Chris Davis: A Risk in Free Agency
Chris Davis is a man of prodigious strength. His efforts, or sometimes lack thereof, have been chronicled by FanGraphs multiple times. Since Davis’ first season with the Baltimore Orioles in 2012, he leads all of major league baseball with 159 home runs and only Edwin Encarnacion is even within 20 home runs of him. Just 10 players are within 50 home runs of Davis over the last four years, which means even if Davis had hit zero home runs in 2015 instead of 47, he would rank in the top 10 over the last four years. As power has become increasingly rare over the past decade, Davis made a great comeback after a disappointing 2014 and is set to get paid in free agency this winter. Looking for comparable players, we can attempt to find out how much that great power is worth as Davis heads into his 30s.
To find historical comps for Davis, first I looked for players from 1960 through 2008 who’d produced a similar number of wins in a similar time framce — in this case, between 10 and 20 WAR through their age-29 seasons. As this is not an incredibly high bar, there were more than 300 players in resulting pool. To further narrow sample, I looked for players who fit a similar offensive profile, so within 10 points of Davis’ 121 wRC+ mark and at least a .200 isolated slugging (Davis’ is .251). This narrowed down the list to 42 players. Limiting the list only to players within 25% of Davis’ 3,512 plate appearances left just 31 players. Davis is coming off 47 home runs, a 147 wRC+, and a 5.6 WAR. Eliminating all players with a wRC+ below 125 or under 400 PA in their age-29 seasons left 15 players, many of whom appear very Chris Davis-like.
| Name | PA | HR | ISO | wRC+ | Off | Def | WAR |
| Lee May | 3716 | 176 | 0.214 | 127 | 107.9 | -58.2 | 19.6 |
| Kirk Gibson | 3104 | 126 | 0.205 | 128 | 112.9 | -31.8 | 19.1 |
| Trot Nixon | 2739 | 106 | 0.218 | 122 | 77.9 | -1.4 | 16.8 |
| Carl Everett | 2726 | 103 | 0.202 | 117 | 63.0 | 19.2 | 16.4 |
| Tino Martinez | 3495 | 157 | 0.211 | 115 | 67.4 | -19.1 | 16.4 |
| Cliff Floyd | 3556 | 132 | 0.209 | 121 | 107.4 | -54.8 | 16.3 |
| Ryan Klesko | 3369 | 165 | 0.242 | 128 | 120.8 | -61.3 | 16.0 |
| Jason Bay | 3259 | 149 | 0.234 | 130 | 141.4 | -88.2 | 15.9 |
| Frank Howard | 3445 | 162 | 0.210 | 127 | 108.2 | -77.1 | 15.4 |
| David Ortiz | 3584 | 177 | 0.252 | 129 | 116.9 | -89.3 | 14.9 |
| Bobby Higginson | 3434 | 134 | 0.208 | 118 | 80.9 | -60.3 | 13.5 |
| Dave Kingman | 3385 | 204 | 0.252 | 115 | 55.4 | -44.8 | 13.2 |
| Pat Burrell | 4145 | 188.0 | 0.221 | 117 | 73.1 | -78.5 | 12.9 |
| Tony Clark | 3212 | 156 | 0.225 | 117 | 67.8 | -61.8 | 11.5 |
| Jay Buhner | 2944 | 129 | 0.215 | 122 | 73.4 | -69.3 | 10.2 |
| AVERAGE | 3341 | 151 | 0.221 | 122 | 91.6 | -51.8 | 15.2 |
| Chris Davis | 3512 | 203 | 0.251 | 121 | 86.8 | -67.6 | 14.5 |
Davis comes up a little bit higher in terms of power, but in offensive value, he is right around the midpoint of the group. In a comparison Scott Boras is likely to love, Davis’ career through age-29 looks a lot like David Ortiz’. Nor is it just through age 29 where the comparison exists. As only players with good age-29 seasons were included in the group, here are the above players’ age-29 seasons, among which group Davis compares favorably.
