Angels Lock Up Jered Weaver
Jered Weaver is one step closer to becoming an Angel For Life. Sunday night, the Los Angels Angels of Anaheim agreed to a five-year, $85 million dollar contract with their 28-year-old ace.
Weaver’s status as one of baseball’s premiere pitchers is certain. Weaver has only once failed to post an ERA below 4.00 (2008) and is now in his second straight season with both ERA- and FIP- marks below 75. He ranks third among qualified starters in ERA- over the past two seasons and fourth in FIP-, among such names as Justin Verlander, Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, and Felix Hernandez, to name a few.
Two of Weaver’s contemporaries near the top of the list supply near-perfect context with which to evaluate his new extension. Justin Verlander signed a five-year, $80 million contract extension with the Tigers before the 2010 season, and the Mariners locked up Felix Hernandez with a five-year, $78 million extension.
The qualifier “near-perfect” is necessary since these contracts weren’t all signed at the same time along the arbitration timeline. Verlander and Hernandez each signed their extensions with two years of arbitration remaining, whereas Weaver’s deal covers his third year of arbitration and four years of free agency as opposed to three. As such, we should expect Weaver’s deal to include anywhere from $5-7 million more — essentially, the Angels, Mariners, and Tigers each value their aces equally.
The comparison between Verlander and Weaver is almost unfairly easy to make. Observe — and while observing, note that Verlander and Weaver are both in their age-28 seasons:
The graph measures ERA, but the point hardly changes were we to change our metric to FIP. Over five years of data, it shouldn’t.
Adding Hernandez doesn’t break the comparison down too much (particularly when we account for the effects of SafeCo Field), until you account for his age:
It’s quite clear the Angels are getting a competitive level of production, particularly in terms of present talent, for their money as the Mariners and Tigers are. And all three of these contracts look to be bargains, as each pays for roughly four wins worth of talent for pitchers establishing performance levels above five wins, at least as judged by Wins Above Replacement.
But we can’t ignore the massive age difference between Weaver (and Verlander) and Hernandez. The Angels (and Tigers) are getting a great deal on their aces, particularly early, but they need the results now given the uncertainties with tricenarian pitchers, as the contracts carry the recipients through their age-32 seasons. It’s simply remarkable that the Mariners were able to lock up such a young talent in the 25-year-old Hernandez at a similar value as other elite pitchers who will soon enter their thirties.
The fact that the Mariners signed Felix Hernandez to an utterly insane deal doesn’t make the deal the Angels inked Weaver to a poor one, of course. Weaver is one of baseball’s premiere mound talents, and holding that amount of talent in one roster spot without completely breaking the bank is a coup for Los Angeles of Anaheim. And, to go with the purely economic reasons to like this deal, it’s always pleasant for the fans of a team to retain such a talent over a long period of time. The Angels and their fans should derive nothing but joy from this one, as the pairing of Weaver with co-ace Dan Haren should give the Angels a formidable pitching staff for years to come.
Jack Moore's work can be seen at VICE Sports and anywhere else you're willing to pay him to write. Buy his e-book.


Where’s mine? 🙁
you’re like 14, we’ll talk when you’re a consenting adult
In the bank account of your next owner.
Your first arbitration session should start with the total GDP of France.
I like to watch my homers.
I hope Jered calms down now he got his deal.
I hope he does quite the opposite – every fan wants a little bit of fire from their lead dog
Speak for youself
Seriously!
Strange that he’s a Boras client but was willing to take a discount to be with the Angels.
Gonzalez in CO, now Weaver in LA weird that we have two Boras clients signing extensions that previously he had fought to avoid.
He works for them. If they want to stay, it’s best that he represent their interest.
If you’ve got an offer on the table that won’t embarrass you when you’re trying to get new clients and you don’t have to go through the work of free agency, that’s an easy 2.5 mil.
Also, I wonder if Boras has looked at the market and thinks the market is going to be bleak for 6 and 7 year offers for pitchers beyond Sabathia.
In Gonzalez’s case, the extension wasn’t really a sacrifice. He capitalized on a huge season and an overzealous GM. If GMs were that careless with regularity, Boras would ink extensions all the time.
I would argue that locking up a 24 YO CF/RF who had 2.2WAR in 09(partial season) 6.6WAR in 2010, and 3WAR so far this year(partial/injury shortened season) through his age 31 season without having to pay for his decline is a savings.
Gonzalez has been through a severe bought with the flu(April) a wrist he hurt hitting the wall(July) and has still manage a .224ISO with career best BB% and K% guaranteeing him 17 million a year for the first 3 years of FA seems like a decent risk.
I’ve heard Scott Boras speak a few times and a question was asked about the Gonzalez extension in CO….
Don’t underestimate where Gonzalez came from. Boras strongly emphasized that Gonzalez came from a poor community and family and the security was way more important than the huge payday. He said it was hard for Gonzalez to look his family and friends in the eyes and explain how he continued to turn down money before finally accepting his 80 mil.
Like Ryan said, Boras works for the player and does what the player wants.
[1] CazrGo had a career year.
[2] Weaver is a pitcher. Hence he’s awaiting his lost season to injury.
Same deal with King Felix. These guys signed good extensions while they were healthy. If theyhad waited for free agency, they risked an injury-season that drastically dropped their value.
Imagine if Wainwright was a free agent after 2011. Would he have been dumb to sign a 5/85 deal in 2010? No.
We seem to talk out of the both sides of our mouths in regards to pitchers. We talk of the risk associated with them due to injury, and then question why/how they sign for lesser money in exchange for security.
Given the conomy and enviornment, combined with the risk of injury that drastically lowers ones leverage, I’m confident that all 3 pitchers feel great about their deals.
CC do you really believe 2010 was the only season between now and 2016 where CarGo is going to be a 3.5WAR player? The guy has had a bit of bad health in april when he had a severe case of the flu in the three weeks after he had a .158/.210/.228 with a .205BABIP since May he has a .307/.382/.575 with a .325BABIP with 20HR 13SB/4CS.
Justin Upton has a .298/.370/.545 with 25HR and 19SB in 127 games
CarGo has a .287/.358/.511 with 21HR and 16SB in 107 games
one is an MVP candidate one is a bad signing?
I’ll take one of these.
With some Oreos and peanut butter thrown in for Heidi Hamels.
Weaver is smart to take the money now. The record of injuries and breakdowns is extremely high for pitchers.
Weav is though about as low risk as a pitcher can be. He has a huge frame and puts very little stress on his arm with his delivery.
maxing out at like 93 will do that for you
Now all him (and Verlander) need are sweet nicknames
I still can’t stop smiling… and I’m at work even! Go Halo’s!
Vernon Wells
here’s my analysis of the deal.. any feedback is greatly appreciated.. let me know what you think.. thanks
http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/baseballecon
Total shit.
did you even read the post?.. if so please explain why it’s so bad
Waiting for the Giants to do this with Lincecum and Cain!
/dreaming