Eight Factors That Decided the 2018 World Series
In Game Five of the World Series on Sunday night, behind a stifling seven-inning, three-hit effort from David Price — on three days of rest, even — and a pair of home runs by Steve Pearce, the Red Sox completed their dismantling of the Dodgers with a 5-1 victory and a four-games-to-one Series win. Like the other games in the series, this one was close for a while. Ultimately, though, the Red Sox pulled away late, with the Dodgers unable to produce a run beyond David Freese’s leadoff homer in the bottom of the first inning. On top of their franchise-record 108 wins, the Red Sox went 11-3 in the postseason, losing just one game in each round of the playoffs. They’ll take their place among the most dominant championship teams of recent vintage, and have a claim as the best in franchise history.
To these eyes, the World Series turned on eight factors, areas that set the Red Sox apart from the Dodgers in what was, at times, a fairly close series that will nonetheless look rather lopsided in the history books.
Two-Out Damage
Continuing what they did against the Astros in the ALCS, the Red Sox scored the majority of their runs against the Dodgers with two outs. In fact, the totals and rates in the two rounds match up almost exactly: 18 out of 29 runs scored against Houston (62.0%) and 18 of 28 against Los Angeles (64.3%). In the World Series they hit .242/.347/.484 in 72 plate appearances with two outs and put up video-game numbers — .471/.609/.882 in 23 PA — with two outs and runners in scoring position. Their OPS in that latter situation set a World Series record:
| Rk | Team | Season | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Red Sox | 2018 | 23 | .471 | .609 | .882 | 1.491 |
| 2 | Giants | 2010 | 23 | .421 | .522 | .895 | 1.416 |
| 3 | Red Sox | 2007 | 33 | .391 | .576 | .652 | 1.228 |
| 4 | Orioles | 1970 | 27 | .458 | .519 | .708 | 1.227 |
| 5 | Yankees | 1951 | 26 | .350 | .500 | .700 | 1.200 |
| 6 | Dodgers | 1956 | 25 | .316 | .480 | .684 | 1.164 |
| 7 | Yankees | 1956 | 21 | .278 | .381 | .778 | 1.159 |
| 8 | Reds | 1975 | 40 | .333 | .450 | .697 | 1.147 |
| 9 | Dodgers | 1978 | 20 | .316 | .350 | .789 | 1.139 |
| 10 | Athletics | 1989 | 28 | .350 | .536 | .600 | 1.136 |
As Craig Edwards noted in his examination of the phenomenon, teams typically score about 37% of their runs with two outs, but for the entire postseason, 45 of Boston’s 84 runs (53.6%) scored in that context. Boston’s 18 two-out runs ranks third in World Series history behind only the 1982 Brewers’ 20 (out of 33) and 1997 Indians’ 21 (out of 44). It wasn’t enough for either of those teams, who lost seven-game series.
If you’re wondering about the Dodgers, they hit a dreadful .172/.274/.297 in 73 PA with two outs, scoring six of their 16 runs. They were a bit better with two outs and runners in scoring position (.231/.231/.462 with five runs in 13 PA), but it wasn’t enough.
A Bridge Too Far
Besides the Red Sox’ relentlessness with two outs, nothing typified this World Series as much as Dave Roberts trying to squeeze extra outs out of his flagging starters, with dreadful, series-turning results.
- Game One: With the Dodgers having just tied the game at 3-3 and chasing a tiring Chris Sale, Roberts let Kershaw start the fifth inning, facing Mookie Betts and Andrew Benintendi for the third time. The former walked, the latter singled, Kershaw departed without recording an out, and both runners came around to score once Ryan Madson entered the game.
- Game Two: With a 2-1 lead in the fifth inning, Hyun-Jin Ryu got two quick outs on a total of three pitches, then gave up singles to No. 9 hitter Christian Vazquez and then Betts. He was allowed to stay in to face Benintendi, whom he walked, and all three runners scored on Madson’s watch.
