Canó’s PED Suspension Has a Silver Lining for Mets

Not too long ago, Robinson Canó appeared to have a real shot at becoming the first second baseman to reach the twin milestones of 3,000 hits and 400 home runs, as well as an eventual berth in the Hall of Fame. In May 2018, however, while playing for the Mariners, he drew an 80-game suspension after testing positive for a banned diuretic. Now, as a member of the Mets following a blockbuster trade that has thus far looked like a flop, he’s drawn another suspension for violating the game’s joint drug agreement. As his second offense, this one will cost him the entire 2021 season as well as all of his $24 million salary. That’s a situation that could benefit the Mets, who under new owner Steve Cohen are already primed to be one of the winter’s more aggressive teams.

It’s the latest bum note for Canó in his second tour of New York. Acquired from the Mariners on December 3, 2018 along with Edwin Díaz and cash in exchange for a five-player package headlined by first-round picks Jarred Kelenic and Justin Dunn, the former Yankees star was limited to 107 games due to hamstring and quad injuries in 2019. Both his 93 wRC+ and 0.8 WAR represented his worst numbers since 2008, and the deal looked even worse due to Díaz’s collapse; the pair’s underperformance probably cost the Mets a Wild Card berth, as they finished with 86 wins, three fewer than the lower Wild Card seed, the Brewers. Adding insult to injury, Eric Longenhagen placed Kelenic 11th on his Top 100 Prospects list in the spring, the same ranking that both Baseball America, and MLB.com gave him.

Canó did fare better in 2020. Though he served a 10-day stint on the Injured List due to a groin strain in early August, he hit .316/.352/.544 while tying for second on the team with 10 homers, and placing fourth via both his 141 wRC+ and 1.3 WAR. It wasn’t nearly enough to help the Mets, who sputtered to a 26-34 record and a fourth-place finish in the NL East.

Via ESPN’s Jeff Passan, the 38-year-old Canó tested positive for stanozolol, an old-school anabolic steroid sold as Winstrol, ingested as a tablet, and relatively easy to detect because of its long half-life, meaning that it stays in the body for longer. Best known as the drug for which Olympic sprinter Ben Johnson was popped in 1988, and for which slugger Rafael Palmeiro was suspended in 2005, it’s seen as unsophisticated and outdated in drug circles, though it’s now been implicated in seven of MLB’s last 27 PED suspensions, dating back to the start of the 2015 season.

That rate is surprisingly similar to the one reported by the New York Times‘ Juliet Macur in April 2015. In the wake of a two-week period in which pitchers David Rollins, Jenrry Mejia, and Ervin Santana all drew suspensions for stanozolol in a two-week period in March and April, Macur reported that stanozolol positives accounted for one-fourth of MLB’s drug violations over the previous six years, about 80% of which were pitchers, and about 70% of which were from the Dominican Republic. Since then, the substance has been implicated in the suspensions of Mejia (his second one), Jorge Polanco, Tim Beckham, and now Canó.

Canó was first suspended on May 15, 2018 for violating the Joint Drug Program by testing positive for furosemide, a diuretic better known as Lasix. Used to treat high blood pressure, fluid retention and swelling caused by congestive heart failure, liver disease, kidney disease, and other medical conditions, it’s banned by MLB because it’s frequently used as a masking agent. By increasing the rate of urine flow and sodium excretion, diuretics such as furosemide can reduce the concentration of banned substances within the urine. At the time, ESPN’s T.J. Quinn — long one of the leading reporters covering the PED beat — reported that “players are NOT automatically suspended for using diuretics. The suspension means MLB was able to prove he was using it to mask a drug. Canó tested positive before the season, appealed and dropped the appeal.”

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

All of which made the claims of Mets general manager Brodie Van Wagenen and chief operating officer Jeff Wilpon look rather silly when the former — who had previously represented Canó as an agent, negotiating his 10-year, $240 million deal with the Mariners in December 2013 — traded for him. “I don’t want to get into semantics, but I do think it’s important remembering Robby was not suspended for a PED,” said Van Wagenen at the time. “I don’t think he’s a drug cheat,” said Wilpon. “I could be proven wrong, but I don’t think he’s a drug cheat.”

