Chris Davis: A Risk in Free Agency
Chris Davis is a man of prodigious strength. His efforts, or sometimes lack thereof, have been chronicled by FanGraphs multiple times. Since Davis’ first season with the Baltimore Orioles in 2012, he leads all of major league baseball with 159 home runs and only Edwin Encarnacion is even within 20 home runs of him. Just 10 players are within 50 home runs of Davis over the last four years, which means even if Davis had hit zero home runs in 2015 instead of 47, he would rank in the top 10 over the last four years. As power has become increasingly rare over the past decade, Davis made a great comeback after a disappointing 2014 and is set to get paid in free agency this winter. Looking for comparable players, we can attempt to find out how much that great power is worth as Davis heads into his 30s.
To find historical comps for Davis, first I looked for players from 1960 through 2008 who’d produced a similar number of wins in a similar time framce — in this case, between 10 and 20 WAR through their age-29 seasons. As this is not an incredibly high bar, there were more than 300 players in resulting pool. To further narrow sample, I looked for players who fit a similar offensive profile, so within 10 points of Davis’ 121 wRC+ mark and at least a .200 isolated slugging (Davis’ is .251). This narrowed down the list to 42 players. Limiting the list only to players within 25% of Davis’ 3,512 plate appearances left just 31 players. Davis is coming off 47 home runs, a 147 wRC+, and a 5.6 WAR. Eliminating all players with a wRC+ below 125 or under 400 PA in their age-29 seasons left 15 players, many of whom appear very Chris Davis-like.

Name | PA | HR | ISO | wRC+ | Off | Def | WAR |
Lee May | 3716 | 176 | 0.214 | 127 | 107.9 | -58.2 | 19.6 |
Kirk Gibson | 3104 | 126 | 0.205 | 128 | 112.9 | -31.8 | 19.1 |
Trot Nixon | 2739 | 106 | 0.218 | 122 | 77.9 | -1.4 | 16.8 |
Carl Everett | 2726 | 103 | 0.202 | 117 | 63.0 | 19.2 | 16.4 |
Tino Martinez | 3495 | 157 | 0.211 | 115 | 67.4 | -19.1 | 16.4 |
Cliff Floyd | 3556 | 132 | 0.209 | 121 | 107.4 | -54.8 | 16.3 |
Ryan Klesko | 3369 | 165 | 0.242 | 128 | 120.8 | -61.3 | 16.0 |
Jason Bay | 3259 | 149 | 0.234 | 130 | 141.4 | -88.2 | 15.9 |
Frank Howard | 3445 | 162 | 0.210 | 127 | 108.2 | -77.1 | 15.4 |
David Ortiz | 3584 | 177 | 0.252 | 129 | 116.9 | -89.3 | 14.9 |
Bobby Higginson | 3434 | 134 | 0.208 | 118 | 80.9 | -60.3 | 13.5 |
Dave Kingman | 3385 | 204 | 0.252 | 115 | 55.4 | -44.8 | 13.2 |
Pat Burrell | 4145 | 188.0 | 0.221 | 117 | 73.1 | -78.5 | 12.9 |
Tony Clark | 3212 | 156 | 0.225 | 117 | 67.8 | -61.8 | 11.5 |
Jay Buhner | 2944 | 129 | 0.215 | 122 | 73.4 | -69.3 | 10.2 |
AVERAGE | 3341 | 151 | 0.221 | 122 | 91.6 | -51.8 | 15.2 |
Chris Davis | 3512 | 203 | 0.251 | 121 | 86.8 | -67.6 | 14.5 |
Davis comes up a little bit higher in terms of power, but in offensive value, he is right around the midpoint of the group. In a comparison Scott Boras is likely to love, Davis’ career through age-29 looks a lot like David Ortiz’. Nor is it just through age 29 where the comparison exists. As only players with good age-29 seasons were included in the group, here are the above players’ age-29 seasons, among which group Davis compares favorably.

