DJ LeMahieu Is Back in the Bronx

The staredown is over, and the first of this winter’s top-tier free agents has signed. Per ESPN’s Jeff Passan, the Yankees are finalizing a six-year, $90 million deal to bring back DJ LeMahieu, who over the past two seasons has been one of the game’s top hitters and most valuable players.

That outcome — a surprise given his latter-day performances with the Rockies — has a whole lot to do with the way the now-32-year-old infielder adapted to the Bronx, to such an extent that “The Machine” likely has more value to the Yankees than to any other team. Even so, this is a comparatively reasonable deal that fits the Yankees well, as its lower average annual value will aid the team when it comes to the Competitive Balance Tax. At the same time, from a dollars-and-wins standpoint, it may not bode tremendously well for this winter’s other top free agents.

When the Yankees signed LeMahieu to a two-year, $24 million deal, he was coming off a tepid 91 wRC+ over the final two seasons of his seven-year run in Colorado. Even so, his glovework had boosted his value to 4.1 WAR in that span, giving him a reasonable floor, and our own Jeff Sullivan saw his high contact rate, right-handedness, ability to hit to the opposite field, and modest pop as reminiscent of one Derek Jeter. Due to a slew of injuries, the Yankees leaned upon LeMahieu more than most observers expected, and between his defensive versatility and indeed, his ability to go oppo with his fly balls — thereby taking advantage of Yankee Stadium’s short right field porch — he emerged as one of the toughest outs in the league.

LeMahieu, who had reached double digits in home runs just twice with the Rockies and topped out at 15 in 2018, hit a major league-high 16 opposite field homers at home in 2019-20 (out of 36 total) while continuing to pull enough groundballs hard enough to put up eye-opening numbers. After batting .327/.375/.518 (136 wRC+) with 5.4 WAR in 2019, he hit a sizzling .364/.421/.590 in ’20. His batting average in the latter season made him the first modern player to win batting titles in both leagues; Ed Delahanty won the NL in 1899, and the AL in 1902, his last full season before going over Niagara Falls.

Anyway, LeMahieu also led the AL in on-base percentage and wRC+ (177) as well while ranking fifth in WAR (2.5) and sixth in slugging percentage in 2020. Over his two years with the Yankees, he hit .366/.421/.642 (183 wRC+) at home compared to .309/.354/.439 (112 wRC+), so while it’s fair to call his performance something of a creation of Yankee Stadium, the good news for both sides in this deal is that he’ll be calling The House That George Built home for the next half-dozen seasons.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Via Dan Szymborski, here’s his ZiPS projection for those six years:

ZiPS Projection – DJ LeMahieu
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ DR WAR
2021 .305 .355 .456 557 93 170 27 3 17 73 43 80 6 117 7 4.2
2022 .300 .350 .448 516 83 155 25 3 15 66 39 72 6 113 6 3.5
2023 .297 .345 .440 489 77 145 22 3 14 61 35 65 5 110 4 3.0
2024 .291 .337 .424 460 69 134 19 3 12 55 31 59 4 104 3 2.3
2025 .285 .329 .404 428 61 122 17 2 10 48 27 51 4 97 2 1.6
2026 .278 .317 .382 395 53 110 13 2 8 41 22 43 3 88 0 0.9

That may be a conservative projection on the front end, in that LeMahieu has slugged .536 with the Yankees thus far while averaging 6.0 WAR per 150 games, but even if he can’t match that, this looks like a bargain for the team. Even without adjusting for inflation, that’s only $5.8 million per win above replacement. Of course, baseball salaries have been deflating in recent years, and on the heels of a shortened season with virtually no gate revenue in 2020 and only limited revenue on that front in ’21, our built-in assumptions about $8 million or $9 million per win need adjustment.

