Alex Wood Is Finding His Strikeouts Again

Just before the trade deadline, the Braves, Marlins, and Dodgers struck a big deal, at least in terms of quantity of players and money being moved around; 13 players changed uniforms, and when the dust settled, the Dodgers came away with a trio of pitchers to upgrade their staff: starters Alex Wood and Mat Latos, along with reliever Jim Johnson. While they had been a heavily-rumored destination for frontline pitchers like David Price, Johnny Cueto, and Cole Hamels, the Dodgers ultimately decided to with depth over star power, adding multiple good arms rather than one great one.

Of course, a large driver of that decision was the relative cost, as they could acquire these kinds of pitchers without surrendering any of their best young talents, and they’ll also control Wood’s rights through the 2019 season; he won’t even be eligible for arbitration until after next year, so he’s going to make something close to the league minimum next year. So, while no one thinks Wood is on David Price’s level as a pitcher, he offered a better value when future years of control and financial obligations are factored in.

But choosing Wood and Latos over one better pitcher wasn’t just about getting a cheaper pitcher, or even just about getting a guy they could control for multiple years. In Alex Wood, the Dodgers were attempting to buy low on an asset with significant upside, which is exactly the kind of move that they’ve been making ever since Andrew Friedman and Farhan Zaidi took over the baseball operations department last winter.

If you want to know why the Braves were willing to trade a 24 year old pitcher with four years of control remaining after this season, you can essentially sum up their reasoning in one easy table.

Season Fastball Velocity Strikeout Rate
2013 91.7 23.6%
2014 89.6 24.5%
2015 89.3 17.7%

Those are his numbers with the Braves over the last three years, and you’ll note that Wood has lost 2.5 mph on his fastball since his big league debut; this year, his strikeout rate took a big tumble as well. If you are looking for statistical signs that a pitcher is breaking down, decreases in velocity and strikeout rate are usually the first two places you want to look, and Wood’s 2015 performance raises enough red flags that the Braves were rightfully concerned that his value may have already peaked. From their perspective, dealing Wood now may have been salvaging some value from a declining asset before that value went to nothing. If you’ve seen Wood pitch, you’ll know that his delivery looks painful even on a good day; it isn’t hard at all to imagine a guy who throws like that is going to have a short career.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

But as both Eno Sarris and Daniel Brim have written, deeper dives into his pitch qualities don’t seem to support the idea that Wood’s stuff is rapidly diminishing. By and large, he’s throwing mostly the same pitches this year as he threw a year ago, and he ran a 24.5% strikeout rate in 2014, a year in which he was one of the game’s most effective starting pitchers. Sarris’ early-season look at his issues concluded that he may just be struggling with command issues, while Brim noticed that he was throwing from a lower arm slot, a change that could suggest his mechanics may just need to be tweaked somewhat.

A lowered arm slot generally leads to larger platoon splits, as it gives opposite-handed batters a better look at the ball and makes it more difficult to throw strikes that aren’t diving right into a hitter’s power zone. And, sure enough, Wood was struggling to get right-handed hitters out this year after doing just fine against them the last two years.

Vs RHBs BA OBP SLG wOBA
2013 0.255 0.326 0.365 0.307
2014 0.231 0.290 0.355 0.288
2015 0.289 0.362 0.419 0.343

So, yeah, Brim could very well be correct, and if the Dodgers could get his arm slot raised back up, perhaps they could help reduce the success right-handers had against Wood during the first four months of the season. But while Wood has still been highly effective against left-handed batters this year, his strikeout rate has taken a tumble against them as well, falling from 26% last year to 19% this year. So this probably isn’t just an arm-slot issue, and there might have been a more systemic problem causing his strikeouts to disappear this year.

And it’s possible that the systemic issue goes by the name A.J. Pierzynzki. The Braves signed the veteran catcher as a free agent this winter after catcher-of-the-future Christian Betancourt flopped in his debut last summer, and while Pierzynski has been excellent as a hitter for the Braves — putting up a .300 average with some power in regular playing time — his work behind the plate leaves a lot more to be desired. Especially when it comes to helping his pitchers get marginal calls.

Among catchers who have been behind the plate for at least 4,000 pitches this year, Pierzynski ranks as the game’s fourth-worst pitch framer, according to the calculations from StatCorner. 15% of the pitches that he’s received in the strike zone have been called balls, four or five percentage points higher than the guys who rate well by the framing metrics. No one is ever going to be able to get every call to go their way, but Pierzynski gets fewer than most, and this may be having a particularly negative impact on Alex Wood.

