Cubs to Sign Shōta Imanaga

With one game to win and the world championship on the line, Japan manager Hideki Kuriyama called on left-hander Shōta Imanaga to start the decisive game of the World Baseball Classic. Availability and pitch count obviously limited Kuriyama’s options, but still, it’s quite an honor, considering Japan’s pitching staff also included Shohei Ohtani, Yu Darvish, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, and wunderkind Roki Sasaki.
The Cubs must have been impressed, because on Monday night Bob Nightengale reported that Chicago had reached an agreement with the two-time NPB All-Star. Imanaga, who had previously been linked with the Giants, will make at least $30 million over two years, with options and incentives that could bring the total value of the deal to $80 million over a longer (but still as-yet-unspecified) term. Jon Heyman called the deal “complicated.”
However much Imanaga’s contract will end up confounding the bookkeepers, it won’t be official until he passes a physical. That must be completed before Imanaga’s posting window expires Thursday afternoon.
Last week, I noted that while the Cubs had made the splashiest pre-Ohtani move of the offseason by smuggling Craig Counsell out of Milwaukee under the gas tank of an Isetta bubble car, Jed Hoyer’s outfit had been quiet since. In order to mount a credible challenge for the NL Central, the Cubs needed to replace the outgoing Jeimer Candelario, Marcus Stroman, and Cody Bellinger, add a first baseman, and probably pick up another starting pitcher besides.
This is a very good start, both in terms of publicity and production.
The 30-year-old lefty was no. 12 on our Top 50 Free Agents list, one spot behind Stroman. Even apart from the WBC, Imanaga had an impressive final year in Japan, with a 2.80 ERA, 174 strikeouts, and 24 walks over 148 innings in 22 Central League starts.
At 5-foot-10, 175 pounds, Imanaga comes with similar questions about his physicality as Yamamoto, but Imanaga’s age and lack of upper-level fastball velocity (92 mph) explain why Yamamoto ended up being guaranteed about 10 times as much money.
Imanaga has been a front-line starter in Japan for more than half a decade now, and is coming off five straight seasons with an ERA of 3.23 or less. That and his international success paint a pretty compelling statistical track record, but he presents an unusual body type for a mid-rotation MLB starter. Imanaga is short enough to play Tom Cruise’s love interest with some clever camerawork. Can a left-handed pitcher that size hold up to an MLB starter’s workload?
“Sure, Bobby Shantz did,” I thought to myself at first. Obviously we’re looking for a more contemporary comparison. Listed dimensions for athletes can be a little imprecise, but in the Wild Card era, 14 left-handed starters listed at under 6-foot have thrown 150 or more innings in a season. This is far enough in the past that Fernando Valenzuela shows up on the list, but ironically that’s a good place to start: A plus athlete who generated power from an unusual delivery.
The short answer is that it’s possible, if the pitcher in question is either a good athlete or a Houston Astro. (Mike Hampton is the most prolific short lefty, and Wandy Rodriguez and Framber Valdez also make the list.)
Imanaga is sufficiently athletic to make it work; he’s bendy and gets good leg drive. He employs a Johnny Cueto-style hesitation move at the top of his leg kick, and while the two could not look any more different physically, if you want a good example of a short pitcher with a strong lower half who dominated over a huge workload despite lacking ideal velo, Cueto is an obvious example.
Imanaga’s best secondary pitch is a low-80s slider; he also throws a changeup and a slow curve. In their matchup at the WBC, Trout doubled off the curveball, though it was a Texas Leaguer that Trout legged out rather than a scalding line drive off the wall. Having a pitch that slow will help Imanaga keep hitters off his low-90s fastball, but the curveball might be so slow it’s easily identifiable out of his hand.
But Imanaga’s best attribute is not his stuff, but his command, which is tremendous. By mixing and locating, Imanaga was able to induce not just weak contact, which you might expect from a finesse left-hander, but impressive strikeout numbers as well.
Assuming that Imanaga can hold up to the rigors of a full MLB workload, the biggest outstanding question is what kind of contact he’ll allow. Perhaps unsurprisingly for a short pitcher with a low release who doesn’t throw a sinker or splitter (Imanaga must’ve been the only guy on Team Japan who didn’t throw a plus-plus splitter), he allows a lot of contact in the air.
Eric Longenhagen pointed this out in his Top 50 writeup: Imanaga’s 8.3% HR/FB ratio looks tame by MLB standards, but the HR/FB rate in Japan is about half what it is on this side of the Pacific. And while NPB is more fly ball-prone than MLB in general, Imanaga’s 58% fly ball rate was still almost 30% higher than league average. Even adjusting for that, we can expect Imanaga to be one of the most fly ball-prone starters in baseball.