Alas, here we are… well, not Wilpon or Van Wagenen. On November 6, less than an hour after the Wilpon era ended with the completion of Cohen’s $2.4 billion purchase of the team, the Mets announced Van Wagenen’s departure as well as those of several of his lieutenants. Sandy Alderson, whom Van Wagenen replaced as GM in 2018, is back as team president, overseeing a search for a head of baseball operations. In response to Canó’s suspension, Alderson offered a boilerplate statement (“extremely disappointed… very unfortunate… fully support MLB’s efforts toward eliminating performance enhancing substances…”).

Canó, at this writing, has yet to comment, but really, what’s left for him to say now that he’s in this position a second time? In 2018, while maintaining that the diuretic was given to him by a licensed doctor for a medical ailment, he said via a statement, “While I did not realize at the time that I was given a medication that was banned, I obviously now wish that I had been more careful.” Given that he’s seen that the league means business when it comes to its strict liability policy — that is, that players are accountable for what goes into their bodies, regardless of intent — any claim that he again accidentally ingested a banned substance is going to ring hollow.

Here it’s worth noting that Canó is just the second major leaguer to be suspended for PEDs in 2020; the first one, the full-season suspension of Astros pitcher Francis Martes, was issued in February. The dearth of suspensions, as you might guess, is related to the coronavirus pandemic. Earlier this month, the New York Post’s Joel Sherman reported that the league did not test during the period between the close of spring training in mid-March and the reopening of camps in July, in part because the Montreal laboratory that handles the samples was closed due to the pandemic and because in some jurisdictions, sample collectors were not deemed essential personnel under COVID-19 protocols. Additionally, a Salt Lake City lab that MLB uses for PED testing was converted into the league’s central facility for handling COVID-19 tests.

The information about limited PED testing wasn’t made public, likely because it would have encouraged players to exploit the situation. Via Sherman, roughly 1,000 tests were performed, but 1,289 players appeared in a major league game, so many players were tested only once during the season, and some not at all. As part of the Joint Drug Program, the league and the union are supposed to issue a report of the total numbers of tests and of positive results by December 1, which suggests that more suspensions could be in store this month.

Thus, it appears quite possible that Canó realized that under pandemic conditions, MLB wasn’t testing with its usual regularity, and he was willing to gamble his salary and whatever remained of his reputation and legacy on not getting caught. It’s a sad and depressing fall given that he already has Hall of Fame numbers and accomplishments. His total of 2,624 hits ranks ninth among players who spent the majority of their careers at second base, while his 334 home runs ranks second to Jeff Kent’s 377 (going by the strict split, counting only home runs as a second baseman, he trails 351-316). He’s seventh in JAWS among second baseman; among active players, only Albert Pujols (second among first basemen) and Mike Trout (fifth among center fielders) rank higher at their respective positions.

Given the history of the way that BBWAA voters have handled PED-linked candidates, it’s not hard to see how rough the sledding will be for Canó. Both Palmeiro and Manny Ramirez, thus far the most prominent of the suspended players to reach the ballot, have been roundly rejected by voters despite Hall-caliber numbers and achievements. Palmeiro, just the fourth player to reach both 3,000 hits and 500 homers, fell off the ballot after four tries, never receiving more than 12.6%. Ramirez, who ranks 15th on the all-time list in homers (555), eighth in slugging percentage (.585), and 10th among left fielders in JAWS (54.6, one point above the standard), hasn’t gotten more than 28.2% in four years on the ballot. While both Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens — neither of whom was ever suspended for PEDs, but both of whom were implicated by other means as having used during the period before testing — climbed above 60% on the 2020 ballot, other candidates similarly connected to the drugs during the pre-testing era, such as Mark McGwire, Gary Sheffield, and Sammy Sosa, have lagged.

Next year, Alex Rodriguez, who was suspended for the entire 2014 season due to his connections to the PED-dealing Biogenesis lab, and David Ortiz, who reportedly failed the 2004 survey test, will become eligible for the first time. It seems entirely possible and perhaps even likely that the former will receive the lesser support of the two despite superior statistics, for his suspension was shocking and at the time unprecedented within the sport. Between the full-year suspensions of Rodriguez and Canó, just three other players have drawn such discipline: the Mets’ Mejia (who during that suspension tested positive a third time, incurring a permanent ban), Indians outfielder Marlon Byrd, and Martes.

For the Mets, this might actually work out in their favor, as they now have an additional $20.25 million in expected payroll to play with — that’s Canó’s $24 million annual salary, minus the $3.75 million annual payment from the Mariners that was part of the trade — and Cohen doesn’t appear inclined to stash that money under his mattress the way the Wilpons did when it came to the insurance payments for David Wright’s inactivity. Per our Depth Charts, Canó was projected to produce 2.1 WAR in 2021, which is nontrivial to replace, but the Mets now have additional routes via which they can do that while also shopping for a center fielder, starting catcher, and rotation help.