We have Heat Maps that show the percentage of pitches being called strikes in a given area. Here’s what the league average called strike rate looks like for 2015.

AverageCS

And now, here’s what Alex Wood’s called strike rate looked like in Atlanta this year.

WoodCS

In particular, look at the box in the corner of the zone that represents low-and-away pitches to left-handed batters. On the whole, umpires are calling a pitch in that area a strike 81% of the time when hitters don’t swing, but when Wood was on the mound with the Braves, they were only calling that pitch a strike 68% of the time. With 60 pitches in that zone that hitters haven’t gone after, that’s 10 pitches — just in that one zone — that most pitchers get for strikes, where Wood has had it called a ball.

And if you look at the boxes around that zone, we continue to see Pierzynski’s possible influence on Wood’s outcomes. In the box representing pitches just off the outside corner at the knees, the average pitcher is getting a called strike on 12% of pitches; Wood was getting called strikes on 7% of his pitches in that zone. In the box just below the low-and-away corner, which represents pitches just below the knee but still over the plate, the average pitcher is getting the call 7% of the time; Wood was getting that same call just 2% of the time.

The low-and-away breaking ball is the bread-and-butter out-pitch for nearly every pitcher who throws from a low arm-slot, but when Wood is pitching to the area around that lower-left (from the catcher’s viewpoint) part of the strike zone, he’s not getting much help from the umpires, and as such, pitches that perhaps could be strikes are going against him. And, as Brim noted in his piece, Wood has ended up pitching behind in the count more often this year, so even when those marginal calls go against him in 0 or 1 strike counts, they still force him to pitch more to the middle of the plate than if he could have gotten the at-bat to two strikes, thus forcing the hitter to chase pitches off the plate in order to protect the zone.

So, in theory, just getting away from Pierzynski could potentially help Wood’s results improve, even if he keeps throwing with the same stuff and the same mechanics he used in Atlanta. And, because the Dodgers now employ Yasmani Grandal as their regular catcher, he’s likely to get not only a bump from leaving behind one of the game’s worst framing catchers, but he’s going to a team that now excels at getting pitches called at the bottom of the strike zone.

Per Statcorner, only 11.6% of the in-zone pitches received by Grandal this year have been balls, and 9.6% of the pitches received out of of the zone have been called strikes, which is why he ranks as the third-best pitch-framing catcher of 2015, per their metrics. Baseball Prospectus’ estimates are even more generous, rating him as the #1 framing catcher of this season, suggesting he’s earned an extra 109 strikes for his team on the season.

Grandal excels at turning pitches at the bottom of the zone into called strikes, so he would likely have a larger impact on a guy like Wood than he would with pitchers who regularly throw at the top of the strike zone. And perhaps not surprisingly, since being traded to Los Angeles, Wood’s strikeout rate has spiked back up to previous levels, as he’s whiffed 24.5% of the batters he’s faced in his first two starts with Los Angeles.

While you don’t want to draw any conclusions based on the results of two starts, here are his called-ball-in-the-zone and called-strike-out-of-the-zone rates from his time in Atlanta and his first two outings with the Dodgers; all data courtesy of StatCorner.

Year Team Pitch In-Zone Balls Out-of-Zone Strikes
2013 ATL   981 19% 6%
2014 ATL   2422 15% 7%
2015 ATL   1868 15% 8%
2015 LAD   200 8% 15%

Again, two starts, and just 200 pitches, so it is way too early to suggest that the entirety of Wood’s missing strikeout problem was solved by switching catchers. But we have a good amount of data that suggests that Pierzynski is one of the worst framing catchers in baseball, and we have a good amount of data that suggests that Grandal is one of the best framing catchers in baseball, so it wouldn’t be a huge stretch to think that he’s going to get more strikeouts in LA than he did in Atlanta. And the early results are at least heading in that direction, even though it’s too early to draw any conclusions from the data.

The Dodgers bought low on Grandal last winter, valuing his pitch-framing skills enough to prefer him over slugging outfielder Matt Kemp, who was seen as clearly the more valuable player by traditional evaluations. That trade was probably the single best transaction any team made last off-season, and the Dodgers are now using Grandal’s value to take another shot at getting high-end performance out of a player not currently seen as a high-end acquisition. The overall results of Wood’s first two outings in LA haven’t been particularly great — he’s allowed seven runs in 11 1/3 innings — but his underlying peripherals have been more in line with his 2013/2014 performances, and not the reduced-strikeout 2015 numbers that got him shipped out of Atlanta in the first place.

