Dan Szymborski FanGraphs Chat – 6/11/26
| 11:59 |
: We seem to be having technical issues
|
| 11:59 |
: Nobody can log in and ask questions.
|
| 11:59 |
: And I tried it myself!
|
| 12:00 |
: Unless there’s a fix, we may need to 86 the chat this week. Unless people want to hang around as I share my idle musings about whatever stupid thing I’m thinking about currently.
|
| 12:01 |
: (And no, people should not want to hang around for that)
|
| 12:02 |
: If you’re reading this, hit refresh and it shoudl work now!
You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
|
| 12:02 |
: Is this thing on
|
| 12:03 |
: OK, I have an empty queue because of the technical difficulties, so this is your opportunity to ask me WHATEVER about ANYTHING. Even if I don’t know the answer!
|
| 12:03 |
: Looks like it is fixed after refreshing the page!
|
| 12:04 |
: Spencer Jones 111 wrc+ from zips? Thoughts ?
|
| 12:04 |
: I don’t think it’s CRAZY as a projection. There’s upside, but there’s real downside because he misses a frigging LOT
|
| 12:05 |
: If you don’t connect a ton, you have to REALLY connect when you do, like Murakami. And Jones CAN, but tehre’s risk
|
| 12:05 |
: Hey, Dan. If I were foolish enough to want to create my own projections, and if I wanted to individualize for each stat, would I adjust each stat’s reliability factor, adjust the weights for each year of stats, or do both?
|
| 12:05 |
: There are a lot of ways to skin a cat. Honestly, playing around with Marcel first might give you ideas on things to test
|
| 12:06 |
: Wait, ARE THERE a lot of ways to skin a cat? It seems like it would be straightforward
|
| 12:06 |
: On the prospect side of the house; any prospects who’ve made significant projection gains this so far this year?
|
| 12:06 |
: I can tell you in a minute, but it will be a couple weeks out of data since that was my first MEGA RUN
|
| 12:06 |
: A Dan a man a chat do you project IBB See Tyler Rogers, regorrelyteesbbitcejorpuoyd
|
| 12:06 |
: I do project IBBs
|
| 12:12 |
: OK, as of 5/28
|
| 12:12 |
: the most improved offensive wRC+ for guys 24 and under
|
| 12:12 |
: Jordan walker, Jonah Cox, Victor Figueroa, Jason Schiavone, Mike Sirota, Luis Lara, Miguel Ugueto, Franklin Arias, Yohandy Morales
|
| 12:14 |
: biggest drops: Brennan Orf, Jose Salas, Ryan Stafford, Jose Cordoba, Joseph Redfield, Gabriel Goznalez, Daivd Mershon, Victor Acosta, Jhonkensy Noel
|
| 12:14 |
: I’ll get pitchers, but let me do questions now that we have a queue
|
| 12:14 |
: Does Lombard play a role for NYY this summer ?
|
| 12:15 |
: I think he’ll appear, but I don’t think it’ll be long unless there’s an opportunity to start.
|
| 12:16 |
: Injuries help of course, as would Jones splatting
|
| 12:16 |
: becuase then MAYBE you go with some combination of a Grisham Bellinger Lombard OF
|
| 12:17 |
: I don’t understand the talk about Tatis, Jr’s. homer outage, he’s only one home run back from Guerrero Jr.
|
| 12:17 |
: What do the Jays do with Max Scherzer? The production has been awful, but I feel like the situation is complicated by the fact that he’s a slam-dunk HOFer who demands a bit of respect. Do they release him? Bullpen?
|
| 12:17 |
: I think you have to talk with him and discuss that something is going to have to happen, and the best way for it to happen that doesn’t cause any embarrassment
|
| 12:17 |
: But he HAS to be out of the rotation if you’re serious about competing, I think
|
| 12:18 |
: yes, only six starts, but he’s been bad and REALLY contact-able in those starts
|
| 12:19 |
: The Mets recently featured a Skyline Chili Egg Roll when the Reds rolled into town. Personally, I think a deep fried shell is too heavy of a medium for Skyline chili. I would suggest serving it as-is in a ziplock bag with a spork.
