Designated Hitter is the Highest Paid MLB Position
If you were to examine the spectrum of defensive positions, going from easiest to most difficult, it would probably look something like this: Designated Hitter-First Baseman-Left Field-Right Field-Center Field-Third Base-Second Base-Shortstop-Catcher. Right field and left field are very similar and center field, second base, and third base are also bunched together under the typical spectrum. However, when looking for the positions that pay the most money, the positions that are the easiest to play make the most money. A similar point, in a similar fashion, was made last year at this time, and it remains true. A combination of the free agent system, aging, and the decline that puts the spectrum to use mean first basemen and designated hitters make the most money while shortstops tend to make the least when taking all starters into account.
I took every position player and designated hitter starter from our FanGraphs Depth Charts and put that alongside the salary information from Cot’s Contracts to find an average salary for the 30 starters at every position with the 15 starters at designated hitter. As was the case last year, first base and designated hitter make the most money, although this season, with Albert Pujols moving to designated hitter, first base lost its crown.

At first glance, it makes little sense to pay players at first base significantly more than at shortstop. They do not accumulate significantly more value over the course the season. However, all players are not acquired at similar costs. To make a lot of money in Major League Baseball, a player needs to hit free agency, and to hit free agency, a player needs at least six years of service time. We know that defensive peaks occur earlier, which means it will be more difficult for a very good defensive shortstop to hit free agency near his peak, while a player who relies less on defense is more likely to be viewed as still in his peak when he hits his first payday.
We also have the issue of players moving down the defensive spectrum. If the player is a good enough hitter to keep playing everyday, it is possible that moving down the fielding spectrum can keep the aging, more expensive player on the field. The simplest explanation is that power pays in free agency, and defensive deficiencies are excused on the free agent market.
Breaking things down by position, we can start with the designated hitter.

Every one of the players represented above started at a position other than designated hitter. Most began as corner outfielders or first baseman, but Alex Rodriguez, Albert Pujols, and Carlos Santana all entered the majors in more defensively difficult positions. First basemen are in a similar spot.

There are a lot more players here that started at first base, but around one-third of the players started at more strenuous positions, including the top name on the list, Miguel Cabrera, and five of the top 9 players.
We see about a 20% drop when moving from first base to the corner outfield positions.

Right field present an interesting scenario as it is one of two positions without a player making above $20 million (third base is the other), has almost one-third of the players making the minimum salary, yet still ranks as one of the most well-paid positions due to all the players making above $10 million. This should also serve as a reminder that Giancarlo Stanton is not yet one of those players due to his $300 million contract being so backloaded. Of those minimum-salaried players, George Springer, Miguel Sano, Mookie Betts, Stephen Piscotty, and Gregory Polanco represent a group that could find itself on the other end of the chart in a half-dozen years.
Left field looks fairly similar to right field.

Newly signed Justin Upton leads the group followed by an aging group that includes Jayson Werth, Ryan Braun, Andre Ethier, and Matt Holliday. Kyle Schwarber and Michael Conforto headline the group at the lower end of the pay scale.
Third basemen represent another drop in pay as their firepower is stuck in arbitration.

Of the top 13 third basemen by FanGraphs projected WAR, only two (Adrian Beltre and Evan Longoria) have more than six years of service time, which is depressing the value of many of these players, especially Manny Machado, Josh Donaldson, Kris Bryant, and Nolan Arenado, the top four third baseman by the projections.
The next three positions–catcher, second base, and center field–are all close together right around $5.6 million. First, catcher:

Catchers still have a handful of players making free agent money at the top, but the average salary is kept down by the bulk of players in the middle–half of the starting catchers will make between $2 million and $6 million for this season. Given the way catchers age, it is not surprising to see few large free agent contracts.
Center field salaries are kept down by the great number of players making the minimum this season.

While New York sets the market, nearly half of the teams are using young, athletic, pre-arbitration players while they are likely in the prime of their defensive careers. While Joc Pederson and Randal Grichuk might eventually have to move off center field, defense-first players like Kevin Kiermaier and Kevin Pillar are also in the same group.
Second base has Robinson Cano at the top, but looks a lot more like catcher, with a large mid-priced middle section.

