Cleveland “No-Hit” Again, Continues Circling Drain

We have speed limits for a reason. Excessive speed is a factor in more than a quarter of automobile fatalities and is particularly deadly when combined with other dangerous behaviors behind the wheel. And yet, the idea that we can drive 5-10 mph over the limit without repercussion is so entrenched in our collective psyche — and so effectively decriminalized in most American cities — that most people hardly think twice about driving 35 in a 30. Behind this normalization lies an unexamined, exceptionalist belief: “This speed limit may be a good idea, but I have the ability to exceed it safely.”

There are a number of behaviors that fit into this category of exceptionalism: I’m the one who can get away with not flossing, I can spend hours on social media without consequence, I can stay cool into my 40s. Narcissism lies at the end of this road, but most of us don’t make it nearly that far. In doses, it’s entirely normal to think that general principles don’t apply to you personally. The contradiction at play is just part of the human experience, and it’s not always unhealthy: from this wellspring comes hope and ambition, among other traits and emotions.

As far as baseball is concerned, a no-hitter is perhaps the most wholesome embodiment of this form of individual exceptionalism. In the modern game, chasing a no-no is a retrograde “screw you,” not only to the opponent, but to the conventions of our time. “Take your third time through the order penalty and shove it,” and all that. Understandably, there was a bit of no-hitter fatigue swirling through the audience earlier this season. For me though, even with the increased frequency, the no-hitter remains a rebellion, and it’s as badass as ever.

Except when it’s not. This is hardly an original observation, but with rare exception, a combined no-no lacks much of the drama, most of the excitement, and every bit of the spice that a solo effort inspires. The relationship between the crowd and the tiring pitcher they’re rooting on is severed too early; like a steroid, the injection of fresh relievers reduces the degree of difficulty and spoils the accomplishment. One pitcher throwing nine hitless innings is a masterpiece; nine pitchers throwing a hitless inning is just another Wednesday.

Inevitably, team no-hitters will happen, and five Tampa Bay Rays managed to turn the trick yesterday, blanking Cleveland 4-0 in the second game of a double header. It’s the second combined no-hitter of the last fortnight, after Chicago’s back on June 24. That this one occurred in a seven-inning game with no one pitcher carrying even three innings of the load only dampens the significance of the occasion. I hate being the old man yelling at clouds, but even the teams themselves seem to feel this way. Craig Kimbrel didn’t know he’d put the final touches on the Cubs combined no-hitter two weeks ago, and after Vidal Brujan’s running catch sealed yesterday’s, the chuckles and grins in Tampa’s post-game handshake line seemed like the reward for an amusing novelty, not a historical feat.

In the other locker room, this was just the latest indignity in a growing list of them. The club will escape notoriety in the record books because yesterday’s contest was only seven innings (per the Elias Sports Bureau, MLB’s official statistician, the game’s seven inning nature pushes it into the realm of “notable achievement” rather than no-no, though Madison Bumgarner would surely disagree), but this was nonetheless Cleveland’s third hitless game in 84 tries. The hopefully-soon-to-be-Spiders dropped both ends of yesterday’s twin bill, dropping them to .500 on the season. Just two games out of first place on the morning of June 25, Cleveland has dropped 11 of 12 since, including their last nine, and has fallen entirely out of the race. And while toothless offense has been a problem — they’ve only scored 24 runs in the nine-game slide, a third of which came in Monday’s walk-off loss — it’s actually the pitchers who have torpedoed Cleveland’s postseason chances.

It’s mostly the rotation’s fault. With Shane Bieber, Aaron Civale, and Zach Plesac on the shelf and Triston McKenzie struggling to throw strikes, Cleveland has been forced to rely almost exclusively on reinforcements for weeks now. None of the aforementioned four have started a game since Civale went down with a finger injury on June 21, and not coincidentally, Cleveland has only won twice since.