For example, they could pursue free agent second baseman DJ LeMahieu while using Jeff McNeil as an everyday utilityman at second and third base, and in the outfield corners; return McNeil to his natural position at second and find a competent defender to pair with J.D. Davis at third; or pair Amed Rosario and Andrés Giménez in the middle infield and put the savings towards free agents. While trading for Francisco Lindor remains an option, and a risky one at that unless they’re prepared to back up a Brinks truck to keep him, they can now more easily afford Nolan Arenado, who might want out of Colorado badly enough to waive his post-2021 opt-out clause.

Of course, what the Mets intend do about the $40.5 million they still owe Canó is another matter, but under Cohen, that promises to be much less of a problem than it was during the Wilpon era. In turning the bad news of a suspended star player into potential good news when it comes to spending and roster flexibility, this really might be a new era for the Mets.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

53 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
5 years ago

As a Braves fan, when I first heard the news my immediate reaction was “crap, that might be the best thing to happen to the Mets”

Their roster is pieces together by a lot of positionless bat-first guys, and Cano was one of the many awkward fits. He makes their infield situation slightly less murky all though it’s still a mess. But if the Mets are available to avoid his ‘21 payout, under Cohen’s ownership, they should be able to make several splashes this offseason. Getting 2006 Mets vibes this offseason

tomerafan
5 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

I sent and received a number of text messages yesterday celebrating this news. Which feels odd to do, morally, but it’s the best thing that could have happened to the Mets on so many levels. There’s the obvious (let McNeil play his natural position; spend the $20M; etc.). There’s the next-tier (range was declining and looked to drop further; lefty bat in a lefty-heavy lineup, although he doesn’t hit lefties poorly). But most of all, there’s the fact that Cano is a vestige of a disappointing era, and that fans will always tie him to BVW and to losing Kelenic. If Diaz pitches well, I think Mets fans will embrace him… but Robbie felt like an active-roster albatross even while posting a nearly .900 OPS (that was now, obviously, chemically-enhanced).

sogoodlooking
5 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Those ‘positionless bat-first guys’ being just Dom Smith and JD Davis. They should keep both, as in addition to having a lineup with several better defenders there that can limit the damage Davis’s defense does at 3B, with Davis and Dom the Mets have a DH platoon and / or power off the bench, a rarity for them, and even a respectable LF platoon in case they lose an OFer to serious injury.

—Adding Springer in CF now lets the Mets move Nimmo to LF, frees McNeil for, probably, 2B, and assuming Giminez at SS gives the Mets an above average defense for the first time in years. They should also live with JD Davis at 3B, given Springer’s salary and the desperate need for more starting pitching. That will include a #2 SP if they want to do more than just make the postseason, but actually want a shot at the World Series, and another SP on par with Stroman if the want a *real* shot at the World Series. $80m AAV worth of offseason spending only lets you add a bullpen arm and defense-first catching after that, since even with Cano’s salary freed up they’d be up against the luxury tax. They’ll be a WS threat, in the tier below the Dodgers.

Cave Dameron
5 years ago

Should be banned for life.

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

FOR. LIFE.

shumway
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

I don’t disagree, but if any sport/institution is going to have a 3 strikes and you’re out rule, well…

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Hi Cave, how do you add a profile pic? I can’t figure it out. This is an open question btw

Franco

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

If you mail a hardcopy photo to David Appelman he will gladly add it for you.

Or you can go to your name in the top right corner, go to Profile, and add it in there.

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

I have been mailing him 8×10 glamour shots (some of myself, some of favorite MLBers, some of random strangers in and around my city) and still, NOTHING.

(Unless you call a “restraining order” a response?)

Just this week I sent him Omar Daal, Peter Bergeron, and a lady down at the Stop-N-Save who looked a little bit like Secretariat.

loria_estefan
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Thank you Cave, very cool!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

I could never really wrap my brain around the idea that somehow they had two second basemen who either didn’t have the ability to play third or the team wasn’t confident in them there.

Cano getting suspended isn’t really solving that problem in the conventional sense, and they still have three first basemen, but it helps because having another $20M to use to pursue Springer (or Realmuto + Bradley) would improve their team defense considerably, letting them run a Nimmo-Springer-Conforto lineup out there and having McNeil largely handle 2B. Of course, they would still have three first basemen, one of whom they keep running out a third (Davis) but it would be big progress.