If you wear cargo shorts you can bring your whole family’s meals back to your seats *in your pockets* without the delicate balancing act of open top hot dogs, chicken tenders, fries, etc. Plus, if you have leftovers, it’s already in a resealable container. |
| 12:19 |
: Anything that causes you to eat it is too heavy a medium for skyline chili!
|
| 12:20 |
: REQUIRED IMAGE
|
| 12:20 |
:
|
| 12:20 |
: Please don’t skin cats
|
| 12:20 |
: I won’t, cats fight back!
|
| 12:21 |
: The Matt Damon guy from Ben’s chats has been missing lately. Don’t you worry, Dan, I’m not going anywhere, even when Tim Tebow’s thunder thighs inevitably turn to mush.
|
| 12:21 |
: ZiPS was, I thought, surprisingly low on Tyler Soderstrom coming into this year (I think he had 1.1 WAR projection?). Has it come around on him any more in the time since then?
|
| 12:22 |
: It wasn’t optimistic about his defense, so that’s come up a bit
|
| 12:22 |
: but the offense is nto that far off
|
| 12:22 |
: Nick Kurtz now at nearly 800 PAs with a 168 wRC+ to start his career – do you think that’s his true talent level? Or do you think he’ll end up more of a 140-150 wRC+ guy?
|
| 12:22 |
: I think a 150-155 is most likely
|
| 12:22 |
: How do you think zips will accommodate for A’s players moving from Sacramento to Las Vegas? I would ask about guys that started in Oakland but we know those won’t exist by the time the LV ballpark opens. Will it be years before zips can normalize the ballpark differences?
|
| 12:22 |
: poorly, I assume!
|
| 12:22 |
: The first year is going to be a guessing game
|
| 12:22 |
: dimensions themselves have a very weak game at predicting the factors
|
| 12:22 |
: are you excited for the world cup?
|
| 12:23 |
: No, soccer/association football really isn’t my thing at all
|
| 12:23 |
: No aspersions on those who are really into it, I’m just not
|
| 12:23 |
: My enjoyment of sports tends to be correlated with how much I liked playing it as a kid
|
| 12:23 |
: I really loved playing baseball as a kid
|
| 12:24 |
: I absolutely HATED playing soccer. I like a fairly high ratio of running to doing stuff
|
| 12:24 |
: NO OTHER WAY AROUND
|
| 12:24 |
: In baseball, you’re running a lot if something cool is happening that your’e involved in
|
| 12:25 |
: What did you think of Machado’s comments about the over-reliance on data, specifically for hitters? I know it can be interpreted as a struggling hitter making excuses but I wonder if we’ve also reached a saturation point for sabermetrics and its relevance to hitters.
|
| 12:25 |
: I think the data clicks with some guys and not with others
|
| 12:26 |
: I think he got TOO MUCH criticism. It’s not really his job to understand data himself. If the Padres aren’t communicating things to him in a way that he can get actionable info, that’s on them, not so much him
|
| 12:26 |
: but if he’s just refusing, that would be on him. But I don’t know which is which
|
| 12:26 |
: If you’re the A’s do you send down Lawrence Butler or give him a chance to catch up to his (merely below average instead of terrible) expected stats?
|
| 12:27 |
: PROBABLY keep using him, though be more aggressive at not using him in bad matchups. I don’t think you upgrade on him simply by sending him down
|
| 12:27 |
: Say something good about the Cubs.
|
| 12:27 |
: I really appreciate Ben Brown helping to make my busts/breakouts list better than last year!
|
| 12:27 |
: so far
|
| 12:27 |
: Is this Cubs season over? May and June have not been friendly.
