Arizona Diamondbacks: Sustainable Success?
Despite an early bounce from the postseason, it was a successful year for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The club reached the postseason for the fifth time in its relatively brief history (14 seasons) — and the franchise also saw breakout performances from the likes of starting pitchers Ian Kennedy and Daniel Hudson, as well as outfielder Justin Upton.
But how sustainable is Arizona’s recent success? Is the organization doomed to be a one-year wonder — or does it have the young talent to continue its assault on National League opponents? On first glance, the Diamondbacks appear to have a bright future.
Starting rotation
The emergence of Kennedy and Hudson has been key to the club’s success and the pair should be around for a while. Kennedy, 26, has found new life in Arizona after being cast off by the Yankees. He’s averaged more than 200 innings in the past two seasons and succeeds with merely decent stuff while also being a fly-ball pitcher. His 3.22 FIP in 2011 was more than a full run better than in 2010, when he posted a 4.33 FIP. While some regression wouldn’t be a shock — if Kennedy can continue to command his fastball like he did this season — he could continue to perform like a No. 2 starter.
Hudson, 24, is yet another former pitching prospect who was expelled from the American League and found success in the desert. The right-hander gave 222 innings of solid work in 2011, posting a 3.28 FIP. Like Kennedy, he doesn’t have overpowering stuff but he takes advantage of solid control (2.03 BB/9) and good fastball command. Unless Hudson finds a way to increase his ground-ball and/or strikeout rates, he’s probably a very good No. 3 pitcher.
Josh Collmenter, 25, has youth on his side but a somewhat limited ceiling and eventually might find himself in the bullpen. The right-hander has below-average fastball velocity and is primarily a two-pitch pitcher (changeup). His curveball isn’t overly effective and he uses it less than 6% of the time. Collmenter is also a fly-ball pitcher who is making his living in a hitter’s park.
Bullpen
The bullpen has some staying power, thanks to a trio of arms that includes David Hernandez, Bryan Shaw and Sam Demel. Mainly a starter in Baltimore, Hernandez has settled into the role that many scouts envisioned for him. With the permanent move to the ‘pen, his average fastball velocity jumped to just shy of 95 mph and he was able to focus on his two best pitches: a heater and a curveball. His 35 shutdowns (SD) gave him one more than Craig Kimbrel, and he had two fewer meltdowns (eight to 10) than the Braves rookie. The 26-year-old Hernandez could inherit the closer role in Arizona if he can hold off Shaw.
Shaw could end up as a pretty valuable arm out of the bullpen. The 23-year-old former second-round draft pick (and college closer) showed excellent ground-ball abilities (60 GB%) in 28.1 big league innings in 2011. If he continues to exhibit solid control — as well as consistent command of his cutter — he could be the eighth-inning guy in Arizona for a while, if not the team’s closer.
Demel, soon-to-be 26, had another up-and-down season. He has some promise as a seventh- or eighth-inning guy, but he needs to improve his fastball command. His future isn’t as bright as the other arms ahead of him, though.
Starting lineup
Arizona has some real depth in the starting lineup, when it comes to hitters with youth and upside.
Upton, of course, leads the charge after posting an almost-MVP season. Just 24 years old, and in his fifth MLB season, the outfielder showed legit power (.240 ISO) and utilized his lightening-quick bat to bang out his first 30-plus-home-run season. He also showed a well-rounded game with 21 steals, a decent walk rate (8.8 BB%) and solid defense.
First baseman Paul Goldschmidt burst onto the scene with a little more flair than expected. The 24-year-old slugger didn’t light the world on fire but he flashed power (.224 ISO) and patience (11.3 BB%). His lack of secondary skills and athleticism limits his potential — as does his history of high strikeout rates (including a 29.9 K% mark in the major leagues). He should have some solid value for a while but he could quickly become a too-expensive, one-trick pony.
Gerardo Parra, 24, is an interesting player. With three seasons under his belt, he’s improved his approach against lefty pitchers to the point where he’s not a threat to be platooned. Still, I’m not convinced he can continue to be an everyday left fielder. Parra displays excellent defensive skills and some base-running ability (15 steals in 16 tries), but he is getting noticeably more “stocky” as time goes on. With his limited power (.135), Arizona might soon look for a more traditional offensive threat for the position.
Although I wouldn’t call then exactly “young” at 28, outfielder Chris Young, shortstop Stephen Drew and catcher Miguel Montero should continue to be solid players for the club as long as their contracts remain reasonable. Montero is clearly the more-valuable of the three, thanks to his above-average offense and defense from a key position. He’s coming off a four-win season as a catcher. Drew has never lived up to his potential due to inconsistencies and injuries and Young has never really matured as a hitter.
