CJ Abrams Takes The Lead

Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

CJ Abrams befuddles me. There’s no question that he has plus raw power in his bat. Look at this year’s statistics; he’s sitting in the 81st percentile for maximum exit velocity. But despite that fact, he’s in the 10th percentile for average exit velocity, and the 17th for hard-hit rate. He’s a power hitter! He’s a slap hitter! Both are true.

Likewise, I’m not quite sure what to make of the rest of his game. He has blazing straight line speed, and he uses that to his advantage on the basepaths. We have him down as the third-most valuable baserunner in the majors this year, behind only Esteury Ruiz and Corbin Carroll. But almost all of that value comes on stolen bases – he’s 25th in UBR, which measures non-steal advancement. And on defense, he has tremendous range and an average throwing arm, but grades out somewhere between average (DRS) and poor (OAA) anyway. His profile is a series of contradictions.

The thing is, all of these have been true about Abrams since the Padres drafted him in the first round in 2019. He was a divisive prospect from the start; it was never clear whether he’d end up as a slugging second baseman or a rangy, leadoff-hitting shortstop. Then the pandemic canceled the 2020 minor league season, and he missed most of 2021 with injury even as the Padres aggressively promoted him. Suddenly he was debuting in the big leagues at 21 as an injury replacement for, gulp, Fernando Tatis Jr. Life comes at you fast.

Sometimes, it recedes pretty quickly too. The Padres sent Abrams back down to the minors in May of his debut season, then called him back up again as they struggled to replace Tatis in their lineup. Then they shipped him to Washington as part of the Juan Soto return. He struggled mightily in San Diego, struggled more in D.C., and came out of the gates slowly in 2023. Could the answer to the question “Is Abrams a power or contact hitter?” somehow be neither?

If the past month or so is any indication, Abrams might have found a happy medium. I’m about to commit a sabermetric faux pas: I think that a lot of Abrams’ improvement can be traced to his batting leadoff. He batted exclusively in the bottom third of the order through July 6. On July 7, the Nats moved him to the top of the order, and he’s looked like a completely different hitter since then. His baserunning and fielding are smaller issues, because both look like they’ll be solid enough in the end. If Abrams can hit, he’s valuable, and now he’s hitting.

Of course, anyone can get hot for a month and a half, and Abrams hasn’t even been that hot; he has a 109 wRC+ since making the switch. But I think that a number of changes in his offensive approach stemmed from that change, and that Abrams’ game is well-suited to the mindset he’s bringing to the plate these days. Let’s compare and contrast to see what Abrams has changed and how it might help.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The mindset involved in hitting leadoff can be boiled down to a single statement: get on base. That comes with tradeoffs, but the easiest way to do that is to swing at bad pitches less frequently, and miss them less frequently when you do. Abrams has done just that:

Turning the Page
Statistic Pre-7/7 Post-7/7
Chase% 38.1% 32.6%
Chase% (Ahead) 36.5% 27.7%
Whiff% 23.8% 20.1%

Obviously, there are tradeoffs in this approach. One possible side effect of swinging less often at balls is swinging less frequently at strikes. But that hasn’t been Abrams’ deal; he swung at 72.4% of pitches in the zone before switching to leadoff, and he’s swinging at 72.6% since. A granular analysis of in/out of zone can miss subtle changes, but even if you look at pitches right down the heart of the plate, he swung at 75.4% before the switch and 72.6% since. That’s just not much of a difference.

That leaves three options: either Abrams waved a magic wand over his eyes to improve his pitch recognition, he’s on a hot streak, or he’s doing something against a particular pitch that helps his entire game. Turns out, it’s the last of the three. The worst pitch in baseball to swing at is a fastball outside the strike zone. Abrams was awful – awful – about it early in the year, swinging at 37.9% of these pitches, which should be easy takes. The league average is 25.2% – and since July 7, he’s swinging at 25.9% of them.

A fastball outside of the strike zone is pretty much the worst option for pitchers. Batters rarely chase them, which means better counts for the opposing hitter without much chance of something good happening. But Abrams was letting opposing pitchers off the hook game after game. It might not sound like much, but swinging less often at bad pitches does so much for you as a hitter. Not only do you get ahead in the count more frequently, but you put bad pitches into play less often.

Speaking of putting pitches into play, I mentioned Abrams’ whiff rate up above, and that too has taken a turn for the better. That’s partially because he’s swinging at fewer fastballs that he should be taking, but it’s also because he’s staying within himself more frequently.

What do I mean by that? Despite Abrams’ improvement at the plate in the last month and a half, he’s hitting the ball hard far less frequently. 36.1% of his batted balls left the bat at 95 mph or harder before he switched to leadoff; since then, he’s down to 29.6%. Neither of these numbers are good – the league average is around 40% – but he seems to be sacrificing a bit of hard contact as part of a “chase fewer fastballs” mindset.

