Colorado Rockies Top 44 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Colorado Rockies. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. This is the sixth year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but we use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ethan Holliday | 19.1 | A | 3B | 2029 | 50 |
| 2 | Charlie Condon | 23.0 | AAA | LF | 2026 | 50 |
| 3 | Roldy Brito | 19.0 | A | CF | 2028 | 50 |
| 4 | Wilder Dalis | 19.7 | A | 2B | 2028 | 45+ |
| 5 | McCade Brown | 25.9 | MLB | SP | 2026 | 45 |
| 6 | Angel Jimenez | 22.7 | A | SP | 2029 | 45 |
| 7 | Cole Carrigg | 23.9 | AAA | CF | 2027 | 40+ |
| 8 | Jared Thomas | 22.7 | AA | LF | 2027 | 40+ |
| 9 | Roc Riggio | 23.8 | AA | 2B | 2026 | 40+ |
| 10 | Zac Veen | 24.3 | MLB | RF | 2026 | 40+ |
| 11 | Andy Perez | 21.8 | A+ | SS | 2027 | 40+ |
| 12 | Sterlin Thompson | 24.8 | AAA | LF | 2026 | 40+ |
| 13 | Sebastian Blanco | 18.2 | R | SS | 2029 | 40+ |
| 14 | Ashly Andujar | 18.7 | R | SS | 2030 | 40+ |
| 15 | Welinton Herrera | 22.0 | AAA | SIRP | 2026 | 40+ |
| 16 | Derek Bernard | 20.6 | A | RF | 2028 | 40+ |
| 17 | Marcos Herrera | 21.5 | A | SIRP | 2028 | 40 |
| 18 | Brody Brecht | 23.5 | A | SIRP | 2027 | 40 |
| 19 | Eiberson Castellano | 24.9 | AA | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 20 | Jackson Cox | 22.5 | A | SP | 2028 | 40 |
| 21 | Tyler Hampu | 23.7 | A | SIRP | 2028 | 40 |
| 22 | Konner Eaton | 23.3 | AA | MIRP | 2027 | 40 |
| 23 | Griffin Herring | 22.9 | A+ | SP | 2028 | 40 |
| 24 | Gabriel Hughes | 24.6 | AAA | SP | 2026 | 40 |
| 25 | TJ Rumfield | 25.9 | MLB | 1B | 2026 | 40 |
| 26 | Jack Mahoney | 24.6 | AA | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 27 | JB Middleton | 22.4 | R | MIRP | 2028 | 40 |
| 28 | Sean Sullivan | 23.7 | AA | MIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 29 | Cristian Arguelles | 18.8 | R | CF | 2029 | 35+ |
| 30 | Yeremmy Cabeza | 22.1 | R | SP | 2029 | 35+ |
| 31 | Robert Calaz | 20.4 | A | RF | 2029 | 35+ |
| 32 | Max Belyeu | 22.3 | A+ | RF | 2029 | 35+ |
| 33 | Ethan Hedges | 22.2 | A+ | 3B | 2028 | 35+ |
| 34 | Roynier Hernandez | 21.3 | A | 2B | 2028 | 35+ |
| 35 | Michael Prosecky | 25.1 | AA | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 36 | Ben Shields | 27.2 | AAA | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 37 | Braylen Wimmer | 25.3 | AA | SS | 2027 | 35+ |
| 38 | Austin Smith | 26.8 | AA | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 39 | Blaine Crim | 28.8 | MLB | 1B | 2026 | 35+ |
| 40 | Yujanyer Herrera | 22.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 41 | Carson Palmquist | 25.5 | MLB | MIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 42 | Jordy Vargas | 22.4 | A+ | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 43 | RJ Petit | 26.5 | AAA | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 44 | Richard De Los Santos | 16.9 | R | 3B | 2032 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Complex Guys
Eriel Dihigo, 3B
Kamuel Villar, INF
Ismael Contreras, RHP
Andres Herrera, RHP
Dihigo got half a million dollars in the 2024 international class. After a strong showing in the DSL that year, he repeated the level last season and was again productive. While he still has a lot of projection ahead, he’s lean and without much power for a third baseman, and even though it’s early days, he has the look of a tweener. Villar is a lefty-hitting infielder who is at least as likely to end up at second or third base as he is shortstop. He is fairly projectable and already has some verve and authority in his wrists, but it’s a tweener’s collection of tools unless he gets to more power than I’m expecting. Contreras is one of the harder-throwing pitchers in the 2026 international class and also one of the youngest. He has touched 94 and has an okay slider, which was enough for him to get $700,000 to sign with the Rockies. One more Herrera for the road. Andres throws 99, but was wild in the DSL.
