I've updated the player search so it should work like people actually think it works. You can now type in full names, partial names, last names, and somewhat misspelled names and it should bring back proper results. Hopefully the search functionality will no longer deter people from the site!

I've added a feature that allows you to compare up to three players by Age. Age is determined by the season minus the year they were born. All you need to do is go the “compare” section of each player and you'll notice that there's an additional graph right below current season comparison graphs. Just for kicks, I pulled one pitcher age comparison graph and one batter age comparison graph.

Starting with the pitchers, I compared strikeouts per 9 innings (K/9) for Pedro Martinez, Roger Clemens, and Randy Johnson. Looks like Pedro has started to decline much earlier in his career than the other two. I'll pass on drawing any conclusions from this graph, but you get the idea.

For the batters I chose to compare isolated power (ISO) for Derrek Lee, Barry Bonds, and Albert Pujols. Pujols has way more power than Bonds had at the same age while Lee looks like he's finding his power a little later than Bonds did, but he's not far behind.

Anyway, I think you can see how these comparisons will be useful, maybe even more so than the season comparisons. Enjoy and feel free to send comments and suggestions by posting in the forum or you can fill out a feedback form.

Since the Dodgers and Jeff Weaver were unable to reach a contract agreement, Weaver will now seek to join a different team. After a uncharacteristically horrible season with the Yankees in 2003, he managed to get his career back on track with the Dodgers the past two seasons. Last season he was arguably at his best going 14-11 with a 4.22 ERA and a 1.17 WHIP. Let's take a closer look.

As far as strikeouts go he's been remarkably consistent with perhaps a slight (very slight) upward trend. In 2005 he had a career high strikeouts per 9 innings (K/9) of 6.31. While it's nothing to rave about, it will certainly get the job done considering how few people he walked last year.

To go along with his career high in strikeouts, he managed to push his walks per 9 innings (BB/9) to a career low 1.73. Now, that is something to rave about as it was the 12th best in baseball among starting pitchers. That brought his strikeout to walk ratio (K/BB) to a very good 3.65. So if his strikeouts and walks were at their best in 2005, how come he saw an increase in ERA?

Quite simply, he gave up 35 home runs which tied him for the 2nd most in baseball. He gave up at least one home run in all but 11 of his 35 starts. He's been historically excellent at keeping the ball in the park with his highest home run per fly ball rate (HR/FB) in his previous three seasons being 8.3%. I find it particularly odd that his walks suddenly dropped while his home runs suddenly spiked. While this may be pure coincidence, it's definitely something to be aware of.

If everything were to click for Jeff Weaver (almost last year) he could have a really great season, but that's the problem with Weaver isn't it? Things haven't clicked yet. That's not to say next season won't be the year he finally puts everything together, but I can't help but feel there's something fishy going on with his walks and home runs. It doesn't appear he has a whole lot of downside as he'll be three years removed from the Yankee debacle. Teams can expect another solid season from him, but they probably shouldn't count on anything special either.

I'm pleased to announce that Righty/Lefty and Home/Away split graphs are now available for the 2002-2005 seasons. I've pulled two graphs that I thought illustrated their usefulness. The first graph here is Dontrelle Willis' strikeouts per 9 innings (K/9). Just look at how freakishly dominant he is against left-handed batters!

Then I pulled up Jeromy Burnitz's isolated power (ISO) home/away splits to take a look at how much better he was playing at Coors Field. Notice how his cumulative ISO with the Cubs was quite similar to his 2004 road stats.

These were two of the more obvious examples, but I hope you'll find these graphs are much easier to take a quick glance at than traditional split data. The other advantage of these graphs is you can see multiple season split data side-by-side. Enjoy and if you have any suggestions or notice any bugs you can discuss it in the forum or send a feedback form!

Apparently the Orioles were close to acquiring Corey Patterson from the Cubs for a minor leaguer but now it appears that several teams are in the running. In 2004 Corey Patterson returned from a torn ACL to hit an impressive 24 home runs while stealing 32 bases. Last year he hardly lived up to his 2004 numbers as he only hit 13 home runs with 15 stolen bases. He was even sent down to AAA in mid-July to work on shortening his swing to help him make better (any) contact. He returned to the majors a month later and showed no improvement, finishing off the season with a .175 batting average. Talk about ending the season on a low note. Let's see if there's any hope of a rebound in 2006.

It really did look like he was learning to take a walk in the first half of the 2004 season but he reverted to his old ways in the second half and was even worse in 2005. Unfortunately, he strikes out a good deal too making his walk to strikeout ratio (BB/K) one of the worst in baseball.

