R.A. Dickey and the Myth of One Great Year
Like many others, I’ve expressed some bewilderment on Twitter about how the Mets are handling their negotiations with R.A. Dickey. Dickey was one of the game’s best players in 2012, and the Mets were reportedly offering him the same kind of contract Joe Blanton just signed for, and have now improved their offer to make it equal to what Jeremy Guthrie just signed for. There’s a discount involved with signing an extension a year out from free agency, but the discount has to be reasonable, and these offers don’t strike me as overly reasonable. They don’t strike Dickey as overly reasonable either.
However, there’s a common retort from some folks whenever it is suggested that the Mets pay Dickey like a top-shelf starter. “It was just one year.” Here, see for yourself.
@redsoxbuzztap please stay away frm RA Dickey. He’s a one year wonder not worth the asking price!
— Greg Boucher (@gregjboucher) December 4, 2012
Though, I don’t think it is true. Bluejays do not trade J.P for R.A Dickey. One good year! Plus he’s 37.
— Jordon (@jordon_4) December 4, 2012
Not for a 38 yr old w/one good year RT @nydnharper Source says Mets could get speedy Dee Gordon & top pitching prospect Zach Lee for Dickey.
— DodgersBeat (@DodgersBeat) December 4, 2012
I really hope @bluejays don’t overpay for a guy that was good for one year (Dickey)
— Dustin Funk (@theFunkDust) December 10, 2012
Apparently, there’s this idea that pre-2012 R.A. Dickey was a worthless nothing, and after his fluke season, he’s headed right back to being a trick pitch sideshow. That idea is just hilariously wrong.