Second base is not the lowest of all positions. That honor goes to shortstops, where the average starter salary for this season is under $5 million.

The top two players were traded for each other last season, and Colorado’s cost could come down depending on the outcome of Jose Reyes‘ domestic violence investigation. Shortstop is a young position, and younger positions do not get paid as much as veterans.
While first base pays roughly twice as much as the most important defensive positions when looking at all starters, the disparity is not as great at the top. If we looked at just the top 20% of salaries for position players, first base is at the top with $24 million, but the gap percentage-wise is not as great, with all of the other positions coming in between $14 million and $20 million. If those younger players making the minimum and going through arbitration are still playing at a high level when they reach free agency, they should have little problem cashing in.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
hmmm, seems like DH is highest-paid mostly because arb and pre-arb players are not slotted into the DH role… not sure you’d get the same result if you adjusted this analysis for FA versus arb versus pre-arb….
Seems like the hook of this article depends on Pujols and Santana being their teams primary DHs, but every official word and unofficial speculation has both of them as their teams primary 1B. What’s up with the FG depth charts?
I completely agree with troy. I’d love to see salary compared to age and position compared to age.
Great work, Craig! These charts are very helpful in understanding the distribution of pay. I think it’s interesting that each top-paid player for each position is on a different team. In other words, the Yankees or Angels or Dodgers aren’t paying the top salary for more than 1 position. Not sure if there’s additional commentary to make in there, but I find it interesting nonetheless.
well, I think the Angels are #1 in LF if you include Joshay and #1 at DH if that’s where he wants to put Pujols…
The Depth Charts have Cameron Rupp as barely Phillies’ starter at catcher, but you use Carlos Ruiz’s salary. Not positive who will really end up the starter, but it is an $8M difference.
Really interesting stuff, thanks Craig!
Not shocking that DH is tops with the list for 2016 starting with:
Pujols at $25 million
Prince at $24 Million
A-Rod at $21 Million
Victor Martinez at $18 Million
Ortiz at $16 Million
Nelson Cruz at $14 million
Yet another reason to shake my head at $10 million a year for Billy Butler…..
Meant to add something about the DH pool being a bit smaller, so like more than half the qualified players are making more than $10 million.
Of all of those players only 2 of them were paid “to be a DH” though. I think this article confuses that to some degree. No one would have given Pujols/A-Rod the contracts they got if they actually expected them to only be a DH by now.
…and Pujols isn’t the DH anyway. Santana isn’t either.
exactly — all of these players were at a different position earlier in their careers, pre-arb, arb…
all this article does is show that DHs tend to be older players who hit well enough to survive at DH and are therefore (a) running out contracts at higher AAVs than their current market value and (b) are exclusively on FA contracts.
I fundamentally disagree with the main conclusion / headline of this article.
I agree!
I do think that when they were given these contracts the ability to change positions, “take days off by DH’ing” and eventually become DH was likely a consideration. The rate at which many of them went from “sometimes take a break from the field” to full time DH is a big factor in evaluating the value in signing them.
This is one reason why I find the article so fascinating, the “position” that’s making the most is full of guys who were originally at other positions. This could be a pretty solid de facto argument for old school anti-dh type arguments.
Pujols agreed but Around is aging according to plan basically. I don’t think anyone actually believed he’d be playing third base in his age 41 season.
My new phone hasn’t been properly trained. It changed pujols to “upholstery” and Arod to”around”.
Doesn’t center field have a higher positional adjustment than third or second base? I’m not sure that this makes it more “difficult” however you want to define it. But excelling at center field as compared to league average is definitely a very difficult thing to do.
I am my own DH. This is why the Mets got a bargain.
For Bartolo Colon “DH” stands for “Dairy Hut” which is a number of items from Dairy Queens menu combined with a number of items from Pizza Hut’s menu. It’s part of his pre-game regimen.
You can’t leave out Queens Pizza. That’s one of the big perks of playing for the Mets.
Or Dairy Barn. He doesn’t even need to get out of the car! They’ll go get his snacks for him!
