FanGraphs Power Rankings: August 7–13

What a difference a week makes. With plenty of teams streaking up and down the standings, the playoff picture in both leagues is as murky as ever. We’re also at the point in the season where we can start thinking about which teams are positioned to play spoiler down the stretch.
A reminder for how these rankings are calculated: first, we take the three most important components of a team — their offense (wRC+), their pitching (a 50/50 blend of FIP- and RA9-, weighted by starter and reliever IP share), and their defense (RAA) — and combine them to create an overall team quality metric. I also add in a factor for “luck,” adjusting a team’s win percentage based on expected win-loss record. The result is a power ranking, which is then presented in tiers below.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braves | 75-42 | -1 | 124 | 95 | 84 | -6 | 157 | 100.0% |
| Rangers | 70-48 | -5 | 121 | 91 | 102 | 14 | 167 | 91.7% |
The Rangers continued their red-hot August with series wins against the A’s and Giants last week. They’re just three games behind the Orioles for the best record in the American League and have held off the surging Astros and Mariners to maintain their grip on the AL West.
The Braves emerged from their most congested portion of their schedule with five wins in eight games last week. They outscored the Mets 34–3 over the first three games of their four-game weekend series before losing on Sunday night, 7–6. Matt Olson took over the MLB home run lead by blasting four last week; he’s now up to 43 on the season, already a career high.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rays | 71-49 | -3 | 117 | 88 | 102 | 9 | 154 | 95.9% |
| Blue Jays | 66-54 | 0 | 108 | 92 | 85 | -3 | 148 | 65.7% |
| Dodgers | 71-46 | 0 | 116 | 98 | 95 | 1 | 141 | 100.0% |
| Orioles | 73-45 | 8 | 103 | 100 | 86 | -8 | 107 | 98.4% |
| Mariners | 63-54 | 1 | 103 | 93 | 89 | 12 | 142 | 34.6% |
| Astros | 68-51 | 0 | 105 | 97 | 97 | 6 | 129 | 90.4% |
All of a sudden, the Rays are facing all sorts of woes. On Saturday, they placed Shane McClanahan on the 60-day IL with a forearm injury that will cost him the rest of the season. For a team that’s already lost Drew Rasmussen and Jeffrey Springs to season-ending injuries (not to mention the back issue that forced Tyler Glasnow to miss his start last week), it’s another unfortunate hit to the pitching depth. Then, on Sunday, reports emerged that Wander Franco was being investigated regarding some concerning social media posts.
The Blue Jays have struggled with consistency all season long; to wit, they split a series with the Guardians and lost a series to the Cubs last week, allowing the surging Mariners to come within a game and a half of the final Wild Card spot in the AL. With Hyun Jin Ryu back from his Tommy John surgery and Yusei Kikuchi in the middle of the best run of his career, Toronto optioned Alek Manoah back to Triple-A to continue working out his issues. Bo Bichette still looks like he’s a couple of weeks away from returning from his knee injury, though Jordan Romano and Kevin Kiermaier look like they’ll be back from the IL this week.
The Dodgers have lost just once in August and pushed their current win streak to eight games with a sweep of the Rockies last weekend. They didn’t have the splashiest of trade deadlines, but Lance Lynn has surprisingly provided some stability to a starting rotation that is only just now getting healthy again, and Clayton Kershaw was activated from the IL last week and contributed a solid start on Thursday. Los Angeles now has a commanding 8.5-game lead in the NL West, a shocking gap considering it wasn’t even in first place at the All-Star break.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phillies | 65-54 | 2 | 100 | 90 | 93 | -2 | 120 | 84.2% |
| Cubs | 61-57 | -4 | 105 | 101 | 93 | 7 | 131 | 54.0% |
| Twins | 62-58 | -2 | 103 | 87 | 97 | -9 | 117 | 90.5% |
| Giants | 63-55 | 2 | 94 | 97 | 89 | 11 | 113 | 65.5% |
| Brewers | 65-54 | 5 | 89 | 96 | 92 | 22 | 103 | 83.5% |
| Padres | 56-62 | -9 | 105 | 89 | 101 | 22 | 148 | 21.9% |
Wednesday was a night of celebration for the Phillies: Weston Wilson crushed a home run in his first major league plate appearance; Nick Castellanos blasted two home runs, the second of which was his 200th career dinger; and as the headlining act, Michael Lorenzen fired a no-hitter in his first start in Philadelphia since coming over at the trade deadline. They couldn’t keep the good vibes going over the weekend, scoring just once over their final two games against the Twins. Still, the struggles of every other NL Wild Card hopeful have given the Phillies a three-game lead in that race.
