Dead Money on 2020 MLB Team Payrolls

Yesterday I took a look at team payrolls, offseason spending, and the outlook for MLB spending on players as a whole compared to the last few years. Today we’ll take a look at one portion of team payrolls most teams would rather avoid. No organization wants to be paying players to play for other teams or to sit in the minors or to simply be out of the game, at least in the abstract. At some point though, teams will kick in money for a trade because the overall savings can be utilized elsewhere, the prospect return is slightly better, or because there is better use of a roster spot. Those payments become dead money.

As in past years, I’ve defined dead money as generally any money a team is paying out to a player who no longer appears on their 40-man roster. There are three types of dead money:

  1. Money paid to players who have been released. Those players are free to sign with other teams, but the team releasing the player still owes the money remaining on the contract.
  2. Money paid to other teams as compensation for players who have been traded. Generally, we see teams cover a portion of a contract to receive a better return in trade.
  3. Money paid to players who are still in the organization but who have been removed from the 40-man roster. Any team could have claimed these players if they were willing to take on the contract, and the player probably could have elected fee agency, but then he would forfeit his right to the guaranteed money.

Here are the teams with the most money on their current payrolls going somewhere other than their roster.

The Red Sox take the stop spot with Rusney Castillo off the 40-man roster and half of David Price‘s salary going with him to Los Angeles, though Castillo’s money doesn’t count against Boston’s competitive balance tax. Seattle coming in at No. 2 is a bit of a surprise given that they sport one of the lower payrolls in the game. Part of their $28 million is offset by the Cardinals’ $4 million payment for Mike Leake, but roughly one quarter of Seattle’s payroll is going somewhere other than to players on the Mariners. The Diamondbacks’ situation is similar to the Red Sox, with Yasmany Tomás in the last year of his deal and the team also paying part of Zack Greinke’s contract with the Astros. For the first time since I’ve been doing this dating back to 2016, the Dodgers are not one of the top two teams. When factoring in Boston’s payment for Price, the club almost nets out. Any team not mentioned above does not have any dead money on the payroll for this season.

Looking at the contract on an individual basis, we’ll group them by player type. First, here are the players who have been released.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Released Players Owed Money in 2020
Player 2020 Money Owed Team Current Team/Status
Wei-Yin Chen $22.0 M Marlins Mariners
Jacoby Ellsbury $21.2 M Yankees Free Agent
Troy Tulowitzki $14.0 M Blue Jays Retired
Zack Cozart $12.7 M Giants Free Agent
Héctor Olivera $8.5 M Padres Released
Prince Fielder $9.0 M Rangers Retired
David Wright $9.0 M Mets Retired
Ian Kinsler $4.3 M* Padres Padres Front Office
*Kinsler’s remaining guarantee was to be negotiated with the Padres as part of his front office role.

For Wright, it is assumed that the Mets are recovering $3 million of his $12 million salary through insurances. For the Rangers, part of Fielder’s money is offset by payments from the Tigers as well as insurance proceeds. Cozart was released by the Giants, but his acquisition came solely as part of being able to essentially purchase Will Wilson as a prospect out of the Angels system.

Here are the players who are still in the organization as of last season but have been removed from the 40-man roster.

Players Owed Money in 2020 Removed From 40-Man Roster
Player 2020 Money Owed Team Traded Team
Yasmany Tomas $17.0 M Diamondbacks Minors
Rusney Castillo $14.3 M Red Sox Minors
Odubel Herrera $7.4 M Phillies Minors
Yaisel Sierra $6.5 M Dodgers Minors

Castillo was a below-average hitter in Triple-A in 2019 after posting good numbers the year before. Due to a previous loophole in the competitive balance tax payroll situation, Castillo’s salary does not count towards it and bringing him to the majors would put the Red Sox over the tax level. As for Tomas, he hit pretty well in Triple-A last season but has always struggled defensively. Sierra spent all of 2018 and most of 2019 out with a shoulder injury. Herrera received a domestic violence suspension last season. Castillo and Tomas are in the last year of their contracts while Sierra is owed $8.5 million in 2021.

The biggest group of players where money exchanged hands between teams comes in the form of trades. Usually the amounts are small, but in some cases, like Price, they can be quite substantial.

