Braves Take World Series Lead as Ian Anderson and Friends Chase a No-Hitter
Only two pitchers have ever thrown a postseason no-hitter: the Yankees’ Don Larsen with his perfect game in Game 5 of the 1956 World Series, and the Phillies’ Roy Halladay in the 2010 Division Series opener. On some level, the Braves’ Ian Anderson was vying to be the third; in Game 3 of the World Series on Friday night, he held the Astros hitless through five innings. But even from the start, anybody who has watched this postseason — where starters have averaged a hair over four innings per game — and understands the impact of the year-over-year workload increases that these pitchers are shouldering following the pandemic-shortened 2020 season could have told you that he wouldn’t get a chance to finish the job. That was doubly true on a raw and rainy night in Georgia and with a rested bullpen behind him. Backed by just two runs, Anderson and four relievers carried the no-hitter into the eighth and settled for a two-hit shutout, giving the Braves a 2–1 World Series lead.
Houston’s first hit finally came via a chip shot — 39 degrees, 70.7 mph — into left field by pinch-hitter Aledmys Díaz, the first batter faced by reliever Tyler Matzek. It fell in just in front of left fielder Eddie Rosario; according to Statcast, the catch probability for the play was 85%, but with shortstop Dansby Swanson running toward him and the cost of missing the ball being the tying run in scoring position, Rosario chose not to lay out.
It proved to be the right move. In fact, just about every major move the Braves made in Game 3 proved to be the right one, particularly manager Brian Snitker’s decision to trust his bullpen, no-hitter or not.
On paper, this figured to be a must-win game for the Braves; with season-ending injuries to Huascar Ynoa and Charlie Morton, they knew they would have to piece together back-to-back bullpen games on Saturday and Sunday. What they needed as much as anything from Anderson, who had averaged just four innings in his three previous postseason starts, was some length so as to maximize Snitker’s options in Games 4 and 5.
The 23-year-old rookie — yes, he’s still a rookie, despite having walked through the fire last October as well — was up to the task, though it wasn’t pretty. Neither was the weather. Rain fell all day at Truist Park, and the temperature at first pitch was just 49 degrees, making this the coldest World Series contest since Game 2 at Fenway Park in 2018. The only other time it had been that cold at first pitch in the Fall Classic in Atlanta was for the 1999 opener, when it was also 49 degrees.
Anderson, who threw five shutout innings against the Brewers in Game 3 of the NLDS and bent but didn’t break in two shorter starts against the Dodgers in the NLCS, was shaky from the outset. He sandwiched walks of Jose Altuve and Alex Bregman around a double play off the bat of Michael Brantley and allowed a hard-hit but routine fly ball off the bat of Yordan Alvarez. That out started a string of nine straight batters retired, though the young righty went to three balls on four of them before walking Alvarez with two outs and nobody on in the fourth. He then grazed Carlos Correa‘s jersey for a hit by pitch, but came off the mound to make a good play on Kyle Tucker’s swinging bunt (-68 degree launch angle, two feet!), throwing to first in time to get the slugger.
That inning cost Anderson 26 pitches. Though he recovered with a nine-pitch fifth inning and still had the no-hitter intact, as well as a 1–0 lead, he had thrown just 39 out of 76 pitches for strikes, gone to three-ball counts on eight out of 18 hitters, and had gotten just five swings and misses, with a 29% CSW. Rather than send his starter through the top of the lineup a third time, Snitker had a chance to roll out his expanded A-list bullpen, with A.J. Minter, Luke Jackson, Matzek, and Will Smith taking an inning apiece, and hopefully not overtaxed so as to be unavailable for Game 4.
