Exploring a Second Alex Verdugo Trade

Tommy Gilligan-USA TODAY Sports

It’s tough to defend one of the most unpopular trades of the past 10 years, but when Mookie Betts got traded to the Dodgers in 2020, some people tried. One of the most commonly grasped straws involved the centerpiece of the deal, Alex Verdugo. Nobody worth listening to said Verdugo was as good as Betts, who was at that point an MVP, the best player on the best team of the 2010s, and on a bullet train to Cooperstown. But Verdugo was a good player, of a similar type to Betts. He’s also three and a half years younger than Betts, and at the time of the trade had five seasons of team control left to Betts’ one.

And if you squint hard enough, you can see it. Verdugo, at his best, has the same strengths as Betts: hitting for contact, defense in right field, doubles power. Where the comparison falls apart is that Verdugo is merely good at those things, and an average regular overall, while Betts is among the best in the game at defense and contact hitting. And while Verdugo is good for about a dozen home runs a year, Betts averages 32 home runs and 22 stolen bases per 162 games played. Snatch is a pretty good gangster movie, but anyone who tells you it’s as good as The Godfather is trying to get one over on you.

Now, Verdugo does have something more concrete in common with Betts: He’s one year from free agency, and the Red Sox are shopping him.

There are plenty of teams with a need for a reliable right fielder, and Verdugo, by virtue of playing his entire career for the Dodgers and Red Sox, is definitely a name. With more than 2,500 major league plate appearances under his belt, he probably is what he is as a player by this point, but he’s also only 27 (he turns 28 next May). That makes him positively youthful as one-year rentals go, and eliminates some of the downside risk associated with other possible alternatives.

Which brings up an important issue: If the Red Sox want to trade Verdugo, they must think he’s more valuable than other corner outfielders who are available in free agency. We shall see.

This isn’t a great free agent class for corner outfielders. There is obviously no Aaron Judge on the market this year. Even if there were, any team that seriously pursued a player like Judge would be disappointed to have to settle for giving up a prospect to acquire Verdugo. MLB Trade Rumors projects that Verdugo will make $9.2 million in arbitration this offseason; let’s go with that number. What would a team be willing to trade in order to acquire an average right fielder making $9.2 million?

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Maybe less than you’d think.

Before the start of free agency, the Brewers were prepared to decline Mark Canha’s $11.5 million team option. The Tigers swooped in and picked Canha up for the low cost of a 25-year-old minor league pitcher who might eventually turn into a decent middle reliever.

On balance, I think Verdugo is a better player than Canha at this point in time. He’s a better defender, and while Canha was the better offensive player last year, Verdugo has been a better hitter in recent years, both for average and power. He’s also seven years younger and (if the projection comes good) is due to make a couple million dollars less. Canha, on the other hand, walks more and gets on base by getting hit by pitches. He also didn’t demonstrate the troubling platoon split that dogged Verdugo last year.

Here’s how Verdugo stacks up against Canha, as well as six corner outfielders listed on this year’s Top 50 Free Agent rankings. The listed stats are from 2023, and the listed age is for 2024:

We Have Alex Verdugo At Home
Player Age Yrs AAV* PA BB% K% AVG OBP SLG WAR wRC+
Alex Verdugo 28 1 $9.2M 602 7.5% 15.4% .264 .324 .421 2.0 98
Mark Canha 35 1 $11.5M 507 9.7% 15.6% .262 .355 .400 1.6 111
Jason Heyward 34 1 $10M 377 9.0% 17.0% .269 .340 .473 2.2 121
Lourdes Gurriel Jr. 30 3 $12M 592 5.6% 17.4% .261 .309 .463 2.1 106
Jorge Soler 32 3 $16M 580 11.4% 24.3% .250 .341 .512 1.9 126
Adam Duvall 35 1 $8M 353 6.2% 31.2% .247 .303 .531 1.9 116
Tommy Pham 36 1 $8M 481 9.8% 22.0% .256 .328 .446 1.8 110
Teoscar Hernández 31 3 $15M 678 5.6% 31.1% .258 .305 .435 1.8 105
*Verdugo’s arbitration projection via Matt Swartz of MLBTradeRumors, all other contract projections from FanGraphs’ Top 50 Free Agent crowdsourcing.