Reliever Mountain
Riley Kelly, RHP
Seth Clausen, RHP
Antoine Jean, LHP
Fidel Ulloa, RHP
Cade Denton, RHP
Alberto Pacheco, LHP
Hunter Mann, RHP
Mason Albright, LHP
Carson Skipper, LHP
Braxton Hyde, RHP
Evan Justice, LHP
Kelly was Colorado’s fourth-rounder last year. He has plus-plus feel for spin and touches the mid-90s. A history of high walk rates have him down here for now, but that could change. Colorado tabbed Clausen in the 16th round last year. He touches 97 and flashes a plus curve and an above-average split, but he had all kinds of trouble hitting the box in college. His delivery is high-effort, but not so messy to think that it can’t better. If it does, he’ll move onto the main section. The left-handed Jean is a native of Montreal. He starred out of the bullpen at the University of Houston and was popped in the seventh round last year. He sits in the low 90s and throws strikes with a bevy of breaking balls, the hardest of which flashes above-average; he could be a middle reliever. Ulloa has unusually good command for a draft guy plugged straight into a relief role. It’s hard for 95-and-a-slider righties to profile these days, even those with above-average breakers that take a late right turn on their way to the plate. An extra tick or two would go a long way here. Denton is a low-slot sinker-slider-change reliever. His stuff has worked thus far, but fringy arm strength and a slower arm on spin suggest an up-down ceiling.
Pacheco’s easy operation limits his deception, which isn’t ideal for a guy who wants to lean on his changeup. Still, he’s a lefty who has touched 96 out of the rotation, and it’s worth seeing if a little more intensity in short bursts changes the equation. Mann stands 6-foot-7 and isn’t especially coordinated, but he touches 98, flashes two average secondaries, and missed bats at High-A. He’s wild, but maybe it’ll click someday. Albright is a funky lefty with a good breaking ball and below-average arm strength. He took a battering as a starter in the PCL last year, and his future is almost certainly in relief. Skipper got to suit up for Team USA during the club’s WBC prep, and even got into a game in relief of Clayton Kershaw, which must have been pretty cool. He immediately allowed a homer to Kyle Karros, which was presumably less cool. He’s deceptive, with a very vertical arm slot, and has reached Triple-A while getting away with throwing 88 with fringy stuff. Hyde hasn’t missed bats as a starter in High-A, but he has above-average arm strength and it’s worth seeing if he’s more effective in shorter stints. Justice is a nasty low-slot lefty with 20 control.
Upper-Level Depth
Cole Messina, C
Bryant Betancourt, C
Victor Juarez, RHP
Jose Torres, SS
Messina is making a lot of contact with below-average bat speed, a tightrope that will narrow further at every level. He can really throw, and caught 40% of base stealers last year. Those skills together give him the tool set of a club’s third or fourth catcher. Betancourt is a six months younger and has a similar profile. The undersized Juarez has long had lovely body control and plus command. He has a plus change and three secondaries that flash at least average, but a 30 fastball is a crusher here. He’s a depth length option. At short, Torres’ internal clock is well calibrated; at the plate, his timing is not.