The back end of the deal, LeMahieu’s age-37 and 38 seasons, doesn’t look great, of course. In light of Yahoo Sports’ Tim Brown reporting that LeMahieu’s camp expected something in the vicinity of Josh Donaldson‘s four year, $92 million deal and J.D. Martinez’s five-year, $110 one, we might think of this one at four years and $90 million, with two complete freebies tacked on at the end. Szymborski told me that ZiPS’ contract estimate was for five years and $109 million, again, an AAV in the $22 million range. That’s well beyond the estimates of Craig Edwards (three years, $31 million) and our crowdsource median (three years, $42 million) from our Top 50 Free Agents list, where Edwards rated LeMahieu as this winter’s sixth most desirable free agent while wondering aloud:

Will bidding be pushed over $50 million when Cesar Hernandez and Jurickson Profar are available for a fraction of the cost? LeMahieu’s Statcast numbers weren’t as rosy as his results, with a drop in launch angle putting him more at the mercy of batted ball luck. On the other hand, Mike Moustakas received four years and $64 million a year ago and LeMahieu is better than Moustakas even if he’s a year older.

The Yankees obviously see LeMahieu differently, and did all along. Indeed, in mid-December, general manager Brian Cashman told reporters, “We’re working on it. I promise you that. He is this winter’s priority.” On Thursday, however, The Athletic’s Lindsey Adler characterized the situation as a stare down between the two sides, and earlier this week, Brown reported that LeMahieu had instructed his representatives to re-engage with the other teams that had pursued him or expressed interest previously this offseason, a list that included three that appeared serious (the Blue Jays, Dodgers, and Mets) and five others that at least kicked the tires (Astros, Braves, Cardinals, Nationals, and Red Sox). When I awoke Friday morning, I was set to finish off a roundup of how he would fit into those various lineups and what it might mean for the rest of their winter shopping. Instead, there was news — MLB’s Jon Morosi was first to report that a deal was approaching — and well, here we are.

LeMahieu is just the third of our top 13 free agents to sign, and the only one of the trio who wasn’t on the clock: Ha-seong Kim 김하성 signed with the Padres after being posted by the KBO’s Kiwoom Heroes, while Marcus Stroman accepted a qualifying offer from the Mets. The recent movement in the reliever market — Liam Hendriks, Blake Treinen, Pedro Báez, Archie Bradley, and Hansel Robles have all inked deals in the past 10 days — suggests that the action could pick up, but comparatively speaking, how could it not? The question for the likes of J.T. Realmuto, George Springer, Trevor Bauer et al is how much LeMahieu’s low AAV and cost per win tells us about the rest of the market.

By coming in with a $15 million AAV, LeMahieu does the Yankees a favor. Via RosterResource, their payroll for tax purposes is around $195 million, which leaves them just $15 million shy of the CBT threshold while still needing to bolster a rotation that has shed Masahiro Tanaka, J.A. Happ, and James Paxton in free agency. Their departures leave a comparatively untested bunch — Jordan Montgomery, Michael King, rookies Deivi García and Clarke Schmidt, and the recently reinstated Domingo Germán — behind Gerrit Cole, at least until Luis Severino returns from a February 2020 Tommy John surgery. If they’re to avoid going over $210 million, which is apparently the plan, they’d need to maneuver their roster to bring in more than one proven starter. An incentive-based deal for Paxton or Corey Kluber, both returning from significant injuries, might be the route they travel unless they can trade for a pre-arbitration or arbitration-eligible starter.

Lineup-wise, LeMahieu’s return effectively commits the Yankees to sticking with Gleyber Torres at shortstop, though his defensive work there thus far (-9.7 UZR, -12 DRS, -11 OAA in 1,132.1 innings) has been decidedly subpar. While LeMahieu could continue to fill in at third base and first base in addition to second, the Yankees have ample coverage at both positions assuming Gio Urshela rebounds from surgery to remove a bone chip from his right elbow, but affording a true shortstop — maybe Andrelton Simmons on a short-term deal as he rebounds from two injury-wracked seasons — while also fortifying the rotation probably isn’t doable without going past $210 million. Which, make no mistake, the Yankees can afford, but they’re choosing not to, and acting accordingly, which limits their options.