There probably isn’t a lot of optimism surrounding the Dodgers right now, given that they just finished getting swept in Pittsburgh, especially since the Pirates beat up on Wood, Latos, and Johnson pretty well this weekend. With David Price dominating for the surging Blue Jays, it’s easy to look back and wonder if the Dodgers screwed up.

But if Grandal can help Wood get back to the pitcher he was the past two years, the Dodgers rotation will be just fine. The results haven’t been there yet, but there are reasons to believe that Alex Wood will still prove to be a pretty good acquisition.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

50 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Richard
11 years ago

That last table seems to contradict the entire premise of the article though. He wasn’t getting worse framing this year with Pierzynski than he was last year with Gattis, so how can that be to blame for the drop in strikeouts?

jdbolickMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  Richard

Excellent point. It is fair to suggest that Grandal might be able to compensate for some of Wood’s decline, but that last table completely undermines the argument that Pierzinzki has been responsible for that decline. Throwing additional cold water on Mr. Cameron’s idea is that Wood’s two Dodgers starts featured a jump in swinging strike rate rather than called strike rate, while the first Dodgers start also registered as Wood’s second lowest average fastball velocity of the season (only ahead of his last Braves start).

Roger
11 years ago
Reply to  Richard

…and the 2013 numbers are even worse, so we can’t say that it’s Gattis’ and Pierzynski’s fault without giving them more credit than Brian McCann.

The FoilsMember since 2017
11 years ago
Reply to  Richard

This. There is just such an obvious counterpoint to the entire conclusion of this article.

Vance
11 years ago
Reply to  Richard

Gattis 2014: 6594 pitches -1.1 RAA
Pierzynski 2015: 5371 pitches -8.7 RAA
Grandal 2015: 5552 pitches +16.4 RAA

Seems like Gattis was an average framer, AJ below average and Grandal above average to me with the numbers.

Vance
11 years ago
Reply to  Richard

It also should be mentioned that Wood is throwing more in the lower half of the strike zone, should perhaps he didn’t need much of a framing catcher in the past as he does now.

highrent
11 years ago
Reply to  Vance

Its a very fair point. Dave neglected to mention that Wood is pitching more to the corners. THis could be a disconnect between him and Pierzynski but more than likely its because Wood wants to hit those spots and pitch more to the corners. He’s become more and more a deception pitcher and while effective he definitely is declining he’s just been moving to compensate unfortunately strategy doesn’t work as much with a guy who doesn’t get the corner calls. I think its a bit early to think all of wood’s Ks are due to Pierzynski. But it definitely could factor in. He’s also become a different pitcher from a good portion of the Braves staff who have a different approach for Miller, Teheran and the like. It was more about getting a controllable pitcher who they felt they could improve mechanically and where their environment could give him an edge.

Andrew
11 years ago

How much of Wood’s decline in fastball velocity can be attributed to pitching in the rotation this whole season? I couldn’t easily find a split of velocity as a starter versus as a reliever, but Wood had 20 relief appearances in 2013 and 11 in 2014.

Andrew
11 years ago

If you exclude Wood’s RP velo in 2013, his average FB is only 91.1

Brendan
11 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

And that 91.1 mph is only his first 50 innings as an MLB starter.

Switching back and forth from reliever to starter, and making his first starts at the MLB level. It seems easy to make the case he could have been throwing harder than would have been sustainable over a full season, and that 91.1 number is inflated as well.

Who is Zorbist?
11 years ago

Hey Dave,
Why is MLBer Richie Shaffer still listed as Minor Leaguer Richard Shaffer? He made his debut on the 3rd. It’s the 10th. I know you all missed on him as a prospect, but that’s no reason to still try to convince people he is not a Major Leaguer.

Doug
11 years ago

In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy’s skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes that same rib twice in succession yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe that this is some sort of a, a magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder?