|
| 12:28 |
: No, Recency bias is a big thing
|
| 12:29 |
: (And yes, I meant playing Lombard in the outfield, they should be testing him out there already)
|
| 12:30 |
: I’m not having a brain fart on Lombard. He certainly has the ability to fill in at a corner outfield spot; it’s not a rocket science position that you need real experience on
|
| 12:30 |
: doesn’t Lombard need a power run before they bring him up? I’m thinking (hoping maybe) more OD 2027 (if there is an OD 2027) (which I think there will be) (parentheses)
|
| 12:30 |
: not necessarily
|
| 12:31 |
: Sirota’s Steamer has gone from 82 to 118. since Walker’s ZiPS is 89-108 and he ranks ahead of Sirota on your list, I guess ZiPS is more modest than Steamer there
|
| 12:31 |
: Also remember these are as of 5/28
|
| 12:31 |
: Gun to your head, why do you have a gun to your head? Also, who wins the AL central?
|
| 12:31 |
: The gun to the head questions are strange. It’s a weird thing to threaten a life over!
|
| 12:31 |
: I can think of a lot of reasons for people to be murderously angry at me
|
| 12:32 |
: And really, you can just ask me questions. I’m pretty accessible and talkative
|
| 12:32 |
: What would the score be of a 9 inning game between the best D3 team and two Shohei Ohtanis? Ohtani is pitching and catching, but zero fielders, so most contact will be a hit. Ohtani gets ghost runners.
|
| 12:32 |
: I have no idea off the top of my head but I’ll let others speculate
|
| 12:32 |
: hey “A Dan a man a chat” isn’t a palindrome
|
| 12:33 |
: Do you believe in the re-emergence of Zack Gelof? Not quite to 2023 levels, but as an above average regular?
|
| 12:33 |
: I’ll say broadly averagish
|
| 12:34 |
: True story: I once accidentally said zack gelof wrote I Don’t Like Mondays
|
| 12:35 |
: Is Jeff Mcneil toast?
|
| 12:35 |
: toast? no, but there’s SOME Mailliarding going on
|
| 12:35 |
: Hi Dan- I am befuddled by the closer situation with the CWS. Taylor is perhaps the best closer not named Miller, but his usage is all over. Last week he came in with a 5 run lead to pitch the 6/7th. Days after that he closes. Dominguez has the $20 million contract and would be easier to move with more saves, Taylor getting more saves may mean the WS would pay him more later, or Taylor may start next year. Can you offer any clarity to this murky situation? Thanks!
|
| 12:36 |
: Do you think Grant Taylor is now the White Sox closer? Seranthony Dominguez has been appearing in the 7th and 8th inning lately, and Taylor appears to be the better pitcher of the two. Bryan Hudson got the save yesterday, but Taylor had pitched the ninth and tenth innings the day before and was probably unavailable.
|
| 12:37 |
: I certainly hope he gets more high leverage innings. I think he’s pretty clearly their best closer. But I don’t want to guess what the White Sox will do because they’re still the White Sox
|
| 12:37 |
: There’s a long-term thing with the White Sox in that whether they’re bad or good, they never seem quite cognizant of how they got there
|
| 12:39 |
: So hey, we’re winning with Benintendi, he must be why we’re winning
|
| 12:39 |
: Have you heard of any promising exmaples of how MLB orgs are leveraging LLMs internally? It seems like it’s been a few years now but I haven’t heard many examples of improvements beyond writing code faster
|
| 12:39 |
: I haven’t heard anything
|
| 12:39 |
: I generally talk more theoretical things with front offices
|
| 12:39 |
: rather than the nitty gritty how they make the sausage
|
| 12:40 |
: I’m not a reporter, and mostly want to aid my own insight into things rather than report things, but there’s always some stuff I just wont’ get told
|
| 12:40 |
: Sorry for the questions about projections. I am just getting started with something because they looked fun, and you are an expert, and I thought the chat would be the best place to ask questions.