- Game Five: With Kershaw already having served up a solo homer to Betts to extend the Red Sox’s lead to 3-1 in the sixth, Roberts let him return for the seventh, when he allowed a leadoff homer to J.D. Martinez.And while he was able to prevent any further scoring, the hole out of which the Dodgers had to climb — and the margin with which Price thus had to work — was that much bigger. The Dodgers never even got the tying run to the plate after Betts’ dinger.
This isn’t about pitch counts so much as it is a slow hook with a pitcher slipping into trouble during his third time through the order. Certainly, it was exacerbated by the Dodger bullpen’s performance, which was at its worst in Game Three after Roberts did pull Rich Hill too early for some tastes; having criticized the manager in multiple contexts previously, I was OK with that move at the time while acknowledging that, given how gassed the bullpen was after the 18-inning epic Game Three, he would have been justified in riding Hill further.
In all, Dodger relievers combined for a 5.40 ERA and 5.96 FIP in 25 innings, not to mention the seven inherited runners whom Madson allowed to score. Time after time, it just felt like the L.A. skipper was a move or two behind counterpart Alex Cora.
No Bounceback
As I noted in the midst of Boston’s seemingly endless late-inning rallies in Game Four, every pitcher in that contest who had also thrown least 12 pitches in Game Three allowed at last one run except for the Red Sox’ Matt Barnes, who pitched a third of an inning. Joe Kelly, who threw only 12 pitches in Game Three, was the only one of nine relievers to emerge unscathed; even Craig Kimbrel, who had strung together four scoreless outings after apparently solving his pitch-tipping issues, gave up two runs.
What’s more, the six Dodgers relievers who pitched in Games Three and Four combined to set an unenviable record. Previously, the most pitchers on one team in a single World Series who allowed runs while pitching on zero days of rest (i.e. the day or night before) was four — and that’s for an entire series! Four teams had done that — namely the 1991 Twins, 2010 Rangers, 2015 Mets, and 2017 Dodgers — with Kenley Jansen and Brandon Morrow both giving up runs in Game Two (after pitching Game One) and Game Five (after pitching Game Four) last year against the Astros.
Blown Away
Jansen, whose 2018 struggles both on and off the field — the latter concerning yet another episode of an irregular heartbeat, which will require surgery next month — have been well documented, joined some unenviable company when he blew back-to-back saves by allowing game-tying homers to Jackie Bradley Jr. and Pearce in Games Three and Four, respectively. Three other pitchers have blown back-to-back save chances in a single World Series: the Phillies’ Mitch Williams in 1993 against the Blue Jays (Games Four and Six), the Diamondbacks’ Byung-Hyun Kim in 2001 against the Yankees (Games Four and Five), and the Mets’ Jeurys Familia in 2015 against the Royals (Games Four and Five). While the Dodgers were able to get Jansen off the hook, albeit by gassing their bullpen, in that 18-inning marathon, all of those closers’ teams save for the Diamondbacks eventually lost the World Series.
Starters in Relief
As in the first two rounds, the Red Sox were able to augment their bullpen with stray innings from their starters, generally on their throw days. Price pitched two-thirds of a scoreless inning in Game Three in addition to starting Games Two and Five; for my money, he should have been the MVP on the basis of his 13.2 innings of work, with three runs allowed, instead of Pearce, who didn’t even collect his first hit until Game Four. Eduardo Rodriguez got one out apiece in Games One and Three and then went six-plus innings as the emergency starter in Game Four. Nathan Eovaldi, who was scheduled to start that game, pitched perfect innings in Games One and Two before his heroic six-inning effort in Game Three that, alas, ended when he served up a walkoff homer to Max Muncy. And of course Game One starter Chris Sale closed out Game Five by striking out the side, clinching the title by getting Manny Machado to chase a slider:
In all, that’s 10.1 innings of one-run relief from pitchers who also started for the Sox in the playoffs, part of a unit that produced a 1.40 ERA and 2.81 FIP in 25.2 innings in the World Series.
