The Incredible Shrinking Postseason Starter

Don’t blame the Dodgers. Or don’t just blame the Dodgers. While the defending champions used Corey Knebel as an opener in back-to-back postseason games to finish the Division Series and begin the League Championship Series (albeit under very different circumstances), starting pitchers throughout this postseason are throwing fewer innings than ever. Thus far this October, starts of three innings or fewer outnumber those of six innings or more by 60%! More than one-third of all starting pitchers are getting the hook before they reach double digits in outs, and even the aces aren’t pitching deep into games as frequently.

Sunday night’s NLCS Game 2 between the Braves and Dodgers provided yet another example. Before Ian Anderson even recorded an out, he was down 2-0 thanks to a Mookie Betts single and a Corey Seager homer. He faced seven batters in the first inning, and while he had a 1-2-3 second, he put two men on in the third, after which manager Brian Snitker elected to pull him for a pinch-hitter.

Opposite number Max Scherzer, after being pushed back a day due to his Division Series Game 5-saving effort, held the Braves scoreless through three innings but walked Austin Riley and then gave up a titanic game-tying homer to Joc Pederson in the fourth; when the lineup turned over after he recorded his first out of the fifth, manager Dave Roberts pulled him in favor lefty Alex Vesia — the second time in three postseason starts that Scherzer has exited before completing five innings. For as much of an affront as this might have been to purists, the 37-year-old future Hall of Famer conceded afterwards, “My arm was dead. I could tell when I was warming up that it was still tired… I wasn’t going to be able to get truly deep into a game, and I wasn’t going to be able to get to that 95, 100-pitch count.”

It’s not just the teams that are on the short end of postseason series that are pulling their starters early. The Red Sox made it past the 100-win Rays in the Division Series despite getting three starts of fewer than three innings, two of them from staff ace Chris Sale (the Rays, for their part, got more than three innings out of their starter in just one out of the four games). The Dodgers won the NL Wild Card game and then eked out a five-game Division Series win despite only getting starts of six innings or longer in their two losses to the Giants. Here’s how the 10 postseason teams stack up:

Postseason Starts, Short and Long
Team 3 IP or Fewer 6 IP or More Status
Rays 3 0 Lost ALDS
Astros 3 1 In ALCS
Red Sox 3 0 In ALCS
Dodgers 2 2 In NLCS
White Sox 2 0 Lost ALDS
Giants 1 2 Lost NLDS
Yankees 1 0 Lost WC
Braves 1 3 In NLCS
Brewers 0 2 Lost NLDS
Cardinals 0 0 Lost WC
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference

Three of the four remaining teams have combined to get one start of six innings or longer in a victory thus far. That one belongs to Lance McCullers Jr., who tossed 6.2 shutout innings for the Astros against the White Sox in the Division Series opener. That McCullers was left off the ALCS roster due to forearm discomfort and might be done for the year might only be a coincidence, but with a career-high 162.1 innings under his belt, and a 107.1-inning increase from last year’s workload, it’s also possible that he went a bridge too far.

Starting pitchers working short in October isn’t exactly a new development, of course. I’ve been tracking the postseason usage patterns of starters in this space for the past few years, noting the extent to which they parallel what we’re seeing in the regular season. But what we’ve seen lately are things we haven’t seen before, namely the length of the average start dipping below five innings, and starters’ share of innings collectively dipping below 56% (i.e., five innings per nine).

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Both of those eye-opening developments had something to do with the conditions under which teams played during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. The combination of larger rosters and a shortened second preseason (a.k.a. summer camp) meant pitchers and pitching changes galore; at the start of the season, teams were allowed to carry 30 players, and even in the postseason, they could carry 28. Concerns about ramping up pitcher workloads from last year’s 60-game seasons back to 162-game seasons led many teams to dial down pitch counts and innings totals this year, with some even deploying six-man rotations; the overall share of starts made on five or more days of rest jumped from 55.6% in 2019 to 63.8% in ’21.