|
| 12:40 |
: It’s fun to do projection stuff. You learn a lot just experimenting
|
| 12:41 |
: How does zips view Eldridge heading into his early 20s? It seems like he’s already massively over performed all expectations at this age
|
| 12:41 |
: Ask me when I do the full expectations change in a couple weeks
|
| 12:41 |
: Going back to 2023 Brewers position players are +0.20 R/G over their BaseRuns, and helping their pitchers to an ERA -0.41 runs lower than their FIP. Picking up half a run a game on the margins over 550 plus games has to be the residue of some sort of good design, no?
|
| 12:42 |
: The Brewers ARE a really well run franchise generally
|
| 12:42 |
: if they had the Dodgers payroll, I think they’d be a juggernaut
|
| 12:42 |
: Any comment regarding JAWS vs. BOOG for figuring HOF worthiness? Or just a different way of looking at it…
|
| 12:43 |
: I really enjoy the FG article/reddit commentary on it
|
| 12:43 |
: I’ve been tinkering with WAA type approaches as well
|
| 12:43 |
: because I think value and the philosophy of greatness are relatively different
|
| 12:43 |
: It seems like Marcels has a blanket set of weights for three years of stats and a general reliability factor based on playing time. If I wanted to adjust both for, say strikeout rate for batters, which seems to stabilize quickly, would I raise the reliability factor, give more weight to the most recent year of stats, or do a little of both?
|
| 12:44 |
: Both approaches can be valid! The best way to do it is to experiment yourself
|
| 12:44 |
: Sometimes you find something that nobody else has or that people are underestimating
|
| 12:44 |
: I think you radicalized me yesterday… I am neither a pirates fan nor a huge Cutch fan, but seeing where he ranked at 28 relative to other CF, I think I must now lead the cause for his hall of fame candidacy.
|
| 12:44 |
: I fear that I’m one of the writers that is closest, I’m probably in the 90th+ percentile for valuing peak relative to career
|
| 12:45 |
: have you found a good 82-0 variant for baseball
|
| 12:45 |
: I don’t think you can
|
| 12:45 |
: Baseball has too many volatile outcomes
|
| 12:46 |
: Ever watch a Home Run Derby? A LOT of those hits would be outs. And they’re TRYING to get those guys to crush things
|
| 12:46 |
: Something is pretty seriously wrong with Gunnar Henderson, right?
|
| 12:46 |
: Any clue what it may be?
|
| 12:46 |
: Seriously? not sure
|
| 12:46 |
: For one, the pierpherals don’t support a BABIP TAHT low
|
| 12:47 |
: but he IS hitting for less power, less bat speed, so he shoudln’t be having as good a year as his career to date
|
| 12:47 |
: What does ZIPS say about Alec Burleson rest of season compared to start. In my points league, his BA, HR total and lack of K’s is money. Your ZIPS had him as a strong player in my league and it has come to pass. How much regression do you expect in second half?
|
| 12:48 |
: Some, but he’s not CRAZILY outperforming his expectations
|
| 12:48 |
: and it’s not like he wasn’t good last year
|
| 12:48 |
: re llms, now i’m imagining monfort asking gpt if kris bryant will ever play again
|
| 12:49 |
: How many more PAs would you/ZIPs like to see from Bryce Eldridge before making adjustments to his outlook?
|
| 12:49 |
: I don’t think you can have such an if/then. It’s a spectrum
|
| 12:49 |
: Which comeback was less likely: Knicks or Giants?
|
| 12:49 |
: Knicks I’m pretty sure
|
| 12:49 |
: wasn’t there WE in the <1% range?
|
| 12:50 |
: now, DIVISION, maybe giants
|
| 12:50 |
: but playoffs, knicks less likely
|
| 12:50 |
: as in knicks comeback % vs. giants playoff %
|
| 12:50 |
: How are park factors adjusted for one off series like the A’s in Vegas where there is clearly a difference in how the stadium plays but also limited data?