The Dodgers, who got key innings from Hill and Kershaw out of the bullpen in the NLCS, didn’t try the gambit at all in the World Series; meanwhile, converted starters Kenta Maeda and Alex Wood, who combined for 47 regular-season starts for the Dodgers, allowed three runs in 5.1 innings in the World Series. The former, who was so dominant in a relief role during the Dodgers’ 2017 run (nine appearances, 10 innings, one run allowed, 10 strikeouts), often serving as the bridge to the rest of the bullpen, simply wasn’t the same this October, allowing three runs (and three inherited runners) in 6.2 innings over eight appearances and seemingly never garnering the same trust from Roberts.
Pinch-Hitting
In the 114 World Series that have been played, there have been just 25 pinch-hit home runs. Just six of those have been three-run homers, and two were hit by the Red Sox in this series. Eduardo Nunez‘s three-run shot off over Fenway Park’s Green Monster off Wood sealed Game One for Boston; prior to that, you’d have to go back to Game Three of the 1989 World Series, when the Giants’ Bill Bathe went deep against the A’s Gene Nelson, for the last such pinch blast. Yet just four nights later, in Game Four, Mitch Moreland’s three-run homer off Madson cut into the Dodgers’ 4-0 lead, the first three of nine unanswered runs that helped put the Sox within one win of a championship.
In all, Red Sox pinch-hitters went 3-for-10 with a walk, two homers and seven RBI; the other hit was merely Rafael Devers‘ go-ahead single off Dylan Floro in the ninth inning of Game Four. Dodger pinch-hitters, on the other hand, were a dismal 1-for-15 with a walk and no RBI.
Kershaw’s Slider
There’s no getting around the struggles of the 30-year-old, three-time Cy Young-winning southpaw, who was poised to change the script when it came to his spotty, over-scrutinized body of postseason work with two strong starts out of three in the first two rounds, not to mention his closeout of the Brewers in Game Seven of the NLCS. Instead, he was roughed up for nine runs in 11 innings over the course of his two starts, and now the question of what he has to do to win the big one — and whether he’ll do it in Los Angeles — will linger.
Despite the declining velocity of his fastball, Kershaw’s slider was a devastating weapon during the regular season. Batters hit .185/.224/.296 for a 49 wRC+ against it, though his swinging-strike rate on the pitch dropped from 24.4% in 2017 — his seventh straight year above 21% — to a career-low 13.9% this year. Nonetheless, according to Baseball Savant, he didn’t have a single start during the regular season in which he gave up more than four hits on his slider. In Game One, however, he surrendered five — and three of the four runs he allowed scored on those hits. He gave up just two hits on the slider in Game Five, one on the first-inning Benintendi single that preceded Pearce’s homer and the other on Betts’s sixth-inning homer. In the two games combined, he netted just six swings and misses on 65 sliders thrown, a 9.2% rate.
Price’s Changeup
The changeup has generally been a reliable pitch throughout the 33-year-old southpaw’s career, with batters hitting just .234/.261/.354 (79 wRC+) against it while swinging and missing 16.9% of the time. Price took his whiff rate to 18.6% this year, but batters tagged at a .276/.310/.417 (107 wRC+) clip. He rediscovered the pitch during the ALCS, getting 12 swings and misses from among a season-high 39 changeups in the Game Five clincher.
Price was more conservative with the pitch in his World Series Game Two start, getting four swings and misses from among his 25 changeups, but he went back to it as a weapon in Game Five, netting nine swings and misses plus five called strikes from among 23 thrown. The Dodgers didn’t put a single one of his changeups into play.