Connor Grey
5 years ago

I haven’t seen or heard anything official but I think Seattle still has to pay the Mets $3.75 million on December 1st. The Mets pay Canó $24 million annually and the Mariners pay New York $3.75 million each December 1st from 2019-2022. Again, I might just be interpreting Cot’s Contracts incorrectly but the money from the Mariners seems to just be part of the return the Mets got in that trade. It doesn’t seem to be stipulated that the Mets only get the payments if they’re paying Canó’s salary.

Joel PerkinsMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay Jaffe

From Ryan Divish (M’s beat): As part of this trade, the Mariners included $20 million in salary relief to the Mets, which included $3.75 million for the 2021 season.

Per sources, the M’s expect to still have to pay it based on the basic framework of the trade. But they’ll ask for a ruling from MLB on it

LenFuegoMember since 2025
5 years ago

Shouldn’t the Mets be able to void the rest of Cano’s contract for breach, and save another $40M+? I mean, it seems like being a cheat would have to violate the good faith clause that is read into every contract by the courts. And if not, it just goes to show that MLB is still not as serious as it should be about cleaning up the game — the financial incentives for taking PEDs are clear, so the financial disincentives for the same need to be sufficient to overcome those incentives. Any labor negotiations have to start with “the contract of any player suspended for a PED violation must be voidable by their club.”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  LenFuego

Third positive is lifetime ban from MLB. You are not going to be able to skip Step 2 when it’s spelled out so clearly in the CBA.

Interestingly, the only player to get a third positive test was also a Met (Jenrry Mejia).

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He’s not talking about a lifetime ban after the 2nd offense. He’s saying that the team should be able to void the contract, that’s not the same thing as banning a player.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Yeah that’s also not happening. The penalties are spelled out in the CBA. It’s pretty clear what the expectation is. As far as I can tell, the only successes teams have had voiding contracts is when they injure themselves playing soccer or something like that.

If they want out of that contract they should be hoping he keeps using and gets banned a third time. That’s their only way out unless he quits or dies and he’s not quitting and probably not dying (or at least, that would be a cruel thing to hope for).

LHPSU
5 years ago
Reply to  LenFuego

Teams already benefited from the player’s PED-boosted performance and don’t have to pay the player during a suspension. Tilting the scales any further might make teams provide, er, less than comprehensive PED-avoidance support to aging players on dead-weight contracts.

PhilMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  LenFuego

If you trade for a player who has already been banned for PED use (yes, even though it was a masking agent), you should be aware of the risks.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago

One thing I have noticed about Cano, is he seems to run hot and cold on a yearly basis. His statcast numbers in 2019 were actually pretty decent, so it could just be noise, but it is interesting to see what he has done for his entire career. He has alternated 140ish wRC+, with a 110ish (or lower) wRC+ for the last 7 years. I remember noticing that before last year, then wondering if it might have something to do with steroid cycling.

With all that said, the silver-lining is the Mets have a lot of bad first bad defense guys who could/should be DH’s. But we cannot just pretend like there is someone besides DJM out there who is a better bet than a guy with nearly 60 career WAR, and a career 125 wRC+ who hasn’t slowed, at all. As we can see now, he has been cheating. But his defense is the same as it always was, and his bat was the same as it always was. And while I recognize how amazing DJM has been, a lot of it I think is a product of him making solid contact the opposite way, as his absurd home away splits show. His home stats last year .448/505/813 for a 256 wRC+, .283/339/374 on the road for a 98 wRC+. The year prior his numbers were also substantially different (157 home 116 road) with iso dipping to .142 on the road.

I guess it frees up some money, but the Mets were going to spend no matter what this offseason. And despite everyone saying the same thing, I do not see how losing a guy who on numbers alone would be a hall of famer makes your team better, regardless of what position he plays.

LHPSU
5 years ago
Reply to  carter

The Angels will certainly be better without Albert Pujols, who is likely a lock for first-ballot HOF.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Except Pujols didn’t just put up a 141 wRC+ with his 5th consecutive year of positive defensive value as well.

mookie28Member since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  carter

Pujols has been a sunk cost for years, Cano is not. Not the right comp.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  mookie28

I get people don’t like Cano for obv reasons but since he signed his contract he has put up 26 war and will get 216 million. He will forgo his salary this yea, and then be under contract for two more years. He has earned his contract by war at least, even with 3 years left. Cano is a cheater, but you can’t even make the argument that he has no value.

