Coaching Matt Bush

Once someone who’s erred has done his time, apologized, and satisfied society institutionally, there’s the matter of going on with life. This is true with every crime, however horrible, and the things Matt Bush did were horrible. He’s served his time — 39 months — and hopes we can forgive him. But that’s almost of secondary concern to him, at this point: life, and living, remains.

And Matt Bush, now perhaps the closer for the Texas Rangers, is doing his best to be a good baseball player because that’s the path in front of him. He believes any success he experiences in that role is due to the help he’s gotten. “Our pitching coaches are great, man, really great,” he suggested multiple times in our talk before a game against the Athletics this week.

It was his coaching staff that decided what his role would be. That noise about stretching him out and starting? “That was just offseason chatter that the media got a hold of,” said Bush, noting the difficulties of “going from a position like shortstop to starting pitcher.”

A quick scan at two-way players confirms how rare it is to transation from position player to starting pitcher. You have to go back to Hal Jeffcoat in 1957 to find a player who was a position player in the major leagues first, and then started as many as five games in a subsequent season.

Of course, Bush never made it to the majors as a shortstop, but he was sure he wasn’t going to be a starter. “Starting is something I feel like you need to do in high school and college,” the Rangers reliever said. “You can’t just jump into starting at a high level. It’s a lot to ask of the arm. Guys arms who are starting have been conditioned since childhood.”

It was his coaching staff that pointed out the maybe he should throw more curves than sliders this year. “The curve is best based on the numbers,” Bush said of results he discussed with his pitching coach, Doug Brocail. “The slider gets away from their bats but there’s a little more contact and I don’t always want that.”

Matt Bush’s Arsenal by Results
Pitch Thrown Reach% SwSTR% OPS
Fastball 694 25.6% 12.7% 0.672
Curve 187 34.7% 15.5% 0.364
Slider 138 31.5% 13.0% 0.500

In the early going, that’s fluctuated some and he’s actually throwing the slider more after another appearance. But it might also be a result of a focus on the fastball, which is his best pitch. It’s got top ten velocity among qualified relievers, paired with top-twenty spin rate (minimum 20 four-seamers thrown), and an extra inch or so of ride that has played well up in the zone, so Bush has gradually thrown it there more over time. Guess who coached him in that direction.

Recently, some shoulder soreness has slowed him. Not literally — his velocity is still there, he wanted to point out — but figuratively. “A little bit of a weightlifting injury,” said Bush. “I was maxing out on a bench press a few years ago… I had a little bit of heaviness feeling up top at the end of the year last year and had a cortisone shot.” When it lingered over the offseason, the pitcher had another shot.

His pitching coaches once again hope to help him through this. They told Bush he was “leaking.” He tried to explain: “I was falling down the rubber and my delivery wasn’t sound. All about the timing. I started leaning down the mound, and if you do that, your arm drags and you rely on all that arm strength. I worked on my front leg, when it comes up. I was straight up before, and as I would come up, I would start going forward down the mound instead of coming up first and staying back. Now I’m staying back, and getting my knee a little higher and back.”

Maybe we can see it. He demonstrated that he was taking his front knee back towards his back shoulder, higher and further back, so that his arm would match up better with his footfall, so focus on his front knee if you can see it.

Here he is late last year in Seattle:

Here he is in his last appearance in Seattle:

If it’s hard for us to see, that might be because we don’t have the right viewpoint, or that we are talking about inches. Or because we aren’t pitching coaches. Thankfully, Bush has good ones, and he ended on that note. “People always told me my mechanics are great, you’re perfect,” he shrugged. “It happens in pitching. You fall out of it a little bit. I fell out of a little bit, and the pitching coaches here are great, and they pointed it out.”





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
scotman144member
7 years ago

Great piece Eno. Am I the only MLB fan that would sooner have my favorite team sign every known PED offender in the game before they went near Matt Bush? If I were a Rangers fan I’d stop watching games once he comes in.

GoatHerdermember
7 years ago
Reply to  scotman144

Your lack of empathy and understanding towards drug and alcohol addiction implies little interaction with it. Consider yourself very blessed.

scotman144member
7 years ago
Reply to  GoatHerder

I have empathy for self-destructive acts. Verge into ruining others lives too and yup: you have lost me for good.