With their respective performances in this series, Price lowered his career postseason ERA from the second-highest to the third-highest among pitchers with at least 60 innings, while Kershaw climbed from the eighth-highest to the fifth-highest:
| RK | Player | Yrs | IP | HR/9 | BB/9 | SO/9 | ERA | FIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tim Wakefield | 1992-2008 (9) | 72.0 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 6.8 | 6.75 | 5.63 |
| 2 | Al Leiter | 1993-2005 (5) | 81.2 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 4.63 | 4.29 |
| 3 | David Price | 2008-2018 (9) | 99.1 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 8.2 | 4.62 | 4.31 |
| 4 | Charles Nagy | 1995-1999(5) | 84.2 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 4.46 | 5.11 |
| 5 | Clayton Kershaw | 2008-2018 (8) | 152.0 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 9.8 | 4.32 | 3.78 |
| 6t | Vida Blue | 1971-1975 (5) | 64.2 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 6.5 | 4.31 | 4.02 |
| 6t | CC Sabathia | 2001-2018 (9) | 129.1 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 8.4 | 4.31 | 4.30 |
| 8 | Kevin Brown | 1997-2004 (3) | 81.2 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 7.8 | 4.19 | 3.87 |
| 9 | Matt Morris | 2000-2005 (5) | 73.1 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 4.05 | 4.99 |
| 10 | Zack Greinke | 2011-2017 (5) | 67.0 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 7.9 | 4.03 | 3.86 |
| 11 | Livan Hernandez | 1997-2007 (4) | 68.0 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 6.2 | 3.97 | 4.55 |
| 12 | Andy Pettitte | 1995-2012 (14) | 276.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 3.81 | 4.16 |
| 13 | Jack Morris | 1984-1992 (4) | 92.1 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 3.80 | 4.12 |
| 14 | David Cone | 1988-2000 (8) | 111.1 | 1.0 | 4.7 | 7.6 | 3.80 | 4.48 |
| 15 | Don Gullett | 1970-1977 (6) | 93.0 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 5.8 | 3.77 | 3.83 |
As I noted after the ALCS clincher, Price’s performance proves that “Hasn’t pitched well in the postseason” isn’t the same as “can’t pitch well in the postseason,” and while Kershaw himself has shown that with some stellar starts over the years, ultimately, he’ll have to endure another year of questions as to whether he can ever win the big one.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
I think there’s room to debate how much Ryan Madson’s fault this all was, but: Ryan Madson. It’s not super-easy to have that many bad things happen in 2.1 innings.
I came here to say this. Madson was ungodly in the Series and I’m really really hoping for an all Madson-article again.
I wouldn’t mind a little more consideration of what happened to Wood and Maeda as well, because as best I can construct my guess about what Dave Roberts was thinking, it was him or them. I have a creeping suspicion that one of the Dodgers’ biggest behind-the-scenes failings in this postseason was not giving their relievers enough time to get warm, and I think that applied to both of the converted starters even more than Madson (who already said he entered at least one of those disastrous outings before he was really warm). In the Game 3 marathon you could actually see Maeda settling into good form, live, after looking like a mess to his first two batters.
Let’s not give Madson all the blame. Roberts kept on bringing him in in high-leverage situations. Madson didn’t force him to do that.
Didnt the D-back win the WS in 2001?
in my alternate reality, the Yankees won.
(I kid, I kid. Blame me for writing this at 1:30 AM and not checking it closely in the morning. David Price is better on short rest than I am.)
As a Yankee fan, the 2001 D-Backs (namely, Luis bleepin’ Gonzalez) did unfortunately give Kim a reprieve.
one thing that was really interesting, was Boston’s roster construction. They had 14 batters and only 11 pitchers. Well 10 pitchers and then Buchholz. thought that gave them a lot more versatility late in games than the Dodgers of all things. They had 3 catchers on the roster. In game 4, they had already burned 1 catcher and in the 9th were still able to PH for Leon with Devers, who delievered a huge hit. So that was part of the pinch hitting equation I think.