|
| 12:50 |
: I generally use neutral for those
|
| 12:51 |
: The nice thing about neutral is that everyone understands how to take those stats
|
| 12:51 |
: “OK, Szym projected a neutral park, but they’re a hitters park in the end, so I can mentally adjust the raw stats up for hitters and down for pitchers”
|
| 12:52 |
: Using a neutral park when you don’t know is better for providing information to the usersii, since there’s no ambiguity over what you mean
|
| 12:52 |
: In a way, projecting something in an opaque way that slightly improves projections is arguably WORSE than slightly worse performing projections that have clearer meaning
|
| 12:52 |
: How do I get my cat to stop walking on my head when I’m just starting to drift off to dreamland?
|
| 12:53 |
: In my experience, you don’t
|
| 12:53 |
: What do writers do in a lockout?
|
| 12:53 |
: If I remember my 2021-2022 offseason again, mutter “OH FUCK, THE THING I COVER DOESN’T EXIST AT THE MOMENT…AGAIN!” a lot
|
| 12:54 |
: I’ve been hoarding ideas for if we have a prolonged work stoppage this time
|
| 12:54 |
: more ZiPS Time Warp
|
| 12:54 |
: and I’m thinking of doing a series on interesting players who seem largely forgotten for some reason or another.
|
| 12:54 |
: while I was musing on Toby Harrah on social media
|
| 12:55 |
: I called this series in the heat of the moment as FanGraphs Member Berries, but the reference is probably too obscure
|
| 12:56 |
: Does the union have any say in expansion?
|
| 12:56 |
: PLEASE NOT THAT I AM NOT A LABOR LAWYER, AND IF YOU WANT ONE YOU SHOULD GO BUG EUGENE FREEDMAN OR SOMEONE
|
| 12:57 |
: I suspect they do, simply because it was including in the CBA that the owners had the right during the agreement to add up to two teams
|
| 12:57 |
: and the EFFECT of expansions can always be negotiated over, to the extent that they affect workplace conditions
|
| 12:58 |
: How would you recommend taking caffeine?
|
| 12:58 |
: You should not take health advice from me!
|
| 12:58 |
: Are your work dreams about baseball or writing or ZiPS?
|
| 12:58 |
: actual WORK dreams involve writing about baseball
|
| 12:58 |
: sometimes i wake up really bummed
|
| 12:58 |
: because I have a recurring dream genre that is “Me having a mundane, realistic dream that involves me doing my work the next day”
|
| 12:59 |
: and I will wake up feeling like I already wrote my piece and then realize that I still ahve to write it
|
| 12:59 |
: though sometimes dreams will help in that way, because in my dreams, I’ll go over many of the actual arguments that I use
|
| 1:00 |
: Now, not all dreams are like this
|
| 1:00 |
: if you perused my dream log you’d see a LOT more things like:
|
| 1:00 |
: “I got in a fight with Hunter Strickland in an elevator but we agreed to a truce because we had to team up to pass Brexit for some reason.”
|
| 1:00 |
: “I was talking with Albert PUjols during spring training 2019 and he decided to retire after getting schooled by a hardthrowing submariner pitcher for the Dodgers from AA, Peaver Stockfriars.”
|
| 1:01 |
: “I’m guest hosting an ESPN show called “Feed the Discussion” which is a lunchtime sports argument show in which people argue about sports and eat food. It went well, though I introduced myself as just Szymborski. I’m given a second episode, but this time it’s set in Malta for some reaosn and there’s no discussion – I just eat food. But weirdly, it’s South American food. For the last thing, I’m brought penguin meat, which looked like beef and was served raw and it was fairly lemony.”
|
| 1:02 |
: One of my dreams IS kinda coming true
|
| 1:02 |
: “George R.R. Martin took a sabbatical from writing The Winds of Winter so that he could write the entire Webster’s Dictionary in Dothraki.”
|
| 1:02 |
: Enjoyed your McCutchen piece. Which current player are you most excited to do that exercise with?