I am not saying he has no right to ply his craft. I am saying that I can not / could not root for his success even if he were theoretically wearing my favorite team’s uniform. I don’t wish him ill; I wish he (and others like Josh Leuke) were not a thing in Major League Baseball.

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago
Reply to  scotman144

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. For me, I don’t think that professional athletes should be held to a higher standard than the rest of us. They are good at running fast and throwing balls far, not being humanitarians. Some are, some aren’t and I am OK with it. I have no problem with you not being OK with it – lots of people share your perspective.

LHPSU
7 years ago
Reply to  scotman144

Thought exercise: How would you feel if he’s going to be a youth coach or a pastor, rather than a baseball player?

BigChief
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Myself, I’d still prefer my youth coach to have been someone who was caught taking steroids rather than a guy who almost killed someone and drove away.

I can get behind the idea of a pastor using a horrific incident like that to turn his life around and share his experience with others. And for whatever reason, a yolked, roided out pastor seems too intense. So I’ll go with near man-slaughter over roids for the pastor.

LHPSU
7 years ago
Reply to  BigChief

Setting aside any sentimental issues and speaking from a purely rational perspective, I would argue that good moral character is inherently part of the job description for a pastor since his role is to provide leadership and guidance (in theory at least…), but not for a baseball player. The notoriety that comes with being a public figure is incidental and it’s not Bush’s fault that the job he is most suited for happens to involve money and fame.

If I were a hypothetical official with full power to determine what kind of job Matt Bush can or cannot do, I would have no problem approving “professional sport”, but an application for “pastor” might be scrutinized a bit more. Food for thought for people who might be comfortable with the idea of Matt Bush as a pastor but not with Matt Bush as a baseball player.

BigChief
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Oh for sure. I don’t disagree with anything here. I also have no qualms with Matt Bush being allowed to play Baseball. Hell, I’d even root for him if he was on the team I supported, since rooting for him would be rooting for the team.

But like, I still wouldn’t be a fan of *his*. And if I could swap him for an equally talented(or even slightly less talented) player who hasn’t done the awful things he has, I would.

I’m aware that these type of sentiments aren’t super rational. I do try to be as logical as possible, but unfortunately I probably still fall towards the silly fanatic side of the spectrum, relative to most people on this site.

BigChief
7 years ago
Reply to  GoatHerder

How on earth can you assume scotman144 doesn’t have empathy and understanding towards drug and alcohol addictions from this comment?

I can’t speak for scotman144, but I can guess what makes it hard to root for Matt Bush isn’t the addiction, but rather, I find it rather difficult to cheer for a man who ran over a person’s head and fled the scene.

If somehow you think that statement implies a lack of understanding and empathy and therefore you assume I have had little interaction with Drug and Alcohol addiction, you would be sorely mistaken.

scotman144member
7 years ago
Reply to  BigChief

Well said BigChief. tung_twista has also covered the other crux of my stance in comments below: Bush demonstrated a pattern of repeated violent behavior well before the hit and run incident. I don’t care to recall the details but his full Wikipedia page is quite something. I can’t condone the violence and repeated causing of harm to others. I hope he is a changed man and he is fortunate that he has a golden right arm. Most with his record would have trouble finding employment of any kind.

tung_twista
7 years ago
Reply to  GoatHerder

Most alcoholics and drug addicts do NOT
beat up high school kids with golf clubs and assault women.
And most of them do not DUI and flee the scene after they hit a motorcycle.
I’m afraid you are the one who lacks understanding about drug and alcohol addiction.

John
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

The original claim by GoatHerder, that “Matt Bush should be understood as a drug addict and treated with empathy,” strikes me as pretty uncontroversial. But the addition you’ve made, or that you think is implied in this statement, and that you take issue with (“Matt Bush is not like an “average” drug addict, and deserves less empathy”) does strike me as odd.

Either you understand that severe addiction can turn people into monsters, and that the specifics of how that monster manifests is largely out of control of the addict, or you don’t. Yes, Matt Bush drove away from a near fatality, and beat up some teens. But to compare these actions to some imagined “average” addict doesn’t seem to be meaningful (respectfully, imho). If he killed someone, but *didn’t* drive away, is that “better”? Would you root for him? If he’d kicked the crap out of two adults instead of some teens, is that “better”? Is beating your wife “less bad” or “more bad” than not paying child support? These sound to me like pointless distinctions, because they nothing more than personal reactions to “bad” behavior. But you seem to be speaking from a position of moral authority, and I don’t know from what you could derive that authority.