Traded Players Owed Money in 2020
Player 2020 Money Owed Team Traded Team
David Price $16.0 M Red Sox Dodgers
Jay Bruce $11.6 M Mariners Phillies
Kenta Maeda $10.4 M* Dodgers Twins
Zack Greinke $10.3 M Diamondbacks Astros
Mike Leake $9.0 M Mariners Diamondbacks
Prince Fielder $6 M Tigers Rangers
Héctor Olivera $4.7 M Dodgers Braves
Mike Leake, $4.0 M Cardinals Mariners
Edwin Encarnación $4.0 M Mariners Indians
Robinson Canó $3.8 M Mariners Mets
Giancarlo Stanton $3.0 M** Marlins Yankees
Evan Longoria $2.2 M Rays Giants
Starling Marte $1.5 M Pirates Diamondbacks
Corey Kluber $.5 M Indians Rangers
*Of the amount the Dodgers are sending the Twins, $7 million is tentative and based on Maeda’s incentives vesting.
**Technically, the Marlins haven’t paid the Yankees anything until after Stanton doesn’t opt out, but for the competitive balance tax with the Yankees and Marlins (ha), $3 million is prorated over the life of the remaining deal.

Bruce was traded to to the Mariners as part of an offset to Cano’s salary so taking on that money was likely a pretty good deal to be able to pay less than market value for Cano’s good seasons and not have to pay for his declining years. The Diamondbacks were able to get a better prospect haul by paying down some of Greinke’s deal while most of the rest of the amounts are smaller in nature, serving more as a deal-finisher than major part of the trade.

In all, there’s about $225 million in dead money this season and that amounts to only around 5% of total money paid to players this year. It’s slightly higher than it was the last couple years at $200 million, but it is in line with averages over the past four seasons.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

69 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
pintobeane
6 years ago

Edit: Stanton isn’t on the Dodgers (as shown in the chart).

marlinslou
6 years ago
Reply to  Craig Edwards

Hey Craig, not to be a nitpicky jerk, but Chen technically has deferred payments so the Marlins owe him $19 million in 2020, and $15 million in 2021. I don’t know how that gets spread out for a luxury threshold (which the Marlins obviously won’t reach), but just saying if that implicates this or the roster resource page. This is definitely an unusual contract due to Loria being Loria.

socalkdgMember since 2020
6 years ago

Wish Albert Pujols was dead money.

Mule
6 years ago
Reply to  socalkdg

I’m guessing Chris Davis wishes Chris Davis was dead money.

Da Bear
6 years ago
Reply to  Mule

Chris Davis’s deal includes Bonilla-style deferred payments running all the way to 2037, so he just needs to be patient and that’ll become a reality soon enough.

Hank G.Member since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  socalkdg

Yes, paying Pujols $28 million to play for the Angels is arguably worse than paying him $28 million not to play for them.

J. T.
6 years ago
Reply to  Hank G.

Absolutely, he’s taking up a roster spot to be a subpar player.

Lanidrac
6 years ago
Reply to  J. T.

He’s only a subpar player due to WAR’s unfair penalization for the DH position. He’s still a better player than anyone the Angels could call up from AAA to replace him.

mookie monster
6 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

He’s an offense-only player who hasn’t had a wRC+ above 100 in three years.

rosen380
6 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

If 1B moves over to DH they get a “penalty” of 5 runs per 1458 innings. OK, you you object to that.

Do you object to a SS losing the same five runs if they move to 2B/3B or the *10* runs that a CFer loses when they move to a corner?

DougMember since 2019
6 years ago
Reply to  socalkdg

This just illustrates the difficulty in coming up with a good definition of “dead money.”

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago

We don’t know yet if the Yankees are going to be able to wriggle out of paying Ellsbury. Is the assumption that, because of laches, they won’t be able to?

MikeD
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

They still owe him the money unless it’s reduce through the arbitration process, or the two sides come to some agreement. The Yankees saying they won’t pay it doesn’t absolve them of the obligation. Hard to guess either way how that will go. A year back I’d have said there was a zero chance, but then the Mets were able to significantly reduce the Cespedes obligation. Based on what I’ve read, I’d be surprised if the Yankees get out of paying the last year of the deal, yet there is much we don’t know. Well, basically everything!

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

I agree, for the most part. The difference with the Cespedes situation is that he was injured in a non-baseball activity, and very possibly one that his contract specifically forbade. So the Mets would have had a great chance of getting out of most or all of his contract.