|
| 1:02 |
: I dunno, it feels like cursing them! lol
|
| 1:03 |
: Maybe Bryant
|
| 1:03 |
: He’s not making the Hall of Fame now, and he might have
|
| 1:04 |
: I might do one with Bryant/Baez/Rizzo
|
| 1:04 |
: I would imagine that the MLBPA would be, generally, pro-expansion. While the details do matter, it means more MLB jobs!
|
| 1:04 |
: Why on earth would you want to pass Brexit?
|
| 1:04 |
: I don’t know, I wouldn’t have personally!
|
| 1:06 |
: There’s also a dream in which I get into a fistfight with Steven Goldman and I’ve always liked him!
|
| 1:06 |
: Is Jac Caglianone a thing now?
|
| 1:06 |
: Ic ertainly hope so since I’ve been stanning him aggressively since spring training last year
|
| 1:06 |
: It wasn’t a dream, Hunter Strickland has gotten in fights with literally everyone for literally every reason.
|
| 1:06 |
: Squirtgun to your head, what makes ZIPS continue to believe Jackson Holliday will continue stepping up to above-average player? How long a shadow does minor league excellence cast? When will lightly armed people stop asking Jackson Holliday questions in Fangraphs chats?
|
| 1:07 |
: A lot of it is simply that there’s a lot of uncertainty and there’s an especial amount of uncertainty on very young players who haven’t had a breakout yet
|
| 1:07 |
: Does the ZiPS projection for a player change over time while that player is out with an injury? I’m thinking particularly of Roman Anthony–my personal expectations for the rest of his season have gotten worse and worse the more he’s faded from the conversation, but I’m wondering if, per plate appearance, ZiPS feels the same way. Insofar as it has feelings.
|
| 1:07 |
: It doesn’t until he comes back, if that makes sense
|
| 1:07 |
: I dont’ want to commit ZiPS to predicting a future injury unless it’s a very straightforward one like TJ surgery
|
| 1:07 |
: so when someone gets back from an injury, it’ll know “Knee, 55 days”
|
| 1:08 |
: but it doesn’t know it ahead of time, if that makes sense
|
| 1:08 |
: well now you’re going to get everyone who members member berries saying they member them, while those who don’t will stay silent, the combination giving a potentially false impression of their obscurity
|
| 1:08 |
: What other mass consumed thing (eligion, politics, eating, pooping, etc) would you most want to see SABRized? Meaning, a bunch of nerds crunch numbers and the subject matter is exponentially better understood and mentally processed?
|
| 1:08 |
: I don’t know, poopemetrics sounds interesting
|
| 1:08 |
: The Brewers will never have the Dodgers payroll. It is, however, quite possible that the Dodgers hire away the Brewers’ front office
|
| 1:09 |
: But it woudl be more fun for the Brewers if they had the Dodgers payroll!
|
| 1:09 |
: OK, on that note, time fo rme to head out for another week
|
| 1:09 |
: thanks everyone who stuck around whilei we figured out the technical difficulty
|
| 1:10 |
: well, not that *I* figured it out. Sean Dolinar figured it out. I just whined abou tit
|
| 1:10 |
: I take that back. MIL could have the LAD payroll. But it would require a salary cap with floor such that the band is very narrow. And that’s not happening anytime soon
|
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
This whole log in to chat thing is just not working for me. I’m logged into the website and yet the chat widget still wants me to log into to post.
I’ve tried two different web browsers on my iPad and get the same result. I guess chats are no longer something that I can interact with.
It’s not working for me either! Or anyone.
I feel less special, but relieved that it isn’t a problem on my end. 😉
It shoudl work now if you refresh
Still down for me.
Have you tried a different browser? I still get the “Log in for full access” message on Chrome so something is still wonky, but it works using Safari.
Same here – I got in at first, but after about 15 minutes I keep getting the log in prompt and refreshing, logging out/logging back in doesn’t help. I support the idea of requiring a (free) membership to chat, but the kinks just need to be worked out.
I’ll notify channel