Eddie Butler Then, Now, and in the Future
Yesterday, the Colorado Rockies traded right-hander Eddie Butler to the Chicago Cubs in exchange for a modestly promising relief prospect (James Farris) and the 28th international bonus slot.
Even as recently as last year, the notion of such a move would have seemed improbable. Butler appeared twice — as recently as 2015 — on Baseball America’s top-100 prospects list. The Rockies’ rotation, meanwhile, has been quite poor, producing the second-lowest collective WAR in the majors over the last five years. They haven’t been a club, in other words, that had the luxury of giving up on a promising young pitcher.
But Colorado’s rotation has improved rapidly, while Butler’s stock has declined just as quickly. In the end, general manager Jeff Bridich concluded there wasn’t space on the roster for Eddie Butler. He made a deal.
But this isn’t just a late-January transaction that ought to be forgotten. Because Butler has shown promise. Let’s instead follow his story up to this point. He deserves it after toiling in Coors for so long, and it might provide us a glimpse of his future.
The Virginia native was originally selected out of high school by the Texas Rangers — in the 35th round — in 2009, but he didn’t sign. He appeared on the national scene more forcefully after some time playing at Radford University for the Highlanders. True to form — there can be only one, after all — Butler was drafted in the first round and signed for $1 million with the Rockies.
He tore through the minors on the back of 97 mph gas and a devastating changeup. By the end of second year in the organization, he was in Double-A with an ERA under one. I want to point out the changeup, though. This changeup.

That’s a beautiful righty-on-righty changeup with devastating fade and drop from the 2013 Futures Game. We should remember those times, and that changeup, because it was sometime in 2014 that things began to go wrong. Maybe it was altitude, maybe it was too much of a focus on contact, but even his mid-3.00s ERA in Double-A in 2014 showed signs of trouble. His strikeout rate was gone, at least.
Then began the fits and starts that led to Butler’s current major-league record: 159.1 innings of an ERA over 6.00 on the back of poor strikeout rates and middling walk rates and very large home-run rates. It was sometime in that three-year period that I talked to Adam Ottavino, who pointed out that Butler just needed to find one more pitch to make it all work. Because of that changeup. And that velocity.
Something weird happened along the way, though. It can probably be most expressed in one easy table. Here is how often Butler has used his non-fastballs over the last three years.
| Changeup | Slider | Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 22% | 13% | 1% |
| 2015 | 15% | 14% | 6% |
| 2016 | 6% | 26% | 8% |
The results of each pitch tell the same story.
| Changeup | Slider | Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 9.3% | 9.4% | 0.0% |
| 2015 | 7.7% | 13.7% | 6.8% |
| 2016 | 6.8% | 14.3% | 8.4% |
He found a new pitch! He lost the old pitch.
It looks like mechanics might tell some of the story. Butler used to release from a lower angle and get more drop on his changeup. Except that we’re comparing a few pitches in a Futures Game in 2013 to the rest of his career, which has been more over the top and with less drop. Let’s look at a 2016 delivery, and compare it to above, to see if it’s obvious that he’s changed his mechanics.
The release point looks higher here, and the changeup certainly doesn’t look the same. It’s fair to wonder if he can get it back, because the movement on it now only works if he pairs it with the four-seam. The change only has about an inch and a half more drop than the sinker, less fade, and only 6 mph of velocity gap. As he’s increased his sinker usage, he’s had fewer opportunities to pair the change with the four-seam, and the pitch hasn’t worked as well.
The good news is that he’s begun to harness the slider — it’s gone for a ball less and less often every year — and the highlights for that pitch are all over his MLB.com video page.
That’s a good pitch. He’s still throwing 93. The sinker has decent outcomes (55% grounders, 5% whiffs, both above average). He’s found a slider. That’s the now for Eddie Butler, and it’s more exciting than his results were last year.
The future? If it works out for him, and for the Cubs, who could use starting-pitching depth behind the six they’ll have in the majors, it’ll have more to do with his past than his present. He’ll find that changeup again, and he’ll find that promise that once made him a first-round pick and a Futures Game GIF monster.
With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.
When I heard the Cubs picked him up, I imagined Epstein was salivating over what was practically a free reclamation project. It’ll be tough to crack the starting rotation, but perhaps if he gets a year or so of sorting things out with a change of scenery, maybe Butler will surprise. Can’t fathom a 6+ ERA getting too much worse.
Chris Bosio to the rescue!
Good god that is hard swing by Joc.
Having watched him repeatedly the last couple years, I can tell you that slider to Pederson is completely cherry-picked. He threw no more than a handful of sliders that good all year. I personally think he’s basically done. He’ll hang around for a couple years then start signing minor league deals, and then that’s it. The shoulder injury in ’14 robbed him of a crucial 2-3 mph, which made his change-up less effective, which forced him to try and develop that slider. But it’s just not good enough and he’s 26 and out of options after this year. Rockies did well here.
Completely agree. I looked quickly at the pitching leaderboards for 2014-2016 with 150 IP min. In terms of “reverse standings,” Eddie comes in 1st in most of the basic stats like ERA and BA against. His peripherals aren’t much better, as he is 1st in FIP and K/BB, 3rd in SIERRA, 5th in HR/9, and 9th in xFIP. Accounting for Coors and looking at park-adjusted stats, he is 2nd in FIP-, 6th in xFIP-, and 8th in ERA-.
You can keep reaching for silver linings, but they aren’t there. As you noted, his velocity is significantly down, which probably explains most of this. He hasn’t even been able to handle AAA recently, posting a 3.54 K/9 in Albuquerque last year.
I would absolutely love to see him achieve some success and will definitely be rooting for it to happen. But there is no way to paint this as a pretty picture.
I think if you’re looking at those stats you’ll never find a readily available pitcher. If they have good FIP or SIERA or K9, their team values them.
Changeup looks like he completely changed the grip, it doesn’t look the same in movement numbers either. I don’t think it’s all fastball velo. At 93+ he’s still above average there.
As for the slider, in sum it was a good pitch. Above-average but not elite. So yeah, that GIF was a good one, but he threw a lot of good ones, considering he threw it more than a quarter of the time and got 14% whiffs.
Maybe… But there must be something more going on there than meets the ‘stat’ eye that Theo/Jed sees.
Baltimore gave up on Jake Arrieta also.
In 2012, Arrieta had an xFIP of 3.65. He was still worth 1.6 wins. He had an inflated BABIP of .320 and an inflated HR/FB of almost 15%. His K/9 was more than double what Butler put up last season in AAA.
These two stories are very, very different.