 1.333 | 15.8% |
| 2017 | 501 | 31.3% | 29 | 5.8% | 1.679 | 16.2% |
| 2018 | 472 | 31.8% | 38 | 8.1% | 0.921 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 461 | 33.0% | 37 | 8.0% | 1.541 | 21.7% |
| 2020 | 117 | 37.6% | 21 | 17.9% | 1.381 | 39.2% |
| 2021 | 413 | 30.8% | 38 | 9.2% | 1.316 | 24.9% |
| 2022 | 64 | 45.3% | 12 | 18.8% | 1.333 | 36.4% |
I’ve limited the window to the Statcast era, but it’s worth noting that Hosmer had a double-digit percentage of pulled air balls in three of his first four seasons, including a 14.0% mark in 2014; it’s something he has largely stopped doing. He hasn’t had more than 55 pulled air balls in a season since 2015, and hasn’t had more than 38 in a season since coming to the Padres. Right now, he’s on pace to produce 91 such balls over the course of a 650-PA season. That will prop up the ol’ slugging percentage.
We’ll see if that continues; right now, we’re talking about just a couple of handfuls of batted balls in a three-week span. Looking elsewhere to see what’s different about Homser, a few other things stand out. His 10.6% walk rate and 14.1% strikeout rate are both much better than his career norms (8.1% and 17.7%); he’s doing that while chasing a career-high 36.5% of pitches outside the zone. The combination strikes me as unsustainable (no pun intended), but on the other hand, he’s seeing just 35.7% of pitches in the zone, about five points below his career mark and currently the seventh-lowest rate among qualifiers in the majors — halfway between Juan Soto (34.9%) and Mike Trout (36.5%), two hitters to whom he should never be compared under normal circumstances.
A couple more things stand out thus far. Hosmer has basically been unplayable against lefties, owning a career .253/.299/.369 (81 wRC+) mark against them, and a 84 wRC+ against them last year. With Voit sidelined by a biceps tendon injury (and generally DHing before then), Hosmer has started seven of the Padres’ nine games against southpaws, and is just annihilating them at a .440/.481/.640 clip through 27 PA. He’s 4-for-9 against Dodgers lefties Tyler Anderson, Justin Bruihl, Clayton Kershaw, David Price, Julio Urías, and Alex Vesia, with no more than one hit against any of them; meanwhile, he’s 3-for-5 with a homer against the Reds’ Reiver Sanmartin, a guy with a 13.78 ERA and 6.70 FIP overall. Don’t expect this to continue.
Particularly since coming to the Padres, Hosmer has been extremely weak against breaking balls of all flavors. This year, on the other hand, he’s destroying such pitches:
| Pitch | Years | % | AVG | xBA | SLG | xSLG | wOBA | xwOBA | SwStr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slider | 2018-21 | 18.3 | .166 | .200 | .239 | .311 | .209 | .256 | 17.8% |
| Curve | 2018-21 | 11.3 | .203 | .192 | .284 | .267 | .235 | .227 | 17.6% |
| Slider | 2022 | 21.4 | .400 | .397 | .700 | .781 | .545 | .548 | 8.2% |
| Curve | 2022 | 10.4 | .625 | .505 | 1.375 | .806 | .868 | .556 | 8.3% |
Against all breaking balls, he’s 9-for-18 with a 1.000 SLG when putting them in play, and when he’s not, his swinging strike rate is a bit below half of what it was from 2018-21. Where he particularly struggled against breaking balls in the lower third of the strike zone or below (.160 AVG/.220 SLG from 2018-21), he’s hit .333 and slugged .778 on the nine he’s put into play.
We’re talking about tiny samples all around, and I wouldn’t expect Hosmer to maintain his success against lefties or breaking balls, particularly as he doesn’t appear to have made any major changes to his swing. Given president of baseball operations A.J. Preller’s recent quest to trade him, and general penchant for wheeling and dealing, it’s worth wondering whether the Padres might take the opportunity to sell high on Hosmer this summer, but given that he’s one of just five Padres regulars producing at a league-average-or-better clip, that might not make sense. What’s more, he’s been a popular player in the clubhouse even in lean times, and for a team that’s had its share of internal problems in recent years, trading a player whom The Athletic’s Dennis Lin recently called “a revered teammate and, especially for younger major leaguers, a steadying presence” is a huge risk. The Padres have waited a long time for Hosmer to justify his big contract, and he may never fully live up to it, but currently, it seems more likely than not that even if he cools off, they’ll take what they can get from his production.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Hosmer’s deal was front loaded and includes an opt-out after this season. He goes from $21MM/year for the first 5 years to $13MM the next 3 years. If he keeps this up, I could almost see Boras and him opting out of the remaining 3/$39MM to try and shoot for a 4/$60 or something in what is likely his final contract of any note for his career. He only has the one opt out – after 2022 – so this could be amazing timing for the Padres to get out from under the last 3 years…
Absolutely no one this side of dick manafort is going to be tricked by a funky babip into giving Hosmer $40m plus this off-season. The only free agent first baseman in the last 3 years to get more than that was Freeman. There is no chance at all he opts out.
