Colorado Rockies Top 43 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Colorado Rockies. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. This is the fifth year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but we use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
Editor’s Note: Kamuel Villar (no. 43) was added to this list following his signing as part of the 2025 international amateur class.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chase Dollander | 23.3 | AA | SP | 2026 | 55 |
| 2 | Charlie Condon | 21.8 | A+ | 3B | 2027 | 45+ |
| 3 | Brody Brecht | 22.4 | R | SP | 2027 | 45+ |
| 4 | Adael Amador | 21.8 | MLB | 2B | 2025 | 45 |
| 5 | Yanquiel Fernandez | 22.1 | AAA | RF | 2025 | 45 |
| 6 | Carson Palmquist | 24.3 | AAA | SP | 2026 | 45 |
| 7 | Gabriel Hughes | 23.5 | AA | SP | 2026 | 45 |
| 8 | Jordy Vargas | 21.2 | A | SP | 2027 | 45 |
| 9 | Sterlin Thompson | 23.6 | AA | LF | 2026 | 45 |
| 10 | Robert Calaz | 19.2 | A | RF | 2029 | 40+ |
| 11 | Luis Peralta | 24.1 | MLB | SIRP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 12 | Zach Agnos | 24.5 | AA | MIRP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 13 | Seth Halvorsen | 25.0 | MLB | SIRP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 14 | Juan Mejia | 24.6 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 15 | Welinton Herrera | 20.8 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 40+ |
| 16 | Zac Veen | 23.1 | AAA | RF | 2025 | 40+ |
| 17 | Cole Carrigg | 22.7 | A+ | CF | 2027 | 40+ |
| 18 | Kelvin Hidalgo | 19.9 | A | SS | 2029 | 40+ |
| 19 | Ashly Andujar | 17.5 | R | SS | 2030 | 40+ |
| 20 | Drew Romo | 23.4 | MLB | C | 2025 | 40 |
| 21 | Jaden Hill | 25.1 | MLB | SIRP | 2025 | 40 |
| 22 | Andy Perez | 20.7 | A+ | SS | 2028 | 40 |
| 23 | Jared Thomas | 21.6 | A | LF | 2027 | 40 |
| 24 | Bradley Blalock | 24.1 | MLB | MIRP | 2025 | 40 |
| 25 | Sean Sullivan | 22.5 | AA | MIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 26 | Jack Mahoney | 23.5 | A+ | SP | 2026 | 40 |
| 27 | Julio Carreras | 25.1 | AAA | SS | 2025 | 40 |
| 28 | Yeiker Reyes | 19.3 | R | CF | 2028 | 40 |
| 29 | Roynier Hernandez | 20.2 | R | 3B | 2028 | 40 |
| 30 | Yujanyer Herrera | 21.5 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 31 | Luichi Casilla | 20.1 | R | SIRP | 2028 | 40 |
| 32 | Greg Jones | 26.9 | MLB | CF | 2025 | 35+ |
| 33 | Benny Montgomery | 22.4 | AA | CF | 2025 | 35+ |
| 34 | Michael Prosecky | 23.9 | A+ | SP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 35 | Isaiah Coupet | 22.4 | A | MIRP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 36 | Ryan Ritter | 24.2 | AA | SS | 2027 | 35+ |
| 37 | Braylen Wimmer | 24.1 | A | SS | 2028 | 35+ |
| 38 | Kyle Karros | 22.5 | A+ | 3B | 2027 | 35+ |
| 39 | Derek Bernard | 19.5 | R | LF | 2028 | 35+ |
| 40 | Lebarron Johnson Jr. | 22.6 | R | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 41 | Sandy Ozuna | 18.7 | R | SP | 2029 | 35+ |
| 42 | Gregory Sanchez | 18.1 | R | SP | 2030 | 35+ |
| 43 | Kamuel Villar | 17.4 | R | SS | 2031 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Spot Starters
Blake Adams, RHP
Victor Juarez, RHP
Alberto Pacheco, LHP
Adams, 24, is a strike-throwing starter with a vertical fastball/curveball combo. He reached Double-A in 2024 and walked just 4.9% of his opponents in 127 innings. Juarez, 21, is an undersized Mexican pitchability righty who worked an efficient 111 innings at High-A in 2024, mostly thanks to a deep coffer of average secondary pitches. Pacheco, 22, is a Dominican left-handed version who worked 120.2 innings mostly at Low-A.