Here’s a look at how regular season starting pitcher usage has evolved over the past seven regular seasons:

Starting Pitcher Regular Season Performance 2015-21
Season IP/GS Change Starter IP% K% BB% HR/9 ERA ERA- FIP FIP-
2015 5.81 -2.60% 65.0% 19.5% 7.10% 1.06 4.10 103 4.03 102
2016 5.65 -2.80% 63.3% 20.2% 7.70% 1.24 4.34 104 4.30 103
2017 5.51 -2.40% 61.9% 20.6% 8.10% 1.34 4.49 103 4.48 103
2018 5.36 -2.80% 59.9% 21.6% 8.00% 1.21 4.19 101 4.21 101
2019 5.18 -3.40% 57.9% 22.3% 7.70% 1.44 4.54 101 4.51 100
2020 4.78 -7.70% 55.5% 22.9% 8.30% 1.3 4.46 100 4.46 100
2021 5.02 5.10% 57.3% 22.6% 7.80% 1.33 4.34 102 4.30 101

Strictly speaking, the sub-five-inning average proved to be transient, but starters still worked less than ever over the course of a full season. Keep in mind that rosters were still just 25 players in 2019; that extra pitcher this year — or pitchers, since the churning of optionable relievers at the bottom of the bullpen food chain has become more pervasive — has made a difference in cutting into starter workloads.

Against that backdrop, the length of the average start in October 2021 hasn’t just dipped below five innings, it’s plummeting towards four:

Regular vs. Postseason Start Length 2015-21
Year Reg IP/GS Post IP/GS Dif
2015 5.81 5.51 -5.2%
2016 5.65 5.11 -9.6%
2017 5.51 4.73 -14.1%
2018 5.36 4.68 -12.7%
2019 5.18 5.14 -0.9%
2020 4.78 4.40 -8.0%
2021 5.02 4.07 -19.1%

Starters have averaged fewer than five innings in three Octobers out of the past four; the 2019 postseason, with the likes of Gerrit Cole, Justin Verlander, Stephen Strasburg, and Scherzer leading the way, was the exception. This year, the gap between regular season innings and postseason innings is the largest it’s been during this stretch (it might be the largest ever, but I didn’t check).

What’s more, this is the second postseason in a row where relievers have thrown the majority of innings:

Regular vs. Postseason Starter Innings Share 2015-21
Year Reg Starter IP% Post Starter IP% Dif
2015 65.0% 60.5% -4.5%
2016 63.3% 56.8% -6.5%
2017 61.9% 53.5% -8.5%
2018 59.9% 50.3% -9.6%
2019 57.9% 57.7% -0.2%
2020 55.5% 49.9% -5.6%
2021 57.3% 46.0% -11.3%

As to the actual performances of this year’s postseason starters, as a group they’re not as terrible as the low innings totals suggest:

Postseason Starting Pitcher Performance 2015-21
Season GS IP IP/GS Pit/GS BF/GS 6+ IP% 3- IP% ERA FIP R/GS
2015 72 396.7 5.51 88.4 22.8 50.0% 12.5% 4.33 4.17 2.85
2016 70 357.7 5.11 82.6 21.1 34.3% 10.0% 3.88 3.86 2.29
2017 76 359.7 4.73 79.6 19.9 32.9% 19.7% 4.08 4.32 2.33
2018 66 309.0 4.68 75.2 19.5 28.8% 22.7% 3.90 3.96 2.08
2019 74 380.0 5.14 84.9 21.4 44.6% 13.5% 3.36 3.91 2.09
2020 106 466.3 4.40 75.6 18.8 26.4% 23.6% 4.25 4.55 2.20
2021 46 187.0 4.07 68.7 17.2 21.7% 34.8% 4.19 3.40 1.91
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference
2021 through games of October 2017 (two games of ALCS and NLCS). 6+ IP% = percentage of starts lasting six or more innings. 3- IP% = percentage of starts lasting three or fewer innings.