Clipped Wings
Gregory Sanchez, RHP
Sandy Ozuna, RHP
Luichi Casilla, LHP
Brayan Castillo, RHP
Lebarron Johnson Jr., RHP
Isaiah Coupet, LHP
All of these guys would’ve been in contention for the main section had they not missed substantial time in 2025. Sanchez was Colorado’s hardest-throwing DSL pitcher in 2024, a big-framed, high-waisted, long-armed 6-foot-4 righty who worked in the mid-90s with sink and tail. He made 13 starts and threw just 33.1 innings that year, and appeared in only two games last season while battling shoulder problems. He has the highest upside of the group, but between the light workload and the injury, we want to see how he looks on the field before evaluating further. Ozuna had among the best stuff of Colorado’s complex-level group in 2024, but he missed time with an undisclosed injury and his arm strength was way down when he did get on the field. His ultra-long, inconsistent arm action already created a lot of relief risk. Casilla flashed big stuff and was up to 97 amidst a rough statistical spin through the ACL in 2024. He had Tommy John last spring, and we’ll see how everything looks when he’s back on the field. Castillo has plus-plus arm strength but round-down shape and pitchability. He’s on the 60-day IL with a lat injury. Johnson missed the end of 2025 with right hip inflammation. At his best, he’s got an above-average fastball and a plus slider; he’s wild enough that he’s almost certainly a reliever. Coupet has missed a lot of time lately with various elbow maladies. He could be a lefty middle reliever.
More Bats
Aidan Longwell, 1B
Kelvin Hidalgo, 3B
Blake Wright, INF
Yeiker Reyes, CF
Cameron Nelson, CF
Benny Montgomery, OF
Dyan Jorge, SS
Longwell has an average hit tool with a smartly aggressive approach. The problem is he has 40 power and has mostly been limited to first base. He isn’t a bad athlete and he has enough speed to at least give a corner spot the old college try. Hidalgo has a plus arm and could grow into average power or a tick more. He’s playing a mix of short and third, and likely fits best at the latter. He’s pretty raw in all facets, and he posted a sub-70% contact rate at Fresno with mistake-laden defense and baserunning. Wright is a utility infielder who makes contact and plays hard; it would help a lot if he could reliably fill in at short. Reyes has a slappy swing, which makes his proclivity for swing-and-miss untenable. He’s a plus runner who could be good in center, so there’s a path to contributing if he can find a way to make more contact. He really could have used short-season ball.
There’s slash-and-dash, and there’s Nelson, who almost literally never pulled the ball as a junior in college. He’s very fast and can play center, but there’s only so much damage you can do hitting like this. I swooned for the ultra loose Montgomery in his early pro days, but injuries have derailed his career, as gobs of missed time robbed him of valuable opportunities to turn tools into skills and production. It looks like Eric’s long-standing assessment that the swing wasn’t going to work will prove correct, as it remains unworkably long and he’s whiffing far too much to profile in his current form. He’s an athletic change-of-scenery candidate. Sometimes thin players are projectable, and sometimes they’re just narrow. Jorge, it seems, is in the latter camp; he looks like an org guy.
System Overview
Perhaps this reads a little rosier than you anticipated. But say what you will about the rest of the operation, Colorado’s amateur scouting and international groups generally haven’t been the source of the team’s problems. Throughout my time evaluating this system, the club’s lower-level rosters have consistently been interesting on both sides of the ball. There were enough early-round reaches in recent years — Gabriel Hughes and Benny Montgomery come to mind — to say that the amateur apparatus probably wasn’t quite best in class, but it’s been more than good enough to give the Rockies a fighting chance.
The wheels tend to fall off later. Undersized players tend not to get stronger. Pitchers break all the time and, as you read about several times above, they don’t always return in top form. Hitters with messy swings fall behind. Guys with bad approaches keep on hacking. Pitchers don’t often reliably sharpen their breaking stuff or enhance their fastball shapes. Colorado has developed several good defensive catchers, particularly when Jerry Weinstein was involved, but overall this has been the last place you’d want to send a guy to make adjustments.