Who is Zorbist?
11 years ago
Reply to  Doug

There is no reason for someone with 14 PA over the last week as a Tampa Bay Ray to still be listed as a Durham Bull on a top 10 MLB related website, whose stats are referenced daily by newspapers, TV personalities, broadcasts, online articles, etc. I don’t know what a rib xylephone has to do with anything. I think people looking for Shaffer ought to be able to find him. His name is wrong, and his team is wrong. It’s a pretty big deal on a site like this.

jpg
11 years ago

Um, it’s really not a big deal. I mean really, do you actually believe FanGraphs’ credibility is going to take a hit because a whole entire week has passed without an update on Richie fuckin Shaffer’s profile? Nobody cares except for you because you are apparently still holding a grudge over Shaffer getting no love during the prospect write-ups. There are bigger things in life that are worth getting butt hurt over.

Bobby Ayala
11 years ago

Hey Zorbist, there’s a “Contact Us” link at the bottom of the screen you can use to report things like this. Sure makes a lot more sense than complaining in a completely unrelated article, probably get the problem fixed a lot faster too. Thousands and thousands of players in their database, go ahead and cut them a little slack when they don’t immediately get everything right all the time.

Who is Zorbist?
11 years ago

All it takes is referencing ESPN.com and not Fangraphs.com, and you lose a reader. I stop going to websites all the time when I find something I like more. My Myspace page would be pretty embarrassing if anyone ever found it.

He went 3 for 3 with the game winning home run last night. I bet some people went looking for him on here, and couldn’t find him. I knew where to find him though. All I had to do was look under the wrong name and in the wrong league.

It was fixed, moments after the question was asked, so obviously someone here thinks it’s worth fixing.

Who is Zorbist?
11 years ago

I didn’t know about the “contact us” link. Thanks for pointing it out.

Who is Zorbist?
11 years ago

LOL. I went to find the “Contact us” link you spoke of. All I had to do was scroll down 8 pages, past 7 advertisements, past 6 GIFs, look in between “Player Linker” and “Advertise with us”, wait for my tab to become responsive again, and in tiny letters, there it was. Shockingly, I’ve never seen it before.

CTRL + F
11 years ago

Hmm.

Bobby Ayala
11 years ago

Sorry Zorbist, next time ask Dave to come over to your house and show you how it works. Enjoy the rest of your long life trying to figure out how to use the internet.

Who is Zorbist?
11 years ago

Bobby, that sounds like a lot to ask. If I’d have known what I was looking for before I found it, it sure would have been easier. My way was petty easy though, and effective I might add. People have had to scroll through a lot of us arguing because of your snippy comments. Just scroll past, and let Dave thank me for improving the accuracy of his website.

Contol F “contact us” doesn’t work for:
Hardballtimes
ESPN.com
Hardballtalk
Baseball-Reference
Brooksbaseball


Control F “Contract Us” doesn’t work very often. The other option of scrolling through 7 pages of content I read on Friday hoping that it might be there? No thanks. My way worked fine.

My Incompetence Is Someone Else's Fault
11 years ago
Wobatus
11 years ago

I went looking for him and found him under Richard Shaffer as a minor leaguer. It happens. And I don’t think fangraphs was singular on his prospect status. Sickels was pretty down on him after last year too. And Kiley did acknowledge that Rays’ contacts were telling him he had retooled his swing and he wanted to see how he’d do this year.

Jason B
11 years ago

Doug’s response to the original post was *perfect*. It won the whoooole internet.

King Buzzo's Fro
11 years ago
Reply to  Doug

Doug bE Fresh, yo. It WAS perfect Jason, I agree.

srytrollin
11 years ago

a good reminder our new saber overlord farhan zaidi fleeced the old saber-hating backwards thinking jon hart & you must all agree.

Bobby Ayala
11 years ago

“While you don’t want to draw any conclusions based on the results of two starts…” That’s right, you don’t, yet that’s exactly what this article is. Being self-referential about the folly of your exercise is kinda funny.

Having watched last night’s game, Mark Wagner called anything that didn’t bounce a strike– I would be shocked if a search to find the worst called strikes didn’t keep coming back to this game– yet Wood continued to miss his target more often than hitting it. This is just the sort of anomaly that happens in a small sample size.

I understand that when you see a stat like in the final table you want to make a story out of it, but like so many Dave Cameron articles this seems to have realized its conclusion before the research was performed, and when the research didn’t back up the premise you tried to sort of force it anyway.

Pirates Hurdles
11 years ago
Reply to  Bobby Ayala

Yep, unless ESPN strike zone was way off, he was consistently getting pitches 3 inches outside to RH called strikes.

Meat Cart
11 years ago
Reply to  Bobby Ayala

And the conclusion was reached based on the front office that acquired the players, like so many Dave Cameron articles.