The decision is no doubt one that frustrates both purists and casual fans; who doesn’t want to see a starter chase the glory of a no-hitter in any game, let alone a postseason one? But what’s left out of the equation, beyond the inevitable third-time-through-the-order calculus, is the reality of just how taxed these pitchers are given the fallout from last season. Anderson is one of four Braves pitchers whose regular-season and postseason innings workload is more than 100 above last year’s total, and the gap would be even larger if he hadn’t spent seven weeks on the injured list due to shoulder inflammation:
| Pitcher | Team | 2020 Reg | 2020 Post | 2021 Reg | 2021 Post | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walker Buehler | LAD | 36.7 | 25.0 | 207.7 | 18.3 | 164.3 |
| Nathan Eovaldi | BOS | 48.3 | 0.0 | 182.3 | 20.7 | 154.7 |
| Luis Garcia | HOU | 12.3 | 2.0 | 155.3 | 13.0 | 154.0 |
| Nick Pivetta | BOS | 15.7 | 0.0 | 155.0 | 13.7 | 153.0 |
| Charlie Morton | ATL | 38.0 | 20.0 | 185.7 | 16.7 | 144.3 |
| Max Scherzer | LAD | 67.3 | 0.0 | 179.3 | 16.7 | 128.7 |
| Julio Urías | LAD | 55.0 | 23.0 | 185.7 | 15.0 | 122.7 |
| Ian Anderson | ATL | 32.3 | 18.7 | 143.0* | 17.0 | 109.0 |
| Max Fried | ATL | 56.0 | 23.7 | 165.7 | 21.7 | 107.7 |
| Drew Smyly | ATL | 26.3 | 0.0 | 126.7 | 4.3 | 104.7 |
| Lance McCullers Jr. | HOU | 55.0 | 14.7 | 162.3 | 10.7 | 103.3 |
| Jake Odorizzi | HOU | 13.7 | 0.0 | 104.7 | 6.3 | 97.3 |
| Zack Greinke | HOU | 67.0 | 14.7 | 171.0 | 2.3 | 91.7 |
As much as the intensity of October baseball, the slim margins for error, and the analytical underpinnings for calling upon fresh relievers instead of tiring starters, I believe that so much of what we’ve seen this fall comes down to how hard these pitchers have been worked relative to 2020. I can’t fault Snitker for pulling Anderson — the youngest of the pitchers above, by the way, and one of six who’s reached a career high in innings as well — and I don’t think it represents an existential crisis for baseball so much as a perfect storm of 2021-specific circumstances that make such decisions relatively easy, particularly with the larger goal of a championship in mind.
Keep in mind that we saw plenty of this in the regular season as well. In addition to the seven official complete-game no-hitters (plus Madison Bumgarner’s seven-inning one), 12 pitchers were pulled having thrown at least five innings with a no-hitter still intact, one more than the previous high, set in 2018. In doing so, Anderson became just the third starting pitcher to depart under such circumstances, after the Mariners’ Paul Abbott in 2001 ALCS Game 4 against the Yankees (he walked eight but didn’t allow a run) and the Tigers’ Anibal Sanchez in 2013 ALCS Game 1 against the Red Sox (he walked six, struck out 12, and burned through 116 pitches).
Anderson departed with that 1–0 lead because Garcia, his opposite number, was wobbly. Though the 24-year-old righty had no trouble finding another gear for his four-seam fastball, which averaged 93.3 mph during the regular season but 95.5 on the night, his command suffered. He netted 11 swings and misses in the first two innings but couldn’t throw his breaking pitches for strikes and went to three balls five times in the first two frames, walking Ozzie Albies with two outs in the first and giving up a 99.1-mph rocket off the bat of Travis d’Arnaud with two outs in the second, a double off the right field wall. Astros manager Dusty Baker followed by ordering an intentional walk of Swanson, batting eighth, after which Garcia struck out Anderson, who is just 2-for-37 with 29 strikeouts in his regular-season career.
The run came in the third. Garcia issued a leadoff walk to Rosario and then served up a single to left-center by Freddie Freeman. He got a much-needed strikeout of Albies via a low changeup, a pitch he hadn’t broken out until the start of the inning, but Austin Riley smoked his cutter down the third base line past a diving Bregman at a 104.7 mph, bringing home Rosario.
Coach Ron Washington held Freeman at third, choosing not to challenge Alvarez’s arm, though this Statcast graphic is probably an overstatement:
Do not run on Yordan Alvarez pic.twitter.com/7cq5uwegaH
— Mike (@gosensgo101) October 30, 2021
Alvarez was playing the outfield to keep his bat in the lineup in the NL park; his 41 games and 39 starts in left field actually dwarfed the totals of his shifted teammates, with Brantley playing just eight games in right and Tucker just four in center, all while flanked by Alvarez and Brantley. Even with the grim weather and wet field, their relative inexperience in that configuration wasn’t a factor.
Anyway, Garcia then walked Jorge Soler to load the bases, prompting a visit from pitching coach Brent Strom. He got Adam Duvall to pop out in foul ground, then struck out d’Arnaud on a check-swing cutter — the fourth check-swing the Astros’ starter generated, but the first call on one that went his way. After getting outs with each of his first two pitches in the fourth inning — a pop foul to the catcher and a soft liner to first base — Garcia was done for the night just the same, lifted after 72 pitches and two full trips through the order in favor of lefty Blake Taylor, who gave up a single to Rosario but struck out Freeman.