Fringe Relievers
Jeff Criswell, RHP
McCade Brown, RHP
Jackson Cox, RHP
Brayan Castillo, RHP
Cade Denton, RHP
Criswell appeared to alter his delivery in 2024 and now has a lower, three-quarters slot. It helped his fastball miss more bats, but it also seemed to make it more vulnerable to big damage. Brown is a 6-foot-6 dev project who pitched just 6.2 innings as an underclassman at Indiana and missed most of 2023 and 2024 recovering from TJ. When he returned late last season, his release was inconsistent. He could be a standard mid-90s/slider middle reliever, but he needs to find a little more velo and consistent control. Cox, who signed for $1.85 million out of high school in 2022, was another of Colorado’s many TJ rehabbers in 2024. He has a great curveball, but his below-average fastball velocity (he was 92-94 again during instructs), movement, and vulnerable plane aren’t a great fit with that curve. He’s pitched just 31 affiliated innings and struggled with control during those. Castillo is a 24-year-old righty with a great slider who has struggled to find any sort of mechanical consistency. Denton was a dominant low-slot reliever at Oral Roberts whose fastball lost two ticks and sat 92 in 2024. At 93-96 with uphill angle and tail, he looks like a nasty righty specialist; at 90-94, he looks like a fringe prospect.
Catching Depth
Cole Messina, C
Braxton Fulford, C
Ronaiker Palma, C
Messina got a shade over $1 million as Colorado’s third rounder in 2024. He has above-average power, but I was bearish on his hit tool and defensive fit prior to the draft, and Messina didn’t do anything in pro ball to dissuade me from that notion. Fulford is a below-average defensive backstop and contact hitter with average power. The 26-year-old might be a third catcher. Palma is a wee 5-foot-9 catcher with a super quick release and incredibly consistent accuracy. He’s hosed 43% of would-be basestealers as a pro, but he’s too small to make any kind of offensive impact.
Funky Lefties
Mason Albright, LHP
Evan Justice, LHP
Evan Shawver, LHP
Carson Skipper, LHP
Albright was a 2021 Angels draft pick out of high school and was traded to Colorado in one of the 2023 Last Ohtani Gasp deadline deals, this one for Randal Grichuk. He’s pitched as a starter up through Double-A, but his stuff is more akin to the T.J. McFarland type of second lefty. Justice is a nasty low-slot lefty with 20 control. He walked more than a batter per inning at Triple-A in 2024 but has a pretty tough tailing fastball/slider combo. Shawver is a little lefty with an uphill fastball that sits just about 91. He’s had upper-level success, but he lacks overt big league stuff. Skipper has a cartoonish over-the-top delivery that enables his 88-mph fastball to sneak past hitters at a surprising rate. The 2022 11th rounder was dominant as a reliever at Spokane in 2024.
Projection Bats
Eriel Dihigo, 3B
Aldalay Kolokie, OF
Wilder Dalis, SS
Cristian Arguelles, CF
Dyan Jorge, 2B
Dihigo is the most projectable Rockies DSL hitter from 2024 (non-Andujar edition). The 18-year-old Cuban slashed .306/.413/.394 and has a ton of room on his frame for strength. Kolokie, now 20, had the best spreadsheet performance among Rocks DSL batters in terms of hard-hit rate and contact, but he isn’t that toolsy. Dalis is a medium-framed 18-year-old Venezuelan infielder who had a good second year in the DSL, where he was among the team’s leaders in hard-hit rate. Arguelles is a small center fielder with bat-to-ball skills. Jorge was a multi-million dollar signee out of Cuba with a lanky, prototypical build and one of the weirder statistical profiles in the org. He makes a lot of in-zone contact but nothing else; his swing isn’t really functional and only allows him to contact the ball in a narrow window of the zone.