That obviously reduces the benefits of playing in front of the Dansby Swanson–Nico Hoerner double play combination… and I can see by the looks on your faces that you’re remembering where the Cubs play their home games.
How big a problem will that be? There’s no way to know until we see Imanaga go through the league a couple times. But assuming a guaranteed salary of $15 million a year over two years, that’s an acceptable risk. Getting any more certainty — Blake Snell, Jordan Montgomery, Sonny Gray before he signed — would’ve cost nearly twice as much money over as much as three times the contract length. It’s an acceptable risk, if this is merely the first of a series of big free agent signings.
Assuming a contract AAV of about $15 million for tax purposes, the Imanaga signing leaves the Cubs with a little over $35 million to spend before they even hit the lowest competitive balance tax threshold. That’s enough space to sign a first baseman, maybe even enough to also get one of the remaining top 10 free agents if they time the market right. And if the Cubs are willing to pay just a little bit in tax, there’s enough talent left on the market to close up those remaining roster holes with ease.
There’s still a long way to go before the Cubs return to their previous status as easy NL Central favorites, but this is a good start.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
I didn’t see the Cubs going in this direction and I’m a little terrified of the fly-ball tendencies described in the article, but the length and value of this contract make it a very nice gamble. I’m curious if this allows the Cubs to play a little looser in trade offers with some of the high-minors pitching they have in search of some offensive reinforcements.
Interestingly enough, that’s what people said about the Cubs signing Ted Lilly prior to the 2007 season. Hopefully this deal works as well for the Cubs as Lilly’s did.
This contract is an absolute steal in the context of the this offseason’s starting pitching market. Does he give up a bunch of fly balls? Sure, but so do some of the best pitchers in MLB. Imanaga also has magician-like control over where he locates his stuff, and that stuff of his is darned good, tending to result in very few hits plus plenty of Ks. I’m stunned there wasn’t more of a bidding war for his services among those who whiffed on Yamamoto
That was my reaction too. I know if he’s good incentives will push it up, but $15 mil a year these days is basically 5th starter/inning eater money. Getting the ceiling of a #3 starter at that price is really nice. Projections have him around 2.5-2.8 WAR.
I saw an Eno Sarris piece today about how Imanaga tends to throw fastballs low in the zone, which is a no-no in the modern game. He might change stuff up and do much better with good coaching.
Ya rumor has it he had a much (double) contract offered
He’s likely to be 91-92 pitching every five games and without the WBC adrenaline boost, but that plays from a lefty with elite carry and high level command.
Funnily enough, I think his slider might need a bit of an adjustment. It’s a (relatively) slow, sweepy slider — a totally different plane than his fastball. Maybe the Cubs will encourage him to throw it harder and shorter. I’ve seen some good changeups out of him, and his curveball has value as a called strike pitch to catch hitters off guard early in counts. Everything he throws plays up because his command is so good, too.
Totally agree with the general sentiment, btw. This deal is a steal for a starter of this quality. I get the concern over his extreme flyball proneness, and he’s already 30, but still. Great deal deal for the Cubs… and hope the wind’s blowing in when he pitches at Wrigley.
I thought there were posting fees on these signings? Is that no longer the case?
He is NOT an international free agent (Senga was last year).
He was posted by the BayStars, so fees will be paid to them.
Am I wrong in remembering that FA signings usually include ZiPS projections? Esp after Dan’s tweet claiming he was the best deal of the offseason, I’m pretty curious
edit: this is the tweet: https://twitter.com/DSzymborski/status/1744904745548964317
It was reported he turned down literally double the money. Unsure the specifics, maybe someone offered him double the gtd money?
“We will give you eleventy billion Pirate dollars per year. Pirate Dollars are just like American Dollars, except you can only spend them on merchandise within the ballpark. And not on food. Or clothing. Or souvenirs. Or parking. Or tickets. Hey, wait, where are you going?”
Hard not to like this deal unless you think he just completely washes out. Even if he’s a Kikuchi-type pitcher (HR heavy lefty with K’s), that deal is more than worth it.
Wonder if he waited a little too long and got squeezed by the deadline
Is Imanaga’s 58% flyball rate 30% higher than NPB average, which would put average around 44-45%< or 30 percentage points higher, which would put average at 28%?
I imagine it's the former, but the phrasing used, while technically accurate, is atypical of how percentages tend to be presented, so I'm hoping for clarification. If it's the latter, I'd be stunned.