Braves Break Through in the Ninth, Win 5-1

For much of Monday night’s Braves-Dodgers clash, the Dodgers seemed to be on the defensive. When the ninth inning began, the score was knotted at one (spoilers!). It was tied not because both teams were equal in the scorebook, but rather because the Braves had failed repeatedly to cash in on their chances.

Through eight innings, Atlanta left 10 runners on base to Los Angeles’ five. In the fourth, they put two aboard with consecutive one-out walks against Walker Buehler, who struggled with his control all night. Two on, one out: these are the situations that can make or break a start, and Buehler skated out of trouble by retiring Nick Markakis and Austin Riley.

In the sixth, the Braves knocked again. Travis d’Arnaud and Ozzie Albies led off the inning with singles, chasing Buehler from the game. Brusdar Graterol came in with no one out and precious little margin for error. When he escaped without damage — in six overpowering pitches, no less — he and Buehler exulted in it:

For a while, it felt like these escapes might be the lasting images of the game. Dustin May came in after Graterol, but after a clean seventh inning, he lost his way in the eighth. He gave up a leadoff double to Marcell Ozuna, a scorching line drive to the wall. He intentionally walked Dansby Swanson (a wild sentence to write) to bring up pinch hitter Pablo Sandoval, then hit Sandoval with a 2-0 pitch.

It was time, once again, for an escape act. Dave Roberts turned to Victor González, a converted starter with a heavy sinker and wipeout slider. González made Charlie Culberson (yeah, the Braves went deep into the bench on this one, more on that later) look lost. He threw a sinker that Culberson was late on for strike one, then a slider that Culberson was way out in front of for strike two. After Culberson spoiled another slider with an emergency swing, González buried a third straight slider and celebrated appropriately:

There’s no real logic to the thought that a team that squanders chances is going to inevitably lose. A 1-1 game heading into the ninth inning is roughly a 50-50 proposition. Don’t tell our fallible brains that, however. I, a theoretically rational observer, was ready to write a recap of the Braves squandering their chances and the Dodgers, inevitably, converting some nonsense string of grounders, walks, and bloops into an unsatisfying end to a tense duel where Atlanta had all the chances. I was ready to show, in essence, endless loops of this:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The Braves didn’t need any of that high-wire act to hold the Dodgers to a lone run over the first eight innings. Max Fried is an ace, and he looked the part today. He struck out nine Dodgers over six strong innings while walking only two. The only damage came on an Enrique Hernández home run in the fifth.

Chris Martin followed with a perfect seventh. Will Smith (the Atlanta pitcher, not the Los Angeles catcher) was just as good in the eighth, despite a defensive alignment that could best be described as “oh please, not like this”:

Adam Duvall left in the first inning after feeling a twinge in his back. Cristian Pache, his replacement, was pulled for Sandoval’s pinch hit appearance. Culberson then replaced Markakis for platoon reasons, which left the Braves fielding a lineup of castoffs and out-of-position bats.

Yes, the Dodgers’ victory was preordained. Only, baseball doesn’t work that way. Blake Treinen, the team’s most recent reclamation project, came in for the ninth. Austin Riley proved how ephemeral “the way things feel like they should go” is right away:

Those images of celebrating Dodgers that dominated the early innings? They don’t count for anything. There’s no scoreboard for positive emotions shown after a big play, though Riley was no slouch there either:

Even as he took a fake selfie with Ozuna in the dugout, the game felt over. It wasn’t over, of course — a one run lead is one cement-mixer slider away from a tie game, even in cavernous Arlington. A few minutes later, however, it was over for real. Ronald Acuña Jr. smashed a grounder through the infield for a double, and when Ozuna drove him home two batters later, Acuña reveled in the moment:

Atlanta wasn’t done. Ozzie Albies put an exclamation point on the inning with a two-out, two-run shot that somehow landed directly in closer Mark Melancon’s glove:

The Dodgers didn’t make the ninth interesting. They went down in order. That sequence of bloops and baserunning that would have snatched victory from the jaws of defeat was never real. The Braves, who looked like the better team all night, were also the winning team. Sometimes baseball works out that way.

The series will pick back up today, less than 24 hours after Game 1 started. Today’s game won’t affect tomorrow’s in any noticeable way other than reliever usage. The Braves aren’t magically the team of destiny now, though their four-run outburst might give them that aura. The Dodgers aren’t cooked; they’ll send Clayton Kershaw, Atlanta will bring Ian Anderson, and ZiPS thinks Los Angeles is about 60% likely to win the game.