The Braves got something going in the fifth against Yimi García after the righty had needed just three pitches to get the first two outs against Albies and Riley. Soler walked again, and Duvall hit a hot shot to the left of second base that Altuve was able to backhand, preventing Soler from taking third, but his looping, off-balance throw was off the mark, and Duvall was safe with an infield single. García recovered to get d’Arnaud to ground out to Gurriel at first, keeping the deficit at one run.
For the Braves, Minter and Jackson kept the no-hitter intact, with the former working around a two-out plunking of Bregman’s left ankle. Matzek, the team’s best and most heavily used reliever in the postseason, came on for the eighth to face Martín Maldonado, but Baker opted for the pinch-hitter Díaz instead. After getting ahead 2–1, Díaz dunked his shot into left field, ending what was the longest no-hit bid in a World Series game since 1967:
Per the great @SlangsOnSports, the Braves are the first team to not allow a hit through 7 innings of a World Series game since the Red Sox in Game 2 of the 1967 World Series (Jim Lonborg, 7 2/3 innings). That's the deepest a WS no-no has gone since Don Larsen’s perfect game.
— Mark Feinsand (@Feinsand) October 30, 2021
Pinch-runner Jose Siri did get into scoring position, stealing second with two outs and advancing to third when Swanson couldn’t come up with d’Arnaud’s low throw and the ball squirted into center field. Matzek stranded him there by getting Brantley to pop out.
With that reprieve, the Braves finally expanded their lead with two outs in the eighth, when d’Arnaud launched a 437-foot blast to dead center off off a Kendall Graveman fastball, the catcher’s second homer in as many games.
In the ninth, the Astros collected their second hit via Bregman’s shift-aided single off Smith, bringing the tying run to the plate, but the Braves’ closer retired Alvarez on a first-pitch pop foul, then dispatched Correa and Tucker on four pitches apiece.
The Braves got the leg up that they needed so badly. Snitker may not be able to call upon all four of his relievers for Game 4, as Minter threw 17 pitches, Matzek 15, Smith 14, and Jackson 11, but they helped to put the team in a good position as this series takes its next turn.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
#ChopOn
@howieloader Stop being a racist tool.
@josh stop being soooo politically correct.
I didn’t realize World Series no hitters were so rare, for one
I really enjoy these fangraphs recaps; they’re better than anything I read on ESPN or Braves blogs. Thanks!
Re: the note about d’Arnaud’s checked swing being the first to go the Astros’ way: Rosario led off the game for the Braves by striking out on a (bad) checked swing call.
I was half asleep by this point in the game, but I think there was another one in the second as well that went against the Braves.
Speaking of which, can we please talk about these outrageously late start times in the postseason? If you want to grow the sport, starting the biggest games of the year after all the east coast kids have gone to bed is ridiculous. The west coasters can record the game to watch from the beginning when they get home, but us here in the east are feeling a little put out. Even an hour earlier would make a huge difference.
Is it the late start times or Dusty Baker’s endless mid inning pitching changes? They drive me crazy.
MLB does not care. Dated blackout rules for mlb.tv, division series games on obscure networks, late start times. Real dumb.
I don’t think there’s any doubt that Snitker will call on all four of his top relievers if tonight’s bullpen game is close (and if it’s not, he won’t use them & they’ll be ok for games 5, 6, and 7). He said after the LCS that he had ridden his top relievers hard and would continue to do so. None of them pitched in game 2 on Wednesday, and Thursday was an off day, so they all had two days of rest before Friday, and pitching them two days in a row isn’t that much. At some point it’ll catch up with them, but with no more than four games left in the season and only two wins needed, the gamble seems worth it.
Yeah but soon that debt is going to have to be paid. Those four arms are a finite resource and each time you use those guys, they become less effective — especially with back to back bullpen games looming.
Maddon nearly flushed a World Series down the toilet by running Chapman into the ground later in the series in games 5, 6, and 7 and it looks like a certainty that Snitker is gonna do the same.