The Giants barely avoided a sweep at the hands of the Rangers with a dramatic, walk-off win in the tenth inning on Sunday. That victory salvaged a 2–4 week and helped them stay 1.5 games ahead of the Marlins in the NL Wild Card race. That series against Texas began an extremely tough stretch of schedule against playoff contenders that includes the Rays, Braves (twice), Phillies, Reds, Padres, and Cubs before finally easing up in September.
The Padres are quickly running out of opportunities to turn their season around at the last minute. After a particularly lackluster performance in a losing effort in Seattle on Wednesday, there were some pointed comments from Juan Soto after the game. They bounced back in their first game against the Diamondbacks in a huge weekend series but lost on Saturday and Sunday and are now 5.5 games back for the final wild card spot. They’ll have another shot at Arizona this weekend, which now seems like a make-or-break series.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Sox | 62-56 | 0 | 104 | 104 | 95 | -39 | 91 | 15.6% |
| Angels | 59-60 | 0 | 109 | 104 | 106 | -4 | 106 | 1.9% |
| Yankees | 60-58 | 1 | 96 | 108 | 86 | 9 | 99 | 5.7% |
| Diamondbacks | 59-59 | 2 | 99 | 102 | 103 | 15 | 99 | 20.7% |
| Guardians | 57-62 | -3 | 91 | 93 | 93 | 3 | 101 | 8.5% |
| Marlins | 62-57 | 7 | 97 | 95 | 98 | -14 | 87 | 44.9% |
| Reds | 62-58 | 4 | 96 | 109 | 97 | -15 | 54 | 23.9% |
After an ugly 2–8 stretch to start the month, the Red Sox have gotten back on track with series wins against the Royals and Tigers last week. Trevor Story, Chris Sale, and Garrett Whitlock are back off the IL, and Triston Casas is powering the offense nearly singlehandedly. That’s a lot of last-minute reinforcements for Boston, which has a lot of work to do to get back into the AL Wild Card race.
The Angels showed some signs of life in a series win against the Giants early last week, but they were short-lived; the Astros handed them back-to-back 11–3 defeats over the weekend, and Los Angeles barely avoided a sweep with a close 2–1 victory on Sunday. The Angels’ postseason hopes are hanging by a thread, and they’re almost at the point where they need to start looking toward an Ohtani-less season next year. They’ll have plenty of opportunities to affect the playoff picture by playing spoiler down the stretch, but they need to find ways to get some of their youngsters more playing time to assess what they’re working with moving forward.
The four-way race for the final NL Wild Card spot ended this week with the Marlins a half-game ahead of the Reds and Cubs. They got there thanks to a series win against Cincinnati earlier in the week and then a dramatic series win against the Yankees capped off by a walk-off victory on Sunday. All four teams won their series over the weekend, though Arizona is at a significant disadvantage thanks to its slide down the standings earlier in the month.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinals | 52-66 | -4 | 111 | 106 | 101 | 1 | 119 | 0.4% |
| Pirates | 53-65 | 2 | 90 | 105 | 98 | 1 | 67 | 0.2% |
| Mets | 53-65 | 0 | 101 | 107 | 115 | -11 | 62 | 0.8% |
| Nationals | 53-66 | 2 | 95 | 111 | 113 | 5 | 63 | 0.0% |
| Tigers | 53-65 | 4 | 87 | 107 | 98 | 4 | 62 | 1.0% |
The race for the final two protected draft lottery picks is probably going to come down to these five teams. They’re separated by just a single game in the standings, and each of them looks stronger than the bottom four teams in the standings (though the Nationals are actually ineligible to receive a lottery pick since they earned one last year). These five teams are also the most likely to play spoiler down the stretch, since all of them can put together a competitive performance on any given night.