Furthermore his isolated power (ISO) was down significantly last year. His home runs per fly ball was down from 13.5% to 11.6% which isn't that much of a decrease, but his doubles and triples took much larger hits. Most of this was the result of poor line drive percentage of only 17%.

It seems highly unlikely that Corey Patterson will magically develop plate discipline next season and become a reliable batter. Apparently the Cubs had been trying to shorten his swing for quite some time and he was unwilling to make the necessary changes. Typically batters that exhibit such poor plate discipline do not show significant improvement later in their career, but it's probably too early to write him off at only 26 years of age. It's really too bad because if he were to just become a little more patient he'd have 30 HR/30 SB potential.

The Phillies have signed Ryan Franklin to a one year, 2.6 million dollar deal. Ryan Franklin has been around a little while now (5 seasons) and he's been less than good. He also holds the dubious distinction of being one of the players suspended for steroid use. Last season he was at his worst, going 8-15 with an ERA over 5. Let's see if there's any hope he'll do better next year.

For starters his strikeouts per 9 innings (K/9) are sitting at a pretty bad 4.4. He's only once had his K/9 above 5 and that was in his rookie season when he pitched just under 80 innings. He's gone through various peaks and valleys with his K/9 (never really topping 6 at his best) over the past four years, but I'd say there's nothing here to suggest that he's capable of doing a whole lot better. The only pitchers that can get away with a K/9 this low are the ones that issue very few walks such as Carlos Silva, Jon Garland, and Paul Byrd.

Ryan Franklin does not fall into this category. In fact his walks per 9 innings (BB/9) have been heading in the wrong direction the past couple of years. Even if he does manage to reverse the trend, it seems unlikely it will decrease enough for him to be an effective pitcher.

Had enough bad news yet? Here's a little more: He's a fly ball pitcher. Seattle's Safeco Field is one of the better parks at limiting home runs. Only 9% of the fly balls are home runs compared to Citizen's Bank Park's 13%. He's never been great at keeping the ball in the park anyway and he won't be any better playing half his games in Philly.

I have some additional concerns about his batting average on balls in play (BABIP), but he's historically been below the league average so I'll hold my tongue. Let me just say it would be really scary if he were to ever have an “unlucky” season. If you haven't already guessed, I think you can expect more of the same from Ryan Franklin next season.

It seems like over the past couple season the name C.C. Sabathia and burnout candidate have gone hand in hand and with good reason. Since entering the league in 2001 at only 20 years of age he's thrown nearly 16,000 pitches which definitely gives him one of the heavier workloads in the past 5 years. He's handled it quite well and has actually never been on the disabled list having only suffered a few minor elbow and shoulder injuries. Last year he had one of his best seasons to date going 15-10 with an ERA just over 4. That may not sound that great, but after July he was 9-1 with a 2.24 ERA. How likely is it that C.C. Sabathia will pick up where he left off in 2006?

For starters the decrease in his ERA was fueled by an excellent strikeout per 9 innings (K/9) of 8.7 during the final two months of the season. He's shown late season surges like this before in 2003 and to some extent 2004, but never quite like this one. If we break down his K/9 a little further by right-handed and left-handed batters it becomes quite obvious what happened.

It looks like he figured out how to strikeout left-handed batters while there wasn't so much improvement against right-handers. The increase is rather severe, but the sample size is also a little small as only 16% of the batters he faced were left-handed. However the consistency of the increase throughout the year makes me want to say that it wasn't entirely a fluke. The other area he showed improvement in was his walks per 9 innings (BB/9) which he managed to get down to a career low 2.8.

Everything seems to be headed in the right direction for C.C. Sabathia. His strikeouts are up, his walks are down, and it looks like he really did show some good second half growth in 2005. It's also worth mentioning he took his groundball tendencies to new levels (mostly against left-handed batters, 3.0 GB:FB). While I certainly wouldn't expect him to continue pitching at the level he did in August and September, there's no reason he can't improve upon his 2005 season. He's already a solid pitcher and has showed that at times he's definitely capable of being an excellent pitcher. He'll only be 26 years old next season and maybe a little consistency is on its way.

With the departure of Sean Casey from Cincinatti, it looks like Adam Dunn will be moved to first base leaving a full time opening in the outfield for Wily Mo Pena. Wily Mo Pena has been unable to work his way through the minor league system due to contractual issues and was thrown into the Major Leagues in 2002 at only 20 years of age. Since then he has yet to play a full season, but has shown great power potential by hitting 26 home runs in just 364 at bats in 2004, and 19 home runs in 311 at bats last year. Now that he's all but guaranteed a full time outfield spot, is a 40 home run season in the cards for 2006?