| Name | PA | HR | ISO | wRC+ | Off | Def | WAR |
| Tino Martinez | 685 | 44 | 0.281 | 141 | 35.9 | -5.9 | 5.3 |
| David Ortiz | 713 | 47 | 0.304 | 157 | 45.7 | -17 | 5.3 |
| Trot Nixon | 513 | 28 | 0.272 | 152 | 33.6 | -0.2 | 5.0 |
| Carl Everett | 561 | 34 | 0.286 | 135 | 27.1 | 3.3 | 4.7 |
| Bobby Higginson | 679 | 30 | 0.238 | 131 | 30.5 | -8.5 | 4.3 |
| Cliff Floyd | 609 | 28 | 0.244 | 139 | 35.0 | -18.4 | 3.7 |
| Kirk Gibson | 521 | 28 | 0.224 | 136 | 27.3 | -9.5 | 3.6 |
| Ryan Klesko | 590 | 26 | 0.233 | 135 | 29.2 | -13.7 | 3.2 |
| Jason Bay | 670 | 31 | 0.236 | 133 | 32.8 | -24.8 | 3.0 |
| Lee May | 647 | 29 | 0.206 | 137 | 26.6 | -24.0 | 3.0 |
| Jay Buhner | 436 | 21 | 0.263 | 138 | 21.5 | -10.6 | 2.5 |
| Frank Howard | 549 | 18 | 0.164 | 127 | 16.4 | -10.4 | 2.3 |
| Dave Kingman | 448 | 28 | 0.276 | 131 | 14.5 | -8.8 | 2.2 |
| Tony Clark | 497 | 16 | 0.194 | 125 | 15.3 | -14.7 | 1.7 |
| Pat Burrell | 567 | 29 | 0.245 | 126 | 14.6 | -18.1 | 1.5 |
| AVERAGE | 579 | 29 | 0.244 | 136 | 27.1 | -12.1 | 3.4 |
| Chris Davis | 670 | 47 | 0.300 | 147 | 36.3 | -5.5 | 5.6 |
While Davis’ age-29 season puts him even with some great seasons by David Ortiz and Tino Martinez, his inconsistent past, including a 2014 season in which he hit just .196/.300/.404, keep his comps on a more terrestrial level. The end of 2014 resulted in a 25-game suspension for Davis after he tested positive for Adderall twice. He had a therapeutic use exemption for the drug prior to 2013, but did not have one for either 2013 or 2014 when he was suspended. He gained an exemption this past season for a different drug to treat his attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, so the matter is unlikely to cause trouble again.
Among the players we find here, David Ortiz appears to profile as the most promising of comparables for Davis, but at age 30 and beyond, Ortiz is not even the best of Davis’ comps. That honor goes to Frank Howard. The chart below reveals the performance in the theoretical first four years of Davis’ free agent deal, where his team would hope for the best performance before a likely decline near the end of a contract.
