2015 Positional Ball-in-Play Retrospective – 3B
Camps are open, players either are or aren’t in the best shape of their lives, and everyone’s starting to tire of watching bullpens and PFP. Let’s continue to take a position-by-position look back at the ball-in-play (BIP) profiles of 2015 semi-regulars and regulars to see if we can find any clues as to their projected performance moving forward. We’ve already looked at first basemen and designated hitters and second baseman and shortstops; today, let’s complete the infield with a look at third basemen.
First, some ground rules. To come up with an overall player population roughly equal to one player per team per position, the minimum number of batted balls with Statcast readings was set at 164. Players were listed at the position at which they played the most games. There is more than one player per team at some positions and less at others, like catcher and DH. Players are listed in descending OPS+ order. Without further ado, let’s kick it off with the AL third sackers.
| Name | Avg MPH | FB/LD MPH | GB MPH | POP% | FLY% | LD% | GB% | CON | K% | BB% | OPS+ | Pull% | Cent% | Opp% |
| Donaldson | 92.43 | 96.71 | 88.50 | 3.6% | 34.3% | 17.3% | 44.8% | 156 | 18.7% | 10.3% | 155 | 42.9% | 33.5% | 23.7% |
| Valencia | 92.90 | 95.57 | 90.61 | 2.6% | 27.7% | 17.2% | 52.4% | 149 | 21.2% | 7.7% | 134 | 47.8% | 34.0% | 18.3% |
| Machado | 92.44 | 94.03 | 92.43 | 5.4% | 33.1% | 17.8% | 43.7% | 123 | 15.6% | 9.8% | 131 | 38.1% | 36.7% | 25.2% |
| Moustakas | 89.85 | 91.47 | 90.64 | 6.3% | 35.1% | 18.8% | 39.9% | 103 | 12.4% | 7.0% | 120 | 39.2% | 33.4% | 27.4% |
| Seager | 89.25 | 91.82 | 86.86 | 4.0% | 36.8% | 24.0% | 35.2% | 99 | 14.3% | 7.9% | 118 | 44.4% | 31.8% | 23.8% |
| Longoria | 90.26 | 93.98 | 86.31 | 4.4% | 36.0% | 20.6% | 39.0% | 111 | 19.7% | 7.6% | 111 | 41.9% | 32.1% | 26.0% |
| Beltre | 89.88 | 92.95 | 87.34 | 2.9% | 32.8% | 22.7% | 41.6% | 96 | 10.5% | 6.6% | 110 | 38.8% | 38.6% | 22.6% |
| Freese | 89.56 | 94.29 | 86.28 | 1.9% | 26.2% | 17.5% | 54.4% | 113 | 22.8% | 6.6% | 109 | 38.1% | 30.6% | 31.3% |
| Valbuena | 89.89 | 93.98 | 85.34 | 4.2% | 41.3% | 20.3% | 34.2% | 101 | 21.5% | 10.1% | 103 | 44.7% | 29.3% | 26.0% |
| Plouffe | 90.81 | 93.39 | 88.57 | 4.9% | 35.8% | 18.2% | 41.1% | 101 | 19.6% | 7.9% | 99 | 42.7% | 34.6% | 22.7% |
| Castellanos | 88.36 | 90.59 | 85.37 | 0.5% | 39.9% | 23.3% | 36.2% | 118 | 25.5% | 6.6% | 98 | 36.2% | 34.5% | 29.3% |
| Lawrie | 90.06 | 94.39 | 87.11 | 1.9% | 30.8% | 18.5% | 48.8% | 111 | 23.9% | 4.7% | 92 | 38.1% | 36.7% | 25.2% |
| Headley | 87.20 | 90.48 | 84.31 | 3.6% | 26.8% | 26.6% | 43.1% | 96 | 21.0% | 7.9% | 92 | 44.3% | 35.6% | 20.0% |
| Sandoval | 89.20 | 91.95 | 88.85 | 4.3% | 28.0% | 18.8% | 48.9% | 74 | 14.5% | 5.0% | 76 | 29.8% | 39.5% | 30.8% |
| AVERAGE | 90.15 | 93.26 | 87.75 | 3.6% | 33.2% | 20.1% | 43.1% | 111 | 18.7% | 7.6% | 111 | 40.5% | 34.4% | 25.2% |
Most of the column headers are self explanatory, including average BIP speed (overall and by BIP type), BIP type frequency, K and BB rates, and BIP by field sector (pull, central, opposite). Each player’s OPS and Unadjusted Contact Score (CON) is also listed. For those of you who have not read my articles on the topic, Contact Score is derived by removing Ks and BBs from hitters’ batting lines, assigning run values to all other events, and comparing them to a league average of 100.
