Pitching IS the Trademark of Braves Organization

Late last week, I posted a scouting report on Atlanta Braves third-base prospect Edward Salcedo. I received several comments voicing concern over the lack of hitters throughout the organization’s minor-league levels.

But as much as I understand the frustration (I certainly don’t enjoy watching a starting lineup full of non-prospects and organizational players), I’d urge readers to adopt a more big-picture view of the Braves organizational philosophy. And it’s really quite a brilliant strategy: leverage the ability to develop arms better than anybody else to fill needs at the big-league level. After all, ultimately it’s about World Series rings and not how many sluggers an organization has on its Double-A roster, isn’t it?

At the trade deadline, I was shocked that the Braves were able to acquire Michael Bourn without dealing a single “key” prospect. Sure, Paul Clemens (SP), Brett Oberholtzer (SP), Juan Abreu (RP) and Jordan Schafer (CF) might all wind up being big-leaguers in some capacity. but Michael Bourn is a top-flight center fielder who posted the second-highest WAR at the position between 2009 to 2011. For me, the sum of the parts who were dealt for Bourn didn’t equal one of the better center fielders in baseball.

Two years earlier, the Braves’ first attempt to acquire its center fielder of the future failed miserably — though it fit the Braves’ organizational M.O. at the time. Nate McLouth, fresh off a 3.9 WAR in 2008 with the Pittsburgh Pirates, was dealt in the midst of his second consecutive 3+ WAR campaign for a solid, but not spectacular package of prospects that included Charlie Morton (SP), Jeff Locke (SP) and Gorkys Hernandez (CF). In essence, the difference between Bourn and McLouth on paper was the addition of a hard-throwing reliever in Abreu to offset the difference in WAR.

Go back even further, Tim Hudson was acquired from the Athletics for two pitching prospects and an outfielder as well. The key piece in that deal was Dan Meyer, who was expected to fill the roles of Mark Mulder or Barry Zito.

After all, the Atlanta Braves is an organization capable of winning a World Series next season. And with the likes of Julio Teheran, Randall Delgado, Arodys Vizcaino and Mike Minor, the trade possibilities are limitless should Atlanta target a player and decide they have to have him. Of course that scenario already backfired once with the Mark Teixeira deal, but that’s beside the point. Arms equal trade leverage and Atlanta has enough pitching to throw its weight around.

If the Cincinnati Reds are serious about dealing Joey Votto, Frank Wren’s number is on Walt Jocketty’s speed dial. If Atlanta thought Jose Reyes was the missing piece and worth having at any cost, a deal most likely would have been made. Had the Braves coveted Adrian Gonzalez, a Freeman, Teheran and Vizcaino package would have crushed anything the Boston Red Sox could have offered, in terms of prospects. For me, the Braves are baseball’s most powerful organization.

For that reason, the fact the Braves don’t really have any top-flight hitting prospects isn’t that important. If Atlanta has a need at the big-league level, the pitching prospects are there to fix holes while a handful of potential regulars (Tyler Pastornicky, Edward Salcedo, Christian Bethancourt and Andrelton Simmons) marinate in the minors. The next wave might not be as exciting as Freddie Freeman or Jason Heyward, but average regulars at minimum salaries still provide tremendous value.

It’s easy to point to the aging Braves and assume the window of opportunity for World Series contention is closing. But that would be missing the point, because the Braves are a very healthy organization.

Throughout the off-season, my reports on Atlanta’s hitting prospects will be cast in a grim light — which is valid when viewed on a one-off basis. But the ultimate indicator of success or failure is whether a team contends for — and wins — World Series rings. The Braves should be in the mix for years to come. In writing about prospects, I find myself less interested in standings and more impressed with who’s on a team’s top-20 prospects list. The realities of Major League Baseball couldn’t be further from the truth.





Mike Newman is the Owner/Managing Editor ofROTOscouting, a subscription site focused on baseball scouting, baseball prospects and fantasy baseball. Follow me onTwitter. Likeus on Facebook.Subscribeto my YouTube Channel.

82 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JD
12 years ago

Michael Bourn sucks.

Signed,

wOBA and wRC+

Telo
12 years ago
Reply to  JD

A CF with a 115 wRC+ gives me a semi. Dunno about you.

JD
12 years ago
Reply to  Telo

I guess with the game becoming less offensive overall he doesn’t quite suck but his 98 career wRC+ and sub .90 ISO take away some of the ‘semi’ potential, for me anyway. UZR hated him this year but it might be an outlier looking at his career.

Telo
12 years ago
Reply to  Telo

Though I will say he looks to be about a wRC+ 100 true talent, assuming a 340-345 babip.

And even so, 4 WAR looks like a lock in 2012, under team control. Sign me up.

JD
12 years ago
Reply to  Telo

He is in the same class overall as BJ Upton, Adam Jones, Peter Bourjos and Cameron Maybin – I’d take those four over him.

I guess CF has become that weak where he is considered a ‘top-flight’ talent at the position.

Gone are Beltran, T.Hunter, Edmonds, V.Wells, Sizemore etc.

Telo
12 years ago
Reply to  Telo

I’m taking Bourn all day over Upton and Jones, and probably over Maybin as well.

Jackson
12 years ago
Reply to  Telo

The only person I’d maybe take over Bourn from that list is Upton…and thats a big maybe cause he had a subpar 2011. Michael Bourn is one of the best, if not the best centerfielders in the game, plain and simple.

DavidCEisen
12 years ago
Reply to  Telo

Bourn is very good, but he is hardly on the same level as Kemp, Ellsbury, and Granderson. He is also below Victorino, Hamilton, and McCutchen. Centerfield as a position is probably the strongest its been in a long time.

SKob
12 years ago
Reply to  Telo

DavidCEisen, you best not be talkin bout D-fense!

That list contains a few atrocities in CF! Offensively I would argue Granderson is streaky and fluky, while Victorino might not be as valuable. So I would call him top 5 with some true offensive superstars as the only ones he looks up to!

No way I like Upton, Jones, Bourjos, or Maybin better!

Louis
12 years ago
Reply to  JD

WAR disagrees.

Adam
12 years ago
Reply to  JD

Leaving aside the fact that defense and baserunning help win games too, Bourn has been an above-average hitter in CF over the past three seasons.

JD
12 years ago
Reply to  Adam

Sorry, the Braves didn’t make the playoffs so he isn’t valuable.

cs3member
12 years ago
Reply to  Mike Newman

The Cardinals concur.

SKob
12 years ago
Reply to  Mike Newman

There was very little merrit to that Cardinals comment. It’s not like he imploded like McClouth did.

SKob
12 years ago
Reply to  Mike Newman

There was very little merrit to that Cardinals comment. It’s not like he imploded like McClouth did.