The weird thing about it? You’ll note that I didn’t say that his contact quality is down. By pretty much any measure you can think of, he’s doing just fine in that category even with fewer hard-hit balls. His xwOBA on contact is up over the past month and a half. He’s hitting more barrels (8% against 5.9%) and more line drives. When he gets the ball in the air, he’s pulling it slightly more frequently, and he still has enough power that those pulled air balls have been quite valuable.

In other words, it seems like the tradeoff is working. He’s sacrificed hard hit frequency, but not much else. He’s walking more often, though still quite rarely, and striking out far less. His on-base percentage has skyrocketed from .281 to .339. That’s not some BABIP fluke, either; he’s running a .306 BABIP in his recent hot streak, hardly an unsustainable clip. For what it’s worth (and honestly, not a ton in samples this small), Statcast thinks he deserves an even higher batting average based on his contact quality.

Abrams himself isn’t quite sure what’s changed. “I don’t know if it’s approach. It’s more the comfortability part of it,” he told Howard Megdal of Baseball Prospectus of his recent heater. He’s not up there trying to take walks – and given his history, that seems pretty reasonable. Perhaps he really is just more comfortable now, and the bad swings are falling away naturally.

This is a short enough burst that it could absolutely just be a hot streak. Anybody can do anything in a small enough sample, and we’re only looking at 167 plate appearances worth so far. All the hair splitting I’m doing could be washed out by a week of intemperate swinging and hard-hit grounders. But consider the alternative: Abrams had less than 350 professional plate appearances under his belt when he debuted in the majors. He’s only 22, and he just crossed the thousand-PA mark this June. It’s hardly surprising that he’s struggled intermittently; Dylan Crews and James Wood, the two heralded prospects that top the Nationals system, aren’t much younger. Maybe this is Abrams finding his way in the big leagues. Washington’s rebuild is looking better than ever, and he’s no small reason why.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
matt
2 years ago

What’s weird to me is that just by the eye test on defense he clearly has incredible range yet struggles throwing on the run, particularly on balls up the middle he just looks uncomfortable spinning into a throw. Though when he’s set he looks great, particularly turning double plays, he’s been a big part of the Nats being 2nd in double plays turned this year. To my eye he seems somewhat reminiscent of Ian Desmond with better speed and probably better defensive upside.

Last edited 2 years ago by matt
Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  matt

I don’t fault WAS for aggressive promotion, but at the same time, you can’t be surprised by a kid still figuring out how to handle an extremely difficult defensive position with far more adjustments and nuance than any previous level he’s encountered while also trying to figure out how to develop as a baserunner, hitter, etc. It’s hard to look at McClain or Rustchman and not want that for your own guy, but that’s a pretty rare thing to occur (among the rarity of being a top prospect to begin with).

You can dream on the projection with good coaching and experience, but as much as we rightfully criticize clubs for pulling a Kris Bryant all too often, the minor leagues aren’t a waste of time for most guys there. And sometimes it just takes reps and adjustment (Bobby Miller might be a good pitching analogy)

Mahoney
2 years ago

Also, McClain and Rutschman (and Bryant) were college draftees, so moving quickly through the low minors is more of a feature than a bug in their development process. HS draftees surely benefit more.

Ralph Rowdie
2 years ago

It was the Padres who decided to promote him to the Majors with such little minor league time but I was kind of surprised Washington seemed willing to bring him right back up to the Majors after his acquisition.

jfisher6844
2 years ago

What’s the probability of Abrams still meeting the Trea Turner comps?

Turner from 2016-2020 was a .300 avg, 15 hrs, 40 sb guy before his power breakout.

Is it still realistic to expect Abrams to produce those numbers each year including the .300 average?

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  jfisher6844

It’s unlikely but not unreasonable. The strike zone control has to stick. One month of improvement isn’t there yet. But the fact that he’s done it means it’s possible.

Mahoney
2 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Your last sentence is SO important in looking at a guy’s ceiling. Performance is no guarantee of future performance, but it can highlight the possible upside.

And for Abrams, he has shown bits of all the components that have made Turner a stud. So there’s a chance he could go that route, or regress defensively and go a BJ Upton/Ian Desmond route, or have a strike zone control issue that he can’t figure out and go the Javy Baez route.

(And there’s still a chance that he’s a Hosmer/Heyward type early bloomer, and 2023 is the start of his 4-7 year career plateau. )

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

And it’s always important to mention that Ian Desmond or BJ Upton or Javy Baez would be a great outcome!

All of those guys spent several years as very good baseball players.