By ERA, the postseason starters don’t look great, though their ERA is 0.15 lower than in the regular season; last year it was 0.21 lower, but in 2019 it was 1.08 lower. But where starters have generally outperformed their peripherals in recent years, that hasn’t been the case thus far.

As noted near the beginning of this piece, more than a third of all postseason starts are ending after three innings or fewer; that’s up 47% relative to last year, which set a record for such things, and 53% over 2018, if you prefer an apples-to-apples comparison regarding playoff formats and full seasons. Meanwhile, where half of all postseason starts lasted six or more innings as recently as 2015, and spiked above 44% in ’19, they’re less than half as frequent this year:

Back to the table above, it’s worth calling attention to two columns. First, note that the average number of batters faced has fallen towards and now below 18. Managers are making the call to the bullpen right around the time their starters turn over the lineup, giving them fewer chances to get knocked around while going trough the order a third time. This number has been trending downward during the regular season as well, with the average starter facing 22.7 batters in 2018, 22.1 in ’19, 20.4 last year, and 21.3 this year. During the regular season, starters may still face the meat of the order a third time with some regularity, but fewer and fewer are getting that chance in October, even with fifth starters left off the rosters or consigned to bullpen duty.

Second, note the R/GS column, the average number of runs surrendered per start. We don’t often see run prevention expressed this way; it’s almost universally prorated per nine innings. But what we’re seeing here is that increasingly, managers are preemptively pulling their starters before the opposition can put up big innings; once you’ve given up that second run, there’s a good chance your night is almost done.

As to why all of this is happening, it’s probably a combination of factors. With so many pitchers having increased their year-over-year workloads by over 100 innings — Scherzer by 112, Max Fried by 109.2, Julio Urías by 130.2, Charlie Morton by 147.2, and Walker Buehler by 170, and that’s just in the NLCS — we’re probably seeing teams exercise more caution than they would outside the shadow of the pandemic, particularly given the increased injury rates we saw this year. As The Athletic’s Jayson Stark recently wrote while citing data from Baseball Prospectus‘ Derek Rhoads, “Teams had to use the non-COVID-19 IL for pitchers an incredible 534 times this season. That’s up an astonishing 44 percent from both 2019 (370) and 2018 (367). The math works out to about 18 pitchers heading for the IL per team!”

Beyond the injury factor, the structure of the postseason, with its extra off days, allows for heavier reliance upon bullpens, particularly early in the playoffs, before teams have reached the portion of seven-game series where they play three in a row. That point begins this week, so we may see these downward usage trends abate a bit. With larger bullpens than existed two years ago being applied to the more familiar postseason format (as opposed to last year’s extra round), managers can be more liberal with their bullpen usage.

Like so much else in today’s game, this trend offends purists, and probably isn’t great for captivating casual fans who tune in at this time of year to see star pitchers doing what they do best rather than the endless parade of relievers. Still, this isn’t 1968 or 2001, and particularly with the pandemic-shortened season looming in the background, we’re unlikely to see a drastic change as the remainder of this postseason plays out.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
4 years ago

I try to be open minded about the progression of the game, but this is something that’s always gonna bother me. Let ‘em rip!

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Makes for a less entertaining product.

Much like the situation the NBA faced some years back when the Pistons were winning championships playing physical defense and winning low scoring games.

SæderMember since 2024
4 years ago

haha. Maybe then it’s not a coincidence that I both really enjoy baseball today AND absolutely loved the 2004 Pistons when I was a teenager and still cared about the NBA. Ben Wallace was my favorite player back then. So much energy and hustle!