Chapman’s usage over the last 3 games of that World Series was 42 pitches over 2.2 innings in Game 5, then off day, then 20 pitches over 1.1 innings in Game 6, then 35 pitches over 1.1 innings in Game 7. So Chapman threw almost 100 pitches in 3 games over 4 days, all multi-inning appearances. Maddon lost trust in his other relievers and therefore tried to rely heavily on just Chapman.
I’m not seeing evidence, at least so far, that Snitker is in the same mindset. He’s dividing the late inning load among 4 relievers in close games.
Smith and Jackson are essentially being used as 1 inning pitchers: neither has thrown more than 20 pitches in a game this postseason. (Jackson did so over 1.2 innings in Game 1 of the World Series. Smith hasn’t pitched more than 1 inning in any of his postseason appearances.) Matzek has made three 1+ inning appearances (topping out at 2 innings) but hasn’t thrown more than 26 pitches in a game this postseason. Minter’s had a pair of 2-inning appearances and had 1 longer appearance (43 pitches over 2.2 innings in Game 1 of the World Series) but then had 2 days off before pitching an inning in Game 3.
Yeah but pitching all four guys every day is a recipe for disaster. Not only does fatigue set in but the best offense in baseball gets more and more looks at a tired arm. Almost all series throughout the season are three games, so hitters don’t get too many multiple looks at relievers in a regular season series but in an up to 7 game series, it might get ugly. One if not several of those guys is gonna crack.
Yes, but pitching all four guys every game – even from here on out – would be a change to how they’ve been used so far.
None of them has pitched on 3 straight days this postseason.
Matzek has pitched 4 times in 5 days on two occasions this postseason (once each in the NLDS and NLCS). Jackson has also done so once (in the NLDS). On all of those occasions they had at least 2 days off before and after the stretch of pitching in 4 games in 5 days. Smith and Minter haven’t ever pitched 4 times in 5 days this postseason.
So continuing to use these pitchers the way they’ve been used would be along the lines of potentially using each of them in either Game 4 or Game 5 of the World Series – but not both – and then thinking they can be available for both Games 6 and Game 7 if necessary. And also limiting them to about an inning per appearance if they’re going to pitch 3 times in 4 days. And also figuring that you’re not going to get a 35 to 40 pitch outing if they’re pitching on back-to-back days.
If they were really pitching every day like they did last year, that would be a recipe for (eventual) disaster, but there are enough off days and blowouts in which they don’t pitch that they may be ok for the next few games. For now, they certainly seem to be better options in a close game than the rest of the Braves bullpen. That said, the four have been overperforming/lucky in the postseason so far, so it wouldn’t be surprising if one or two has a poor outing sometime in the next few games.
One of the worst managerial decisions, in a career full of them, was when Collins used Familia, far and away his best reliever, in a 9-3 blowout in Game 3 in 2015. When called upon in the 8th in Game 4 he gave up the key hits. What makes these managers think these men are machines?
I’ve yet to read a study indicating that an innings pitched increase from year 1 to year 2 makes a pitch less effective or durable compared to a control group with the same IP and same age in year 2 but without the innings increase.
It’s also a bit odd to add minor league rehab innings but ignore alternate site “innings.” It’s not as if Anderson was just sitting around last year waiting to pitch in the big leagues.
This is a great point.
Good writeup but I will disagree about the availability of the relievers today. I’m willing to bet that everyone is available.
I agree. All 4 of the Atlanta relievers used last night had 2 days of rest prior to Game 3. (None of those 4 pitchers had pitched in Game 2.) They each pitched 1 inning with modest pitch counts (as noted in Jay’s last paragraph). I expect all of them to be available for Game 4 and likely used if the game is close.
I expect the Braves will try – depending a bit on how Game 4 goes – to keep at least 1 (and possibly 2) of Smyly, Wright, and Davidson available for bulk innings in Game 5.
No to Frowny.
If they can get Atlanta a third win tonight, of course they’ll pitch. Only a blowout prevents at least two getting in.
Didn’t Garcia get a questionable check swing called his way on the first batter of the game, on a 3-2 count?
Edit: nevermind. This was referring to just this AB. I’m an idiot. But Rosario still didn’t swing.
After Game 3 interview:
Ken Rosenthal: “What will you tell Brian Snitker about your readiness for tomorrow and beyond?”
Tyler Matzek: “No, the boys are all ready. We’re all ready down there. Night shift’s ready.”
For Game 4 at least, all the Braves bullpen wants the call.