| Team | Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Sox | 47-72 | -3 | 86 | 108 | 108 | -10 | 28 | 0.0% |
| Royals | 38-81 | -6 | 86 | 114 | 114 | 18 | 46 | 0.0% |
| Rockies | 45-73 | 2 | 76 | 120 | 100 | -12 | 22 | 0.0% |
| Athletics | 33-85 | 0 | 89 | 135 | 128 | -11 | 17 | 0.0% |
If there’s one thing Rockies fans could enjoy about their team during these lean years, it was a winning record at home. Over the last decade, Colorado has posted a losing record in Coors Field twice, and one of those years was the pandemic-shortened 2020 season. They’re at risk of losing that home field advantage this year, having gone 25–30 so far. They still have home series against the Diamondbacks, Braves, Blue Jays, Cubs, Giants, Dodgers, and Twins on the docket, which means they could play a significant role as a spoiler down the stretch — but only if they can turn Coors Field back into a tough place to play in.
…
| Rank | Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Braves | 75-42 | -1 | 124 | 95 | 84 | -6 | 157 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 2 | Rangers | 70-48 | -5 | 121 | 91 | 102 | 14 | 167 | 91.7% | 0 |
| 3 | Rays | 71-49 | -3 | 117 | 88 | 102 | 9 | 154 | 95.9% | 0 |
| 4 | Blue Jays | 66-54 | 0 | 108 | 92 | 85 | -3 | 148 | 65.7% | 0 |
| 5 | Dodgers | 71-46 | 0 | 116 | 98 | 95 | 1 | 141 | 100.0% | 1 |
| 6 | Orioles | 73-45 | 8 | 103 | 100 | 86 | -8 | 107 | 98.4% | -1 |
| 7 | Mariners | 63-54 | 1 | 103 | 93 | 89 | 12 | 142 | 34.6% | 0 |
| 8 | Astros | 68-51 | 0 | 105 | 97 | 97 | 6 | 129 | 90.4% | 1 |
| 9 | Phillies | 65-54 | 2 | 100 | 90 | 93 | -2 | 120 | 84.2% | 3 |
| 10 | Cubs | 61-57 | -4 | 105 | 101 | 93 | 7 | 131 | 54.0% | -2 |
| 11 | Twins | 62-58 | -2 | 103 | 87 | 97 | -9 | 117 | 90.5% | 0 |
| 12 | Giants | 63-55 | 2 | 94 | 97 | 89 | 11 | 113 | 65.5% | -2 |
| 13 | Brewers | 65-54 | 5 | 89 | 96 | 92 | 22 | 103 | 83.5% | 1 |
| 14 | Padres | 56-62 | -9 | 105 | 89 | 101 | 22 | 148 | 21.9% | -1 |
| 15 | Red Sox | 62-56 | 0 | 104 | 104 | 95 | -39 | 91 | 15.6% | 1 |
| 16 | Angels | 59-60 | 0 | 109 | 104 | 106 | -4 | 106 | 1.9% | -1 |
| 17 | Yankees | 60-58 | 1 | 96 | 108 | 86 | 9 | 99 | 5.7% | 0 |
| 18 | Diamondbacks | 59-59 | 2 | 99 | 102 | 103 | 15 | 99 | 20.7% | 0 |
| 19 | Guardians | 57-62 | -3 | 91 | 93 | 93 | 3 | 101 | 8.5% | 0 |
| 20 | Marlins | 62-57 | 7 | 97 | 95 | 98 | -14 | 87 | 44.9% | 0 |
| 21 | Reds | 62-58 | 4 | 96 | 109 | 97 | -15 | 54 | 23.9% | 0 |
| 22 | Cardinals | 52-66 | -4 | 111 | 106 | 101 | 1 | 119 | 0.4% | 0 |
| 23 | Pirates | 53-65 | 2 | 90 | 105 | 98 | 1 | 67 | 0.2% | 1 |
| 24 | Mets | 53-65 | 0 | 101 | 107 | 115 | -11 | 62 | 0.8% | -1 |
| 25 | Nationals | 53-66 | 2 | 95 | 111 | 113 | 5 | 63 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 26 | Tigers | 53-65 | 4 | 87 | 107 | 98 | 4 | 62 | 1.0% | -1 |
| 27 | White Sox | 47-72 | -3 | 86 | 108 | 108 | -10 | 28 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 28 | Royals | 38-81 | -6 | 86 | 114 | 114 | 18 | 46 | 0.0% | -1 |