Lacking Plate Discipline
Juan Guerrero, LF
Warming Bernabel, 3B
Guerrero is a skinny 23-year-old Dominican outfielder with a .287/.343/.411 career line through Double-A and a 7% career walk rate. He has an aesthetically pleasing opposite field approach to contact and can move the barrel around the zone, but he lacks the pop of a left fielder and he is apt to chase a lot. The sweet-swinging Bernabel’s lack of plate discipline was exposed as he climbed the minors. He was removed from Colorado’s 40-man before last season, then had a bad year at Hartford.
Older Sleepers
Aidan Longwell, 1B
Caleb Hobson, OF
Longwell was 2023 Day Three pick out of Kent State who had a nice first full pro season at Fresno. He has deft hands and feel for oppo contact, but his power is a couple grades below what is typical for a first baseman. Hobson is a speedy $150,000 13th rounder out of Tennessee-Martin who stole 46 bases and played good outfield defense in 2024.
System Overview
This is a talented but imbalanced system, deep on impact pitchers, though many of them are likely relievers. Charlie Condon’s issues in pro ball were too severe to ignore, which leaves Chase Dollander as the club’s only Top 100 prospect. There are lots of nice part-time players here, but not the franchise-altering everyday guys the Rockies need to tilt with their division foes. The Rockies are the Derek Watt of the NL West — every other org is either a financial powerhouse, has demonstrated a keen ability to pick and develop guys that will help them compete, or both. This is arguably the most difficult division basement to crawl out of, and the Rockies have been down there for a while.
To do it, they’re going to need high-end talent. The very early returns from Condon are bad and suggest he ain’t that. Colorado’s next bite at the apple will be this year’s draft, in which the team picks fourth. I think there’s a good chance Ethan Holliday will be on the board when they pick, and the specter of his father Matt, who was an incredible hitter and Rockie, has added to speculation that Ethan would be an exciting and sentimental fit, and provide the sort of ceiling the Rockies need. I’ve mentioned this in chats and on podcasts, but I don’t think that’s true. Holliday is more famous than obviously great, and he hasn’t hit enough against his elite peers to merit picking at the top of a draft. It’s possible there will be four guys who are collectively viewed as franchise-altering players by the time the draft rolls around, but right now that’s not the case, and the Rockies are more likely to wind up with a solid player at four than a star.
The 2025 season will be about handing reps to the players who need them to develop. Much like Oakland did with the likes of Lawrence Butler and Darell Hernaiz, the Rockies have time to let their risky young players develop at the big league level. This paid dividends with Brenton Doyle in 2024 and could benefit any of the 2025 ETA prospects above, as well as Jordan Beck (I’m a skeptic) and Hunter Goodman (I’m an enthusiast), who aren’t rookies anymore. A feisty young bullpen is a great way to sneak up on people because it can help a team overperform in one-run games, and the Rockies certainly have one of those cooking in the upper reaches of their system. Realistically, though, they are going to be a distant fourth or fifth in the NL West again, and trade the likes of Germán Márquez (if he can show he’s healthy — he’s in his contract year) and other veterans who likely won’t be around for the next good Colorado squad.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Condon’s writeup perfectly illustrates exactly why I was out on him during the draft. The potential is there, but every upside he’s got has a flag of some sort attached. He’s a boom-or-bust profile to me. If he can develop into an everyday corner outfielder defensively, he’ll likely be a lock to stick at the MLB level, though how effective he’ll be will likely vary from year-to-year. Adam Duvall is the type of profile I’d expect, maybe a touch better given the ceiling for his raw power is so high. But that’s still a guy who can give you 3 WAR or 0 WAR in any given year.
Adam Dunn or a touch better seems like the ceiling based on this write up. Dunn had 8 seasons of 38+ HRs. If he’s Dunn but with more power we’re going to see several 50+ HR seasons in Colorado which would be super fun to watch.
Dunn was a lefty, and also had elite plate discipline. That’s a bit much. Maybe as an absolute ceiling you can get Dunn offensively.
There is no Dunn with more power. Dunn was 80 grade power.
I think I am higher than Eric here. I think we should see what he does this year before declaring him a 30 hit tool from here on out. A 50 hit tool does seem out of reach, but I don’t know that a 40 hit tool is yet.
Adam Duvall is an interesting comp. Plus defense in a corner, lots of homers, low BABIP. I think I buy it. Adolis Garcia is kind of like that too.