I’m just a weirdo

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Sæder

I think he means the late 80s Pistons?

fbMember since 2020
4 years ago

agreed soddingjunkmail. completely get the analytics behind it, but it’s just not as fun to watch. wonder what (if anything) mlb will do about it. can’t outlaw hand-checks in baseball…

federmansam
4 years ago

the team that can break this trend without giving up too many runs is the one that will win the world series every year. it’s why i was so high on the brewers, i thought their pitching would be able to carry them. they had it through two games, 2 6 inning performances, combined 4 runs allowed by team. but the offense couldn’t score. an average mlb offense probably would easily win the series in 3 with that pitching.

there’s probably not a team like that this year at this point

i look back at how the 2019 nats got depth from their starters and consistently. not always 6 and 7, but almost always at least 5, and it protected the bullpen, which danced through the raindrops to a world series

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  federmansam

I’m not sure about the other three teams but the Astros’ rotation is in tatters right now. They’ve got a tied series but with McCullers and Garcia hurt and Valdez not looking too sharp right now they’re going to need Urquidy, Greinke, Odorizzi, and Javier to step up. Pressly-Graveman-Stanek-Maton range from good enough to dominant but that’s only four innings on a regular basis, and the other guys are more specialists. They do not want to get caught having Yimi Garcia pitch to tough left handed batters like Schwarber or Devers.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  federmansam

The other way to break the trend would be for relievers to be terrible their 4th time facing the opponent. I’m not seeing how that’s different from seeing the starter 3 times in the same game. Relievers don’t even have the as broad of a repertoire

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  federmansam

In hindsight they broke Strass and Corbin during that 2019 postseason. Flags fly forever, so its hard to argue against, but we have paid for it since.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I’m glad I’m not the only one noticing this. Teams are giving starters the hook exceptionally early. Someone on another thread posited that teams that are already conservative about letting a batter face guys 3x through the order are suddenly being conservative about 2x through the order. This seems to me to be related to, but slightly different, than planning for a bullpen game.

Of course, there have also been a lot of piggyback starter type situations, so it’s a weird situation of not trusting your starters but also not trusting your relievers either.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Mmhmm. The Dodgers are carrying nine relievers, but what’s the point if you only trust Scherzer and Urias in a tight spot? 3, 4, 5 of those relievers seem like they are “we are never using this guy under any circumstances”…in which case, why burn the roster spot?

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Probably for low leverage innings or the 20th inning, but there haven’t been any.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

The 5th starter has to be on the roster in case the game goes 13+. Eovaldi in 2018 was able to go on and on after all the short men were used up, but why there are mop up men who will never see a high leverage situation is bizarre. As has been already shown, Urias last night for instance, their key men are going to be called on for extra duty in all those high leverage spots negating any need for more than 10 pitchers.

Dave TMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Per my comment above, the Dodgers have already used more than 10 pitchers in the first 2 games of the NLCS. The total will be 12 once Buehler starts Game 3.

Dave TMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

The Dodgers have, by my count, used 11 of the 13 pitchers on their roster in the first 2 games of the NLCS.

Buehler didn’t pitch in either game, and he’s scheduled to start Game 3. The one other pitcher who they didn’t use in either game is Evan Phillips.

That’s with 2 games that were both close, 9-inning games.

It’s fair to debate specific choices of how often to use certain pitchers, but the Dodgers clearly don’t have “3, 4, 5” relievers who they’ll only use in low-leverage situations or extended extra inning games. They’ve already used more relievers than that without those circumstances.

synco
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That was me. Thanks for the call back 🙂

To me it seems more fear-based than anything. As you noted in the same thread, managers seem to be terrified that they’re going to leave their starters in too long, so they’re pulling them at the first sign of trouble. What that’s forcing bullpens to do is to go 5+ innings night after night, which is not sustainable. Sooner or later you have to let your starters try to work their way out of trouble, or everyone’s going to break.

The Dodgers in particular are having this issue. I wonder if the fact that they have such a strong bullpen is actually creating a bit of a logical fallacy in their brains. “We’ve got all these guys, so it’s okay if we have to go to the bullpen early.” Sure, if you’re doing that once every three or four games. It’s not okay if you’re doing it every night. Max Scherzer has made three starts this postseason. His postseason ERA is 2.16 and his WHIP is 0.90. There’s no sane world in which two of his starts should have been only 4.1 innings. Stop screwing around with him, put him on his schedule and let him throw.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  synco

But then we can’t use him the next night, and the one after that!! /s

SæderMember since 2024
4 years ago

I’ll lean into the assessment that this may just be a one-time blip in the game due to the oddities of the COVID-19 pandemic: hard to expect baseball as usual after an unusual season in 2020.