David Klein
5 years ago
Reply to  carter

Yep- the Mariners got good production from him then dumped his back end of the deal on a dumb gm and got a top prospect well played

stakhanovitamix
5 years ago
Reply to  carter

I think it’s a misconception that the Mets have a lot of guys who are only suited to be DH- I think that’s probably the case for JD Davis and maybe Pete Alonso, but they’re the only ones. Conforto is actually fine defensively in RF- not a GG, but not a real liability. Dom Smith is fine as a 1B- the probably is they kept playing him in LF to get his bat in the lineup. Nimmo is fine as a corner OF- but they have played him in CF for lack of a better option. McNeil is OK at 2B or corner OF- he struggled the most in a small sample at 3B, but would probably ultimately be OK if installed there longer term. It has definitely been a problem that they did not play guys in the ideal position- but most of the guys, other than Davis, are perfectly capable of playing defense somewhere.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

The problem is just that they have three first basemen, no center fielder, no catcher, and no third baseman. (and until recently, two second basemen). It’s too bad that nobody seems to want to give up anything good for first basemen anymore because if they could turn one of those into basically anything else they’d be much better off for it.

I guess if Bobby Dalbec was better, then a Dom Smith for Dalbec trade would make a lot of sense. But there are some serious questions about Dalbec’s hit tool.

ScottyBMember since 2017
5 years ago

This works especially well if the NL adopts the DH:
1B- Smith
2B- McNeil
SS- Giminez/Rosario
3B- Davis/Gimemez
DH- Alonso
OF- Nimmo, Springer (I can hope!), Conforto
And put the Cano savings into pitching.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
5 years ago
Reply to  ScottyB

Ahh, yes this is essentially what I just commented. Agree on this 100%. I would think Springer should be more than just a hope. If the DH is permanent, I think he should be their top priority, perhaps even if it is not permanent.

SyndergaardengnomesMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  ScottyB

Rolling without a catcher… Bold strategy, let’s see if it pays off…

It is ridiculous that the entire NL is at a disadvantage of not knowing for certain if the DH will be available to them next year. How is that a level playing field when competing for free agents, or contemplating trades? Do we just assume that the DH will exist, and then get screwed if it isn’t?

ScottyBMember since 2017
5 years ago

Hah! I did forget catcher… it seems the Mets have as well!

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago

It’s not like it will just go forever – there’s an umpire AND a backstop back there.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
5 years ago

Knowing whether the DH is here to stay for 2021 is perhaps more important to the Mets at this point. They are still likely to be playing a few players out of position as it stands now. And while a certain portion of the Mets fanbase and NY media are screaming for them to sign DJ LeMahieu because of this, the financial commitment to Cano doesn’t go away, and he won’t just disappear off their roster in 2022, unless he is straight-up released. It would make more sense to reinvest this $20 million break on loading up in the bullpen on some one-year-deals, and/or a bigger one-year-deal to Bauer/Morton, at least to me.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago

(or in 2023, heh)

ScottyBMember since 2017
5 years ago

Sign Hand, Colome and Soria to 1-year deals with the Cano savings and a little bit more.

MikeD
5 years ago

The Mets can certainly release Cano, and the Cohen-led Mets have the ability to pay Cano’s remaining salary if they opt to straight out release him, but the obligation and the payroll implication related to the luxury-tax remains in 2022 and 2023 even if Cano is gone. They’ll still have to account for the $20M+ each year as they manage their payroll obligations and approach or exceed one or several of the luxury tax levels. Cano won’t impact this this coming season, but he will in the two following seasons. If the Universal DH becomes a reality, they may simply see what he can do first. That’s what pretty much any other team would do. See if there’s any value left.

The best Cano scenario before failing the drug test was he’d go out, have a full season similar to his 2020 season, and then the Mets legitimately could have looked at trading him. They’d have to pay down the deal, but it was doable. Now they’ll simply have to eat the entirely of the remainder of the deal if they opt not to bring him back in 2022. The wise decision is to see if he can still hit.