If you look at his isolated power (ISO), he was nearly off the charts to start the 2005 season, but came back to earth after a number of nagging injuries (quadriceps, knee, wrist). While his ISO is definitely within the top 20% of all batters in 2005, his HR/FB is quite spectacular at just over 30%, the 3rd highest in baseball. Unfortunately, there's another stat that Willy Mo Pena ranks very highly in; strikeouts.

I guess “very highly” is a bit of a understatement, he's number 1 (or dead last, depending on how you look at it) in strikeout percentage (K%). He actually got worse when just a year ago he struck out in 32% of his at bats as opposed to his 37% in 2005. His walk percentage (BB%) isn't much to write home about either, as he only walks in just over 6% of his plate appearances. He did however show improvement in his walks towards the end of the season which seems to have carried over into the Dominican Winter League where he had 13 walks and 19 strikeouts in 80 at bats.

Because of his tremendous power, Willy Mo Pena might be able to come close to 40 home runs next season despite his awful plate discipline, yet I think somewhere in the neighborhood of 30 home runs is probably a bit more realistic. I don't think his sub-par batting average of .254 is likely to improve (and might even be worse) unless he shows some major improvement in his strikeouts. For a 24 year old with little minor league experience he's done pretty well for himself in the majors so far. His numbers aren't so far off from NL Rookie of the Year Ryan Howard, who's about 2 years older.

After suffering various setbacks through out his career, John Patterson finally pitched his first full season in 2005 for the Washington Nationals. I guess you could say it was worth the wait, as he led the Nationals pitching staff with a 3.13 ERA in just under 200 innings while striking out a team high 185 batters. In July and August he was one of the top 5 pitchers in baseball by going 5-2 with a 1.87 ERA and 82 strikeouts in 81-plus innings of work. Now that he has one full year under his belt, what should we expect from John Patterson in 2006?

For starters he has a good strikeout to walk ratio (K/BB) of 2.85 and very good strikeouts per 9 innings (K/9) of 8.4 for a starting pitcher. He relies mostly on his fastball which he usually throws in the low 90's but tops out at 97 mph. Occasionally he'll mix in his slider and curveball, but almost never when behind in the count. He'll really start to throw his curveball when he gets two strikes on a batter and it appears to have become his most reliable strikeout pitch. His slider is also a quite effective strikeout pitch, but he doesn't throw it nearly as often with two strikes.

The one thing you have to worry about with him is that he's an extreme fly ball pitcher. Last year he allowed only 7.5% of his fly balls to become home runs (FB/HR). Typically pitchers tend to regress towards the league average of around 11%, but playing in R.F.K. Stadium will certainly help him keep that number lower than average. R.F.K. Stadium has a HR/FB of only 7%, the lowest in baseball.

John Patterson will only be 28 years old next season and has just entered what should be his prime years. Don't read too much into his 9-7 record as he got very little run support with the Nationals. His strikeouts are just where they need to be and there's no reason he still can't continue to limit his walks. As long as he's pitching in R.F.K. Stadium, or other pitcher friendly parks I don't think there's as much cause for alarm as there usually would be in the home run department. His injury history leaves some concern, but if healthy, there's no reason why he can't do just as well as last year if not better. And if the Nationals can manage to pony up some runs for him, more wins will certainly be on the way.

The article I wrote about Juan Padilla being the luckiest pitcher in baseball got me thinking that maybe combining the three statistics of BABIP, HR/FB, and LOB% was not the best way to display a pitcher's overall “luck”. So instead of championing “Luck Factor” as a useful stat, I'm going to make a “luckless” ERA or luck independent ERA (iERA) which will have better practical applications. The formula is actually pretty simple:

iERA = ( ((.3627 * IP) – (.1287 * K) + (.1408 * FB) + (.3 * BB)) * 8.28) / IP

Basically this formula was the result of a bunch of relatively simple algebra on the three “luck” statistics HR/FB, BABIP and LOB%. Instead of solving each formula for each player, I plugged in the major league average for each, and proceeded to find out how many home runs, hits, unearned runs, and finally earned runs a player would have if everything was equal. This formula should normalize ERA for park, league, and in some sense, competition. In other words, it gives a pitcher's ERA as if all pitchers pitched under the same conditions.

Let's take a look at how iERA compares to regular ERA. Naturally there is some correlation here, but the correlation isn't that great. I just did this to make sure they were actually measuring two different things, and they do. What iERA does have a high correlation with is a pitchers strikeout to walk ratio. Not much of surprise here as strikeouts and walks (and fly balls) are what sets pitchers apart in iERA.