Name | PA | HR | ISO | wRC+ | Off | Def | WAR |
Tino Martinez | 685 | 44 | 0.281 | 141 | 35.9 | -5.9 | 5.3 |
David Ortiz | 713 | 47 | 0.304 | 157 | 45.7 | -17 | 5.3 |
Trot Nixon | 513 | 28 | 0.272 | 152 | 33.6 | -0.2 | 5.0 |
Carl Everett | 561 | 34 | 0.286 | 135 | 27.1 | 3.3 | 4.7 |
Bobby Higginson | 679 | 30 | 0.238 | 131 | 30.5 | -8.5 | 4.3 |
Cliff Floyd | 609 | 28 | 0.244 | 139 | 35.0 | -18.4 | 3.7 |
Kirk Gibson | 521 | 28 | 0.224 | 136 | 27.3 | -9.5 | 3.6 |
Ryan Klesko | 590 | 26 | 0.233 | 135 | 29.2 | -13.7 | 3.2 |
Jason Bay | 670 | 31 | 0.236 | 133 | 32.8 | -24.8 | 3.0 |
Lee May | 647 | 29 | 0.206 | 137 | 26.6 | -24.0 | 3.0 |
Jay Buhner | 436 | 21 | 0.263 | 138 | 21.5 | -10.6 | 2.5 |
Frank Howard | 549 | 18 | 0.164 | 127 | 16.4 | -10.4 | 2.3 |
Dave Kingman | 448 | 28 | 0.276 | 131 | 14.5 | -8.8 | 2.2 |
Tony Clark | 497 | 16 | 0.194 | 125 | 15.3 | -14.7 | 1.7 |
Pat Burrell | 567 | 29 | 0.245 | 126 | 14.6 | -18.1 | 1.5 |
AVERAGE | 579 | 29 | 0.244 | 136 | 27.1 | -12.1 | 3.4 |
Chris Davis | 670 | 47 | 0.300 | 147 | 36.3 | -5.5 | 5.6 |
While Davis’ age-29 season puts him even with some great seasons by David Ortiz and Tino Martinez, his inconsistent past, including a 2014 season in which he hit just .196/.300/.404, keep his comps on a more terrestrial level. The end of 2014 resulted in a 25-game suspension for Davis after he tested positive for Adderall twice. He had a therapeutic use exemption for the drug prior to 2013, but did not have one for either 2013 or 2014 when he was suspended. He gained an exemption this past season for a different drug to treat his attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, so the matter is unlikely to cause trouble again.
Among the players we find here, David Ortiz appears to profile as the most promising of comparables for Davis, but at age 30 and beyond, Ortiz is not even the best of Davis’ comps. That honor goes to Frank Howard. The chart below reveals the performance in the theoretical first four years of Davis’ free agent deal, where his team would hope for the best performance before a likely decline near the end of a contract.

Name | PA | HR | ISO | wRC+ | Off | Def | WAR |
Frank Howard | 2656 | 172 | 0.269 | 163 | 183.2 | -90 | 19.4 |
Kirk Gibson | 1851 | 66 | 0.182 | 128 | 70.0 | 0.8 | 13.7 |
David Ortiz | 2471 | 140 | 0.279 | 141 | 114.2 | -59.7 | 13.6 |
Ryan Klesko | 2217 | 89 | 0.217 | 135 | 106.8 | -61.3 | 11.7 |
Jay Buhner | 2157 | 139 | 0.275 | 126 | 73.1 | -51.1 | 9.5 |
Tino Martinez | 2540 | 106 | 0.201 | 107 | 21.5 | -27.9 | 8.1 |
Lee May | 2389 | 97 | 0.184 | 114 | 36.3 | -43.8 | 7.3 |
Cliff Floyd | 1884 | 81 | 0.210 | 116 | 47.2 | -36.4 | 7.2 |
Dave Kingman | 1888 | 125 | 0.263 | 122 | 49.2 | -59.2 | 5.6 |
Trot Nixon | 1444 | 30 | 0.139 | 102 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 5.6 |
Pat Burrell | 2156 | 97 | 0.220 | 118 | 38.9 | -54.0 | 5.6 |
Jason Bay | 1763 | 62 | 0.182 | 107 | 23.9 | -27.4 | 5.3 |
Bobby Higginson | 2203 | 53 | 0.146 | 103 | 5.7 | -31.5 | 4.9 |
Carl Everett | 1779 | 65 | 0.186 | 104 | 5.1 | -45.5 | 2.0 |
Tony Clark | 1254 | 65 | 0.230 | 100 | -5.6 | -18.3 | 1.8 |
AVERAGE | 2043 | 92 | 0.212 | 119 | 51.4 | -40.0 | 8.1 |
AVG/YR | 511 | 23 | 0.212 | 119 | 12.9 | -10.0 | 2.0 |
Howard was a massive (6-foot-7, 250 pound) outfielder and three true outcomes hitter before they became en vogue. He walked in more than 10% of his career plate appearances and struck out nearly 20% time, 30%-40% more than league average. He had always hit well with the Dodgers, but after moving to the Washington Senators, his career took off with three straight five-win seasons, while recording at least 44 homers and a 160 wRC+ in all three years. As for Ortiz, little needs to be said about him that the reader won’t already know. Overall the group hit pretty well, but as defensive numbers declined, the group as a whole struggled to stay above average.