Theoretically, the club was fairly well-positioned for this problem, as no team has spun more straw into gold on the mound than Cleveland over the last decade. But after underwhelming (and hitter-centric) returns for Francisco Lindor, Carlos Carrasco, Trevor Bauer, Corey Kluber, and Mike Clevinger, Cleveland’s depth was stretched to a breaking point and the replacements haven’t risen to the occasion:

New Cavalry Needed in Cleveland
GS IP K% BB% HR/9 GB% ERA FIP
Cal Quantrill 7 27 16.10% 5.60% 1 36.80% 6.67 4.02
Sam Hentges 7 24.2 19.50% 16.30% 1.09 41.60% 9.12 5.24
J.C. Mejia 6 22.2 18.60% 8.20% 1.59 44.30% 7.54 4.93
Eli Morgan 5 21.1 22.90% 4.20% 3.38 20.90% 8.44 6.68
Logan Allen 7 22.2 13.90% 10.20% 3.57 46.30% 9.13 8.73

Together, Hentges, Morgan, Allen, and Mejia have been unplayable this season, and Quantrill has struggled since his promotion to the rotation. In these past 12 games, this crew has notched a 10.53 ERA and a FIP over 7.00 despite working fewer than four innings per outing. All of that sounds bad enough, but when you look at these outings consecutively, you can see just how deep of a hole the rotation is digging this team every night:

12 Days of Christmas For Opponents
IP Runs SO BB HR
Cal Quantrill 4.33 6 2 1 1
Sam Hentges 3.34 6 1 4 2
Eli Morgan 5 4 4 0 2
Cal Quantrill 3.33 4 3 2 0
Logan Allen 3.67 3 3 2 1
J.C. Mejia 4 6 3 2 2
Sam Hentges 2.67 6 3 2 0
Eli Morgan 5 3 3 2 2
Cal Quantrill 5.33 3 3 2 1
Logan Allen 3.33 5 0 2 1
J.C. Mejia 2.67 6 2 2 1
Sam Hentges 4.33 4 3 3 0

This is a problem for a team that wasn’t exactly built to win slugfests. Even if Civale and Bieber return swiftly, the damage of the last two weeks won’t easily be undone, particularly since there would still be at least two holes at the back of the rotation.

The shame here is that a better staffed or less banged-up team could have made a credible charge for the division. Eight games behind the White Sox and sinking fast, Cleveland will not make the playoffs in 2021 (our Playoff Odds give them a 5.5% chance). Were they just a little closer and a little healthier, Chicago’s walking wounded would look vulnerable. As is, Detroit of all teams is the only other club within 15 games of first place; the pennant race in baseball’s worst division promises all the excitement of a jayvee window washing contest, whether the next no-hitter goes the full nine or not.





29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Left of Centerfield
2 years ago

I mentioned this a few weeks ago – that Cleveland was in a lot of trouble because they were going to be facing the toughest part of their schedule without a starting rotation (though Plesac comes back tonight). And even if the top 3 come back in the next few weeks, there are huge holes at the #4 and #5 spots in the rotation. Not to mention all the lineup issues. So hard to see them getting back into the race.

So what now? The front office has maintained all along that their goal is to remain competitive every year, instead of going through boom/bust cycles. But the idea that you can rebuild, stay competitive, and not spend $ all at the same time??? Yeah, Tampa pulls it off but they’re the exception, not the rule.

Personally, I’d like them to trade Jose Ramirez even though he’s my favorite player. He’s on a team-friendly contract for the next 2.5 years so should have a lot of value. Supposedly one of the barriers to trading Ramirez is that Cleveland has a Rule 5 issue next year and can’t take on more prospects. Seems like that issue is easily resolved by getting back guys who are ready to contribute now (and have more years of control than Ramirez) or by including some of the Rule 5 guys along with Ramirez in a trade.

Either way, I’m not optimistic about the next couple of years for Cleveland.

OddBall Herrera
2 years ago

The difficulty for Cleveland is that their recent history is rife with *so many* failed hitting prospects, and you can’t do the continuously competitive thing, especially as a small market club, if you are consistently whiffing on young talent.

sadtrombonemember
2 years ago

It is so hard to trade top position players like Ramirez when they’ve got a bunch of years left because it’s hard to get equal value back. I think that’s why guys usually get traded when they have 1.5-2 years left; that’s not the peak of their value but it’s the last time you can get back a load of talent and the first time you get fair value.