| 29 | Rockies | 45-73 | 2 | 76 | 120 | 100 | -12 | 22 | 0.0% | 0 |
| 30 | Athletics | 33-85 | 0 | 89 | 135 | 128 | -11 | 17 | 0.0% | 0 |
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
For Wander Franco’s prospect grading, he should have been given a 20 on the Intelligence scouting scale
I look forward to the Fangraphs article on Franco.
I think we can assume there won’t be one until and unless there’s something more substantial than an… X? What do we call the things formerly known as tweets now?
I most definitely do not look forward to the inevitable breakout of culture war in the comments section, that’s for sure.
You call them x-tweets
If he gets suspended, there might be a playoff odds update around that. Otherwise, there’s not a lot of substance to talk about. But I’m sure that is not going to stop some commenters anyway.
That’s actually one of the reasons I’m looking forward to Fangraphs eventually writing on the matter. I know they won’t half-ass it just to get an article out first. They will wait until the facts are known and make a careful and thoughtful analysis of it.
And then the comments will inevitably descend into a cluster, but that is part of the show.
I look forward to someone saying that it’s not rape because it was consensual.
I do because I’m a messy bitch who loves drama.
Maybe if he were an RPG character?
If Wander Franco somehow escapes a Yaroslavl full team-elimination event because he’s on the restricted list for raping a 14-year-old, I will strip naked on a street corner in San Diego and jack myself off until the police put a bullet in my skull.
That #2 Trade Value Ranking has aged like mayo left out in the sun.
The Cleveland series was a split, not a loss, for the Blue Jays, and reports yesterday were that Bichette will likely be back in the lineup by the end of this week. Manoah was optioned because he was the 6th man in a starting rotation with 3 off days in 8 days. Geez guys.
Still completely absurd not to have the Yankees at least 5 spots lower. Maybe 8-10.
Dropping them 5 spots would put them around the Cardinals and Pirates, two teams with far worse records and who play in a worse division. Dropping them 8-10 would put them around the Nats, Tigers, and White Sox. I know it’s been a frustrating season for the Yankees but they’re clearly superior to all of those teams.
Correct. What’s absurd is that the Cardinals have the 11th highest Team Quality score, 1 point behind #10 Phillies.
Let me amend that. This whole ranking exercise, the way its done here, is absurd.
The Yankees are in the right spot. They are a .500 team, frustrating for Yankees fans, but clearly better than teams in the next lower tiers.
Quick question. Why do you have the jays over the orioles and dodgers? Orioles are 1st in al east and have looked great after the all star break with no significant injuries or recent underperformance and the dodgers have been very good since the all star break as well. I am probably just ignorant but want to implore the thoughts of others.
I agree.