Jeff Passan at Yahoo rated Davis his top free agent position player, and Jon Heyman rated him the second overall free agent, predicting a seven-year, $182 million contract — while both Dave Cameron and the FanGraphs crowd gave Davis a more modest five-year contract at around $20 million per year. Looking at the comps above, we can attempt to place a value on the potential seven-year deal. The following chart adds ages 34-36 to the above chart to show the total value.

Name | PA | HR | ISO | wRC+ | Off | Def | WAR |
Frank Howard | 3908 | 220 | 0.239 | 151 | 217.2 | -128.3 | 23.4 |
David Ortiz | 4065 | 224 | 0.272 | 145 | 188 | -99.0 | 22.8 |
Kirk Gibson | 2905 | 97 | 0.176 | 119 | 76.8 | -26.8 | 15.0 |
Ryan Klesko | 3154 | 113 | 0.199 | 127 | 113.9 | -74.4 | 14.1 |
Tino Martinez | 4201 | 165 | 0.191 | 107 | 29.1 | -49.5 | 12.1 |
Jay Buhner | 2983 | 181 | 0.264 | 124 | 94.1 | -72.8 | 12.0 |
Cliff Floyd | 2507 | 101 | 0.197 | 113 | 49.5 | -48.6 | 8.3 |
Dave Kingman | 3440 | 203 | 0.236 | 115 | 62.6 | -100.2 | 8.0 |
Lee May | 4099 | 168 | 0.176 | 107 | 29.3 | -87.3 | 7.9 |
Pat Burrell | 2375 | 104 | 0.216 | 118 | 43.2 | -60.1 | 6.1 |
Trot Nixon | 1485 | 31 | 0.138 | 101 | -0.1 | 5.9 | 5.6 |
Jason Bay | 1999 | 73 | 0.183 | 106 | 22.3 | -35.0 | 5.2 |
Bobby Higginson | 2230 | 53 | 0.144 | 101 | 0.6 | -32.9 | 4.3 |
Carl Everett | 2669 | 99 | 0.178 | 97 | -14.4 | -65.9 | 1.1 |
Tony Clark | 1830 | 91 | 0.217 | 95 | -22.8 | -30.9 | 0.7 |
AVERAGE | 2923 | 128 | 0.202 | 115 | 59.3 | -60.4 | 9.7 |
AVG/YR | 418 | 18 | 0.202 | 115 | 8.5 | -8.6 | 1.4 |
Those last three years don’t add much value to the overall value of this group, as the players continue to decline. On average, the Davis comps added just half a win per player per season in the final three years. Only four of 15 players were able to average two wins per season over the full seven years. Teams should expect this decline and hopefully gain a surplus of value in the first few years of any contract before a likely overpayment near the end.
The graph below features three sets of numbers: the average values of the comps separated into thirds, lowest to highest. This should provide reasonable expectations for Davis in the best case, most reasonable, and worst case scenario. The values are based on the current cost of a win at $8 million and rising 5% per year from inflation. As the charts above would suggest, there is a great disparity in potential values.
Averaging the 15 players instead of dividing them into thirds yields around $91 million over seven years. Using only the WAR averages from the first four seasons results in a value right around $70 million. Like any player who has shown he is capable of hitting 50 home runs, Davis has some really good, really impressive comps. Unfortunately, the big power, no defense profile does not always age well into a player’s 30s. Davis is certainly capable of continuing his 2015 season into the future, but there is considerable downside. If the amounts speculated about come close to his eventual contract, the signing team will be taking a substantial bet on his upside, but exposing themselves to considerable risk.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
I’m guessing the comment: “only Edwin Encarnacion is even within 20 home runs” is meant to say 10 as Edwin has only 8 fewer home runs since 2012.
He meant exactly what he said: No one other than myself is within 20 home runs of Crush.
Ahh my bad. Was too focused on the exact figures and not the intent of the comment.
The “20 home run” spread is a comparison to the third</i< guy on the list: Nelson Cruz at 135, which is 25 fewer than Davis. Thus the only player "within 20" (or even 24) home runs of Davis is the guy ahead of Cruz, Edwin Encarnacion.