I just want to point out that technically, “no one this side of Dick Manafort is going to be tricked” doesn’t refute the idea that he won’t opt out. (And in fact, explicitly leaves open the possibility that he will get more than $40M this offseason).
It would be amusing if Preller gave him a raise in the new contract given his great year and revered clubhouse presence. It happened once
We all said the same thing after the 2017 season, and Preller handed out the $140MM contract. I don’t think it’s likely at all, because I don’t think it’s likely he finishes as more than a 1 WAR player this year. Just that it could be possible if he keeps this up (even if he does opt out, he might find that Boras/he overplayed their hand, wouldn’t be the first time. Or last).
He’s already been worth 1.3WAR, so it seems pretty likely he’ll finish over 1.
assuming he goes back to be being sub-replacement level, I’ll still take the under on 1 WAR
I don’t know why we’d assume that. ZiPS has him at another 0.7 WAR for the rest of the season, which is similar to his performance the last two years..
Why would Dick Monfort sign Hosmer? He has a better 1B already.
I’m not saying he’s going to. It was just a potshot at the Rockies. But the NL does have a DH now, sooooo
Maybe the Rockies sign him to play left field (Kris Bryant is now the catcher).
Kyle Schwarber went from catcher to left field and also used to play for the Cubs so there is a solid precedent
We could use a lefty to play 1st base, so we wouldn’t move him. There’s a hole at 2nd base, and Cron throws righty so it’s better to move him there.
Dumbass.
With Charlie Blackmon’s time running out, they’ll have a spot for a DH. This is not a particularly good reason, but considering that they signed Kris Bryant to play left field you can’t rule it out.
Remember when y’all thought this for a minute in 2020 too?
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/eric-hosmer-achieves-lift-off/
To be fair, this one is a lot more skeptical than that last one.
I just remember the eno article and feel he deserves all the shit he gets
Wrong guy. Whoops.
It should be noted that Hosmer’s SweetSpot% is the second highest of his career and at 32.8% is essentially league average (32.9%). The only other time he’s had a similar SweetSpot% was 2020 when he has 33.3%.
If this rate holds he would expect about 22 additional batted balls (assuming approximately 450 batted ball events per season) hit at optimal launch angles compared to his career SweetSpot% of 28.5%. Given than these types of batted balls are more likely to go for extra bases than an average batted ball that marks a significant improvement to his batting line.
This also helps explain how, despite elevated ground ball rates he’s getting better results than expected because SweetSpot% actually includes a segment of batted balls with launch angles between 8° and 10° that are also included in ground ball rate but actually produce a significantly higher woba than other ground balls.
Follow up: None of this is to say this is sustainable but that doesn’t mean it’s not explainable.
Getting to face Reds pitching for 5 games and going 9 for 17 with 2 homers and 7 walks definitely helps.
Is this the new thing? If you need to break a slump, you just play the Reds?
Guess that means Votto is doomed unless traded.
Excellent piece. Obviously there will be reversion to the mean with the bat and the Padres can only hope it holds out long enough for Tatis to come back, allowing Cronenworth to be part of an unconventional lefty-lefty platoon at 1B.
Jay doesn’t mention it, but Hosmer is posting much improved defensive numbers (in a tiny sample). He did lose last sunday’s game on a lazy play, but he’s otherwise passing the eye and stat test so far. 0.8 dWAR is not earth-shattering, but for a player who has NEVER posted positive dWAR it’s a welcome sign. Maybe Melvin got through to him, or he’s pissed about the trade rumors or he’s motivated by the opt-out, but I can’t shake the feeling that he simply cares more this year.
This is a common narrative that I can’t support. It implies that a guy who has been one of the best 1k baseball players on earth, for the past decade+, simply wasn’t caring enough. Not saying you are wrong, but it’s a dangerous narrative path – especially when contradicted by an anecdote about losing the game on a “lazy” play.
yea I’m not buying it. He’s running a career-high ground ball rate with a career low average exit velo
Also a near career high sweet spot percent which includes a subset of traditional grounders
I really like the extra digging into his appearances vs LHP. Often when we talk about SSS it is waived off as just SSS, but when you look at what the sample is made up it might give us more info as to why a player is doing bad/good. Certain match-ups just work for certain guys and sometimes you have a run of pitchers you hit well against that you won’t have again. It isn’t just SSS it is the specifics of the sample that often make for a good week or month that may or may not be repeatable. Saying Hosmer is better against LHP in a small sample is one thing, but looking at the specific LHP gives us a better understanding.