Mahoney
2 years ago

Heck, those are all above-average outcomes for guys drafted top ten overall!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  jfisher6844

I would guess if we had ZiPS report percentiles back to us that a .300 average would be around his 90th percentile. Maybe more like 95th percentile. His career average is at .250, and I don’t think he ran a .300 average in the upper minors where he would have benefitted from minor-league defense. He’s probably fine on the homers and stolen bases though, even if part of the reason for the stolen bases is that the league changed the rules.

Bjd1207
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Small note because it wasn’t much of a sample size but he did hit right around .300 in the upper minors (300ish PA’s). But to your point about defense in the minors, that was on a BABIP of about .360

didaceMember since 2024
2 years ago

Defense: OAA might be poor for the year but it has improved. Through June he had a OAA of -11. It was +1 for July and and so far August is +5. Defensive stats are flaky, but by my eye test it looks like the game has slowed down for him in the field. Batting is similar and speaks to his comfortable quote.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  didace

If there’s one archetype I’ll believe in to figure out their fielding, it’s shortstops with freaky athleticism and limited experience.

The kid entered the season with 171 career games at short, including the minor leagues.

Last edited 2 years ago by Cool Lester Smooth
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

CJ Abrams, OBP by month:

Mar/Apr: .296
May: .280
Jun: .247
Jul: .391
Aug: .267

That’s probably just a hot streak. It gives you hope that he’s capable of not swinging at those terrible pitches, since he did it for about a month. Doing it consistently is harder.

It does seem like his OAA has been more or less neutral lately, though. He’s got a -4 OAA on the year, and IIRC that’s what he had a couple of months ago too. If he can be average at shortstop and/or second base, he can muddle along as a below average hitter and guy who steals bases.

didaceMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

His OAA was -5 in April, -3 in May, and -3 in June, total -11. That he is now -4 for the year is stunning.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  didace

Wow, that is good news. I must have been thinking back to where it was in April. Here I was, thinking he had just figured it out and muddled along when he was still pretty bad until July.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Abrams has been a net-positive on offense, this year (with an xwOBA that says it’s earned)…and he just played his 320th professional game, not all of which have been at SS.

I don’t think it’s at all out of the question that he becomes an average or better SS.

Sonny LMember since 2017
2 years ago

This roller coaster player development isn’t strictly on the Nats. Start your career with one of the most aggressive orgs, lose a year to the pandemic + another to injury and all of a sudden teams have to make rule 5 decisions with significantly less game tape than they ever would have.

I’d wager to Abrams, Tork, Casas and company path will be more common

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Sonny L

Sure, you even see it with Jasson Dominguez getting thrown directly from showcase life into Low-A after a long layoff, without a stop in the DSL or CPX ball.

Imagine the hype train if the Yankees had him on the same schedule the Sox have taken with Mayer.

Mahoney
2 years ago

Mayer’s track and current struggles in AA got me thinking again about guys like JBJ and Kelenic who got brought up to non-rebuilding teams without ever had a tough patch in the minors. If they’re not Trout or J-Rod and they struggle for more than their first month in the majors, it causes a conflict between their developmental needs and the needs of the big-league team. So it may actually be better to push your very best prospects early on, so they learn how to deal with that adversity without affecting your MLB standings.

And coming back full circle to Abrams, if you’re rebuilding, it’s probably best to let your key rebuilding blocks work out the kinks with the big club. By the time you’ve emerged as contender again, those guys will have had the 1000+ PA under their belt that typically precedes the breakout into their peak years.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Sonny L

Pouring out one for Gavin Lux

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
2 years ago

Nats have been competitive recently and Abrams good. Martinez and Rizzo re-signed. It’s a good month

OkraMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

I’m not trying to be an ass, but what am i missing about the excitement surrounds resigning Rizzo/Martinez and the Nats in general right now? The team hasn’t been as horrible as many expected this year, but none of their young guys in the majors have taken a huge step forward that would get me super excited for the future. Yes, they have a highly ranked farm system now, but that hardly guarantees anything.

Last edited 2 years ago by Okra
joe_schlabotnik
2 years ago
Reply to  Okra

I think it’s pretty hard to not see things to be excited about for the nats. First off, this article is about a nats player taking a step forward. Cj abrams, at the very least is a controlled league average shortstop. That’s awesome. He could be substantially more than that. Keibert Ruiz is on fire in the second half (130 wrc+) after underperforming his woba the first half. Lane Thomas is under 3 (4?) more years of control, menesses is at worst an average bat, Riley Adams may be first base candidate, there’s tons to be happy about! Not to mention gore being a young and improving 3rd starter, gray being a rotation piece, and an actually solid bullpen. And that’s not even getting into the farm, which in addition to the Soto trade boost, has taken a step forward this year with homegrown players.