Connor Grey
5 years ago

It seems like Trevor Bauer’s more likely to get a multi-year contract but since the Mets get a one year break from paying Canó’s salary now, I think New York signing Bauer for one year at a high AAV just became a lot more likely.

tomerafan
5 years ago
Reply to  Connor Grey

Tim Britton’s take on The Athletic was that Stroman’s one-year QO is effectively “free” in the team budget because it’s roughly equivalent to the Cano savings and for the same time frame. And I like that take. So we get Stroman for the money we would have paid Robbie, rather than adding Stro’s payroll to the bottom line. This seems like the most sensible way to look at it.

I still think the Mets sign Bauer, Springer, and McCann, and bolster the pitching staff. Charlie Morton would be amazing on a one-year deal if he is interested in leaving Tampa Bay and a rotation of DeGrom / Bauer / Stroman / Morton / Peterson would be unbelievable, never mind Syndergaard’s hopeful return. That can be done without going to luxury tax status, and you can upgrade the bullpen pieces taboot. (I still prefer Bauer & Springer with McCann to Realmuto.)

I thought trading for a 3B was a must. Interestingly, Todd Zeile – who knows a lot about playing 3B – thinks that Davis made a lot of improvement last year, and continues to work on it, and has a chance at being an average defensive 3B this season, which is an interesting take.

Connor Grey
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

I hope they don’t trade any prospects for major leaguers. Sign a bunch of pitchers to short term deals, two of Springer, Realmuto, and McCann, and trade superfluous position players if they wouldn’t fit in a bench role or don’t have any options left.

Cohen says he doesn’t care about losing money at first. If he truly means that, it would be best in the short and long term to hang onto every single prospect they have while going nuts in free agency and taking on other teams’ bad contracts until the farm system starts pumping high level players onto the big league team.

tomerafan
5 years ago
Reply to  Connor Grey

On one hand, I generally agree. I might trade low-grade prospects for bullpen arms, but that may not be necessary based on what comes down the non-tender pike.

But on the other hand, I think there are going to be 8-12 clubs who are ACTIVELY looking to move payroll this offseason. If you can pick up a good player on a decent contract that is better than the long-term FA market suggests but that is still more expensive than the current team is willing to pay, then you look at sending a piece or two away to buy that good contract.

Connor Grey
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

Good point. Any player should be traded if the return is good enough. But the Mets should set a crazy high standard for what kind of package they’d be willing to trade prospects for. I’m talking so high that even teams looking to shed money won’t be willing to meet their asking price.

ScottyBMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

If the rest of their defense is good, I think they can live with Davis at 3B (sub him out with Gimenez in late innings for d)

Connor Grey
5 years ago
Reply to  ScottyB

Davis has to be better than he was last year if he’s their plan A at 3rd base. They’d be costing themselves wins if they run him out there everyday and he doesn’t show any progress. I wouldn’t hate a Davis/Guillorme platoon though, I think that could be very productive.

rounders
5 years ago

Baseball players say drug screeeing is an intelligence test, and this seems to be playing out. Either that or players of palor are an honest bunch.

Handsome Wes
5 years ago
Reply to  rounders

Ummmm not cool dude

Joel PerkinsMember since 2020
5 years ago

I guess they could say, “Now that contract becomes 3/40 instead of 3/60 if we just pocket the cash.” But that’s not fun.

Handsome Wes
5 years ago

Speaking as a Mets fans, this isn’t a ‘at least there is a silver lining’ situation. This is a ‘bright shining skies, weather is warm with a nice breeze, a glad-to-be-alive day with the sounds of birds chirping in the background’ situation.

Cano and his contract were an albatross on the franchise for two seasons and this is the second-best news of the offseason for the Mets (second only to the arrival of Uncle Steve).

MikeD
5 years ago
Reply to  Handsome Wes

Won’t it remain an albatross in 2022 and 2023? It increased payroll flexibility in 2021, but they still have to play for Cano’s salary the following two seasons, and that will restrict the type of deals they can pursue. The albatross contract remains.

ba5000
5 years ago

The pop-up adds are a little much. They make it difficult to read the article

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago

Wait, I thought money for suspended players still had to be paid by the team to the league? Otherwise, there sure would be incentive for some teams to slip someone something at the right time. I know it used to be this way. Has that changed?

SenorGato
5 years ago

Very, very convenient for new hero owner, Stevie Cohen (Cohen-y for short, maybe? the exaltation/hero worship of this criminal in the national media is hilarious) to gain $24 million in cap space almost immediately

SenorGato
5 years ago

How billionaires committing crimes in America tends to go:

https://youtu.be/Lgtqn1AzXfc?t=69