Dare I say – another Dave Cameron/Andrew Friedman puff piece?

Jim
11 years ago

Wow, after a weekend of getting their butts kicked all over PNC Park and new imports Latos and Johnson imploding all over the place the last thing I expected to see this morning was Cameron reaching hard to extend his ongoing infatuation w Friedman and write about what a genius he was but there you have it. At this pace the Dodgers will have the Dbacks (who only had an opening day payroll 183M less than La Genius Friedman) knocking on their door soon but Dave will still write an article titled “Friedman Smart Stewart Dumb”

Sean
11 years ago
Reply to  Jim

“Friedman Smart Stewart Dumb” made be literally laugh out loud in my office.

Too true. It’s seriously the motto of certain writers here.

Meat Cart
11 years ago
Reply to  Jim

There’s plenty of evidence to support “Friedman Smart Stewart Dumb”, but this article is not a part of that evidence.

Tom
11 years ago
Reply to  Meat Cart

Don’t forget there’s plenty of evidence that shows that Friedman can be pretty dumb too, led off by this horrendous decision: http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?query_type=year_round&year_ID=2008&draft_round=1&draft_type=junreg

That one decision cancels out a lot of the smart stuff he did with the Rays.

Cool Lester Smooth
11 years ago
Reply to  Tom

Tim Beckham was the consensus top HS prospect that year. He was Brendan Rodgers.

The problem was that pretty much all of his tools regressed pretty much immediately after signing.

Sean
11 years ago
Reply to  Tom

That first round… wow was it bad.

Mojito
11 years ago

And then a dropped arm slot can often point to a shoulder injury. Everybody vividly remembers the painful end of Roy Halladay’s career.

Josh
11 years ago
Reply to  Mojito

I was going to say the same – pitchers often drop their arm slot when they have shoulder pain b/c it puts less direct pressure on it.

They got him pretty cheaply, but there seems to be something wrong with Wood.

K
11 years ago

At the risk of sounding entitled (because the content here is tremendous), I’d like to mention one of my very few complaints about fangraphs player pages: the “2 Teams” line.

It would be awesome if that were at least expandable to show which two teams and the numbers put up with each team.

Brandon
11 years ago
Reply to  K

Click any “Partial Seasons” link on the page.

K
11 years ago
Reply to  Brandon

User Error wins again. Thanks.

Bob Warja
11 years ago

Some of you seem awfully critical on Cameron. Personally, I enjoy his work.

Cool Lester Smooth
11 years ago
Reply to  Bob Warja

So do I, generally, but he does have a bad habit of deciding on his conclusion before he does any research, and being intellectually dishonest in his arguments if there’s any conflict between the facts and what he had decided to argue.

Sean
11 years ago
Reply to  Bob Warja

Cameron has written some excellent, thought-provoking pieces that can be progressive or outside-the-box in their way of thinking.

Lately, the majority of his work seems to be about pushing subjective narratives and creating/following a hype machine. Go look at the quality of his chats over the years. They’ve gone downhill fast.

Rated RookieMember since 2017
11 years ago

A shift to first base side of the pitching rubber is what Wood has credited with “finding his strikeouts again”: http://m.mlb.com/news/article/137924506/braves-alex-wood-earns-win-over-dodgers

EDogg1438
11 years ago

Some of Wood’s traditional ERA numbers with the Dodgers look worse because the Dodgers bullpen has given him no help. Of the 7 R he has allowed, 3 of them were inherited runners let in on a brutal grand slam by the truly horrible Joel Peralta.

Phil
11 years ago
Reply to  EDogg1438

Peralta came on after Johnson. Those runs were attributed to Johnson, not Wood.

EDogg1438
11 years ago
Reply to  Phil

I was referring to Wood’s first start with the Dodgers when Peralta gave up a grand slam in “relief” of Wood. Both him and Johnson have been lit up like a Christmas tree though so it tends to blend together.

TheChaosPath
11 years ago

Theorem: Zorbist is actually Cameron starting a shitfest to distract everyone from the fact that his article doesn’t make any god damned sense

Weston
11 years ago

Jim Johnson wasn’t an upgrade. Can we please get past that?

Daniel SteinbergMember since 2016
11 years ago

The data on Wood’s velocity is a bit misleading. In 2013, Wood spent most of his time in the bullpen, and pitcher’s historically have gain velocity when pitching from the bullpen. His average velocity in games started was still higher in 2013 than 2014 or 2015, but it’s not as drastic.