Just because last night’s catharsis won’t carry over into the rest of the series doesn’t mean it doesn’t feel good for Atlanta, though. In a tight Game 1, both teams got their cheering and celebrating in. The Braves simply got to laugh last, and that was the difference.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
v2miccaMember since 2016
5 years ago

As a Braves fan, last night was euphoric for me. But, all it guaranteed the Braves was a minimum of 4 more post season games.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Thats more than most fans can hope for at this point.

JEdwardMember since 2016
5 years ago

Panda at third, Culberson in right, Riley in left. Just like we drew it up in *checks notes* never, we never drew it up like that. Here’s to never seeing that defensive alignment again.

Southi
5 years ago
Reply to  JEdward

You very well could see Panda starting at third and Riley in left some more in this series.

JEdwardMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  Southi

Think that’s very likely. But hopefully, without Culberson in right.

Subway Alum
5 years ago
Reply to  JEdward

The writer here and some of those making comments do both Riley and Culberson a disservice, Riley played competent left field in most of his 2019 appearances, and Culberson, who can play effectively all over the field, made some gave-saving plays in both left and right field in 2019 as a late-innings replacement. He also had some timely hits off the bench. So, Snitker had a solid base of predictive information at his disposal when made those moves. Most of us who have watched the Braves through this shortened season and over the past years had no problem with the moves, made necessary to an extent by Duvall’s early injury. This one came out well; by the law of averages, others won’t–but Snitker knows his personnel and, with an extra arm in the bullpen necessitating an especially short bench, made the right moves.

CindyJNCMember since 2021
5 years ago
Reply to  Subway Alum

Culberson has no business being on the postseason roster and that pitiful at bat showed why. He’s a zero, except that he’s a nice guy and Snit loves him….and so does the average fan. By some miracle, they overcame it….but having an actual major league caliber player on the bench would help.

hughduffy
5 years ago
Reply to  CindyJNC

Culberson is on the postseason roster because he can play every position, most of them competently. He’s a third catcher and a pitcher in a blowout. As a pinch hitter, career wise, he’s above average for hitters coming off the bench. What are the other options? Adeiny Hechavarría, who kept making errors towards the end of the season? Johan Camargo, who looked lost at the plate this year?

I agree, having a major league caliber player on the bench would help, but that not being an option, Culberson will have to do.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  Subway Alum

They are on MLB rosters. I will give them that.

alemunger
5 years ago
Reply to  JEdward

It could have also been Swanson in right and Culberson at short. No one could’ve discerned the difference until a ball was hit to one of them.

bluerum29
5 years ago
Reply to  JEdward

It worked out in the end, but it should have been avoided by Snitker. He waited too long in the 8th to try and manufacture the go ahead run and it didn’t work. Instead all he did was burn his bench and we ended with a poor defensive set up. With a runner on 2nd with nobody out, he should have been trying to get the 1 run at that point without burning the bench.

JEdwardMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  bluerum29

Rare for me, but I’ve got no complaints with anything Snit did last night. Or really, this entire post-season. Think he’s not only made the right calls results wise, but overwhelmingly the right calls process wise as well.

bluerum29
5 years ago
Reply to  JEdward

In a close game (tied at the time) you want to ensure you have quality defensive players in the field. You can’t say that the way we ended defensively wasn’t a little worrisome. As I said, it worked out, but it sure wasn’t played out correctly. The timing of the pinch hitters and how they were used put the defensive positioning in a bind. With a runner on 2nd and nobody out it is a failure to not score. Travis should have done everything he could to move the runner to 3rd and then the next batters job is to get him in.

hughduffy
5 years ago
Reply to  JEdward

Culberson is not great in left field because he has problems going back for the ball, but he has a cannon for an arm and nailed Jorge Alfaro at the plate in a game on 7/7/2019. In his few chances, Culberson has played better in right field. Riley is about a league average outfielder, and Panda can still play a league average 3B defensively.

You don’t want to have to do it, because they haven’t done it an awful lot lately, but it was in the back of the play book. Really far back in the play book, but it was there.

v2miccaMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  hughduffy

It was a huge risk/reward move by Snit. Just odd in that the gamble neither payed off, nor did it bite them in the ass. If you can break even on a risky bet, thank your lucky stars and move on.

bluerum29
5 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Exactly. Ideally he makes moves that don’t create so much of a defensive risk in future games. The issue was created by not moving Ozuna to third when Travis was up. Manufacture that run.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

Fried’s breaking stuff was crushing the Dodgers around the 2nd-4th inning or so. You know how hard it is to hold the Dodgers to one run in six innings? And holding them to 1 run over 9 is better than any Braves fan could have realistically hoped for.

