Bryan Price on Developing (But Not Babying) Pitchers
Bryan Price doesn’t believe in limiting pitchers. That much is clear based on his response to a question I posed during last week’s Winter Meetings. I asked the Cincinnati Reds manager — and former minor- and major-league pitching coach — if there are any changes he’d like to see in the way the organization develops pitchers.
I expected a more cautious answer than I received. Rather than pussyfoot, Price proffered a strong opinion. The way he sees it, babying pitchers in the minor leagues compromises their ability to work deep into games once they reach Cincinnati. Not only that, it can hinder their chances of becoming a top-notch starter.
Note: Price’s comments, which were delivered in a group setting, have been edited for clarity and continuity.
———
Bryan Price on developing pitchers: “The big challenge for me, personally, is a world where we want pitchers to throw less. I think they need to throw more. And not just necessarily bulk innings; I think pitchers need to throw more on the side. We have pitchers come through our system who throw bullpen sides of 25 to 30 pitches when we get them. I would like to see them have a bigger workload on their side days. I would like to see some of them throw twice between starts. I would like to see us build our starting pitchers to where they can carry a heavier workload in the minor leagues.
“We had Anthony DeSclafani complete a game in Arizona, in August. It was his first complete game in professional baseball. That, to me, is unheard of. And it’s not his fault. It’s the fault of this whole group of people that feel like we have to put these kids in a bubble.
“The injury rates aren’t going down with the amount of pitches, and innings, being lessened. That’s not happening. We’re still having our best pitchers have surgeries and miss time. It has not been proven that workload is a direct factor. I’d like to see our guys take on more of a workload.
“We have always used our common sense in this game. If you’ve got a minor-league pitcher who goes out and throws a 120-pitch complete game, you’re not going to let him throw another 120-pitch complete game the next time out. You might cut him back to five or six innings and 80 or 85 pitches. But we pay these guys a lot of money to play baseball — as a starting pitcher you’re going to make $8 million or $10 million or $12 million or $20 million — so you better be out there a lot.
“That was the beauty of Johnny Cueto — he pitched until the game was over if he was throwing the ball well. I would like to see more of that in the game because eventually the relievers are going to be the guys that are eating up all the innings. Those career spans are going to shorten. You can’t ask relievers to throw 125-150 innings, which is the way the game is headed if we start using these multiple-inning closers and setup guys with too much frequency.
“I understand the numbers going up [each time a pitcher goes through the order]. I understand that. But in my opinion, until you allow your young guys to pitch in innings seven, eight and nine, they will never be able to do that. You have to allow them to go through that order.
“Clayton Kershaw isn’t Clayton Kershaw because the Dodgers said, ‘You know what, the third time through the lineup we have to get him out of there.’ He doesn’t become Clayton Kershaw unless he’s allowed to become Clayton Kershaw.
“There are going to be guys that are 90-pitch, five- or six-inning starters. No question about that. The game defines that, an organization defines that. But we’re putting too many limitations on the young pitcher to ever define if he’s capable of being Clayton Kershaw, or the next version of him. Or any other pitcher, like an Adam Wainwright —guys that have logged innings. We’re turning them all into six-inning pitchers and I don’t agree with it. Doesn’t mean I’m right, but I can tell you, I don’t agree with it.”
David Laurila grew up in Michigan's Upper Peninsula and now writes about baseball from his home in Cambridge, Mass. He authored the Prospectus Q&A series at Baseball Prospectus from December 2006-May 2011 before being claimed off waivers by FanGraphs. He can be followed on Twitter @DavidLaurilaQA.
Price’s is not going to be a popular opinion. The data that major league pitch and inning limits aren’t working does not preclude overuse as a cause of injury. The damage is likely done far before they step on a MLB mound.
That’s possible, but I’m not sure we have any data on that yet. I’m inclined to believe that much of it is the death of the multi sport high school athlete. When they mostly just play baseball year round, they aren’t developing other muscles/ligaments. I haven’t seen data on this yet, either, but I’m hoping someone is studying it.
I also think the overemphasis on one sport is the cause of higher velocity, so it isn’t necessarily all bad.
“Clayton Kershaw isn’t Clayton Kershaw because the Dodgers said, ‘You know what, the third time through the lineup we have to get him out of there.’ He doesn’t become Clayton Kershaw unless he’s allowed to become Clayton Kershaw.
This is such an absurd statement. The idea that Kershaw is great because the Dodgers allowed him to pitch the 7th, 8th, and 9th innings is patently ridiculous. He pitches those innings because he’s fantastic; it’s not the other way around.
In 2008, Kershaw only through 108 innings for the Dodgers and he only threw 171 (in 30 starts) in 2009. In ’08, he only pitched into the 7th 3 times and in ’09, he only pitched into the 7th 10 times out of those 30 starts. Now that he’s the best pitcher on the planet, he pitches the 7th, 8th, and 9th regularly.
Despite what he says, I also don’t think he truly understands the times-through-the-order penalty. It’s not that Cueto or Kershaw have somehow learned to avoid the penalty. It’s that they’re so damned good that at 80% they’re still better than the alternative.
His premise that more throwing = increased durability is also flawed logic. Last I checked, the evidence actually suggests the opposite. The theory goes, weight lifting and stretching builds up arm strength and durability, while pitching drains it.