MikeD
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

True. That’s also why I don’t think the Yankees have much chance here. It appears Ellsbury was attempting various ways to actually return to playing. Even if unauthorized, even if the doctor provided PEDs ( which they likely can’t prove), they’d have to show this somehow prevented Ellsbury from returning. I don’t see it. Yet, as I said prior, we don’t know anything. The Yankees must see something here. Maybe their goal is to threaten Ellsbury so that he takes a reduced salary his final year.

ScoreboardMember since 2016🏆 MVP
6 years ago

Wei-Yin Chen is owed $22M by the Marlins??? That’s 1/3 of their entire payroll for next year! Have I been living under a rock? I had to go to baseball reference to understand where this came from (https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/chenwe02.shtml)

Looks like it was a reasonable for the first 3 years (offering $10-15M per year for a ~2 WAR SP), but was ridiculously backloaded to nearly double in cost.

How has this contract not been discussed more when we talk about the Marlins rebuilding?

JoserMember since 2021
6 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Probably because it would only be ~15% of the payroll of an “average” team — even less on a “competitive” one — and it will be off the books by the time they’re putting the finishing touches on their rebuild (which for most teams means “spending on FAs to augment a young drafted-and-developed core, but this is the Marlins so… we’l see).

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Joser

They took on $400m in debt when they purchased the team, and I’ll be shocked if they do any real spending until that’s paid back. Assuming they make $50m profit each year (?), it’s going to be a while.

MikeD
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I wouldn’t be surprised at all if the long-term plan of the Marlins’ owners is to eventually move the team out of Florida unless they can figure out a way to monetize it through a cable/RSN deal and get fans to return.

Lanidrac
6 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

“Return” implies that they were ever there in the first place, which isn’t true aside from the first year with the new stadium. Professional summer sports just don’t work in the Snowbird State.

GeneralKnarf
6 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

I’d love to know what the actual top potential for MLB is, in Florida. In 49 combined seasons with the Marlins and Rays, we’ve had exactly zero where a team had a good owner/good stadium combo

MikeD
6 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

I can’t disagree.

mookie monster
6 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Tempting to conclude that baseball and Florida won’t ever mix, but the teams in Atlanta and Texas seem to do just fine so it’s clearly not (entirely) a weather issue.

marlinslou
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

That’s a good debate. They have roughly $31.25 million locked up in Dickerson, Rojas, Chen (deferred), and Kintzler (likely buyout) for next year. They’ll have a few arbitration cases (Anderson, Alfaro, Ca. Smith, relievers, etc.) that’ll probably add another say $11.75 to make it round numbers. Total $43 for lets say 7 guys on the 26 man. Then they have massive club controlled guys worth looks (L. Diaz, I. Diaz, Berti, M. Harrison, J. Sanchez, H. Ramirez, M. Sierra, Alcantara, P. Lopez, S. Sanchez, E. Cabrera, Neidert, Guzman, Brigham, Vesia, Sharp, Tarpley, and more relievers, etc.), where it’s realistic they’ll have at least 16+ guys making a combined say $10 million. So that’s practically the entire roster for $53 million, and they can get rid of $14+ of that if they trade Dickerson and Rojas if J. Chisholm and Bleday are ready sooner than expected. If payroll rises even slightly from 2020, they could have $30-35m to spend, and more if Rojas/Dickerson are moved. I don’t know if we considering that “spending” in terms of modern baseball, but that’s 2 pretty major free agent upgrades and opens up trade possibilities where they can move 3-4 guys for 1 for another upgrade. I don’t think this is as bleak as some people think it is (TV deal gets renegotiated in a year, and they’ll eventually get someone to take stadium naming rights, etc.), but they ABSOLUTELY need to spend that money next year and internally create a half dozen more Andersons/Alcantaras at minimum. I’m cautiously optimistic they have a vision as all the moves make sense besides the Yelich dumpster fire.

MikeD
6 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Seems like a “gift” left behind by the previous owner, Jeff Loria, who knew he was going to sell the team before he ever had to fund the balloon payments at the end. I was quite sure Loria had the full intention to sell the Marlins as soon as he signed Stanton to a 10-year extension.

phinsfanuk
6 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

As a marlin fan I can assure you it’s been a frequent topic of conversation, it’s the marlins so outside of marlin fans, most happenings are ignored.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
6 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Loria knew he was fleeing before that deal (and Stanton’s) really kicked in, so he figured it wasn’t his problem.