Prospects
If they can stay healthy, both Jarrod Parker and Trevor Bauer could graduate to permanent big-leaguers in 2012. You could argue that they might develop into No. 1 or No. 2 starters if they continue their current growth patterns. Tyler Skaggs and Pat Corbin were both acquired, along with veteran Joe Saunders, in the Dan Haren deal with the Los Angeles Angels in 2010. Skaggs has the higher ceiling but Corbin could also be a valuable big-leaguer. Archie Bradley has a massive ceiling but the prep pitcher was just drafted in 2011, so he has a lot of work to do before he reaches the majors.
The hitting prospects aren’t quite as enticing but there are some names to watch, with the likes of corner infielders Matt Davidson, Bobby Borchering, catcher Rossmel Perez and even perhaps outfielder A.J. Pollock.
Conclusion
Overall, the club clearly has enough MLB-ready players to form a strong nucleus for years to come. The minor league system — while not overly deep — has some high-ceiling prospects sprinkled throughout the organizational levels. Because many of the key players have yet to reach their primes, this club doesn’t appear to be a one-year wonder.
Marc Hulet has been writing at FanGraphs since 2008. His work focuses on prospects and fantasy. Follow him on Twitter @marchulet.
I agree. Parker, Bauer, Skaggs and Bradley are collectively as good as any group of pitching prospects in baseball. When Kennedy and Hudson start to get expensive they can be traded for even more young talent.
Wow. This writeup made made them a lot better than I thought.
Myself, I’ll gladly wager on them Plexiglassing and Pythagoring back to around .500 next year.
agree… not much has changed since this was written:
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-preview-arizona-diamondbacks/
I guess it all depends on how much you believe in Sauders, Collmenter, Hudson, and Ryan Roberts sustaining their success. I’m skeptical.
What does plexiglass mean?
Bill James long ago found out that teams that rise or drop bigtime one season typically regress or progress back the next. Like plexiglass bouncing back to ‘normal’ after it bends out.
with the arms they have coming they are a major NL power in the making.
PS, I’d love to get Parra away from them… I could see them giving more PT to Cowgill, and Eaton coming soon. If they’re making Parra available, I’m interested if I’m a lot of teams. He’ll have suitors as a pretty strong defensive OFer.
How good is that pitching when they don’t get to face the 3.5 RPG Giants or 3.7 RPG Padres? Those are the 2 lowest scoring teams in the NL, the Dodgers were right in the middle. Then yea, you have Colorado, at 5th with 4.5. However, the average of those 4 is 3.925, which is below the NL average of 4.1. Pretty easy to look good when you’re pitching against bad hitting teams.
Just think about Kennedy’s last 2 months, SF, LAD, NYM, PHI, WAS, SD, SF, SD, LAD, PIT, SF. If you look at it by their offensive ranking in the NL, it’s last, 9th, 7th, 6th, 11th, second to last (15th), last, second to last , 9th, 13th, last. That’s not impressive.
Any other division and their pitching is average. Really, their pitching IS average, 4.1 allowed puts them at 8th overall. Average statistics in a below-average hitting division where their team is the top scoring team.
I’m not sold on the D’backs, just another case of a team having a lot of things go right in a mediocre division. Happens every year in the NL West and AL Central. Next year it could be the Dodgers considering their centerpieces of Kershaw and Kemp. Could be the Padres.
While I agree they shouldn’t be OVERRATED, I think you went a little too far the other way.
1.) Once they got rid of Enright, Galarraga, & Heilman, and relegated Duke to the bullpen, their pitching was suddenly a lot better. So the year end “average” statistics don’t really reflect the staff that got most of the innngs in the second half.
2.) While true they got to face some weak lineups very often in SFO and SD, they also had to pitch their homegames in one of the best hitters park in the majors, so that counts for something too.
I agree there is likely to be regression, and I’d be surprised by another 90-95 win season.
Parker/Bauer/Skaggs are all likely to get major league innings in 2012, and while I think they all have an excellent chance at productive major league careers, the ODDS are that only one of them actually gives a lot of positive value in the majors. One of the three is likely to have a serious injury, and another one is likely to simply have performance issues.
But if all 3 can run the gauntlet and stay healthy through 2012, they could be in GREAT shape for 2013.
I
Again with the myth of the NL West being “weak”. Want a weak division, look at the Central, with its average record of 77-85. The West as a whole went 106-97 against the Central, with only the Padres having a losing record. The West also had a collective *winning* mark in interleague play, compared to the 37-56 posted by the Central. There’s your “mediocre division,” right there.
The season was built on career years from Roberts, Upton,, and Kennedy. The previous GMs assembled all the talent, while Towers couldn’t sign or trade for a single useful position player, and he has holes at 3rd and 2nd, and won’t be able to afford Drew or Montero much longer because ownership wants a bottom four payroll.