Yes, using Cueto and kershaw to define the “average” pitcher in either quality or salary isn’t a very good starting point
A lot of money has gone into determining why pitchers get hurt and we don’t have any answers. I think it is too much throwing in their developing years and not enough in their mature years, so I partly agree with him.
Fergie Jenkins threw every day and never lifted weights. He was as durable as any pitcher in the game. Many of his rivals such as Tom Seaver have said the same thing.
“we pay these guys a lot of money to play baseball — as a starting pitcher you’re going to make $8 million or $10 million or $12 million or $20 million — so you better be out there a lot”
Most players are not being paid anywhere near that amount of money and using that to justify increasing the workload is a poor argument. Players are paid money for results, not innings they pitched.
Not only that, but the Reds’ staff in particular is filled with pre-arb pitchers (outside of that abysmal Homer Bailey contract)
Innings are themselves results. This isn’t basketball.
Also, he’s advocating for increased workloads in the MINOR LEAGUES!
“Players are paid money for results, not innings they pitched.”
While I understand the premise of the remark, I don’t think I agree with that statement.
Results are great, yes- But there is a definite value that is placed on being able to be counted on to deliver bulk innings.
An average to below average starting pitcher will get signed as a FA because a team can count on him to cover innings. They’re less concerned with quality (up to a point) than they are with quantity.
A lot to address here:
– “The injury rates aren’t going down with the amount of pitches, and innings, being lessened.”
Is this true? I have no idea, and wonder if Price does.
– Because he seems to base a lot of his argument on the fact that Clayton Kershaw got hurt. “We’re still having our best pitchers have surgeries and miss time.”
– “That was the beauty of Johnny Cueto — he pitched until the game was over if he was throwing the ball well.”
There are a lot of beautiful things about Johnny Cueto, including his Instagram feed. But durability wasn’t really one of them. Cueto had 11 complete games in 8 seasons as a Red. He also missed big parts of two seasons with injury, and only twice started more than 31 games.
– “I would like to see more of that in the game because eventually the relievers are going to be the guys that are eating up all the innings. Those career spans are going to shorten. You can’t ask relievers to throw 125-150 innings, which is the way the game is headed if we start using these multiple-inning closers and setup guys with too much frequency.”
He’s already complaining about the long-term negative effects of something that hasn’t even happened (the Miller-ification of bullpens). Blake Wood threw 76.2 IP as a reliever this year. That’s the most any Red has thrown during the Price era. Other than Mike Marshall, no reliever has ever thrown 150 innings. Price’s Reds regularly carry seven, and sometimes eight relievers. He’s in no risk of burning out relievers.
– “I understand the numbers going up [each time a pitcher goes through the order]. I understand that. But in my opinion, until you allow your young guys to pitch in innings seven, eight and nine, they will never be able to do that. You have to allow them to go through that order.”
He’s saying he wants guys to do something that’s sub-optimal, because otherwise they’ll never be able to do the sub-optimal thing. I guess “The closer is the closer because he’s the closer.”
– “Clayton Kershaw isn’t Clayton Kershaw because the Dodgers said, ‘You know what, the third time through the lineup we have to get him out of there.’ He doesn’t become Clayton Kershaw unless he’s allowed to become Clayton Kershaw.”
IMO, drawing any development or health conclusions based on the greatest pitcher of a generation is incredibly silly.
– “There are going to be guys that are 90-pitch, five- or six-inning starters. No question about that. The game defines that, an organization defines that”
I actually agree with this 100%.
– “But we’re putting too many limitations on the young pitcher to ever define if he’s capable of being Clayton Kershaw, or the next version of him.”
Back to Kershaw again.
The bigger question is who Price is arguing about? Because the Reds haven’t drafted/signed and developed a starting pitcher since Mike Leake. Maybe he’s referring to guys like Chapman, Cingrani, and Lorenzen — all of whom were signed as relief pitchers and failed the conversation to starting. But there really hasn’t been a single guy who’s come up through the Reds system who has had trouble pitching deep into games. At this point, the bulk of their innings are being thrown by acquisitions, like DiSclafani, Straily, Finnegan, and assorted AAA journeymen.
So, let me get this straight… if starters throw way more pitches on more days, it will be good for them. But if relievers do it, it’s going to shorten their careers. That seems… logically inconsistent, at best.
So, with the whole “two side sessions between starts” thing, how’s that going to work? You aren’t throwing the day after your start. That means you’ve got one of these two schedules:
Start, rest, side, rest, side, start.
or
Start, rest, side, side, rest, start.
In both scenarios, you’ve got a guy pitching two days in a row. One in which he’s starting the day after throwing a side session, and in the other, he’s throwing side sessions on back-to-back days between starts.
Are either of those things going to work? Are they really going to not only keep guys healthier, but also get them to pitch more efficiently and deeper into games? There’s no real data on this, because well, I don’t think anyone has ever really done it with professional pitchers. But, it just doesn’t *seem* like it’s a good plan.
Catch Bryan Price after tonight’s game in a special segment of “Cryin’ with Brian.”
I agree with this portion of his statement, “The big challenge for me, personally, is a world”
I bet this was twice as long before you took all the curse words out
If I was a pitcher for the Reds I’d be very very scared right now. Just from those comments it seems he has the potential to be Dusty Baker 2.0.