Realistically the Braves need another 3 performances somewhere in the series where the starter holds the Dodgers to 2 or 3 runs in the first five or six innings. How realistic is that? I’m thinking it is not, but having Game 1 helps them a lot!

v2miccaMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Last night was the best curve ball I have seen from Fried all season. Dodgers would lay off of it and he would drop it in for a strike. Dodgers would chase it when he had it falling off the table. The Lefties in the Dodger lineup in particular struggled with it.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Does Fried only throw a curveball or does he throw other breaking stuff too? Obviously the curveballs were awesome, and I knew he threw them before but it looked like he had a different breaking ball as well to keep hitters off balance.

The whole performance was just savage.

Chad
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He started throwing his slider more as 2019 went on and it looks like a potentially plus pitch. He seemed to throw it more last night (especially to lefties) than I’ve ever seen him throw it before but I haven’t seen a pitch mix breakdown for him yet.

v2miccaMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

His pitch mix since becoming a starter tends to be 52% Fastball, 23% Curve, 20% Slider, and 5% change-up. Though he has increased his breaking pitch usage this post-season.
I don’t see his slider as an elite pitch like his curve, but it plays very well off of his curve.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Thanks Chad & v2micca. I thought those were sliders!

hughduffy
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Last night’s pitch mix from Fried:
39% (37) four-seam fastball
31% (30) curveball
21% (20) slider
7% (7) sinker
2% (2) changeup

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It happens all the time lol. He got some advantageous calls as is usually going to be the case when a pitch is that successful. Credit for a good night though.

cpinyan
5 years ago

Zack Hample believes that Melancon’s ideas are intriguing, and he’d like to subscribe to his newsletter.

D-WizMember since 2019
5 years ago

It was kind of surreal to watch the Braves dominate this game (insofar as a baseball game can be “dominated”) yet repeatedly fail to capitalize on the chances they gave themselves, and then… actually win it in the end! Felt like the Dodgers would somehow pull this one out and then cruise through the rest of the series. Hopefully this means we’re in for a competitive, dramatic series!

Subway Alum
5 years ago
Reply to  D-Wiz

Leaving an inordinate number of men on base has been a hallmark of Braves baseball for years. But they never quit, keep plugging away, and often in end manage to get the runs in. The difference this season over the recent past is that the bullpen is at top efficiency now. That’s something Braves fans aren’t used to seeing. Coupled with the resurgent starting pitching and the energy with which the Braves play, this just could be a fitting 25th anniversary for the 1995 team and its sterling starting pitching.

v2miccaMember since 2016
5 years ago

Might be interesting to note, that in a segment Mark DeRosa did right before game one, he noted that as dominant as the Dodger’s Line-up has been all year long, the one area where they appeared mortal was hitting against left-handed breaking pitches. They hit .202 slugged .339 and whiffed 37% of the time. This may have been a case of the Braves just leading with the Dodger’s one weak spot.

pepper69funMember since 2020
5 years ago

Next time Fangraphs does a…. we are almost broke and need money article……if you title that article….”Oh please, not like this” …… then you’re going to collect more money from Matrix fans than you dreamed possible

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  pepper69fun

This is……..an interesting………..stream of consciousness approach………my hovercraft is full of eels.

Southi
5 years ago

In his 9th inning at bat, right before he homered, Riley took a 0-2 slider that was a bit low and outside. I remarked to my wife that he appeared to be a bit more “locked in” than in some of his previous at bats and that Riley could hit the ball a long way if Treinen made a mistake. Of course I was in total gleeful shock when that happened the very next pitch. I think Treinen tried to replicate the first slider but just left it too much over the plate. I understand sequencing, but attempting to replicate the same pitch twice in a row proved catastrophic this time for the Dodgers relief pitcher.

jtricheyMember since 2021
5 years ago
Reply to  Southi

I mentioned the same thing and how I was surprised Riley actually laid off it. I said Treinen should throw the same pitch again. He did not (I don’t think it was the home run was on a slider) Gameday says the ball was a 88 MPH slider, the HR came on a 98 MPH sinker.

connjc
5 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

The home run was off a fastball. His fastball didn’t have the movement last night that it does when he is on. And yes I agree, he should’ve thrown another slider there. Hindsight is 20-20 though. Of course they may have been going fastball to set up a slider on the next pitch and just mislocated it, but I guess we won’t know that.

hughduffy
5 years ago
Reply to  Southi

The pitch Riley hit was a 98 mph sinker. Treinen buried sinkers down and in for the first and third pitches of the at-bat, but his fifth sinker ended up middle-middle at the plate.

v2miccaMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  hughduffy

Yep, announcers were even talking about it during the replay, how is should have been more at the shin level but Treinen just left it up.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Southi

I thought the Dodger’s game plan with pitching was really strange. Buehler’s leaning on any pitch but his fastball until his final inning being the weirdest one.

hughduffy
5 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Want to stymie the Braves lineup? Throw just enough fastballs to keep ’em honest (about 30-40%), and once you have have them sitting fastball, either land breaking balls in the zone or have them chasing breaking balls in the dirt. That was Trevor Bauer’s game plan, and he pulled it off for 7 2/3 innings.