Still, that’s a problem for another day. The return of LeMahieu is a significant move for them, and should open the door to whatever other deals they have in store, free agent or trade, while also helping to thaw the free agent market in general. Now, can I interest you in an obsolete take on how “The Machine” would fit the lineups of the Dodgers, Mets, Blue Jays, Cardinals…?





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

56 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
5 years ago

So if you’re LA, would you rather re-sign Hernandez or Turner (if you had to choose)?

newhavenravens
5 years ago

This deal reminds me a bit of the Red Sox’ deal with Dustin Pedroia for 8/$110M. Both players seem to have left some money on the table, ostensibly to help their teams maintain financial flexibility (not unlike Brady taking less money all those years with the Pats).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  newhavenravens

If you can find me another team that would have given LeMahieu that money, I’d be curious to hear why you think that. I think this is probably the best he could do (which, also, is pretty good!).

bohknowsbmore
5 years ago
Reply to  newhavenravens

Brady also:
1) had high guarantees, which is a counterweight to total AAV in the NFL; and
2) had a disproportionate amount of his LT wellbeing (money, earning potential, legacy, etc.) tied to team success, relative to other athletes. Combined with a wife who can pull down $50M a year, leaving a few million on the table to increase chances at rings makes way more sense for him than Pedroia or DJ LaM

lmcgagin07
5 years ago

just curious here, if a team wants to stay under the $210 million mark, would setting up a contract with a very low AAV but packing it with incentives the player is certain to reach, work? For example, what if they instead gave DJ a 6 year, $30 million deal with a $10 million/year incentive for reaching 10 PA in each of those years? Would that work to manipulate the payroll to be lower than it actually is and help the Yankees have more flexibility?

CC AFCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  lmcgagin07

I believe the league maintains authority to override blatant tax manipulations. The league generally has quite a strong incentive to prevent that and I think that would be stopped quicker than you can say “whatever happened to John Coppollela?”

averagejoe15Member since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  lmcgagin07

No or else teams would obviously try and push for this contract structure

Contract incentives are not factored into the AAV of the contract, but they are included in the luxury tax calculation in any given year if they are reached.

So in your example, assuming the contract is evenly spread, DJM’s AAV for the contract would be $5M. But if he reaches 10 PA in any given season he would count for a full $15M against the lux tax for that season.

PC1970Member since 2024
5 years ago
Reply to  averagejoe15

The other issue with that is “Why would LeMahieu do that?” The potential pay out would have to be significantly greater than the guarantee he could get elsewhere to offset risk.

Even the easiest contract incentive in the world is impossible to hit if he tears his ACL or blows out his Achilles during spring training & misses the entire year.

martyvan90Member since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  lmcgagin07

Seems to me the tack on years will be the way to counter (at least short term) the soft cap and it’s implications.

theflusher
5 years ago

5 sub-100 wRC+ seasons. 5.

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  theflusher

My guess is that they’re betting that the last two years say more about what sort of player he is today than his stats from several years ago. [shrugs shoulders]

averagejoe15Member since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  theflusher

A player’s baseline can change drastically from one year to the next depending on the changes they make. I don’t care that Justin Turner, for example, was terrible with the Mets, he changed his baseline and increased his value. It’s not all that different from DJM. The main difference really is that DJM got plenty of play at the ML level even when he was a bad hitter.

Unless you’re just generally surprised he had 5 seasons below 100 and are not using it as a data point against DJ’s current talent level/contract, I don’t see how this is relevant.

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  theflusher

That’s after you include the Coors Field park factors. But it doesn’t seem like Coors Field actually helped him. I never question park factors, but in this case they seem to be getting in the way.

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago

Everyone gets a boost at Coors, but it appears we don’t give the Rockies players enough credit to how much Coors ruins their away statistics. I don’t anyway!