To be fair, unless they have a sense that they are hurt, this is probably what they’ll always say. It’s the same principle as the starter who insists he can go another inning or two at a mound conference. Or Brady Singer cursing at the rain.
(although I do agree with everyone else that their availability should not be in question in Game 4)
Yeah, I thought it showed unusual maturity for Scherzer to say after NLCS game 2 that the way he was pitching, the LHP who replaced him (Vesia) had a better chance to get the upcoming Braves LH batters out than he did, and later that he wasn’t ready to be the best option for game 6. Probably easier for a veteran who’s had lots of success and has a ring to admit this than an hard-throwing reliever who’s not that far removed from pitching for the Texas Air Hogs.
I caught that also and enjoyed that they are called the “night shift”. They need to adopt the Commodores song.
There is absolutely no reason to believe any of those four pitchers, who previously had 2 days off, could not pitch today. Tyler Matzek threw 64 pitches in games 1-3 against the Brewers (at least 19 each game), and then 15 more in game 4. The only thing more impressive than his ginormous balls is his rubber arm.
I honestly believe that “tired bullpens”* is the most talked about thing compared to how big of a factor it is. Has anyone ever shown it to really be a thing, empirically?
*Or “tired arm barns” if you prefer.
I can’t recall where I’ve seen it, but there was some study that looked at how effective relievers are when used multiple days in a row. If I recall correctly, relievers are generally less effective when they are used more than 2 consecutive days in a row, so it is the third day where their effectiveness is noticeably worse. Some relievers (sinkerballers, I think) were better if they did not have too many days in a row of rest.
While I don’t think it will be a factor for Game 4, it could be a factor in Game 5 if they are pitched 3 days in a row. And that can also happen due to seeing the same relievers multiple times in a short span of time.
I mostly agree. It makes for a good narrative, and I believe that bullpen fatigue exists in general. But in a playoff series, a “gassed” bullpen throwing some really good innings is probably only marginally less likely than that same bullpen giving up a bunch of runs.
Basically, if you started this series thinking that Atlanta’s bullpen was 50% likely to shut down the Houston offense in any given game, you should now think that they’re maybe 45% likely to do so in Game 4. Maybe as low as 40% if you’re especially worried. Which is actually a pretty big swing as baseball odds go, but also not a big enough difference that you should be particularly surprised if we see a masterful bullpen game. (ALCS Game 4 was a great example of this).
Baseball, and especially playoff baseball, is like that – nothing moves the needle all that much in a short series. Whether the narrative ends up being “Atlanta leaned too heavily on their overworked bullpen” or “Atlanta’s bullpen dug deep and brought home the trophy” is mostly a crapshoot. Either way, I don’t think we’ll learn much of anything about bullpen usage in the playoffs that would have predictive value when we’re having this exact conversation next October.
I don’t think there’s any question that there’s a threshold where pitchers are gassed, their stuff is worse, and they’re not getting outs the same way they were before. But I don’t know of any work where that threshold is, and I don’t really think this is it.
I would also assume there is some variation by pitcher. Scott Proctor had a year where he had 83 appearances and over 100 innings. Apparently, Cashman actually confronted the pitcher and Joe Torre, asking them both to please make sure he got some rest. But at least for that season, he was okay, and it’s possible he could have done even more. But I also would also expect he’s a bit of an outlier.
Also, like all pitcher usage, that Scott Proctor-like usage was a lot more common back before half the bullpen was tossing upper-90s heat and the other half was getting way down to have a deceptive approach angle. Mike Marshall had a season (I just looked it up) in 1974 where he had 106 appearances and 208 innings. He was a bit of an outlier in his own era (from 1950 forward, I don’t think anyone else both appeared in more than 95 games and threw more than 95 innings). But he did have two other seasons with more than 90 appearances and over 140 innings. Kent Tekulve had a couple of 90-appearance seasons too. It wasn’t that rare to have guys appearing in 80 games.
In recent years, there was still a few guys who appeared a lot and averaged about an inning per appearance or more in the mid 2000s (Paul Quantrill and Salomon Torres are the two that come to mind) but the practice appears to have almost entirely disappeared by 2012. From 2012 to 2019, there were only 12 single-season performances where someone had more than 80 games, none of them were repeats by the same reliever, and some of them were LOOGY types (Alex Claudio, Zach Duke). Again, I think that this has a lot to do with the fact that when relievers are throwing this hard or getting down so far to create a flat approach angle that it’s just too difficult to leave them in or keep trotting them back out.