ScoreboardMember since 2016🏆 MVP
6 years ago

What has to happen in order for a player to be ‘retired’? Other than announcing publicly do they explicitly need to file with the MLBPA? (asking because Ellsbury might as well be retired, but I recognize there’s likely some nuance I’m missing)

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

I think they do need to file paperwork with the league (and maybe the union). Lots of players “retire” but keep getting paid. That means they may need to stay on the 40-man roster for at least part of the year so that the team can get some insurance. Wright and Prince could have just refused to retire and gotten paid that way if they could have been medically cleared. It’s the difference between them and Chris Davis. If Davis actually officially retires, the Orioles won’t have to pay him.

manormachine
6 years ago

What about deferred money? Cause I’m pretty sure the Mets are still paying Bobby Bonilla.

rosen380
6 years ago
Reply to  manormachine

… and Prince Fielder and Ken Griffey Jr and Todd Helton and Manny Ramirez and Ichiro Suzuki and Rafael Soriano and Chris Davis and Bruce Sutter.

There are probably 100s more past and future.

RobertMember since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  rosen380

The Mets are still paying Brett Saberhagen too

David Klein
6 years ago
Reply to  manormachine

This is so tired the Braves are still paying Bruce Sutter and almost every team is paying former players in deferments

synco
6 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article213840114.html

Even more than that, the Braves are still actually only paying interest on Sutter’s contract. They apparently still owe him the amount of his deferment in full ($9.1m) next year.

The real lesson of these stories is that interest rates were insane in the 1980s and early 90s.

MustBunique
6 years ago
Reply to  manormachine

Not sure why you’re getting downvoted, I always like to think about the fact that Bonilla is still getting paid. Smart man.

mookie monster
6 years ago
Reply to  MustBunique

Honestly it seems like, for all the flack the Mets took for it, the deal works out just fine for everyone. $1.2 million/year is a nice little annuity for Bonilla, but for the Mets it already looks like chump change on a major league payroll and in 10-15 years it will be a rounding error.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
6 years ago

Don’t the Red Sox still owe Kung-Fu Panda $5M in 2020?

FrodoBeck
6 years ago

That Hector Olivera trade remains a work of art by the Dodgers FO.

johansantana17Member since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  FrodoBeck

Both Alex Wood trades were excellent.

hbarMember since 2020
6 years ago

This is fine, but a dead money analysis that doesn’t include Hosmer feels flawed.

synco
6 years ago
Reply to  hbar

Thanks to Hosmer we can finally put a price on leadership: $144 million paid over 8 years.

David Klein
6 years ago
Reply to  synco

I’ll never get anyone’s fandom of Hosmer but Bill James and Brian Kenny being Hosmer fans is beyond baffling

Max Power
6 years ago
Reply to  synco

Well he’s been sub-replacement level the last 2 years so it’s more like $150 million

kylegodown
6 years ago

How about Odubel Herrera? He’s off the Phillies 40 man and in minor league camp.

emh1969
6 years ago

Where do buyouts/declined options fit into this?

Baseball Reference shows that Indians paying Dan Otero 100K and Jason Kipnis 2.5 million for their declined options.

Seems like those should be included as well.

rosen380
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

I think teams generally count them as part of last year.

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  rosen380

Could be but I can’t find anything to confirm. Baseball Reference lists them as a 2020 expense. In their 2019 contracts, Cot’s lists the buyout as a projected 2020 expense. But in their 2020 contracts, they don’t show up anywhere.

drtrixMember since 2016
6 years ago

Should Bobby Bonilla’s annual 1.2 million from the Mets be listed in released players table?

drtrixMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  drtrix

Nm I just noticed manormachine’s post below.

synco
6 years ago

Man that Prince Fielder contract. Dumb as hell from the moment it was signed, then somehow even more of a disaster than could have possibly been expected. $214m for -0.2 WAR. Is it (literally) the worst contract ever?

AnonMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  synco

IN terms of WAR/$$ it probably is, but only because the denominator in that case is so small. To me, the worst has to be Sandoval since the Sox gave him $95M for either -1.8 fWAR or -2.1 bWAR (depending on your preference) and unlike Fielder, who got injured, the Sox paid Sandoval $37.1M to just go away.

synco
6 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Whoops, I forgot to include the two Detroit years. So it’s $214m for 7.5 WAR. Still not too awesome. Would be interesting to see what he actually cost the teams after insurance was taken into account.

Somehow it’s amazing to me that Sandoval is only 33 years old. He seems like he’s from a different era.

AnonMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  synco

I know, Sandoval is an interesting story. I thought he was actually a decent signing by the Sox but man did that not work out. Boston actually signed both him and HanRam the same offseason and HanRam’s deal wasn’t a whole lot better – $88M for 1.4 bWAR before they released him partway thru 2018 and ate the remaining ~$16M or so on his deal. He would be in the negative WAR also if he hadn’t pulled it together for a good 2016 (147 G, 620 PA, .866 OPS, 30 HR and 111 RBI). HanRam’s #1 statistical comp at age 25 per b-ref was Jeter. Just never was the same guy or healthy after that.

Between the 2 Boston paid $183M for a combined -0.7 bWAR over 4 years (well 5 years with the 2020 buyout for Panda)

eph1970Member since 2020
6 years ago

If a player retires, doesn’t that void his contract?

AnonMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  eph1970

It does, that is why even though Fielder and Wright held “retirement” news conferences, they didn’t officially retire until they received settlements of the rest of their contracts. Michael Cuddyer retired after 2015 even though he had another year at $12.5M in 2016. (though looking at news stories now, it looks like there may have been a buyout involved there as well).

However, if a player is released (ie, Tulo or Ellsbury if he wins his legal action against the Yankees) then they are owed the rest of their deal but it probably is a good question on whether an official retirement filed with the league would void the rest of the money they are owed. I would assume either A) no it doesn’t void the rest of their deal or B) Tulo’s retirement announcement was not official just like Fielder’s or Wright’s.

Careless
6 years ago
Reply to  Anon

I can think of one who did just retire and throw away a bunch of money, Gil Meche

AnonMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Careless

I remembered his situation but I couldn’t think of the name.,

MikeD
6 years ago

So when you say “previous loophole in the competitive balance tax…”, does that mean the loophole was eventually closed, but Rusney Castillo and Yasmany Tomas are grandfathered in under the prior CBA? It always struck me as weird that a situation was created where a MLB team was incented to forever keep a player in the minor leagues simply to avoid the luxury tax issue. Even if Castillo was decent, the Red Sox would have kept him in AAA. The same with Tomas now. He probably would have some value as a bat in the AL as a DH. He won’t get the chance.

tung_twista
6 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

A 29 year old with terrible corner outfield defense who just hit wrc+ 116 in the MINORS and zero success in the majors does not deserve a chance regardless of his contract situation. If anything, it was Tomas’s contract situation that afforded him so much opportunity.

timprov
6 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

They were grandfathered in, but it doesn’t matter to Tomas because the Diamondbacks don’t care about the CBT. And if Castillo has real positive value he could be traded to a team that didn’t have tax considerations. It hurts him a little bit in not having the opportunity for a cup of coffee and maybe take off from there, but how many millions of dollars is that worth really?

WerthlessMember since 2020
6 years ago

It would be interesting to see the money allocated to players projected for <=0 WAR. This would include your retired players, but also your Pujols contracts, which are effectively dead money. You might call it "unproductive salary costs" or something similar.

Famous Mortimer
6 years ago
Reply to  Werthless

As long as we get a similar one where we see which teams are getting ludicrous production from minimum-wage contracts.

The GuruMember since 2026
6 years ago

for some of these players like prince fielder who left due to injury, the insurance is paying the salary. The team is not out any dead money for that player.

Lanidrac
6 years ago

What about money owed as deferred payments to players no longer on the team? For example, starting next year the Cardinals will owe Albert Pujols $2M annually for about a decade for the contact extension they gave him for the years 2004-2011. Do those situations not technically count as “dead money,” since the teams planned all along to be making those payments as part of the compensation for the years the player was under contract with them?

johansantana17Member since 2026
6 years ago

How does that 5% figure compare to the NFL? I’d assume it’s substantially lower in the MLB based on how often people talk about dead money in football.

daveperek
6 years ago

First time in years that Matt Kemp’s name isn’t on here.