Buehler’s game plan involved trying to get them to chase fastballs below the zone, and the Braves hitters just weren’t biting.

jtricheyMember since 2021
5 years ago

All 4 hits for the Braves in the 9th came after the hitter was down 0-2. Dodgers did not do a good job staying out of the middle of the plate with 2 strikes in that inning. Why? No idea.
Meanwhile Fried was excellent, but the Brave pen left a few middle middle that all the Dodgers could do was foul off. Why? No idea. (See especially Will Smith’s sliders to Justin Turner in the 8th, pitches 2 and 4 of the at bat)

CindyJNCMember since 2021
5 years ago

Really fun game to watch last night. HATED the injury to Duvall. Really love that guy. I hope Pache is given a chance to start. His defense will more than make up for his lack of hitting…..and it’s not like the Braves have anyone else on the roster who can hit. I’m guessing that Ender will replace Adam. Maybe Ender and Pache can platoon. Just please no Culberson in the OF…..he shouldn’t even be on the roster.

bluerum29
5 years ago
Reply to  CindyJNC

Unfortunately it was Comargo and not Ender.

hughduffy
5 years ago

The one thing that Dave Roberts did that I thought was a mistake was bringing in Jake McGee to face d’Arnaud, Albies, and Swanson. Yes, McGee has been successful against righties, but you turn Albies from his weaker left-handed batting to his far stronger right-handed batting side (career .753 OPS as a LHB vs. career .952 OPS as a RHB). While Albies’s splits this year have been .860 as a LHB and .509 as a RHB this year, that was because he had been dealing with a wrist injury early in the season that shut him down for a month. Also, I guess that home run is confirmation that Albies’s wrist has finally healed up.

Did Roberts not have another right-handed pitcher who could get right handed batters out in the 9th? I think so, but someone correct me if I’m wrong. By bringing in McGee, Roberts ends up using 5 pitchers for the game, or about half the bullpen. He uses a guy who throws mostly four-seam fastballs against a great fastball hitting team. He turns Ozzie Albies over to his dominant hitting side. Treinen didn’t have his best stuff, but that just felt like the wrong move to me.

v2miccaMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  hughduffy

I have to give Roberts a pass on this one as it is an incredibly difficult task to balance the evaluation of a player’s historical trends against his recent trends. Albies has historically been stronger from the right side of the plate, but this season struggled as a right handed hitter due to injuries. Roberts gambled on the recent trend being more relevant.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago

A few questions for the Dodgers:

Why would you go to a reliever in between two starters?

Is May a starter?

How is LAD OK with the lack of innings they are getting from May? If they don’t trust him, they sure use him a lot. He made 10 starts this season ad 2 relief appearances. Why change the role and also under-use him? Innings is what he should be able to provide.

You needed to bring in a lefty to face Markakis? Your superior pitcher just faced the actual threatening part of the order. Walking Swanson was as dumb as it gets. Think about that – they had May walk Swanson just to lift him so Victor Gonzalez could face Markakis. That doesn’t make sense… especiially when you consider that Swanson would have hit with one man on.

Is Graterol their most trusted RP at the moment? He did get his first K yesterday so that is a positive trend.

Are you really trying to use Treinen every day? He has gotten less effective each time and now can’t even consistently get them an inning.

Why are they not using their best players in a tie game late?

Who is their stopper? It was Treinen but you can’t rally be too excited about that. I wonder if Roberts has anything dumb to say about his stuff.

Who is their closer? I figure it might be back to Kenley which is actually the best they can hope for.

LAD can make mistakes and still win but they haven’t done themselves any favors by not trusting the players that got them here. Here they are down in a series for the first time and they are lost.

dodgerbleu
5 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Bringing in May was stupid. Stupid in the moment, moreso now with the Kershaw news. Lot of questionable moves by Roberts. I think it’s safe to say bullpen management is not a strength, and it may be fair to question a basic MLB manager level of competence.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

I think we need an update to “which managers do the best job with their bullpens” articles. At least during his Cardinals time, Mike Matheny was considered the worst, and Girardi was considered pretty good during his Yankees managerial career. But I’d be curious to see where Roberts ranks; it seems like every offseason Dodgers fans tear out their hair with his bullpen management but I don’t hear much about it in the regular season.

connjc
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I am not one of the biggest Roberts haters, but I do get frustrated that all year he shows trust and will mix and match his whole bullpen. But when it comes to the postseason he all of a sudden loses confidence in them all and is only willing to throw a couple guys.

connjc
5 years ago

Kershaw out