Has Matt Bush struggled to meet his obligations as a human being (let alone ball player) because he is dependent on a substance? Is/was he willing to put in the work to be rehabilitated into the world that we build together and share? If yes, what does the rest matter?

I say this as a coach and as a teacher, as a person who has been in and out of recovery myself, as the adult child and grandchild of addicts and their codependents, as a substance abuse counselor and mental health professional, as an overdose survivor, and yes, as a baseball fan. I may have a somewhat skewed perspective because the kids I have worked with have been both the perpetrators of and victims of things so much worse that DUIs (including ones that result in deaths) that it’s hard for me to care about the details.

Does Matt Bush pose a challenge to our individual rooting interests? Yes, of course he does. But set your own boundaries about PEDs, domestic violence, drugs, attitude, performance, or even “playing the right way.” It’s absolutely your right as a fan. But don’t mistakenly frame your opinion about a behavior as a fact.

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago
Reply to  scotman144

I couldn’t care less about anyone’s personal issues. I am in the minority I believe, but I just don’t care. If he doesn’t get arrested, then we don’t even know about it. The idea that we know what the athletes are and aren’t is just an illusion. If you are a big enough star, maybe it all just goes away? I am not a big fan of judging anyone based on their worst moment or judgement based on what someone was… I don’t know what he is other than a baseball player and I don’t really care much either. I find it strange how judgmental people are in this era of tolerance.

I am not trying to convince anyone of anything, I could just imagine making a horrible mistake and never being given the opportunity to move past it. He was held accountable, it is tough that there are a lot of people that will never give him the opportunity to be a better man – possibly well-deservedly so. Again, I don’t know who he really is, or care too much.

tung_twista
7 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Well with Matt Bush, it wasn’t a single incident, but rather a series of really bad incidents culminating in a terrible incident.
Once it becomes a habit, it is no longer a mistake, is it?

Also there is a line to be drawn between Josh Hamilton/Jung Ho Kang and Matt Bush.
Hamilton had his own personal issues, but as far as I know, hurt himself mostly.
Jung Ho Kang had his troubles with DUI but at least did not flee the scene after hitting and injuring a human being.

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Like I said, I don’t know much about these dudes – don’t care much either. My opinion doesn’t make much difference regardless of what they are.

sadtrombonemember
7 years ago
Reply to  scotman144

Matt Bush did a truly horrible thing, definitely worse than a PED offender. But I think I would understand giving the guy a second chance if he really seemed remorseful and had done his time. He had serious drug problems, and while that’s not an excuse for his actions I do think there is some chance for redemption. I feel the same way about PED offenders, although it’s pretty clear taking PEDs is nowhere near as terrible as running over someone’s head.

But there are some truly horrible people in the history of major league baseball. Roger Clemens took PEDs, but I’m mostly mad that he tried to ruin people’s lives who blew the whistle. Chuck Knoblauch was a serial abuser. Barry Bonds did both of those things. There is a special place in hell for Milton Bradley, and I would be infuriated if my team signed Aroldis Chapman. These are truly terrible people who have never even pretended to express remorse; this isn’t like Michael Vick, who might have been acting but really did “seem” like he was sorry. I think it’s perfectly reasonable to hold teams accountable for signing players who are very clearly bad people. I just don’t necessarily think Matt Bush belongs in that class.

dl80
7 years ago
Reply to  scotman144

I would argue that Matt Bush is basically incorrigible:

“His first arrest came just two weeks after the draft, for getting drunk and biting a bouncer at a nightclub. In the years that followed, he got into trouble three times for driving drunk, a second time for fighting in a bar and, three times within a four-month span in 2009: once for assaulting high school students and screaming “I’m Matt f—ing Bush!”; once for throwing a baseball at a woman who had allegedly drawn on his face when he was passed out at a party; and once for swinging his belt at a moving car.”

http://www.espn.co.uk/mlb/story/_/id/15147918/the-story-texas-rangers-prospect-matt-bush-rediscovery-unlikely-comeback

For those keeping track, that’s 3 DUIs (before the one that landed him in jail) and five assaults. I can’t let someone get away with just blaming that all on alcohol.

He was a bad person, and whether he still is or not, that’s far too many chances for me to be happy with him getting paid millions. I’d be more ok with it if he had to give 75% of his salary every year to the victims or a charity.