So you're probably asking, why should I care about a pitcher's iERA? It's actually quite good at telling you how lucky a pitcher was in any particular year. As you can see, once a player's ERA and iERA start to differ by more than 20%, there's about a 75% chance that his ERA and iERA will be closer the following year. Once you start to see a difference in ERA and iERA over 70%, it's pretty much a given that his ERA and iERA will be closer the next season.

Furthermore, the amount that a player's ERA will revert to iERA is somewhat a function of how far it deviated in the first place. Player's don't tend to stray from a 0% difference in ERA and iERA much further than 20% on average.

So just for kicks, let's take a look at some of the bigger discrepancies in iERA and ERA the past four years and see what they've done the following year. Here are 5 starters and 5 relievers that had a much lower ERA than they did iERA in 2004.

		2004			2005		
Name		ERA	iERA	% Dif	ERA	iERA	% Dif
Joe Nathan	1.62	3.80	-81%	2.70	3.65	-30%
Mike Gonzalez	1.25	2.83	-78%	2.70	4.15	-42%
Steve Kline	1.79	4.00	-77%	4.28	4.67	-9%
Luke Hudson	2.42	5.07	-71%	6.38	5.25	19%
Akinori Otsuka	1.75	3.62	-70%	3.59	4.19	-15%

		2004			2005		
Name		ERA	iERA	% Dif	ERA	iERA	% Dif
Jake Peavy	2.27	3.83	-51%	2.88	3.56	-21%
Al Leiter	3.21	5.07	-45%	6.13	5.41	12%
Bruce Chen	3.02	4.66	-43%	3.83	4.51	-16%
Carlos Zambrano	2.75	4.02	-38%	3.26	3.91	-18%
Tomo Ohka	3.40	4.81	-34%	4.04	4.63	-14%

Each of them did see an increase in their ERA and they all saw a drastic reduction in the percent difference between their ERA and iERA. Now let's take a look at the players that had a much higher ERA than iERA.

		2004			2005		
Name		ERA	iERA	% Dif	ERA	iERA	% Dif
Lance Cormier	8.14	5.12	46%	5.11	4.46	14%
Sergio Mitre	6.62	4.22	44%	5.37	4.17	25%
Mike Wood	5.94	4.37	30%	4.46	4.78	-7%
Brian Fuentes	5.64	4.32	26%	2.91	3.84	-28%
Neal Cotts	5.65	4.39	25%	1.94	4.25	-75%

		2004			2005		
Name		ERA	iERA	% Dif	ERA	iERA	% Dif
Casey Fossum	6.65	4.61	36%	4.92	4.50	9%
Derek Lowe	5.42	4.19	26%	3.61	3.69	-2%
Joaquin Benoit	5.68	4.42	25%	3.72	4.74	-24%
Brett Myers	5.52	4.48	21%	3.72	3.75	-1%
Scott Kazmir	5.67	4.62	20%	3.77	4.60	-20%

All of these pitchers saw a decrease in ERA, some more drastic than others. Neal Cotts had a very high ERA and iERA difference in 2005, which will certainly revert in 2006. Brian Fuentes also showed a very big difference in ERA, but notice that it was also reflected in his 2005 iERA. Here's the last list of pitchers which showed a very large difference in ERA and iERA for 2005.

Name		ERA	iERA	Dif
Juan Padilla	1.49	4.74	-105%
Mariano Rivera	1.38	3.38	-84%
Chad Cordero	1.82	4.36	-82%
Huston Street	1.72	4.02	-80%
Cliff Politte	2.00	4.52	-77%

Name		ERA	iERA	Dif
Tim Redding	10.57	5.51	63%
Alan Embree	7.62	4.28	56%
Greg Aquino	7.76	4.39	56%
Ryan Wagner	6.11	3.60	52%
Paul Wilson	7.77	4.91	45%

I'd like to emphasize that just because there is a large discrepancy between a pitcher's ERA and iERA doesn't mean that pitcher still can't be very good or very bad the next season. It just means that there's a high probability that pitcher will have an ERA much closer to his iERA the following season. If you subscribe to the theories of BABIP, HR/FB, and LOB% (and even if you don't), I think you'll find iERA a useful tool as it essentially combines the three of them into one simple stat that you can compare with any player's actual ERA to get an idea of how “lucky” a player was in a single season.

Update: Just a quick addendum, I've been told that iERA is essentially a pre-existing stat called xFIP. I was aware of just FIP, but I wasn't so aware of xFIP. I think xFIP might be a little better (even though the two are VERY close). If you're interested in xFIP, I'll point you over to the article: I'm Batty for Baseball Stats over at the Hardball Times.