I’d rather face Baltimore in a 7 game series. They are very lucky, and they don’t have the formula to win in the postseason.Dominant SP and scary type bats
I don’t think the jays have either of these things in great quantity. Gausman is an ace yes, but Berrios, Kikuchi and Bassitt are all solid not dominant. Their bats are also not that great, as Bichette, who is currently on the IL, is the only regular with an ops higher than .800. Furthermore, I believe the most important aspect of any team in the postseason has to be a good bullpen. Orioles have great relievers in spades and decent enough starting to make most people scared. They also have a whole starting lineup that seems to be hitting with an ops approaching .800.
Everyone thinks they wanna face the O’s… then they get a bird put on them.
Also, their defense is really questionable. It’s not always the big innings that kill you in the postseason, it’s stupid crap like grounders going through someone’s legs or misjudged fly balls. Playoffs are almost always by thin margins, and with below-average defense, and an average offense and rotation, the Orioles are going to be playing with fire often. The Jays and Dodgers are better in all those regards. The Orioles bullpen is awesome, but it’s not enough to offset everything else, and it really shows in the “Luck” column. Only two other teams are +5 or more, and they’re both rated way lower than the O’s are.
That I might agree with. However, I am slightly biased with respect to the orioles defense as Mullins robbed a game-tying home run before hitting the go ahead in the top of the next inning. I also think the Orioles are a young team who will likely grow mentally in the next few months as we approach the postseason. Hopefully this means their defense on routine plays also improves. I don’t want to meat ride, but I think the orioles seem to be the team to beat in the AL with the exception of the Rangers .
I think you’re overrating the O’s bullpen and underrating its offense.
They lack a true middle of the order power bat, but most of their lineup any given night is above average per wRC+.
I think the defense is underrated by RAA. They are 6th and 7th in the league by UZR and DRS respectively.
Truly a mystery
The Orioles are 12th in BaseRuns record, and even if you think that there’s something “real” causing them to win more games than that, they’re probably not that much better than the Blue Jays.
The Dodgers, OTOH, are 3rd in BaseRuns record, ahead of every team other than the Braves and Rangers. They’re not as good as either of those two teams, but I would say they’re probably closer to them than they are to the Blue Jays (or Orioles, for that matter).
Cardinals are 5th in wRC+, and 11th in team Quality and are 14 games under .500. They look so out of place in the No Man’s Land” standings when you look at actual offensive output. Truly baffling season.
They do look to be out place in no man’s land given the fact that their actual record places them 5th from the bottom. Truly baffling ranking.
I agree that they should have a somewhat better record than they do, but this is generally what happens when your pitching staff collapses around you and you eventually trade away a few of the decent or better pitchers that you actually do have.
With Matz now on the IL, the starting rotation is now basically Mikolas and pray for rain, while the bullpen isn’t much better, although at least their closer and best reliever, Helsley, is about to return from the IL.
Not sure what the rationale in having Rays over O’s is at this point. Balty isn’t a traditional team but they keep on winning, and against top teams, while their AL competitors deal with injury, losses and now scandal. The Rays haven’t been a great team since April…
I kind of agree here – I’m fine with the Orioles being a tier below the elite, but the Rays don’t seem like the kind of team that should be above them anymore.
The Rays have double the run differential of the Orioles. It’s one thing to say injuries have made them worse or beatable, but that’s a bit much.
Has MLB started handing out pennants based on run differential? I missed that but I’m thrilled! That means the Yankees were the AL champs last year by finally beating out Houston.
Since their 30-9 start to the season, the Rays are 42-40. Good for 14th in MLB. Baltimore is 50-32, behind only Atlanta at 51-30.
Run differential over that span:
TBR: 26
BAL: 39
The Orioles aren’t a world beater, but the Rays certainly haven’t been one either and with their current situation, I wouldn’t have confidence in the Rays becoming one again.
The Padres in the solid contender tier? Based on what they were supposed to be, not what they actually are?