These players (as well as Whit Merrifield, Joc Pederson, and a few others whom I left off this chart) are all very different, so a team that’s interested in paying around $10 million for an average corner outfielder might be interested in Verdugo, but not Duvall, for instance. But even if you want a good defensive right fielder who might need to be protected against left-handed pitching for about $10 million, Heyward is out there. How much would a GM be willing to part with, in terms of prospects, in order to get the younger Verdugo? Probably more than the Brewers got for Canha, but probably less than you’d think based on name recognition.

Then, the Red Sox would have to go out and find a replacement. That would cost money and/or trade capital. Trading Verdugo before he leaves in free agency sounds like a smart thing to do, but it might create more problems than it solves.

There are three scenarios in which it would make sense to pursue trading Verdugo. The first is a challenge trade: Verdugo for a similar player (pretty good but not great, might benefit from a change of scenery) at a different position. A pitcher, perhaps, or maybe a middle infielder. These trades aren’t as common as I’d like, but it’s a possibility. There’s some scuttlebutt around a potential Verdugo-for-Gleyber Torres swap, which would fit this model.

Second: Verdugo turns out to be worth more than I’m projecting. Looking at that list of potential free agent outfielders, one thing most of them have in common is that they have a glaring weakness that would require some kind of crutch. Either a platoon partner, or regular baserunning or defensive help. Even with Verdugo’s platoon splits, I’d still be comfortable running him out there every day, in almost every scenario. I’d say the same for Gurriel and maybe Duvall, but after that it gets a little dicey.

Maybe a potential trade partner values only needing to spend one roster spot on right field, enough so that they’re willing to send over a better prospect in return. Or maybe a team with a desperate need for corner outfield help ends up without a chair when the music stops, and the Red Sox suddenly find some leverage.

The third scenario: Boston gives up on 2024 and decides that Verdugo is not in the team’s long-term plans. In that case, trade him for whatever you can get, and hand right field over to whichever reclamation project or non-roster invite feels like heading northeast. (Perhaps Joey Gallo might like to play his home games flanked by the Pesky Pole and the Green Monster.) This wouldn’t send a great message to fans who already expect more than the Red Sox have delivered over the past five years. But most of the damage has already been done on that front; barring a hell of a first offseason from Craig Breslow, the Sox will head into 2024 as the likely fifth-place finisher in the AL East.

All of which is a bit of a disappointing note to end on, I realize. But what the Red Sox do with Verdugo — if anything — will be instructive as to the direction Breslow intends to take the team.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anon21Member since 2018
2 years ago

I wish I could find the Bill James comment about Alex Verdugo from maybe 3 years ago–something about how everyone was dumb for not seeing that Verdugo was actually a great return for Betts, likely to be a star, or similar.

(Why do I take pleasure in recalling other people being wrong when I am so often wrong myself?)

kevo8Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

(Answer: It’s precisely *because* you [as we all are] are so often wrong)

Mean Mr. Mustard
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Likely spin, given that he works (or did, I dunno) for the Sox.

LesVegetables
2 years ago

“Then, the Red Sox would have to go out and find a replacement. That would cost money and/or trade capital. Trading Verdugo before he leaves in free agency sounds like a smart thing to do, but it might create more problems than it solves.”

I’m not entirely sure this is true. There is a little bit a of a logjam in the outfield with Verdugo, Yoshida and Duran, and Wilyer Abreu and Ceddanne Rafaela both at the point in their development process where they will need regular major league at bats sooner rather than later. I am not saying either of those guys will be better than Verdugo, or that they will even be good. The will likely be pretty bad. But if either (or both) of those guys factor into the Red Sox future at all it’s getting close to a point where you need to give them some rope at the major league level.

dl80Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  LesVegetables

I think that’s fair, but Yoshida is so bad on defense at the easiest position, that he should be a full-time DH. Duran was quite good last year, but is coming off an injury, so I think the Red Sox aren’t going to want to trust a Duran-Abreyu-Rafaela outfield just yet.