| Name | PA | HR | ISO | wRC+ | Off | Def | WAR |
| Frank Howard | 2656 | 172 | 0.269 | 163 | 183.2 | -90 | 19.4 |
| Kirk Gibson | 1851 | 66 | 0.182 | 128 | 70.0 | 0.8 | 13.7 |
| David Ortiz | 2471 | 140 | 0.279 | 141 | 114.2 | -59.7 | 13.6 |
| Ryan Klesko | 2217 | 89 | 0.217 | 135 | 106.8 | -61.3 | 11.7 |
| Jay Buhner | 2157 | 139 | 0.275 | 126 | 73.1 | -51.1 | 9.5 |
| Tino Martinez | 2540 | 106 | 0.201 | 107 | 21.5 | -27.9 | 8.1 |
| Lee May | 2389 | 97 | 0.184 | 114 | 36.3 | -43.8 | 7.3 |
| Cliff Floyd | 1884 | 81 | 0.210 | 116 | 47.2 | -36.4 | 7.2 |
| Dave Kingman | 1888 | 125 | 0.263 | 122 | 49.2 | -59.2 | 5.6 |
| Trot Nixon | 1444 | 30 | 0.139 | 102 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 5.6 |
| Pat Burrell | 2156 | 97 | 0.220 | 118 | 38.9 | -54.0 | 5.6 |
| Jason Bay | 1763 | 62 | 0.182 | 107 | 23.9 | -27.4 | 5.3 |
| Bobby Higginson | 2203 | 53 | 0.146 | 103 | 5.7 | -31.5 | 4.9 |
| Carl Everett | 1779 | 65 | 0.186 | 104 | 5.1 | -45.5 | 2.0 |
| Tony Clark | 1254 | 65 | 0.230 | 100 | -5.6 | -18.3 | 1.8 |
| AVERAGE | 2043 | 92 | 0.212 | 119 | 51.4 | -40.0 | 8.1 |
| AVG/YR | 511 | 23 | 0.212 | 119 | 12.9 | -10.0 | 2.0 |
Howard was a massive (6-foot-7, 250 pound) outfielder and three true outcomes hitter before they became en vogue. He walked in more than 10% of his career plate appearances and struck out nearly 20% time, 30%-40% more than league average. He had always hit well with the Dodgers, but after moving to the Washington Senators, his career took off with three straight five-win seasons, while recording at least 44 homers and a 160 wRC+ in all three years. As for Ortiz, little needs to be said about him that the reader won’t already know. Overall the group hit pretty well, but as defensive numbers declined, the group as a whole struggled to stay above average.
Jeff Passan at Yahoo rated Davis his top free agent position player, and Jon Heyman rated him the second overall free agent, predicting a seven-year, $182 million contract — while both Dave Cameron and the FanGraphs crowd gave Davis a more modest five-year contract at around $20 million per year. Looking at the comps above, we can attempt to place a value on the potential seven-year deal. The following chart adds ages 34-36 to the above chart to show the total value.
| Name | PA | HR | ISO | wRC+ | Off | Def | WAR |
| Frank Howard | 3908 | 220 | 0.239 | 151 | 217.2 | -128.3 | 23.4 |
| David Ortiz | 4065 | 224 | 0.272 | 145 | 188 | -99.0 | 22.8 |
| Kirk Gibson | 2905 | 97 | 0.176 | 119 | 76.8 | -26.8 | 15.0 |
| Ryan Klesko | 3154 | 113 | 0.199 | 127 | 113.9 | -74.4 | 14.1 |
| Tino Martinez | 4201 | 165 | 0.191 | 107 | 29.1 | -49.5 | 12.1 |
| Jay Buhner | 2983 | 181 | 0.264 | 124 | 94.1 | -72.8 | 12.0 |
| Cliff Floyd | 2507 | 101 | 0.197 | 113 | 49.5 | -48.6 | 8.3 |
| Dave Kingman | 3440 | 203 | 0.236 | 115 | 62.6 | -100.2 | 8.0 |
| Lee May | 4099 | 168 | 0.176 | 107 | 29.3 | -87.3 | 7.9 |
| Pat Burrell | 2375 | 104 | 0.216 | 118 | 43.2 | -60.1 | 6.1 |
| Trot Nixon | 1485 | 31 | 0.138 | 101 | -0.1 | 5.9 | 5.6 |
| Jason Bay | 1999 | 73 | 0.183 | 106 | 22.3 | -35.0 | 5.2 |
| Bobby Higginson | 2230 | 53 | 0.144 | 101 | 0.6 | -32.9 | 4.3 |
| Carl Everett | 2669 | 99 | 0.178 | 97 | -14.4 | -65.9 | 1.1 |
| Tony Clark | 1830 | 91 | 0.217 | 95 | -22.8 | -30.9 | 0.7 |
| AVERAGE | 2923 | 128 | 0.202 | 115 | 59.3 | -60.4 | 9.7 |
| AVG/YR | 418 | 18 | 0.202 | 115 | 8.5 | -8.6 | 1.4 |
Those last three years don’t add much value to the overall value of this group, as the players continue to decline. On average, the Davis comps added just half a win per player per season in the final three years. Only four of 15 players were able to average two wins per season over the full seven years. Teams should expect this decline and hopefully gain a surplus of value in the first few years of any contract before a likely overpayment near the end.
