Do Better Players Have More Twitter Followers?

I was reading R.J. Anderson’s recent article on Jason Heyward and Twitter when this question struck me. Obviously better players tend to be more popular, but Twitter offers access to a player’s thoughts, the quality of which might be independent of a player’s ability on the field. So there is at least the possibility that the best players might not have the most popular Twitter accounts.

Here I use FAN projected WAR as a measure of ‘how good’ a player is and compare that to his number of Twitter followers. The number of followers is on a log scale to accommodate the huge range in number of followers (under a thousand to over a million). Players with less than 15 fan projections were left out except for Jason Heyward, whom I just could not leave out. For him I used his current 2.1 WAR plus his CHONE projected rest of the season 1.6 WAR. I got the list of MLB players with Twitter accounts here.

First off the clear outlier is Nick Swisher (@NickSwisher). He has over 1.2 million followers, while his teammate CC Sabathia (@CC_Sabathia) is a distance second with just over 50 thousand followers. Ignoring how Swisher got so many followers, there is a slight trend for better players to have more followers — the linear relationship between projected WAR and log(followers) has a p value of 0.07 and an r-squared of 0.08, and on average each additional win results in 1.25 times more followers. This linear relationship between projected WAR and log(followers) is an exponential relationship between projected WAR and actual number of followers

With Swisher removed there is enough room to plot the remaining players identified by their Twitter account names.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Here it looks more like the lower limit of number of followers is determined by a player’s projected WAR and then there is considerable variation above that limit. For example, David Ortiz (@davidortiz), Carlos Delgado (@carlosdelgado21), and C.J. Wilson (@str8edgeracer) are low projected WAR players with lots of followers. Ortiz and Delgado probably because they both have long histories as very good players and Wilson because he has a particularly active and interesting twitter account.

So there is a weak trend towards better players having more followers with considerable variation based on small market/big market, the player’s history, the quality and quantity of his tweets and any number of other things.





Dave Allen's other baseball work can be found at Baseball Analysts.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Andy S.
16 years ago

Now do it for managers!

M Li
16 years ago
Reply to  Andy S.

which manager(s) have twitter accounts??

23553Member since 2020
16 years ago

What is the line of best fit + correlation?

Brandon
16 years ago

lol I love this. Just yet another reason why Fangraphs is the best website on the internet. Where else can you get this kind of hard hitting twitter analysis?

Shaggychild
16 years ago
Reply to  Brandon

Agreed! This is Fangraphs at its nerdiest/best.

Can we next find some way to quantify high school popularity? What sort of UZR equivalent can we uncover?

syh
16 years ago

We need some kind of True Twitter Talent statistic to really take this to The Next Level™

LMack
16 years ago

Why Nick Swisher?

BobLoblaw
16 years ago
Reply to  LMack

Yeah, how DID he get that many?

frtk
16 years ago
Reply to  BobLoblaw

Everybody loves Swisher!

Resolution
16 years ago
Reply to  LMack

He’s the man, plain and simple.

Bob Dylan
16 years ago

why isnt there a leaderboard for this on the site?!?! this is an outrage!!!!

RonDom
16 years ago

I’m gonna take a shot and say manbearwolf is Randy Wolf and if so… that’s pretty awesome.

spindoctor
16 years ago
Reply to  RonDom

manbearwolf is John Baker

spindoctor
16 years ago

*clap*

PJ
16 years ago

I started reading this thinking you were just joking around, then I couldn’t tell… What is it? Are you serious or is this uber-sabermetric satire?

jw
16 years ago

@TheGarfoose!!!

DKulich44
16 years ago
Reply to  Dave Allen

And one bestseller!

number 5
16 years ago

total nerd win

have you tried doing career WAR instead of projected WAR? Ortiz and Delgado are both players who’ve had their glory days. They’re household names because of some amazing years they’ve had in the past, regardless of where they are today.

frtk
16 years ago

You forgot ARod (@IAmCentaur) 😉

xeifrank
16 years ago

Did adjust for park?

Jason B
16 years ago

Subscribed to Dexter Fowler’s feed for a while, but it just got depressing:

“0 for 4 today. 2 K’s.”
“0 for 4 again. ONLY 1 K THO!”
“0 for 4. Skip gonna give me a day off.”
“One day off turned into six. Week’s vacay!”
“0 for 3 with a walk!! AWWWW YEA!!!1!”
“0 for 4, GIDP. I hear Colorado Springs is nice.”

Auckland Backpackers
15 years ago

haha … the one who is posting the comments 😀