Completely missed them re-signing Buchholz and putting him on the roster. Dombrowski never ceases to amaze!
Or, perhaps, did you mean Pomeranz?
lol yeah. I did mean Pomeranz.
And the Dodgers had 12 pitchers, 12 batters and one Dozier.
You forgot to mention how the ALCS was rigged such that the Astros didn’t have a chance.
lol
LOL at the sour grapes for sure, but in any case it was nice to see the umpiring not take center stage for even a second in the World Series. Apart from a handful of blown ball/strike calls (particularly Kerwin Danley’s game, no surprise) there was very little to talk about — after the earlier rounds’ umpiring had been a really notable mess. I thought the World Series crew did an especially good job avoiding “rabbit ears” and not escalating anything with the two managers — both of whom were vocal enough that I think in a regular-season context they’d probably have been tossed at least once.
Wow, didn’t hear that one before.
Judging by that first table, the 1956 World Series seems like it was a really fun one to watch!
I am not a fan of either team but just so fitting to see Machado’s strikeout end the series.
Yes, I am sure Red Sox fans (for two reasons, this series, and the Pedroia incident a few years back) and Brewers fans were more than pleased to see the WS end with Machado striking out and looking bad doing it. Dback fans (and I am sure Giants and Padres fans as well) enjoyed it too.
And A’s fans for throwing a bat at one of their pitchers in 2014, and Royals fans for him punching Yordano Ventura in the face in 2016 ….
This is why Machado to the Yankees is destiny. Everyone hates him, everyone hates the Yankees, it’s perfect.
Gotta give Machado credit for staying on brand there on that final swing of the 2018 season by trying to spin completely around and spike himself in the ankle.
This is a great article. One thing I noticed prior to last night’s game was that the Dodgers — baseball’s best hitting team in the regular season vs. righties but only pretty good vs. lefties — had faced RHP in the World Series only 56% of their PA’s (as opposed to about 66% during the regular season). Now, their lineup is somewhat different now vs. lefties from what it was during the regular season but they performed worse vs. lefties than they did against the Red Sox’s righties. That the Red Sox were able to get the Dodgers’ RHB in the lineup more often and have some of their lefties (Muncy, in particular) face more lefties in the World Series certainly contributed to the Dodgers’ offensive problems.
yeah this was a huge part of things. They did have a pretty big delta in the regular season between vs lefties and vs righties- so that’s why folks do it.
And would note that the MLB average is 72% vs RHP, so the Dodgers faced a lot more left handed pitching in the regular season- then saw it even more of it in the playoffs……
Besides the fact the Red Sox had timely hits and HR’s, this boils down to one thing for me: Dave Roberts. Other comments are saying Madson but it was Roberts who kept throwing him out there. Why do I say this?
Walker Buehler and Ryu both dominated the Sox lineup, neither is even mentioned in this article…why? Because they only got their one start apiece with no bullpen work. Roberts was quick to pull Hill imo, and slow with Kershaw twice. You can say that’s second guessing but in all three cases it looked like the wrong move at the time.
The Dodgers lineup wasn’t doing much and ultimately it may not have mattered what happened with the pitching if they couldn’t score runs. But this felt like a mismanaged pitching staff and it made a good, tight series look more like a blowout.
Ryu was dominant? Nope. https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/statcast_search?hfPT=&hfAB=&hfBBT=&hfPR=&hfZ=&stadium=&hfBBL=&hfNewZones=&hfGT=PO%7C&hfC=&hfSea=2018%7C&hfSit=&player_type=pitcher&hfOuts=&opponent=&pitcher_throws=&batter_stands=&hfSA=&game_date_gt=2018-10-22&game_date_lt=&hfInfield=&team=&position=&hfOutfield=&hfRO=&home_road=&hfFlag=&hfPull=&metric_1=&hfInn=&min_pitches=0&min_results=0&group_by=name&sort_col=xwoba&player_event_sort=h_launch_speed&sort_order=asc&min_pas=0#results
Roberts made the same mistakes in LCS Game 7, WS Game 1, and WS Game 2 – left the starter in to face the top of the lineup a third time through. In each case, at least one batter reached safely. In fact, those five batters had an OBP of 1.000. Roberts didn’t appreciate the times through the order penalty enough.