The other issue is the flip side of what you mentioned–we’re at a point where the buyers have already traded a huge chunk of their prospects and so there are fewer 40-man roster crunches to exploit. The 40-man roster crunches facing Cleveland and the Pirates are real but teams that have been more aggressive in the past like the Padres, Mets, Nationals, White Sox, and Brewers don’t exactly have a lot left to trade anymore. Like, does Cleveland want JD Davis and Mark Vientos? No, that’s not enough? What about Keston Hiura and Mario Feliciano? And teams like the Rays never consolidate so I don’t know whether they’d even consider something like that. They either need one of these teams’ farm systems to make major leaps forward or a team like the D-Backs to completely change their fortunes and make a deep run.

tz
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

And then there are buyers like the Red Sox. Casas alone or Duran alone won’t be enough, but moving both of them would be too much for as thin a system as Boston has. So you’d have to get very creative there.

My money is on Ramirez staying where he is, in large part because his cheap contract fits his team’s long-term objectives.

Left of Centerfield
2 years ago
Reply to  tz

Oh I don’t expect them to trade Ramirez. I just think that they should since I’m having a hard time seeing them contending during the rest of his contract. And there’s definite risk to holding on to him for too long and seeing him lose all his value. And I’m less concerned about them getting fair value or finding a trade partner since Cleveland seems to walk to the beat of their own drummer when it comes to making trades. I’m sure they could come up with something that will have the rest of us saying “Huh…didn’t see that coming”.

Demiurge
2 years ago

I don’t understand the lack of optimism. Per Eric’s latest evaluations, they currently have six 50 FV prospects with etas this year or in 2022, which includes McKenzie. They also have 27 prospects with 40+ or better FVs, a quantity matched only by the Rays, and most of them are expected to debut by 2023 if not sooner, and most of them are hitters. They clearly have one of the best farms right now and seem to always have. And because they have so many guys who are close to MLB ready they should have many potential suitors from teams who want to retool (or rebuild quickly) if they want to trade some of that excess for proven contributors.

Left of Centerfield
2 years ago
Reply to  Demiurge

I understand where you’re coming from. I would point out a few things in response:

1) Cleveland has a lot of prospects but they don’t have any “uber prospects”. I would guess that the vast majority of prospects from 40+ to 50 end up busting. And those that don’t bust tend to take longer to develop. Case in point: A number of the guys that are 40+ have played with Cleveland this year and have played poorly.

2) The timeline on a lot of these prospects is VERY ambitious. Cleveland tends to be very cautious when moving prospects up, particularly position players. For example, there’s simply no way that George Valera or Brayan Rocchio debut in 2022.

3) Most of their hitting prospects are middle infielders. Whereas at the major league level they desperately need OFers and perhaps a first baseman. They’ll probably need to make some trades but we have no idea if they’ll make the right decisions in terms of which middle infield prospects to trade away and which OFers to acquire.

4) Depth is a clear problem, particularly in the starting rotation. But where is that depth going to come from? Maybe they can get McKenzie straightened out. Otherwise, I’m not seeing much on the horizon.

Demiurge
2 years ago

All good points. I suppose my counter holds much more water if they were just willing to spend even 30mil or so in free agency every offseason, or mostly nail every trade like the Rays seem to do. Still, they have a lot of quality assets and a proven ability to maximize the talents of young pitchers. But I guess you chose to say “not optimistic” which is rather fair.

Left of Centerfield
2 years ago
Reply to  Demiurge

Yeah, I guess this year has made me question their ability to turn straw into gold re: starting pitchers. Granted guys like Morgan and Mejia weren’t highly rated so I wasn’t expecting much from them. But other guys like McKenzie and Hentges were. And Quantrill and Allen were also highly rated at one point. And it’s not just that they’ve struggled…they’ve been awful.

Guess we’ll see what they do re: spending for the coming year. They’ll have Hernandez and Rosario coming off the books. And maybe they’ll decline Perez’ option. But guys like Bieber and Reyes hit arbitration which will cost them $. So hard to see them investing in anyone that will make a real difference.

JupiterBrandomember
2 years ago

Tampa hasn’t even done it. They were pretty mediocre for most of the mid-2010s.

Left of Centerfield
2 years ago
Reply to  JupiterBrando

You’re right. I knew they had a couple of “off” seasons but forgot that it was 4 losing seasons in a row, bottoming out at 68-94.

pezzicle
2 years ago

“Supposedly one of the barriers to trading Ramirez is that Cleveland has a Rule 5 issue next year and can’t take on more prospects. Seems like that issue is easily resolved by getting back guys who are ready to contribute now”

that’s actually the opposite of how to fix that issue