Defense Is At Its Best In October, Too

Hello! Do you like baseball posts about how the playoffs are different? You have come to one of the right places.

Let’s go over some easy stuff. The playoffs, just by being what they are, select for the best baseball teams. Playoff rosters are selective for the best hitters, and they’re also selective for the best pitchers. Because of the nature of the series, and with all the off days, you see bullpens used more aggressively. We wrote about that yesterday, and everyone has written about that on every day, for the past few weeks. The Indians are in the World Series, and they mostly have their bullpen to thank, and, yeah, that’s the big story in the AL as we wait to identify the other half.

I want to talk briefly about how defense factors into this. Maybe it’ll surprise you, or maybe it won’t, but come playoff time, even batted balls themselves more often meet a negative fate. Strikeouts tend to go up, and homers tend to go down, but even when you concentrate on plays where hitters knock the ball fair, you still see things favoring run suppression.

I linked once before to this recent Ben Lindbergh article about the Blue Jays. I’m sorry about that timing, Blue Jays fans, but something in there jumped out to me, something that was almost a throwaway point. Quote:

Defenses are stronger in October, too?—?this year’s Cubs, for instance, have held opponents to a historically low batting average on balls in play. From 1995–2015, the league-wide batting average on balls in play was .298 during the regular season, but only .284 in the playoffs.

So let’s think about that. Or, let’s even examine that. You’re already familiar with BABIP. I’m going to use that, and I’m also going to use SLGBIP, which is the same thing, but giving some extra credit to doubles and triples. The stats pretty much tend to mirror one another but there’s nothing wrong with being more thorough. Here’s a plot comparing the playoffs to the regular season over the wild-card era:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

playoffs-vs-regular-season

What you see is essentially what was quoted. In the playoffs, BABIP is lower, and SLGBIP is lower. Only once in this window has there been a higher playoff BABIP than regular-season BABIP. Only twice has there been a higher playoff SLGBIP. Clearly, batted balls just kind of do worse when October rolls around. I’ll note that, so far this year, playoff BABIP is down by 35 points, which is the biggest gap observed. Playoff SLGBIP is down by 47 points, which is almost the biggest gap observed. So, it’s not just that the pitching this October has been tough.

You might now pick up on the fact that this analysis is leaving something out! This is comparing performance among playoff teams to regular-season performance among all teams. Let’s fix that. Here is how the playoff teams have done during the regular season, compared to the league-average teams.

playoff-teams-vs-league

Sure, over the whole wild-card era, the average regular-season BABIP is .298. However, the average regular-season BABIP just for playoff teams — weighted by number of playoff games played — is .293. For SLGBIP, the difference is .379 and .370. What this is showing is that the playoffs have been slightly selective for better team defenses, which isn’t a total surprise. And, yeah, pitchers might be a small part of this. Can’t really separate the two. Anyway, glance over at 2016 — this year’s playoff teams were 15 BABIP points better than average during the year. That’s the biggest gap in the era! Thanks, Cubs! Particularly good defenses also showed up in 2002. That’s the last time there was such a big difference in playoff-team SLGBIP.

Now we can close this out. This time, let’s compare playoff statistics to the regular-season statistics of just the playoff teams. It’s like an adjusted version of the first plot. I didn’t make any adjustments for roster construction so this isn’t perfect, but it should be most of the way there.

playoffs-vs-playoff-teams

Remember how 2002 was arguably the last time such good defensive teams made the playoffs? Funny enough, that October, defenses underachieved. Even in the playoffs, on average, teams do better than their regular-season BABIPs by 10 points. They do better than their regular-season SLGBIPs by 16 points. Above-average defenses have become even more above-average, and just so far this month, the BABIP gap is 20 points. The SLGBIP gap is 27 points. Those are bigger than usual, following a decade or so of the playoffs more closely mirroring the regular season.

The playoffs select in part for better-than-average defensive units. For what I imagine is a variety of reasons, in the playoffs, those defensive units get even better. Balls in play are turned into more outs. Defensive liabilities probably get less time. The weather is colder. Hittable pitchers pitch less, and relievers pitch more. It’s not like everything should favor the run-suppression side — remember, the playoffs also select for above-average hitters. But their ability doesn’t counteract everything working against them. Hitters look mostly like themselves, but everything is made just a little bit worse. It’s harder for them to hit the ball, it’s harder for them to hit the ball out, and it’s harder for them to find a part of the field where there isn’t a defender stationed nearby.

You could try to look in here for developing trends. Is October defense getting even better? Are teams, say, able to better prepare, and/or exploit things they notice as series progress? There’s more to explore, I’m certain. For now, the important thing to understand: Hitting in the playoffs is incredibly hard. Everybody already knew the pitchers are almost exclusively terrific. There are also fewer holes available around and behind them. Put it together and there are hitters who might argue the playoffs are a little bit rigged.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Paul22
10 years ago

I feel defense has been pretty shoddy for the most part in the post season, based on the eye test anyways. Balls do not look like its jumping off bats, I suspect the exit velocity (better pitching, balls, etc) might be lower in the post season and accounting for the lower numbers

John Autin
10 years ago

Nice post. Please forgive this tangent, but … The statements that “homers tend to go down” in the postseason and “SLGBIP is lower” are both strictly true, but can be misleading in some contexts.

Most often, and especially this year, postseason power holds more steady than other offensive positives. For instance, this year:
— BA is down by 17% (.255 to .218)
— HR% is down just 9% (3.0% to 2.8%)

Power’s impact rises in the postseason. These measures:
— Pct. of all runs that are scored by homer
— HRs as a share of hits
— Total bases per hit
are all up this postseason compared to the regular year.

This is consistent with your theme, as homers are the only offense that’s (virtually) immune to defensive performance — whereas (doubles+triples) as a share of hits is down this postseason.

ab
10 years ago

Is BABIP affected by cold weather?

Aaron
10 years ago

Unless you’re the Dodgers :'(

Dave TMember since 2016
10 years ago

Interesting post. Thanks, Jeff.

I’ll point out a couple of other likely contributing factors.

BABIP league-wide is higher with runners on base. This season it was .305 with runners on base versus .297 with the bases empty. Some of that is probably selection bias – worse pitchers who give up more hard contact also allow more baserunners – but logically some of it is defensive positioning. The first baseman covers less ground by holding a runner at first, and some extreme shifts aren’t practical with runners on base. So better pitching allowing fewer baserunners should feed back into a little bit better BABIP due to defensive positioning, though the impact looks to be only a small part of the observed decline vs. the regular season.

I also strongly suspect that the playoff schedule is a factor. Jeff covers some of that under the umbrella of not playing defensive liabilities – e.g., a backup utility infielder who may not be a very good defensive shortstop isn’t going to be in the lineup to give the starting shortstop a rest day in the playoffs.

More generally, however, I’d think that days off including travel days result in better defense as (1) players can rest little aches and pains and (2) travel days in the playoffs mean that teams don’t have to play a game, travel to another city, and then immediately play another game (barring rainouts in the playoffs). I don’t know if there are publicly available studies on it, but I’d be very surprised if a player’s defense is as good when he is, to take a regular season example, in the middle of a road trip where he’s playing on his 8th straight day across 3 different cities. Perhaps there’s also a small impact of not having late West Coast start times in the playoffs, so Central and Eastern time zone teams don’t have to play West Coast games that start after 9 pm Central / 10 pm Eastern. I think that the playoffs also generally avoid the “day game after a night game” pairing that occurs during the regular season (especially on Sundays).

So the playoff schedule logically should result in sharper, less fatigued fielders than what we have for many games in the regular season.