In Kansas City, Hosmer’s career line were always, always been about whether he hit line drives. Some years, he would hit about 22-23% of his balls as line drives, and in others he would hit about 16.5-17%. And he did well in the years where he hit a lot of line drives, and not well in the years where he didn’t.
It should be noted that 22-23% is not an especially high number. It’s pretty good, but not fantastic. A 22.5% line drive number gets you to about #120 out of 583 qualified hitters from 2011-2022. A 17% line drive number, however, is terrible. That’s 568th out of 583 qualified hitters.
In any case, it’s apparently hard to hit line drives regularly, at least if you’re Eric Hosmer. But ever since Hosmer came to the Padres, he has exhibited a much tighter pattern around 20%, including this year. It’s likely things are more reliable for him in San Diego, but not in a good way, since he’s been a roughly average hitter since then.
Given that his line drives haven’t changed all that much, I’d expect everything to revert back to the x-stats. But the increased walks and decreased strikeouts are a positive development, even with the chase rates. His xBA is .310, which would be the second highest batting average of his career (and given that it doesn’t include the walks, it would be close to the highest OBP of his career). That is, if he can actually keep this batted ball distribution up.
One other thing to note–it’s interesting to note that the other guy with a ridiculous BABIP is Manny Machado. Given that we now live in the age of the universal humidor, I am wondering if there is something about the Padres’ humidor that has substantially changed how certain hitters’ profiles play. No one else on the Padres has really experienced this, but I’m tempted to dig in to see if there’s something that Machado and Hosmer share that their other teammates don’t.
Looking back at Hosmer’s minor-league numbers, you would think he had plenty of 130+ wRC seasons in him, not just the occasional odd year. He destroyed guys while being super young for his level, but I do wonder if all those years playing at Kaufmann Stadium, for an anti-TTO organization, thwarted his power development.
I’m looking forward to hosmer becoming a disgruntled broadcaster driven by grievances over the criticism of his ground ball hitting ways. He seems like a mortal lock to spend 25 years in a booth complaining about the nerds who said he needed to change while holding his (what will then be) 15 year MLB career and 2000 hits against everyone. Coming to a Kansas City booth near you!
this is sadly accurate. I’m hoping we can get to a new generation of former player broadcasters that actually seem to like baseball, but we seem forever doomed to a rotating cast of ex-stars that will only complain about how the game was so much better in their day
The key is that you have to find guys who (1) are famous enough that they’re on the radar of broadcasts, (2) who are analytically inclined enough to keep up with trends, but (3) not analytically inclined enough that they’d rather work for a team or in some independent player development role.
Of current players, the only one who comes to mind is Joey Votto. But I could see him preferring to work as a hitting instructor instead. I’d think pitchers are normally better bets for this because of all of the work that’s gone into Driveline type stuff, but I can’t think of anyone who would fit the bill.
I am a Padres fan and I didn’t realize that Hosmer was pretty much a lock for 2000 hits. He has 3 years left after this year, and needs 342 hits. There is still a chance he doesn’t get to finish his contract, but that is looking less likely with his hot start. I am happy for him, but it seems as if he was causing his own problems and is now trying harder and getting with the program.
In 2025, it is possible that both Eric Hosmer and Manny Machdo will be in the 2000 hit club with the Padres. On the final day of the 2001 season, Rickey Henderson joined Padres teammate Tony Gwynn in the 3000 hit club.
Ugh.
It sounds like he’s basically traded opposite field fly balls for pulled fly balls and grounders. I guess if you try to pull everything in the air it may not matter whether the other BIP are grounders or opposite field fly balls. The more surprising thing to me is the high swing rate out of the zone with low K and high BB
I think we all know it’s just a lucky streak. .426 BABIP and 87.3 EV. The rest is just meaningless stats when his track record and those two stats say it all.
.426 BABIP
87.3 Exit Velocity.
Say what you will about Hosmer as a ballplayer but I bet he’ll hit excellent infield practice for his son’s little league team
On the one hand, I’m glad he’s doing well this year. No one likes to struggle, especially so publicly, and I’d bet he’s feeling pretty good about himself.
On the other hand, I think it was him and Billy Butler that tried to bully one of the Fangraphs writers several years back, so fuck him.
Hosmer and Moose were the ones busting on Eno. Butler tried to get them to lay off. Given Butler’s dustup with Danny Valencia a few years later, it’s now obvious that Country Breakfast doesn’t go well with red-ass.
Everything you read about Hosmer makes it pretty clear he’s not a great person.
So in other words, sell him on in him in fantasy. But in real life, I wonder if a return to Kansas City would be in order with the Santana’s struggles.
Lol, if that happens, cue up the #FreeNickPratto hashtag.
Melendez also needs a spot