This website was publishing articles saying that the nats had the single worst farm system in the majors like one year ago. They have absolutely leapfrogged other rebuilds, the future is now visible without squinting. They drafted great this year and have two top 10 prospects coming up next year. Mike rizzo is flawed, but the old man pulled it off. As a nats fan I have been overjoyed by all these developments. I cannot wait for next season

OkraMember since 2016
2 years ago

Appreciate the counter view, but I just don’t see it. The Nats currently have the second worst run differential in the NL. Lane Thomas and Meneses are both significantly outperforming their xwOBA this year. Meneses is already 31 and was basically just a flash in the pan last year. Thomas is already 28 and is just having a BABIP fueled good year. As for younger pieces, it looks like this is who Ruiz is … a good not great catcher who most teams would like to have as part of their catching tandem. Abrams is still super young and has the ability add value different ways. I like him. But note that Abrams and Ruiz have combined for 2.1 WAR this year. On the pitching side, Gray just doesn’t look good. He fixed the homer issues this year but stopped striking guys out and still walks everyone. He’s a 5th starter. Gore looks pretty good. Elevated walk rate and lots of hard contact but any team would love to have him as solid #3 in your rotation who still has upside you can dream on. As for the farm, Wood and Crews look legitimately great. Love them both. But if you remove them the Nats farm has the same value as the A’s. So overall, two superstar prospects, other good pieces in Abrams/Gore/Ruiz, and some payroll space. I’m excited about Wood, Crews, and Abrams but don’t see this team challenging for the division anytime soon.

wadz
2 years ago
Reply to  Okra

The team was at rock bottom 1.. year ago when they traded Soto.

Theyre one of the best teams in MLB since the All Star Game.. after trading Candelario… They are set to win 15-20 games more than 2022… have a good young core.. a deep farm and a AA team filled with names like Dylan Crews, James Wood, Brady House, Trey Lipscomb and Robert Hassell…..

Going into the season most analysts were saying they’d be Royals level bad.. it’s been a remarkable year for the org… and they have close to a reset payroll to buy pitching..

joe_schlabotnik
2 years ago
Reply to  wadz

Yes across the board. There are also ample high variance guys that could take the step. They’ve been a bit lucky this year but whatever, they’re in a tough division, and god willing, they will finish above the pathetic Mets.

One thing I really like about rizzo is how unconventional he is, which is clear in the universal lambasting he receives from sites like this one, where everyone has crystal balls that allow them to see into the future of the game. The guy put together a World Series winner by actively seeking out old players to fill out his team that conventional wisdom had already cast aside. Howie Kendrick, Anibal, dozier, ass-cab, and Matt Adams all played substantial roles that year. There is more than one way to skin a cat, and rizzo is one of the only guys trying to prove that. Many things to not like about his drafting but somehow his methods work.

Dmjn53
2 years ago

I prefer my leadoff hitter to have an OBP higher than .302

Youppi!
2 years ago

surely he’s better than whatever warm body they had there last year before he took over. in fact, i had to dig a bit to remember who he even replaced: Alcides Escobar. then i dug a bit further and besides a bit more power, maybe he is a lot like Escobar.

time will tell. at least the kids are playin’.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Youppi!

Something like Escobar contact and Mondesi pop seems like a reasonable 75th percentile…and that’s a damn good player.

NATS FanMember since 2018
2 years ago

Ben, nobody helps me get through a Nats lousing season like you. Thanks!

pmart1995Member since 2016
2 years ago

The roto impact of Abrams moving to leadoff has also been lovely and undeniable: 20 SB (in 21 tries) in 37 games batting leadoff, vs. 13 SB in 80 other games. This is why fantasy managers haven’t been bothered about August’s wRC+ (75) looking a lot more like his April–June lines; 8 steals in 19 games is elite.

The bigger question for fantasy might be whether the steals are also a hot streak. He’s running Adalberto Mondesi SB numbers; if he can stay in the leadoff spot he’s getting into 2nd round territory, even if the rest of the batting line doesn’t improve much on 2023.

Groundout
2 years ago

It’s all very noisy, but per the rolling average graphs: last season was also characterized by a lot of swings outside the zone early, and then improvement later. That season, Abrams started seeing very few fastballs pretty quickly. He started chasing less, and the fastballs and the contact started coming back. So I guess what I see is an incredibly young player who’s demonstrated the ability to make adjustments. This season has followed a somewhat similar arc, but at a higher baseline.

Am I fitting a narrative to a very small sample? Sure. But I still feel glass half-full here.

Mahoney
2 years ago
Reply to  Groundout

If you’re going to fit a narrative to a very small sample, you’ve done a near perfect job of showing an example of a situation that allows for it, as well as how to properly present it.

(I could see Ben Clemens literally applying similar analysis as a successful investment analyst….)