An annoying pattern emerges when evaluating the Rockies. Because they scout well but develop poorly, reports tend to be inflated in retrospect. This isn’t just my opinion, as plenty of scouts who have covered the org in recent years share the same view, if not quite my level of exasperation. Baffling personnel decisions contribute as well. Why was Adael Amador given a two-level bump right at the exact second he was exiting the worst slump of his life? And why hasn’t he had any run since that predictable failure? Maybe Yanquiel Fernández is your flavor of prospect, maybe he’s not, but how can a team in Colorado’s position give up on a talented 22-year-old like that after only 147 big league plate appearances?
In a way, the best players to come out the other side, like Hunter Goodman and Ezequiel Tovar, make for some of the most damning case studies of all. For all their time in the minors, the system’s biggest successes have arrived in Denver as highly flawed players with little discernible softening to their roughest edges. The ones who make it seem to survive more on talent and guts than from major changes they made along the way.
The $64,000 question is how different the Rockies will look under new management. The Rockies have been almost painfully behind the times in recent years, and I was wondering if a couple trips through the backfields this spring would reveal an entirely different vibe. I can’t say that it did. I don’t want to panic anybody or draw strong conclusions: The scale of what’s needed to turn the franchise around might require a slow approach, there are plenty of new people in positions of leadership, I have no interest in calling for anyone’s job, and it’s entirely possible that the development group has already made significant adjustments that are only really apparent behind closed doors. Still, if you were looking for manifestly obvious signs that there’s a new sheriff in town, akin to some of the observations that came out of Washington’s camp this spring, I didn’t find them.
Brendan covers prospects and the minor leagues for FanGraphs. Previously he worked as a Pro Scout for the Pittsburgh Pirates.
I laughed about how you explained the pronunciation of Petit. Because you could have gone with “pet it, like a dog,” instead of “petite” like a small person. But, being that it’s just baseball sickos reading 40+ names deep into the Rockies prospect list, I of course knew exactly what you meant between the difference in pronunciation between Andy and Yusmeiro’s names
I had to go back and check to see what I wrote last year because I remember being shocked at how bad the hit tools were, and this year it seems better.
Update on those guys I flagged last year:
Yanquiel Fernandez: Previously FV45. DFA’d by the Rockies and then the Yankees, now hanging out in the Yankees system.
Robert Calaz: Previously FV40+. Currently and FV35+. Current hit tool listed as 20.
Kevin Hidalgo: Previously FV40+. Currently on the “other guys” section. Terrible contact numbers in low minors.
Benny Montgomery: Previously FV35+. Currently on the “other guys” section. Looks like he’s gone from defensive replacement / pinch-runner to org guy.
Others:
Zac Veen also looks like he’s trying to turn his life around, who knows if that means he’s going to make contact now.
I think Condon is appropriately graded now, especially if he returns to the corner outfield.
The only guy with a terrifying hit tool they seem to have added since last year’s list is Ethan Holliday. Currently has a “No” grade for hit tool, but he is also very young. Trying to think of someone who couldn’t make contact at all at age 19 who turned out well. I’m sure there is one.
For the Rockies, focusing so much on raw power to the detriment of hit feels odd to me. Instead they really should focus on the hit tool for their stadium. As long as you put the ball in play there is a good chance for an extra base hit with the OF size or a HR. But you can’t hit HRs whether playing in Seattle or Colorado if you swing and miss all the time.
The type of players I am going after if I am COL are Wetherholt and McGonigle. Fantastic hit tools whose game power will play up due to context skills. Wetherholt in particular I think would fit very well in COL with his spray approach and he would be looking at a lot of XBHs with the OF size.
I think the Rockies biggest problem is that they seem to be trying to “fix their problems” rather than looking for talent. That they wanted a specific type of player to fill a hole in their system rather than just getting the best player and figuring it out later. In that respect going for Condon and Holliday is sort of refreshing because they were arguably the top player on the board at that point.
Of course it feels like they just missed in 2024. It’s funny because the Guardians, Rockies, and White Sox all got a decent FV50 prospect in 2024, but they are likely going to regret passing on Kurtz, Wetherholt, and Griffin. Maybe Jac and Rainer too.