I think that offensively there’s some Khris Davis / Brent Rooker / Teoscar Hernandez / Tyler O’Neill / Mitch Haniger here, so if you’re feeling really optimistic you could dream on good outfield defense with a guy who smacks a lot of homers. Like maybe Yoenis Cespedes if everything clicks, which is probably the 95th percentile guy.
Overall I think that Condon was a very worthwhile pick. At the time there were prospects on the board that I liked as much as him (Jac being the big one) grabbing a guy who has 70 raw, could play a plus outfield, and who tore up the SEC made a ton of sense for them. There’s going to be a rush for people to bash the Rockies for this pick if he busts but if so I am going to ask for some receipts because he seemed totally reasonable to grab at the time.
I don’t think Brent Rooker or Teoscar are good comps. They make a lot of contact relative to their power, upper 70s to low 80s% z-Contact. I don’t think Condon has quite that much contact upside. His swing is really grooved. He’s got a red zone and then dead zones elsewise. Healthy Haniger and his 80-85% z-Contact is well out of reach.
I can see Khris Davis offensively, basically souped-up Duvall. If he can get to that total offensive value with average or better cOF defense, that’s a 4-WAR player with upside. His frame works both for and against him, in that he’s got massive strides to cover ground and supremely easy power, but his swing-and-miss is a part of his game to its core and minimal agility is a given.
I think his plate and swing discipline will drive his profile. If he can get a handle on his chase rates and make good swing decisions, he’s got a good future. If he can’t, he will be inconsistent.
There are a shocking number of position player prospects whose hit tool grade is “No”
I think Condon could have a 40 hit tool, but Yanquiel Fernandez’s hit tool is super scary to me. I don’t see how he gets higher than a 30 hit tool, so it’s the same amount of future hit tool risk for me.
And Calaz and Hidalgo also have super scary hit tools, to the point where even a 40+ grade seems optimistic.
And that’s before we get to Greg Jones and Benny Montgomery, who are in pinch runner / defensive replacement territory.
The guy I’m higher on is the guy who struck out 31% of the time in his cup of coffee, like is this team even scouting for hit tool or what.
It’s kind of weird, given that guys like Amador, Andujar, Romo, Thompson, and the recently graduated Tovar are also big parts of the system. It almost seems like they’re just trying to see what sticks at Coors.
The Rockies are so poorly run that I’m legitimately wondering if this is because they’re bad at drafting, bad at developing, or are doing this intentionally because of the offensive environment in Denver (the ultimate big brain long-term plan). And when I think about it I come to the conclusion that it’s definitely all three.
“He can only hit hanging breaking balls? Well, those are the ONLY breaking balls at Coors!!”
I wonder if the Coors effect has anything to do with the Rockies not caring so much about hit tool. if the opposing pitching staff’s stuff plays down at Coors, a poor hit tool may play up a bit as a result? especially if the hit tool concerns are linked to struggles against breaking pitches (and not, like, in-zone whiffs against fastballs), which tend to play down at elevation
I think it’s probably that there were several years where they just focused on power and speed. Maybe they knew what a hit tool looked like and didn’t care.
Lately they have been focusing more on college players, at least partly because they are worried about signability. But even there they seem to find the guys with power. Hunter Goodman is an extreme example but gives you a sense, I think, of what they want.
I see the point about breaking pitches playing down at Coors, so the Rockies might focus more on power.
But my approach is from the other direction.
If playing in Coors boosts everyone’s power, shouldn’t the Rockies focus on the hit tool over power? Coors can give anyone power, but only if you hit the ball.
Also, it seems nuts to focus on power with weak hit tool, on the basis that Coors mitigates breaking balls, unless you are expecting to play all games at Coors Field.
So the answer is probably just Rockies are mismanaged.
Exactly, that plan is great for 81 games. The other 81 games you’re going to have a terrible offense & win 25-30 of 81 games.
Good luck with that!
CarGo is the only guy off of the top of my head where that particular change of scenery worked. I do think Adell could be another. But yes, get a guy with a plus hit tool and you end up with the best versions of Helton, Walker, Holliday (okay, those are the only 3 plus hit tools I can come up with over the last 20ish years–ouch).