Just another example of a writer being unable to shake his preconceived idea that the Padres were supposed to be really, really good and since eyes are no longer allowed to be used to see what is actually occurring on the field the writer reacts like a Pavlov dog and puts the Padres where the pundits say they “should” be. They even lost a series to the D’Backs who have been playing at the A’s level (7-25) for the past month
I dunno how many times this has to be repeated, but the simple truth of baseball is that run differential predicts future record better than actual record does, and the Padres still have the same run differential as the Jays and Mariners.
There are obviously some things wrong on that team, but every actually predictive statistical indicator says they’re not actual garbage. The Padres are -9- games behind their expected pythag and baseruns records.
In normal circumstances yes but the 2023 Padres have been 2 steps forward 3 steps back all season long. They are clearly missing something. Rotation and lineup depth to be more tangible. But their run differential is not saving them. That club has no cohesiveness to play like a team.
So you’re saying they lack grit and hustle(tm)?
We all know forecasting future performance is a best guess right, and unless you have a reason why we should all abandon the process that seems to work best, that’s where the Papas belong.
How much does the Orioles team quality change if they were closer to league average? There is a pretty big disagreement in UZR/DRS vs. RAA for them as a team and I’m wondering how much that -8 RAA is dragging the team quality metric down.
The commitment to the San Diego Padres this season is really bonkers. I guess I don’t get ranking the Dodgers below Texas when everything you said about them is true of LA, but without injury clouds. And Mariners above Astros is just incredulous fanaticism. Truly the clickbaitiest thing on FG, and I don’t think I’ll be coming back unless the methodology is something other than “I’m in my feelings right now, and here’s a delta to make them seem empirical”
As with anything, the wheat has to be separated from the chaff and this series has been marked by many questionable rankings. The writer definitely shows a Mariners bias. He had them in the top tier a couple of months ago. .
I try not to click on these articles, but sometimes I do anyway and I tend to regret it. The ranking “methodology” is clearly nonsense. If you’re trying to figure out “who has been hot lately” a rolling version of BaseRuns–an average of the last 3-5 weeks of BaseRuns scores–is the way you would do it. If you want to see who is going to be better in the future, then the projections are the way to do it–but projections probably won’t change much unless players get hurt.
At this point it is abundantly clear that this series drives a lot of clicks, partly because people wonder what the heck is going on with them. So that incentivizes FG editors not to change it up, and keep everything the same. So I don’t have much hope that a more rigorous approach will prevail.
I understand, kind of, how the component rankings are calculated. It’s not clear how they’re then combined into a single “team quality” number, or why the resulting rankings aren’t ordered by that number.
I agree that a “who’s been good lately” ranking based on a rolling 25 game BaseRuns run differential would be both more useful and clearer.
They can’t admit defeat on the Padres . Team hasn’t won 90 games in the Preller era but apparently adding a ridiculous Xander contract and retaining a few mediocre RPs who had a good NLDS made then a powerhouse.
I enjoy the Padres failures as much as anyone does, but they still have a +57 run differential and that predicts their future results a lot better than any year to date record does.
I’m confused why the Rays are at this point up so high. Injuries have decimated them.
(and also, why the Orioles team quality is still league average!).
The Rays are up so high because they have a large run differential (+139), they’re 17-19 in one run games, and aside from their 8-16 July, they’re back playing over .500 again in August. Will they continue to play above .500 with all those injuries? We’ll see.
The Orioles team quality is above league average (107) because their hitting is slightly above average (103), their starting pitching is average (100), their relief pitching is lights out (86), and their defense is below average (-8). So whatever formula they use gets the Orioles to 107, which is above average overall.
The large run differential was with functionally a completely different team. The roster they rolled out at the start of the season during the streak and the roster that has been roughly .500 since are different for sure.
The methodology behind these power rankings makes zero sense, but I still love them because the Blue Jays are ahead of the Orioles.
And I love them because the Nats moved up out of the hopeless box.