I don’t know, he was cruising but as you said, once the lineup looped through the third time he got into trouble. By my count he went 4, 4 H, 4 K, 0 BB, 1 ER, I’d have pulled him once Betts came up with a man on. Maybe Madson still implodes but 3 of Ryu’s earned runs scored after he left the game.
Certainly Buehler is the better example of the two in terms of not being used at all the rest of the series but my main point is that those middle innings where what determined the series, to me, and Roberts clearly didn’t push the right buttons with his bullpen while Cora did.
Or Roberts pushed the right buttons (a little late) and the games still went awry. Jansen and Madson were bad in a way Roberts could never have predicted. Check the disparity between Madson’s regular season K% and BB% with the Dodgers (when his pitch mix was different than in WAS) and the related numbers in the WS. Same for Jansen’s HR/9 figures regular season vs WS. The contrast is striking! Roberts inability to predict that isn’t on him – it is on the insanity that is variance in a small sample and the pitchers themselves for failing in key moments.
I’m pretty sure Walker Buelher starts all Game 1s for the Dodgers from here on out.
as long as his arm doesn’t fall off after 177 innings this year. That’s a pretty big number of innings for a guy who just turned 24. Only 2 other 23 yr olds threw close to that many innings. Only 6 threw even 100 innings this year to include Buehler. Dodgers are going to have to be really careful with him next year.
The Dodgers carry 8 starting pitchers as creatively use the DL for this very reason
And he still threw 177 innings. Doing stuff next year might not help this out at all…. There’s a reason why LA wanted to limit him this year to 150 innings- but couldn’t.
Also next year might not have 8 starting pitchers for the Dodgers- as Ryu and Kershaw could easily both be gone.
Just going from my impression of watching the series, it really felt like the Dodgers had essentially no chance of winning. They just looked so hopeless at times that it was hard to comprehend they won the NL pennant. It’s not that they are a bad team – obviously they are not – and they certainly could have won, but after a while it felt like re-watching a movie and already knowing the ending.
After watching the World Series, I have to seriously wonder if the Dodgers would have made the playoffs in the American League. I suppose they could have beaten out Cleveland for the Central division, if they were so fortunate to be placed there, but it is not obvious that they are better than Oakland.
You can’t jump to that conclusion based on a small sample size of 5 games where they didn’t exactly match up well against their opponent (not that many teams would have matched up well against Boston this year).
The Dodgers struggled in April and early May, but were really good after that, and they did make the WS last year with essentially the same team (change Seager for Machado, add Buehler, subtract a couple of the better bullpen arms they had last year, so essentially a wash), so it wasn’t a fluke.
The AL was very top-heavy this year, but overall, the NL had a winning record against the AL during interleague play, and there were several VERY bottom feeders in the AL to help inflate the W-L records of the top teams. Oakland was good, to be sure, but they feel more like a fluke to me than to say that they were better than the Dodgers. And this is coming from a DBack fan that hates those guys.
The NL had a winning record in interleague play 1 reason and 1 reason only. The AL Central. The West was 50/50 and the East was AL by 54-46.
And the bullpen wasn’t just a bit worse this year. It was much worse than the Jansen/Morrow/Maeda pen that was really good.
I do think Boston with their lefties was a pretty bad matchup for LA.
Well, the AL teams got to play the AL central a lot more than the NL: teams did, and that’s my point. Did the Dodgers get to play any of those teams this year? I think most of their interleague games were against the AL West.
well LA did get to play 3 with Houston(in LA and they went 1-2 with a 4-18 run differential). Also went 2-2 vs Oakland.