The graph below features three sets of numbers: the average values of the comps separated into thirds, lowest to highest. This should provide reasonable expectations for Davis in the best case, most reasonable, and worst case scenario. The values are based on the current cost of a win at $8 million and rising 5% per year from inflation. As the charts above would suggest, there is a great disparity in potential values.
Averaging the 15 players instead of dividing them into thirds yields around $91 million over seven years. Using only the WAR averages from the first four seasons results in a value right around $70 million. Like any player who has shown he is capable of hitting 50 home runs, Davis has some really good, really impressive comps. Unfortunately, the big power, no defense profile does not always age well into a player’s 30s. Davis is certainly capable of continuing his 2015 season into the future, but there is considerable downside. If the amounts speculated about come close to his eventual contract, the signing team will be taking a substantial bet on his upside, but exposing themselves to considerable risk.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

I’m guessing the comment: “only Edwin Encarnacion is even within 20 home runs” is meant to say 10 as Edwin has only 8 fewer home runs since 2012.
He meant exactly what he said: No one other than myself is within 20 home runs of Crush.
Ahh my bad. Was too focused on the exact figures and not the intent of the comment.
The “20 home run” spread is a comparison to the third</i< guy on the list: Nelson Cruz at 135, which is 25 fewer than Davis. Thus the only player "within 20" (or even 24) home runs of Davis is the guy ahead of Cruz, Edwin Encarnacion.
That effortless HR article is one of the best articles ever written.
I was surprised not to see Ryan Howard on the list, but it looks like his wRC+ through age-29 is actually too high to be on this list.
The fact that Ryan Howard’s wrc+ is too HIGH to be on this list is probably the single most compelling reason for everybody to be extremely careful with Chris Davis.
Don’t do it America!!! 3 years 50 million! that’ll be fine.
Who are your predictions to take home the 2016 awards? See who I got on our latest blog – http://platinumseriesbaseball.com/predicting-2016-award-winners/
You spammy piece of shit.
The term spam is derived from the 1970 Spam sketch of the BBC television comedy series Monty Python’s Flying Circus.The sketch is set in a cafe where nearly every item on the menu includes Spam canned luncheon meat. As the waiter recites the Spam-filled menu, a chorus of Viking patrons drowns out all conversations with a song repeating “Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam… lovely Spam! wonderful Spam!”, hence “Spamming” the dialogue.
Spam eggs sausage and spam. It doesn’t have as much spam in it!
THE WORDS SPEAKETH THE MIND!
I do not appreciate being compared with Pete.
Crush your enemies. See them driven before you. Hear the lamentations of their women.
Dayn Perry, is that you?
CHRIS DAVIS: THE MAN! THE FUTUR! THE NEXT 1ST BASE MAN! FOR THE SEATTLE MARENERS.
Use spellcheck, bitch.
Get that hairball out of your throat, jerk off.
I like to be very precise with my home runs.
Haha
Can someone go over the concept of win prices again? I feel like almost every article I read is about why certain players are “overpays”. And the concept that almost every massive contract is an overpay.
Here’s the thing though – the market keeps constantly doling out these mega-contracts, even though the analytic community keeps bashing them as “overpays”.
My question: Is the free agent win value (around $6 mil to $8 mil per win) calculated linearly? I need to read up again. There are just some truths, like how most 6+ WAR players are pre FA team-controlled. And with teams signing so many extensions, free agency in general isn’t a huge source of talent. But, every year teams have money to burn.