And in 2025, I don’t blame them for skipping the pitchers because pitching is so variable for them anyway. The one guy who made the most sense for them went #1. Probably what they should have done is go underslot, but it doesn’t seem like this is something they have felt comfortable doing for a while now. If they were sticking there it’s not like there was a position player taken right after him that would have made more sense at close to full slot.
I think they have overstrategized this, maybe due to ownership influence, rather than focusing on “what makes for a good position player.”
Rockies have a fun history of getting the 3rd or so overall pick and then the original ‘best bet for #1 overall’ falls to them and they’re kind of forced into it (Holliday, Condon, Jon Gray, Brendan Rodgers )
That’s actually spot on. I remember each of these guys distinctly getting 1:1 consideration. They could all, except Jon Gray, be considered busts.
Jon Gray was arguably the best pick they could have made there. I don’t think there was a player with a better career picked after him until JP Crawford at 16.
Rodgers was a bust but I don’t think that’s something we can blame them for. Pretty much everyone had him above Kyle Tucker, Ian Happ, and Andrew Benintendi.
Likewise, I think most people had Condon ahead of the other guys, even though it looks very much like the wrong move with Konnor Griffin and Nick Kurtz getting picked behind him.
Riley Pint is another one. Although everyone thought the top of that draft was awful, and it was. The first all-star picked in that draft was Cole Ragans at #30.
And it’s not like there were even a lot of useful contributors out there. It was wild, basically every single player picked before Ragans busted. I think the only players who have even been marginally useful at the MLB level have been Eric Lauer, Braxton Garrett, Gavin Lux, and Josh Lowe.
I’m still going to nitpick the process though for Riley Pint. I’m never going to be a fan of drafting a HS pitcher that high. That was a bad draft in general, but you still don’t want to take a HS arm 4th overall.
I understand what you are saying they focus too much on a type and they definitely can go too far with it. I would weigh hit tool higher for them than maybe other orgs slightly although in general I think I value but more than others as low hit tool has such a high variance in outcomes for the overall player.
For the 24 draft, I had Wetherholt 1, Rainier 2, Griffin 3 with Condon around 10 so I don’t think they took BPA. I feel good about those 3 still but I absolutely struck out on Kurtz as I had him in the 20s. I just don’t love Condon due to the lack of hit. Same with Holliday who I had further down the list of BPA as well although my #1 was Arquette.
Trying to think of guys who didn’t make contact at 18/19 and turned out okay. Without doing a lot of research, my 1st thought was Elly, and he did strike out 30% of the time in A ball without walking, but Ethan Holliday made worse contact and doesn’t have the COVID lost year excuse. Unless Holliday makes great strides this year, I think he’s in trouble.
It’s hard to say that a guy jumping from HS to A-ball after a long season and making contact only 60% of the time is disqualifying by itself. It’s mostly that the guy also had huge hit tool risk even before he was drafted and there was a lot of concern whether he could hit even before this.
Before the draft I thought he looked a lot like Pedro Alvarez at the plate. He should be a much better defender but I still think that’s the most likely “good” comp offensively.
Thank you for your insightful comments about the Rockies’ development shortfalls. I get the sense, and I certainly hope, Josh Byrnes has a similar assessment as yours. He is clearly in a position to influence change for the better.
This looks like one of the worst farm systems to me. The rankings as they are here don’t make it look so bad, but I do not like the hit tools of so many of these hitting prospects. A 45 future hit tool for Holliday looks very generous and I see more of a 35 as the max there.
Brito I do like and he is the only guy I would have as a 50 in this farm. Hopefully the new FO leadership doesn’t make baffling decisions with Brito like the prior regime did with many prospects.
Given the lack of mlb talent save for goodman (who I am still not 100% sold on) this is a unimpressive system.
MIL: 309.5
DET: 291
NYM: 277.5
STL: 275
CLE: 268
LAD: 248
SEA: 241.5
CHWS: 197
TOR: 179.5
CIN: 174
AZ: 171
Col: 160
PHI: 158.5
NYY: 142.5
LAA: 121
ATL: 114.5
Hou: 68
Benny Montgomery’s descent down these lists has been tough to watch.