Dollar Days: Adam Everett Returns to the Tigers

I imagine it isn’t unique to my fantasy league, but in our auction, the last part of the draft is known as “dollar days,” that is, when owners are almost out of fantasy dollars and the players being drafted are mostly filler, and thus go for one dollar. Of course, an owner or two usually spends a lot in the first part of the draft, puts himself in “dollar days” right away, and ends up waiting around to fill his roster.

In “real” baseball, the Detroit Tigers have clearly been in dollars days since the the last out of the season. This isn’t a criticism or a compliment — it’s a fact. Continuing their belt-tightening ways, the Tigers re-signed Adam Everett to a one-year deal reportedly worth $1.55 million according to Ken Rosenthal.

Everett is legendarily bad at the plate. His career wOBA is .286, peaking with the unforgettable dream season in 2004 when he hit .273/.317/.385 for a .313 wOBA. For 2010, CHONE projects Everett to hit .236/.292/.329, or 29 runs below average per 150 games. My projection is more optimistic: .240/.294/.342, or -25 runs per 150 games.

Of course, that’s not the whole story with Adam Everett. As bad as he’s been at the plate during his career, he’s been just as awesome with the glove, good enough to be an average player or better for most of the early part of the decade. Age and injuries have robbed him of some of his skill in the field, but he was still able to put up a 13.6 UZR/150 in 2009. Rally’s TotalZone projection has him at +12/150 for 2010, as do Jeff Zimmerman’s UZR projections. Adding it all together, per 150 games we get -27 offense, +12 defense, +7 positional adjustment for shortstop per 150, +20 replacement, and Everett projects as a bit over 1 WAR per 150 games.

Keep in mind that Everett hasn’t actually played in 150 games since 2006. Still, he was able to put up about 1 WAR in only 118 2009 games. Having a 1 WAR player as an everyday starter isn’t exactly a recipe for a divisional championship, but the Tigers came awfully close to winning the dreadful AL Central with Everett at shortstop for most of 2009. More importantly, with the Tigers in a severe budget crunch and currently without other decent shortstop options at the major league level, by signing Everett for $1.5 million in a market when a marginal win is going for around four million, the Tigers can at least be respectable at the position while staying within their budgetary limits. Frankly, one could argue that with Marco Scutaro off the table and Miguel Tejada out of their price range (and perhaps headed to third base anyway), Everett is as good or better than any of the remaining free agent shortstops out there such as Khalil Greene, Bobby Crosby, and Orlando Cabrera. This is a good deal for a team who started the auction in dollar days.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Matt Klaassen reads and writes obituaries in the Greater Toronto Area. If you can't get enough of him, follow him on Twitter.

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Joel
16 years ago

.240/.204/.342?

That’s quite a lot of sac bunts and sac flies slotted in there somewhere.

gnomezMember since 2020
16 years ago

Why? Why? Couldn’t Will Rhymes fill in at second and even move Polanco back to short? I’m sure he would’ve been well above average. Is there anyone outside Detroit management who thinks Sizemore is ready?

Mike Rogers
16 years ago
Reply to  gnomez

Because Will Rhymes projects to -24 runs per 150 with the bat and another -4 per 150 on defense (per CHONE).

http://baseballprojection.com/2010/DET2010.htm

I’m glad I got basically the same projection at my blog.

Nick
16 years ago
Reply to  gnomez

Polanco has never played short for a significant amount of time, so that would have been a ridiculous idea.

And yes, most people think that Sizemore is a major league ready player. Sure as hell more than Will Rhymes.

gnomezMember since 2020
16 years ago
Reply to  Nick

Last year Sizemore was helped by a ridiculously high BABIP as much as Rhymes was hurt by a low one. I will concede Sizemore is the better defender, but Rhymes has had a better BB/K ratio over his career and a surprisingly small Speed Score difference from Sizemore. Sizemore has higher upside, but right now they’re not too different.

David MVP Eckstein
16 years ago

This is a very good signing for the Tigers. Everett provided them with a lot of defensive value (almost 1/3 of the team’s non-negative defense) and with Polanco gone and Mags/guillen staying in the field, the tigers need all the defense they can find.

As I point out in the name link, Porcello’s 2010 fantasy relevance hinges upon the Tigers infield.

JoeR43
16 years ago

It’s a good sign.
& It’s not like the Tigers couldn’t make a trade if the opportunity arises at the deadline. If Renteria bounces back a bit, he could be worth bringing in around that time, since I doubt you would need to give up much (assuming the Giants are out of contention, it would only cost about $3,500,000 in salary).

my dummy site testing for you
14 years ago

Hi there, is good to be here. Found exactly what I was looking for. Thank you!