I wonder if there’s a comparison to be made to the WW2 era when many players were enlisted. Or during and after the strike shortened seasons in the 1990s and prior.

I also wonder if this may yet compound with possible CBA changes and/or strike-shortened 2022+ seasons.

Hope Jay will be documenting this baseball history for us to re-visit in 2025!

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Sæder

That doesn’t explain the use of Urias and Scherzer to relieve between starts nor the increased number of innings by the best relievers.

SæderMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

indeed. the reason mentioned for both of those instances were that these were the scheduled “throw days” between starts.

I’ve never pitched. I was a lowly light-hitting corner outfielder on my high school’s JV team. So I have no idea if one inning of MLB pitching is equivalent to the in-between “throw day” bullpen session. It’s odd, too, since the dodgers relievers have been quite good this year, even the wild and shaky Joe Kelly!

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Exactly why the teams are wasting lots of roster spots on back of the bullpen arms who will never see the ball.

synco
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

It’s just cuckoo bird. The Dodgers have now played 8 playoff games. Somehow Scherzer, who is a starter, has pitched in four of them. And pitched extremely well! Yet two of those four appearances are starts that were “failures” because he came out after 4.1 in each. It shouldn’t be this hard.

JimmieFoxxalorianMember since 2020
4 years ago

Will it always be this way? Say it ain’t so. I miss the postseason Bob Gibsons and John Smoltzes of the world

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

Poor Jack Morris feels excluded

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

You young guys! I go back to Johnny Antonelli, Johnny Podres, Lew Burdette, Jim Lonborg and many more going all the way. That was what hooked me for life on this beautiful game, which Devers just exhibited with his glove.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

I find it hard to believe that a reliever is as effective pitching for the 4th or 5th time in 10 days against the same team. I also find it hard to believe that the 5th or 6th reliever on the totem pole is as effective as a Top 3 starter on a playoff team. And I can’t believe that using star starters in relief between starts is optimal in getting the best out of them. I’d believe it with evidence but it just makes no sense.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Agree 100%. Overworked bullpens are just that. Jacob deGrom’s 120th pitch is going to be better than any middle relievers first pitch. Regarding starters being used in relief, there is a different routine for each and a starter is not accustomed to a very different pre-performance routine.

couthcommander
4 years ago

The sports betting sites have not noticed this trend yet (or maybe don’t care if the bettors haven’t). I think the line was at like 5 innings for Anderson and 6 for Scherzer last night. Pretty easy to take the under this postseason. (not that I recommend betting, especially if you can’t afford to lose)

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  couthcommander

Man that’s stealing money for Anderson . That’s college basketball level ignorance from the book.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

It’s possible the increased workload affects starters more than relievers but reliever workload has jumped 2020-2021 also. More innings for starters but maybe more max effort innings for relievers – I don’t know

mariodegenzgz
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Teams don’t care about burning relief arms, because they’re cheap and easy to find. Now, with bona fide starters? They’re gonna be more cautious.

hurricanexyzMember since 2016
4 years ago

What I’m curious about is how this affects the performances of the *relievers.* I think I remember hearing that the general performance edge that relievers have had since time immemorial had shrunk or even vanished the last season or two? Be interesting to see how that’s gone in the postseason with such extreme usage patterns.

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago

I’m confused by the column Starter IP% in the table labeled Starting Pitcher Regular Season Performance 2015-21. I assume that it’s showing starter innings as a percentage of total innings. In which case, how did starters pitch more innings per start this year than last year but pitch a smaller % of innings?