Since more athletic positions defensively tend towards youth, finding age as the major component probably isn’t surprising. But what if you statistically controlled for age as a factor: what would the salary differences look like then?
it’s more service time than age, but yea — this analysis is nowhere close to complete or representative of the reality of which position gets paid the most.
To what extent does the DH distribution change if you combine this analysis with that from your “Dead Money” article earlier this week? For example, Detroit is paying Victor Martinez $18 million this year to serve as their primary DH, and they’re also paying $6 million of the $24 million Prince Fielder is receiving to be Texas’ DH.
Do these sorts of “dead-money” apportionments disproportionately apply to certain positions?
I’m curious what the highest paid position would be if you compared apples to apples – e.g., all the 1st year players go in one bin, all the 2nd year in another, and so on.
It gets tricky b/c (a) the bins would all be different sizes, and some of them might be really lacking in positions – like how many first-year DH’s are there?, and (b) you’d have to figure out how to account for the problem of “survivors” – i.e., the bin that contains all players with 10 or more years of experience will be composed solely of players who are either really good or were really good in the past, which would skew the totals (like there’s no way to account for players who drop out of the league).
Thinking this through, it seems there’s no good way to determine which positions are the most valued in a vacuum. Something will always mar the data. But maybe someone smarter than me could figure it out.
I wonder what would happen if you looked not at where players play today, but where they were signed to play. We would get a better sense of how teams valued positions, rather than how teams coped with skill changes. 3rd base would look pretty good under that criteria.
The thing is teams place a higher value on offensive WAR than defensive WAR (fielding + position adjustment). Defensive players are in larger supply, the true scarcity is offense, so thats where the money goes. Many potential GG’ers never make it to the MLB because they can’t hit well enough. No great hitter ever misses the MLB because of his glove
I would think the formula is probably something like AAV = 7 x Offensive WAR + 1 x defensive WAR.
Many of the best hitters (15-20%) are also LH throwers and they are excluded from playing 4 of the 5 defensive positions with the greatest position adjustments. The bigger players who hit for power tend to be excluded from the OF and middle IF due to lack of speed, leaving them only 4 positions to play (C, 1B, 3B and DH), and many teams move the best hitting C to 1B. The WAR system with position adjustments as they are has a definite middle IF RH throwing bias
Anyways, point is, not all WAR is equal, and teams obviously pay more for the offense.
This statement doesn’t make any sense:
We know that defensive peaks occur earlier, which means it will be more difficult for a very good defensive shortstop to hit free agency near his peak, while a player who relies less on defense is more likely to be viewed as still in his peak when he hits his first payday.
Players who rely less on defense would still be expected to decline defensively just as players who rely more on defense. Players that accrue less of their value on defense don’t peak later defensively than players that accrue more of their value on defense. There shouldn’t be any reason why we would expect players that are less-inclined defensively to retain more of their total value when hitting free agency.
Why doesn’t it make sense? Andrelton Simmons derives most of his value from being a +25 defender at SS, but very little of it comes from his bat. The likelihood of him still being a + 25 defender when he reaches free agency after the 2020 season probably isn’t that high, rendering him a less valuable player overall. Contrast this with Bryce Harper, who has been below average defensively each of the past three seasons.
Curious how it would look if position were determined at the time the contract was signed. We would at least see Pujols and Arod removed from the DH group.
Not too many guys out there I would sign for big money knowing they have no defensive position, but many more I could stomach at 1B/DH for the final couple years of a deal that buys peak seasons.
It would be interesting to compare WAR ranking with salary ranking, position by position, to see how badly the higher paid players underperform their salary. By my admittedly rough count, of the top three salaries at each position, 13 out of 27 figure to be worth their 2016 salary. It will be interesting to see what this ratio looks like in a few seasons as the current generation of younger players reaches the higher paying seasons of their pre-Arab contract extensions.
I see a lot of owners offering pre-Arab contract extensions to recent rookies. With salary inflation, it really makes sense Dubai a couple of free-agent years at a reasonable cost.