Roberts I’d perhaps give you, Kennedy to a certain degree (though that should easily be offset by improvements elsewhere in the rotation), but I see no reason why Upton shouldn’t be able to sustain this year’s performance – his 2011 is more what we’ve been expecting him to produce since he was signed.
Evidence for the claim, “ownership wants a bottom four payroll,” please? And even if this is true, it’s quite conceivable the entire rotation next year could be minimum wage, leaving plenty of money to go elsewhere.
Also worth mentioning: a full season of Paul Goldschmidt, instead of the gurgling vortex of first-base meh which was Juan Miranda, Xavier Nady, Russell Branyan and Btandon Allen, a quartet who combined for 0.1 WAR in over 500 PAs this year.
You missed out the player who made the biggest contribution to their winning the division.
Scott Cousins.
So the answer is no…
I know you want to believe otherwise, but Arizona won the division by eight games from San Francisco. In one-third of the season, Posey was worth only 1.6 WAR, so the Diamondbacks would likely have won at a canter even if Posey had been ever-present the rest of the way.
Additionally, San Francisco were outscored by their opponents last year, so are due every bit as much Pythagression as Arizona…
If you are looking at Posey’s WAR only you are looking at 1/2 the equation. You also have to look at who replaced him. If Whiteside et al had negative WAR then London has a stronger case.
I don’t see career year type numbers from any of their position players, so it’s possible that they could improve. The pitching went from terrible to very good in one year which seems suspect. I think the other teams in the NL west will get better, so I doubt the Dbacks will be able to sustain a playoff calibre team. Just look at the talent the Rockies had two years ago, and they haven’t been able to put it togeather.
If you don’t see career years from position players, you simply aren’t looking. Roberts, Upton, Parra, and Montero (hint, health).say the offense is taking a step back next year.
Was this writen by a giants fan? this is the most stupidest thing ive read all how can u say Kennady isnt a NO. 1 Pitcher the guy threw up a CY Young type season! and Hudson is only 24 he still learning and how can u say Chris Young never really matured as a hitter? the guy hit 20 bombs and he also hit 2 more in the post season and he was also hurt all season… yeah hes knot a AVG type hitter but hes Mr. Clutch when it comes down to crunch time he has 5 walk off Home runs in his career. And trust me Goldschmit is a Beast yeah hes a lil bit much on his Strikeouts but he started learning to put the ball in play and go the outher way later in the season (as seen in the post season) and if u dont think parra is an outfeilder look at his defence stats hes a gold glover he might knot be the guy thets gunna hit you 80 rbis in a season but he can hit u 40 and save u 40 runs on defence which is just as good. and u must be a retard if u think shaw is gunna be the closer. Putts has 1 more year on his contract and Hernandez is a Beast and saves 11 games in a row only alowing 1 hit in the span when pus was hurt. We will be back just wait we will be back!
sentences are your friend.
unless you are a Beast.
maybe this is a joke… but with humility and becuase we all have to start somewhere I’ll give you a few rebuttals:
– Chris Young has never matured as a hitter becuase he has the approach of a rookie, with severly compromised plate discipline that inhibits his ability to reach his ceiling.
– “clutch” is not a repeatable skill.
– RBI’s are a measure of opportunity and not a predicter of future performance.
You may be back next year but if so it will not be becuase of how many RBI’s Parra had this year or how many walk off homers Chris Young has had in his career.
I can’t see how we have many negatives. The outlook for the D’backs looks realistically great. They will have the same core. They will be rotating Roberts, Drew, Hill, and Bloomquist in the infield. Goldschmidt will have at least 30 home runs even if they platoon him here and there. The rotation in the outfield will be Parra, Young, Upton, Cowgill, and Bloomquist. The D’backs will always find enough offense. Their big edge will be pitching, the coaches and a ton of heart. Whether it is next year or the year after it will be Kennedy (17 wins next year), Hudson (16), Collmenter (14); not a big fan of Saunders (12) (hoping Parker gets rushed in, why not), Miley (11 wins) (hoping Trevor Bauer moves up half way through the season, this kid is amazing). I see them in it for the next few years.
I like Roberts, but it’s unlikely he will ebpver repeat this season. And Bloomquist is horrid, one of the worst position players in the entire MLB. If he gets significant at bats next year the team is in terrible trouble. Goldschmidt is a K machine on par with Reynolds.CY is a K machine with mediocre defensive skills. Cowgill? please, if ypthe plan is young players having breakthrough seasons let’s all just buy lottery tickets.
Well I forgot Parra in the career year category, and Goldie is far from lock to succeed. There is no denying the team will have a raft of good and cheap young pitching, and a legit monster in Upton. But what happens if Drew is shipped for budgetary reasons and his place assumed by the vortex of suck known as Bloomquist? Kendrick will never spend money.
No, I don’t have ANY argument at all for this, but I think that the D-backs will be very very good next year. Just as good as this year. Just watch out.