Also, why are the numbers in that column different than the numbers in the column Reg Starter IP% in the table Regular vs. Postseason Starter Innings Share 2015-21? Shouldn’t they be the same?

I’m either completely misunderstanding something (always an option) or there’s an error somewhere.

Matthew CerratoMember since 2021
4 years ago

In terms of the 2020 percentages, remember there were more 7 inning games, with a ton of doubleheaders. We still had a few this season, but not enough to skew the percentages.

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago

True but that doesn’t explain the numbers in the first table or why the numbers are different between the two tables. Just look at the 2021 row in the first table I mentioned. It shows starters averaging 5.02 Innings but only accounting for 46.2% of innings. I don’t see how those two sets of numbers can go together unless Starter IP% means something very different than how I’m interpreting it (starter innings as a percent of all innings).

Dave TMember since 2025
4 years ago

Good point.

I just took a look at the Fangraphs leaderboards, and the figures that I see are starters pitching 24,402 total innings in 2021, out of 42,165 total innings pitched. That calculates to starters pitching 57.3% of total innings.

(BTW, the leaderboard numbers tie to 5.02 average IP/G by starting pitchers in 2021.)

So it looks to me like the first chart has a typo for % of innings pitched by starting pitchers during the 2021 regular season.

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

Thanks, glad to know that I’m not crazy! (or at least not for this). The 57.3% for 2021 is what I get as well and it is what’s reflected in the second chart that I mentioned in my original comment. From what I can tell, all the numbers in the first chart are wrong for all years, not just 2021.

whiptydojoe
4 years ago

I can’t help but wonder that the Wild Card play-in game is a big contributor to this. Not only does it make 4 teams (2 from the AL and NL) push all their chips in, this is also after, typically, final weekends of doing nearly the same thing.

It seems an answer would be to either expand the playoffs more and take away the play-in game or get rid of the play-in game and get ALL playoff teams on set series schedules.

I fully realize two of the “bigger” organizations (Dodgers & Rays and their exorbitant RP usage) is also a big factor in not only this postseason, but last postseason as well.

synco
4 years ago
Reply to  whiptydojoe

The WC game is a huge factor, since it’s a Game 7 at the very beginning of the postseason. The Dodgers used 6 pitchers in their WC game, all the same guys who have thrown in seemingly every game since with the exception of Urias. It’s only one game, but it starts everybody’s rest clock right off the bat. You go into Game 1 of your first “real” series with your stud pitchers already fatigued.

Matthew CerratoMember since 2021
4 years ago

This goes hand in hand with the style of offense being played today. More players on more teams working deeper counts/looking for cripple pitches as opposed to shorter at-bats. Even your “aggressive” teams these days are extremely patient when compared to 20-30 years ago. This puts pressure on the pitchers to always be precise, limit any and all contact, and drives up pitches per inning, to the point where any starter is hitting 100 pitches somewhere in the 6th if they even last that long.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago

Well they have to save the starters arms for relief work in later games!

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Comment of the day! LOL

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

It is interesting, but I wonder if it is at all based on their work in-between games. Is Max going all out in bullpens? If he is, then maybe this isn’t difficult to do at all? With that said pulling him after 4.1ip seemed a bit extreme.

JohnThackerMember since 2025
4 years ago

“Three of the four remaining teams have combined to get one start of six innings or longer in a victory thus far. ”

It strikes me as a little odd to write this sentence and not get around to mentioning the other team and its results (it’s the Braves, winning two Max Fried starts of six innings, right?)

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago

Sort of curious if teams are taking a leaf from ( very recent) college baseball with the very short leashes and pitching the same relievers pretty much every day.

theoriolewayMember since 2026
4 years ago

It seems to me that deadening the baseball (which makes home runs less likely) and limiting both rosters and roster turnover (which limits the number of fungible arms in the bullpen) would significantly help things. This is just another symptom of the root cause: the rise of swing and miss pitching.

eely225Member since 2019
4 years ago

Ian Happ said he read this article.

I thought that was neat.