It’s also a matter of hit tool not necessarily translating at Coors either. Remember LeMahieu? He struggled at Coors for years and broke out elsewhere. Plenty of other guys too.
Coors also boosts both hit tool and power. It’s just inconsistent about how and how much.
I can count the amount of relevant prospects AND big leaguers in the Rockies organization who make above average or better swing decisions with the fingers of one hand. This team is a galaxy behind almost every other in terms of scouting for and teaching plate discipline. It’s almost like they actively seek guys who are free-swingers.
There’s a reason they haven’t hit at the big league level in close to a decade and punch out constantly. If you watch any Rockies game, the amount of times you’ll see their hitters whiff horrendously on breaking balls way out of the zone will blow your mind. I suspect that on top of lackluster plate discipline, they scouting and preparation is awful. And I think the manager and his coaching staff have a lot to do with that.
So…you think it’s everything.
Neat.
Assuming you are Mario Delgado Genzor: I remember you were on a podcast last year (maybe SIS?), suggesting the Rockies tackle their pitching dev problem by either/both focusing on guys that don’t lean on pitches that use fluid dynamics for effect (for whatever reason, splitters are the pitch I recall you saying) or else just improving pitching all around because these guys still need to pitch 81 games outside of Coors.
What would your blueprint for tackling their hitting problems be? Other than filtering draft prospects by two-strike chase.
On Condon, it says “I thought he looked surprisingly skillful in center field at Georgia, though he’s a 40-grade runner,” but the table says his run grade is 50/50. Typo?
Indeed – table should be updated now, with his tool grades on The Board to follow. Thanks for spotting that!
I definitely higher on Dollander too. I don’t think he’s a super-elite pitching prospect like Skenes, Painter, Mackenzie Gore, and Eury Perez were, but I have a hard time imagining that there are more than three pitching prospects right now that I would take over him.
I’d take Bubba Chandler for sure over him, and probably Andrew Painter, and maybe Jackson Jobe or Noah Schultz, who I like but maybe not as much as others. But Dollander isn’t a 60 I don’t know that there are going to be many 60s on the pitching side this year. There have been two a year for a while now, and about five a year if you go back to 2017-2021. I imagine this year it will be Jobe and Chandler, but Dollander has all the “stuff” you look for in a front line starter and he’s performed great so far.
I’d probably put Dollander a full grade higher than Caden Dana, although that may be that I’m down on Dana.
I’m super interested in how the pitching grades shake out. Command guys seemed to play up big this year, while stuff guys tailed off a bit.
Reading my EL tea leaves gives me the suspicion that the only possible 60s this year are Painter (was already a 60 and seemed fine enough in the fall league returning from injury to not dock him) and Chandler (threw over 100 innings in the upper minors with good results from a K and BB% standpoint). None of the other 55s can claim either of those things and nobody from the 50s strikes me as someone moving toward the Top 10 overall at this point.
I’d wager Dollander lost consideration for a 60 due to the regression of his stuff at the end of the season and the fact that most of his season was in high A+. I think if he doesn’t cross the rookie threshhold next season he’d be at the top of the list to get 60’d along with Schultz. Burns, Smith and Rosario in the window looking in depending on how agressively they’re moved.
Oh yeah, Painter almost certainly. Not sure about whether he’ll go with Chandler, Jobe, or neither.
Jobe’s stuff is certainly elite, and most prospect writers seem to have him as number 1, but he’s had durability issues. For Chandler, EL loves former two-way / two-sport athletes and might see Chandler as having more left in the development tank.
Me, I know Jobe’s stuff is nastier but I’m not sure what else Chandler could do to impress us at this point.
160 inning… workhorse? I don’t think I’m going to get used to this.
For whatever it is or isn’t worth, the number of qualified starters jumped back up to pre-pandemic levels in 2024…
2010: 92
2011: 94
2012: 88
2013: 81
2014: 88
2015: 78
2016: 74
2017: 58
2018: 58
2019: 61
2021: 39
2022: 45
2023: 44
2024: 58
32 starts x 5 innings =160.
So, basically a 5 and dive guy is a workhorse now..sigh.