Cubs Promote Kyle Schwarber… For Now
It’s raining prospects. Every time I check Twitter, it seems, I catch wind of yet another player who’s been summoned to the majors. The latest player to get the call is Kyle Schwarber, the power-hitting “catcher” in the Cubs organization. Schwarber made his big-league debut on Tuesday night as a pinch-hitter, and struck out in his lone plate appearance. Last night, he made his first major-league start, serving as the Cubs designated hitter. Schwarber made the most of this opportunity by going 4-for-5 with a triple.
Word from the Cubs is that Schwarber’s promotion is only a temporary one. The Cubs play their next five games in American League ballparks, which means they’ll need a designated hitter. The Cubs would be hard-pressed to find a better designated hitter than Schwarber. Although he lacks a real defensive position, he hit .320/.438/.579 in the minors this year. Schwarber’s 192 wRC+ in Double-A is the highest among qualified minor-league batters.
Since the Cubs took him fourth overall in last year’s amateur draft, Schwarber’s mashed to the tune of .326/.427/.598 and has belted 32 homers in just 136 games. Schwarber’s offensive exploits pre-date his professional career, however. He hit a loud .358/.464/.659 in his junior season at Indiana University. He lead the Big 10 Conference in homers, walks, on-base percentage and slugging percentage. And somehow, in spite of his 40-grade speed, he even managed to tie for the conference lead in triples.
So the man can clearly hit. Although he’s yet to play a single game at the Triple-A level, he’s already done enough in his brief professional career to convince Steamer that he’s ready to contribute in the big leagues. The projection systems — Steamer and ZiPS — project him for a respectable .246/.312/.434 for the remainder of 2015, which works out to a 103 wRC+. Above-average hitters aren’t very easy to find, even if they provide very little by way of defensive value.
I probably don’t need to tell you that KATOH’s all over Schwarber, but I’m going to tell you anyway: my system likes everything about this guy. He hits for absurd power, draws oodles of walks and doesn’t strike out all that often. Statistically speaking, he’s pretty much the full offensive package.
Considering his 2015 numbers, my system projects him for 11.7 WAR through age-28, up from 6.1 WAR after last year. Heading into the year, only five prospects — Joc Pederson, Kris Bryant, Jorge Soler, Addison Russell and Julio Urias — earned a higher projection than Schwarber’s current figure.
A list of comps should help to put some faces on Schwarber’s tremendous offensive upside. Using league-adjusted, regressed stats, along with age, I calculated the Mahalanobis Distance between Schwarber’s performance and every Double-A season since 1990 in which a batter recorded at least 400 plate appearances. Below, you’ll find a list of historical players whose performances were nearest and dearest to Schwarber’s, ranked from most to least similar.
| Rank | Mah Distance | Name | PA thru 28 | WAR thru 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.46 | Lance Berkman | 3,248 | 27.8 |
| 2 | 0.52 | Ozzie Timmons | 399 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 0.80 | Calvin Pickering | 310 | 0.0 |
| 4 | 0.84 | Carlos Pena | 1,925 | 3.3 |
| 5 | 0.94 | Carlos Delgado | 3,430 | 18.8 |
| 6 | 1.02 | Jayson Werth | 1,129 | 7.2 |
| 7 | 1.15 | Stanton Cameron | 0 | 0.0 |
| 8 | 1.17 | Curtis Granderson | 2,896 | 20.1 |
| 9 | 1.18 | Marc Krauss* | 392 | 0.0 |
| 10 | 1.27 | Ben Grieve | 3,718 | 6.7 |
| 11 | 1.29 | Jed Lowrie | 1,307 | 5.9 |
| 12 | 1.40 | Michael Cuddyer | 2,367 | 7.3 |
| 13 | 1.46 | Corey Koskie | 1,631 | 10.7 |
| 14 | 1.48 | Jason Botts | 326 | 0.5 |
| 15 | 1.64 | Morgan Ensberg | 1,057 | 5.3 |
| 16 | 1.65 | Aaron Luna* | 0 | 0.0 |
| 17 | 1.67 | Josh Phelps | 1,333 | 1.8 |
| 18 | 1.67 | Jim Bonnici | 0 | 0.0 |
| 19 | 1.90 | Jon Singleton* | 362 | 0.0 |
| 20 | 1.93 | Chris Duncan | 1,317 | 3.3 |
*Batters who have yet to play their age-28 season.
And here’s a list containing only players who made the majority of their Double-A starts at catcher, which is Schwarber’s primary position. (For now, at least.)
| Rank | Mah Distance | Name | PA thru 28 | WAR thru 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.94 | Carlos Delgado | 3,430 | 18.8 |
| 2 | 1.67 | Josh Phelps | 1,333 | 1.8 |
| 3 | 2.27 | Carlos Santana | 2,761 | 14.7 |
| 4 | 3.30 | Josh Donaldson | 1,691 | 15.3 |
| 5 | 3.42 | Pete LaForest | 121 | 0.0 |
| 6 | 3.49 | Chris Snyder | 1,682 | 4.5 |
| 7 | 3.70 | Michael McKenry | 607 | 1.4 |
| 8 | 3.83 | JD Closser | 508 | 0.0 |
| 9 | 3.98 | Josmil Pinto* | 280 | 0.9 |
| 10 | 4.01 | Jonathan Lucroy | 2,346 | 15.3 |
*Batters who have yet to play their age-28 season.
Both of these lists certainly have their fair share of excellent hitters. Lance Berkman — Schwarber’s top offensive comp — was essentially on the Hall of Fame track for the first half of his career. Carlos Delgado wasn’t too far behind, and like Schwarber, he was primarily a catcher through Double-A. Sure, there’s the occasional Calvin Pickering sprinkled in. But on the whole, Schwarber finds himself among some pretty fine company.