Left of Centerfield
5 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Except with DJ, most of his improvement has come at home.

Last two years with the Rockies he had a 94 road wRC+. First two years with teh Yankess it was 112.

Meanwhile his home wRC+ went from 106 to 183!

ScoreboardMember since 2016
5 years ago

The refusal to go over $210M seems incredibly short-sighted. This team is competing for a WS, their competitive window is NOW. They should be going all-in on Tanaka AND one of the other SP options (Kluber, Paxton, Bauer).

dl80Member since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Profit is king now in baseball. Everything else (fan support, championships, public perception) matters only so much at it supports that one goal.

tomerafan
5 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Profit has been king in baseball forever.

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

I think he means short term profits! Long term profits are affected by things like how easy it is to see games as a poor kid, and fan loyalty through generations. Those seem less important now than they appeared 50 years ago.

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Hopefully it’s a ploy. They could go into the season with a payroll of $225M. Lots of people would say “Thank God they didn’t actually stay under the first threshold” and not notice that the team just slashed payroll by over 10%.

tomerafan
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

You don’t fire all your bullets early. Starting the season over 210M makes it more costly to take on contracts during the season – and there will be sellers. It’s the smart move to keep some powder dry even if you’re willing to go over the Luxury Tax.

fjtorres
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

Especially when your core outfield has a history of injuries.

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Do Royal and Pirate fans have this discussion?

John ChurchMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Discussions about why the team isn’t spending more when they are in a competitive window? May I refer you to the 2015-16 Pirates offseason, wherein they traded Neil Walker and Charlie Morton, but did sign Ryan Vogelsong!

averagejoe15Member since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

The problem is that even teams who can afford to operate above the lux tax into the foreseeable future are now treating that figure as a soft cap. The argument being that the cap penalties essentially make signing players relatively more expensive for high payroll teams.

Think about a hypothetical cell phone plan where you pay $10/GB/Month up to 6GBs/Month.
Now once you hit 6GBs in a given month you can still use data, but you have to pay a prorated portion of $15/GB/Month for any data you use over 6GB. If you go over 6GB per month in multiple months the rate for additional data goes up until you eventually pay a prorated portion of $30/GB/Month.

Under this system you’re most likely going to try and stay under 6GB/Month where possible, though if you go slightly over for a month it may not be a big deal. But if you’re over for several consecutive months suddenly you are paying 3x the ‘value’ of the data.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

The goal for the Yankees and Dodgers (the Nationals, Red Sox, Giants, and Cubs were part of this club, probably not at the moment, Mets may join them someday) is to go over it for a couple of seasons, then reset. I think that is probably pretty reasonable, since at some point it starts moving back your first draft pick.

I don’t really mind this. I like competitive balance, and it’s better when the Dodgers and Yankees aren’t just buying absolutely everyone. If we want teams to spend more money, then we need to think about a better revenue sharing mechanism and higher minimum-salaried players / arbitration moving earlier so that other teams don’t have any excuses not to spend (and can’t get away with it).

ScoreboardMember since 2016
5 years ago

The elephant in the room is Stanton, who is taking up $30M worth of payroll on the team despite being somewhat replaceable by Clint Frazier. Although I’m a huge fan of Stanton when healthy, his presence has created a massive (self-inflicted) log-jam in terms of trying to staff this team under $210M.

MikeD
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

The Yankees personal capital when it comes to contracts is less about dollars than it is about AAV since they operate often in, on and above the luxury tax threshold. For them, Stanton’s AAV of $22M is key, not the approximate $30M in real dollars.

The Yankees aren’t constricted at all by any player’s salary. They’re constricted by being a slave to the luxury tax threshold. They broke through the $200M threshold level in 2005 with a payroll north of $220M. Sixteen years later they are shooting for a payroll of $210M. Their payroll has flatlined for over 15 years while inflation has increased, and player salaries, MLB’s revenue and the Yankees revenues and profits have skyrocketed. Their player payroll as a percent of revenue has cratered. More money for the Steinbrenner’s and all owners. Even though they are in a win-now window with their current group of players, they are opting to not maximize their roster. They are happy to play that game.