So they got to play 3 of the 5 playoff teams and went 4-8 vs them this year.(to include the WS).
Dodgers were really weird quite frankly. They had if you break down the season into sixths 3 periods where they were only 39-42. Then other 3 periods where they were 52-29. plus then 163. So half the year they were playing like a 78 win team, but the other half like a 104 win team.
stever20 – I think you raise a great point that the NL probably only had a winning record over the AL last year because NL teams beat AL teams more often. Huge, if true.
I don’t really disagree with you. I know if we played this series a thousand times, the Dodgers would win it a substantial number of series.
What I am discussing here is my emotional attachment to the series. After watching for a while, the vibe I got was L.A. was going to find a way to lose games, and they kept finding ways to lose games. Even the game they won seemed more like “you know, we have to go to work tomorrow” sort of mercy than true victory. It was like watching the Mets.
Was Mookie’s HR off Kershaw actually a slider? Certainly didn’t seem like one at the time.
On the live view I also mistook it for a bad fastball, but it was a hard slider that hung.
I used to think the reason Kershaw has bombed in the post season is that the Dodgers keep throwing him out there on unusually short rest, but the numbers show that he has actually done better in such situations:
* 3.16 ERA, 2.29 FIP in 42.7 IP — 1-3 days rest
* 4.50 ERA, 4.22 FIP in 62.0 IP — 4-5 days rest
* 5.13 ERA, 4.68 FIP in 47.3 IP — 6-12 days rest
[FIP calculated using +3.20 factor]
But consider his SUBSEQUENT appearances after the ones on short rest. What do we find there? I think most of his worst starts pre-2017 were ones that followed a short rest start.
Again though, there is just SO MUCH VARIANCE in a sample of ~150 IP that it is foolish to look for a signal in that.
so I looked at things a bit differently-
1st starts/appearance of postseason- 3.94 ERA/3.95 FIP 48 IP
appearances with normal rest or more- 5.43 ERA/4.78 FIP 61.1 IP
appearances on short rest- 3.16 ERA/2.29 FIP 42.2 IP
now looking at the normal rest starts- he had 4 times where he had started on short rest prior to the normal rest time. In those 4 times- his numbers were actually ok in 2 of the 4 starts. Overall he was in those 4 starts with a 5.14 ERA/3.82 FIP. But in the other 8 starts where he was on normal rest with no short start prior- he had a 5.58 ERA and 5.28 FIP.
How is JACK MORRIS in the list of highest career postseason ERAs? I thought he was lights out in the playoffs – that was the main reason for his Hall of… you know what, forget it.
I would be really curious how many guys have thrown 60 innings in the playoffs. I looked, and there were 64.
And as far as Morris- it’s all the ’92 postseason. If you take that 1 postseason out, he’s got a 2.60 ERA and #14 on the list of TOP ERA’s in postseason history minimum 60 innings.
Sure, take out 4 bad starts and he looks better. Pretty sure you can pull that trick for a few others too. He only made 13 postseason starts…The 1992 Jays lost 4 playoff games, 3 of which were started by Morris, and won a start where he gave up 5 runs in 3.1 innings.
In 1992 Cito Gaston leaned so heavily on Morris in the regular season, regularly leaving him in to chase Ws (for Morris, not necessarily the team), it shouldn’t have been a surprise that he had nothing left in the tank. Not ever again as it turned out, as Morris was completely cooked after 1992. I wish we had velocity/spin rate from that era, so I could see if he was actually getting by on smoke and mirrors at the end, or maybe he always did?
There’s only one factor that decided a Boston victory: they were the superior team.
There are two factors that resulted in the Dodgers coming up short in two consecutive WS: Clayton Kershaw and Kenley Jansen. I would add Dave Roberts here, too, but it’s clear that the front office did not give him enough bullets two postseasons in a row.
Outstanding piece Jay!