Maybe, phrasing this question another way, if all these top contracts are so bad, what’s a different model? Caus with all the brainpower influx to baseball, you think we’d have seen a different model for high payroll teams beside the $100 million contracts by now.
The various CBA agreements keep restricting other kinds of spending, meaning that there is nothing to use payroll space on except free agency. The players who are negotiating the CBA have a clear incentive to want it to be this way. So there isn’t really another model because it’s kind of like spend here or nowhere.
And, there was just an article on this site about the biggest potential free agent bargains. So not everything is always an overpay, but there is a player profile that has a tendency to seemingly be overvalued by the market.
The last time Frank Howard was 250 lbs. he was still playing basketball.
Yes, Davis is a risk, but that is what will contain his price. The Yankees would be stupid not to sign him. 2014 is totally ADD related.
Yankees have Bird and Teixeira, and Arod at DH. No room for him. Red Sox OTOH can use him at 3B. There is no way Hanley is going to make it at 1B and Hanley will DH after Papi leaves after 2016
I like how you dismiss the Yankees because they have no position to use him while using another team that has no room to add him. Chris Davis signing to play a position he shouldn’t be playing full time at in 2016 is pretty much exactly what the Sox just did with Hanley.
Chris Davis playing 3B while Pablo Sandoval collects $17M to sit on the bench wouldn’t be the best thing to have assuming the Sox can’t trade Pablo. Chris Davis is also a bad 3B even if he’s capable of patrolling it, not 2015 Sandoval bad but bad enough that you might not want him there.
Roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids…roids
…roids
***rhoids?
I had rhoids.
Technically speaking, if 10 players are within 50 of Davis, 11 players hit 109 or more HR, including Davis. Just giving us this does not mean that Davis and his 112 HR from 2012-2014 would have been a guarantee to be a top-10 2012-2015 total had he hit 0 in 2015. If all 10 of those others players are actually at 113+ (within 50 still) then Davis would’ve ranked 11th. I don’t know whether that’s true or not, but just telling us 10 are within 50 does not mean he would’ve ranked top-10 if he missed 2015.
It is a little harsh to describe Davis as a “no defense” player. His UZR 150 last year was 4th in baseball at first base. Moreover, he isn’t bad in right field.
I know, he’s actually been a fine 1B the last 4 years
Every FA is a risk. The biggest risk with Davis is if MLB grants him a TUE for his ADD. His only bad year since 2012 was a year in which they did not give him a TUE and he susbsequently got suspended for amphetamines. He is only 30 yo next year and as we have seen with great sluggers like Ortiz and Arod, there is no reason he can’t continue to hit HR till he is 40. I would feel very comfortable giving him 7/150 if I were an AL GM and had some confidence the TUE would not be withdrawn again.
Respectfully disagree. As the article shows, this type of player has not aged very well historically. Could happen, but the odds aren’t in favor of his providing much value into his mid-30’s and beyond.
I have to seriously question anyone who has Davis any higher than the third best position player available.
And I’d be shocked if his contract is larger than Heyward or Upton.
Also any GM that pays this guy more than Heyward gets should be immediately fired.
It isn’t 1998 anymore. Teams are much smarter.
Finally thank goodness the Yankees are far too smart to sign this guy.
That being said I’m sure he’ll have several very nice years sandwiched around a disaster or two
I could see him getting more than Upton. More per year, at least.
Maybe per year but teams are more and more putting a premium in age.
And defense.
Chris Davis’ Steamer wOBA projection isn’t much better than Chris Colabello’s.
If you basically average a great year a disaster and a very good year, yeah you’ll get Colabelo i guess.
The projections don’t know any Davis’ kicking adhd meds for a season then getting back on them.
I’m fairly comfortable saying Davis will be SIGNIFICANTLY better than Davis.
Projections are always going to be hinky with too many variables or a bunch of subjective factors like medical issues, comfort, mechanical overhauls and injury.
Davis is a player for whom projections aren’t terribly helpful.
Than colabello that should read.