Manco
2 years ago

Verdugo is missing the serious focus Boston demands of its franchise players. Rumors of moving on are the realization that he can’t meet those expectations. There shouldn’t be a rush to move him, but getting Soto completely justifies being picky.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Manco

This is going to be too subtle for most people.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“too subtle” from username “weekendatbidens?” (I am laughing)

seriously, though, I was a bit surprised the article avoided discussing his multiple benchings, which would certainly give some orgs pause (or give the impression that the Sox are willing to sell low on him after Alex Cora’s coronation)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

The one thing about Verdugo that always made sense for the Red Sox is that he is a good fit for Fenway on paper. He was projected to be a 115 wRC+ “tweener” who didn’t hit enough to play RF but didn’t play defense well enough to play CF. But in Fenway, that sort of player fits very well.

But Verdugo doesn’t look like he’s 15% better than league average as a hitter, so it doesn’t work. Also, that means he doesn’t have any value to anyone else either. Like, I cannot imagine the Red Sox getting someone like Gleyber Torres (who is a better hitter and can sort of fake being an infielder) in return.

Brock244
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think w Verdugo you are banking on upside. He has a rare blend of excellent contact rates while hitting the ball pretty hard. Pretty decent defender in RF too. In theory, that sounds better than the results. I’m sure there’s interest in trying to get him to lift more, especially in a park that’s more conducive to LH homers (like, say Yankee Stadium)

Also, with him it always seems like he’s really good for 3-4 months of the season then has 1-2 months that just destroy his numbers. Consistency seems like his biggest issue. The flip side of that Is he does get up for the big games. Was excellent in the playoffs and had a million walk offs. When motivated he’s usually good

Last edited 2 years ago by Brock244
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Gleyber doesn’t just fake being an infielder: he fakes being a middle infielder!

He’s a -3/4 2B, while Verdugo is a +2/3 RF.

Last edited 2 years ago by Cool Lester Smooth
GFE
2 years ago

He’s a -3/4 2B, while Verdugo is a +2/3 RF.”

I’m at a loss here. What metrics are you citing?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  GFE

Literally the last three years of “Def” pro-rated to 650 PA, haha

dl80Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Verdugo feels like a near carbon copy of Benintendi.

CC AFCMember since 2016
2 years ago

I’m forgetting who called him “Hoobastank Trot Nixon” but I’ve never been able to get that out of my head ever since

chipjoshMember since 2019
2 years ago

I’ve heard some rumblings over the years about Verdugo effort / maturity. It’s subjective, but are those days behind him enough that a contending team would trade to add him to the mix?

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  chipjosh

I’d be pissed if my favorite team traded anything of value for him. He got benched multiple times this season for his attitude, and it’s not like he’s a rookie – a troubling veteran is much more of a concern than some boneheaded early 20’s rookie.

PC1970Member since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Esp considering he’s starting to make some $$.

Attitude issues usually don’t get better when someone is making close to 8 figures..unless a team gambles that he’ll be on his best behavior in hopes of a free agent payday next winter?

hahigginsMember since 2018
2 years ago

Kinda feel like the market is nice for contending teams to add corner OF/DH bats…feels low on JDM, Teoscar, Joc, Pham, Brantley, Soler, add Hoskins, Belt, and Justin Turner in there..

joey
2 years ago

Verdugo to Arizona for Perdomo and Saalfrank ?..

an all lefty (and pretty damn good) outfield for d-backs, and 2 young guys with lots of upside to help rebuild the red sox

Last edited 2 years ago by joey
RobertMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  joey

I can’t see how that deal is good for Arizona

deaconbluerayMember since 2025
2 years ago

Would you trade Manuel Margot for Verdugo right now, straight up? Margot can play center and is an excellent defender overall, while Verdugo is probably a little bigger threat with the bat. I think Margot is better in the clubhouse (based only on rumors).

Which player draws a better return if both are dealt this offseason?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  deaconblueray

I think I’d take Verdugo because Margot has had some trouble staying healthy. I think a healthy Margot is better though.

It’s a good question! Could go either way.