One can argue that’s good for the game as it allows other teams to compete. That to me is not the question. The question is why did the MLBPA allow for the introduction of a soft salary cap (call it what you want), but not demand a corresponding soft floor.

fjtorres
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

They allowed it because it reduced the money teams could spend in the draft and international signings. More money for the top FA…
…but since less for everybody

sbf21
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

Hal Steinbrenner claiming that the Yankees lost more money than any other team strikes me as disingenuous. How much money did he make thru his ownership of the YES network that does not go to the Yankees’ bottom line?

And just a sore point to me… The team made it extremely hard for season ticket holders to get a refund last year. They held on tight to their customers’ money for a disgracefully long time. Very low class move.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  sbf21

I am about a thousand percent convinced that the Astros lost more than any other team in baseball. That was a very well-paid roster and they do not get anywhere near as much money from TV as the Yankees (who also have it integrated with their team). I could buy that the Yankees were bottom five, maybe.

MikeD
5 years ago
Reply to  sbf21

What he’s saying is likely not incorrect, but he’s also not being transparent. A game of semantics. What does he mean by “lost more?” I think what he’s saying is the Yankees had a revenue projection for 2020 pre-pandemic and that got gutted. Since the Yankees reportedly make more money than any team, they therefore “lost” more money than any team based on their revenue projections. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they operated at a loss, although they certainly might have. In fairness, the Yankees make more money than any team based on fan attendance and concessions. They draw 3 million, their tickets are expensive, their parking is expensive, their concessions are expensive. A lot of money there never realized. That’s why the Yankees never collapsed when they did their rebuild, and I doubt they’ll collapse when this current window closes. They’ll look at ways to remain competitive so the turnstiles turn and YES can charge high advertising rates.

CliffH
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

Weren’t the Yankees the only team to vote against the luxury tax?

martyvan90Member since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Jacoby Ellsbury didn’t help…

ScoreboardMember since 2016
5 years ago

Surprised to see no Aaron Hicks reference here, since the Yankees structured his contract in the exact same way (add 1-2 years at the end, when he likely wouldn’t get much anyways to lower the AAV).

ScottyBMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

I was going to say the same thing (Hicks- 7 year $70M). The Yankees seem to like contracts that are longer but with lower AAV- which if I am thinking correctly, seems to go against the grain of what the industry has been doing (shorter, higher AAV contracts).

My crowdsource guess was something like 3/$60M

fjtorres
5 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Makes sense: if the players age well, fine and dandy.
If not, they eat the tail end or bundle them off with a prospect or two and only eat part.

Curacao LL
5 years ago

CBT aside, he’s entering his age-33 season and this is 4 years for $90MM with two club options at $0 per.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

This was written in the stars.

In 2019, these were his home/road splits for wRC+
Home: 157
Road: 116

For 2020 (small sample size warning):
Home: 256
Road: 98

Even if you just figure that players play better at home than on the road (which is potentially true), there is no other team where it would be wise to give LeMahieu that much money. Bu when you play half your games in Yankee stadium it makes a whole lot of sense! Sure, the back end won’t be as good but I can absolutely see him playing at home every game in the last couple of years, and on the road against lefties too, and still being a better choice at second base in those two situations.

0bsessions
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I feel like the biggest concern with this many years is that he’s a 32 year old middle infielder whose offense is heavily tied into contact. He doesn’t strike out much, but he also doesn’t walk much either. His skillset is not one you’d be expecting to carry him long past 34 and he’s signed until 39 now.