Schwarber may only be in the majors for a few days this time around, but sooner or later, he’ll be back for good. Where he winds up defensively, and how well he’ll be able to fake it at that position, remains to be seen. But, wherever he plays, Schwarber’s almost certainly going to hit. For the next few days, he gives the Cubs a solid designated hitter. But in the long run, he stands a good chance of being a force in the Cubs lineup for years to come. If the stats are any indication, Schwarber’s bat could be pretty special.
Chris works in economic development by day, but spends most of his nights thinking about baseball. He writes for Pinstripe Pundits, FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. He's also on the twitter machine: @_chris_mitchell None of the views expressed in his articles reflect those of his daytime employer.
Its Indiana University, not University of Indiana
Fixed!
Only 5 better than Schwarber, 3 of which are Cubs. Noice.
Noice!
http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/31561/inside-the-plan-for-kyle-schwarber
According to that article, the Cubs and Schwarber himself see him as their long-term catcher.
Schwarber seems to get up the line pretty quickly. Maybe he can stick in left, at least for a few years. If he is a catcher like the Cubs believe him to be, then Jesus Christ.
He might have the ugliest setup I’ve seen at the plate. His body leaves a lot to be desired. No chance he thrives as catcher but who cares bat will play. Not convinced he isn’t maxed physically now though so he should be dominant in double a ball.
Why waste a bat like that at catcher? The defensive and pitch calling curve is high and distracts from hitting. The injury rate is poor and even the best and healthiest catchers who play other positions skip a game a week.
If he’s not a good natural defensive catcher already, move him off.
That would ruin Epstein’s plan to have his bat at Catcher on his fantasy team.
It takes time to develop a skill
Schwarber sreams ‘trade chip’ when the Cubs decide to pick up pieces at the trade deadline; probably to an AL league team.
No chance that Schwarber is a trade chip. He is part of the Cubs long term plans. The only scenario I see the Cubs trading Schwarber would be to the White Sox if they received Sale in return. Other than that, Schwarber is a future All-Star catcher for the Cubs.
Vogelbach is the trade chip
Need I remind you of that legendary Royals’ prosopect squad a few years back? Statistically–and I know, you think these prospects are somehow different–a number of the prospects will be busts, a number will be solid regulars, and only a tiny proportion will become All-Star level players.
While your statement is true in a general sense, Schwarber doesn’t appear to have the red flags that lead many top prospects to disappoint, at least not at the plate.
Which one of their position players busted exactly? Bubba starlin?
And i should add all royals are all stars this year. Secondly all the cubs have a higher quantity of quality bats proven at higher levels. Bats are generally more projectable especially with the walk rates of schwarber, bryant and soler with a proven stud in rizzo. Baez and alcantara are also way better than any of ghe other bat prospects the royals had after their big 3.
Are you seriously going to reference the KC all star blitz as proof of anything involving player quality?
I remember them constituting the core of a team that went to the World Series.
Mere presence on a world series team does not make Infante better than Kipnis, or Moustakas better than Donaldson. Royals fans have basically ensured that what used to be an entertaining joke of a game is now just a joke of a game.
The all star reference was in satire of his all star caliber player part. Its fairly evident that addison russell for instance will be an above average regular even if his bat never improves much. But mainly i just wanted to emphasize that the cubs position prospects are better than the royals were. Although the royals had the edge in pitching by a large margin. Also wanted to show bubba starling some love, hes still age an age appropriate legitimate prospect.
“Secondly all the cubs have a higher quantity of quality bats proven at higher levels. ”
Using Baseball America’s rankings:
Kris Bryant. #1 overall after AAA
Addison Russell #3 after AA
Wil Myers #4 after AAA
Eric Hosmer #8 after AA
Mike Moustakss #9 after AAA
Jorge Soler #12 after AAA
Kyle Schwarber #19 overall after A+
So it’s 3 vs 5, but they are all highly ranked at the two highest levels.
The Royals also had the #18, #19, #68, and #83 prospects in four pitchers (which turned out miserably for them).
Top wise, the Cubs win, but depth wise I think it’s the Royals.
If you want depth type prospects id add christian villanueva and wilson contreras. In the low minors high upside guys like eloy jiminez, gleybar torres and albert almora. i guess you add can add happ to that now. The position side this is the most loaded farm system/ recent call ups ever. They covered the bust rate and then some. Just beautiful.
You left off javier baez, arismendy alcantara, billy mckinney and dan vogelbach. All double a and higher top 100 prospects on most lists in baez a top 5 as recently as last summer. Man if the padres wrote rizzo off after a bad half season id bet theyd be kicking themselves… o wait…
The biggest revelation of this article was that Carlos Delgado was primarily a catcher at some point in his career. He even played 5 innings there for the Blue Jays.
I guess this is the point we tell you that Craig Biggio was also a catcher once
So was Pablo Sandoval.
I thought Jayson Werth came up as a catcher
And Wil Myers
An all KC All Star team…and that game decides who has home field advantage in the World Series…MLB has to get rid of that scenario…
Maybe keep him up, and use him as a half-game sort of player. Picking the exact part where you want him to enter the game to pinch hit, then having him remain in left, or catcher, or third with Bryant bumping to the outfield?
He cant play third. Maybe first but theres this rizzo guy.
He can keep catching until August 31, but in September – October he has to be the starting LF. He better be at least a half time catcher by June 2016.
Hes supposedly a pretty good framer. Everything else behind the plate needs work though.