Chili Davis Eyes
5 years ago
Reply to  0bsessions

No one, including the Yankees, expects him to be good for the next six years. They’re counting on him being good for the next 3 years and spreading out the payments to stay under the luxury tax. If they have better infield options in 2024 they’ll use them.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

I very much agree with this. But also, he still might be a starting caliber player in that stadium and on the road against lefties, even if he’s not elite even against that select group. I think that in those last 3 years of the contract, you’re going to start seeing him enter that role (perhaps gradually, perhaps immediately and sharply). And that’s probably at least 400 PAs. You could do worse for your dead-money years (see: Pujols, Albert).

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If you look at his many home runs he would hit in other parks (28-10 last two years) would be 17-5 in other parks he was looking at. He hit very few no doubters…lots of those were fly balls to right field. Taking away 11 hrs makes a massive difference in his batting line. He is built for yankee stadium, other teams are aware of that too, his market was always basically the Yankees only.

tung_twista
5 years ago

Craig projected $31M/3 years, and the median crowdsource was $42M/3 years.
Therefore, DJ signing for $90M/6 years is a sign that does not bode well for top free agents.
Makes total sense.

When the facts change, I change my mind.
What do you do, sir?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Who do you see saying that? To me, this is very consistent with him being notably better than Moustakas (who was a clear overpay, anyway) but having his salary depressed by questions about how his bat will play outside of Yankee Stadium and the QO.

I would have said he would have gotten something close to the crowdsource because I thought it was going to be free agent armageddon for everyone not named Bauer or Springer or Realmuto. But this is one more piece of evidence that while the free agent market might not work out for everyone, that this is far from the free agent armageddon that I thought was going to happen. This is probably not that different from what we would expect him to get in a normal year.

DBA455
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think he is making a joke at the author’s expense.

DJ signed for a higher AAV *and* more years than Craig or the crowd predicted.

But the relentless party line at the current iteration of fangraphs is that the sky is falling and greedy owners are abusing fans and players.

The facts don’t bear this out here. But the narrative was set ahead of time (and the forecasts now have to be retconned to be enormously conservative).

Taking the depth charts (steamer) projections and assuming a 0.5 war/year decline (which might be generous given that the first year of the deal is effectively an age-33 season) gets you to about $90M/12 war. Which sounds … about right?

Dave from DCMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

FWIW, Kiley McDaniel, now at ESPN, predicted 4 years, $88 million.

DarPoeta34Member since 2016
5 years ago

Let’s focus on that Delahanty article for a second:

“he reached into another [train] berth and tried to pull out a female passenger by her ankles”
“I don’t care whether I’m in Canada or dead”
“chased a teammate through a hotel while brandishing a knife”
“a posse of trainmen”

What a read!

RobM
5 years ago
Reply to  DarPoeta34

I want a movie about Delahanty’s life, even with the unhappy ending. Screw that. A Netflix miniseries!

martyvan90Member since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  DarPoeta34

I was fascinated when I read the article as well. I wondered immediately how it would have played today… then later in the story the author states the widow did get something from the railroad. It would make a great period piece movie. I’m sure a narrative would be weaved in… but it sounds like a great opportunity.

sbf21
5 years ago

I have to say that when I heard that DJ signed for $90 million I thought he got a bit more than I expected… for a 4 year deal. For 6 years it’s a gift to the team.

Jon
5 years ago
Reply to  sbf21

Not that big a gift – what do you really think he’ll be worth in years 5 and 6?

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago

Yankees are back on top in the AL on paper. Still probably behind the Padres, Dodgers, and maybe even the Mets! i’ll bet adding the Mets gets me many downvotes

RobM
5 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

I think it’s fair based on the Mets pitching rotation.

fjtorres
5 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Adding Kluber might, *if* he’s recovered.
Big if, though.
They think he is and are giving him an $11M deal.

Jon
5 years ago

How on earth could anyone project a 3 year/$31M contract for him? He does what he did in 2019-2020 and then takes a pay cut??

If offered that deal, every single team would sign him at that price, and would be rushing to sign the contract before DJ’s agent sobered up.